Thursday 25 March 2021

MoJ Beseiged

Anyone watching Antonia Romero, the new Permanent Secretary, performing in front of the Justice Select Committee on Tuesday could be forgiven for thinking everything is pretty much hunky dory at the MoJ. Unfortunately for her, this published yesterday from the Public Accounts Committee, paints a rather different picture:- 

“Besieged” prisons, probation & courts can’t provide justice for “victims, offenders, taxpayers or society”

In its report published today the Public Accounts Committee says the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) "faces significant risks across the full range of its services, without a clear sense of prioritisation" and huge backlogs that have built up are causing "unacceptably long waiting times for people to access justice".

MoJ does not have a clear sense of priorities as it attempts to manage significant change in every part of the system - court reform, building new prisons and introducing, again, a new model for delivering probation services – currently all at critical stages, alongside an expected increase in demand as government implements its plans for 20,000 new police officers and sentencing reforms start taking effect.

A major programme of building new prisons is underway but threatened by an "eye-watering maintenance backlog of around £1 billion" which "poses a real threat to achieving a safe and secure prison estate".

The significant funding uplift for MoJ in the 2020 Spending Review, which included £4 billion for new prison places and £119 million to support the justice system’s recovery from the pandemic, is welcome but comes against a backdrop of deep funding cuts over many years.

Restrictive regimes in prisons during the pandemic have significantly impacted the wellbeing and life chances of prisoners, making it critical that the MoJ and HMPPS accelerate their work to improve the mental health of prisoners.

Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said:

"Victims and witnesses waiting in limbo because of the long waits for a day in Court mean justice is too often being delayed to the point of being denied. The prison estate is creaking and the new prison building programme is still years off completion. The promised extra 20,000 police will create more work for courts and prisons and put more pressure on an already severely overstretched system.

A prison system operating with a dangerous maintenance backlog continues to swallow billions of taxpayers money but fails to deliver the key benefit society expects from that investment. The probation system is still reeling from 2014's massive and catastrophic experiment in reform and its juddering reversal.

Our justice system is besieged on all sides and it is not clear the MoJ has a firm grip on this challenge even with a desperately needed funding boost. This isn’t justice for victims, offenders, taxpayers or society."

Summary

The justice system is under unprecedented pressure. The Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) is facing significant risks across courts and tribunals, prisons and probation services as it attempts to recover from the pandemic and make progress with ambitious change programmes. The court reform programme is in its final phases but still not in the clear; a major programme of building new prisons is underway but threatened by an eye-watering maintenance backlog of around £1 billion; and HM Prisons and Probation Service (HMPPS) an executive agency of the Ministry, is in the process of reunifying the probation service. These are daunting challenges, made more difficult by the need to plan for and manage the expected surge in demand across the criminal justice system from the recruitment of 20,000 new police officers.

The response to the pandemic has exacerbated existing pressures on the justice system. The backlog in the court system means unacceptably long waiting times for people to access justice. We remain unconvinced that the Ministry and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have robust plans in place to manage the challenges in the court system, and for reducing the huge backlogs that have built up.

We are also concerned that restrictive regimes in prisons during the pandemic have worsened prisoner wellbeing and mental health, and social distancing has made the effective provision of rehabilitation and probation services much more challenging. While we are encouraged by HMPPS’s plans for managing the risks in the prison system and probation services, the maintenance backlog poses a real threat to achieving a safe and secure prison estate.

After sustained pressure on its finances, the Ministry received a welcome uplift in the 2020 Spending Review, including £4 billion for new prison places and £119 million to support recovery from the pandemic. Even so, its long-term funding position remains uncertain and hampers its ability to make credible plans to address the risks it faces.

Conclusions and recommendations

1. We are concerned that the Ministry faces significant risks across the full range of its services, without a clear sense of prioritisation. The pandemic has exacerbated the pressure on the justice system and the systemic issues that we have pointed to in the past. Aside from its work to support the justice system to recover from the pandemic, the Ministry has a complex portfolio of 15 projects listed in the Government’s Major Projects Portfolio. Many of these projects are at critical stages, including court reform, building new prisons and introducing a new model for delivering probation services. The Ministry was unable to tell us how it planned to prioritise its efforts as it manages significant change in every part of the system alongside an expected increase in demand as government implements its plans for 20,000 new police officers and sentencing reforms start taking effect. The Ministry and its agencies welcome the significant uplift in the 2020 Spending Review, which included £4 billion for new prison places and £119 million to support the justice system’s recovery from the pandemic, but recognise that this is against a backdrop of deep funding cuts over many years.

Recommendation: In the absence of clear sense of its priorities, the Ministry should set out what contingencies it has if it encounters difficulties delivering its change programmes across courts, prisons and probation services.

2. The pandemic has significantly impacted the wellbeing and life chances of prisoners, making it critical that the Ministry and HMPPS accelerate their work to improve the mental health of prisoners. The need for restrictive regimes to maintain social distancing in prisons during the pandemic has exacerbated the existing mental health challenges that prisoners face. In 2019–20, the incidents of self-harm in prisons remained high, particularly in the female prisoner population. We welcome HMPPS’ work to specifically address the issues facing female prisoners, including maintaining family contact and one-to-one counselling support. It is vital that HMPPS continues to learn lessons from how it manages the impact of the pandemic on prisoner wellbeing and that it sustains this work in the long term. We are encouraged by HMPPS’s commitment to improve its work with others, including the Samaritans and CLINKS.

Recommendation: In its Treasury Minute response to this report, the Ministry and HMPPS should set out what progress they have made with the initiatives they put in place to support prisoner mental health since the beginning of the pandemic and the impact this has had on those in prison.

3. We have limited confidence in the Ministry’s plans for reducing the backlog in the court system, particularly in criminal courts. The backlog in criminal courts was growing before the pandemic, and many organisations have warned that it could take years to clear the backlog. But the Ministry and HMCT could not tell us what level of outstanding caseload is, in their view, acceptable. It is therefore not clear to us what the Ministry is aiming for in its plans to reduce the backlog. What is abundantly clear is the impact that delaying access to justice has on victims and witnesses, who in some cases find themselves waiting years to access justice. There is a risk that the Ministry is overly relying on the potential of technology to manage the increased demand in the court system, without yet having a clear understanding of how the rapid expansion of remote justice impacts on court users or justice outcomes.

Recommendation: The Ministry should write to the Committee within one month to set out its plan, including clear projections and timeframes, to reduce the backlog in the court system, particularly in criminal courts where the backlog is most acute.

4. Despite previous warnings, the Ministry and HMCTS do not yet have a firm grip on the data they need to understand how effective the court reform programme is or its impact on users. Despite past delays, the Ministry says that the court reform programme was on track to deliver to its revised timescale. The pandemic accelerated plans to introduce more video hearings, and it says that delays to other areas of the reform programme are within planned contingencies. The Ministry recognises that collecting the right data consistently is key to understanding whether its reforms are working and how they are impacting users in the justice system. It has plans to publish the data it has collected on the impact of remote hearings, but we are disappointed that it does not yet have a better handle on what data it needs to assess the success of the court reform programme. This is particularly worrying given our past recommendations and those published in the 2019 Digital Justice Report the Ministry itself commissioned. The Ministry accepted all the recommendations, but it appears not to have made any tangible progress.

Recommendation: In its Treasury Minute response, the Ministry should explain how it is managing the impact of the pandemic on the court reform programme, including its plans to respond to the recommendations set out in the 2019 Digital Justice report.

5. We remain concerned that the maintenance backlog poses a real threat to achieving a safe and secure prison estate able to accommodate future prison populations. The latest spending review settlement included a welcome boost of £4 billion in capital spending to support building new prisons, but only £315 million set aside for maintaining the prison estate. With a maintenance backlog valued in November 2019 at nearly £1 billion, this is significantly below what is required to maintain decent, safe prison places. The Ministry’s one-year settlement for revenue funding does not support the long-term planning that is required, and that we have repeatedly called for, to support the effective management of the prison estate. As we have seen in other sectors, there is a risk that without enough money to address resource pressures, the newly announced capital funding could end up being redirected to plug holes in the budget. The Ministry and HMPPS are confident that enough prison places are planned to meet anticipated demand, but there remains significant uncertainty in the justice system. For example, how new police officers are deployed could have significant implications for the demand for prison places.

Recommendation: As part of setting out a long-term strategy for managing the prison estate, the Ministry should explain how it will:
  • work with others in the system, including the Home Office to refine its understanding of demand for prison places; and
  • reduce the maintenance backlog in the existing prison estate
6. Despite the efforts of staff during the pandemic, there are clear signs of strain on people working across courts and tribunals, prisons and probation services. We remain concerned about the unprecedented pressures facing frontline staff at this time. HMPPS says that probation officer caseloads are high but manageable, and that it is seeking to address high and unbalanced caseloads for probation officers as part of the unification of probation services in June 2021. HMPPS also says that managing prison staff absences during the pandemic has been a big challenge, though at the time of our evidence session, 10% of prison staff were absent, and more staff are returning to work. We welcome the news that HMPPS has pressed on with recruiting new prison officers, particularly given the expected increase in the number of prisoners as government recruits 20,000 new police officers.

Recommendation: The Ministry, HMCTS and HMPPS should identify and agree with relevant professional bodies specific actions to support staff working across the system to manage the strain of pandemic recovery efforts, and how it will monitor and support staff through to the end of the pandemic.

15 comments:

  1. The minutes remind me of the Ursula Brennan days... Romeo was clearly not in the same form when she sat before the PAC:

    https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/1791/default/


    Romeo: That is why I have made it already — I have discussed this with the Lord Chancellor— a big focus. We have to ensure that we are collecting the data. Consistency is crucial. The integrity of the data is crucial. How do the systems speak to each other? This is not, of course, just an MOJ issue, because we also have to make sure that our data is speaking to the data that the CPS has, and the data that the Home Office has, and other partners in the system. What I think I can say is that I and the team are very seized of this and very focused on it. You mentioned data modelling. I think we have, by the way, some excellent data modellers already. We have some excellent analysts....

    After some considerable waffle...

    Romeo: To your main point, it is fair to say that this Committee has scrutinised the reform programme closely. As you all know, we have put a number of things in place since then — [Interruption.] Is someone trying to stop me?

    Chair: It is just that we need slightly more precise answers.

    Romeo: Let me let Kevin [Sadler] answer on the programme.


    Probation specific questions seem to start at Q49

    Farrar: We monitor the caseload of probation officers, and we know their caseloads. We know that they have been high and, particularly for the NPS, that the case mix has changed since we introduced the system of CRCs and the NPS. We know that we need to make sure that they have more balanced caseloads; that is why we are investing the extra £155 million in the service. That will mean more staff and lower caseloads, but it will also improve our IT to ensure that people are able to do things more efficiently

    Farrar: Yes, and we do rely on our local probation leaders to monitor the caseloads of their staff. It very much depends on the people; each case is individual. Sometimes a higher caseload might be manageable, but a lower caseload might involve a lot more detailed work. At the moment, the information that I have is that caseloads are high but manageable

    Farrar: We are working with the police and the Home Office to try and understand more about what the focus of those [newly recruited] police officers will be. Obviously, some of it will be on reducing reoffending, where they will work closely with probation officer on integrated offender management.


    By Q58 its back to prisons.


    Farrar: Our published projection figures say that we think the prison population will be just over 98,000 in September ’26.

    Romeo: The final thing to say is we did, of course, in this year’s SR, SR20, get an extra £275 million uplift for that demand — so specifically for both Covid and the 20,000 additional police officers.

    *** why is she so hung up on 20,000 police officers? Unless that merger back into Home Office is truly on the cards...? ***

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So farrar says:

      * We monitor the caseload of probation officers, and we know their caseloads

      * we do rely on our local probation leaders to monitor the caseloads of their staff

      * We know that they have been high

      * At the moment, the information that I have is that caseloads are high but manageable


      Is that really how it is? Manageable?

      Delete
    2. And don't expect any immediate relief in June 2021:

      farrar: we will not split caseloads immediately or bring them together. We will do that over a period of some months to ensure that people have the necessary training.


      And another fallacy is repeated & promoted by farrar:

      "integrated offender management is a different way of working that doesn’t increase caseloads, but it helps to manage things more proactively."

      No, it doesn't increase a *caseload* per se but it DOES mean a shitload of intensive work, hours of legwork, etc.

      How easy it is for these spreadsheet managers to glibly dismiss the efforts of frontline staff.

      Most of the time & words spent in both PAC & JSC were wasted; words that just filled the ears with noise & time that filled the pockets with public cash.

      Lets be honest, besides hearing about the possible size of budgets, the increase of new prison places from 10,000 to 18,000 and the numbers of new police officers, the MPs never got anything out of either of those hearings except the same non-answers, the same waffle, the same non-specific bullshit, the same misleading nothingness.

      How much do those meetings cost the public? They are meetings where MPs are supposed to hold departments to account, not least for the use of public money.

      And neither PAC nor JSC did that. Its as if they were bored &/or browbeaten into accepting that no answers were "very helpful" - then everything carries on as if nothing happened.

      Delete
  2. Justice explained:

    Antonia Romeo: Of course, capacity in the justice system is a range of things, so I do not think that capacity—how one says it is capacity constraints. As I say, we have more jury rooms available now than we had pre-pandemic. Sitting days is one element, the flowthrough is another element, judicial time — there are all sorts of things that feed into that. And it’s not a smooth and easy algorithm to understand, or to work out what it
    is.


    Ta-Dahhh!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I imagine romeo is on quite a decent salary. At DIT she had a pay increase in 2020 which took her to £170-175,000. At that time heaton (her predecessor at MoJ) was on £190-195,000.

      https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/senior-officials-high-earners-salaries#history


      The 2020 spreadsheet reveals 553 civil servants or similar in receipt of more than £100,000 a year - many of whom seem to have had healthy pay rises or other reasons for salary increase in 2020.

      Delete
  3. I get the sense that our employers are hoping they can push through the pandemic by continuing to micromanage exhausted staff, thinking that the end of the lockdown is nigh, and also push through with excessive workloads until they fill up the gaps with new recruits. The ill effects of this on staff are evident now, and the ill (medically ill) effects of this will not evaporate. Trauma informed my arse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I get the sense that now it's "dealing with the pandemic".
      The next explanation (excuse) will be "We are dealing with the problems caused by the pandemic".
      Followed by pandemic this and pandemic that!
      How long is a piece of string?
      Undoubtedly damage caused by the pandemic will take many years to recover from, but it's also being used now as an off the shelf, mask all explanation for everything.

      'Getafix


      Delete
    2. The austerity tree was just about to blossom and its fruits would have been bountiful an plenty, but then came the pandemic and ruined all the hard work......

      Delete
    3. ... still, they'll manage to harvest the £100m required to pay all of those high-earning civil servants, the £100m to pay MPs' salaries & expenses, the £££billions to be handed over to chums AND they've signed a new contract with a flag manufacturer.

      It can't be all that bad

      Delete
    4. A modest 2 yard flag at just £150 inc vat each

      - Made from highest-quality MOD grade flag fabric.
      - Made to official Flag Institute guidelines.
      - Specifically designed and manufactured for outdoor flying
      - Hemmed on the three exposed sides with a strong double hem
      - Complete with headband, rope and toggle ready to fly


      There are 120 ministers in the uk govt

      There are about 400 ministerial agencies/depts/etc

      There are 11,930 local councils in the UK, including town, parish, community, neighbourhood and village councils.

      And there will, of course, be many other institutions, quangos or govt friendly organisations.

      Shall we say 15,000 flags to start with this year?

      "That'll be £2.25m, minister. Thank you. And we do of course encourage our valued cutomers to invest in our flag maintenance contracts; we must keep the flags in tip-top condition. Shall we say a special all-in-one price for the minister at £3m for this year's arrangements? Lovely. Thank you so much minister."

      Delete
  4. And here is the master at work:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/mar/24/no-lie-off-limits-for-boris-johnson

    Could Johnson say whether he and the chancellor had authorised the £400m bailout to OneWeb? “Er … pifflepafflewifflewaffle,” said Boris. He couldn’t possibly comment on who did what and when because … well, because he didn’t feel like it... “You haven’t actually answered any of my questions,” Jones complained, his 10 minutes of questioning having come to an end. Johnson looked delighted.


    No wonder MPs think PermSec Romeo & her team of wafflers-in-chief are doing so marvellously well in those committees.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The real failure is parliament of which these useless Select Committees are just a part.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "I am 'elite' so I can have whatever I want"

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/25/senior-army-officer-convicted-of-48000-dorset-boarding-school-fee

    A senior army officer Maj Gen Nick Welch has been found guilty of dishonestly claiming almost £50,000 in allowances to pay for his children’s boarding school fees.

    “It has been proven in this case that the retired Major General Nicholas Welch OBE did commit fraud and therefore he will be sentenced accordingly.”

    So will he lose his enhanced pension? Will he be sacked from his job as chief operating officer at Arts University Bournemouth?

    Remember the lad who was nicked for an £8,000 theft from employer? Jail, suspended for 2 years; unpaid work; rehabilitation; 3 month tag; ordered to repay the debt.

    Retired Major General Nicholas Welch OBE stole £50,000.

    Lets see if we find out how similar their sentences were

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, well, well - are you sitting comfortably?

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/nick-welch-fraud-prison-sentence-b1823011.html

      As well as his 21 month custodial sentence, which will be served in a civilian prison, Welch was told to pay the money back.

      He was also retrospectively dismissed from the armed forces, meaning he will not be able to benefit from the rank of retired major general.

      Judge Large said: “A disciplined organisation such as the army relies on those in rank and authority to set an example and to be beyond reproach.

      “The higher your rank, the more important it is that you uphold the values and standards of the army in which you serve and when an officer of the rank of major general offends as you have, the potential to erode discipline and undermine morale is considerable.

      “We have no doubt you understand that your rank of major general and role as the assistant chief of general staff are factors which aggravate the offence and require recognition in the sentence.”


      So there ARE pockets of justice & decency still operating in the UK.

      Now we just need a similarly proactive dislike of cronyism, of fraud & dishonesty to be displayed by those who run the government and, with a bit of personal discipline & moral fibre, the UK might just be a half-decent place to live.

      Delete
  7. Dear Probation staff in England

    (Wales is a slightly different issue, as is Northern Ireland; and Scotland is different again)

    In the last week or so your most senior management team, namely the Chief Exec & the Permananent Secretary, have spent a considerable amount of time telling your paymasters (Parliament) that:

    * they are closely monitoring your caseloads

    * they know your workloads might be demanding but you're all doing just fine

    * local probation leaders report caseloads are high but manageable

    * you are all very motivated & excited about the 'reunification', and

    * no-one should expect the 'reunification' to bring immediate relief because that won't happen.


    I find it extraordinary that no-one is taking the opportunity to use this blog as a means to vent their fury about the imaginary picture being painted; that no probation employee is offended by that fictional portrayal of their working life.

    I also find it beyond disappointing that your trade unions are not hitting the media with their outrage.

    The stunning silence from staff and unions alike is tacit agreement to a gross injustice being played out through the untrue words, the unfair actions & the unrealistic, abusive policies of probation providers (CRC & NPS), HMPPS & - the greatest irony of all - the Ministry of Justice.

    I have spent my life & probation career fighting for justice in all forms: justice for staff (as a union rep), justice for clients (as a probation officer), and justice for all (as a human being).

    I am, frankly, horrified at the passive acceptance of the abuse being perpetrated upon a once proud profession.

    ReplyDelete