Well, another milestone rapidly approaches with the blog due to sail past the six millionth 'hit' some time today. It's taken us 15 months to clock up this million, whereas the last only took just over 12, a fact that neatly confirms what this graph and my instinct tells me, namely that interest is steadily waning, but has picked up a bit since TR2 came over the horizon. What is still quite evident is that every time probation hits the news, this blog becomes the go-to-place:-
But to be honest, I'm really not sure where things go from here. Some time ago the blog became dedicated to a fight for the soul and survival of something that I feel was worthwhile, honourable and just plain 'right'. It's been a big part of my life ever since I first set foot in a probation office and felt immediately 'at home'. It seems to me we've won all the arguments; garnered all the evidence; recruited all the malcontents; identified the humbug; called-out the hypocrisy and recorded the time-line, but despite all our efforts, are we really any nearer to recovering much of our profession?
Despite recent confirmation that TR is officially dead, many of us remain to be convinced that TR2 can be prevented, but even if it is, do we really want to become re-united under Civil Service command and control? I think not.
"End of an era....NPS saying fond farewell to Michael Spurr, who has spent his career promoting the best of prison and probation. Thank you Michael." Kilvinder Twitter 29/03/19
Understandably, many good people can only have so much energy for fighting and the inherent negativity can be draining and not at all healthy for anyone in the long term, myself included. Not surprisingly many people have 'moved on', a fact that is not lost on those in government, MoJ or the privateers and other 'chancers' determined to never admit that TR was a total fucking disaster and simply carry on regardless. I sense the inevitability of a steady decline for the blog. I've already written regarding a noticeable drop-off in the quality and quantity of contributions, a situation unlikely to improve I suspect.
As many are aware, other social media platforms are available, which is just as well given that the heavily-moderated Napo members 'Forum' died a death some time ago, either through deliberate act or simple carelessness. Facebook has become the new platform of choice for many, especially the notoriously 'secret' group with an impressive 2,200 members, including some contributing Napo staff.
Despite the description and as is often highlighted, this group cannot be regarded as 'secret' and it must be assumed employers and others read it. Despite this, many people are signed-in under real identities and the discussion is often informative, thought-provoking and lively, just such a shame that it is neither public nor secret, but sort of 'semi private'. A bit like Freemasonry, it must irritate some potential members if they fail to find a way of gaining access. Just as there are potential issues posting on such a site, there are also pros and cons with anonymous contributing, as on the blog. 'You pays your money and takes your choice' as they say.
Starting this blog was the easiest thing in the world. Although inordinately time-consuming and on occasions stressful, it's also been a great privilege and mostly enormous fun, but I know full well that deciding how it ends and when is going to be one of the hardest decisions I will ever have to make, but not just yet some will be relieved to hear. I think there is still a bit more mileage left before I'm willing to give up and concede defeat, but dear reader, to a large extent it depends on you, your continued interest and most important of all, your contributions!
Thanks for making the blog what it continues to be - the go-to-place for probation.
Thanks for all you've done Jim by being the instigator of this blog. Still the most important part of my day morning, noon and night checking out the comments etc. I think the downward content of some comments may come from frustration regarding the bloody mindness of the Tory ideology regarding outsourcing against all evidence to the contrary about it's worthiness.
ReplyDeletePlease stay around to see this TR2 debacle fall on its face, or as I suspect TR3 will take it's place following some remarkable "New figures" supporting it, and a "Promise" to listen to the Dame Glenys and such. If TR3 is to take place then I think you will have taken it as far as you can.
Thanks Jim.
An absolute massive thank you to you Jim as this blog is also my go to first thing in the morning and various times during the day - so informative and up to date. Not quite sure that any of us can predict what's next but hope it's for the better - I myself are really not sure how much longer I can hang in with this debacle ( I work within an Interserve CRC ) the short staffing , high case load and constant target chasing , it's exhausting and completely demoralising - let's see what's next ! and who's left !! But thank you again as this blog is a mammoth task x
ReplyDelete6 million. Wow. I came to this blog as a direct consequence of seeing a Probation Service smashed by a rampant, ruinous and myopic revolution. The problem with revolutions is that people get hurt and the void they create is open to being filled with further chaos. Amongst many other issues this blog has chronicled the course of that revolution and the history writers will surely have a feast of material available to them when they come to write it up (and they surely will). Congratulations pricipally to JB and then to all who have contributed to keep this beacon alight. May it burn a while longer yet.
ReplyDeleteWonder if these are the same 6m who signed the A50 .gov petition? *cheeky grin, wink, chef's kiss*
DeleteThanks for sticking with it.
ReplyDeleteThe more it goes on the more I can see that the demise of probation as a social work agency requiring consent from clients and part of the judiciary, mostly overseen and ultimately managed locally by Magistrates' Committees was a gradual process over decades - crucially advanced by Labour's 2007 Offender Management Act which permitted the split and outsourcing and advanced by the Lib Dems introducing 2014 Offender Rehabilitation Act which was enthusiastically supported by the Conservatives, their senior partners in Government
What has become glaringly evident is an absolute failure of Parliament(s) to hold Government(s) to account and thoroughly test new legislation before it is implemented. The parliamentary failures made all the more obvious by the way the European Union Membership continuation referendum was implemented and the absolute failure of parliament to act in the nation's best interest on the outcome, having raised the expectations of UK Subjects that we will become a more independent nation once more.
I note a Tweet today that even hints at sadness at the lack of the Magistrate's Committees involvement in probation oversight.
I feel that I colluded with much of which happened earlier and was ignorant of the actuality of the gradual centralisation of probation until it was too late to even protest against it happening.
https://twitter.com/minifeet2/status/1111172689715171329
Thanks for preserving Jim. I gave up reading the blog in 2017 as I was becoming too enraged by the collapse of probation and what i thought were the ideals that underpinned practise. This was at that time occupying far too much of my headspace to be healthy. I've since mellowed a little and came back to it a year and a half later. I find it's as informative and as necessary as ever. I think it's important as a practitioner to try and understand the power structures that govern us workers and particularly the clients we serve, this blog provides much of the knowledge needed to do that so thank you Jim and other contributors here.
ReplyDeleteThank you Jim. I am not in the Facebook group but read this blog pretty much every day, often several times a day. I post occasionally, probably not as much as I should.
ReplyDeleteKeep the faith, Jim. The blog is an important & invaluable resource.
ReplyDeleteHoC Hansard 05 February 2019
Mr Gauke - We have made it clear that the probation system needs to improve, and we have taken decisive action to end current community rehabilitation company contracts and to develop more robust arrangements to protect the public and tackle reoffending... I believe that public, private and voluntary organisations all have a role to play. The reforms that we are making are crucial to integrating the system better so that different providers can work more effectively together, and we will set out our proposals later this year.
Alex Cunningham - I am grateful for that comprehensive answer but, in the light of the prisons Minister’s praise at our last session of Justice questions for the not-for-profit Durham Tees Valley CRC... may I ask how the Secretary of State will protect this rare success story, given that his own reprivatisation plans are set to allow security giants such as Sodexo to swallow it up?
Mr Gauke - I, too, pay tribute to the work of that not-for-profit CRC and its focus on rehabilitating offenders. The expertise and commitment of not-for-profit organisations are vital in helping offenders to turn their lives around, and the changes on which we are working will ensure that the probation system benefits from having a diverse range of providers, while also doing more to deliver operational stability.
Grahame Morris - I thank the Secretary of State for his answer, and for drawing attention to the statistics that we have seen in Durham. However, probation failures cause reoffending and place strains on already overburdened police resources. Will the Secretary of State consider meeting police and crime commissioners such as Ron Hogg, Durham’s police, crime and victims commissioner, who happens to head the only outstanding police force in the country, to discuss the devolution of probation services so that they can be tailor-made to meet the needs of local communities?
Mr Gauke - I have already met a number of police and crime commissioners to talk about this very issue, but I should be happy to meet Mr Hogg, as well as other PCCs, to discuss these matters again. We want to ensure that PCCs can play a full and active role in this process, and I am heartened by the determination and willingness of many of them to do all that they can to help to develop it and to ensure that we have a strong probation system.
Thanks for your tenacity in maintaining this blog. It has allowed us insight to whats happening in other parts of the country. It's enabled us to know what's happening across the divide. It's offered more genuine information than the union, unlike the union it's free. It is a testament to the failure of TR.
ReplyDeleteJim
ReplyDeleteThis blog has helped us all have a platform to praise and grumble. It is sad to read reports of the demise of probation but this blog let's us all know that its happening nation wide and not just in our own area. How else would we know? I'm aware of the 'secret' Facebook group from reading your blog but don't know how to join it. The media, until recently, have ignored our plight. Therefore your blog has been invaluable and still is, as the 'go to' for information.
I value this blog and thank you for your dedication.
"
ReplyDeleteUnderstandably, many good people can only have so much energy for fighting and the inherent negativity can be draining and not at all healthy for anyone in the long term, myself included."
You might find this an interesting read Jim, if only because it reaffirms what you already know and feel (and many others).
https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-24/edition-3/are-you-being-outsourced
'Getafix
A very thorough coverage of the issues in this scholarly article. Here's the intro:-
DeleteAn increasing number of people are being transferred to other organisations with no choice on the matter. Often, their jobs become less secure, and they may face further switches of employer. There is an increased possibility that psychologists (particularly occupational and counselling psychologists) will meet up with clients who have experienced this process. Outsourcing is a significant experience for those concerned, and as psychologists we should be interested in how changes in work patterns affect people and society. This article will show the many ways in which psychological theories can inform this experience and how we as psychologists can help those involved.
How did you choose your current employer? Unless you work for yourself it is likely that you chose the organisation you are currently with. Even if it was the only job available, you probably felt you had some degree of control over the process. However, employees are increasingly being transferred to other organisations through a process of forced transfer, often termed ‘outsourcing’.
Outsourcing is a fast-growing phenomenon; in the UK alone thousands of staff every year are transferred through an outsourcing contract. The new coalition government policies are likely to increase outsourcing substantially. As psychologists, we may well come across those who have experienced this process, and I would argue that it is important to understand the context of this form of change at work, and how we could help.