As the stranglehold of civil service command and control gets tighter by the day, the job is getting less recognisable, less worthwhile and less rewarding. This from today:-
There's an SPO job going in my office so I'm going through the usual angst ridden internal monologue about whether to apply again. Do I want to go through the emotional trauma of trying and failing once more? Can I actually dance like a corporate monkey through the bullshit process only to see someone significantly less experienced and able than me get the job.I kind of want to do it so I can try to be a human middle manager and find a path through the bollocks. One that enables people to retain their humanity and preserve their mental health whilst being effective. You know the kind if thing. But, I'm not going to bother. The straw that broke the camel's back? I just worked out that I would take home a princely seventy quid a month more than I get now. As my old grannie used to say. Fuck that shit! £17.50 a week for all that extra shit and responsibility? Are you having a laugh?
When next negotiating a deal on pay and T & C's maybe our trade unions and employers might wake up to the reality that able and experienced staff face. We need a clear and achievable continuous professional development framework. One that rewards dedication and ability. One that motivates people to want to progress and one that takes away the reliance on a single interview performance which tells recruiters nothing about how equipped a candidate actually is to do the job.
--oo00oo--
Probation Officer - NPS National Security Unit-Midlands
The National Probation Service is creating a specialist, dedicated and highly skilled National Security Division, which will provide an enhanced level of management and intervention for the most high-risk, complex and high-profile offenders in the community.
The National Security Division will be based across 5 geographical units covering North of England, the Midlands, Wales and the South West, East of England and South Central and London and Kent, Surrey and Sussex. Each unit will have operational satellite locations. Main office Locations of the units are London, Cardiff, Manchester, Reading and Birmingham. The units will be responsible for the management of national security cases outside of the NPS regional structures. Each unit will be managed by a Head of Operational Function working to the Deputy Director of NPS Critical Public Protection Operations. Specialist staff will deliver an enhanced set of national standards to the management of terrorist offenders, serious organised criminals and other critical public protection cases.
The National Security Unit North covers North East, North West, Greater Manchester and Yorkshire and Humberside Probation regions-we welcome applications from across all these regions. Routine travel across geographical areas will be expected and a driving licence is desirable.
These are new posts which will be critical in the new approach the NPS is adopting to the management of terrorist and other high-risk offenders.
Overview of the job
Post holders will undertake the full range of offender management tasks with offenders under supervision including assessment, sentence implementation and producing reports; utilising service procedures and practice directions to underpin professional judgement.
Summary
To assess and manage the risk posed by offenders to protect victims of crime and the general the public by:
Providing information and advice to criminal courts, other criminal justice agencies and partner organisations
Supervise offenders subject to community orders and licences and during custodial sentences
Contribute to the management of risk
Work with other agencies and groups to prevent crime and meet the needs of victims and offenders
In line with NPS policies and procedures, the job holder must at all times demonstrate a commitment to equality and inclusion and an understanding of their relevance to the work they undertake. The post holder must adhere to all policies in respect of the sensitive/confidential nature of the information handled whilst working in this position.
--oo00oo--
Responsibilities, Activities & Duties appear to be standard and there are a significant number of posts currently advertised with 8 based in the Midlands and 6 for the North East, North West, Yorkshire and Humber region. The 10 SPO posts were advertised last month with a closing date of 24th September:-
Senior Probation Officer - NPS National Security Division
Specific tasks and responsibilities for this role will be:
Manage specialist teams to deliver enhanced national standards to national security cases;
Promote and develop practice of a core group approach, incorporating psychologists and polygraph leads, to assessment and case management;
Manage cases effectively across boundaries ensuring effective relationships with Regional PDUs;
Ensure effective identification and early allocation of national security cases from OMiC;
Provide support on MAPPA, liaising with regional MAPPA leads and partners at the local level;
Provide local engagement with senior leads for Approved Premises;
Deliver integrated working practices with law enforcement partners at regional level;
Ensure delivery models utilise the expertise of probation and intervention leads within JExU;
Ensure staff receive appropriate, up to date training and support
There will be a requirement for SPOs within the National Security Division to apply for an enhanced level of vetting and to hold DV clearance. Routine travel across geographical areas will be expected. These are new posts which will be critical in the new approach the NPS is adopting to the management of terrorist and other high-risk offenders.
--oo00oo--
Finally, a heads-up for tomorrow 13th October 3:50pm - Ian Lawrence, Katie Lomas and Ben Priestley will be giving oral evidence to the Justice Select Committee's enquiry into the Future of the Probation Service. Should be interesting.
Meanwhile another MoJ 'jobs boost' announced today:-
ReplyDeleteHMPs Guys Marsh (Dorset), Rye Hill (Warwickshire) and Stocken (Rutland) will benefit from additional houseblocks and High Down (Surrey) will get a new workshop – the latest step in a £2.5 billion commitment to create 10,000 modern prison places.
The new buildings will allow for more than 930 places, supporting the construction industry amid the Coronavirus pandemic and generating scores of long-term jobs in jails.
Planning permission is being sought for works to begin, and the first prisoners are expected to arrive from Winter 2022 at Rye Hill jail, and throughout 2023 at the remaining sites. Construction work across the 4 prisons is expected to cost around £200 million.
Prisons and Probation Minister, Lucy Frazer QC MP, said:
This significant step in our plan to transform the prison estate shows the government’s intention to invest in infrastructure, create jobs and to build back better for this country.
The new houseblocks will provide modern environments where we can effectively rehabilitate offenders and steer them away from crime.
The project will see capacity increase by 180 places at HMP Guys Marsh, 462 at HMP Rye Hill and 206 at HMP Stocken, where a further new houseblock was opened in June 2019. HMP High Down’s new workshop will free up space for 90 extra places in the existing prison building as it moves toward an extended focus on work and training opportunities for offenders.
The buildings are another major step in the programme to create 10,000 additional prison places, delivering modern jails that boost rehabilitation prospects and cut reoffending.
Four new prisons are to be built across England over the next 6 years. A new jail will be constructed at HMP Full Sutton, in East Yorkshire, and work is underway to identify sites in the North-West of England and the South-East.
In addition to the 4 new prisons, construction is well underway on HMP Five Wells, the new jail at Wellingborough in Northamptonshire, and early works have started at Glen Parva, Leicestershire, to create two new 1,680-place category C resettlement prisons.
The new capacity underpins the government’s sweeping sentencing reforms, published in a landmark White Paper last month, which will see the most serious criminals serve longer behind bars.
I can only imagine the dreadful tinder profile someone will have to create in order to join NPS National Security. Methinks its yet another layer of well-paid power-dressing pocket-liners so that NPS can accomodate the CRC manageement. Corrupt chumocracy; you kiss my ass & I'll kiss yours.
ReplyDeleteStomach churning nepotism. I'm sure CRC staff will already know who's lined up for those plum PO & SPO positions on enhanced salaries.
Its All Perfectly Normal
ReplyDeleteCan't you see? It all makes perfect sense
DeleteExpressed in dollars and cents
Pounds, shillings, and pence
Can't you see? It all makes perfect sense
Time is linear
Memory's a stranger
History's for fools
(all courtesy that bloody Roger Waters bloke)
NPS Head of Operational Function (Head of Unit - National Security Division)
ReplyDeleteSalary Minimum £56,657 - £74,112
Number of jobs available 5
Region National
Organisation Grade for HMPPS
NPS Pay Band C
Post Type Permanent
Working Pattern Full Time
Role Type Senior Leadership
Closing Date: 10/07/2020, 23:55 hours.
These are new posts which will be critical in the new approach the NPS is adopting to the management of terrorist and other high-risk offenders.
The National Security Division will be based across 5 geographical units covering North of England, the Midlands, Wales and the South West and 2 units covering London and the South East. Each unit will have operational satellite locations. Locations of the units are to be finalised but are likely to be based in London (x2), Cardiff, Manchester and Birmingham.
Success Profiles will enable a fairer and more inclusive method of recruitment by enabling us to assess the range of experiences, abilities, strengths, behaviours and technical/professional skills required for different roles. This flexible approach to recruitment focuses more on finding the right candidate for the specific role.
Lets do a head count - 14 POs, 10 SPOs, 5 Heads of Unit
Oh, hang on, there's more...
Deletemappa administrators x5, case administrators x?, senior admin x5...
And what's the current vacancy rate for Probation staff?
and more... Unit Business Manager – NPS National Security Unit x 5
Delete"Probation officers overstretched and under-resourced, says Inspectorate"
The National Security Division seems a little MI5ish to me, and far detached from my own perception of what probation is all about.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the post I was left wondering if it is all really control and command, or is their a particular level within probation that are not only willing participants, but actually pushing such agenda?
Probation has changed, and so too have some of the mindsets the service attracts.
I've recently read the following paper which may be of interest to some others.
"Indeed, the best evidence pertaining to the occupational identities of probation workers comes from a recent study by Mawby and Worrall (2013) . 3 This timely research revealed three ‘types’ of probation workers (‘lifers’, ‘second careerists’ and ‘offender managers’), distinguished principally by how they were trained and when they joined the service. ‘Lifers’ were those workers with only one, usually very long, career, and for whom probation might be described as a vocation; ‘second careerists’ arrived in probation from former careers in health, social work or elsewhere and ‘offender managers’, the most recent recruits, were predominantly young, pragmatic and adaptable."
https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article/56/1/161/2462326
'Getafix
I am a lifer. Very proud of that. No problem with newbies and careerists and second homers, trouble is, the Great Grayling Clearout and resultant panicked recruitment drive means that there isnt going to be a sensible balance of oldies and newbies. My own experience is that a lot of young, pragmatic and adaptable recruits joined up for exactly the same reasons I did way back in the last century, and they are pretty miserable and the pay isnt enough to keep them in,
DeleteI was recently reminded of some of the essential criteria for acceptance into training via the CQSW course in the 20th.C - age 25+, min 300hrs verifiable, relevant experience (paid or voluntary), written 2000 word submission in response to a set question, interviews with a heavyweight academic, Home Office body & Probation Tutor... then after completing a rigorous fulltime academic course incl. placements, & assuming you had passed, you were competing for a handful of jobs nationwide. Then you had probationary First Year Officer status to contend with before you were a 'confirmed' PO. You had to want to do the job. It wasn't a meal-ticket to a degree or a gap-year stocking-filler.
DeleteThere seem to be hundreds of unfilled & newly created posts at the moment, all advertised via agencies on silly-money hourly rates attracting a new itinerant workforce who are happy to do bits&bobs here&there without commitment, earning up to twice as much as the permanent posts.
Meal ticket? How does that work then, as you need at least a level 5 to get on PQIP...?
DeleteLevels? And they go as high as five?
DeleteGod bless America!
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/13/sage-documents-show-how-coronavirus-scientists-felt-sidelined-by-economic-considerations
ReplyDeleteThese documents appear to mark the point at which the science of handling an infectious disease epidemic lost out to economic considerations.
What is unusual about these Sage documents?
The timing of their release, for a start. In the interests of transparency (in response to pressure) the government has been releasing Sage minutes around lunchtime on a Friday for many months. These documents were published at 8.20pm on a Monday, within an hour of the prime minister’s press conference in which he described the new three-tier system of restrictions on areas with high numbers of Covid infections. That makes them look very like a dissenting opinion.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/justice-data-lab-statistics-october-2020
ReplyDeleteThis analysis looked at the reoffending behaviour of 79 individuals who participated in a Penrose CJS intervention in the London area. The overall results show that those who took part in the intervention had a lower one-year proven reoffending rate, and lower reoffending frequency compared to a matched comparison group.
Penrose’s community team are based in every London borough, working predominantly in London CRC offices. In the Responsible Officer (RO) role, they assume very similar responsibilities to other probation offender managers, which incorporate assessment, referrals to and partnership working with relevant support services, one-to-one work on the causes ofoffending behaviour, risk management and escalation, and enforcement of the order of the court where necessary. Penrose ROs use the same processes and systems as their CRC and NPS counterparts, including OASys and nDelius. Responsible Officers support service users through the duration of their Post Sentence Supervision (PSS).
The Social Interest Group (SIG) is made up of subsidiary charities that collectively believe that everyone has the right to live a positive and healthy life.
We are experts in working with adults who have the most complex and chaotic lives; enabling and empowering them to take charge of themselves, giving them the skills and resilience to live healthy and fulfilled lives.
All our services operate according to the principles of Psychologically Informed Environments (PIE), where we reflect on what we are doing and how we can be more effective.
We do this in collaboration with our Service Users to help us to understand their needs, including the importance of the physical surroundings and the impact they have on the health and wellbeing of Service Users and staff.
We train our staff in Trauma Informed Care and the principles of Compassion Focused Therapy to help them become more resilient and competent to work with people who may have multiple and complex needs.
NPS Pay Award 2020/21 – Important Update
ReplyDeleteWe would like to notify you that as part of the 20/21 Pay Award those NPS staff eligible for pay progression, who are not already at the top of their pay band, will have this paid and backdated to 1 April 2020, in their October pay. This will include backpay in relation to unsocial hours payments and overtime earned since this date.
The remainder of the Pay Award is still under negotiation with Trade Union colleagues and we are hopeful to reach an agreement shortly which will then be subject to ballot by Trade Union members.
We thank our Trade Union colleagues for their cooperation and tireless advocacy on behalf of their members, and thank our NPS staff for your patience whilst we continue to negotiate and settle an Award for this year.
Previously in disastrous ferry news...
ReplyDeleteGrayling sparked outrage when it emerged he had awarded a £13.8 million contract to Seaborne Freight – a company with no ships – to mitigate the potential consequences of a no-deal Brexit.
A total of £100 million in contracts was awarded to three companies – Brittany Ferries, DFDS and Seaborne – but they were ultimately scrapped at an estimated cost of £56.6 million after Brexit was delayed.
And today... Four ferry firms have landed government contracts worth a total of £77.6m to provide post-Brexit freight capacity.
Brittany Ferries, DFDS, P&O Ferries and Stena Line will have the job of ensuring medical supplies and other vital goods continue to get to the UK.
Sadly no sign of Seaborne in the new list [sarcasm alert]
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/13/covid-jenrick-defends-decision-to-ignore-sages-lockdown-advice
ReplyDeleteWhen you can happily defend & fundraise for those who annex someone else's territory, destroy Palestinian homes and lives, then build new settlements on that land - you must think *anything* is acceptable.
When you can claim taxpayer money to fund £multi-million properties, drive around the country in breach of lockdown rules & bend the planning rules to suit your own needs, you must feel untouchable.
"Its all perefectly normal"
Perhaps Jenrick can help out Tony at JCB?
Delete"The British heavy machinery firm JCB’s sale of equipment used in the destruction of Palestinian villages in the Israeli-occupied West Bank is being examined by a UK government body to determine whether its due diligence process complies with human rights guidelines set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The chair of JCB is Anthony Bamford, a Conservative peer. The company gave Johnson £25,000 for his leadership campaign. Overall the firm has given the Conservatives more than £10m since 2010, according to the Electoral Commission.
JCB had defended itself to the National Contact Point by saying that it simply sold its equipment to a third-party Israeli distributor, Comasco, and therefore had no responsibility over what was done with the equipment thereafter."
Wancock is having issues with his own govt:
ReplyDelete"[in the leaked Sage report] the government’s scientific advisers (Sage) warned that “low levels of engagement” with the [test and trace] system, coupled with testing delays and likely poor rates of self-isolation suggested “this system is having a marginal impact on transmission at the moment”.
In true Johnson-esque style, Wancock's response was:
The health secretary insisted the system was significantly bigger than in most other countries. “When I talk to my international colleagues, they asked the question ‘how did you manage to build this capacity, so fast’, and that is the truth of it,” he said. “To argue that the enormous system that is working so effectively with so many brilliant people working on it … is at the at the root of this challenge is, unfortunately, to miss the big picture..."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/13/hancock-turns-on-tory-lockdown-sceptics-ahead-of-key-covid-votes
Today's Napo Mailout:-
ReplyDeleteHMPPS introduce new policy on the wearing of Face Masks
Napo along with the other probation unions were consulted yesterday on a major change of policy from HMPPS on the wearing of face masks in their premises within prisons and the NPS. From October the HMPPS have decided to make Fluid Resistant Surgical Masks (FRSMs) available to all HMPPS staff – and in the majority of workplaces the wearing of this face mask will be mandatory for all staff (please see below for more details).
The FRSMs meet the criteria for Personal Protective Equipment, which is internationally approved and is intended to be worn to catch the microorganisms shed in liquid drops and aerosols from the wearer’s mouth and nose, they also provide limited protection to the wearer from others who may cough in close proximity.
This change in policy is being introduced at speed taking into account the findings learnt from prison outbreaks which have shown that staff represent the greatest transmission risk; also in light of the fact that there are live outbreaks of the virus in both prison and probation - and because we now seem to be in a second wave of the Covid pandemic. Given the speed of the introduction of the new strategy there are likely to be further changes to the policy in the near future.
The FRSM is available in two ways under the new HMPPS strategy:
PPE – where it is required by either national or local risk assessment, it is classified as PPE and must be worn.
Personal choice – in all other areas not covered by risk assessment as above where staff can opt to wear a FRSM. For instance, due their medical vulnerability to the virus or their personal situation.
HMPPS have applied a three tier hierarchy of control to the wearing of the FRSMs, which broadly will work as follows:
The top two tiers apply to areas of work where face mask wearing is already mandated in either the national or local risk assessments, safe operating procedure or delivery model. A staff member cannot opt out of wearing a face mask where it is mandated. With the third level, the wearing of face masks will not be mandatory (this is in part to reflect Government guidance) and applies where face masks are optional, as PPE is not required for the task/workplace. If there are health reasons that prevent the wearing of face masks this should be discussed as part of individual risk assessments. Equally, consideration should be given if there are religious reasons that prevent the wearing of face masks
All employers being urged to adopt this policy
At our meeting Napo asked if this change in strategy would also apply to CRC staff. We were told that when HMPPS team meet with CRCs this week they will state in the strongest terms that the they should apply the same policy – but we were told they cannot enforce this strategy on the CRCs. We also raised an issue as to the possible provision of transparent/translucent face masks for those working in interventions and other areas of work where it was important to be able to see facial expressions. In response the HMPPS said they were looking into this. Napo will be pressing CRC employers as well as Cafcass and Probation Northern Ireland to urgently follow this policy.
Napo broadly welcomes this change in strategy, which will give our NPS members some additional protection in the workplace over and above that of face coverings – and this was something that we had been calling for. But these masks still only give a low standard of protection against the virus, a face-fitted FFP3 mask is required for the highest level of protection. We raised this point at the meeting – and the HMPP responded that the new strategy and provision of FRSM masks was in line with Government and Public Health advice.
DeleteGiven the limited protection afforded by the FRSM it is vital that the other control measures such as two-meter social distancing and the washing of hands (Hands, Face, Space) are strictly followed (it is also important that our members read the full strategy when it comes through to you as there is a lot more information in it that we have space for in this bulletin).
Napo demands better communication
The National NPS Health and Safety meeting takes place today where we will have another opportunity to raise additional questions about how HMPPS will be protecting those members of staff who are extremely vulnerable to the virus, and how they will protect all staff, particularly in areas of the country where there is a high level of Covid-19 infection and what steps will be taken to protect staff during the winter months when transmission rates are likely to continue to rise. Following the above news Napo has already been receiving direct concerns from members of Parliament and the Lords during last night’s meeting of the Justice Unions Parliamentary Group about the need for a better interface between senior leaders in Probation, Prison and the Courts Services with local authorities, as we enter the new three tier system for monitoring and suppressing the spread of the Covid virus as announced by the Prime Minister today.
AGM 2020 declared a success!
Many members have been in touch with Napo over the weekend to congratulate the Staff and Officers for helping to deliver the first ever ‘virtual’ Annual General Meeting. Despite the inevitable glitches that occasionally took place, it still proved possible to debate motions, formally sign off the annual accounts and work of the year and complete the accountability session.
In addition, we were able to hear from all of our scheduled keynote speakers and conduct a range of excellent professional sessions and fringe meetings. We wanted to reciprocate the kind words that have reached us by saying that the biggest thanks should go to our loyal members from the NPS, CRC’s, Cafcass and PBNI whose excellent contributions and patience made it all possible.
Work is in hand to produce an online summary of the AGM and more news on this will follow in due course.
Napo at the Justice Select Committee (JSC)
Napo National Chair Katie Lomas and General Secretary Ian Lawrence along with UNISON were among the panel of trade unions who presented oral evidence to today’s JSC meeting on the second major reform of Probations Services in recent years.
You can view the session and Napo’s contribution on www.parliamenttv
So are face masks going to be mandatory in the office or not?
ReplyDeleteThis from the FDA explains why those surgical blue paper masks are absolutely pointless.
“While a surgical mask may be effective in blocking splashes and large-particle droplets, a face mask, by design, does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. Surgical masks also do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants because of the loose fit between the surface of the mask and your face.”
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-infection-control/n95-respirators-surgical-masks-and-face-masks#s2
Lets look more closely at that FDA page:
Delete"It is important to recognize that the optimal way to prevent airborne transmission is to use a combination of interventions from across the hierarchy of controls, not just PPE alone."
The CDC recommends that members of the public use simple cloth face coverings when in a public setting to slow the spread of the virus, since this will help people who may have the virus and do not know it from transmitting it to others... and the CDC always recommends everyday preventive actions, such as hand washing and maintaining at least 6 feet of social distancing
A surgical mask is a loose-fitting, disposable device that creates a physical barrier between the mouth and nose of the wearer and potential contaminants in the immediate environment.
*Note that the edges of the mask are not designed to form a seal around the nose and mouth.*
Surgical masks are not intended to be used more than once.
So face coverings/masks are a BARRIER, not an infallible defence. They form just one part of a series of defences.
In that respect face coverings are very effective.
"HMPPS have decided to make Fluid Resistant Surgical Masks (FRSMs) available to all HMPPS staff"
Presumably HMPPS are aware that "Surgical masks are not intended to be used more than once."
A single mask should NOT be used multiple times. I would expect that a daily change would be the VERY MINIMUM definition of "once"; and probably twice a day would be closer to an acceptable definition of a single use.
Napo?
And yes, clear face guards for those who need to lipread or respond to facial expressions are ESSENTIAL.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-07-08-oxford-covid-19-study-face-masks-and-coverings-work-act-now
DeleteThe study found:
Cloth face coverings are effective in protecting the wearer and those around them.
Behavioural factors are involved, including how people understand the virus and their perceptions of risk, trust in experts and government, can adversely affect mask wearing.
Face masks need to be seen as part of ‘policy packages’ with other measures such as social distancing and hand hygiene.
Clear and consistent policies and public messaging are key to the adoption of wearing face masks and coverings by the general public
“ does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. Surgical masks also do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants”
DeleteSurgical masks are pointless against COVID.
Let’s isolate that;
Delete“does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes”
I really struggle to understand the level of resistance & refusal some people have to the simple wearing of a face covering that, to whatever small degree, will contribute to reducing the spread of respiratory infections in concert with handwashing, physical distancing and all other responsible behaviours, e.g. isolating oneself as & when necessary, reporting symptoms, taking a test as appropriate.
DeleteAnd failing that, it demonstrates a level of respect for others' well-being. Even if its only symbolic as opposed to totally effective.
But no doubt someone will pop-up to tell everyone that not wearing a mask "is perfectly normal."
There is no evidence to say cloth face coverings are effective. The government has made it socially unacceptable not to wear one. The same government that has failed.
Deletei'm in a NW CRC and despite the tier3 lockdown we're still to get people into the office if they are complex. Bizarre decision and a minefield to enforce. Local offices shut and offenders forced to covid-ready offices further afield. Only 2 interview rooms available so co-ordinating appointments with other members of staff is nigh on impossible - it only works if everyone turns up at the exact time they're supposed to, mine was 10 mins late so i only had 20mins of interview time and he's a complex case!! We need to close all NW crc offices again.
ReplyDeleteThey need to close all Probation offices. They are rarely Covid-safe.
DeleteSorry to hear you’re in the NW. Do not wait for probation to act appropriately. They will not.
"My Hancock's bigger than yours"
ReplyDelete"My Johnsons bigger than yours"
Is this what this govt & Brexit has reduced UK international relations to?