Wednesday 4 July 2018

A New Dawn at Napo?

Despite an astonishingly low turnout in the recent ballot for General Secretary, I notice there are definite signs of change afoot at Napo. In launching her campaign for National Chair, Katie Lomas has taken the bold decision to start blogging and enter into direct dialogue with members. 

To be fair she has been an active contributor on Facebook for some time and it will be interesting to see if a new era of realism, openness and honesty is to be ushered in at Napo and that seeks to emulate the fine example set by Mike Rolfe in his recent bid for election as General Secretary:-
 
Publishing today…

I have been writing about all things Napo for some time, some articles have been published and some haven’t! Here I intend to bring together things I’ve published along with thoughts and discussion about my life as a Napo Officer. I want to make it easier to have discussions with more people so comments will be open on most of my articles and posts. Please use comments wisely, I will not be moderating them constantly but will remove any that are a personal attack on anyone or that I believe are against Napo’s objects.

I am publishing my blog now as I submit my nomination for Napo National Chair. There are many challenges ahead for Napo members, whichever employer they work for and there are many challenges for us as a Union. I have invested four years in my role as Vice Chair of Napo and have learned so much in that time. My second and final term of office is almost over but I have work yet to do. Our Trade Union is a precious and valuable thing but in recent years it has seen attack after attack. We have weathered many storms and there will be more to come. My vision for Napo in the future is as a vibrant and independent Trade Union and Professional Association, one that can adapt quickly to changing demands, both external and internal. I want to see a Union that communicates with members, collectively and individually. I want to hear a strong voice representing the professions of our members in Probation and Family Courts.

I am not unaware of the difficulties that we face. Napo reps are seeing workloads increase in both their work and trade union roles. Changes in both Probation and Cafcass have resulted in us losing many of our most experienced reps and activists (although some stay on as retired members). We need to revitalise our branches, making sure that reps and branch officers can work efficiently, using all of the central support available to them. We need to make sure that our NEC and it’s committees work well, allowing members to directly participate in setting the agenda and priorities for the Union. The most common question I hear from members is “what is happening about xxxx”. We need to make sure that members have access to information in a variety of media.

For lots of reasons it feels as though we are at an important point in time. In Probation we have the Justice Select Committee confirming all we in Napo have said about the devastating effects of TR. In Cafcass there is acknowledgement that workloads need urgent attention and that the service is being held up largely by goodwill and dedication of staff. PBNI (Probation Board of Northern Ireland) avoided the worst of the disastrous attempts at reform of Probation but struggles around workloads and protections for staff continue. With so much happening Napo needs to capitalise on every opportunity. We must make the most of the position we are in.

I look forward to discussing these issues with you further – feel free to share your thoughts in comments…


Katie Lomas

26 comments:

  1. I don't see any problem with Katie Lomas moderating personal abuse, but moderating what 'I believe are against Napo's objects [sic]'- I presume she means Napo's objectives – is less clear-cut. I think when it comes to objectives there needs to be considerable tolerance if her blog is not to be too top-down. It's obvious from this blog that the expression of quite legitimate and critical views about Napo's organisation raise the hackles of those in hierarchies. In just a few years Napo's membership had dropped from 9000 to 5000, there is poor member engagement and the branch structure is disintegrating. To my mind the most powerful position in Napo should be vested in the national chair and not those it employs, however senior.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only project I am aware of Katie lomas involvement is Job Evaluations for E3. Every job was downgraded with the exception of A.P Grade 5 to Grade 6! Is this success? She has been part of the silent Co-Chair top table team for 4 years and has no notoriety, or member achievements to offer. Ms Lomas is part of the prevailing culture that requires change in NAPO if we have any chance of a future. It always amazes me that when an individual stands to gain personal reward, they suddenly become vocal - lets not forget the very generous facility time, expenses, london accommodation and travel costs people get in significant union roles - it beats being worked to death as a Probation Officer in local offices. Lets hope more worthy, hard working reps will be encouraged to come forward for this opportunity. New strategy please General Secretary

    ReplyDelete
  3. Richard Johnson who you featured way back has revisited the probation outsourcing disaster again this week.

    https://buyingqp.com/2018/07/03/right-grayling-wrong-crime/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who is this person and what has she done for members over the 4 years then?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. Downgraded VLO pay
      2. Made a mess of chairing AGM and a whole half day's business had to be re-run again
      3. Demonstrated a lack of understanding of how a union operates.
      4. Is a poor chair
      I could go on but don't want to waste my valuable time.
      Being national officer is not a training scheme! Candidates should come to these roles with the skills and ability to do the job well.

      Delete
    2. 5. Allowed staff to be Vetted despite already having current DBS certificates.
      6. Allowed staff that failed Vetting (through no fault of their own) to be forced to resign or move to new roles.

      Delete
    3. On employment law terms that is not on and a winable easy argument. To not take that issue forwards in claims and dispute is incompetence at its best.

      Delete
  5. I hope and expect there will be other candidates for this early pre election notice as we read here. Hoping other are running for the top Job. The candidates have 250 words on a statement but as we can see the rules do not seem to apply these days. This candidate actually says nothing on what she is standing on . having been part of the lacklustre and failing officers group to date the last thing we want is the same old back in higher leadership and control. Having served 4 years already and achieved very little than to have appeared to have sold out on many member issues. Lacks appropriate range of skills .

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have no particular axa to grind with Katie Lomas however anybody standing for union office who fails to mention wages terms and conditions would struggle to get my vote.
    These are my priorities, what I go to work for, and what unites rather than divides us.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's more of the same

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What not another 25 or so elections specials where this blog favours one candidate? The worst least able ambition over ability? Yes more of the same unproven untested candidates.

      Delete
    2. Anon 21:13 I will remind you that one candidate was not willing to engage and they rather hoped it would prevent any discussion or debate about their credentials or aptitude for the job.

      Delete
    3. Jim, I am not 21.13. For me, I was concerned about your rush to peddle the lies about IL. There were sufficient truthful issues to raise without using unsubstantiated rubbish. You really need to think carefully about your sources and the links between them and this candidate.

      Delete
    4. "There were sufficient truthful issues to raise without using unsubstantiated rubbish."

      The borderline between the two is always a matter of conjecture, assessment and judgement.

      Delete
    5. What links this candidate sounds doubtful already.

      Delete
    6. Anon at 17:30 You can carry on huffing and puffing all you like but I'm completely comfortable with the way the blog handled the General Secretary election and things were not derailed by one candidate refusing to engage.

      Delete
    7. Exactly nothing derailed as IL was elected as he rightly should have been and the hopeful opportunist lacked the skills. Had he have shown any light of the facts he would have gotten wider support and you gaffed along with him. There can be no respect for that when you were clearly wrong you blamed a clerical error and that is not true is it? No huffing here but the truth is integrity based come on restore the faith.

      Delete
    8. 20:17 It was an election, one candidate decided to engage and one didn't. I stick by what I said.

      Delete
    9. I have deleted the offensive response to this as my patience has been exhausted. Comment moderation has been reinstated.

      Delete
    10. Jim you are awake far too early! How your patience resources renew. The above poster is certainly a provoking blighter who would better serve IL's interests by retweeting Ian's tweets,replying to them and/or posting responses to Ian's blog (as virtually no one else does). If this poster so admires IL they could better use that energy by positively promoting him

      Delete
    11. No fan just tell the truth and the comment censor sulk offers some insight. You are not thinking wide enough it is not just simpley replace and pay up .

      Delete
    12. This young woman does not have the life experience, let alone the skills and knowledge to do the top job. A disaster waiting to happen.
      Haven't we suffered enough?

      Delete
  8. I've come out of NAPO, I need the £20 monthly subs more than them due to lack of increase in takehome pay and over the years I've paid approx. £5k in subs with nil return. I can't afford to pay £240 per year for a potential accompaniment at an ARM or disciplinary meeting cos that's all I would benefit from it for.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am someone who was disappointed with the GS election, the result, the turnout, but most of all the process which was blocked by rules which don’t appear in the consitirution and sought to block ordinary members access to both candidates effectively screening them for scrutiny. There seems to be some good competition for candidates for National Vice chair this year as well as a straight shoot for chair. There are also candidates on the ballot that are not marred with the ineptitude and lethargy of the officers group over the last five or six years. NAPO needs to change radically in its approach and the manner in which it holds its paid officials to account or sadly we will cease to exist, absorbed into some lumbering juggernaught of a Union as just another sector under their umbrella. I for one will support any candidate that looks to support the professional association aspect of our union and offers a breathe of fresh air in to the top table

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On your bike po centric rubbush small selfish interests are not union values there are many non po non professional staff paying their too . Oh they don't count as long as their money backs your out of date interests.

      Delete