Friday, 6 September 2024

Probation Over Capacity

This confirmation of the situation from Channel 4 News Sept 3rd does not bode well for the impending emergency release of prisoners:- 

The probation service for England and Wales has been working over capacity every month since January 2023, FactCheck can reveal.

Figures obtained exclusively from the Ministry of Justice show the service has consistently been working at around 120 per cent capacity – meaning the average officer has about six days’ work to do in a five-day week.

Our findings come as the government plans to release around 2,000 prisoners on a single day next week as part of plans to ease overcrowding – which is expected to put even more pressure on the probation system. FactCheck takes a look.

How are probation workloads calculated?

Probation officers have access to a “workload measurement tool“ which estimates how many hours of work are required to manage their caseload. If an officer is assigned a certain case, the tool will estimate how many hours of work that case will likely demand from the officer.

We understand that the percentage workload compares the estimated number of hours it should take to manage all of an officer’s cases, to the amount of time that officer is actually contracted to work.

So if an officer has 12 hours’ worth of work to do, but only 10 hours in which to do it, they would be deemed to have a workload of 120 per cent.

Exclusive FactCheck figures

We obtained exclusive data about probation workload through a Freedom of Information request to the Ministry of Justice. The data shows that the probation service – which covers all of England and Wales – was working at an average of 120 per cent capacity across the months of 2023.

For an individual officer, this would be equivalent to having six days’ worth of work to do in a five-day working week. And the service has been working at 117 per cent capacity on average in 2024 so far. The data for 2024 goes up to June.


It’s important to note that the figures come in the form of snapshots – telling us about a single day at the beginning of the relevant month.

Even worse than the data shows?

The Ministry of Justice highlighted that the workload measurement tool data is “based on averages and assumptions, and gives an overall measure [of workload] across the system”.

It pointed out that as the tool is based on estimates, it is not a perfectly accurate reflection of real-life workload, or the “peaks and troughs of sentence management”.

NAPO, the union representing probation officers, told FactCheck that the workload measurement tool often underestimates how much time a given probation case will actually require from an officer. The union said that this means the percentage workloads calculated by the tool are understated too.

‘Excessive’ workloads?

The probation service has its own measure of overwork. It says that if a probation officer is working at 110 per cent capacity for four weeks in a row, their workload is “excessive”.

Our exclusive data suggests that the average officer would have been above this threshold in every month since January 2023. However, since we don’t have data on the workload of individual officers, we can’t say for certain how many officers were over this threshold for every week in the month.

But the probation officers’ union told us that they have anecdotal evidence of many of their members regularly working at 150 per cent capacity. (We put this to the Ministry of Justice, which did not directly respond to the claim.)

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson told us: “The new Lord Chancellor has already committed to recruiting 1,000 new trainee probation officers to bolster the supervision of offenders, ease workloads and better protect the public. We’ve also brought forward planned pay rises by six months meaning entry level frontline staff will receive a bonus of more than £1,000”.

19 comments:

  1. "97% of probation service isn't hitting minimum standards"

    After an interview with Val Wawrosz (tempus novo*), who warned of pure chaos with the new mass release scheme, partcularly its impact upon ROTL prisoners who are employed, Shaun Ley (bbc the world tonight) spoke to Martin Jones, probation inspector - not an impressive appearance, but at least jones did repeat his admission (made in another recent bbc programme about ipp sentences) that 97% of probation areas failed to meet minimum standards, that the probation service is stretched beyond reason and that the extra mass releases in Sept & Oct will not end well... probably leading to another prisons crisis in early 2025 through a combination of lack of accommodation, lack of supervision, lack of employment ... basically a lack of planning by everyone.


    There was also this from Sima Kotecha:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/c0l85nrd573o

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clynxgr464eo

    *https://www.tempusnovo.org/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well All under-18s have been removed from Scotland's young offenders institutions. That’s how they reduced prison capacity.

    Their probation officers are trained criminal justice social workers and their approach is evidenced based. I wouldn’t be surprised if their next move is to seal criminal records for convictions committed and completed under 18 years old.

    If the best England and Wales can do is repeat the headline “committed to recruiting 1,000 new trainee probation officers” then probation remains stuck up the wrong end of a creek without a paddle.

    Bringing forward a pay rise we would have got anyway which nobody has yet received and giving bonuses that come with eligibility conditions won’t retain the probation officers we already have.

    Give us the 5% and bonus handed to prison based HMPpS staff.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c78ljg04818o.amp

    ReplyDelete
  3. What about the reports of inadequate practice, racism and discrimination?

    https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/media/press-releases/2024/08/essexnorthpdu2024/

    https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/media/press-releases/2024/08/bedfordshirepdu2024/

    ReplyDelete
  4. As the C4 whistleblower Ive been feeding relevant information to C4 about the ongoing crisis in probation for around 2 years. I do question why Napo is almost timid on these issues? I have re-joined Napo after leaving during TR. The craziness of the "Responsive Mgt Hubs" needs exposing. In case folk see me as a scare-and- doom monger, Im involved in some positive partnership working in my PDU, northern England. Plenty of ideas for reforming and rejuvenating Probation too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why so few probation people speaking up ?

      Delete
  5. When the custodial period is reduced to 40% from 50% it will also mean that many prisoners will be eligible for release on tag a lot sooner then they normally would be.
    Figures give an indication of how many may be released automatically on the 40% mark, but how many more could be released because they are now eligible for tagging sooner?

    https://insidetime.org/newsround/early-release-means-earlier-tag-dates/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many didn't need to be there in the first place?

      Delete
  6. Just read article in the Guardian that NAPO is stating “Some probation officers given a week’s notice of serious offenders’ release”. That is misleading as whatever we may feel about release at 40% the criteria was completely clear that it was based on current sentence and not risk so obviously “serious offenders “ whose current offence meets criteria will be released earlier than half way. The problem is there have been so many changes, officers are overwhelmed trying to meet pointless targets and managers aren’t communicating (or understanding) the changes.
    I am currently based in custody and in our area “crib sheets” detailing changes and impacts and what is required have been sent out so community colleagues can understand- not to be prison centric but to try and help!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No actually new cases are being added daily. Not all prisons are updating and calculating at the same rate. So yes probation is being informed about some 10th Sept releases at short notice.

      Delete
    2. My point being the list of offences eligible was available so even if you didn’t have new release date managers should have identified which cases . So failure of management which has led to frontline staff having short notice.

      Delete
  7. I'm so glad 'entry' level staff will get a £1000 bonus, that's exactly the best way to retain experienced staff!

    As an aside, have any areas actually started offering the mythical enhanced overtime yet!?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well C4 why not look at the so called excellent leaders we have in Probation? What is their accountability for this disaster? How have they allowed staff to work with consistent excessive case loads? Have they ever stood up for the overburdened front line NO their attitude is JFDI. They are more responsible for this mess than anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  9. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/prisons-early-release-probation-chief-martin-jones-b2581484.html

    https://shows.acast.com/trapped-the-ipp-prisoner-scandal/episodes/prison-crisis-the-chief-inspector-of-probation-martin-jones-

    https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/addressing-prison-capacity-pressure/

    Its not as if there's a lack of information about the probation service's situation, just (i) a lack of interest in that concern, (ii) a lack of action &/or (iii) a lack of understanding about the consequences of the lack of interest or action

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1944143/keir-starmer-prison-release-fears/amp

      Delete
  10. This whole desperately stupid & dangerous farce is an artificial shitstorm created & imposed by a succession of incompetent bullies & self-aggrandising wannabes who have plundered the public purse for their own enrichment at the expense of frontline staff & those supposedly being supervised by the probation service.

    As 21:52 rightly says, the media should be digging deep into the causes of this nightmare, naming & shaming the architects of the chaos... Hint: there's a busload of them at hmpps.

    Grenfell, Post Office, IPPs, PPE, TR... just a few examples of scandalous abuses enacted & covered up by the self-defined 'elite', the "strong & excellent leaders" (who, never forget, continue to live in abject [sic] luxury with very, very healthy bank accounts).

    Who is accountable for handing £80+millions of public money to the CRCs from the "Modernisation Fund"?

    £80+million of public money used to make hundreds of experienced probation staff 'redundant' so the privateer CRC books would balance & TR would look the success it never was.

    This not a crisis in isolation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What’s a few £million to sort out probation when the UK will give Ukraine £3bn a year ‘for as long as it takes’?

      Delete
  11. Article fails to recognise the Prioritisation framework. WMT scores are based on workload and expectations demanded by green PPF. Most of the country in amber or red so WMT is a fairly worthless indicator of workload as a result.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Green PPF is a load of bollocks anyway, we should work to National Standards end of.

      At the point of reunification the Head of West Midlands sent a letter stating by March 2023 PO's caseloads would be in the mid 20's...obviously in recognition that a caseload of this size was desirable and manageable. This still remains and unachievable dream yet we get reported if we miss targets when our caseloads are at least double what 'they' promised us...

      Delete