Tuesday, 28 April 2020

Government Fails the NHS

Last night the BBC and the Panorama team did their job in calling-out the government over it's scandalous failure to provide adequate PPE for NHS and social care staff. This forensic examination of the issue cuts right through all the government news manipulation bullshit about logistics and gets to something approaching the truth of the matter and the tragedy of so many front-line staff dying through want of proper protection.

As with so much in politics and especially associated with successive Tory government's who of course really deep down despise the NHS, it's all a ghastly game a la Cummings-style of narrative manipulation. The Thursday national clap-along for the NHS, so cynically encouraged by the very same government, helps divert attention from their negligence whilst serving to highlight individual heroic martyrdom. I find it obscenely grotesque, particularly when we know at the same time there are continuing back-door attempts to push blame on to the NHS in a variety of ways ranging from lack of preparedness to wasteful PPE use.  

The virus is horrid enough, but I find the developing political shenanigans over the blame game is very likely to be every bit as ghastly because it could and should bring down a government if any of them had a shred of decency between them. But they are Tories and haven't, especially where the NHS is concerned and therefore all decent-minded folk must be alert and prepared to protect our NHS over the coming months from what will be further insidious attacks. Do not be fooled and succumb to the temptation to believe the leopard has changed its spots and a now-grateful and humbled Covid-recovered prime minister has seen the light and our wonderful health service is safe in his hands.  

This from the BBC website, but if you haven't already, watch the Panorama programme and be prepared to be truly shocked at our duplicitous government:-   

Coronavirus: UK failed to stockpile crucial PPE

The government failed to buy crucial protective equipment to cope with a pandemic, a BBC investigation has found. There were no gowns, visors, swabs or body bags in the government's pandemic stockpile when Covid-19 reached the UK. NHS staff say they are being put at risk because of the shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE).

The government said it has taken the right steps and is doing everything it can to increase stocks.

The investigation by BBC Panorama found that vital items were left out of the stockpile when it was set up in 2009 and that the government subsequently ignored a warning from its own advisers to buy missing equipment. The expert committee that advises the government on pandemics, the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag), recommended the purchase of gowns last June. Gowns are currently one of the items in shortest supply in the UK and they are now difficult to source because of the global shortage of PPE.

Doctors and nurses have complained that there are also shortages of the life-saving FFP3 respirator masks. Panorama has discovered that millions of FFP3 respirator masks are unaccounted for. There were 33 million on the original 2009 procurement list for the stockpile, but only 12 million have been handed out. The government refuses to explain where the other masks have gone. A government spokesperson said there was "limited demand" for the masks coming through the Supply Disruption Line, "which is one reason why they haven't all been distributed". They added that gowns were a recent recommendation from the advisory group and would be procured for the "future stockpile build up alongside all other necessary equipment".

Panorama has spoken to a number of NHS insiders about PPE who wish to remain anonymous. "There is a complete lack of transparency from the government. They are creating panic, as we don't know if they can supply us so we are scrambling to get it elsewhere," a head of procurement told the programme. The government also failed to stockpile visors, the swabs needed for testing and the body bags needed for the dead.

Professor John Ashton, a public health expert and long-standing critic of the government, told the programme the lack of preparation was breathtaking. "The consequence of not planning; not ordering kit; not having stockpiles is that we are sending into the front line doctors, nurses, other health workers and social care workers without the equipment to keep them safe," he said.

A government spokesperson said the stockpile was designed for a flu pandemic and that Covid-19 is a different disease with a higher hospitalisation rate. They said swabs and body bags were not recommended by Nervtag historically, but eye protection was, so the stockpile contains safety glasses.

Panorama also investigated changes to the government guidance on what PPE NHS staff should wear. In January this year, Covid-19 was officially designated a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID). The decision was made in consultation with a group of British experts. A Health and Safety Executive evaluation of PPE published in 2019 had already recommended that all healthcare workers should wear a gown, FFP3 respirator mask and visor when dealing with HCIDs. Those recommendations were in line with existing UK guidance.

But on 13 March this year, the government downgraded its guidance on PPE and told NHS staff they were safe to wear less protective aprons and basic surgical masks in all but the most high risk circumstances. Panorama understands that on the same day, the government took steps to remove Covid-19 from the list of HCIDs. But the experts who had recommended the coronavirus be put on the list in the first place were not consulted. Instead, the government asked its Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP).

Panorama has discovered that the ACDP was only asked to consider the matter on the morning of its 13 March meeting. It was added to the committee's agenda under "any other business". The committee backed the decision to remove Covid-19 from the HCID list, but sources on that committee have told Panorama that it had to be, in part, a pragmatic decision based on the availability of PPE. It was another six days before Public Health England announced that the coronavirus was no longer considered an HCID.

A government spokesperson said Covid-19 was taken off the list because it has a low overall mortality rate and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific laboratory test for the virus. They added the committee's advice that Covid-19 no longer be considered an HCID was based entirely on scientific considerations. "The HCID classification is used for serious infections where there are limited numbers of cases requiring specialist input and facilities," the spokesperson said.

"This is an unprecedented global pandemic and we have taken the right steps at the right time to combat it, guided at all times by the best scientific advice. The government has been working day and night to battle against coronavirus, delivering a strategy designed at all times to protect our NHS and save lives."

You can watch the full Panorama programme, Has the Government Failed the NHS? on iPlayer here.

30 comments:

  1. Probation workers and many other keyworkers have also been working on the frontline. They were also failed by the government.

    Will the families of the numerous dead probation workers be getting £60,000 too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hancock said at the briefing that they would review eligibility for other keyworkers.

      Presumably that eligibility could include teachers, shop workers, delivery drivers, emergency services, prison & probation staff, bus drivers, military personnel, refuse collectors...?

      Delete
    2. Where is the failure from the UK government? Had China followed the correct protocols and alerted the WHO instead of stock pilling the worlds PPE, many lives would be saved. The Chinese government are to blame in a this. Not the UK. Boris has been leading from the front in labs working on finding a cure whilst some part of the lamestreat media have you believe he's been at home taking it easy! This is not the case.

      Delete
    3. Anon 09:46 Ok I'll leave your contribution on as I know it's a view held by some, along with those who believe Donald Trump is wonderful, the tooth fairy exists and the earth is flat, but we're not going to have a troll fest.

      Delete
    4. A newspaper has been accused of mis-reporting a poll on the public attitudes towards the coronavirus lockdown in a bid to support the government agenda.

      The latest edition of the Telegraph reports on polling by Opinium, just as Boris Johnson returns to Downing Street, to claim that the public are becoming “increasingly supportive” of a “staggered exit from the lockdown”, which appears to be the government’s vision.

      As the newspaper reveals Boris Johnson could ease the coronavirus lockdown before May 7th, it reports that “more than half of people wanting restaurants, offices, shopping centres and schools to reopen as soon as new infections decrease”.

      It adds that a “majority want sports stadiums to remain closed until there is a vaccine”.

      But it fails to point out that support for easing measures comes with conditions, with Opinium finding that just 14% want to see restaurants reopen “once cases go down”, 24% for offices, 18% for shopping centres and 33% for schools.

      It is only with further monitoring and restrictions do the public get on board with proposals.

      “This is not an accurate reflection of the Opinium Research polling,” said Will Jennings, a politics professor at the University of Southampton. “Over half of people support reopening ‘with monitoring and restrictions’, not ‘as soon as new infections decrease’.”

      “This is factually mis-reporting the poll,” wrote Sunder Katwala, the director of British Future. “Especially as poll respondents were given a “when cases drop” option - so its clear a majority *didn’t* back it “as soon as” cases drop, without further conditions.”

      Peter Geoghegan tweeted: “This looks like some very, very questionable polling reporting by the Telegraph. Poll numbers don’t seem to back up paper’s claim that ‘more than half of people wanting restaurants, offices, shopping centres and schools to reopen *as soon as* new infections decrease’”.

      Separate polling from Deltapoll and Sky News showed that the public are cautious about measures being lifted too quickly.

      Deltapoll found the public feared the government will move too quickly to lift restrictions with 63% agreeing, compared to 21% believing they are moving too slowly.

      A poll from Sky found an overwhelming majority support the government prioritising health over the economy across all age groups.

      “It must be a real shame for the government to find that most Brits are quite happy to stay in semi-lockdown until it’s safe to end it, rather than agitating to sacrifice our lives and our friends’ and families’ lives for the sake of the economy,” noted Twitter user @stevieinselby.

      Last year the Telegraph was accused of misrepresenting a poll on proroguing parliament and was criticised by pollsters for claiming a majority of support for a no-deal Brexit.

      Delete
    5. 946 Boris coward pomp buffoon mouthy nonsense from the clown king. Kept Britain open. Claimed crowds won't spread it and the gold cup and footie went on. Schools remained open. That Berk has had full pay sick leave and guilded gold star treatment through NHS service . The real plan was sack the NHS. All based on money for Tory privateers in crap contracts. Defend the populist Tory plan b because they have no real capable leaders . Their pack are relived to him back from languishing in chequers because the couldn't make a cup of tea than a country decision. Are home deaths secreted figures massaged get real the Tories have loused this up and knew how not to. The truth and figures will come out I hope survive to see it so should you.

      Delete
  2. Guardian: "Hancock said that 82 NHS workers and 16 social care staff have died during the pandemic. A Guardian count has recorded 119 deaths of health professionals while Nursing Notes, a platform run by nurses for others in the profession, has found that at least 134 health and care workers have died of coronavirus."

    134 x £60,000 = £8m

    That's a teeny-wee fraction of what it will cost them if they admit they were wrong & get sued.

    This is damage limitation blood money, NOT "a deep personal sense of duty to care for their relatives."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure if it's universal or specific to particular NHS Trusts, but I do know that at least some frontline NHS workers received an e-mail this week saying they were now going to be tested on a weekly basis.
    However, it's been met with some suspicion that it has more to do with achieving the Governments promise of 100,000 tests a day by the end of the month.
    Yesterdays daily testing figures were around 34,000, which means that figure must increase by over 60,000 by Thursday this week to realise that promise.
    It's also true that the number of tests is not representative of the number of people being tested as one person can be tested several times.
    I wonder how much closer we will be to the 100,000 daily tests promised when the daily Covid19 update is delivered on Thursday afternoon. Will the increase be just too big to believe?
    I note too that the son of Mr. Choudhary, a Urologist that died from Coronavirus has called on Matt Hancock to give a public apology for the way Government have responded to the virus outbreak.
    I'm quite touched by the way the request has been made with great dignity without trying to attribute blame.
    I think the Government should give his request some serious consideration as it makes perfect sense, as more then any other time in recent history it's extremely important that the Government can demonstrate it can be trusted by the nation.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-52453520

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The son of an NHS doctor who died with coronavirus has called on Health Secretary Matt Hancock to say sorry for mistakes in the government's response.

      Intisar Chowdhury, 18, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme a public apology would help improve public trust. Intisar's father Dr Abdul Mabud Chowdhury, 53, warned about a lack of protection before he died.

      Mr Hancock later told LBC that listening to front-line staff would help the government improve. He added that he did not want to "play down" the efforts of those working to get personal protective equipment (PPE) to the front line. Mr Hancock said: "A huge amount of people are doing everything they can and have done since the start of this crisis. I don't want to play down the enormous efforts of many thousands of people who are working every hour that there is to try to solve the problem."

      Speaking directly to the health secretary on an LBC phone-in on Tuesday, Intisar said: "The public is not expecting the government to handle this perfectly. We just want you to openly acknowledge there have been mistakes in handling this virus. Openly acknowledging a mistake is not an admission of guilt, it is genuinely just making you seem more human. So can you please do that for me at the press conference today - make the public apology?"

      Mr Hancock responded: "It is very important that we are constantly learning about how to do things better and I think listening to the voices on the front line will be a very important part of how we improve."

      Intisar had earlier told BBC Radio 4's Today programme earlier that ministers should consider giving families a private apology at some point in the future, but that a public apology now would help improve public trust.

      "I definitely do want a public apology because I feel like the government's response in not only handling the PPE crisis but the whole virus in itself wasn't the best," he said. "I think we can forgive that as a country because it is such an unprecedented thing it is hard to know what to do. But they need to hold themselves accountable for that, learn from that and move on so that we can trust them more."

      Dr Chowdhury, a consultant urologist, died at Queen's Hospital in Romford, east London, earlier this month.

      At least 82 NHS staff and 16 care workers who were confirmed to have died in hospital in England, according to official figures. A separate BBC News analysis of published figures found that at least 114 health workers have died with the virus across the UK. It is not known where they contracted Covid-19.

      Mr Chowdhury's appeal comes after a BBC Panorama investigation found the government failed to buy crucial PPE to cope with a pandemic. There were no gowns, visors, swabs or body bags in the government's pandemic stockpile when Covid-19 reached the UK, the programme found.

      Delete
  4. Statistics

    18 April 2020 - 15,464 recorded deaths in UK hospitals

    ONS stats released today show that on 19 April 2020 the number of deaths in the UK "involving COVID-19, all ages" was 20,909

    So if we add 5,500+ to the current UK figure 21,092 it puts the UK death toll somewhere between 26,500 & 27,000.

    The Tory fuckers & their weasly enablers have kept that pretty fucking quiet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Important Correction - fat fingers, wrong keys

      The ONS stats were for 17 April 2020
      _____________________________________________

      It represents a 35% increase in the 'official' hospital death figures published daily.

      So apply that percentage to 21,092 and we get:

      almost 28,500 deaths in the UK to date.

      Italy is around 27,000; Spain around 24,000

      The lies & spin are scandalous beyond words.

      Delete
    2. I posted the above and I'll offer my own public apology that I cannot be as gracious as Intisar Chowdhury.

      The fuckers are lying through their smarmy grinning teeth, they're misleading us, they're listening to shitweasels like Cummings & his gang of digital pickpockets - they're quite literally killing us with their incompetence.

      Delete
    3. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/04/28/uk/uk-death-toll-statistics-ons-gbr-intl/index.html

      Delete
    4. Headline from Telegraph...

      PPE: Government counted each glove as single item to reach one billion total, investigation shows

      FFS! There's spin and there's spin.

      Delete
    5. 13:16 etc here again:

      UK ONS figures for "UK deaths involving COVID-19, all ages" are for the weeks of 13, 20, & 27 March plus 3, 10 & 17 Apr respectively:

      (5 + 113 + 607 + 3,801 + 6,887 + 9,496) = 20,909 total COVID-19 deaths as at 17 April 2020, as compared to the 'hospitals only' figure of 14,451.

      The 22,351 figure is ALL deaths in the week ending 17 April 2020. Of *that* figure, 9,496 were COVID-19 related.

      The difference between 22,351 & 14,451 is a nonsense figure that has no value.

      The MEANINGFUL figure is the difference between 20,909 & 14,451, i.e. 6,458; meaning the hospital-only figure is 44% shy of the actual COVID-19 toll.

      Earlier I'd used the figure of 15,464 which was released on 18 April, believing that was a more accurate reflection as it was the data as at 5pm on 17 April.

      Enough waffle.

      Thought it might help.

      Sorry.

      Delete
    6. Here's the ONS link

      https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

      Delete
    7. The post at 18:16 was in response to the CNN story listed at 17:37.

      Sorry.

      Delete
    8. BBC says "UK hospital death toll now 21,678, a rise of 586 on the previous day"

      If what anon@13:16 above suggests is right then the true number must be at least 35% higher, 29,265.

      That's almost 30,000 dead.

      THIRTY THOUSAND.

      Since March 2020.

      The indignant, smug I'm-not-apologising-to-anyone-what-a-cock Hancock needs to set his record straight.

      Even the 'scientific data charts' they used were presented so as NOT to state what the true figures are.

      Delete
  5. VIA Facebook and the Ministry of Justice

    "Essential workers can now go online to book a test for themselves and anyone in their household if one of them has #coronavirus symptoms 📲🖥️

    Don’t delay – tests are most effective within 3 days of symptoms."



    https://www.facebook.com/ministryofjusticeuk/photos/a.411429492282114/2935784766513228/?type=3&theater

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every now and then we are bound to attract people who deliberately set out to test our patience - so I'll just carry on deleting any comment that I feel is crass. We've had the Boris is great contribution and in the absence of any further expansion on that dubious hypothesis, the discussion is closed.

      Delete
  7. Hi Jim,

    Great blog today thank you. To address 18.45, I’m the parent of a doctor in a Covid Team (larger hospitals have split their A and E Depts into Covid and Non Covid).

    I have never felt so angry about a Government as I do to this one. TR pushed me hard but the sheer failure at all levels at this time compounded by an attitude that whatever they say at any given time is truth when it blatantly isn’t, stuns me. In the past week I’ve heard directly of gloves running out followed by gowns and then this morning coming off a twelve hour night shift it was masks. I know the truth of the doctor who told me this.

    We have been so let down by Boris and his so called government, building upon the wanton destruction of the public sector and lack of strategic planning by its predecessor Tory governments, that this country will end up with the highest death rate in Europe from Covid 19.

    PO

    ReplyDelete
  8. From Dominic Minghella blog:-

    “Apparent success”? What was Johnson thinking?

    “The boss”, as his sycophant colleagues insist on calling him, is back. Like a caped crusader, recovered from a brush with kryptonite. Physically weakened, perhaps, but with new, heroic resolve. Good old-fashioned grit and guts.

    But many found Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Downing Street back-to-work address nauseating. Not least because he made almost no mention of the astonishing suffering and loss of life, or the cloud of grief descending upon our land, talking instead of the UK’s “apparent success” in combating the “invisible mugger” that is Coronavirus.

    How does a man who has presided over – and indeed, thanks to those fateful, shameful eleven days in March, provoked – the calamity of our lifetimes, dare to stand in front of us and talk of “success”? With the UK on course to have one of the worst per capita death tolls in the world; with 45,000 or so lives already lost; with families grieving up and down the country and unable even to attend funerals; with 5,000 new cases a week, what on earth was he thinking?

    The answer is there in plain sight – in his relentless insistence on “protecting the NHS”. (Rich, I know, coming from the Tories who have choked the NHS for a decade, frozen nurses’ pay, demonized its European staff, and who even now fail it on a daily basis with their incapacity even to deliver basic equipment – and yet they have the temerity to clap on Thursdays and call it “our NHS” … but bear with me. The sheer unlikelihood of the Tories suddenly falling in love with state provision is the clue to Johnson’s evident satisfaction with the current state of affairs.)

    Remember Johnson’s “powered by love” speech on coming out of hospital?

    “We are making progress in this national battle because the British public formed a human shield around this country’s greatest national asset: our National Health Service.” (12 April 2020)

    Note, too, how we are exhorted, daily, not to stay at home and save lives, but to stay at home, protect the NHS and save lives.

    This notion of us protecting the NHS is the wrong way round of course. Notwithstanding our duty – shamefully neglected – to protect its staff, the NHS is there to protect us. That’s its purpose. Our “greatest national asset” is not the NHS, it is us, the people. The clue is in the name: the National Health Service. It’s a service. Our service. To protect us. But Johnson congratulates us for forming a human shield around it, as if actual people could be worth sacrificing to protect it.

    Of course, the NHS can only protect us if we don’t overwhelm it. There’s no doubt that we have all had to play our part in flattening the curve, otherwise the NHS wouldn’t have been able to cope. Flattening the curve has meant we’ve delivered patients at a steadier pace, and nurses like Johnson’s Jenny and Luis have, just, been able to manage. Fewer people will have died than would have been the case if the patients had all come in one big wave. We get that. We know why we’ve stayed at home.

    But time and again, Johnson’s language reveals that his priority is to be able to say that the NHS has coped, no matter how many people have died. When he describes the NHS as “the beating heart of this country”, he seems to forget the actual beating hearts. Or indeed the ones which have stopped beating.

    “We will win because our NHS is the beating heart of this country… It is unconquerable.” (12 April 2020)

    ReplyDelete
  9. This warped love for the NHS makes sense if his greatest fear has not, in fact, been the tens of thousands of deaths from coronavirus. It makes sense if, on the contrary, his greatest fear has been the dire imagery of an NHS in collapse. Large numbers of patients dying unattended in corridors, or in ambulances queueing outside. Medics despairing. Emergency services unable to respond. All manner of collateral chaos. The inevitable media reports would be beyond his control, and his premiership would likely be over. The images would endure for generations.

    That collapse has, somehow, and mercifully, been avoided. The unfolding care home disaster, which has involved the exporting of demise to disparate locations, far from the hospital front lines, may be part of the explanation. And shattered, lethally under-equipped NHS staff might say that calamity has been far closer than the public realises. Certainly the families of those staff who have lost their lives will take little comfort in the idea of the NHS having been spared complete collapse. Their worlds have been destroyed. The same goes for the families of all of the 45,000 victims. There is no consolation.

    But for Johnson, the difference between near-breakdown and total breakdown is all the difference in the world. The optics of a visibly collapsed NHS would likely have been terminal. An ocean of kryptonite from which there was no heroic return. The unconquerable would have been conquered. But the invisible deaths of coronavirus, in which loved ones disappear into an ambulance never to be seen again, seem not, yet, to be damaging him.

    No wonder, then, that in his back-to-work address, he saw no problem in stepping over the dead, and talking instead about our “progress” and our “apparent success”. Because, from where he’s standing, a vital mission has indeed been accomplished. The mission, at all costs, to prevent the NHS from appearing to be in meltdown. The mission to stay in office.

    “We defied so many predictions. We did not run out of ventilators or ICU beds. We did not allow our NHS to collapse.” (27 April 2020)

    Johnson’s Tories have not suddenly fallen in love with state health care. They don’t profess to love the NHS because it saves us. They love it because, for as long as it appears to be coping, however narrowly, with a virus they pretty much invited into the country with open arms, the NHS saves them.

    “… if we could stop our NHS from being overwhelmed, then we could not be beaten… ” (12 April 2020)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great observations.
      I think there's no doubt that post pandemic, and when we've left the EU, and great chunks of the NHS continue to be contracted out to the private sector, that same mantra will remain.
      "We're doing it because it's the best way to protect our NHS".

      And if they really want to say thank you to those NHS workers on the front line they could perhaps think about squashing some (or all) of the huge debts they've racked up at university and the extortionate interest rates being applied to those debts?
      Just a thought Boris!

      'Getafix

      Delete
  10. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/further-expansion-of-prison-estate-to-protect-nhs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Further expansion of prison estate to protect NHS
      A former Secure Training Centre will receive its first adult prisoners today as part of further work to temporarily expand the prison estate to protect the public and NHS during the Coronavirus pandemic.

      * Recently closed youth custody site in Kent reopened to hold up to 70 adult prisoners

      * Over 300 temporary cells now delivered to nine prisons

      * Extra capacity is reducing risk of outbreak in prisons, helping to protect local hospitals

      This follows the installation of the first of 500 temporary, single occupancy cells which began three weeks ago. Over 300 have now been delivered to nine prisons.

      Across the estate, prisons are moving towards single-cell accommodation, as much as possible, to limit the spread of infection and the number of deaths. The strong measures the Prison Service is taking - creating extra cells, limiting prisoner movement, releasing some prisoners early, isolating those with symptoms and quarantining new arrivals - are successfully limiting the transmission of the virus.

      The latest modelling by Public Health England and HM Prison and Probation Service predicts a drastic reduction in the spread rates of the infection, with each case being passed on to less than one person – meaning lives should be saved and the NHS is being protected from the impact of widespread local outbreaks.

      The former Medway Secure Training Centre, which closed in March, will be temporarily reopened as an annex to nearby HMP Rochester, housing up to 70 category D adult prisoners. It will be staffed by existing prison staff from local prisons in Kent.

      Temporary cells have now been installed to serve HMPs Highpoint, Hollesley Bay and North Sea Camp. Installation continues at HMPs Askham Grange, Coldingley, Hatfield, Lindholme, Littlehey, Moorland and Wymott with plans to deliver to further prisons across the estate as required.

      Delete
    2. Times...

      Matt Hancock has accepted a £100 bet that the government will meet its target of 100,000 Covid-19 tests each day by May 1, despite admitting the scale of the task.

      The health secretary said he would donate any winnings to Hospices UK after being challenged to the wager by Nick Ferrari, the LBC radio presenter.

      He acknowledged: “We’re still on track but it’s a big, big task. There’s a lot of things we need to get right, so there are no guarantees in this life.”

      Mr Hancock also suggested the objective was not necessarily designed to be met, saying: “The reason I set the target was to radically ramp up the number of tests.”

      He told LBC the scale of testing had increased “rapidly” throughout


      Delete
  11. He's a cheery old card
    Shouted Harry to Jack
    As they trudged off to Arras
    With rifle and pack
    But he did for them both
    With his plan of attack.
    The General.

    As the French say.

    Plus ca change
    Plus ca meme chose.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Heres the whole poem properl copied and pasted rather than badly remembered. Seems Sasoon had a crystal ball. Doesn't it....


    Good-morning, good-morning!” the General said
    When we met him last week on our way to the line.
    Now the soldiers he smiled at are most of 'em dead,
    And we're cursing his staff for incompetent swine.
    “He's a cheery old card,” grunted Harry to Jack
    As they slogged up to Arras with rifle and pack.

    But he did for them both by his plan of attack.

    ReplyDelete