Sunday, 3 March 2019

Transforming Rehabilitation: The Movie



“The Ministry set itself up to fail in how it approached probation reforms. Its rushed roll-out created significant risks that it was unable to manage."

So, Probation unions, grounds for those who lost their careers to claim against HMG for gross negligence, loss of earnings, constructive dismissal? THEY, the MoJ, imposed premeditated job losses when negotiating & issuing contracts to the new providers. They cannot pass the buck. Job losses were integral to this flawed project & Grayling's provision of £80m from the Modernisation Fund to pay redundancies is evidence of that. Make them pay the price - we had to.

*****
It was never about innovation or reducing reoffending. It was about handing money to the private sector, cutting wage/pension bill, palming off responsibility for any problems from the government to others.

******
The 'new model' being rolled out in Interserve CRCs such as Cheshire and Greater Manchester is a 'new model' in name only. No money is being spent on it - quite the contrary in fact. In a clumsy attempt to reduce expenditure still further the 'new model' consists of nothing more than some meaningless new team names within which the only change is yet higher caseloads for PSOs and the few remaining POs while Interserve sells off the services of experienced PO staff to the NPS. This was initially attributed to a bogus claim that they had suddenly realised their CRCs had too many POs for the nature of the caseload cohort, before the justification was quickly abandoned because it was transparently untrue, and they admitted it was entirely a matter of wanting to spend less. For the sake of the staff, the client group and above all for the sake of public safety their collapse is the best thing that can possibly happen.

*****
For me the real elephant in the TR room is Interserve. In two weeks time they will ask their shareholders to vote through a rescue deal which will wipe out 95% of their holdings. All shareholders that is except its board members. Orwellian turkeys voting for Christmas. If the deal isn't passed, Interserves piggy bank is empty, and it's government bailout or fold. If a second TR contractor should go into administration then TR2 must be dead in the water. In summary to my meanderings? Well it's all just the most awful f****ng mess.

*****
On behalf of all the under 12mth group that's not mentioned I'd like to extend a big thank you to Grayling for the wonderful support his probation privatisation has brought everyone. Through the gate? Most under 12mths are now through the gate many times a year on recall or breach of licence. But I guess that represents the support with accommodation that you promised.

It's unfortunate that the third sector have failed to play fair and provide substance misuse and addiction services for free. It wouldn't be fair on the private sector to expect shareholders or CEOs to contribute to those services and damage their bonuses.
And the mentors are great, and I just can't understand why there isn't more of them. It's an opportunity to do something for free whilst helping big corporations earn lots of money.
And on the subject of money you deserve a special thankyou as everyone still gets £46 to put in their pocket! Thankyou Mr Grayling.

*****
I would also like to point out the immense amount of talent and experience lost to the Probation Service as a result of TR. Talent and experience that was matured by years, often decades, of personal dedication and by the profession, a public sector profession. Talent and experience sold for tuppence to the lowest bidder in order that they could contrive a profit at all our expense. I think a lot of these companies were, still are, chancers and opportunists with limited credentials.

*****
Two deaths on my caseload this year a drug overdose in a notorious den and a suicide, 46 and 28yr old. I'm in CRC and the system is broken, minimal rehabilitation it's all about enforcement. Staff sit behind computers clicking away and management send spreadsheet after spreadsheet. We need to reform with the NPS to save lives of service users, victims, families and staff.

*****
I have recently started training as a probation officer and I am considering leaving already. I can see the POs are hard-working and trying their best but the morale and office environment is shocking. They are all looking for new jobs and look exhausted. I wanted to have some security in this training and learn from POs around me but they have nothing more go give, they are burnt out. Most of them have been in the job 20 years and they say the job is beyond recognisable, they used to enjoy it but the changes have made the job and case loads unmanageable. I had a job interview today and I hope I get it so I can leave. I value my own mental health and there are red flags everywhere for a team that is like a sinking ship.

******
So many years have seen a few hardcore anonymous voices fighting to keep the issues surrounding Grayling's murder of the Probation profession alive, with Jim's commentaries & his all-inclusive blog the locus of those who regularly post. Bizarrely, a blog overtly ignored by at least one trades union. Perhaps the criticisms on the blog were a bit too close to the truth...It's intriguing to see who is now venturing out of the woodwork to condemn Grayling & TR.

Posters to this blog have generated many links & exposed practices or policies that have no place in a Probation setting, whether CRC or NPS. Sadly it will probably be a case of "told you so", rather than seeing Grayling swing from any metaphorical lamp-post. The machinations of TR2 are progressing apace behind closed doors & it would be hard to see Gauke & co pulling back from expediting (what I guess are) deals that are more-or-less done, e.g. Seetec get the Wonky Links contracts. Well done Jim & the contributors to this blog. Keep it up!! It aint over.

18 comments:

  1. Hurrah - FailingG, the gift that never stops giving:

    One of the biggest contractors on HS2 has launched legal action over what it claims was a botched tender, in the latest embarrassment for transport secretary Chris Grayling.

    American giant Bechtel has lodged a High Court claim against the £56bn north-south rail line after losing out on a £1.3bn contract to build Old Oak Common station in west London.

    Bechtel is already deeply involved with the high-speed rail link. It has a £170m contract to manage the second leg of the line, which runs from the Midlands to Manchester and Leeds — work it won only after a previous botched tender process was reversed... (paywall)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This refers to the "previous botched tender". Seems FailingG couldn't spot a conflict of interest for toffee, viz-Paul & Janine McDowell.


      "Engineering firm Bechtel has been named by HS2 as its preferred supplier for a major contract following a row over alleged conflicts of interest.

      US-based CH2M withdrew from the £170 million deal to develop Phase 2b of the high-speed rail network last month.

      Losing bidder Mace had threatened to sue HS2 amid concerns about its close links with CH2M and called for the procurement process to be re-run.

      Mark Thurston, HS2’s new chief executive, is a former CH2M employee, as was his temporary predecessor Roy Hill.

      A total of 25 HS2 staff have previously worked for CH2M, while 37 of the engineering company’s employees are on secondment to HS2.

      But HS2 insisted the bidding competition was “fair and robust”, with neither Mr Hill or Mr Thurston having “any input into or access to the process”.

      On Tuesday, it announced its intention to award the contract to Bechtel without re-running the exercise.

      Mace has 10 working days to lodge an appeal against the decision.

      An HS2 spokesman said: “HS2 Ltd can confirm that Bechtel are being taken forward to the next stage of the 2b Development Partner procurement process.

      “The bidder now enters the standstill period allowed for under the process prior to contract award. Following discussions, we are confident they are able and prepared to deliver the contract on time, on budget and to a high standard.”

      Transport Secretary Chris Grayling and HS2 chairman Sir David Higgins will be questioned about the issue by the Commons’ Transport Select Committee on Wednesday.

      Phase 1 of HS2 between London and Birmingham is scheduled to open in December 2026, with a second Y-shaped phase launching in two stages.

      Phase 2a from the West Midlands to Crewe will open in 2027 and Phase 2b from Crewe to Manchester and Birmingham to Leeds, will begin operation in 2033.

      Legislation for Phase 1 passed its final hurdle in Parliament in January and construction work is set to begin in the coming weeks."

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-4421466/Bechtel-named-HS2-contract-conflict-interests-row.html

      Delete
    2. And he's overseeing this debacle as well. Remember the TR sifting lottery for staff?


      "LONDON — A freight industry trade group has accused the UK government of organising a "spectacularly badly run lottery" which would see thousands of British lorries barred from entering Europe in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

      More than 11,000 trucking firm operators have applied for an ECMT permit — a document from the European Conference of Ministers of Transport without which they could not continue operating in Europe after March in a no-deal scenario — but fewer than 1,000 are available, official figures show...

      ... Multiple industry figures have accused Transport Secretary Chris Grayling of doing too little to prepare for a no-deal Brexit.

      He has overseen numerous gaffes, including a decision on Sunday to cancel a ferry contract which had been awarded to a firm which did not own any ferries, and a widely mocked rehearsal of no-deal Brexit plans which saw 89 lorries driving around a disused airport in Kent.

      The RHA's Rod MacKenzie said: "In general, business does not have a great deal of faith in the Secretary of State for Transport."

      https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit-chris-grayling-running-lottery-which-could-bar-british-lorries-from-europe-under-no-deal-2019-2?r=US&IR=T

      Delete
    3. And here's FailingG yet again displaying his magnificent grasp of running contracts:

      "In November 2014, Stagecoach and Virgin began ‘Virgin Trains East Coast’, a joint venture (Stagecoach 90% and Virgin 10%) to run trains between London King’s Cross and Edinburgh for eight years. The franchise had agreed to pay the Government £3.3 billion to run the service.

      However, just three years into the eight-year franchise, Transport Secretary, Chris Grayling reported that the franchisee will not be expected to continue for more than a few months although they will not rule out Virgin and Stagecoach re-bidding for the East Coast rail franchise. He claimed that despite the contract being terminated early, it was an issue of “not enough success, not of a lack of success” for Virgin Trains East Coast."


      So presumably the CRC companies could be regarded as being the victims of "not enough success" rather than totally fucking useless?

      Delete
    4. https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2015/01/interview-grayling-as-lord-chancellor-its-an-advantage-not-being-a-lawyer.html

      Delete
    5. What else could Failing Grayling be called?
      This is pretty funny.

      https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nickname-ideas-chris-grayling-paper-14078863

      Delete
    6. Aides of Chris Grayling asked a newspaper to stop using the nickname “Failing Grayling” to describe him, it is claimed.

      Maybe it’s upsetting the current Secretary of State for Transport. Maybe it’s become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

      After all, calls were growing for him to resign – again – following the revelation that the Government has had to pay £33million to Eurotunnel after excluding the company from its no deal Brexit planning.

      So here, collected for the first time, is an exclusive behind the scenes look at our notorious Grayling Nickname Headline Reference Sheet.

      It was done a little while ago when the MP first emerged as a major figure so it’s a little out of date. And we didn’t anticipate him having the stellar career he’s had. But here it is anyway.

      Abseiling Grayling : In case he tries rock climbing.

      Ailing Grayling : When he’s not feeling so well.

      Failing Grayling: Multi-purpose. Let’s be honest, we were thinking, he will probably never reach higher office. But, if he does, this will come in handy if he ever gets ­involved in anything like, oh, I don’t know, prisons, probation, courts, fines, training prison officers in Saudi Arabia, work programmes, ­legal aid, ­tribunals, jail ­violence, suicides, inept ­tagging systems, high-speed rail, timetable shambles, bus cuts. Or drones shutting down ­airports. Stuff like that.

      Flailing Grayling: Should he “wave or swing wildly with little control” as the ­dictionary puts it... like if he opens a car door outside Parliament and knocks a fella off his bike.

      Hailing Grayling: If taxis ever ­refuse to pick him up.

      Inhaling Grayling: If ever asked about cannabis at university.

      Jailing Grayling: Should he decide to get tough on crime.

      Mailing Grayling: If his face ever ­appears on a stamp.

      Nailing Grayling: In the unlikely event of a sex scandal.

      Paling Grayling: Should he be caught on film receiving bad news whispered to him. For example: “Chris, they haven’t got any ferries.”

      Prevailing Grayling: Erm...

      Railing Grayling: They’d never put Chris in charge of the railways, would they?

      Retailing Grayling: If he decides politics is more trouble than it’s worth and heads off to run a Woolworths.

      Sailing Grayling: Only for extreme ­circumstances. If he does ­something daft like employing ferry companies with no ferries. Something which, of course, would never, ever happen.

      Trailing Grayling: If Chris ever tries to run for leader of a political party.

      Veiling Grayling: If he wades into the burka debate.

      Wassailing Grayling: When he’s spotted carol singing.

      Whaling Grayling: In the event he ever gets anywhere near the Department for the Environment. Remember the old joke: “What do you think about whales, Chris?” “Well, Cardiff’s great.”

      I think we’ve covered everything.

      Apart from Wailing Grayling: Only to be used if he complains about a nickname given to him for his abysmal performance but doesn’t have a skin thick enough to cope with it. Oh...

      Delete
    7. Chris Grayling is the first Lord Chancellor for 440 years not to be a lawyer, but bridles at the idea that this is in any way a drawback. He considers it, on the contrary, to be an advantage, for “it enables you to take a dispassionate view”, in which you do not “favour the bar or…the solicitors’ firms”.

      Only when I transcribed the tape of this interview did I realise quite how astonishing Grayling’s remarks are. For by implying that no lawyer can as Lord Chancellor exercise impartial judgment, at least on any question affecting the legal profession, he appears to insult his many distinguished predecessors.

      Grayling believes that “people naturally fight for their own interests”. This view may be realistic, but is hard to reconcile with any idea of even-handedness, whether by a Lord Chancellor or by the judiciary.

      It is a mark of how bad relations have become between Grayling and senior lawyers, and how annoyed he is by their attacks on his lack of legal expertise, that he has launched such a counter-attack. When the Conservatives were still in Opposition, he made a reputation for himself as an attack dog, and these abilities are here deployed against his critics in the House of Lords.

      Delete
  2. Telegraph.

    Interserve has issued a warning that it faces insolvency if shareholders block a controversial rescue deal that will hand control to its lenders.

    A prospectus setting out the terms of the debt-for-equity swap, which will dilute current investors’ stakes by 95pc, insists it is “the only realistic opportunity for shareholders to recover any value in return for their investment”.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Much has been said about Graylings incompetence and his cost to the taxpayer in recent days.
      It's all true. The public purse can't afford Grayling anymore.
      But I'm pleased to read the following article which highlights the human costs of Graylings incompetent and ideological policies.
      His financial cost to society are astronomical, but it's not all about the money.
      Perhaps the human cost of this oafs idiotic fumblings should be of far more importance then his financial spendthrift approach to other people's money.

      http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/27833

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. Getafix I read and respect your posts but I had hoped that the latest narrative on grayling is rewritten to excuse him for being incompetent. He is absolutely not. He is more likely a man of low consience or regard for others. He has authority from old school privelge . He has extensive support from interest groups. He has money property wealth and takes large expenses claims for granted. Properties in London on the tax payer. He delivers fundings to privatised companies to dismiss the public sector. Reduce pensions and state costs to a single market. He lied over Brexit monies to health and wastes billions that goes to euro tunnel or whatever and then lies on the narrative for doing the deal in drugs from Europe continuity. He is delivering the Tory policy they are doing this as it is their way.

      Delete
    3. Annon@ 12:08

      Thanyou for you're post. I completely agree with your assessment of Grayling. He disgusts me, and I'm abhorred by his selfish abuse of the power his position affords him,and his contempt for those that do not belong to his ideology and 'class'.
      Yet I feel a little afraid to express his 'failings' on a platform such as this blog from a more politically opposed perspective.
      His usual defence for criticism is that its an attack from left wing activists, reds under the bed and Union led left wing looneys.
      Critisising him from a politically opossed stance, IMHO, affords him the defence of polarised political ideology,and an abstract argument. Whereas his cost to the taxpayer spans all ideological arguments, its just cold pounds, shillings and pence.
      I absolutely agree with your opinion wholeheartedly, but I'd hate to cut him any slack by allowing him a political defence.
      Thankyou again for your well phrased and thoughtful comments.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    4. This one's for Getafix (from ConHome link above):

      Grayling: “There was never a ban on books for prisoners. It was a fabrication by a left-wing pressure group. We never had any discussions at all. The only change we actually pushed through was to harmonise the rules that existed across the prison system. There’s never been the freedom to send parcels into prisons. You get one when you’re sentenced but after that it’s exceptional circumstances. The Howard League decided that one of the things this involved was books so therefore created a great campaign around books.”

      ConHome: “Why weren’t you able to squash this campaign?”

      Grayling: “Oh I talked to them endlessly, but it’s the kind of thing where the Left gets terribly excited.”

      ConHome: “You’re smiling. You actually quite enjoyed this, I get the impression.”

      Grayling: “Oh it was infuriating. When something is lobbed at you which is completely untrue, sometimes if people carry on saying it, it’s believed. It was never true in the first place.”

      Delete
    5. "When something is lobbed at you which is completely untrue, sometimes if people carry on saying it, it’s believed. It was never true in the first place.”

      Long term economic plan?
      Brexit means Brexit?
      Just £46 in their pocket?
      £350m for our NHS?
      On and on and on......

      Delete
    6. So Mr Justice Collins was just pissing about in the High Court was he, Chris, you numb ignoramus:


      The blanket ban on sending books to prisoners in England and Wales has been declared unlawful by the high court.

      Mr Justice Collins has quashed the ban imposed by the justice secretary, Chris Grayling, and ordered him to amend his policy on what can be sent to prisoners.

      In his ruling, the judge said that it was strange to treat books as a privilege when they could be essential to a prisoner’s rehabilitation.

      “A book may not only be one which a prisoner may want to read but may be very useful or indeed necessary as part of a rehabilitation process,” he said.

      https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/05/prison-book-ban-unlawful-court-chris-grayling

      Delete
    7. Thanks getafix. 1208 of course you have covered the issues well. I think we might all be minded grayling might just be grossly negligent. I really think it is deliberate. When the Tories fall grayling will have 3 new consultancy jobs a million a year. One in euro tunnel for euro relations. Another in Virgin for developing rail links. Last one in social policy how to help kill innocent people and get paid well and be exempt. John MacDonald claimed on opposition Ben he would hold grayling to account for any deaths. Been a bit quiet there John. How much evidence do you need.

      Delete
  3. It's our money he is throwing down the drain. How long have we had austerity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/03/at-last-we-are-turning-away-from-our-mania-for-hiving-off-public-services

    ReplyDelete