Tuesday 3 March 2020

Say Hello to TOM

Here it is, hot off the press:-

Introducing the Draft Target Operating Model 

This model is the blueprint for a strengthened probation service – one that keeps the public safe through the effective supervision of offenders in the community, providing credible alternatives to custody for sentencers. It looks to help those subject to probation services by identifying the right rehabilitative support to address offending behaviour, whilst supporting victims to access high quality, timely and effective support to help them cope and, as far as possible, recover from the effects of crime and rebuild their lives. This Target Operating Model comes at a time when the Prime Minister has placed public protection and safer communities among the Government’s top priorities. 

The model is built on two guiding principles. First, our people – probation practitioners in the NPS workforce – will be central to achieving this. By giving probation practitioners the right tools and support, we will help them to assess individuals’ risk, protect the public and change the underlying behaviour of those they supervise to break the cycle of re-offending. Second, to achieve the outcomes we are seeking, we need leadership that is grounded in our local communities, orientated towards their needs and able to convene the local public, private and third sector partners.

A strengthened service will place probation as the catalyst for systemic improvement across the criminal justice system – our courts, our prisons and our communities – to: 

Assess those charged with a crime so our courts can be advised of the often-complex factors at play in an individual’s circumstances. By getting this diagnosis right, probation can make sure the best interventions are being deployed that can divert the right people from prison by delivering safe and viable alternatives to custody. 

Protect the public and victims of crime by managing the ever-changing needs and risk profiles of individuals subject to probation services, working to ensure they fulfil the conditions of their sentence and that swift action is taken when they do not. 

Change people’s lives by delivering the right interventions to support people and provide the rehabilitation required to prevent future crimes. The Government is now putting reforms in place to reinvigorate the probation service and ensure it can reliably deliver its essential services, and continue to develop and innovate. Probation service staff will have their professional skills respected and developed, operations will be simplified, and the estate and technology will be modernised. 

With a need to prepare for the insights our data-rich world offers, and the desire to better design and tailor public services to the end-user, the reforms will allow probation to forge partnerships or jointly commission services with local partners enabling us to draw upon the experience and innovation that sits in other sectors.

What is changing? 

To learn lessons from the probation service’s recent past, and to build on its historic strengths, each element of probation’s work has been reviewed with potential changes consulted on with the delivery partners, external stakeholders, staff and professional leadership. 

These changes fall into five main areas: 

Unifying how sentences are managed so all individuals are case-managed within the same organisation, the National Probation Service (NPS). This provides greater clarity on the responsibility for cases, and improves continuity for those under supervision. Probation practitioners managing the post-release licence, or sentence on behalf of the court, can focus on this and engage other interventions or sources of support. 

Creating new regional probation leadership structures that enable greater local accountability and direction setting. We are creating a new leadership role to lead 11 new probation regions in England as well as a Director in Wales. Our 12 Regional Probation Director roles have been created to give senior managers autonomy to commit resources alongside other local decision-makers and partners. These regional roles provide visible leadership, accountability at the right level, and responsiveness to scrutiny or challenge. They provide confidence that the service can also adapt and drive national change when required by shifting circumstances or events. 

Enabling partnerships to deliver effective rehabilitation services. We will commission and co-commission specialist services from other providers in the commercial, voluntary, community and social enterprise sectors, where their services offer greater capacity, better value, or specialism and innovation. As devolution has pushed powers and decision making out of Whitehall – with PCCs, devolution in Wales and the emergence of influential Mayors – probation will be able to contribute to local problem-solving and respond to regional challenges. New regional leaders will focus on bringing together other parts of the justice system at a more local level under shared objectives. We have designed the competition and commissioning processes to create greater ability to co-commission services, and to give more direct opportunities for national and local voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations to deliver services. 

Modernising probation’s estate and technology so that it better supports the service’s work by providing the right physical space for working with individuals or groups, a high-quality working environment for staff and, where possible, encouraging collaboration with those working with the same individuals through co-location. Technology will be upgraded to enable better recording and sharing of information, and better analysis of data to inform effective decisions and planning. 

Enabling staff to be their best. There is considerable evidence on reducing reoffending that confirms the importance of the quality of the face-to-face relationship that sits at the heart of sentence management. While working in probation is frequently seen as a vocation, the role still demands and deserves a clear framework for professional development. Our workforce strategy will be driven by the aim to retain and recruit the best people from diverse backgrounds, ensure our staff have the right support and skills they need, and provide them with professionally rewarding career paths.

Next steps 

The Draft Target Operating Model describes in more detail how we are shaping the service in its next evolution. We are approaching this reform eager to learn as we implement, iterating our approach to achieve the best design to keep the public safe.

The full 196 pages of bedtime reading can be found here. 

12 comments:

  1. "This model is the blueprint for a strengthened probation service – one that keeps the public safe through the effective supervision of offenders in the community, providing credible alternatives to custody for sentencers."

    "This has been cobbled-together following the wilful devastation of the probation service - a once gold-standard public service that has been decimated by ignorance, by greed and by the arrogance of political ambition. We are desperately trying to recover the pre-TR position where effective supervision of offenders in the community provided credible alternatives to custody for sentencers."


    Jim, do you remember writing this?

    "Sunday, 13 October 2013 - When Tom Meets Pam... I think most readers are now familiar with Tom, but I'm extremely grateful to a reader for introducing me to Pam, whom I'd never heard of before and knew nothing about. It would seem though that Pam has been waiting quietly in the wings for Tom to come along and the pair are very much destined to become an item as this whole TR omnishambles unfolds. The Target Operating Model very much has it's eyes on the Platform for Achieving More."

    ReplyDelete
  2. NOMS, NPS, MoJ, HMPPS, CRCs - blinkered, self-pleasuring egomaniacal* shit-weasels that regenerate in successive lifeforms.

    They stroke their egos, pocket the cash then clear off.

    Wank; Bank; Thanks - & goodbye.

    *Egomania is preoccupation with one's self and applies to anyone who follows one's own ungoverned impulses and is possessed by delusions of personal greatness. Grayling, Romeo, Brennan, Spurr...

    ReplyDelete
  3. latest from RRP -
    Dear Colleagues,

    This week our inspection reports for both DLNR and SWM will be issued. DLNR CRCs report is published today, Tuesday 3rd March. SWM CRCs report will be published on Thursday 5th March and until then, SWM details should not be shared outside of our organisation. In both areas we received the rating of requires improvement, the same rating we received last year.













    Under organisational development we were rated as requiring improvement in both leadership and staff areas and good in services and information and facilities.



    In CRC specific work we received a rating of good for community payback and outstanding for Through the Gate which was previously rated inadequate in SWM.



    Women’s services provision, our range of interventions and our partnership work was praised.



    In case supervision however we were rated as inadequate in all four areas of assessment, planning implementation review. This is a big disappointment and concern that our considerable efforts between the last two inspections to improve case supervision has not resulted in an improved rating for these services. It should be noted that some aspects of case management did receive more favourable ratings such as desistance and engaging service users. However, in all geographical areas how activity to keep people safe was rated as inadequate, therefore, the overall rating for this domain was moderated down.



    Please take the time to read the reports as this will give you the best sense of the findings. Many of you will have attended a local briefing to discuss the reports and the ratings. It is acknowledged that we have had many challenges but our absolute priority moving forward is to maintain our positive ratings whilst in case management it will be ‘Improving our practice to keep people safe to a sufficient HMIP standard whilst achieving the supporting performance targets’



    We should also note that due to the timings of our inspections, improvements we have been busy making may not have been evident in the cases that were inspected.



    Nonetheless we must accept the findings of HMIP and take actions to address our case management deficits and learn from our successes in our other areas. Public protection and keeping all people safe has to be our priority focus moving forward, building on our strengths where we are doing the right thing currently .



    We now have finalised improvement plans and will communicate further on these in the next couple of weeks. Some of our plans include :

    · Raising quality in public protection – making time and space for professional discussion and learning from real examples of good practice

    · Refocusing with PDMs their current responsibilities to help them to support teams to achieve

    · Additional resources from the national probation service ( in quality oversight and learning and development ) reviewing opportunities around secondments in line with transitions planning and posts focused on safeguarding work

    · Revising and relooking at administration processes and support

    · Reviewing our operating model



    It’s been encouraging to hear your feedback so far at briefings, as part of our work we will be setting up meetings with staff groups so please continue to talk to your managers about ideas or solutions that can help in your area.



    There were some very positive areas highlighted in these inspections so whilst we have work to do in this critical area we should also look to where we have succeeded knowing that we can achieve this and build confidence in our delivery.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay. Hello Tom.

    https://strategyjourney.com/2017/03/02/target-operating-model-that-delivers/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The term Target Operating Model (or TOM) has been used a lot in many of the organisations that I have worked for all around the world, from London, to Mexico City, to Moscow, to Sydney, to Johannesburg, to Singapore, to Shanghai, and all the way away in Sao Paulo too. Many 100s of millions of dollars in business change budget has been invested in TOM projects all over the world. Many 1000s of people have worked in these TOM projects too.

      Having run so many, I’ve seen all possible outcomes. Some have succeeded in delivering very beneficial outcomes for their organisations. Some have failed to deliver anything. There can be many reasons for this; they couldn’t raise the budget, couldn’t get off the ground, they couldn’t get the buy-in needed from stakeholders, or they were based on the wrong motivations and outcomes to begin with.

      Delete
  5. The draft TOM further erodes role boundaries and there is no commitment to there not being localised redundancies, just no national campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have thoroughly reviewed the newly published TOM and can confirm it is an excellent model.

    ReplyDelete
  7. And still no comment from NAPO.
    I’m embarrassed by their silence even if they aren’t.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What do we expect this battle is one that napo will not utter a word over as they have lost the input of membership in the way the officers have allowed the GS to choke the lifeblood of the association. No professional dialogue for years. automated robotic expectations and very little being actively done other than to service the basic functions to continue waiting for their inevitable crash. Napo need to refocus save the structure and combine into a bigger union a proper union where staff will have some prospect of proper support.

      Delete
    2. @23:04 - agreed. May I suggest a minor edit?

      "No professional dialogue for years and very little being actively done other than to service the basic functions to continue waiting for their inevitable cash."

      Delete
  8. “While working in probation is frequently seen as a vocation, the role still demands and deserves a clear framework for professional development. Our workforce strategy will be driven by the aim to retain and recruit the best people from diverse backgrounds, ensure our staff have the right support and skills they need, and provide them with professionally rewarding career paths.”

    In reality probation pays a shit salary, expects free overtime, gives qualifications that do not transfer to other professionals, and conducts intrusive background checks on probation staff.

    ReplyDelete