Thanks go to regular contributor 'Getafix for pointing me in the direction of this report from think tank Demos:-
To fix the justice system, the government must first grapple with the forgotten service: ProbationPolicing and prisons have been a mainstay of the news cycle for the Labour government, with the Southport riots, early prison releases, and (more recently) neighbourhood policing all making the headlines. While discussions around police and prisons continue to hit the headlines, pundits and policymakers too often neglect a crucial part of our justice system – probation services.
Maybe there is an understandable reason why. Five year (though often shorter) election cycles full of combative rhetoric, coupled with a public that remains fearful and paranoid of rising crime (despite actual falling levels) gives politicians the incentives they need to make big, public promises; promises of more police, more prisons and harsher sentences to assure voters that they will be ‘tough on crime’. In contrast, probation operates in the shadows. Investing into services that support prison-leavers may expose policymakers to criticisms such as being ‘soft on crime’. Part 1 of the Independent Sentencing Review confirms that this approach is not only the wrong answer but also exacerbating the problem.
However, now is the chance to do something different. Coming into office, the new government promised an end to such ‘sticking plaster politics’ and there have been some promising signs since the start of this Labour government. From the widely lauded speedy appointment of James Timpson as Minister of Prisons, to Shabna Mahmood’s early release scheme and commissioned sentencing review, the government has taken important and sometimes difficult steps towards resolving the justice crisis. However, these steps are not enough. Without giving attention to probation, the government will miss the opportunity to truly improve the outcomes of our justice system.
Probationary reform is both a moral and economic imperative.
Over the past few decades, successive attempts at top-down restructuring have veered probation away from its founding mission to support people back into society, to instead managing and avoiding risk. Combined with a strikingly low workforce of under 21,000 practitioners that manages triple the number of people currently in prison, the service is crumbling under pressure. This is clear in the massive increase of the recall population in prison from just 100 in 1993 to 12,920 in 2024. Judges and magistrates have also seemingly lost faith in the probation system to offer a better alternative to incarceration, resulting in a greater use of custodial sentencing. Now England and Wales incarcerate more than any other country in Western Europe. It is clear that probation is failing to support sustainable re-entry into mainstream society, hindering the ability of prison-leavers to live lawful, happy and productive lives.
This shortfall in probationary support is having dire consequences.
Most people leave prison only to find that they felt more stable when inside, with research by Birmingham City University finding 41% of prison-leavers were unsure where they would live on release. From 2023 to 2024, 13% of prison leavers were released into homelessness making them 50% more likely to reoffend. And whilst half of the people in prison deal with drug addiction, only one-third of those who left in 2022 received any treatment or support leaving them to look towards crime to continue funding these habits. When people feel they have no choice but to return to crime, we fail them, their victims and the public. But it does not stop there. The impact of this is also felt intergenerationally with children of offenders being more likely to commit crime themselves. A 2007 study found that two-thirds of those with a convicted father were convicted themselves by age 32 compared to a third without. Until we support those who leave prison to find safety and stability outside, we leave everyone at risk to fall back into crisis.
The failures of our current probation system also carry significant economic costs. In the detecting, sentencing and imprisoning of reoffenders, the government spends £18.1 billion per year. The government’s new ‘Plan for Change’ allocates £2.3 billion of the Budget to build four new prisons. In addition, His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service estimates it would cost more than double the current maintenance expenditure to bring the whole estate into fair condition. If probation worked effectively, intervening and supporting in the right way, the government would be able to invest that money into the public services that matter to us most, such as the NHS. Not only do we bear the massive cost of resentencing, but also the lost economic potential of those in prison rather than in employment. Spending more upfront to support prison-leavers to change their lives will lower their odds of returning to the crisis points that led them to prison in the first place. Rather than the tens of thousands of pounds needed to keep someone in prison, we must help them achieve their economic potential outside, giving them the support and resources they need to end the cycle of crime they are stuck in.
The government has taken difficult decisions to prove its commitment to resolving the justice crisis, the early release scheme being one of these. However, without attending to probation, we fear these efforts will be in vein as can be seen in the scheme’s overwhelming recall rates. Likewise, more prisons without the tools to keep people out of them will inevitably lead to further capacity issues.
Since its inception, Demos has been a thought-leader on public service reform. Over the past year, our Future Public Services Taskforce has been developing a new cross-cutting public service reform strategy. Based on this work, we believe a new delivery of probation – one founded on prevention, strong relationships and professional autonomy – will renew its direction. For the government to make real and lasting change in the justice system, it must first grapple with the forgotten service: Probation.
V important article - thanks. Reset and the upcoming Impact initiative are not based on much evidence of "what works" for offenders, no account taken of the Cycle of Change, for example. We need an Approved Premises building programme. Releasing prisoners to no accommodation is inhumane and adding to re-offending and recalls to prison.
ReplyDeleteThere’s an enquiry on this.
DeleteRehabilitation and resettlement: ending the cycle of reoffending
https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8678/rehabilitation-and-resettlement-ending-the-cycle-of-reoffending/publications/
The Justice Committee has launched its inquiry into Resettlement and Rehabilitation, which is centred around investigating the cycle of reoffending.
DeleteHM Prison and Probation Service aims to reduce reoffending by rehabilitating the people in its care through education and employment. However, reoffending in England and Wales remains high. For the year ending December 2023, 78% of all offenders cautioned or convicted for an indictable offence in 2023 had at least one prior caution or conviction.
The Committee has decided to investigate the journey of an offender through the criminal justice system and examine what offer of rehabilitation and resettlement the offender has the ability to engage with, to prevent future reoffending.
The inquiry sets out to look at what the regime offer is in different prisons and for different prisoner cohorts. It will also look at services in prison and whether they encompass principles of desistance and purposeful activity. The inquiry will also investigate governance in prisons, including staffing and contracting, and to what extent it impacts the ability to deliver rehabilitative services in prison.
The inquiry will also look at what support is available for ex-offenders’ post-release, and whether there is sufficient join up, data sharing and capacity of these services to deliver effective resettlement services. The inquiry will also consider alternatives to custody, and what impact licence recall conditions have on promoting resettlement, and the role of community sentencing.
When the job centres tell offenders to see if Probation can find them work, and the local housing services tell them to ask their Probation Officers to find them houses, and G.P's suggest they see if Probation can help them with well being and mental health, it really brings it home how necessary Probation is and how all the other local services are either failing or also stretched to breaking point...
ReplyDeleteI agree . I work in a prison and the lack of understanding about what probation actually does is very stark. We are expected to sort out everything from lost property to severe mental health issues . Unfortunately things are compounded by prison staff believing everything that a prisoner says over what we say. Our professionalism is entirely sidelined and we are thought no more that a personal assistant to the prisoner to get them what they want , when they want it. Ironically, we don’t get to do the one to one work that would help the prisoner most. Hopefully the various reviews may bring more clarity (although I suspect I am being optimistic!)
DeleteNo I doubt that. It merely reflects those agencies no longer have intention to provide to people outside of their target area. Sign posting people to us is all we do when referring them out in the first place. It's a revolving door nothing else.
DeleteWhen does the Inquiry report ?
ReplyDeleteLong time probation officer retired last year. Now a volunteer worker in a community advice service. It seems like all major agencies are now deliberately inaccessible so folk turn to anyone willing to help where you can just walk in and get help with massively complicated on line applications. It's just a massive exercise in shuffling off poor and vulnerable people.
ReplyDeleteBoo hiss!
Who's to say anti woke is wrong it is the other side of the perceived over generosity to people resources collectively. It needs a lot of consideration. Straight rejection is also a debate.
DeleteIs no-one safe from the so-called anti-woke agenda?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/mar/29/met-raids-quaker-meeting-house-and-arrests-six-women-at-youth-demand-talk?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-gb
A statement by the Quakers:
“No one has been arrested in a Quaker meeting house in living memory,” said Paul Parker, the recording clerk for Quakers in Britain.
“This aggressive violation of our place of worship and the forceful removal of young people holding a protest group meeting clearly shows what happens when a society criminalises protest.
“Freedom of speech, assembly, and fair trials are an essential part of free public debate which underpins democracy.”
The partial picture you mean.
Delete£400million (of a promised £2.3billion taxpayer money) to "ensure the country never runs out of cells again"... really?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-1500-place-prison-opens-as-government-grips-crisis
"HMP Millsike is the first of four new jails to be built as part of the Plan for Change to create 14,000 extra prison places by 2031. This extra capacity will help put more violent offenders behind bars, make streets safer and ensure the country never runs out of cells again."
What fresh hell is this? The language of 1970's magistrates has been exhumed & reanimated:
"The prison will be operated by Mitie Care and Custody and will have education and workplace training provider PeoplePlus on site to give offenders the tools they need to find work on release and stay on the straight and narrow."
And here comes that warm, reassuring hug:
"Situated on land next to the existing HMP Full Sutton, HMP Millsike has been named after Millsike Beck, a local stream that runs adjacent to the new jail, firmly embedding the prison into its local community."
"democratic deficit" - sounds like something jenrick would come out with but no... it comes from petulant labour.
ReplyDeleteIts not a 'forgotten' service... its a service that has been made intentionally dysfunctional by political ideologues; a position reinforced by current ministers who have the brass neck to describe the sentencing council as showing 'a democratic deficit'.
The hypocrisy being that the incumbent fuckwits are going to introduce new legislation so they can bypass the sentencing council, i.e. taking away a person's right to a considered assessment via a pre-sentence report & gaoling increasing numbers.
Well, they have all those new prison cells to fill & corporate chums to enrich with new prison building programmes.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/mar/30/ministers-bill-overturn-sentencing-guidelines-england-wales
ReplyDeleteOfficials in the Ministry of Justice spent the weekend drafting a piece of emergency legislation which would instruct judges to ignore the council’s guidance. The law would be brief and limited in its scope, according to people close to the process, with ministers hoping to pass it through both the Commons and the Lords in as little as 24 hours
Where's the ***real*** democratic deficit?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0m9n4m7w3jo
ReplyDeleteMahmood told the council's chair Lord Justice William Davis: "I think it is vital that the decisions taken on this question should be accountable to the public, both in parliament and at the ballot."
So what does she do?
Legislation will be tabled this week that government sources said would "surgically" remove that particular section of the new guidelines.
They will hope to rush it through both Houses of Parliament. But a Ministry of Justice (MoJ) source admitted "there is no world in which those guidelines don't come into effect" as planned on Tuesday.
The new law will "be very focused on the specific guidelines and specifically the bits we don't like about them," the source said.
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/20250310-Letter-from-Lord-Justice-William-Davis-to-Lord-Chancellor-on-Imposition-FOR-PUBLICATION.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e6640655be617e1490d69c/lord-chancellor-rt-hon_lord-justice-davis.pdf
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025-03-26-Letter-to-the-Lord-Chancellor-from-William-Davis-LJ-1.pdf
More Labour madness as Justice Minister willfully misinterprets sentencing proposal….https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/mar/30/ministers-bill-overturn-sentencing-guidelines-england-wales?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
ReplyDeleteAn Open Letter to:
ReplyDeleteThe Rt Hon Lord Justice William Davis
Chairman of the Sentencing Council
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
and
The Right Honourable
Shabana Mahmood MP
Lord Chancellor & Secretary
of State for Justice
Dear Both
I have a solution that avoids expensive, time-consuming, undemocratic emergency legislation whilst retaining the principle of good old single tier justice.
Request Pre-Sentence Reports for EVERYONE!
Yours in the spirit of Advise, Assist & Befriend,
Robert Jenrick's Reasonable Doppelganger
(if such a thing can exist)
And so the new fascism infecting the world is confirmed as alive & kicking in the uk... the sentencing council has capitulated to the trumpist apologists - in this case jenrick/mahmood/kiastarmer - & psr's will NOT be requested per the proposed guidelines. Clearly the bigoted, blinkered political class knows so much more about everything than anyone else.
Deletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yg887m6qdo
DeleteThe Sentencing Council says it has delayed the introduction of guidelines which advise judges to consider the lives of offenders from ethnic minority and other backgrounds before deciding on punishment.
It comes after the government said it would pass an emergency law to override the guidance, which prompted claims of "two-tier justice".
The guidelines were due to come into effect in England and Wales on Tuesday but are now unlikely to be introduced in their original form.
Earlier, the prime minister said he was "very disappointed" and had "no other option" but to pass a law overruling the body, after it previously refused to reconsider the guidance.
But government sources said it would be all but impossible to pass such legislation before Parliament breaks for Easter.
In a statement, the Sentencing Council said its chairman, Lord Justice William Davis, met Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood on Monday morning.
The council defended the guidelines as "necessary and appropriate".
But in the meeting with Mahmood, Lord Davis indicated the guidelines would not be brought in while there was a "draft bill due for imminent introduction that would make it unlawful".
"On that basis, the council, an independent statutory body, has chosen to delay the in force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect," the statement said.
Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the Sentencing Council had "folded under the pressure" after he had threatened a legal challenge against the guidelines.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the guidelines "create a justice system where outcomes could be influenced by race, culture or religion".
"This differential treatment is unacceptable - equality before the law is the backbone of public confidence in our justice system," she said.
"I will change the law to ensure fairness for all in our courts."
This is just peachy:
"Jenrick first raised concerns about the guidelines earlier this month, saying they were biased "against straight white men" and amounted to "two-tier justice". "
Those poor straight white men who have never had anything but injustice in their lives...
from Prison Reform Trust:
"What's the issue?
If our prison population reflected the ethnic make-up of England and Wales, we would have over 9,000 fewer people in prison—the equivalent of 12 average-sized prisons.
There is a clear direct association between ethnicity and the odds of receiving a custodial sentence. People from black , Asian, and “Chinese or other” backgrounds are more likely to be sent to prison at the Crown Court.
Black and Asian people in prison are more likely to be serving long sentences than other groups.
Black people and people with a mixed ethnic background serve a greater proportion of their determinate sentence in custody than white people.
Over a quarter (27%) of the prison population, 21,537 people, are from a minority ethnic group."
.Gov.uk - "18% of the UK population belong to a black, Asian, mixed or other ethnic group" (2021)"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/31/i-was-a-prison-governor-for-10-years-corruption-justice/
ReplyDeleteLeicester and Rutland probation are already preparing and taking steps to combat the prison overcrowding crisis.
ReplyDeleteI rather think that instead of preparing to accommodate more early releases from prisons, they should be arguing that too many prisoners are being subjected to post sentence supervision on release in the first place.
There's already three times the number on probation then there are in prison and it's just going to keep growing.
There's just too many people on probation supervision.
https://www.lincsonline.co.uk/rutland/news/measures-are-in-place-to-combat-prison-overcrowding-9410811/
'Getafix
I agree with you Getafix, but I can’t say I agree with them. As an objective observer the real issue isn’t prison overcrowding - the damage is already done. I was going through the Justice Committee’s evidence and hearings which doesn’t seem to be joining up with the sentencing review. There are plenty of solid ideas on prison and probation staffing, training, and capacity, but is anyone actually listening?
DeleteStop wasting taxpayers’ money on prison building, bureaucracy and excessive management.
Legislate to end post-sentence supervision (PSS) and make it voluntary for those who need it.
Overhaul community services so that people in prison and on probation have direct access to housing, education, employment, addiction treatment, and mental health support.
Properly fund a probation service that operates independently of prisons and the civil service, led by experienced and reputable probation managers. Only then might supervision become a viable sentence in its own right - with meaningful rehabilitation outcomes rather than simply reinforcing punishments.
Here we have cur kia starmer, leader of the Labour Reform Party, pleasing his gbnews audience:
ReplyDelete"Earlier on Monday, the prime minister had said he was "very disappointed", after the Sentencing Council previously refused to reconsider the guidance.
Sir Keir Starmer said the government would bring forward legislation to reverse it.
"There's no other option, so we will do that. We will fast-track it," he told GB News.
The Ministry of Justice said the legislation would "clarify that guidance relating to sentencing reports should not single out specific cohorts for differential treatment".
The Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill will be introduced on Tuesday."
However, no real effort has been made relating to sentencing that singles out specific cohorts for differential treatment, viz-"Official figures show that offenders from ethnic minorities consistently get longer sentences than white offenders for indictable offences."
"The Sentencing Council was established in 2010 to try to ensure consistency in sentencing. Sir Keir [seemingly the alter ego of cur kia], at the time Director of Public Prosecutions, was one of its founding members."
https://www.adruk.org/fileadmin/uploads/adruk/Documents/Data_Insights/Data-Insight-Ethnic-Inequalities-Sentencing-Crown-Court.pdf
"The 2017 Lammy review presented evidence of stark ethnic disparities at all stages of the CJS. From the point of arrest, through prosecution to custodial remand, sentencing and imprisonment, ethnic minority groups were both disproportionately represented and experienced disproportionately worse outcomes."
https://yjlc.uk/resources/legal-updates/ethnicity-and-custodial-sentencing-data-highlights-racial-bias
"Why are BAME adults accounting for 40% of stop and search incidents, when White adults account for 87% of the population? Why are Black adults more likely to enter a plea of not guilty? Why is there such a differential between White and Non-White when it comes to drugs-related offences? Why do BAME adults have less confidence in the criminal justice system?"
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022/statistics-on-ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022-html
"In general, ethnic minorities appear to be over-represented at many stages throughout the CJS compared with the white ethnic group. This is especially apparent when comparing to the ethnic breakdown of the population of England and Wales. The greatest disparity appears at the point of stop and search, custodial remands and prison population."
O probation union where art thou?
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67dda8074fed20c7f559f48b/
ReplyDeleteThis is NOT an April Fool
HMPPS_Action_Plan_response_Joshua_Jacques_-_12_month_update.pdf
Recommendation 1: Ensure there is consistent practice in the allocation and oversight of caseloads, including explicit reallocation of cases when a probation practitioner is absent from work.
Response: HMPPS have developed a Workload Measurement Tool (WMT) report which improves the accuracy and reliability of the WMT by reducing the human error recording within it
Recommendation 2: Ensure newly qualified officers are supported to develop their practice and are only allocated suitable caseload volumes and types of case during their post qualification period.
Response: Following engagement with operational staff and regional heads, the Probation Workforce Programme have developed and published a national framework for Newly Qualified Officers (NQOs)... The rollout of the national framework for NQOs and its supporting guidance was completed in July 2024
Recommendation 3: Develop an automated process to alert managers to unsuitable case allocations for practitioners (for example, to prevent unsuitable allocations to NQOs).
Response: This recommendation is partly agreed for affordability reasons. The feasibility of an automated alert has been thoroughly investigated. Unfortunately, a fully automated solution is not possible... HMPPS will instead alert managers to suitability of case allocations through a new Allocate a Person on Probation tool
Recommendation 5: Ensure that sufficient staff resources are allocated to the effective oversight, chairing and administration of MAPPA.
Response: The National MAPPA Team conducted an evaluation of the MAPPA Learning Resources in 2024 and found that where they were being used, respondents found them useful.. The survey did reveal that 22% of respondents were not aware of the resources prior to completing the survey
Recommendation 7: Ensure that probation practitioners understand their role in supporting the police and courts to monitor compliance with Criminal Behaviour Orders.
Response: Development of the new ‘civil & behaviour orders’ learning product is scheduled for launch by the end of April 2024... The HMPPS Civil and Ancillary Orders Awareness eLearning is required to be completed by a wide range of staff working in HMPPS.
https://hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/news/independent-serious-further-offence-review-of-joshua-jacques/
“Joshua Jacques was incorrectly allocated to a newly qualified probation officer who had only finished their training three months before being assigned the case. Under guidelines by HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), Jacques should have been allocated to an experienced, qualified probation officer..."
Get Probation away from prisons. Prisons are in no position to dictate to probation why they should be the dumping ground for poor management of prisons. Also stop listening to the alienated racists that seem to want every ethnic minority murderer executed. You got your entombed Whole Life Order and the government should not be paying mind to this knee-jerking gallery in terms of giving prison primacy-it's partially why the prisons are so full. Tough on crime. More compassionate on the causes of crime and give much more funding to community probation and our workload reductions should not be addressed by the prison crisis. We should have had our voices heard and had workload reductions based on our own issues. The longer this goes on and probation loses its reason to exist.
ReplyDeleteBBC News, Messages reveal Prison officer violence towards inmates in Welsh Prison. HMP Parc run by G4S ( no surprise there!) Officers boasting about punching prisoners and making fun of their self harm or suicide attempts. 17 inmates committed suicide I 2024, the highest number in any UK Prison. Mr Timpson said it was being looked into ! Since then silence!
ReplyDeleteFree the collective Probation 1- from prisons.
ReplyDelete