Just to keep things ticking over, here's a reminder from the Guardian of how the criminal justice system is unashamedly used for political ends:-
Boris Johnson’s crackdown on crime is just the latest ruse in the Tories’ class war
Our so-called justice system exists to crack down on the misdemeanours of the poor, while ignoring the crimes committed by the rich. When Boris Johnson proposes a law-and-order clampdown – driven by cynical electioneering, rather than actual evidence – he’s talking about locking up the “people you step over in the street”, as Frances Crook, the CEO of the Howard League for Penal Reform, puts it, not reckless bankers or white-collar fraudsters.
Lock ’em up, throw away the key: such demagoguery always has an innate emotional appeal, not least among a public enraged by increased violent crime, which is itself fuelled by a decade of slash-and-burn Tory economic policies. But further brutalising those already roughed up by a social order rigged in favour of yacht owners, financiers and the residents of Mayfair will satisfy the bloodlust of the Daily Mail and achieve little else.
The justice system has long been an instrument of class power. Under the “Bloody Code” of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, death sentences for property crimes proliferated: stealing sheep, thieving from a shipwreck, or pickpocketing could all lead to the gallows. Today, we tend to lock up mentally ill poor people, disproportionately from minority backgrounds, for non-violent offences.
According to the Prison Reform Trust, more than seven in 10 prisoners report mental health issues, a quarter of inmates are from a minority ethnic group, and more than one in five with sentences of less than six months are homeless. Nearly seven out of 10 languishing behind bars are there for non-violent offences.
If the government truly wanted less crime, it would reverse the cuts to youth services – slashed in real terms by 40% in the last three years alone – which a recent parliamentary report found had led to increased knife crime. It would clamp down on school exclusions: these have surged by 50% since 2016, partly to enable schools to climb league tables, driving some of the abandoned children into crime. It would entirely reverse the real-terms cuts to schools and the gutting of sixth forms. It would properly support a mental health service which turns away more than 100,000 children every year. It would confront a housing crisis which has left a generation without security or roots, and deal decisively with a squeeze in living standards that has particularly hurt younger people.
But the Tory party has spent a near-decade forcing the majority to pay the bill for the economic wreckage caused by its City of London donors: it is the custodian of a social order that robs humans of security and dignity.
If prison is a deterrent, why are nearly half of adults convicted of another offence within a year of release? There are already more people in Britain serving a life sentence than in Germany, France and Italy combined – but has it left us safer? Why has a report by the National Audit Office found no link between prison population numbers and the level of crime in different countries?
We leave prisoners locked up in squalid conditions for up to 23 hours a day, instead of focusing on education, training, exercise, and other means of rehabilitation – as called for by the Howard League – so why are we surprised that prison becomes a school of crime? There are few places worse for someone with mental health issues than prisons, rife as they are with violence and drug abuse, and shocking rates of suicide and self-injury.
Chris Grayling’s part-privatisation of probation has had a disastrous impact – and Johnson’s plans will undoubtedly prove a boon to profiteers such as Serco, which was fined millions for using taxpayers’ money to fraudulently tag non-existent people, and a calamity for the rest of us.
If the government had sense, it would learn from Norway, which has shorter sentences, fewer prisoners, humane prisons and an emphasis on rehabilitation: there, just 20% of convicts reoffend within two years, among the world’s lowest rates. It would learn from Portugal in decriminalising drugs and treating them as a public health issue: the country has the lowest drug mortality rate in western Europe, drug use is below Europe’s average, and the number of those incarcerated for drug offences has more than halved. But in the UK, no such sense is to be found.
While the justice system is a stick for the poor, it offers an abundance of carrots for Britain’s rich. Iceland managed to lock up dozens of bankers and CEOs for crimes committed in the run-up to the 2008 financial crash – but not one senior banking executive has been jailed in Britain or the US for their roles in unleashing misery that millions continue to suffer from.
The tax system is riddled with loopholes available only to the rich and big corporations, depriving the exchequer of billions of pounds at a time when we’re constantly told there isn’t enough money for basic services. Meanwhile, benefit fraudsters are sentenced for appropriating far smaller sums. Since 2011, UK prosecutions for financial crimes – supposed “white collar crime” – have collapsed by 26%, even though the number of offences has quadrupled. Nearly a decade ago, one leading judge declared that the justice system has an inbuilt bias favouring the wealthy; since then, the decimation of legal aid has left it rigged even more in favour of the rich.
The law continues to crash down on the backs of the poor – while pandering to the rich.
Johnson is seeking to turn a national crisis that has been stoked by his own party’s actions into an electoral problem for his opponents – and he will be aided and abetted by the rightwing press. But he is merely upholding a centuries-old tradition of protecting a social order rigged in favour of his own class.
If you are rich and destroy the economy, engage in white collar fraud, snort cocaine – you’re still likely to live unimpeded in affluence, continuing to be invited to mingle with the not-so-great-and-good of society. But if you are a black teenager in Hackney found in possession of cannabis by the police, your whole life could crash down around you. Whatever this is – it’s certainly not justice.
Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist.
And still everyone is over-excited by the misdirection that even Napo continue to celebrate (presumably because they've no option):
ReplyDelete"The part-privatisation of the probation service had failed on all counts and resulted in the government U-turn and the return of ‘offender supervision’ into the National Probation Service."
PRIVATISATION OF PROBATION SERVICES CONTINUES, AND WILL CONTINUE. That includes 'offender supervision'.
Sadly the Govt lie is being promoted everywhere:
Richard Ford in The Times: "but the justice ministry has proposed to allow up to a month from 2021 after the re-nationalisation of the probation service."
C4 News: "Theresa May’s government scrapped an attempt to privatise probation services in May this year and brought them back under the auspices of the National Probation Service, with extra funding for it to deliver services."
Mr Argar said: “We have changed the model we’re ending the CRC contracts, This is not just a matter of funding, this is about the model and what works.... We’re investing what we think is needed to make this new model work. It is a different model... we’re changing the nature of what we’re delivering, and we’re changing the nature of the model... It’s not just about money, we continue to invest in rehabilitation. If you’re trying to compare like with like I don’t think you can do that...
Independent: "Under the new model, 11 probation regions across England and Wales will have an “innovation partner” responsible for providing unpaid work, substance misuse programmes, training courses, community service and housing support."
And we know that 'innovation partner' means CRC-by-any-other-name:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/822222/The_Proposed_Future_Model_for_Probation_-_A_Draft_Operating_Blueprint_-_HMPPS_-_19-06-2019_v.2.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/819883/GMPTC_paymech_model_proposal_for_accredited_programmes_and_unpaid_work_contracts.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/816448/Probation_Change_-_ME_IP_ENABLERS_V1.1_2019-7-10.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/825112/Innovation_Partner_Commercial_Strategy__Market_Engagement__-_July_2019.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/825110/Payment_Mechanism_and_Performance_Framework_-_July_2019_-_version_2.pdf
All great news for the remaining 3,357 FTE band 4 probation officers in post as at 30 June 2019.
"This figure is a slight decrease of 30 (0.9%) since 30 June 2018 and a slight increase of 26 (0.8%) FTE probation officerscompared to 31 March 2019.
In addition to the band 4 probation officers, there were 2,460 FTE band 3 probation servicesofficers: an increase of 137 (5.9%) since 30 June 2018 and a decrease of 222 (8.3%) since 31 March 2019."
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/825011/hmpps-workforce-statistics-jun-2019.pdf
HMPPS doc above refers to "Probation practitioners and senior probation officers"
ReplyDeletePO/Band 4
30 Jun 2019 - 3357
31 Mar 2019 - 3331
30 Jun 2018 - 3387
PSO/Band3
30 Jun 2019 - 2460
31 Mar 2019 - 2682
30 Jun 2018 - 2303
Total Band 3&4 @ 30 Jun 2019 - 5817
Also:
761 FTE band 5 senior probation officers, showing an increase of 60(8.6%) over the previous year and an increase of 18(2.5%) since the past quarter
At 30 June 2019 it suggests approx 7 staff per SPO.
At 31 Mar 2019 there were 255,264 offenders on probation (HMPPS stats) & 6013 practitioners, which suggests approx 42 cases per practitioner. HOWEVER...
... surely the figures are only HMPPS staff, i.e. NPS, and do not include CRCs?
So if these figures are accurate how is it possible that staff have such high caseloads?
Q: How inefficient is the current system?
Q: How many senior management posts are excluded from these figures?
According to NOMS/HMPPS statistics, as at 30 June 2016 (relevant to the MEN article below) there were 3,372 probation officers in NOMS; and as at 30 June 2017 the figures given were 3,523 FTE band 4 probation officers.
Delete30/6/2016 - 3372
30/6/2017 - 3523
30/6/2018 - 3387
30/6/2019 - 3357
A Probation Service spokesman: "we have made significant efforts to prevent something like this happening again - recruiting 240 more probation officers in the North West"
Can this statement be true? Maybe someone could get Sophie Halle-Richards (the MEN journalist) to check that claim?
Interesting to find that all of the historical Probation Workforce Information pages (pre-2014) result in a "Page Not Found 404" message.
DeleteIn the bulletin prepared for 30 June 2014 the following is explained: "The manner with which Probation Services are delivered changed as of 1 June 2014. On that date the National Probation Service, which is responsible for the most high-risk offenders in the community, was created. Staff in the NPS joined NOMS as Civil Servants on 1 June and are included in this bulletin. The remainder of offenders in the community will be managed by Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs), which in due course will be contracted out to the private or voluntary (third) sectors. In the interim period before contracts are awarded, CRC staff will continue to be outside of the Civil Service and hence will remain out of scope of this publication. Information about CRC staff is published separately in the Community Rehabilitation Company Workforce Information Report"
That document is a colourful 1-page PDF:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/406818/community-rehabilitation-company-workforce-information-summary-report-q3-2014-15.pdf
There's no transparency, as usual, just a series of cryptic clues which lead nowhere. Or maybe I just didn't go to the right school?
HMPPS: "The Q3 2014 to 2015 workforce information summary report will be the final report produced, as the 21 Community Rehabilitation Companies became private companies on 1 February 2015 and are now responsible for the management of their own staffing levels."
DeleteAfter some scavenging around I found this page:
Deletehttps://www.gov.uk/government/collections/probation-service-workforce-quarterly-reports
Documents there show:
Q4 2010/11 - 5223 POs & 4801 PSOs
Q4 2011/12 - 4977 POs & 4675 PSOs
Q4 2012/13 - 4359 POs & 4351 PSOs
Q4 2013/14 - 4282 POs & 4244 PSOs
The Q3 2014/5 pre-sale CRC figures suggest:
1988 Band 4 staff & 3543 Band 3 staff across 21 CRCs
That seems to imply there was an increase of some 1,000 POs between 2013/4 & 2014/5. Not sure I agree...
To be more explicit & to clarify the point made by 20:47 -
Delete3372 PO in NPS 2015/6 + 1988 Band 4 qualified staff in CRC pre-sale
= 5288 total PO staff
i.e. an alleged increase of 1006 PO staff between 2015 & 2016 at a time when there were austerity measures, a pay freeze, budget cuts + voluntary & not-so-voluntary leavers *in advance of* the CRC cull that began in Sept 2015.
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/two-centuries-peterloo-and-still-so-much-fight
ReplyDeleteWent on the Peterloo Massacre tour today ( unfortunately unable to attend Manchester yesterday ) so sad that nothing really seems to have moved on
ReplyDeleteAnd still, ordinary folk who get shafted by tory policies, continue to vote for them. Why?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/culture/2013/jul/08/anarchy-in-peterloo-shelleys-poem-unmasked
ReplyDelete@ 20:17 you only need to look at England's history to find the answer
ReplyDeleteWhat ever policies the Government enact, however brutal and whoever those policies effect most, you can always rely on the third sector for support and assistance.
ReplyDeleteOr has that changed?
The work programme saw the involvement of many third sector organisations opposed to benefit cuts and benefit sanctions. But in exchange for funding they signed contracts agreeing to provide the DWP with information on individuals that ensured that benefits were stopped and sanctions imposed.
Homeless and Christian charities have obtained Government funding to assist rough sleeping. But in exchange for the contracts they signed to obtain that funding, they had to provide the State with information on the immigration status of those they helped.
It's been reported this week that Citizens Advice have agreed to a gagging clause in their Government contract to provide help and advice to those claiming Universal credit.
In 2010, the new coalition government slashed legal aid, made judicial review all but impossible, introduced employment tribunal fees that priced people out of recourse to unfair or illegal employment complaints.
They've done everything possible to prevent people challanging any policy that they wish to implement, or in reality, challenging anything at all they want to do.
It may be a class war, but it feels more like a dictatorship to me, and I just wonder, with more third sector involvement with probation on the cards, just what demands on those organisations that work with offenders will be made by government in exchange for funding?
It's a stinking world!
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/citizens-advice-signed-gagging-clause-in-return-for-share-of-51m-from-dwp/
'Getafix
https://www-independent-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/home-office-vfs-visas-profit-contracts-outsourcing-a9064226.html?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk%2Fhome-news%2Fhome-office-vfs-visas-profit-contracts-outsourcing-a9064226.html
DeleteIt is a class war, nothing more, nothing less:
Delete"Home Office outsourcing to ‘exploitative’ contractor must be reviewed, say MPs and lawyers
Calls for investigation into outsourced immigration services after The Independent revealed Home Office profits on UK visas surged by millions of pounds a week under private firm accused of exploiting applicants
MPs and lawyers have called for an urgent review into outsourced immigration services after it emerged Home Office profits on UK visas had surged by millions of pounds a week since visa operations were contracted to a private firm accused of exploiting applicants.
A joint investigation by The Independent and Finance Uncovered revealed on Sunday that the UK government made £1.6bn from visa applicants in the five years since it outsourced the bulk of its overseas visa services to Dubai-based firm VFS – a ninefold increase on the five years before."
From Disability News as linked by Getafix above:
Delete*Two charities that will receive £51 million in government funding to provide advice and support to claimants of universal credit (UC) signed gagging clauses that prevent them bringing the Department for Work and Pensions “unfairly” into “disrepute”.
Copies of the agreements signed last year by CA [Citizens Advice] and CAS [Citizens Advice Scotland] have been obtained from DWP by social welfare activist Frank Zola using the Freedom of Information Act.
He told Disability News Service (DNS) that the grant “does little more than help some people claim universal credit and not address its inherent flaws, it just helps impose UC misery on its service users, through this £51,000,000 bribe.
“Citizens Advice provides help to large numbers of those punished by universal credit, such as disabled people and families who have ended up losing thousands of pounds by claiming UC, vast rises in debt, rent arrears, evictions, survival crime, five week delays in first payments and the horror of its inbuilt benefit sanctions and excessive conditionality.
“Against this background, does Citizens Advice campaign and advocate for universal credit to be stopped and abolished?
“No, it decides to act as a mere duplicitous adjunct of the DWP and even agrees to a grant gagging clause that prevents them from being critical of the DWP.”*
A Probation Service spokesman said: “This was a dreadful crime and our thoughts are with Mr Hoolickin’s family and friends to whom we apologise unreservedly for the serious failings in this case.
ReplyDelete“Two of the staff involved no longer work for probation and we have made significant efforts to prevent something like this happening again - recruiting 240 more probation officers in the North West and providing extra training on drug testing, risk management and recall procedures.
“We have also introduced a database to track drug testing of offenders on licence, and will now carefully consider the coroner’s findings to identify any further improvements.”
MoJ kept quiet about this:
ReplyDeleteTitle: Offender Accommodation Pilot
Published by: Ministry of Justice
Publication Date: 12/01/2019
The pilot requires suppliers to provide stable accommodation and support services to eligible prisoners upon release from HMP Pentonville, Bristol and Leeds. The pilots will support male prisoners who are serving up to 12 months and who’ve been identified as being at risk of homelessness on release from custody. The supplier shall provide single bed, self-contained units to a minimum number of released offenders as follows: HMP Bristol 80, HMP Pentonville 184, HMP Leeds 156. The support in the community will total approximately 130 hours during the first 6 months, 78 hours for the next 6 months and 52 hours for the second year of support. The overall value of this service is 6 100 000 GBP across a 3-year contract. Service users will be accepted into the pilot programme up until 12 months after the agreed mobilisation date, with 2 years of support needed for each service user.
every homevisit we are at risk:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7372179/Pictured-Social-worker-stabbed-death-visit-Birmingham-house.html
A social worker who was stabbed to death at a house in Birmingham has been named and pictured as neighbours paid tribute to 'a lovely woman'.
DeleteBelinda Rose, 63, was discovered after officers were called to a house of multiple occupancy in the Perry Barr area at around 1.50pm on Saturday. She was pronounced dead at the scene.
Inderjit Ram has since been charged with her murder after his arrest on Saturday. The 52-year-old, of Great Barr, Birmingham, was due to appear at the city's magistrates' court today.
Neighbours in the area today paid tribute to Ms Rose and told of their shock at the killing. One resident, who did not wish to be named, said: 'It is really tragic, Belinda was the assigned social worker for the house which is a house of multiple occupancy.
'We used to see her all the time and she was a lovely woman. She really had a passion for her job and was brilliant with people.'
The local resident added: 'She used to check on the residents she was responsible for and ensured they lived the best life they could. We became quite close over time and she used to invite us to parties and nights out.
'I can't stop thinking about Belinda, and her family, she had been dealing with her husband who had been very ill recently, so for this to happen now is beyond belief.
'I've known the owner of the house for years too. I just can't believe this happened so close to our home, thank god the kids were not playing outside when it happened, anything could have happened.'
Another neighbour, who also wished to remain anonymous, added: 'There were police all over the place over the weekend, we knew something serious had happened.
'We used to see the woman coming and going from that house a lot of the time, she seemed really nice and friendly.
'Its really frightening when something like this happens so close to home. My thoughts are with her family, its dreadfully sad.'