Tuesday, 21 April 2020

Latest From Napo 209

I notice the latest Napo magazine was published online yesterday and I've selected the General Secretary's message, together with the results of the training survey. Interestingly, the latter seems to bear out messages that have been consistently voiced on here over many months.  

Ian Lawrence Writes

At the time of writing we are just ending week three since the C-19 Social Distancing policy was announced by Government. Napo members can be proud of the vital contribution they have made in maintaining vital public services across all of the 23 employers where we are represented during what is an unprecedented emergency. 

The nature of the C19 Pandemic means that the death in service of employees in any of these areas will understandably cause consternation amongst their immediate colleagues, along with the profound sense of loss and condolences that I know will be shared by all of our members. The announcement of four such losses in just over a 7 day period in late March/early April brings the scale of the danger that we are all facing into very sharp focus.

Our families and communities across the UK are showing astonishing unity in the national campaign to defeat this brutal foe. It’s also the case that some of our members have volunteered to support the NHS or are offering help to vulnerable people in their locality. It’s just as I would have expected.

Whilst it’s welcome to see the Government, the CBI and the TUC working together, there will be many of our members who hold strong views about the adequacy and timing of certain aspects of the Governments response to the impending threat back at the turn of the year. Over these last few weeks the failure to have a testing regime in place for essential international travel has been laid bare when examining the startling infection and subsequent death rates, and the decision to allow the Cheltenham Racing Festival to go ahead now looks just plain stupid. Moreover, the pitiful stories of workers struggling to secure adequate Personal Protection Equipment to care for people in Hospitals and Care Homes mean that serious questions need answering. 

Next week sees the first remotely run meeting of the TUC, and as a member of the General Council I will be adding our tribute to the astonishing bravery of all NHS workers and other employees in a range of professions who have been providing essential services in the midst of the crisis.

I will be reminding the TUC that our members in Probation (NPS and CRC) Cafcass and PB Northern Ireland, are also in that category. Thats why the Napo Officers and the HQ team have been focussing our efforts to do all that we can to help ensure that our members are afforded the necessary social distancing protections, equipment and support from your employers that you rightly demand. We are listening carefully to what you are telling us and we are keeping members up to date on what Napo is doing and what is happening across Probation and Family Courts with almost daily bulletins. We will continue to do so and members are also directed to the dedicated webpage https://www.napo.org.uk/covid-19- emergency to find out more. 

At Napo HQ itself, we are observing PHE guidelines with regard to our own staff and we are still very much there for members – contact us at info@napo. org.uk or leave a message on the voice mail. Both these points of contact are being monitored continually during the day and we will get back to members as quickly as we can. 

Hopefully it will not be too long before we some normality restored to the way in which we live and work. Meanwhile, I wanted to convey my personal best wishes to all of our members and your loved ones in these testing times.

Ian Lawrence


--oo00oo--

HUGE RESPONSE TO TRAINING SURVEY

Earlier this year Napo launched a training survey on behalf of the Training and Professional Committee. After over 200 responses Tania Bassett National Official has brought together the findings and the key themes that came out of the responses. Napo will be sharing these findings with HMPPS training to help influence training going forward for all grades of staff. 

General training and refreshers 

It is quite clear from the survey that training arrangements in the NPS and CRCs vary significantly with the majority of CRCs offering very little training to staff. Of concern one of the key issues raised by CRC members is the lack of safeguarding training. A critical subject for effective public protection, an area that many CRCs have been criticised for in HMIP reports. This was also a key area in Wales following transition and required large numbers of staff to be trained up once thy moved to the NPS. Napo will be putting pressure on CRCs to ensure that all staff are up to date with safeguarding training as a matter of urgency. 

A common theme amongst both NPS and CRC members was how training is delivered. 90% respondents said that they didn’t like online training. “It is really isolating. I would prefer training with my peers so you can discuss the issues and how it affects practice”.

Many members concurred with this view saying they would much prefer classroom based training. This enables you to ask questions of the trainer, clarify understanding and allow open discussion with colleagues. This is especially important for less experienced staff who still need to bed in the learning into their practice and who can learn a great deal from more experienced colleagues. 

Some grades such as Band 2 said they had received no training at all in the last 12 months. This was true of NPS and CRC staff in that grade. Given that a Vocational Qualifcation had been developed for administrators it is disappointing that this has not been rolled out on a regular basis. 

PQiP 

Napo received overwhelming feedback that PQiP is not fit for purpose and is too short to be comprehensive enough. Napo has already been made aware that PQiP learners and newly qualified staff do not feel confident or qualified enough to carry out the role. This is acute in the NPS where newly qualified offices are going straight into a full caseload of high and very high risk cases. PQiP trainers who responded to the survey agreed with these comments which is very worrying going forward. This is especially concerning given staff are now working at home and do not have the benefit of their experienced colleagues. With just one day of training on working with people who commit sexual offences many members have raised concerns that this is leaving staff, clients and the public at risk. Combined with an apparent lack of risk management this could seriously undermine public protection and confidence in probation. 

Again the issue of distance online learning came under criticism with a lack of university time negatively impacting on learners. It seems very clear that HMPPS need to do a complete review of the PQiP training and Napo will urge them to take these findings into consideration. One trainer told Napo that the actual training manual is now out of date. 

For some learners in the CRC we are seeing a real disconnect to how the training should be delivered and the reality. Lack of access to NPS placements and in some cases no mentoring or support will leave CRC learners at a real disadvantage. Retention will be very difficult in these areas if members feel they have been left to their own devises. Members are acutely aware of the risk of SFOs and their own vulnerability as well. 

OASys 

Since its introduction Napo members have been critical of OASys as a none user friendly and a clunky assessment. It wasn’t a surprise then to see this assessment tool come under fire in the survey. Many respondents felt that it was out of date as an assessment tool and just too long winded and repetitive. However, it was great to get some constructive feedback. Many members feel that the tool could be more useful if practitioners could update a section without having to update the whole document. This has become more of an issue since staff began working from home and an instruction was issued to review all OASys assessments. Napo agrees with members that this could easily be done if only one section could be updated to reflect the crisis rather than the entire assessment. Probation needs to modernise and a full review and investment in OASys could be a really positive move for practitioners. 

On behalf of the Training and Professional Committee Tania Bassett, National Official, and Keith Stokeld, National Vice Chair will take up these issues directly with HMPPS. The committee wants to thank members for taking time to complete the survey and we will keep you up to date on our progress.

38 comments:

  1. So Napo HQ are observing PHE guidelines with regard to their own staff, but what about PPE and closing probation offices for the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point and don't forget as soon as Napo could justify home working for themselves they told members not to contact them . Perhaps realising mortal risk is priority but not for us on the frontline as there is no mention to consult members on taking any health and safety protections . Why not? Most will realise they have no bargaining power or bility to operate as a negotiating body so they just facilitate management in order to have something to do. It is all too difficult for him and the consultation with members is more likely what was lifted from the JB blog. What a shame.

      Delete
  2. It is my experience that NAPO has lost the confidence of its membership. I have absolutely no idea of what their role is, as a union they have been in active in bringing about any changes.I get the impression which I hope I am wrong that they are allied with management in keeping the membership disillusioned with false hopes and creating image that things are happening when in fact jack shit is happening.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If a Napo is led by its members, then why is Napo safe and at home (“observing PHE guidelines”) while the us members are unsafe and at work in probation offices where PHE guidelines are not being observed?

    Even the @NPsBirmingham Bronze Commander is at home and they believe they have superpowers !!

    https://mobile.twitter.com/NpsBirmingham/status/1247944198633984001

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The only thing I’ll miss from this awful crisis is the un-probation title Bronze Commander. Figuring whether I’m more DC or Marvel helps me drop off at night."

      Delete
  4. Napo would hardly distinguish itself or have any authority to call out probation employers by failing as an employer to take all possible steps to protect its staff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The endless criticism of Napo is sapping. There are those out there who seem to believe that TR was invented and implimented by Napo. Oh for a Union with that much power.

      Delete
    2. You're right. NAPO neither invented TR or implemented TR.
      But their fight against TR and its implementation was minimal and piss poor.
      Why? Because their biggest concern at the time was to prevent their dirty washing being aired in public.
      If people feel that the union to pay into to support them are not representing their interests they're entitled to express their opinion.
      With so much criticism being leveled at the executive there's obviously a problem.
      But it's a problem for the executive to address not the membership.

      Delete
    3. They were 100% complicit in the implementation of TR.

      1. They engaged with the 'sifting' & signed off on the MoJ arrangements which had significant job losses embedded within the bidders' contracts - figures which were discussed well before Grayling handed out those contracts.

      2. They signed off on the staff transfer agreements & VR which were only useful to Trust HQ staff being made redundant, many of whom had already secured new jobs with the CRCs so were twice rewarded, i.e. full VR and a new job to walk into.

      3. Frontline operational staff - POs, PSOs, case admin, reception, CSOs - were doubly shafted: once with the "7 month no redundancy" clause, and secondly by the new CR owners who refused to honour the nationally agreed VR arrangements.

      4. The MoJ recognised that agreement WAS valid because they handed the CRCs the money to pay staff off (some £80m from the Cabinet Office Modernisation Fund), but they allowed the CRCs to play fast-&-loose with the rules, pocket the majority of the staff payments & hand out a fraction of the severance pay.

      5. Having signed off on job losses & giving members' hard won redundancy payments to the employers, Napo did & said fuck all bar a few local pockets of resistance that were crushed because they weren't nationally supported .

      So no, they didn't 'invent' TR but yes, they helped implement it.

      And there are so many other things that ***haven't*** happened since 2010 & Ledger-gate. Members have been sidelined from the point at which Ledger resigned, up to & beyond the tribunal for sexual harassment of staff, the union's handsome cash payout to the guilty man, TR & beyond.

      So the endless criticism may be sapping, but its been justified and necessary. Without local activists taking risks and taking action - and also taking HQ to task in a tribunal - nothing would have happened in the interests of members.

      But the paid Napo crew haven't done so bad...

      Delete
    4. That is so true your an insightful genius or you have some great sources. Well done.

      Delete
  5. The problem with oasys is simple, if link to RoSH is identified a new box should open up asking for analysis (what is risk, who to etc and how this will be managed in the RMP, if a link to OB is identified a new box should open up asking what sentence plan objective will address this. There should be a tick box in all sections asking if SU identified any problems in that area in their SAQ and if so how that will be addressed. Child concerns should be triggered in relationship section with child details, CSC involvement etc being entered there. Delete everything after section 13 as it should already be covered.System then populates RMP and ISP which it automatically sends to nDelius for easy access. Should also generate all nDelius flags. Would require deeper analysis on section 2 to identify previous offences linked to on going RoSH which would prompt in relevant sections as you complete them. Would massively reduce time to complete and ensure nothing gets missed / lost. Just a thought x

    ReplyDelete
  6. It depends whether OASys is primarily a risk assessment, or a client assessment. If the latter, it is not fit for purpose, as it flies in the face of strength-based work: it identifies a problem and then requires you to plan around the problem
    Also if we are getting into thinking of improvments to our databases and IT... when I write an email regardign a case, I want to hit a button and have that automatically recorded in teh case file eg delius. When I write an ARMS I want to hit a button and have the relevant sections transferred from existing analysis, eg OASys. When I make a referral to antother agency, I want a standard form which again would populate at the hit of a button. And when I am instructed to repetititively cut and paste information from one place to another by my employer, I want to throw something at a wall and flounce out of the office

    ReplyDelete
  7. weird coronavirus fact - currently in the US, a 2 litre bottle of cocoa-cola is more expensive than a barrel of crude oil.

    Now that's what I call capitalism!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Going by the news this morning, I reckoned if I took my car for a fill up, they should be paying me

      Delete
  8. More from NPSBirmingham https://twitter.com/NpsBirmingham/status/1252586673227128835

    "Good natured, caring Probation Head compliments management team member’s decor in new house. Takes him another 10 minutes to twig that entire team have set their Microsoft Teams backdrop to same ‘Ideal Homes Show’ setting."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Presumably Buckland, Farrar or Rees either (a) don't read this blog or (b) don't care that one of their senior NPS staff is a totally insensitive cockwomble.

      Delete
    2. Oh how we laughed & laughed until it was time to log into our online banking to make sure the bonus had landed (rubs hands, smiley face, bottle of champagne, ninety-nine-change hands).

      Delete
    3. If there's bronze commanders there must be silver and gold ones aswell. Maybe even platinum ones.
      Where are they?

      Delete
    4. Wow, decor. Because that’s what matters in a pandemic!!

      Delete
  9. A shipment of vital protective equipment from Turkey for NHS staff had not been formally secured when the government announced on Saturday that it would arrive the next day, The Times has learnt.

    Last night it was still unclear when the consignment would reach the UK, as NHS chiefs reported that hospitals were re-using disposable gowns up to three times after stocks ran worryingly low. UK businesses said they were making ad hoc deals to supply local hospitals as they failed to get a government response on offers to help the national supply chain, or clear guidance as to what was needed.

    At the same time British companies are still shipping millions of pieces of personal protective equipment to Germany, Italy and Spain despite the...... Paywall

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/read-this/why-ppe-turkey-has-been-delayed-and-when-emergency-equipment-will-arrive-uk-2545231

      Why has PPE from Turkey been delayed?

      The government has blamed ‘challenges at the Turkish end’ for the delay in the delivery of PPE supplies, after the life-saving equipment failed to arrive in the UK on Sunday (19 Apr) evening.

      RAF planes were instead tasked with going to collect it, with the first of three flights finally leaving from RAF Brize Norton on Monday (20 Apr) to start the collection.

      Downing Street was unable to say when the plane would return to the UK, with 84 tonnes of life-saving medical clothing and equipment, including 400,000 protective gowns for the NHS, made by Turkish suppliers.

      The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "We're continuing to work to ensure that this shipment is delivered as soon as it is ready.

      "As you know, we are seeking to source PPE from a number of countries and yesterday, for example, 140,000 gowns arrived from Burma."

      The spokesman said it was a commercial order from a Turkish company which was made last Thursday.

      Asked what the hold-up was, the spokesman said: "I don't have the details of the reason for the delay. As I say, we want it to be resolved as quickly as possible and the RAF is able to then bring the cargo back to the UK."

      Delete
    2. Ref the PPE issue and a comment yesterday about why prisoners aren't making scrubs, my sister tells me today there has been an announcement in her local press that hospital gowns are now being made at Guys Marsh.

      Delete
  10. This government and during this national emergency knows no bounds in telling any number of lies in order to 'wing it'. Today a senior civil servant confirmed that there was no 'lost' email regarding the European contract for ventilators - it was a 'political' decision not to join in - his exact words. Should be no surprise as we all knew the Tories and especially Boris Johnson simply do not regard the truth as important - only winning and getting into power is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/21/philip-pullman-ministers-should-face-charges-if-brexit-politics-slowed-ppe

      Delete
  11. gets better JB: "Matt Hancock rejects senior official's 'political decision' claim on EU procurement scheme"

    And hancock now reckons the EU procurement project "hasn't delivered a single piece of PPE"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18395204.matt-hancock-uk-agreed-take-part-eu-ppe-scheme-far-no-equipment-delivered/

      When Tom Tugendhat, the committee Chairman, asked Sir Simon whether it had been a political decision by ministers, he replied: "It was a political decision."

      British officials at the UK Mission to the EU in Brussels "briefed ministers about what was available, what was on offer, and the decision is no," explained Sir Simon.

      As a political row took off, on March 26, Downing Street claimed there had been a "mix-up," which had meant emails from the EU about the procurement scheme were not received.

      Mr Hancock explained: "The invitation when it came in to the Department for Health - and I know there has been debate about whether it was sent to the wrong email address initially - to participate in this scheme in an associate way, because we are not members of the EU, came to me for decision and I said: yes.”

      He went on: “But, having said that, as far as I'm aware this scheme has not yet delivered any PPE."

      Delete
    2. Its like a game of "who told which lie when", but a multi-dimensional version involving the added dimensions of time & space.

      "er, er, er, er, er, errrr... dunno! Your turn."

      Delete
  12. COVID-19 BULLETIN 13 – 21-04-2020 (Minus Cafcass)

    NPS Updates

    Working at Home allowance

    As previously reported we have raised the issue of an allowance being paid to members for the additional costs associated with working at home such as power, broadband and other utilities. HMRC rules say that the maximum that can be claimed tax free and without evidence is £6 per week (£4 per week for the previous tax year). This can be paid by the employer or individuals can submit a self-assessment tax return and claim tax relief. The Civil Service position currently is that the self- assessment process should be followed. We find this unacceptable as the money is coming from the same place and the process is cumbersome and complex. To make a claim for the current tax year involves waiting until April 2021 or later for reimbursement of costs being incurred now. We have put this to the employer and are waiting for a response. Our advice to members is not to take any action now but wait for further advice from us.

    Extended ROTL / early release scheme

    This was suspended on Friday following some people being released too early. This was described as “human error” and all involved returned to prison when contacted. Work has been done on the administration of the scheme and ROTLs are expected to resume imminently. It is clear that the rate of release on this scheme has been much slower than anticipated and we will continue to monitor this.

    PPE and workplace safety

    Our demands about non-AP workplaces have been agreed by HMPPS and NPS Silver Commands (Divisional Directors) have been reminded that if there are non-AP workplaces (or parts of workplaces) where social distancing cannot be achieved they must not be used. Where social distancing in a workplace relies on certain conditions (such as a max number of staff) these conditions must be met at all times. For APs there may be some duties which mean social distancing cannot be maintained and PPE must be used. There is an audit specifically looking at AP building to check if capacity needs to be reduced or other measures taken to maintain social distancing. There has been another revised version of the guidance on PPE and hygiene to incorporate our demand that PPE is not limited in APs based on having a resident with symptoms as many can have and transmit the virus without symptoms.

    SPOs in prisons

    The OMiC EDM has been misinterpreted in some areas. The SPOs working in some prisons were wrongly being told they had to be on site at all times. It has been clarified this is incorrect, the fundamental principle applies to all – if work can be done at home it should be. The EDM does however say that SPOs will remain allocated to the OMiC work rather than being redeployed to the community.

    Parole reports

    Guidance is due to be issued on parole reports to prioritise those where a hearing is likely in the shorter term. This follows our representations that members are being put under enormous and unnecessary pressure to prepare parole reports in cases where a hearing is not imminent and where proper preparation cannot be done at this time. Our position is that given the circumstances the arbitrary deadlines have no meaning and reports should only be prepared when there is a hearing likely to happen in coming weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MEETING WITH NEW SHADOW MINISTER FOR PROBATION AND PRISONS

      Soon after last week’s meeting with Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy, came an opportunity for the General Secretary and National Chair to spend an hour of lively video time with Lyn Brown MP for West Ham who has been appointed as the Shadow Minister for Probation and Prisons.

      Lyn previously held the working brief for the Labour Party on the Police and Fire Services, and it did not take long to understand that Lyn is no stranger to directing uncomfortable questions and has a reputation for speaking truth to power! Lyn will be working closely with Napo and our Parliamentary Consultants over the coming months and welcomes the opportunity to meet with as many members from the NPS and CRC as possible as she sets about a testing fact finding mission. We are sure that many members will be pleased to assist Lyn wherever possible and we look forward to productive working relationship with the new Shadow Minister.

      The Shadow Secretary has since recorded a message to the ‘hidden heroes’ of the C-19 pandemic – paying tribute to “those working in our prisons, in our IRCs, those working with those in Youth Custody and in Probation settings.” The message in full can be found on the Napo website.

      Delete
    2. “If there are non-AP workplaces (or parts of workplaces) where social distancing cannot be achieved they must not be used.“

      So that’s 99.9% of probation offices.

      Delete
    3. “The Shadow Secretary has since recorded a message to the ‘hidden heroes’ of the C-19 pandemic“

      Keep the recorded message. Give us our pay rise instead !!

      Delete
    4. Being reimbursed for working from home? If the HMRC guidance is £6 a week, are people not already saving much more than this in what they would ordinarily spend on travelling to work?

      Delete
  13. Cronyism:

    The Kent, Surrey and Sussex CRC parent company (Seetec) has recently announced the appointment of Ian Poree as Seetec CEO.

    Ian Poree’s previous roles include: Director, Transforming Rehabilitation Programme, Ministry of Justice (where he helped slice, dice and destroy the probation service).

    Nb. They are now trying to disguise the Transforming Rehabilitation programme as the ‘Rehabilitation‘ programme !!

    https://www.seetec.co.uk/insights/seetec-group-appoints-new-chief-executive-officer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Revolving Door syndrome

      Delete
    2. Seetec might have been ok in the long run then this happened. Oh dear!

      Delete
  14. 10:57 amazing stuff. Truly impressed by your knowledge. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anyone yet been invited / instructed to take the test?

    Exclusive: NHS using ‘flawed’ COVID-19 test – missing 25% of positives

    Hancock under pressure to resign as leaked documents show NHS is using knowingly flawed tests for coronavirus

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/exclusive-nhs-using-flawed-covid-19-test-missing-25-of-positives/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NHS laboratories are using a flawed test for coronavirus, according to a leaked Public Health England document seen by openDemocracy. Experts warn that the test fails to detect up to 25% of positive COVID-19 results.

      Although the current test is known to be inconsistent, NHS labs are nonetheless being advised to continue using it, while an urgent “migration” or shift to a commercially available test takes place.

      The leaked document from the National Infection Service (NIS) will put intense pressure on Health Secretary Matt Hancock to explain why the NHS has been using knowingly flawed tests for many weeks, as national death rates have spiralled.

      Hancock – who promised 100,000 tests a week by the end of April – recently said that “no test is better than a bad test”. Yet the documents reveal that senior government advisers have known for some weeks that the UK’s critical coronavirus test was not entirely reliable.

      Among the leading scientists who have seen the NIS document, the reaction has been one of outrage. One said: “There should be mass resignations, both at the top of PHE and in the government. We should expect better.”

      Jon Ashworth, Labour's Shadow Health Secretary, said: “Ministers boasted we were world leading in developing this test back in January. If there have been concerns about its accuracy, senior figures have a duty to be clear and transparent with the public. Given the Secretary of State has promised 100,000 tests a day by the end of the month we now need total clarity on what these tests are and who will be processing them."

      Throughout the pandemic, the government has regularly stated that at “all times” medical and scientific advice has been followed, and that the “right thing has been done at the right time.”

      Despite two months of reviewing the key test used in the UK to detect the virus – officially known as the ‘PHE SARS-CoV-2RdRp assay’ – no minister, leading scientific or medical adviser has publicly acknowledged that the test is not fully reliable.

      Although a numerical evaluation of the test’s reliability is not included in the NIS document, openDemocracy has learned from a leading pathologist with knowledge of the NIS’s ongoing review that the test misses 25 percent of positive cases.

      That, according to one leading epidemiologist, is a “catastrophe”. It means that those given a virus-free status in error since testing first began two months ago would not have known they were infected.

      As such, they would have continued spreading the disease among their close family and – if they continued going to work or not practising social distancing – among the wider community.

      Delete