Tuesday, 12 March 2019

Happy Birthday Web!

This blog would not be possible without a whole host of improbable things coming together, not least the remarkable technological developments that have revolutionised the sharing of information. For those of us with long memories it started with the humble General Post Office and Prestel (I was a very early adopter with Homelink in 1983) and although history hasn't been kind to that memory, we are all familiar with this:-   

30 years on, what’s next #ForTheWeb?

Today, 30 years on from my original proposal for an information management system, half the world is online. It’s a moment to celebrate how far we’ve come, but also an opportunity to reflect on how far we have yet to go.

The web has become a public square, a library, a doctor’s office, a shop, a school, a design studio, an office, a cinema, a bank, and so much more. Of course with every new feature, every new website, the divide between those who are online and those who are not increases, making it all the more imperative to make the web available for everyone.

And while the web has created opportunity, given marginalised groups a voice, and made our daily lives easier, it has also created opportunity for scammers, given a voice to those who spread hatred, and made all kinds of crime easier to commit.

Against the backdrop of news stories about how the web is misused, it’s understandable that many people feel afraid and unsure if the web is really a force for good. But given how much the web has changed in the past 30 years, it would be defeatist and unimaginative to assume that the web as we know it can’t be changed for the better in the next 30. If we give up on building a better web now, then the web will not have failed us. We will have failed the web.

To tackle any problem, we must clearly outline and understand it. I broadly see three sources of dysfunction affecting today’s web:


  1. Deliberate, malicious intent, such as state-sponsored hacking and attacks, criminal behaviour, and online harassment.
  2. System design that creates perverse incentives where user value is sacrificed, such as ad-based revenue models that commercially reward clickbait and the viral spread of misinformation.
  3. Unintended negative consequences of benevolent design, such as the outraged and polarised tone and quality of online discourse.
While the first category is impossible to eradicate completely, we can create both laws and code to minimize this behaviour, just as we have always done offline. The second category requires us to redesign systems in a way that change incentives. And the final category calls for research to understand existing systems and model possible new ones or tweak those we already have.

You can’t just blame one government, one social network or the human spirit. Simplistic narratives risk exhausting our energy as we chase the symptoms of these problems instead of focusing on their root causes. To get this right, we will need to come together as a global web community.

At pivotal moments, generations before us have stepped up to work together for a better future. With the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, diverse groups of people have been able to agree on essential principles. With the Law of Sea and the Outer Space Treaty, we have preserved new frontiers for the common good. Now too, as the web reshapes our world, we have a responsibility to make sure it is recognised as a human right and built for the public good. This is why the Web Foundation is working with governments, companies and citizens to build a new Contract for the Web.

This contract was launched in Lisbon at Web Summit, bringing together a group of people who agree we need to establish clear norms, laws and standards that underpin the web. Those who support it endorse its starting principles and together are working out the specific commitments in each area. No one group should do this alone, and all input will be appreciated. Governments, companies and citizens are all contributing, and we aim to have a result later this year.

Governments must translate laws and regulations for the digital age. They must ensure markets remain competitive, innovative and open. And they have a responsibility to protect people’s rights and freedoms online. We need open web champions within government — civil servants and elected officials who will take action when private sector interests threaten the public good and who will stand up to protect the open web.

Companies must do more to ensure their pursuit of short-term profit is not at the expense of human rights, democracy, scientific fact or public safety. Platforms and products must be designed with privacy, diversity and security in mind. This year, we’ve seen a number of tech employees stand up and demand better business practices. We need to encourage that spirit.

And most important of all, citizens must hold companies and governments accountable for the commitments they make, and demand that both respect the web as a global community with citizens at its heart. If we don’t elect politicians who defend a free and open web, if we don’t do our part to foster constructive healthy conversations online, if we continue to click consent without demanding our data rights be respected, we walk away from our responsibility to put these issues on the priority agenda of our governments.

The fight for the web is one of the most important causes of our time. Today, half of the world is online. It is more urgent than ever to ensure the other half are not left behind offline, and that everyone contributes to a web that drives equality, opportunity and creativity.

The Contract for the Web must not be a list of quick fixes but a process that signals a shift in how we understand our relationship with our online community. It must be clear enough to act as a guiding star for the way forward but flexible enough to adapt to the rapid pace of change in technology. It’s our journey from digital adolescence to a more mature, responsible and inclusive future.

The web is for everyone and collectively we hold the power to change it. It won’t be easy. But if we dream a little and work a lot, we can get the web we want.

Sir Tim Berners-Lee

16 comments:

  1. BBC website:-

    Wandering round the data centre at Cern, Sir Tim Berners-Lee was in a playful mood, remembering how he'd plugged the very first web server into the centre's uninterruptible power supply over Christmas so that nobody would switch it off - only for the whole place to be powered down.

    But as we talked about what had happened since he submitted his proposal for the web 30 years ago - described by his boss as "vague but exciting" - Sir Tim's mood darkened. In the last few years, he told me, he'd realised it was not enough to just campaign for an open web and leave people to their own devices.

    Sîr Tim has a plan - the Contract for the Web - to put things back on the right track but it depends on governments and corporations doing their part, and the citizens of the web pressing them to act.

    When, as my last question, I asked Sir Tim whether the overall impact of the web had been good, I expected an upbeat answer. Instead, gesturing to indicate an upward and then a downward curve, he said that after a good first 15 years, things had turned bad and a "mid-course correction" was needed.

    His brilliant creation has grown into a troubled adolescent - and Sir Tim sees it as his personal mission to put the web back on the right track.

    Sir Tim's vision was "at once utopian and realistic", said Jonathan Zittrain, author of The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. It rested on the idea that a free and open web would empower its users, rather than reduce them to simply being consumers, he explained.

    "I see Tim's letter not only as a call to build a better web, but to rededicate ourselves to the core principles it embodies," he told the BBC. Those principles, he said, included universality of access and transparency - the ability to see and understand how web applications work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Incredible to think that the web is so young, taken for granted and in every aspect of our lives. Recently I have become concerned at how much racist and bigoted sharing and posting of seemingly compelling and factual information has emerged that is nothing more than lies and fear baiting. Similarly these dark arts used to undermine political opponents, democracy and elections. It is difficult to imagine what the answer is to these issues but answers do need to be found.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Insomniac cure read this lot you'll be asleep by thethe eig line.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ah. but that luvverly webthing helps us dig up gems like this, from Guardian 14 March 2016:

    "Ministers have ordered an immediate inquiry into allegations that former senior civil servants from the Ministry of Justice have used their Whitehall knowledge and contacts to help private companies secure government contracts worth millions.

    The inquiry follows a Mail on Sunday investigation which questioned the role of a director of a consultancy, TDPi, whom they named as Tony Challinor. Challinor is the former chief executive of the MoJ’s commercial arm, Just Solutions International, which was shut down last year in a row over a Saudi prisons contract.

    The prisons minister, Andrew Selous, said the reported allegations involved claims that former MoJ employees had behaved improperly and that knowledge they may have acquired while working for the department had been used to gain a competitive advantage.

    “We take all allegations of impropriety extremely seriously,” said Selous, adding that an immediate investigation had been launched with Cabinet Office support.

    “The rules around former civil servants taking up employment in the private sector are made very clear when they leave. Under no circumstance should they exploit privileged access to government contracts or sensitive information which could be used to influence the outcome of commercial competitions,” he said.

    The Mail on Sunday said that Challinor was one of several senior MoJ officials who had recently left Whitehall to take up jobs with TDPi. In the months before they left their Whitehall jobs, TDPi’s UK branch had helped secure contracts that would be worth more than £600m by 2020 for a US company, MTCnovo, to run probation services in London and the Thames Valley as well as Rainsbrook secure training centre in Northamptonshire.

    Challinor, who was also head of commercial development for the prisons and probation service, says in his Linkedin profile: “After a brief period of retirement from the UK civil service I am leading a new company building on the work I previously delivered.” He left his role as head of commercial development at the national offender management service in December after more than four years in the post.

    Challinor goes on in his profile to highlight his experience in creating a dedicated MoJ team to develop solutions for governments and criminal justice agencies around the world and says he hopes to develop this work through the TDPi consultancy. The paper also named a second former MoJ official who had a senior role in the department’s international and market development unit.

    Selous added in a written ministerial statement to MPs that the MoJ had improved its commercial capability in the last six months by doubling the senior commercial experts monitoring work with the private sector.

    A spokeswoman for TDPi told the Mail on Sunday that Challinor had followed the recommended procedures and had never worked for MTC Novo. Challinor declined to comment."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tony Challinor

      Title: Director
      Company: TDPi
      Bio: Tony Challinor is Director of TDPi, a specialist consultancy helping Governments and private sector organisations globally to develop and improve their justice and correctional services. Tony was Head of Commercial Development between 2012 and 2015 within the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), an agency of the Ministry of Justice in the UK. He led the development of new operating models, including developing mutuals and supporting the development of a competitive market for NOMS business, payment by results and social impact bonds. He also had responsibility for international links and benchmarking of best practice; for external funding through European bids and partnerships; and established a Trading Arm to generate income. In 2003 Tony became Executive Director of the largest single offender rehabilitation programme in Europe, PS Plus within Her Majesty’s Prison Service. He moved to this role from Connexions where he was Director, specialising in educational achievement and employability for young people facing complex and multiple barriers to success, whilst leading Drug Action Team work and sitting on two Youth Offending Team Boards. In 2013 Tony undertook a post-graduate degree on Complexity Theory in Leadership, and applied this in the creation and leadership of a new commercial consultancy team within NOMS offering support to international corrections services

      Delete
  5. https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/49m-pledge-help-tackle-reoffending-15963139

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A guarantee to put up to £4.9m towards a probation contract on Teesside has been given the thumbs up.

      Stockton Council leaders backed a move to continue funding ARCC (Achieving Real Change for Communities) - the not-for-profit service which oversees 70% of offenders in Durham and the Tees Valley.

      The probation system was changed in 2014 - with the National Probation Service created to deal with "high-risk cases" while the remaining work was meted out to 21 "community rehabilitation companies" (CRCs). Much of Teesside is covered by the Durham Tees Valley CRC - which is owned and run by ARCC. It oversees more than 4,000 offenders and council leaders agreed to back a fresh bid for the group to run a new contract.

      Cllr Steve Nelson, cabinet member for community safety, praised ARCC for its leadership approach and was pleased with its performance. He added: "Part and parcel of the success of ARCC has been we're not paying off money to shareholders and the city. Any savings are going back into services - I think that was the right decision. ARCC is in a good position to bid for this wider regional bid - I would be happy with it in the national domain but we are where we are and being number one out of 21, I think we do it the best."

      Changes to the probation service have not been smooth. The National Audit Office (NAO) has said reforms to the system had been "extremely costly" for taxpayers since they were rolled out in 2013. The MoJ is lining up another replacement of the existing model which would see Durham Tees Valley CRC cover the whole of the North-east. Under the new proposals, the existing contracts will end two years early in 2020 - to be replaced by one of 10 new CRC contract areas.

      But the panel heard details on the MoJ's fresh changes were still thin on the ground. Leader Cllr Bob Cook said everyone had said the government "was going down the wrong road" when it changed the system in the first place. "We've seen failures on some of the contracts coming to an end shortly," he added. "The one that we developed in the Tees Valley and Durham is led by different local partners and health providers as well. It's a contract which needs to be out there - it would have been better if it had still been run by the government agency which used to run probation - but this is the next best option."

      ARCC is made up of Stockton, Redcar and Cleveland and Darlington Councils as well as Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS trust, social housing provider Thirteen Group and other charitable trusts. The Durham Tees Valley CRC received an overall "requires improvement" rating from the Chief Inspector of Probation Dame Glenys Stacey this month. The inspector urged improvement to its work in domestic abuse cases and keeping children safe but there was praise for its leadership, organisation and staff. A bid for the group to run the new probation contract is being drawn up and is expected to go to the MoJ later this year.

      Cllr Nelson hit out at the wider changes to the probation service - branding its part-privatisation a "complete waste of time, money and resources." He added: "This position was 100% based on political dogma - there was never any talk about efficiency, or protecting the public or providing the best rehabilitation services for offenders - it was pure political dogma. Fortunately, we made the right decision, it's been well handled and we're well placed to move forward."

      Delete
  6. While everyone's attention was on HoC & Brexit stuff, C4 news has highlighted a new privatisation procurement for an Integrated Health Assessment Services windfall worth £3.1bn for the usual suspects:

    "DWP under the Health Transformation Programme (HTP) are exploring the future delivery of Health Assessments with the objective to transform the health and disability assessment services provided for people with disabilities and health conditions.

    The Health Assessments help by providing advice to DWP Decision Makers to determine eligibility for benefits paid to claimants across a range of benefits including Personal Independent Payments (PIP) Employment Support Allowance (ESA), Universal Credit (UC) and a number of smaller benefits.

    Currently the services are delivered through a multi health assessment provider base with varying commercial and delivery operating models. The aim of the transformed service will be a more effective, efficient integrated service for customers.

    II.1.5) Estimated total value

    Value excluding VAT: 3 150 000 000.00 GBP"

    ReplyDelete
  7. In a similar vein the Govt has published amended KSS contracts, in the light of Working Links' demise:

    "The need for modification has been brought about by external circumstances which a diligent contracting authority could not have foreseen, namely Working Links and its’ CRCs going into administration on 14.02.2019 resulting in the need to place the services with a different contractor(s) for a period which is (a) too long to permit the use of the contingency mechanism in clause 6 of the original contracts but (b) too short to make it economically or technically feasible to re-let the remaining term of the Working Links CRCs' contracts to an economic operator other than an existing CRC(s).

    VII.2.1) Description of the modifications

    The authority has made the following variations:

    — to add the services that were previously provided by the Working Links CRCs in three separate contract package areas (Wales; Bristol, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire; Dorset, Devon and Cornwall) to the Contract (Services),

    — incorporate a mobilisation and transition plan for KSS to take over the Services in a managed way and provide for payment for mobilisation activities and transition costs,

    — incorporation of some necessary additional service specification obligations specific to the three geographical areas being taken over,

    — replication and adaptation of existing payment mechanism to also incorporate the services,

    — specific provisions to deal with staff transfers and apportioning related risks,

    — technical drafting amendments to maintain the status quo and provide operationally for separation of activities and reporting within each separate contract package area,

    — technical updates to reflect operational changes, e.g. subcontractors/premises to be operated from etc.

    The contract value of 111 300 000 GBP stated in Section VII.1.6) above relates to the additional Services for the period 15.2.2019 to 4.12.2020 only. The authority has also submitted a Contract Award Notice for publication.


    Updated total contract value before the modifications (taking into account possible earlier contract modifications and price adaptions and, in the case of Directive 2014/23/EU, average inflation in the Member State concerned)

    Value excluding VAT: 149 933 000.00 Currency: GBP


    Total contract value after the modifications
    Value excluding VAT: 261 233 000.00 Currency: GBP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wales; Bristol, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire; Dorset, Devon and Cornwall will cost the taxpayer about £5.1m a month for the next 22 months

      Kent, Surrey, Sussex will cost about £6.8m a month for the next 22 months.

      Delete
    2. No doubt for a pile of tosh called seetec profit over sense no use to anyone in criminal justices.

      Delete
    3. In 2013/4 Kent Probation Trust report shows an annual operating budget of some £19m, of which £15m was staffing costs. Approx £1.6m/month

      In 2013/4 Surrey & Sussex PT report shows an annual operating budget of £25m, of which £18m was staffing costs. Approx £2.1m/month

      Add together: £3.7m/month
      KSS CRC alone is costing £6.8m/month

      So where are the savings when its costing more than £3m a month extra just to fund the CRC.

      ???How much is the budget for NPS in the SE???

      How much EXTRA is this TR scam costing us, the taxpayer?

      Delete
    4. A lot more no doubt Seetec produced their annual accounts and have taken advantage of a legal clause secreting out their profits figures. Don't you just love the crooks in charge of probation these days.

      Delete
    5. incorporate a mobilisation and transition plan for KSS to take over the Services in a managed way and provide for payment for mobilisation activities and transition costs,
      Will this money pay for all the Senior managers exits as they see the current leader depart with a pocket full of cash. Who next and why did they not bail out working Links then?

      Delete
    6. Lets try applying the same principle:

      Devon & Cornwall PT - £19m budget / £15m staffing
      Dorset PT - £9m / £7m
      Wiltshire PT - £7m / £5m
      Avon&Somerset PT - £19m / £15m
      Gloucester PT - £8m / £6m
      Wales PT - £57m / £40m

      Tot = £119m annual operating cost = £9.9m/month for six complete Trusts

      Current combined CRC budgets = £5.1m/month to fund three CRCs.

      Again, what might the NPS SW & Wales budgets be in addition?

      Delete
  8. Tories sell everything screwed society kids being murdered lawless youth in gangs maybot mayhem . Worst cuts to police sold probation as scrap home office history a joke now pm lost Brexit incompetence yet still in office while the Tories continue their theft of all public funds.

    ReplyDelete