Whilst many of us absorb the many insights and revelations now put on the record by former SPO Alison Moss, it got me pondering just how rare are the examples of probation officers going public and saying what the situation is really like. We've often talked of the cloak of secrecy so-beloved of the Civil Service tightening around staff and putting them in fear of speaking out about anything, but a Google search reminded me of the following I spotted on the socialcare website a year or so ago:-
My job as a Probation OfficerDiane Wills explains why her job as a Probation Officer is more complicated than people first think.
What does your role entail? What do you do?
This is a routinely asked question where I struggle to find an appropriately succinct and satisfactory answer. My response depends a little on my mood, my state of mind, and my fluctuating sense of confidence. I am a company director running a business delivering criminal justice and social work services. My route to this point has been one which has twisted and turned with the cadence of life.
I am a Probation Officer by profession, qualifying in 2001; one of the first cohorts to be controversially separated from the social work qualification in the late 1990s by the then, Conservative government. The Diploma in Probation Studies was introduced by the ‘New Labour’ government shortly afterwards.
How did you become a Probation Officer?
My years in the London Probation Service have influenced and moulded my entire career. My tendency towards extremes meant that post-qualifying I excitedly entered straight into a public protection team. I relished the fast pace, the high risk, the challenging training and the support and friendship of my colleagues. Even at the time, I had a sense of these being my ‘halcyon days’ and knew I had to work extremely hard and take advantage of every opportunity offered to me.
As a result, I left as an accredited groupwork facilitator with a national training post and a secondment to the Home Office under my belt. By then, I was a specialist working with men who sexually offend, and this remains my core business today. In my sixteen years of post-qualifying experience, it is an area of work which has gradually become very high profile, attracting much media and police attention. There is rarely a day when there is not a news item associated with sexual harm.
Being somewhat impulsive, I moved to Scotland for a few years, where I discovered that they have no probation service. Justice is a devolved matter since the Scotland Act 1998, and remains under the auspices of social work. I somewhat begrudgingly met the requirements of the Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC), and became a registered social worker, gaining valuable experience working with children and families, including disabled children and short break foster carers.
I had some existing experience in English social work. For some years prior to qualification, I worked as a part-time adviser for an emergency duty team, which gave me a good grounding in legislation in relation to emergency child protection, older people and mental health measures, as well as the concept of thresholds and gatekeeping. I also had a short stint as a complaints investigator in adult social care. This seems an oddity now without a social work qualification, but I managed to demonstrate the requisite skills and knowledge to come first in the interview process.
I later qualified as a Practice Educator, a role in which I am still actively engaged, with undergraduate and postgraduate students now in the South West of England. This allows me to keep up to date with rapid changes as well as gaining knowledge of a wide range of social work arenas. I thoroughly enjoy working with students, helping them to aspire to be the best practitioners they can be; the aspiration I still hold for myself.
How have things changed throughout your career?
The National Probation Service has changed beyond all recognition, consolidated by the ‘Transforming Rehabilitation’ agenda and the marketisation of justice services. Aligned with these changes, work with sexual offenders has gradually been overtaken by forensic psychology services. Most of my current training and operational experience is now theoretically located within this field.
What experience do you need?
Spanning three disciplines allows me to hold a position, in which I can offer multiple perspectives and approaches. A broad theoretical understanding enables me to apply a depth and richness to my work, with each discipline adding a different dimension to my thinking and understanding. The core of my experience is my probation background, bringing criminological understanding of crime and punishment, the law and the complex nature of ‘risk’.
Added to this, is my social work experience, which has provided me with a valuable understanding of diversity, social injustice, and acceptance of the sheer messiness of life. Forensic psychology brings hard science into my practice, adding a sharpness and confidence in my case formulations. Whilst these disciplines can be dichotomous in the learning experience, the way they bisect and overlap allows me the freedom to traverse a range of skills, methodologies and ideologies to the way I work.
What is it like working as a Probation Officer?
I love my work. There is a privilege and an indulgence to working at such a deep level with individuals, which I know is what draws a lot of practitioners to working in social care, but tends to be missing in the day to day grind of caseloads. I am not afraid of the dark in people, and this is where I spend a lot of my time; with the demons and the pain. I’m not sure what this says about me but I don’t dwell on this too much. Perhaps counter intuitively, this enables me to work with men with considerable empathy and compassion.
My career has taken turns which I would not necessarily have chosen, nor anticipated. With hindsight, there are many decisions I would have made differently. Nonetheless, my experience has allowed me to establish a unique professional outlook. I am indeed grateful for every opportunity I have been afforded. My career continues to develop in ways I would never have considered at the outset. This is exciting and helps to maintain my interest and passion. The question of ‘what I do’ remains elusive.
Diane Wills
15 August 2017
--oo00oo--
This was the follow-up nine months later:-
Why I won't return to the Probation Service
Diane Wills explains the changes and difficulties in the National Probation Service since the late 1990's.
As an independent practitioner with a small business specialising in working with perpetrators of sexual harm, I often work on a contract basis. For a short period, I have returned to frontline service in the National Probation Service where it has been a shock to find out how difficult things have become in the current political and economic climate.
How the role has changed
Making sense of my experience, I can see that there is misalignment between the role as it used to be and what exists now. Most of my current work relies on my assessing and analytical abilities. I originally learned these skills as a probation officer, but these are no longer valued or even necessary. The job now largely entails writing mechanistic reports for the Parole Board on service users I may have briefly met via video link (or not at all) and is based on scant information held on the inefficient and clunky information system.
What purports to be a risk assessment is a procedural ‘painting by numbers’ reductive approach to managing risk; a reactive and defensive organisational attitude that must surely be borne out of an oppressive and threatening culture from central government. There seems little case formulation regarding individual service users. Worryingly, I see no evidence of current research being utilised; the only mention being policy documents with little critique.
Relentless targets
The targets are relentless and I am directed to prioritise these above all else including directly assisting those already in the community. Perhaps what surprises me above all else is the seemingly unquestioning response from my over-worked colleagues who effectively shrug their shoulders, resigned to this dystopic vision of offender rehabilitation.
I trained within the risk paradigm in the late 1990s and understand the need for organisational accountability, but the service I left has been decimated. When I was previously a Probation Officer, I enjoyed it so much that I would have worked for free. I now feel bullied, depressed and professionally compromised. The experience has been bewildering and I am left wondering how on earth professionals survive in public services today.
Luckily, there are alternative professions which those motivated to work with offenders can enter. Administratively there is the civil service route or clinically there is forensic psychology as well as a variety of other non-statutory roles. There are still ways of having a very satisfying career, and one can only hope the probation service returns to its core values.
Diane Wills explains the changes and difficulties in the National Probation Service since the late 1990's.
As an independent practitioner with a small business specialising in working with perpetrators of sexual harm, I often work on a contract basis. For a short period, I have returned to frontline service in the National Probation Service where it has been a shock to find out how difficult things have become in the current political and economic climate.
How the role has changed
Making sense of my experience, I can see that there is misalignment between the role as it used to be and what exists now. Most of my current work relies on my assessing and analytical abilities. I originally learned these skills as a probation officer, but these are no longer valued or even necessary. The job now largely entails writing mechanistic reports for the Parole Board on service users I may have briefly met via video link (or not at all) and is based on scant information held on the inefficient and clunky information system.
What purports to be a risk assessment is a procedural ‘painting by numbers’ reductive approach to managing risk; a reactive and defensive organisational attitude that must surely be borne out of an oppressive and threatening culture from central government. There seems little case formulation regarding individual service users. Worryingly, I see no evidence of current research being utilised; the only mention being policy documents with little critique.
Relentless targets
The targets are relentless and I am directed to prioritise these above all else including directly assisting those already in the community. Perhaps what surprises me above all else is the seemingly unquestioning response from my over-worked colleagues who effectively shrug their shoulders, resigned to this dystopic vision of offender rehabilitation.
I trained within the risk paradigm in the late 1990s and understand the need for organisational accountability, but the service I left has been decimated. When I was previously a Probation Officer, I enjoyed it so much that I would have worked for free. I now feel bullied, depressed and professionally compromised. The experience has been bewildering and I am left wondering how on earth professionals survive in public services today.
Luckily, there are alternative professions which those motivated to work with offenders can enter. Administratively there is the civil service route or clinically there is forensic psychology as well as a variety of other non-statutory roles. There are still ways of having a very satisfying career, and one can only hope the probation service returns to its core values.
Diane Wills
10 May 2018
The government has settled with former civil servant Sir Philip Rutnam over his claim for unfair dismissal. The ex-Home Office official quit last February, amid bullying claims against Home Secretary Priti Patel, which she denies.
ReplyDeleteHe said he had been the victim of a "vicious and orchestrated" briefing campaign after trying to get Ms Patel to change her behaviour. The claims had been due to be heard at an employment tribunal this September. The Home Office said the government and Sir Philip had "jointly concluded that it is in both parties' best interests to reach a settlement at this stage. The government does not accept liability in this matter and it was right that the government defended the case," a spokesperson said.
The BBC understands the former official is receiving a substantial settlement. Sir Philip said Home Office staff had come to him with allegations against Ms Patel, including "shouting and swearing" and "belittling people".
His resignation led the Cabinet Office to launch an inquiry into whether Ms Patel had broken the code governing ministers' behaviour. Boris Johnson's standards chief Sir Alex Allan found that she had - but the PM rejected his findings and kept her in post. Sir Alex resigned in response. Ms Patel apologised for her alleged behaviour, saying "any upset I have caused was completely unintentional".
£340,000 + legal costs to date.
DeleteNot bad, eh? Well done UK govt. You "do not accept liability in this matter" but you've given a third-of-a-million taxpayer pounds away to protect one of your own. Priti shitty decision if you ask me.
Its as much, if not more, than the Scottish Govt is being lambasted over in respect of the Salmond case.
DeleteWee Nicola spent a whole day, 9am to past 5pm, being grilled by a committee who were incensed at the loss of those taxpayer pounds.
So when will we see Johnson, Patel, Hancock Williamson, Gove et al being similarly roasted for their roles in the losses of £billions of UK taxpayer pounds???
Blimey! I did nothing wrong once. I had a job, then I didn't because of a contrived, constructed process whereby they said they couldn't afford to keep all the jobs going (even though they paid themselves much more than they used to get); then they stole most of my redundancy money & threatened me if I didn't take what was offered. No-one gave me £300,000 to keep my gob shut. Maybe its time to write a book? Maybe I'll ask Alison for some top tips... I've still got the emails & the letters.
DeleteThe settlement is only for this Employment Tribunal claim. There are two other claims that are being pursued through other legal recourse.
DeleteNobody else even slightly irritated by Diane Wills' somewhat self-aggrandising account of her career, reading more like a job application or LinkedIn profile? Even more confusing given the complete volte-face in the mere 9 months between August 2017 and May 2018. Its not entirely clear whether she was actually a Probation Officer when enthusing about the role in 2017. I'm certainly not going to say the work or the culture has improved - it definitely hasn't. But I sense a bias here that might be more about Diane's current 'business' interests than a careful comparison of Probation then and now. Has Diane been competing with the Probation Service for work, or perhaps her business hasn't been securing the anticipated contracts with HMPPS to deliver work alongside the Probation Service? Given that Diane seems to have returned to the job she hates in recent years, I can only assume the business wasn't working out. Just saying.
ReplyDeleteI did make similar observations myself - by "independent contractor" I assume she means she was a temp through an agency? That said, she does make some very relevant points and makes them well. Risk assessment and parole reports have indeed become "painting by numbers" and case formulation has become mechanistic, done only by "qualified PD psychologists". The damage OASYS has done and then the re-damage through QA tools has left us de-skilled and depressed, knowing that none of it makes a blind bit of difference but do it to their exacting standards due to fear of sacking and criticism in face of an SFO.
Delete21st Century Tory Britain - judge says its all perfectly normal
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/mar/04/family-of-man-who-starved-to-death-after-benefits-cut-loses-case-against-dwp
"Errol Graham, a 57-year-old grandfather, weighed just 28kg when he was found dead at home by bailiffs sent to evict him in June 2018, eight months after all his benefits were stopped because of his failure to attend a fit for work assessment.
An inquest in 2019 found that DWP and NHS staff had missed opportunities to save Graham, and the coroner concluded that “the safety net that should surround vulnerable people like Errol in our society had holes within it”.
Judge: “Despite the tragic circumstances of this case … the claimant falls well short of establishing that the defendant failed to comply with” its duty to make reasonable inquiries into all relevant matters."
"Ground breaking" news. The wheel can be reinvented, even if reluctantly, and ever so slowly.
ReplyDeleteWho would have thought that a social work, rehabilitation approach may have an impact on reoffending?
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3-million-pilot-to-reduce-reoffending-by-young-adults
'Getafix
Well spotted as always 'Getafix!
DeleteThe trauma stuff is good. I am a bit reserved about the Personality Disorder stuff: always resistant to theory/practice which is rooted in the idea the problem is not with the shit state of the economy and our society, and any new clothes the HMPPS Emperor gets of on. In my book, (evidenced based) work is simple: forge good relationships, manage the risk, advocate your socks off for the client. The less simple thing is the skills, experience and training that make that work. But none of the above much boosted by the shitshow of initiatives, projects, beaurocracy, contract-management, and other needless complexity that is strangling us.
ReplyDelete