Friday 10 April 2020

Latest From Napo 207

There was a lot in yesterday's Napo C19 Bulletin 10 so I thought it a good idea to put it here:- 

Napo C19 Bulletin 10 – 09-04-2020

Advice on keeping safe in the workplace

Following extensive high level engagement between HMPPS, Napo and our sister unions, the NPS is producing new guidance on PPE and Hygiene for all NPS workplaces. We have seen early drafts of this and while there are some points still to work on we have asked that it is issued now to Divisions to give members a framework for taking the appropriate action if it is not immediately enacted. If necessary, it can be updated in future following feedback from members.

Napo have made the following basic demands.

For all workplaces Except APs:

  • Social distancing in the workplace between colleagues must be possible and hand hygiene products made available (soap, hot water, paper towels, hand sanitiser) – if not the workplace must not be used and should be closed
  • Arrangements for seeing clients in contact centres must include social distancing and hand hygiene as above – if this is not possible the contact centre must not be used for client visits (although if the workspace in the building meets the criteria above it can be used for non-contact work). Clients exhibiting any symptoms should not attend a contact centre.
  • There is new guidance for the use of hire and pool cars for doorstep visits and where this is not possible to follow these vehicles should not be used.
  • Similarly, there is guidance on the use of personal vehicles for doorstep visits and where this is not possible to follow these vehicles should not be used.
  • There is guidance for the doorstep visiting process and where this is not possible to follow the visit should not take place. Doorstep visits are to establish service user residence at an address and should not be used for ongoing supervision in place of telephone contact.
For Approved Premises:
  • There is specific guidance for APs as social distancing may not always be possible and PPE must be used in these circumstances.
  • The guidance provides helpful information about the type of PPE to be used in different circumstances and the training regime for its use which must be followed. Where appropriate PPE cannot be provided and where social distancing is not possible as an alternative our position is that the AP should be closed.
  • Concerns about APs that cannot be resolved locally should be shared with Siobhan Foreman sforeman@napo.org.uk
E3 Pay Protection Success

Trade Unions have been raising the issue of E3 pay protection for some time. Members affected will know that where staff were downgraded in the E3 job evaluation process there was a commitment from the employer to offer support and training to allow them to move to a role at the higher pay band. This has never materialised in any meaningful way, and some members will be approaching the end of their period of pay protection.

Following lengthy discussions, the employer has agreed with the Trade Unions position on this and will now issue guidance on an extension of E3 pay protection for those affected. We will of course share more advice and guidance on this once we have it, but this is a significant achievement for the unions and will benefit members who were, through no fault of their own, downgraded as a result of the E3 process.

NPS SPDR position confirmed

For the NPS there will shortly be guidance issued that will relieve the administrative burden on managers for processing SPDRs. This should not remove the usual discussions about practice and performance but the system will automatically default all SPDR scores to “Good” so managers will only need to complete paperwork where they believe a score of “outstanding” is warranted or, for those in formal poor performance processes only, where “needs improvement” is warranted. SPDR validation processes will be restricted to SPDRs where a score needs improvement or ‘outstanding’ has been given, and will be a much reduced process. We welcome this move to relieve the workloads of managers.

NPS – to restructure or not to restructure?

Last week we were assured by HMPPS Senior Leaders that, although the new Regional Directors were being welcomed into the NPS, the regional restructure was to be paused until the C-19 crisis has passed. Unfortunately this message did not land with some divisions, who have told staff already struggling to cope with unprecedented changes to their work that they will now have to adjust to being in a new region and having different management structures. In some areas this has more impact than others due to the geography and structural changes required. There are also challenges for Napo as some of the new structures don’t fit easily with our branch structure which is the frontline in terms of representation and support for members. We have made it clear that it is unacceptable to make structural changes at the moment when the relationships between frontline staff and their managers, and between Unions reps and managers, is so crucial. We continue to have discussions on this, and our position is that where such changes have been made we expect urgent action to reverse them and return stability and consistency for members and reps.

Special bonus scheme – as tricky as predicted

The Probation Trade Unions did not agree with much of the detail in the special bonus scheme or the rates of remuneration on offer so have not agreed to it. HMPPS nevertheless imposed on NPS staff a model that had been devised largely on the basis of prison and HQ grades rather than NPS grades. As predicted, the implementation has been confusing and divisive with members being told one day they were entitled to an allowance only to be told the opposite the next. After much discussion the employer produced some further guidance in the form of FAQs. Unfortunately these focussed almost solely on prison grades and terms and conditions and would be of little use to NPS staff. We have insisted that additional NPS specific guidance is produced as a matter of urgency so that we can offer advice and support to members facing confusion about their entitlements.

More HR confusion

Formal HR processes such as sickness reviews, disciplinary and grievance hearings should be suspended, apart from the most exceptional cases. This message was given to members last week and we were assured that NPS divisions were instructed to implement it. Many CRCs have also adopted this very sensible approach, only progressing those cases where there was an exceptional reason such as allowing someone to return to work or to retire on the grounds of ill health. As ever, the instruction was interpreted differently in different areas with some NPS Divisions denying all knowledge of it. We have now been assured that all Divisional Directors have been reminded of the instruction this week so if any reps or members are asked to participate in cases after today they should refer initially to the Divisional Director and escalate to us if sense does not prevail.

National Chair and GS to provide Oral Evidence to Justice Committee

Napo have been invited to provide evidence to a formal session of the Justice Select Committee (JSC) next Tuesday afternoon (see Twitter and the Napo Website for exact timings and viewing details).

The JSC are interested in understanding the range of challenges being faced by our members in the NPS and CRC’s during this unprecedented Coronavirus crisis. This is a valuable and very timely opportunity for Napo to report on the tremendous work being undertaken by our members to try and maintain vital services and protect our communities and service users from harm.

Obviously, the focus will be on the current emergency and we will gladly report on the positive progress with most Probation providers in working together to achieve the above objective. Nevertheless, we will be making it very clear as to why Napo remains opposed to the proposed contracting out of Intervention and Programme work next year. In addition, we will also want to make the JSC aware of the fact that the Government have so far failed to implement the agreement that was reached in 2018 on pay progression for NPS members.

Napo ‘meets’ with new Shadow Justice Minister

This week the new Labour Party Leader Sir Keir Starmer, appointed a new Shadow Cabinet. Their task will be to work with Government in the national interest during the current C19 crisis, but also to hold that Government to account on a number of fronts.

Today National Chair Katie Lomas and General Secretary Ian Lawrence were invited to take part in a Skype call with the Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy MP. Many members may recall David holding this position in a previous Labour Government and being highly critical of the lack of support for Probation staff from their senior leaders at the time.

We provided a comprehensive summary of the difficulties that our members are coping with right now, as well as explaining our campaigning objectives on Probation reform, pay and workloads and rebuilding the probation service following the disasters resulting from Transforming Rehabilitation.

David and Keir Starmer, have both been invited to attend the 2020 Napo AGM and whilst we await confirmation of their availability, David will monitor the outcomes from Tuesdays JSC hearing and intends to produce a personal Video message for Napo members in the near future.

Radio 5 ‘shoutout’

Every day this week Radio 5 Live is doing a shout out to key workers during the pandemic. Yesterday they chose to give a shout out to Probation and Prison staff. A number of probation staff got involved with phone ins and text messages being read out. Napo General Secretary Ian Lawrence was interviewed and highlighted just how hard Napo members are working in these difficult times. It was a real morale boost for staff, many of whom have felt a bit forgotten in this crisis despite going above and beyond the normal call of duty and coping with home working for the first time. A big thank you to all that got involved!

Further talks, If you or any member of staff you know is isolating in an abusive relationship please seek help immediately. You can call the national help line on 0808 2000 247 for advice. If you are in danger and cannot speak you can call 999 then press 55. This will alert the police and they will come to your home. Alternatively you could contact Napo via tbassett@napo.org.uk.

Finally, have a restful Easter

Just a few weeks ago, nobody would have envisaged that we would all spend one of the most important national holidays across the UK, confined to our homes save only for limited outdoor visits for essential shopping and exercise.

We can only hope that all of our members take this opportunity to get some much needed rest and relaxation over this weekend. Wherever you work across the 23 employers where Napo is recognised as the authoritative voice for its members, you can be proud of the contribution you have made during the national emergency. It speaks volumes for the values you believe in and our collective commitment to create a better and safer society.

Napo Head Office

76 comments:

  1. From Centre For Crime and Justice Studies:-

    Following lockdowns and social distancing, some encouraging signs of the beginnings of a slowdown in the spread of COVID-19.

    In prisons, however, all the signs are that, far from being slowed, the onward march of coronavirus is accelerating. The number of prisoners who have tested positive for COVID-19 in England and Wales has doubled in a week. At least ten prisoners have died since the outbreak began. There will surely be more.

    Earlier this week the Justice Secretary, Robert Buckland, told the House of Commons Justice Committee about the government's plans for the early release of up to 4,000 prisoners, to help reduce the risk of COVID-19 spreading through the prison system.

    Yet when pressed on how many prisoners had been released as part of an earlier initiative in relation to pregnant women, the Justice Secretary confirmed the number at a mere six.

    This embarrassingly small number is only one sign of a lack of seriousness on the part of the Ministry of Justice in the face of a clear and present danger of widespread coronavirus infection in prison.

    A few weeks ago the Justice Secretary told the same Committee that there were around 1,800 prisoners who, were they living in the community, would be subject to shielding arrangements because of their potential vulnerability to COVID-19 infection.

    Given this, it would make sense for any early release programme specifically to target this group. As my colleague Roger Grimshaw points out, finding safe and suitable provision for this particularly vulnerable group should be a top priority.

    Yet eligibility for the early release programme is based on prisoners being close to the end of their sentence. Any release of vulnerable prisoners under this scheme would be coincidental, not intentional.

    According to the Prison Governors Association, the proposed early release of 4,000 prisoners, in any case, falls far short of the numbers required. According to the Assocation, Public Health England and the Prison Service have proposed 'a reduction of 15,000 prisoners in order to truly safeguard prisoners and staff'. Criticising the 'woefully short' target of 4,000 released prisoners, the Association pointed out that, 'This is about saving the lives of staff and prisoners and brave decisions must be made to achieve this'.

    The government has taken the difficult decision to put millions of people across the UK under a relatively benign, but real, form of house arrest. An ongoing unwillingness to take the, comparatively much easier, decision to release ten to fifteen thousand prisoners to protect lives could come back to haunt the government if COVID-19 entrenches itself in the prison system.

    Early release from prison is only one of a number of tactics governments can use to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in prison. In this piece, my colleague Matt Ford offers an update on our work collating what is happening across Europe in the fight against coronavirus in prisons.

    We're aiming to share the emerging findings later this month.

    Richard Garside

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm starting to think that the Government has no intention of releasing 4000 prisoners.
      I think they've just plucked a number out because they have to be seen to be taking action, but quietly keeping their fingers crossed that prisons won't be affected as much as predicted, and if it is as bad as predicted then any political fallout that may come from their lack of action to release prisoners will be buried by what's going on in the general population post pandemic.
      I really see no other explanation for their complete lack of action so far.
      I hope it does come back to haunt them.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. Danny Shaw BBC website:-

      Prison update: a week ago 73 prisoners in England/Wales had tested positive for Covid-19. Now, the number is more than double that - 149, across 47 prisons. In addition, 28 prison staff & 5 prisoner escort workers have the virus.

      Delete
    3. The spread to staff is concerning. I’d be interested to know how many probation workers in the community have tested positive.

      Delete
    4. If the virus does grip prisons like it's been predicted, then we are quickly reaching the point where early release becomes an impotent strategy to control the virus.
      It also means that many prisoners will reach their end of sentence date and have to be released irrespective of whether they carry the infection or not. Some of them undoubtly will be released homeless, or back to families, possibly with young children.
      The Government seem to be forgetting that the prisoners they've identified for possible early release will be released anyway in a month or twos time.
      The Governments lack of action to release prisoners early only means that more and more infected prisoners are being released to carry the virus back into society.
      Taking swift action to tackle the virus in prisons isn't just about showing concern for those incarcerated, it's also about controlling the spread of the virus from prisons to the gereral public.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    5. Getafix are you a bit stupid sometimes? If you want a decesion to haunt the government it means the prisoners will become victims of covid 19 on mass or otherwise . Infection q is too many please consider your comment.

      Delete
    6. If the virus does grip prisons like it's been predicted, then the government stratagy of releasing prisoners early to combat Covid19 in prisons will very soon become impotent.
      Many of those identified for possible early release are approaching their release date anyway.
      That means that many of those that could be released early will be released automatically whether they carry the virus or not. The longer they're exposed to the conditions that exist in prisons now, the greater the possibility of becoming infected.
      Undoubtly some will be released homeless, others back to families with elderly individuals or young children.
      The Government seem to be forgetting, or ignoring the fact that the need to take action to control Covid19 in prisons is not just about concern for the wellbeing and safety for those incarcerated, its also about controlling the spread of the virus FROM prisons to the rest of society.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    7. The problem though is Probation staff will not be tested unless admitted to hospital so unless an antibody test is developed and then we are included in the testing, we will never have anything near an accurate picture. I know this is the same for everyone and am not suggesting we should have any greater priority but, as someone who has almost certainly had C-19, I would like to know for sure.

      Delete
    8. I completely agree with Getafix and 1046 unfortunately yes so many people will be released that are more than likely to be infected note at this stage and no they will most definitely not be tested , even if they are what's to be done once they've got to their automatic release date - my daughter is a staff nurse at an ED and advised me this morning on return from a night shift that things have changed again and they're not all being tested only the staff that are currently off self isolating so they can get staff back in work if appropriate

      Delete
  2. As a vlo E3 downgraded most from 4 to 3. Napo agreed this nationally. A pay reduction. Boasting the best that can be achieved and demotivating grade 3 staff. Protections for grade 4 doing the same role for 3byeats expire soon and no one wants anyone to lose pay. Those stuck at pay band 3 are now officially paid less for the same role. What's Napo done for this group . Why have you not argued pay equity what is that Napo don't understand about the meaning of a collective. There is no fairness to least paid and this union just support the NPS unjust corrupted attitudes. Napo rubbish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The VLO role was never a band 4 role. It was only paid at band 4 where qualified probation officer were seconded or transferred into the VLO role and retained their band 4 pay. This led to divisions / trusts paying the role at band 4 where qualified probation officers were VLOs. Then PSO VLOs (non-qualified and paid at band 3) demanded to be paid at band 4 too (which was a fair demand and was granted in some divisions / trusts for a period). The VLO role was then assessed and graded at band 3 for all.

      The admin manager / business manager role had a similar journey when the demanded and achieved band 5 for a short period, but were then regraded to band 4 (which is still to high in my view for forwarding emails and ordering toilet roles.

      However, while we scrum about who earns what, if probation officers were increased to band 5 (where they should be) then everyone else would more easily argued to move up a band too.

      If you really want something to moan about, consider how much the finance and IT managers attached to probation earn. Consider the overtime payments submitted by ACO and Directors. It is shocking.

      Delete
    2. Factually on bands for vlos they were officially and properly regraded using he schemes in many trusts . They are entitled to band 4 pay for a role which has drift and many tasks and high cover serious risk issues understanding special emotional needs and support to victims. Your personal anecdotal attacks reflect what you are. We are all underpaid.

      Delete
    3. This is incorrect. There was variation and most trusts paid the VLO role at band 3 unless the employee was a qualified probation officer and had transferred into the role.

      Delete
    4. Annoy 09.09

      Your opinion about BM roles and pay far off the mark. Main Probation grades are not the only professionals in the organisation. Addressing glass ceiling faced by non main grades staff working in Probation and budgets restriction during the Trust days led to roles previously being carried out by SPOs and POs reassigned to non probation grades staff.

      No one should be disadvantaged because of their job title. Your thinking was rife during the Trust days.

      We are Civil Servants with expectations to treat colleagues with respect and dignity. Also to behave in accordance with Civil Service Codes.

      Delete
  3. Most VLO's are Band 3 and always were.The job does not merit Band 4 and never did, it's basically hand holding

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh is that right to you. Clearly you know nothing of the workload duties responsibilities advise care mappa input assesment and it goes on. Role for role it's now 2 tier pay and po equivalents a largely admin role itself the same can be said ? Pay up pay fair are just phrases that mean nothing.

      Delete
    2. 8:05 - don't take the troll-bait.

      "it's basically hand holding" shows 7:33 has absolutely no idea what s/he is talking about.

      vlo role should never have been a probation role, and should never have been a non-qualified role. It is difficult & challenging work, often with very distressed/traumatised/angry people. Band 4 is exactly where it should lie. Probation, HMPPS, NAPO, MoJ - none of them give vlo work the respect it deserves.

      Delete
    3. If this makes a vlo role band four then admins should be band four too for dealing with challenging probation officers on a daily basis.

      Delete
    4. A vlo does less than a om pso, so why should they earn more ?

      Delete
    5. a vlo does a different job to an om pso

      Delete
    6. Yes and much less in terms of role, responsibility, long term planning and management of risk. A VLO is more on par with a Case Administrator.

      Delete
    7. In my opinion many admin staff do the work of Band 5/6; they are certainly several magnitudes brighter than most band 5/6's I know and definitely carry those they work with.
      Break out the Babycham!

      Delete
    8. Victim support roles outside of probation pay far less than band 3.

      Delete
  4. My experience of working in a prison is that of a lack of social distancing due to the environment. Too many staff that are non essential are still in the prison despite not being able to carry out normal activities. This in my opinion is increasing the risk to all. We now appear to be desk sharing more than before. No hand sanitiser in the prison only on the way out! If we have the technology and the IT support prison probation could have positive influence without the health risks. In terms of support for those being released NFA it would be great to hear if they are being accommodated once on release? And if so which areas? As this is not my experience with my recent releases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VLO facilitate Parole contributions known as VPS, we attend mappa to provide risk management information, child protection meetings in domestic violence cases, provide licence conditions and exclusions, as well as case management of an average 350 cases. The job is the same for each VLO regardless of their pay. It can never be acceptable for staff providing exactly the same service to be paid more than their colleagues. What is worse is that my Union have authorised this. Only NAPO could be so misguided and damaging causing division and resentment in a small staff group who by nature are not militant. This latest NAPO/employer collusion is disgusting. All NAPO members should be worried by this action, it will be you next.

      Delete
    2. Still less work and responsibility than an OM PSO. A VLO should not be Band 4 and on par with a qualified Probation Officer.

      Delete
    3. a vlo should be a qualified officer/social worker and should be Band 4

      Delete
    4. 8.41 for all your qualification
      ndsnd your perceived intellect you have failed to grasp that NAPO have agreed to pay grade 4 to some VLOs but not others. You are consumed with self importance yet transparent insecurities the damaging message is lost on you.

      Delete
    5. This was for those qualified as probation officers who moved into the role. If you want band 4 the do the training as the rest of us have too.

      Delete
    6. Training as a po offender focused work is not the same as vlo victim facing. Po qualifications cqsw pquip or the criminal justice certificate are low level low intellect qualifications. They don't hurt but a body of experience reasoned maturity are worth more and the job genuinely has the levels required to qualify band four pay. The problem is Napo are happy to see members infighting than confront properly the pay inequalities. Or your troll commentary inflames the underpaid overworked and injustices. You must be Napo or management .

      Delete
    7. A PO undertakes a university degree based professional qualification. A VLO does not. To not understand this would be like a masseuse demanding to be paid the same as a surgeon because both their roles focus on Heath and wellbeing.

      Delete
  5. Tangent - Compare & contrast - Integrity or Bullshit
    The Two-Tier Society

    Calderwood, Scottish Chief Medical Officer, public face & voice of 'stay at home' message - makes two non-essential journeys, is caught out, offers resignation

    English Cabinet Minister Jenrick, public face & voice of 'stay at home' message - makes two non-essential journeys, one of which is significantly long, is caught out & vigorously defends it, much like Stephen Pillock last week.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/cabinet-minister-robert-jenrick-visited-his-parents-during-covid-19-lockdown

    arrogant scumball

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The cabinet minister Robert Jenrick is facing questions after travelling to visit his parents at the weekend, despite repeatedly urging the public to stay at home during the lockdown to curb the spread of coronavirus.

      The Guardian has established that the housing, communities and local government secretary – who has made media appearances urging people to save lives by remaining in their properties even if tempted to see loved ones – went to see his parents at their Shropshire home, 40 miles by road from his own.

      A witness has told the Guardian they saw Jenrick, 38, visiting the property at the weekend.

      A source close to the cabinet minister admitted that he had made the journey during lockdown conditions, but defended the trip by saying he dropped off food and medication, and did not enter the house. Jenrick later confirmed this in a tweet in which he said his parents were both self-isolating, because of age and his father’s medical condition, and he had respected social distancing rules.

      Government instructions say: “You should not be visiting family members who do not live in your home.” The only exception is if they need help, such as having shopping or medication dropped off.

      The Guardian understands that the local community has been supporting Jenrick’s parents by delivering groceries in recent weeks. This was not denied, though the source said Jenrick had collected and delivered medication for his parents, too.

      On Thursday night it emerged that the minister had also travelled between London and his home in Herefordshire, which is not in his constituency of Newark in Nottinghamshire.

      Delete
    2. Even the Daily Fail isn't impressed:

      Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick ignored his own lockdown advice to take 'medicine to his elderly parents' home... but locals say THEY had already been delivering essentials to them

      Robert Jenrick repeatedly appealed to members of the public to avoid unnecessary travel during lockdown
      But he left London on March 29 to head to his mansion in Herefordshire where his wife and three children live
      He then drove 40 miles to travel to his mother and father at their home in Shropshire on April 4 or April 5
      Mr Jenrick said he was bringing his mother and father food and medication and did not enter their property
      But one No 10 source called his behaviour 'idiotic' when he has been urging millions not to leave the house

      Today it emerged he stayed in his £2.5million London home for the first six days of the lockdown until March 29, after he represented the Government at the daily Downing Street coronavirus press conference where Britons were again urged not to leave the house.

      But hours later he then travelled 150 miles to his country house in Herefordshire...

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8206255/Cabinet-minister-Robert-Jenrick-seen-visiting-parents-lockdown.html

      Delete
    3. He is discredited and now a possible liar why deliver medicine we all know it is a free NHS service to deliver prescription drugs. Also what shipping and where did he queue up for it exactly . Transporting food 40 plus miles is not essential if it should have obtained locally. This millionaire is playing with peopelsoves and if Boris were able would have to sack him. Indeed I hope Boris has had his epipheny moment in ICU and will now be a better more social orientated protected of doing right and putting Pepe before profits. Sack him clear up the cabinet elitism.

      Delete
  6. “ Formal HR processes such as sickness reviews, disciplinary and grievance hearings should be suspended, apart from the most exceptional cases.”

    What about SFO investigations?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Said already another Napo contradiction. What about appeals how can this be appropriate or fair during these time Napo need educating.

      Delete
  7. There is no probation office where social distancing is possible at all times for staff and offenders alike. That is unless there is only 1 person in the building. Social distancing is not just about keeping a 2 metre+ distance from offenders, the distance must be kept from fellow staff too. Also washing hands and use of hand sanitizer (which everyone else has touched) is not enough, and leaving aside that overuse of hand sanitizer can cause skin problems. PPE such as gloves, masks and daily on-site deep cleaning professionals is required. Napo’s ‘basic’ requests are not good enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't be too harsh - its not easy to evaluate the working conditions of a probation office from your London sitting room. Maybe Napo should employ Robert Jenrick to travel the UK & check things out.

      Delete
    2. Alternatively Napo could just send everyone a “lovely letter”. Seems to have worked a treat for Divisional Directors.

      Delete
    3. Could someone please post this 'lovely' email!

      Delete
  8. MPs are being offered £10,000 to work from home.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now the real inherent inequities of the greedy classes start to unravel:


      MPs are to be allowed to claim an extra £10,000 in expenses to help them work from home during the coronavirus epidemic.

      According to The Times, the cash can be spent on laptops and printers for MPs and their staff, or to pay for additional electricity, heating and phone bills.

      It comes on top of the existing £26,000 a year that MPs can each claim to cover their office costs.

      New guidance published last month by the Indpendent Parliamentary Standards Authority, which polices the MPs' expenses regime, said: "This is an uncertain and challenging time. Ipsa is committed to supporting MPs and their staff to carry on with their work as far as possible."

      And a letter to MPs from Richard Lloyd, the interim chair of Ipsa, said: "We have agreed a series of immediate measures that we hope will provide you with the resources and flexibility to concentrate on your parliamentary duties and support your staff."

      https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/mps-given-10000-extra-to-help-them-work-from-home-during-coronavirus-outbreak

      Delete
    2. Probation Heads of Service are being granted £1500 while they work from home, alongside overtime and on-call payments for all their “leadership”,

      Delete
    3. 9.19. Stop crying. Simple solution is to become top table yourself. I don't begrudge them. They should take what they want and you shouldn't criticise a role no one on here knows nothing about including the stress bankers get more

      Delete
    4. Haha your brilliant and must be Napo for such divided views and outward projection . Are you the next or current general secretary.

      Delete
  9. Bottom line. VLOs like PSOs are not qualified meaning anyone can do it. Pay should follow qualifications and top table. Next napo be wanting administrators on band 4. Not happy. This making my blood boil. Band 4 for hand holding. POs are the business

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’d more agree with a Case Administrator moving up a band over a VLO. Victim support is a voluntary role in many places nowadays.

      Delete
    2. I agree as CAs do more too

      Delete
    3. Levels of responsibility are defined in the proper job evaluation procedures. Sadly not taken seriously by your ilk.

      Delete
  10. The basic annual salary for an MP from 1 April 2019 is £79,468. MPs also receive expenses to cover the costs of running an office, employing staff, having somewhere to live in London or their constituency, and travelling between Parliament and their constituency.

    House of Commons stationery and postage paid envelope costs

    The House of Commons provides a cash limited sum per year for the provision of postage paid envelopes and House of Commons stationery to all Members; this sum is in addition to any costs that may be reimbursed under the IPSA expenses scheme.

    Personal Additional Accommodation Expenditure (PAAE)Purpose of the allowancePAAE is available to reimburse Members for the additional expenses necessarily incurred in staying overnight away from their main home for the purpose of performing their parliamentary duties. It may only be used to meet the following costs:
    Rent (including ground rent)
    Mortgage interest
    Council tax
    Hotel accommodation
    Utility bills (gas, water, electricity, oil, telephone calls and line rental)
    Service charges
    Insurance (buildings and contents)
    Overnight Subsistence

    PAAE can be claimed if the principles set out in Part I have been complied with, and
    If your main home is in the constituency, for overnight stays in London
    If your main home is in London, for overnight stays in the constituency
    If your main home is neither in London nor the constituency, you can choose in respect of which of these areas to claim PAAE
    For these purposes, “constituency” is regarded as any point within 20 miles of the constituency boundary.


    Here's a KEY phrase from The Green Book:

    Property used as an officeThe Department must be informed if PAAE is being claimed on a property and you wish to claim against AOE for any of the costs associated with an office on those premises (for example, heating, lighting, decoration, furniture). You must ensure that you do not claim twice for any element of these costs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So what
      They're allowed it's in the rules. Unhappy then get a higher paid job. Sorry but its true

      Delete
    2. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-finance-office/greenbook.pdf

      The little hard-up darlin's already get shitloads of cash for working away from HoC:

      Administrative and Office Expenditure (AOE)
      Purpose of the allowance
      The AOE is an allowance designed to provide for facilities, equipment, supplies and services for Members and their staff. It may only be used to meet the following costs:
      Accommodation for office or surgery use or for occasional meetings
      Equipment and supplies for the office or surgery
      Work commissioned and other services
      Certain travel costs not met out of travel expenditure

      Eligibility - All Members can claim for this allowance when their claim complies with the principles set out in Part I.

      Accommodation

      Office rent
      Hiring facilities for surgeries or meetings
      Payments to utilities: rates, water, gas, electricity
      Repairs and alterations if required when first occupying a property or by your lease, provided that these do not go beyond making good dilapidations and thus enhance the value of the property
      Measures to ensure office security, better health and safety or accessibility for the disabled

      Additional costs of using part of your home as an office – provided this is set aside as an office. If you claim PAAE for this home you must take particular care to ensure that you do not claim twice for the same expenses

      Insurance for office premises
      Equipment and supplies
      Purchase or lease of photocopiers, faxes, scanners, phones and other office equipment, including computers and printers
      Purchase of office furniture
      Purchase of stationery and office consumables
      Purchase of hardware and software
      Insurance for office contents other than centrally provided computers and legal costs insurance
      Telephone costs

      Delete
    3. So yes, its in the rules & they're allowed.

      Not sure why another £10K each is required then.

      Delete
  11. Comments be off soon as the snowflakes being blown away today. You stand up for management or napo and comment moderation gets turned on by dictator jim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good morning Ian.

      Delete
    2. Hahaha. You're right though do not refer to people as snowflakes. They're people

      Delete
  12. The lockdown is clearly getting to everyone this morning :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly yes. While this pissing-about is going on, at 09:19 'Getafix talks common sense as usual:-

      I'm starting to think that the Government has no intention of releasing 4000 prisoners. I think they've just plucked a number out because they have to be seen to be taking action, but quietly keeping their fingers crossed that prisons won't be affected as much as predicted, and if it is as bad as predicted then any political fallout that may come from their lack of action to release prisoners will be buried by what's going on in the general population post pandemic. I really see no other explanation for their complete lack of action so far. I hope it does come back to haunt them.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. Good point but some are being let out jim. surely you accept that this pandemic is unique and you cannot let out any Tom dick and harry out without the proper checks . What's more important. Public health in prisons or keeping communities and people safe

      Delete
  13. What a sad refection this blog sometimes presents and especially at a time like this. Comment moderation in place until later.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is it me or do other CRC staff think that NAPO has all but abandoned us. I work in a prison (yes, the hated TTG initiative) - no mention of PPE, bonuses or even a pay increase (have nt had one for years). I am now told that the early release scheme will see TTG staff 'supervising' those service users until their CRD when they will then be handed over to the community. This is provoking some concern amongst TTG staff - are we going to to be the RO during their ROTL period? This instruction applies to all releases under this scheme. Currently the numbers are low but as the death toll rises in prisons amongst staff and prisoners, the parameters will change and more will come into the scheme. HMPPS prison and probation colleagues seem to be valued and supported. It just feels like we are cannon fodder. CRC colleagues in the community offices are reporting increasing use of doorstep interviews with no PPE. Interestingly I did raise the issue of of our 'owners' RRP getting more involved in supporting us, a bonus might be appreciated at the very least, only to be told, not a chance - RRPs parent company APM are losing money so no wage increase and may even be redundancies at the end of all of this. Great motivator !!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wonder if the media will roast Jenrick over his non-compliant, hypocritical behaviour as severely as they did Calderwood? She was flame-grilled live on TV.

    Or will the posh little rich boy be excused? He certainly won't be paraded before the media for scrutiny as Calderwood was. he hasn't offered to resign as Calderwood did. And no-one's baying for his blood - even the BBC seem to be accepting his feeble explanation without question.

    Maybe his Newark constituency office could take a stand kick him out? He was parachuted in to the not-so-wealthy area from his Herefordshire mansion, so he's not exactly a revered local.

    Lets see if this coronavirus effect really does have a levelling impact; or whether its just for women; or even more specifically women in Scotland.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-housing-secretary-robert-jenrick-defends-visiting-elderly-parents-during-lockdown-11971420

      Downing Street has backed a minister who travelled 150 miles from London to a property he owns in rural Herefordshire during the coronavirus lockdown.

      Days after chairing a government news conference in Westminster to reinforce the "stay at home" message, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick appeared on Sky News via video link from the seventeenth century manor house he owns in the hamlet of Eye.

      This is despite the Nottinghamshire MP's website stating his family live 120 miles away in his constituency of Newark as well as in London.
      _____________

      So the pompous arrogant liar gets away with it.

      Huzzah for Boris's Boys!!!

      Delete
    2. Is he a posh boy?

      Jenrick owns two, £2m homes in London, one of which is a £2.5m townhouse less than a mile from the Houses of Parliament and also purchased Eye Manor, a Grade I listed building in Herefordshire for £1.1 million in 2009.

      MP's Newark Constituency is 150 miles from 'Family Home' in Herefordshire. He rents a £2,000-a-month property in his Newark constituency - which he bills to the taxpayer.

      He will, of course be struggling to cope because Eye Manor is NOT designated a place of work, so he is eligible for the additonal £10,000 pocket money to enable him to work from home. Thank goodness for that!!

      In January 2020, Jenrick spoke at the Conservative Friends of Israel parliamentary reception and told the audience that he would "look forward to the day" when Britain's embassy in Israel will be "moved to Jerusalem".

      Delete
    3. Shame he didn't say as minister for housing I have many homes and this is because we have a policy to ensure at least everyone has one home at least . Tory scum.

      Delete
    4. https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/i-look-forward-to-britain-s-embassy-moving-to-jerusalem-says-minister-robert-jenrick-1.496145

      Jenrick's strong political & personal links with right-wing Israelis might explain the full-on protection being afforded to him over this embarrassing, sackable gaffe.

      "The UK is currently bound by an EU common foreign policy position not to follow the United States in moving its Embassy to Jerusalem. As things stand, that prohibition will fall on 1 November. FCO officials had previously been asked to produce a contingency plan, but this involved the construction of a £14 million new Embassy and a four year timescale. They have now been asked to go back and look at a quick fix involving moving the Ambassador and immediate staff to Jerusalem and renaming the Consulate already there as the Embassy. This could be speedily announced, and then implemented in about a year.

      Johnson heads the most radically pro-Israel cabinet in UK history and the symbolic gesture of rejection of Palestinian rights is naturally appealing to his major ministers Patel, Javid and Raab. They also see three other political benefits. Firstly, they anticipate that Labour opposition to the move can be used to yet again raise accusations of “anti-semitism” against Jeremy Corbyn. Secondly, it provides good “red meat” to Brexiteer support in marking a clear and, they believe, popular break from EU foreign policy, at no economic cost. Thirdly, it seals the special link between the Trump and Johnson administrations and sets the UK apart from other NATO allies."

      "The Jewish Chronicle reports that Mr Jenrick also took aim at Jeremy Corbyn and the anti-Semitism of the Labour party.

      Mr Jenrick said that “defeating Jeremy Corbyn” at last month’s election was “not the celing – that’s the floor.”

      He told those gathered, “It is not just Jeremy Corbyn who is antisemitic – many of those people continue.”

      Mr Jenrick singled out Labour leadership contender Sir Keir Starmer, accusing him of hypocrisy for now attempting to distance himself from the Labour leader despite having been “perfectly willing to take a ministerial car and serve in the cabinet of Jeremy Corbyn.”

      He added: “We will not forget the conduct of those people who now aspire to lead the Labour Party – and the Jewish community won’t either.”
      _______________________

      This is serious. It suggests that the UK Tory government is explicitly aligning itself with Trump & the more extreme right in Israel, while looking to weaponise anti-Semitism as a means of shutting down any dissenting voice within the House of Commons.

      Delete
  16. I think today's blog demonstrates that it's going to take a whole lot more then the Governments decision to renationalise probation to bring it all back together again.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just wanted to make an observation for the record that, while so many at taking the hit, there are still plenty of dickheads out & about this Good Friday.

    Lucky to live in a small village surrounded by working farms. Already our street has been as busy as on any non-lockdown warm spring day - cars packed with bodies, motorhomes pootling by, several groups of cyclists (up to a dozen at a time) - and folks with napsacs gently wandering by, smiling & waving to us through the window.

    Out of sheer exasperation I have just told the last group of three to "fuck off home". Their reply? "There's no need for that. We're just out for a nice Good Friday walk. We're not bothering anyone."

    !!WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE??

    Its a complex virus, not a complex message.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here coastal town cul-de-sac cars and more cars up and down don't stop wandering through walkers going no place car sunroofs open windows and music. Children on the seats and does not look like any deliveries or visiting to car going on so what is going on with these people ?

      Delete
    2. Meanwhile in Rotherham police are trying to stop families using their own front gardens

      https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/police-officer-dad-cant-play-kids-front-garden-lockdown-south-yorkshire-a4412061.html

      Delete
    3. Hey folks, want to avoid detection in a time of coronavirus?

      Send your luggage via courier in advance, then sneak through the back roads at night. You'll manage to get to your 2nd home, 3rd home or airb'n'b before dawn without being sent home.

      Tip: don't carry a canoe on your roofrack.

      Delete
  18. Well that was a jolly experience. Well done chaps!!

    Not a single question about Jenrick.

    NOT. A. SINGLE. QUESTION.

    UK media should be so ashamed of itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Telegraph raises an interesting point (well, it seems to until the paywall shuts it down)

      "When Dominic Raab faced questions this week about his authority to order a “change of direction” in Government, he was able to hide behind the fact that the issue was, at that point, largely hypothetical.

      Not any more. Robert Jenrick’s decision to drive 150 miles to his second home during the lockdown - and make an 80-mile round trip to his parents’ home - means someone must decide whether he should be fired as Housing Secretary.

      Only on Sunday, Scotland’s chief medical officer resigned over an almost identical lapse of judgement after it became clear her position was untenable.

      Yet acting prime minister Mr Raab cannot sack the Housing Secretary: he lacks the formal powers vested in the Prime Minister, such as the ability to appoint and sack ministers..."


      The Mirror says:

      "No10 today said travelling hundreds of miles from work in London to return to the family home - even if one has a home in London too - is "essential travel".

      The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "I think the Secretary of State has set out in two different statements the reasons for the journeys which he made.

      "We are confident he complied with the social distancing rules."

      Asked to confirm No10 did not believe Mr Jenrick did anything wrong, the spokesman replied: "Correct.

      "As I say, he set out the reasons for the journeys which he made and we are confident he complied with the rules."
      __________

      Note: the words of "the Prime Minister's official spokesman", NOT Raab.

      So how was Raab or the Cabinet protected from having to answer questions about Jenrick? And why is Jenrick being so carefully protected?

      1. Raab wasn't there.

      2. The staged media hour requires questions to be submitted in advance, which are then chosen by No.10

      3. The videolink allows the chairing minister to cut off whoever he/she chooses.

      4. Presumably Jenrick is part of the chumocracy.
      _____________________

      Also, did anyone else note the familiar tone creeping in to today's briefing as Hancock began introducing the notion of blaming NHS staff for being profligate with their PPE, for not following "new government guidance"?

      Remember the NPS guidance which hung probation staff out to dry by saying breaches of social distancing were individual officers' responsibilities.

      The Govt's PPE supply chain isn't working - its never been there in sufficient quantity - but now they're looking to blame NHS staff. Apportioning blame to anyone else they can, especially to easy targets, is a red flag Tory trait when things are getting tight.

      And who noticed Hancock *totally ignore* the question about palliative care patients being denied oxygen in order to keep the supply 'live' for covid-19 patients?

      They're looking ropier than ropey...

      Delete
  19. 100,000 reported coronavirus deaths achieved worldwide from a reported base of 1.66m cases

    6% global mortality rate

    Germany 2%

    South Korea 2%

    UK 12%


    Jenrick won't have helped.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Can CRCs or are CRCs taking advantage of the business rates relief being extended to businesses at the moment?

    ReplyDelete