As we all contemplate what the future holds for the probation ethos under the secretive command and control bureaucracy of the Civil Service, here's a forlorn hope from HM Probation Inspectorate:-
"a focus on practitioners’ skills suggests a shift away from managerialist top-down approaches which rely on the elaboration of guidance and procedural requirements."The quote is from an Academic Insight paper 'Supervision Skills for Probation Practitioners' by Peter Raynor published last Friday. Here's the nub of it:-
2.4 Skills, personal attributes and values
When we talk about ‘using’ skills, this does not usually mean selecting a skill from a behavioural repertoire like selecting the right spanner from a toolbox. What we are really talking about is skilled interviewing and interaction, and this is related to personal attributes and aptitudes. Some people intuitively and spontaneously engage and influence with or without training, but most people can benefit from being more aware of what they are doing in their professional roles, how they impact on others, and what options they have for making their contacts more productive. Analysing recorded interviews with an experienced colleague seems to be one effective way to do this. Training makes it more likely that people will choose a helpful approach, and for some people this will become something they do without having to think about it. People show natural variations in aptitude but most people can improve. Not everyone will improve to the same extent or maintain the improvement successfully, and some people might improve from a low starting point without reaching a level at which they can be consistently effective, but the message from research is that on average, training initiatives have led to real improvements and have enabled people to exercise a positive influence leading to reduced offending.
As well as personal attributes, people have values and personal commitments to what they want to achieve. These will not always coincide: some people have well developed skills of engagement and influence and use them for anti-social purposes, like confidence tricksters, card sharps and doorstep fraudsters. Readers will easily think of other examples in the public eye. Others have prosocial goals but lack the interpersonal awareness or skills to be as helpful as they want to be. Effective practitioners need skills as well as values and commitment, and now we know more than we used to about the relevance and impact of skills.
3. Conclusion and practical implications
3. Conclusion and practical implications
Recent and current research give us good reasons to expect that an investment in practitioner skills could, if well managed, have a significant positive effect on the effectiveness of probation services. The research shows that staff who consistently use a wider range of skills, with high levels of both relationship skills and structuring skills, usually help the people they supervise to achieve, on average, lower reconviction rates. In addition, practitioners can be trained to improve the range and level of skills they use in their individual supervision of service users. When practitioners’ views are reported they show that after initial anxieties, attention to skills is usually welcomed. The advantages are clear: improving the effectiveness of staff who are already employed and paid looks like a cost-effective strategy.
However, it also presents challenges to organisations: this type of staff development, which requires staff to take what often feels like a risk by exposing their practice to scrutiny, needs an environment in which staff feel safe, valued and supported by trusted management. It is likely to work best in organisations which are well informed about effective practice and committed to its development, and with practitioners who are resourceful, well informed and creative. There is also evidence that improved skills are more likely to be maintained and used when staff have access to regular supervision by experienced colleagues who have a good understanding of practice skills.
Initiatives and experiments need to be set up in a way which lends itself to evaluation (for example, with appropriate comparison groups and adequate recording of data) so that impacts can be identified and measured. Unfortunately, attention to evaluability has sometimes been missing in probation initiatives in England and Wales, and this means that learning opportunities are lost. In addition, a focus on practitioners’ skills suggests a shift away from managerialist top-down approaches which rely on the elaboration of guidance and procedural requirements. Instead, a full implementation of what we now know about skills would put the trained, skilled and resourceful front-line practitioner where she/he belongs, at the centre of evidence-based effective practice.
"this type of staff development, which requires staff to take what often feels like a risk by exposing their practice to scrutiny, needs an environment in which staff feel safe, valued and supported by trusted management."
ReplyDeleteThat shouldn't be a problem then, what with all that 'strong leadership' HM Probation Inspectorate keep on identifying.
Anyone got any concerns? No? Good, let's get on with it then. Read this and all your worries will melt away:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/822222/The_Proposed_Future_Model_for_Probation_-_A_Draft_Operating_Blueprint_-_HMPPS_-_19-06-2019_v.2.pdf
"these bulletins form part of our commitment to transparency as we implement these important reforms... We’re also keen to hear from you... Over the past month we have also been working closely with NPS and CRC leaders on the new structure - making sure the new design uses the best from both the NPS and the CRCs’ current operating models... We know there is concern that further structural change could potentially distract from our shared priorities - to sustain performance and support service users."
Confused? "While it is too early to provide much detail about the transition of staff to the new model, the programme is committed to supporting everyone through these changes and we will work to minimise concerns."
Finally: "In April 2019, alongside announcements about wider reforms to the probation system, a commitment was made to increase the professional recognition of those working across probation services. The Probation Professional Recognition Programme (PPRP) has been created to deliver this ambition."
In other news... Apparently the Uberliar BlairWeasel has described Prick & Dom's Brexit/GE strategy as "an elephant trap". A bit like the deception he & Campbell pulled off with his BlueLabour Trojan Horse, perhaps?
"a commitment was made to increase the professional recognition of those working across probation services. The Probation Professional Recognition Programme (PPRP) has been created to deliver this ambition."
DeleteHmmm...??? I looked at Merriam-Webster:
Definition of commitment
* 1a : an agreement or pledge to do something in the future
Definition of ambition
* 1a : an ardent desire for rank, fame, or power
* 1b : desire to achieve a particular end
There was no correlation between the words when using a thesaurus.
Language is important. Language is power.
It was no surprise to me when NOMS reduced the pre-sentence report to a computer-says menu of control-&-restraint. By removing the narrative they restricted, nay, removed the author's use of language & neutered the professional independence of the Probation Officer; they excised the opportunity to discuss, to assess & to propose considered options through reasoned, evidence-based argument. And now?
"A community sentence combines punishment with activities carried out in the community. It can include one or more of 13 requirements on an offender. The full list of requirements are:
- Unpaid work for up to 300 hours
- Rehabilitation activity requirement (RAR)
undertaking activities as instructed
- Undertaking a particular programme to help change offending behaviour
- Prohibition from doing particular activities
- Adherence to a curfew, so the offender is required to be in a particular place at certain times
- An exclusion requirement, so that the offender is not allowed to go to particular places
- A residence requirement so that the offender is obliged to live at a particular address
- A foreign travel prohibition requirement
- Mental health treatment with the offender’s consent
- A drug rehabilitation requirement with the offender’s consent
- An alcohol treatment requirement with the offender’s consent
- An alcohol abstinence and monitoring requirement with the offender’s consent
- Where offenders are under 25, they may be required to go to a centre at specific times over the course of their sentence."
??? I wonder how many requirements are imposed WITHOUT "the offender's consent" ???
Every single DRR and ATR I've had over the past 4 years!
DeleteNot one has had a signed consent form.
"a shift away from managerialist top-down approaches which rely on the elaboration of guidance and procedural requirements."
ReplyDeleteWe wish.
The MoJ HMPPS NPS staff guidance template is consistent:
- a Paragraph to a page explaining the work, written by someone who has had to look it up on Wikki and is still scratching their head while writing the stuff
- process charts describing the orderly progress of a bean though a series of boxes
- instructions on how to fill in yet more boxes in electronic records
The quote is from an Academic Insight paper 'Supervision Skills for Probation Practitioners' by Peter Raynor - What a load of patronising crap!
ReplyDeleteGoing back to the consent issue,the point that's missing is the bit when you were convicted in Court...its not up for discussion to see if you need to think about consenting, its a bloody requirement of the Court!