Probation Changes Bulletin - Issue 7
This bulletin provides an update to you, our stakeholders, on the progress of HM Prison & Probation Service’s probation reform, workforce and recovery programmes.
1. Introduction from Amy Rees, Director General of Probation and Wales
Welcome to the latest bulletin, reporting on key updates and progress across our three probation programmes – reform, workforce and recovery. You will read more from Jim Barton and Ian Barrow below.
As we move into the Autumn season, we have updated our recovery measures across England and Wales to be able to respond to the introduction of local restrictions. For the Probation System, we remain prepared and ready with delivery and contingency plans in place to enable our regions to adapt quickly to changing circumstances. It remains key that we balance our recovery with ongoing and changing requirements. Our focus, as always, is on the safety of our people – our staff, those under our supervision and the public.
As well as a high level of activity across our programmes, there is a real impetus across the probation system in general. You will no doubt have seen or heard the Lord Chancellor recently setting out the government’s proposals for changes to the sentencing and release framework in the new White Paper. This includes key considerations for probation work and community sentence management so we are thinking about what this will mean for our future design work and we will be closely monitoring how the paper progresses.
We have also had confirmation that Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) has secured planning permission to open a new Approved Premises with 26 bed spaces in the South West of England. We are expecting the new site to be operational from the beginning of the next financial year. Our Approved Premises play a critical role in resettling offenders transitioning from prison to the community and this is part of our plan to expand capacity and improve security across our current Approved Premises estate, so that an extra 1,700 prison leavers will receive closer supervision each year.
Planning for the winter months and the possible scenarios we may face continues to be a major focus for us. We have learnt a great deal from the way we have responded to coronavirus
I hope you find this bulletin helpful and we look forward to updating you on the latest developments in the next issue.
2. Update from Jim Barton, SRO, Probation Reform Programme
Since our last update, the reform programme has continued adapting and updating our plans, following the changes to probation announced in June by the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC MP. We remain on track for the safe and stable transition to the NPS by June 2021.
Our Design Authority Board has recently agreed to make changes to our future delivery in some important areas, namely court work, sentence management, in-house unpaid work and accredited programmes, the victim contact scheme and resettlement support for those on remand. We published an update document to explain some of the changes made to reflect the impact of Covid-19. The details of what the announcement document means are incorporated into the on-going design work for our proposed future model for probation services with the final Target Operating Model due to be published in February 2021.
Our Final Business Case, which sets out the required levels of investment needed in the probation services, is being submitted to HM Treasury in November.
Finally, over 200 organisations have now submitted a response to qualify for the Probation Services Dynamic Framework. Bids have been received in the first competition, for education, training and employment services and on 28 September we launched the second competition, for accommodation services.
3. Update from Ian Barrow, SRO, Workforce Programme
I am pleased to update you on the considerable progress that the Workforce Programme has been making, following the launch of our new Workforce Strategy on July 30.
One of our key priorities, as set out in the Strategy, is to create a more diverse workforce where everyone feels included and supported. As part of this commitment, we have been holding a series of virtual workshops with NPS and CRC staff to help us better understand the current issues and what measures we need to take to achieve this ambition. The results of these workshops will be used as part of the development of the first Probation Workforce Equalities, Diversity and Inclusion Strategy, which we hope to launch early next year. The strategy aims to looking at ways to diversify entry routes, enhance qualification routes, improve staff experience, retention and career opportunities, and create schemes to advance under-represented groups into the probation workforce and senior leadership roles. We have been really excited by the level of interest and engagement so far!
In another key area, targeted at retaining talented people, we have also launched the Probation Service Officer (PSO) Progression Pilot. This Pilot gives experienced and able PSOs the opportunity to progress internally and qualify as a Probation Officer. It compresses the 21-month PQiP course into 13 months and is designed to allow those without a prior degree qualification to access the PQiP. This pilot is initially being trialed across the Eastern England, Kent, Surrey & Sussex, West and East Midlands regions.
These are just two examples of the work that we are doing as we implement our Workforce Strategy. We will continue to work closely with members of staff, probation leaders, trade unions, our key stakeholders and organisations as we develop and implement our plans.
4. Update from Ian Barrow, SRO, Recovery Programme
We continue to make good progress in our recovery work and are now moving through Step 3 of our Recovery Roadmap. We know that a tremendous amount of work is taking place across the probation system and we are extremely grateful for everyone’s contributions towards this.
We continue to review our exceptional delivery arrangements and are seeing steady increases in face to face appointments taking place; offices re-opening where it is safe to do so and in unpaid work delivery. We are now also able to re-commence programme delivery and so we are implementing an accredited programmes prioritisation framework.
Our approach to recovery remains that the health and safety of our staff, service users and the public is our primary priority. We continue to tailor what we do according to local circumstances, and we are supporting our probation regions in making the decisions which are right for them and what is happening in their areas. Where local lockdowns or additional restrictions are coming into effect, Regional Directors are ensuring they review their plans and make any changes necessary.
5. Hidden Heroes
On the 29th September, the Butler Trust in partnership with HMPPS organised Hidden Heroes Day to recognise and celebrate the outstanding work of our staff working in probation, prisons, courts, approved premises and youth justice every single day, particularly during this challenging time. Read more about #Hidden Heroes Day.
6. Stay in touch and have your say
We will be providing further updates as we continue to make progress this year. If you have any questions contact the reform programme team: strengthening.probation@justice.gov.uk
Sign up to receive updates on pages relating to Justice.
--oo00oo--
No longer a Napo member, I will be happy to publish any observations from the 2 day event either anonymously or attributable - contact email on profile page - thanks.
"Our Design Authority Board has recently agreed to make changes to our future delivery in some important areas, namely ..."
ReplyDelete... Everything.
Who is on this Design Authority Board? Let me guess - the usual 'excellent leaders' who wouldn't recognise excellence in a million years? The simple serpents who have been dissecting probation for the last decade? Bean Counters? Disciples of TOM?
This is the dark place where capitalism takes us:
ReplyDelete"The world’s billionaires “did extremely well” during the coronavirus pandemic, growing their already-huge fortunes to a record high of $10.2tn (£7.8tn).
A report by Swiss bank UBS found that billionaires increased their wealth by more than a quarter (27.5%) at the height of the crisis from April to July, just as millions of people around the world lost their jobs or were struggling to get by on government schemes.
The report found that billionaires had mostly benefited from betting on the recovery of global stock markets when they were at their nadir during the global lockdowns in March and April.
The research shows that UK billionaires donated much less [in total] than those from other countries:
- in the US, 98 billionaires donated a total of $4.5bn ($46m each)
- in China 12 billionaires gave $679m ($56.5 each)
- in Australia just two billionaires donated $324m ($161m each)
- in the UK, nine billionaires have donated just $298m ($33m each)
Today's post dosen't fill me with any real hope for the future of probation services.
ReplyDeleteThere's much talk of recovery, but the direction of travel seems to lead to a destination which seems miles away from my personal concept of what probation is, or should be.
Making the service more accessible to enter by fiddling about with qualification thresholds I feel is more to do with staff shortages rather then recovery.
Interesting article here. Interesting because it identifies UNISON as the probation union not NAPO.
https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/31435
'Getafix
On pay claims nafo only ever copy the unison bulletins original capable first drafts no longer come from Napo staff. The appointments are a from within the reduced rank on financial necessity and secretive loyalty to the incompetant general sec . Napo has not represented its members for a long time.
Deletehttps://www.keswickreminder.co.uk/2020/10/06/probe-after-bishop-of-carlisle-gives-child-abuse-vicar-reference/
ReplyDeleteThe Church of England has launched an investigation after it was revealed that the Bishop of Carlisle wrote a character reference for a vicar who last week was jailed for sexually abusing girls as young as nine.
The reference has been described as being "part of a pre sentence report package for the courts."
MIndful that the media don't always get court language right, perhaps NPS/HMPPS might also want to make enquiries as to if this was the case & how it was permitted?
Are you suggesting that if a service user hands over a reference to pass on to Court. The PSR author/NPS should decide whether it was appropriate for the referee to write it?
ReplyDeleteNo. Absolutely not. That's why I was careful to recognise that the media do not always use the right terminology.
DeleteIF a reference was submitted as "part of a pre sentence report package", that would surely be an issue for Probation? A "pre sentence report package" would surely mean a report written by a Probation employee which includes ancillary documents, e.g. psychiatric/psychological assessment? I do not see a third party reference as valid in that context.
If, however, A N Other has independently submitted a reference to the court for the benefit of the defendant, that is an entirely separate matter outwith the remit of the pre sentence report & not an issue for Probation.
Its such an unusual phrase for the media to use, so it it made my ears prick & raised the question - might a Probation employee have included a Bishop's reference as a document accompanying their pre sentence report?
Its not beyond possibility, however inappropriate it might be.
Do you see the difference between what I was asking & your interpretation, @09:54?
To clarify further, in case I missed something in your inference - if anyone gave me a reference for the court I would tell them to hand it to their solicitor to pass to the Court. My report-writing role is independent of defence or prosecution. It may have specialist reports and assessments attached, but certainly NOT a personal reference - whether from a Bishop, an ArchBishop, Royalty, Boris Chumsworth or Covid Trump.
DeleteI'm saying that if an offender offers a reference to a PSR author he or she should be politely advised that documents in support of a plea in mitigation are the business of the defence counsel and not the probation service. Simple.
Delete"Simple". Well, that puts me well & truly in my place. No similarity whatsoever between your "simple" view & anything I might have offered.
DeleteThat's cleared it up then. Thank you. I wish I found things so "simple".
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-politics-54387023
ReplyDelete