Friday 27 March 2020

Thought Of The Day

Having woken at a more reasonable hour, I see there were 3,395 visits yesterday and concern by staff for their safety continues pretty much unabated. The situation in prisons is of particular concern, but clearly the government has no appetite to consider any executive release, despite almost universal calls to do so. Ignoring all the rhetoric about us 'being in this together', it's still a right-wing government running things. 

I thought it would be good to re-publish the following from regular contributor 'Getafix today:- 

Like everyone else I'm terrified by Coronavirus. Especially as I have a family link to an NHS doctor working on the frontline in a hospital, and I'm afraid that the calm reassurences given to the gereral public by Government isn't reflected in what the doctors and hospitals are being told. The next 14 to 21 days apparently will show just how serious and deadly the situation is, and the 1.5 million most at risk because of serious underlying health conditions that received an NHS letter really need to keep themselves safe, as that letter also means that if you do get sick, it's highly unlikely you'll get access to a ventilator.

But as frightened as I am, I'm also fascinated by the rapid and liquid changes occurring to our social structures and what those changes are exposing. Richard Branson, Philip Green, Mike Ashley and Tim Martin have all caused outrage this week by their self interested response to the pandemic. Branson takes considerable amounts of money from Government contracts, many of them within the NHS, but he wants a £7.5 billion bail out for Virgin Atlantic, whilst at the same time telling his considerable workforce to take 8 weeks unpaid leave. Green has got rid of any staff he could without any renumeration, and Martin has told all his staff to go and apply for jobs at Tesco. He's also publically criticised the government decision to close pubs. There's no evidence he says that the virus can be spread by people going to pubs.

I'm sure that when this is over people will remember that those whose extreme wealth affords them access to political platforms, showed in a time of Global crisis that their primary concern wasn't for the safety and wellbeing of the public, but rather the protection of their own wealth.

We've also had a decade of austerity, and the mantra used for that was "we're fixing the roof whilst the sun shines". They've shrunk the State dramatically, and told us they've to sell off so much of our public services to the private sector to enable them to fix the roof. But now the weather's changed and the roofs OK but there's no walls left to put it on.

The State has been shrunk so much it's in a wholly inadequate position to deal properly with this crisis. But the call to Arms has gone out none the less, it's been sounded in the public sector, the third sector, a call for a huge voluntary contribution, and even to those that have retired from public service, all being asked to step up to the plate. The same call to Arms hasn't gone out to the private sector, and in fact much of the private sector are still being allowed to flaunt the rules, but they do so with the lives of employees, the CEOs just sit in their ivory towers. I'm sure many will remember all this when we come out the other side of this.

People too are beginning to realise just how important is is to be able to trade across boarders without restriction. Building the numbers of ventilators needed by the NHS to help combat the virus has been hampered as many of the components needed are manufactured in other countries that are also on lockdown. The same with our food supplies. Do we really want to live in a world where we create obstacles to essential supplies in exchange for some concept of national identity? It's terrifying, all of it, but I can't help being fascinated at the same time.

'Getafix

46 comments:

  1. Gosh.

    But he is right. The solution is political organisation.

    The Labour Party may not offer a complete or perfect solution.

    Mr Corbyn's comments when he suggested when as Opposition Leader (more than Labour leader) and he described Mr Johnson's remarks about him as a political obituary at Prime Minister's questions are worth a read.

    I wish I had learned, everything is political, when I was in my teens rather than much later in life as saying it now it is too late for so much.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies:-

    Today we heard the news of the first prisoner to die after testing positive for coronavirus. It was sadly not unexpected.

    Prisons provide the perfect environment for contagious diseases to wreak havoc. They are crowded, cramped, unsanitary institutions with inadequate healthcare provision for a population already in poor health. On top of that, in Britain we have an ageing custodial population, with many prisoners now in the age groups at greatest risk of complications from coronavirus.

    Many more prisoners will become seriously ill with Covid-19. Some will die.

    The safest thing to do now is embark on an ambitious programme of decarceration across the prison estate. Prisoners with underlying health conditions, elderly prisoners, and pregnant women should be the first to be released, followed by all women prisoners and those who pose no public safety risk. Some countries have already released many prisoners as a precaution.

    This task won’t be as straightforward as simply letting prisoners out. Even without a deadly pandemic, there are many complicated issues that need to be thought through. A very large proportion of prisoners won’t have a home to go to. Very many will have no income. Most will have mental health, drug or alcohol support needs. Prisoners also have an elevated risk of death upon release.

    It would be much easier to mitigate these problems if governments hadn’t spent the last decade de-funding and hollowing out various kinds of state support, an issue the coronavirus pandemic is bringing into sharp relief as it puts unmanageable pressures on an already strained National Health Service.

    And when we bring the virus under control, we should insist that things do not go back to business as usual. Prisons should not be filled back up with people who experience most acutely the social problems governments don’t want to solve. Our communities should not be left without the support and resources they need.

    Once we've emptied prisons of the groups outlined above to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, the vacant prisons should close, and the sites be redeveloped for the benefit of the people who live around them. For starters, in place of some prisons, we could build hospitals to address the short-falls in healthcare services which existed even before the pandemic. Genuinely affordable housing, good employment opportunities, support services, and public green spaces could all be provided on these sites, rather than the public health hazards that currently occupy them. There is always a better use for a piece of land than as a place for a prison.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it bears repeating that, while common sense aint so common, your contributor Getafix seems to be a natural spring of common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BBC website:-

    Retired Metropolitan Police officers are being asked to return to the force as it tries to cope with the coronavirus outbreak in London.

    Former PCs and sergeants who left in the past five years are to be offered work in a paid or voluntary capacity. The Met also wants those nearing retirement to consider staying on.

    Met Commissioner Cressida Dick said: "Demands on us will grow and vary over the coming weeks but I want people to know and see the Met is here for them."

    She is now writing to retired police constables and sergeants to re-join at those ranks, either on a full or part-time basis. Senior officers may also be able to return to service where they bring specific skills and experience. The Met also wants retired officers to sign up as special constables.

    Officers who retired at the rank of inspector or above, are being asked to consider joining the special constabulary for at least 16 hours a month, or they can volunteer in other roles.

    Ms Dick said: "Police officers overwhelmingly join 'the job' to help people and to make a difference, and that desire will be as strong today as it was the very first day they joined. I am hopeful that these exceptionally experienced and knowledgeable former colleagues choose to come and be part of our team and support London at this extraordinary time."

    The Met said those wishing to return will be asked to complete an online form and must be sponsored by a serving Met officer. It added it was waiting to receive "confirmation that the added costs will be met by government".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also BBC website:-

    The family of a GP who died while being treated for suspected coronavirus say he sacrificed his life for his job.

    Dr Habib Zaidi, 76, died in intensive care at Southend Hospital, Essex, 24 hours after being taken ill on Tuesday. His daughter Dr Sarah Zaidi, also a GP, said he showed "textbook symptoms" of the virus. If test results confirm he had Covid-19, he would be the first doctor in the UK to die after contracting the virus.

    Dr Sarah Zaidi told the BBC: "For that to be the thing that took him is too much to bear. It is reflective of his sacrifice. He had a vocational attitude to service. He was treated as a definitive case. There is little clinical doubt it is coronavirus, the test result is academic."

    She added: "We can't mourn in the normal way. We can't have a normal funeral. He left a gaping hole in our hearts, but a loss that is also felt within the community that he devoted almost his entire life to. We are praying for the safety of everyone right now."

    Dr Zaidi, a GP in Leigh-on-Sea for more than 45 years, had been self-isolating and had not seen patients in person for about a week. He was a managing partner of Eastwood Group Practice with his wife Dr Talat Zaidi. Their four children all work in the medical profession.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tories spend lives like water this public are too far invested in the capitalist ideals but do not understand they are really minions while Branson Green and Murdoch own governments. Money and the economy is driving who lives now. Why because Tory policy sought to sell off the lot to those billionaires. It means it's their tune. Pandemic won't hurt Branson the bastard sat on his own private Carribbean island. Fully stocked eating ice cream while the rest of us now exposed to risk queuing 2 hours to shop in a Tesco with half stocks and further limits. NHS have no beds the wrong kit and need ventilators that Johnson the c*** sits back and wouldn't join Europe to get them manufactured. Instead funding Dyson who already left the UK over Brexit. These people are scum . The illnes will never get near this group because they have all they need and more to remain the elite as long as Tories proffer their empire while fooling the vulnerable to keep voting them in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of PM Johnson's chums & Tory donor is Crispin Odey who has increased his asset management funds by £millions as result of betting against the stock market, e.g. winning if/as/when others lose at times of crisis. Similarly with Paul Marshall, amother Tory donor of some £500,000, gaining £tens-of-millions after betting against holiday company TUI. So while your holidays disappear, your flights disappear, you or relatives are stranded overseas, your holiday insurance doesn't cover you, think of Mr Marshall & his clients rolling in cash, handing fat wads to a grateful Boris & co.

      Thanks & credit to Private Eye magazine.

      "We'll do whatever it takes."

      Delete
  7. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/covid-19-uk-prisoners-with-health-issues-face-death-sentences

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maurice Stevens has been fighting to highlight the injustice of his son’s imprisonment for more than a decade – but with the Covid-19 pandemic claiming its first death among the 83,000 prisoners in England and Wales the pressure is on.

      An 84-year-old sex offender was confirmed as the first British inmate to die after contracting coronavirus, with another 19 prisoners infected across 10 prisons. The death and rising number of cases behind bars has prompted calls for those with underlying health conditions to be at least temporarily released.

      Stevens’s son, Danny Weatherson, 31, is in Northumberland prison. He was 17 when he was sentenced to a minimum term of 15 months for attempted robbery of a phone and a coat under a controversial imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentence.

      Eight months ago, Weatherson was diagnosed with two blood clots on his lung and is receiving medication. Stevens says the emergence of the coronavirus, which affects the respiratory system, has deeply troubled both father and son.

      “He’s just terrified now,” Stevens says from his home near Gateshead. “He was hoping for a July parole hearing but it appears all the face-to-face hearings have been suspended. I spoke to him five days ago and he was telling us all about his lungs, how they’re feeling worse.”

      Weatherson, who has bipolar disorder, has attempted to kill himself twice in prison, and Stevens is worried the panic over the virus could deeply upset his son.

      “They need to hold emergency parole hearings because of the coronavirus. He’s done a lot of time. What are they trying to achieve? They keep a lad in there for 14 years for trying to steal a phone? What does it achieve?”

      Appeal, a charity law practice that specialises in fighting miscarriages of justice, has called for the temporary or early release of the following groups: prisoners convicted of non-violent offences whose appeal applications have passed the single judge screening stage; prisoners on remand charged with non-violent offences; prisoners aged over 70; prisoners with pre-existing serious health conditions; pregnant women, and all prisoners in category D minimum security open prisons.

      Emily Bolton, Appeal’s legal director, said: “For the government to leave prisoners to die of Covid-19 behind bars when these deaths could be avoided is like leaving prisoners to drown in Orleans parish prison when the waters rose after Hurricane Katrina.

      “Britain is better than this, and time is running out to avoid minor offences becoming capital crimes, and life sentences from becoming death sentences.”

      Delete
  8. It's my neice that's a doctor on the frontline in an NHS hospital. I have little or no contact with her, but my sister (her very proud mum) speaks to me daily, and is frantically worried about the situation at present, lack of equitment, not enough PPE, and all the extra unpaid hours being demanded from the hospital she works in.
    I was struck yesterday by something my sister said, as its a very ironic consequence of Coronavirus, and it's this.
    As Coronavirus spreads and the death toll rises, the number of deaths caused by Coronavirus, is likely to be surpassed by the number of lives saved and extended by the reduction of human activity around the globe and therefore a greater reduction in pollution, during the global lock down.
    I'm sure there will be much debate when this is over about going back to our 'old ways' if it can be evidenced that those old ways present a greater risk to our mortality then Coronavisus ever did? Maybe?

    It's a very long read Jim, but you might enjoy it.

    https://theecologist.org/2020/mar/18/virus-haunting-europe-vector-capitalism

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the circumstances, fingers crossed that your niece & other family members escape any serious consequences from this crazy situation.

      Delete
  9. I think now is the time we all get behind Ian's NAPO and come together. Jim, stop the infighting, promote solidarity and let's group behind Napo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Napo won't need the virus to terminate after their performance an exodus is coming.

      Delete
    2. "I think now is the time we all get behind Ian's NAPO and come together. Jim, stop the infighting, promote solidarity and let's group behind Napo." I've always supported Napo - they and others may think and say differently, but such is life is it not?

      Delete
  10. Boris Johnson tests positive for Coronavirus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/live/2020/mar/27/uk-coronavirus-live-rough-sleepers-nhs-applause-covid-19-latest-news

      Delete
  11. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has tested positive for coronavirus. Mr Johnson said he developed mild symptoms over the past 24 hours, including a temperature and cough.

    He said he will now self-isolate in No 10 but will "continue to lead the government's response via video-conference as we fight this virus".

    Mr Johnson was last seen on Thursday night, as he clapped outside No 10 as part of a nationwide gesture to thank NHS staff. In a video on his Twitter account, Mr Johnson said:
    "I'm working from home and self-isolating and that's entirely the right thing to do. But, be in no doubt that I can continue thanks to the wizardry of modern technology to communicate with all my top team to lead the national fightback against coronavirus. I want to thank everybody involved and, of course, our amazing NHS staff."

    He was tested at No 10 by NHS staff, on the personal advice of England's chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, Downing Street said. He will still be in charge of the government's handling of the crisis, the statement added.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 11:18 may or may not be a troll, but either way, they are sadly misinformed.
    NAPO is not ‘Ian’s,’ Although he appears to treat the organisation as his own fiefdom and believes he is not accountable to those who pay his wages.
    The performance of NAPO has been abysmal over a number of years but is currently appalling.
    I am not anti NAPO, I remain a member and have been a trades unionist for over 45 years throughout my working life, but my current membership is based on habit rather than any consequential thinking and retaining my membership should not be seen as me being pro Ian.
    Another quote worthy of mention, I support the current administration rather like the rope supports that hanged man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said - thank you "Anonymous 27 March 2020 at 11:58" - for also speaking for me.

      I am a lifetime Associate Member of Napo - on account of my membership status changing at the time of retirement. I first joined Napo in 1974 around the time of the first (I believe) ever national student probation conference - convened by the (old) London Branch - at the time I was training for a CQSW via secondment by The Home Office to the University of Liverpool.

      I was one of about 5 or 6 who were pushed forward at the end of that first conference and on an ad hoc basis together organised the second one held in London in 1975 chaired by David Mathieson, then ACPO in Merseyside and I think chair of Napo's Press & Public Relations Committee - though at around that time he became deputy chair of Napo - so I go back a long time.

      Napo has struggled centrally since Judy Mcknight retired as General Secretary in 2008 five years after I took a recommended early retirement.

      https://www.gov.uk/government/people/judy-mcknight

      https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/merseysides-former-chief-probation-officer-3010120

      Delete
  13. Ian has had his hands tied with this blog constantly blasting him. He could have walked away but stuck at it for pittance. Napo was on the brink and he saved it from collapse. Now is the time to get behind our leader who has stuck with us through thick and thin. Jim you have the clout to do this so tell your thousands of followers that now is the time to all get behind ian

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At a time of national crisis I certainly will not be drawn into any wrangling about union politics - the only important issue is the protection of staff, clients and the public and that has absolute top priority. Now I suggest you all grow up and focus on that very simple aim.

      Delete
    2. Of course we need to get behind our Napo leader and I do, in the same way and spirit that I also get behind our Prime Minister because of the positions they hold, not because of who they are or how they fulfil those positions.

      Denigrating each other - as I have been in this forum is pointless and totally against the ethos of "probation"

      Delete
    3. Laura Kuenssberg BBC:-

      The Health Secretary Matt Hancock has also tested positive for Coronavirus after he developed symptoms on weds night - mild illness and he is working from home.

      Delete
    4. I'm wondering how Government advice is applied here.
      If you or anyone in your household shows symptoms or tests positive you all need to self isolate.
      Given the number of cabinet and Cobra meetings attended by Johnson and Hancock, aswell as the increased number of meetings with advisors and officials, are we likely to see the whole Government going into isolation?

      'Getafix

      Delete
    5. The sensible thing to do would be test full cabinet - and I'm sure they will.

      Delete
    6. But do the testing kits work?

      Delete
    7. Both Sky & BBC reporters commented on the fact that as the BoJo is infected story was broken around 11am today, Dominic Cummings was seen exiting at speed from No.10 & running off down Downing Street. he hasn't been seen since. Does that make him a public health hazard? Should he be arrested for intentionally endangering the British public?

      Delete
  14. Firefighters will be able to deliver food and medicines, drive ambulances, and retrieve dead bodies during the coronavirus outbreak in an unprecedented agreement between the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), fire chiefs, and Fire and Rescue Employers.

    For the first time, all three stakeholder groups have agreed a joint national approach to the crisis. The fire service organisations say that the measures in the agreement reflect the scale of the national crisis and the urgency of the response required.

    Under the agreement, firefighters will be able to:

    Deliver essential items like food and medicines to vulnerable people

    Drive ambulances and assist ambulance staff

    Retrieve dead bodies, should the outbreak cause mass casualties

    Firefighters will continue responding to core emergencies, such as fires and road traffic collisions, but under the agreement can now provide additional services specifically related to COVID19. The agreement states that core responsibilities must be maintained throughout the crisis.

    The organisations will meet weekly to discuss any additional requests for assistance made by Local Resilience Forums and Strategic Coordination Groups. Any activities considered will be risk assessed with fire and rescue personnel being given any necessary additional training and the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).

    The additional work taken on by firefighters will be temporary to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially in place for two months, the agreement can be extended or shortened if agreed between all parties.

    The agreement between National Employers, the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and the FBU follows measures to limit cross-infection between firefighters and the public, agreed earlier this week.

    There are around 48,000 firefighters and emergency control staff in the UK.

    ReplyDelete
  15. From Guardian:-

    A key worker responsible for preventing crime during the coronavirus outbreak is facing eviction after her landlord said her job meant she risked contaminating his family.

    Shannon Harford, a probation officer in west London whose job involves meeting prisoners out on licence, albeit from behind a screen, has been given just over a month’s notice to leave the flat where she is a lodger. She said the decision showed “no empathy or compassion”.

    The landlord gave her notice before Thursday night’s announcement by the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, of a full ban on evictions for the next three months.

    Labour and renters’ campaign groups had accused the government of breaking its promise to protect people from evictions during the coronavirus epidemic after emergency legislation tabled on Monday evening only extended the notice period that landlords must give tenants before they can evict them from two months to three. It did not include a ban on evictions currently under way, but they have now been included in new measures.

    Harford said on Friday she was nevertheless still leaving.

    “It is horrible for someone to make you feel like you are contaminated,” Harford said. “In lockdown how am I supposed to do viewings or even move? I am aware of the health risk I am putting myself at by going to work,” she said. “I am passionate about keeping people safe. But that’s not how they [the landlord] seem to see it.”

    Harford is a lodger in a shared two-bedroom flat, which is also used as a home office by one of the owners. She was told the owner was “reluctant to work in his office as you are still going to work to meet people … We therefore would want to give you notice to the end of April. She would put us at risk in a way,” the landlord said, asking not to be named. “But I do understand the situation as well. It is not as if I am kicking her out on the street.” He said she could go and live with her boyfriend, but she countered that this was an unreasonable assumption to make and that their relationship was relatively new. She is, however, now planning to do just that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “albeit from behind a screen”

      What screen would that be then ?

      Delete
    2. Knowing our esteemed leaders, a roll of cheapest cling film wrapped with two rolling pins either side whilst wearing the same pair of swimming goggles earned from their 10 metres swimming badge in 1983. It really is a shambolic state of affairs and colleagues / public servants should not be treated in this way

      Delete
    3. You’re giving them too much credit !

      Delete
  16. "At a time of national crisis I certainly will not be drawn into any wrangling about union politics - the only important issue is the protection of staff, clients and the public and that has absolute top priority. Now I suggest you all grow up and focus on that very simple aim."

    Repeated because clearly some people have not understood the message.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Danny Shaw BBC News:-

    5 prison staff have tested positive for COVID-19 across 5 prisons. 4 Prisoner Escort and Custody Services staff have tested positive. On Wednesday, 6,644 prison staff were absent because of Covid-19 related issues, up 1042 on Tuesday and almost 20 % of prison workforce.

    Spread of the virus in prisons was widely predicted. The staff absence rate - which doesn’t include non-Covid related illness by the way - appears to have risen faster than expected. This will be of immense concern to the MoJ and put further pressure on them for early releases.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Danny Shaw cont:-

    Prisons latest: 27 prisoners in England and Wales have tested positive for COVID-19 across 14 prisons. They include: Wandsworth (at least 7 cases). Manchester, Cookham Wood, Leeds, Birmingham, Oakwood, Wymott, Leyhill, Pentonville, Huntercombe, Barton Moss secure children’s home.

    On Wednesday, the number of prisoners self-isolating was 968, up 176 on the day before. Two prisons are not transferring prisoners in or out: Birmingham, Littlehey. Several others have restrictions on transfers: Manchester, Oakwood, Wandsworth.

    ReplyDelete
  19. GENERAL UPDATE - COVID 19 BULLETIN 4

    NPS Sick pay and absence management position clarification

    Any sickness absence linked to Covid 19 will be excused from the Attendance Management Policy using manager discretion, this is included in the HMPPS FAQs.

    If someone has been off sick during the last 12 months for another reason and has exhausted their full pay sick pay there is no change to the contractual entitlement to sick pay so any further period of sickness absence will be paid at the relevant contractual rate (half pay or nil pay). However, if you are fit for work but forced to isolate / shield and unable to work at home this is not sickness absence but special leave with pay. It is important that in these circumstances the line manager ends any previous absence periods on the system to avoid confusion.

    CRC and NPS Divisional Exceptional Delivery Models (EDMs)

    Now that the overarching EDM has been issued each CRC and NPS division needs to compile their own specific EDM that is in line with the HMPPS model. This is taking a frustratingly long time to be agreed as there can be multiple versions before getting final agreement with the centre. Any members being asked to work in a way that is outside of the HMPPS EDM should raise this with their manager and contact local reps who can forward to Napo Officers and Officials for escalation to Napo HQ if needed. Please note however that there are likely to be swift changes to operations as the CRC or Divisional EDMs get agreed and rolled out, but this should hopefully reduce some of the issues that are understandably causing concern to our members.

    Staff working in Courts, APs and Prisons

    There will be specific EDMs for these areas of work and as they are agreed they will be issued via the employer. Updates for Napo members were issued yesterday (25.3.20) and more will follow as soon as we have more information. We are continually pressing for quicker progress in agreeing and issuing these models and guidance.

    Katie Lomas Ian Lawrence
    National Chair General Secretary

    ReplyDelete
  20. Interserve: work from home as per core hours

    if you get covid19 or are self-isolating for any reason ie high risk group or member of the family is isolating or whaever the reason maybe then you start accruing sick leave.

    ReplyDelete
  21. It is a shame probation is now working on the basis that staff will get sick at work. This is as opposed to putting in measures to protect staff from getting sick at work, or getting sick travelling to work. I cannot understand this given that working from home is available to all, and face to face offender contact can easily be replaced by regular telephone reporting contact. Ministers, directors, managers and unions, all endorsing putting staff at risk in direct contravention of government guidelines. Since when is visiting a probation office for a 10 minute slot such an essential journey that justifies putting public health at risk?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. I know someone who had a Reasonable Adjustment to work from home one day a week in the prison as they have a disability. They were refused a whole day each week and senior management refused to budge on it before the pandemic but now the prison they were moved to expects them to go into work in this crisis instead of working from home when all the POs in the prison that refused her one day homeworking are working from home.

      Delete
  22. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-scotland-52071852

    ReplyDelete
  23. "This is taking a frustratingly long time to be agreed as there can be multiple versions before getting final agreement with the centre." Centre aka the Death Star

    ReplyDelete
  24. Come on, media people. Richard Ford, Angus Crawford, Danny Shaw, Krish Gurumurthy, Adam McQueen.

    There's a story here about systemic negligence & what's happened - Mail & Torygraph have faithfully run the Govt's press release + Guardian has run a nasty-landlord story with inaccuracies that suggest probation officers see people from behind a screen.

    HMPPS via NPS & CRCs are still debating deeply flawed policy directives which means that public health is currently severely compromised by unprotected contact between & unnecessary movement of people in towns & cities across England & Wales.

    In Derbyshire they police have employed drones to shame people walking their dogs in the middle of nowhere. BUT...

    Probation staff, those they supervise & anyone else in their chains of contact have to play Virus Roulette.

    Cabinet Ministers & other senior figures have contracted the virus in the last week or two, presumably asymptomatic whilst they've been shut in strategy meetings.

    Assuming there were significant efforts to limit the risk of infection to these senior figures it shows just how ubiquitous & amenable to transmission this virus is.

    So why insist that people who are statistically more likely to have had exposure to the virus - for example those who may have just been released from prison, people with proven disregard for rules and laws, people from multi-occupancy accommodation, sofa-surfers or the homeless - have to travel to appointments in probation offices - where there are no bio-hazard facilities, no deep-cleaning, no screens in interview rooms, no capacity for 2-metre distancing - to meet with staff who are not equipped with PPE & thus have already had a high likelihood of exposure to the virus themselves?

    Its a bit like filling several leaky jerry cans with petrol & diesel, placing them in the boot of a car with a known electrical fault, then getting a chain-smoker to drive that car through a packed city centre... and insist that if anyone is maimed or dies it was the fault of those who were too close to the vehicle when it exploded: "They were expected to keep their distance."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As with SFO’s, when it all goes wrong probation workers will be thrown under the bus by the top brass.

      "They were expected to keep their distance."

      “They did not request PPE, although offices are frequently cleaned.”

      “They agreed to continue to work despite warnings about self isolation and social distancing.”

      “The local office managers implemented the exceptional delivery model without risk assessing the building first.”.

      “The exceptional delivery model was supported by trade unions.”

      Delete
    2. Agreed by unions ??? They can't agree anything without seeing risk assessments that protect staff it just goes to show you the moj hmpps are facilitated to damage us while we pay unions to help them do us down.

      Delete
  25. Bedtime contemplation:

    USA cases = 102,396; deaths = 1,607
    UK cases = 14,583; deaths = 759
    GER cases = 50,871; deaths = 351
    ITA cases = 86,498; deaths = 9,134

    WORLD cases: 594,344; deaths: 27,251


    Mobility, Proximity & Density nurture this virus.

    But we can starve it out.

    Staying Home = no mobility
    Social Distancing = no proximity
    Washing Hands = diluting/removing its presence

    We just need HMPPS on board now :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well not while HMPPS is trying to fool probation into believing it’s an emergency service!

      Delete