Sunday 8 September 2024

Probation Reality of Early Release

This came in yesterday and highlights the grim reality for many probation staff:-

Hi Jim,

I would prefer this is kept anonymous for obvious reasons.

Today, I was at work. Today, I actually cried at my desk. If that isn't horrible enough, two other colleagues were in tears at other parts of the day too.

I speak as a qualified PO. It is unsustainable. I haven't felt like I've been able to fully help someone in months, there have been no wins.

We all know the problem areas; housing, substance misuse support and mental health treatment are struggling as much as we are, but it feels like we are the only ones expected to take on more and more. Empty the prisons onto our caseloads with no extra resources and expect miracles.

In the last 36 hours I've recalled two people, mostly because their needs haven't been met adequately, either through lack of provision in the community or lack of proper focused work in custody. I imagine other POs have exceeded that particular disgraceful statistic.

SDS40 is a longer term plan really. And I fully understand something needed to happen, but there has been absolutely no meaningful emergency support for us. I've lost track of our staffing numbers. At least 3 long term off sick, and other leavers roles not filled. I haven't seen a temp in my office in about 18 months.

Oh, but why am I complaining? Because after reset my WMT is under 100%. So no overtime for me. Even though I am sending this at 10 o'clock on a Friday night and my last email sent for work was at about 7.

Anon

--oo00oo--

This from the Guardian on Friday:-

Some probation officers given a week’s notice of serious offenders’ release, union says

Exclusive: Napo says officers do not feel protected as 2,000 offenders to be let out early to try to ease prison crisis

Probation officers have been given as little as a week’s notice to prepare for serious offenders to be freed in England and Wales under the government’s early-release scheme, the Guardian has been told.

About 2,000 prisoners are expected to be let out on Tuesday 10 September amid warnings of a coming spike in crime. But members of the probation officers’ union Napo were only informed on 3 September that this would include some serious offenders being released into their supervision.

Officers are usually given more than three months to prepare services to help monitor and rehabilitate a serious offender. The development comes as the prison population reached a record high on Friday.

The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said in July that the SDS40 scheme – under which offenders with standard determinate sentences will be released after they have served 40% of their term – would be introduced in September to give the Probation Service time to prepare.

Tania Bassett, a national official at Napo, said: “Our members from across the UK have not been given eight weeks to prepare for the high risk of harm of some dangerous offenders. We have received reports of late information about releases from the north-east, Reading and other areas. In some cases, our members were told on Tuesday – a week before the early release date – that serious offenders would be released in their area.”

She said the number of recalls of offenders was expected to rise because of the increased workload on officers. “If prisoners are released so late that our members are given a few days to prepare for people who may be serious offenders, then, inevitably, recalls are likely to go up.”

While the majority of people being released under the scheme will be lower-level offenders, there have previously been serious incidents after prisoners were released on licence, including Jordan McSweeney, who murdered two days after he had been recalled to prison.

The union said some members have said the early release scheme has left them feeling further exposed to persecution if their clients commit a serious offence. One officer told the union: “We don’t feel protected. It feels like the service doesn’t care about us.”

The probation watchdog has told the Guardian that “a small proportion” of the 2,000 offenders due to be freed could be expected to go on to commit serious crimes.

Martin Jones, the chief inspector of probation in England and Wales, said that late information about who was being released would place “huge additional pressures” on probation staff.

“The eternal optimist says that the scheme will go well. But the realist in me says that some of those released will go on to reoffend, and a small proportion of those will be serious offences,” he said.

About 300 offenders on probation commit serious further offences every year, which relate to specific violent or sexual offences that make them a particular risk to the public.

Under the SDS40 scheme, an estimated 2,000 prisoners serving sentences of less than five years will be released on 10 September, followed by a further 1,700, who are serving sentences of more than five years, on 22 October.

The scheme was announced by Mahmood days after the general election amid warnings that the criminal justice system was on the brink of collapse.

Official figures showed there were 88,521 people in prison on Friday, 171 more than the previous record set at the end of last week.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “The new government inherited a justice system in crisis, with prisons on the point of collapse. It has been forced to introduce an early release programme to stop a crisis that would have overwhelmed the criminal justice system.

“That is why the new lord chancellor announced in July that she was scrapping the previous government’s early release scheme, replacing it with a system which gives probation staff more time to prepare for a prisoner’s release and a live database for affected cases that staff can check in real time.”

--oo00oo--

Postscript

David Shipley, a former prisoner who now writes about prison and justice issues, and who has written for On Probation, is writing an article for the Spectator about the dangers and extra pressure for Probation staff as a result of SDS40. He would welcome any anonymous quotes and views from current probation staff. David@david-shipley.com

23 comments:

  1. To the officer struggling, please take care of yourself and accept that the task you are expected to complete is not achievable or acceptable. Nor is this job we signed up for. Everyone of us is trying to deal with this in our own way, but know your worth and stop trying to do the impossible and spend your energy winning the small battles.
    The fact that there is no recognition by senior leaders of the impact on staff of ECSL and SDS40, the lack of overtime payment for staff is a very clear message to me that they don’t care. I stopped doing the extra hours a long time ago. I focus my time on the people’s needs but as a result get on the shit list for missing targets. I no longer care. Time leaders and HMPPS learned they can’t have it all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read this comment, and it sounds just like me. I have worked for the company for 15 years, and for the past year, I have given up and stopped trying to do the impossible. There is no overtime. Leadership preaches about wellbeing with one hand but turns a blind eye to admin, PSOs, POs, and court staff regularly working 60+ hours a week for no extra pay just to hit ‘targets. I would say to anyone reading this, it's not you it's a systematic issue that needs to change.

      Delete
  2. It would help if sex offenders had been included in SDS40 especially those with stable homes to go to which is many of them, if only you'd refrain from ludicrously overused exclusion zones. Why? It's because this cohort is least likely to reoffend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just what is the point of shoving thousands more through the probation experience?
      What's gained? What's achieved? Who's served?
      I understand the need to free up prison places, but why, why oh why, why, why, why is there a need to shove everyone leaving custody through the probation service?
      How many could be released with conditions but with no supervision? The courts release many people many charged with serious offences and with previous custodial sentences on bail on a daily basis with the understanding that breaching bail may result in being remanded in custody. Their bail conditions are not supervised by probation. The same sentiment could be applied to many of those leaving custody.
      A simple metric could be applied. Who needs to be on probation and who doesn't!

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. And get rid of PSS as well.

      Delete
    3. Why? Some short term prisoners want probation support.

      Delete
    4. 'Getafix' that is absolutely spot on! There are offenders who will need the supervision and there are those that quite simply don't and will comply without it.

      Delete
    5. Everyone on probation wants support but no-one gets any anymore.

      https://insidetime.org/mailbag/no-home-back-to-jail/

      Delete
    6. All most need is a referal to drug services or accommodation.

      Delete
  3. Why no focus on removing IPP prisoners, remand prisoners for low serious and first time offences, youth offenders under aged 18 from prisons. There’re many better ways to reduce the prison population.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. Prisons are still reviving prisoners with really short sentences. All that can be done is the paperwork to get them in and then straight out. Fixed term recalls are also a massive waste of resources

      Delete
  4. They're shoving them through to the grind mill of probation to cover their backs. When interacting with the prisons they often ask if you're going to be responsible for this person's risk on release. Of course, ask the prison if they've done any meaningful/tangible offence-focused work or resettlement and it's nearly always a 'no'- and they're not pulled up for that. So long as it's allocated or dumped on a PO or PSO, the prison has done their bit. You would think there would be some blue sky thinking around releases so Probation isn't so sullied with even more work. It also looks like Starmer has been doing a 'Sunak' and telling the public that no high risk will be subject to SDS40, despite Starmer, when in opposition, criticising Sunak for the same stance. Clearly this s not true. There will be a mixture of risk levels for SDS40 cases and Starmer should know this, especially being a previous head of the CPS- the reality is dawning on him. Anyway, as things change they seem to stay the same. Clearly the backlog of cases for Probation Reset wasn't anything to do with our wellbeing but to increase capacity for SDS40, so we can't complain. But, as is so often the case, you hit one case with a mallet and then another pops up beside you and so on and so forth. Even though they're saving thousands by having releases, they are not matching or giving any of those savings to Probation. The job feels like little more than a tick box for risk management and hope for the best. All the underlying concerns remain unaddressed. I'm sorry the original poster feels the way they do. I don't think anyone who doesn't care deeply about this job hasn't had dark nights of the soul and reflected seriously on the point of it all when it''s being marginalised by the powers that be for a very long time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you need to do some research on OMIC.

      Delete
    2. I think prisons should buck their ideas up.

      Delete
  5. Where exactly does managements responsibility for the health and safety of their staff begin and end?
    The chief officers should be instructing staff to work to contracted hours as a means of protecting themselves against claims that employees have been injured mentally, physically and psychologically through working excessive hours.
    They can hardly say they are not aware of what is going on so either they don’t care or they are willing to take the risk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the only reason they reduced cases was via Probation Reset and not because have been crying out for change or a case cap for years and only to support prisons and reducing our ability to push back, you can bet that your health and wellbeing becomes secondary to this masterplan.

      Delete
  6. "Just what is the point of shoving thousands more through the probation experience?"

    Simple.

    Arse covering.

    Didn't anyone tell you?

    Probation staff are being used as arse coverers.

    Compliance with organisational "CYA": While not explicit in any probation job description it is necessary that you absorb, accept &/or deflect any criticism directed at hmpps &/or the criminal justice system as a consequence of political &/or senior management decisions.

    https://www.ckju.net/en/blog/why-cover-your-ass-phenomenon-warning-sign-and-what-do-against-it

    Enjoy your daily shit sandwich.

    Love & Kisses,
    Antonia, Amy, Kim, Phil, Ian, Alan, Sarah, Helen, Sarah, David Chris, Dominic, Hannah, Jim, Matt

    p.s. this Labour govt ain't gonna make your life any better than its been for the last decade, so don't count on improved pay or terms & conditions. We certainly won't countenance jeopardising our privileged positions, so you should expect to see the underside of a bus anytime soon.

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6627b896d29479e036a7e665/HMPPS_Organisation_Chart_April_2024.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very similar to what i wrote- glad there's a consensus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice to see a reprise of that Ernie Wise line : )

      Delete
  8. From today's Telegraph (paywall).

    "Prison early release scheme could be undermined by increase in recalls, justice sources fear
    More than half of inmates freed early ‘bounce back’ into the system due to homelessness or probation breaches, senior MoJ insider says"

    Of the 2000 to be released tomorrow, I can't help but wonder how many of them will be back in custody before the end of the month?
    It's not just probation that will be impacted by such a large number of releases on one day. Addiction agencies, job centres, housing etc will all be impacted upon.
    Some of those being released will have prearranged appointments that can't be keep simply because of the time it will take to process and discharge so many prisoners in one day through prison receptions.
    Are they likely to be back in custody before those appointments can be rearranged?

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  9. 06.19 I don’t disagree with you but the bottom line is that they have a duty of care to their employees.
    Perhaps the unions should be looking at test cases and bringing private prosecutions.

    ReplyDelete
  10. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/new-change-to-some-offenders-automatic-release-dates

    Serious and violent offenders can be released early as long as they are serving less then 4 years.

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5dn9jg5elo

    Up to 1,750 offenders are spending their last night in prison before being released under the Ministry of Justice’s emergency plan to ease the overcrowding crisis in jails.

    Releases are due to begin on Tuesday morning as governors unlock cells under the plan to free up 5,500 beds.

    One charity has warned that women and children will become the unintended victims of the emergency plans - while rehabilitation specialists fear any rushed releases will compromise vital work in turning around the lives of some offenders.

    It’s also unclear whether everyone being released definitely has accommodation to go to, a crucial part in keeping ex-offenders off the streets.

    ReplyDelete