Monday, 15 July 2019

The Folly of Berwyn

Peter Clarke might try and highlight some positives, but the still-half-empty HMP Berwyn has been a disaster, and the MoJ want to build more:- 

HMP Berwyn - a good start for a new prison but some important weaknesses

HMP Berwyn, a large, two-year-old prison near Wrexham, was found in its first inspection to be generally ordered, with good living conditions, but with some key weaknesses.

Peter Clarke, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, said that opening a new prison was a big challenge. “The prison opened with a very clear rehabilitative vision which has faced resistance at times. The leadership team are still working hard to find and maintain the right balance between rehabilitation and security, freedom and control, and sanctions and reward.

“Some mistakes have been made and we identify some important weaknesses, but we also acknowledge the great effort that has been made to give this prison a good start. The prison is generally ordered and settled, and… we found Berwyn to be a reasonably respectful place.” There was more to do, though, in the areas of safety, purposeful activity and rehabilitation and release planning.

Though Berwyn is a Welsh prison, about 75% of those held in March 2019 were from England. Around 23% of prisoners felt unsafe at the time of the inspection, a figure comparable with other training prisons. Assaults on prisoners were lower than in similar prisons, but the rate of assaults on staff was higher. There were signs, though, that both were gradually reducing.

Some work was being done to reduce violence but “delivery often lacked drive and needed to be implemented more effectively.” Inspectors found 25 self-isolating prisoners who were completely unsupported. Use of force by staff was higher than in similar prisons and incidents usually involved the full application of restraints. However, oversight was satisfactory.

Drugs had been too readily available, but actions by the prison to reduce drugs supply seemed to have had some impact, and the positive drug testing rate had reduced to 21.49%. This was, however, still too high and supply reduction initiatives required greater coordination and drive. Nearly half of prisoners said it was easy to get drugs and almost one in four said they had developed a drug problem while at the prison.

There had been no self-inflicted deaths since the prison opened and self-harm was comparatively low, but those at risk who inspectors spoke to did not feel well cared for.

Most staff at Berwyn were inexperienced and, though they were doing their best and contributing to a relaxed and positive atmosphere, many prisoners felt frustrated by staff inconsistency and uncertainty. Some poor behaviour went unchallenged.

The quality of accommodation and the general environment were very good, with in-cell showers, telephones and access to amenities. Mr Clarke said: “The prison had been successful in its aim to make such a large prison feel small. There was a real sense of community in most of the wings.”

Employed prisoners had reasonable time out of cell, though it was much worse for those without employment, who had about two and a half hours a day. Inspectors found 28% of prisoners locked up during the working day, “which for a new training prison was very disappointing.”

One of the greatest challenges facing the prison was the lack of activity places. Mr Clarke said: “It is difficult to understand how and why the procurement of work and training places for a new prison could be so delayed. Facing a rising population and too few activity places, prison managers had created a range of activities and there were sufficient places for the current population, but some were of inadequate quality and lacked challenge. Even those that were available were not fully used. Many prisoners were unemployed or failed to attend, and staff did too little to support a sound work ethic.” Those attending education or vocational training, however, generally received excellent teaching, made useful progress and achieved well.

The prison was struggling to develop its approach to offender management and resettlement. The make-up of the population was not as had been originally envisaged. Many prisoners were serving long sentences and presented a high risk of harm. Too many prisoners did not have an up-to-date assessment of risk.

Offender management caseloads were too high and case management was inconsistent and reactive. Public protection measures were similarly weak and the prison lacked sufficient offending behaviour interventions to meet the needs of the population. Work to resettle prisoners was, however, better.

Overall, Mr Clarke said:

“We met many managers and staff who were working hard to make a success of this new prison. Senior managers described themselves as ‘being on a journey’ and we saw lots of work, many policies and numerous plans. What was needed was better oversight, better coordination and more sustained delivery. The staff seemed to us to be a strength of the prison, but they needed support in delivering the basics consistently. We thought the prison had made a good start. We were impressed by the energy and optimism we observed and there was clearly the potential to move on rapidly.”

Notes to editors


A copy of the full report, published on 11 July 2019, can be found here.


HM Inspectorate of Prisons is an independent inspectorate, inspecting places of detention to report on conditions and treatment, and promote positive outcomes for those detained and the public.

In 2014, permission was granted for a prison to be built in Wrexham, and Berwyn opened on 27 February 2017. Built on a former Firestone Tyre site, Berwyn (when full) is the largest prison in England and Wales and the second largest in Europe. This report records HMIP’s first inspection of HMP Berwyn. It is the first prison to open under the management of the public sector for several years. Designated a category C training prison, the establishment held 1,273 prisoners at the time of the inspection. They were held in three residential units, which in turn were subdivided into a total of eight communities. In time the prison will be able to hold 2,106 prisoners, although we were told that currently numbers are capped to allow for the build-up of staff as well as additional activity for prisoners.

Notable features from this inspection: only a quarter of the population were Welsh; the prison’s capacity was 2,106 prisoners but it held 1,273; just over three-quarters of the population were serving sentences of four years or more; almost half of prisoners said drugs were easily available; three-quarters of officers had been in service for less than two years and about a third for less than a year; all cells had a shower, telephone and laptop computer; levels of self-harm were low for the type of prison.

This unannounced inspection took place between 4 and 14 March 2019.

--oo00oo--

Frances Crook of the Howard League can barely contain her anger:-

Berwyn prison: are we tolerating the intolerable?

I am still very angry about Berwyn prison. I was furious when it was proposed, furious when it was built and now it’s two years since it opened and I’m furious because I have been proved right.

Berwyn prison is built on a former industrial estate in Wrexham, an area that desperately needs infrastructure and employment investment. Instead, it got a prison costing some £250 million that has been beset with problems and has drained local health and police resources.

Berwyn was intended to hold over 2,000 adult men on remand and on short sentences. This was obviously a nonsense as Wrexham is not near to the courts it would have served. So instead its purpose was changed and now it is ostensibly a Category C training prison and holds men serving longer sentences, mostly two to ten years.

Immediately there is a problem. The design did not include sufficient activity spaces for all the men as it was envisaged they would only be in the prison for short periods. Now that men are living in the prison for years, a third of them are locked up almost all day because there are not enough facilities for them to work or do education.

The prison is shoddy. Prisons tend to be used for decades, sometimes centuries. So as well as wasting all that capital money, the taxpayer is ploughing tens of millions into the prison for generations, and the cost of maintenance will increase as the building was simply not built to a standard to last that long.

Berwyn contravenes international standards. The United Nations Mandela Rules, Rule 12 says “Where sleeping accommodation is in individual cells or rooms, each prisoner shall occupy by night a cell or room by himself or herself.” And the rules go on to stipulate that there should be natural light and proper ventilation. None of this applies in Berwyn. Men are forced to share cells and the toilet is inside the cell. So in modern prison, men have to defecate in front of a cell mate, with little ventilation. Revolting.

HM Inspectorate of Prisons has now published Berwyn’s first inspection report, which is disappointing because it seems we now tolerate the intolerable. The tenor of the report is that it made “a good start” whilst acknowledging that there are some important weaknesses. I disagree. The prison should never have been built, the design is flawed, and it is failing to get men busy or to protect the public. As many prisons are now in a deplorable state, the bar is set so low that any prison not totally awash with drugs and violence is apparently making a “good start”, despite a high use of violence by staff to control prisoners, nearly a third of men locked up all day (that’s nearly 400 men) and a quarter saying they feel unsafe.

There is reluctant recognition that Berwyn is not fit for purpose as two years since it opened it is still only half full. If it ever holds 2,000 men it will be a disaster. It is failing today – failing victims, failing prisoners, failing the local community in North Wales and failing the taxpayer. Yet the government plans to build even more Berwyns.

Frances Crook

6 comments:

  1. From FT 7th March 2019:-

    Two years after it opened, mystery surrounds the government’s prison of the future. As inmates continue to be crowded into older, dilapidated prisons, HMP Berwyn remains 40 per cent empty. Without the planned economies of scale, the prison that was forecast to be one of the cheapest Category C jails to run in England and Wales (at £14,000 per year per place) is currently one of the most expensive, at £36,000 per year per place. 

    The Prison Service says HMP Berwyn is going through a “deliberate phased population increase” and running costs will reduce over time, but its own annual business plans show the original schedule was for it to be “fully populated” nine months ago. 

    Julian Le Vay, a former finance director of the Prison Service, now retired, told the FT it was normal to build up a new prison population slowly, “but never this slowly”, particularly when “lives are being put at risk” due to overcrowding elsewhere. “There’s something going on there that they’re not being quite open about.”

    The Ministry of Justice declined to let the FT visit the prison and refused a request to interview any managers or officials. But information from prisoners’ families, prison officers, contractors and lawyers, together with reports and statistics gathered through Freedom of Information requests and MPs’ written questions to ministers, suggest HMP Berwyn remains half empty because key elements of the project have veered off track. 

    When the prison opened, some buildings were either unfinished or unusable. The Interserve workshops, which were meant to provide prison jobs for 520 inmates, are delivering a fraction of what was promised, according to data the FT obtained through an FOI request.

    Assaults on staff and “use of force” incidents by staff against prisoners are higher at HMP Berwyn than other Category C prisons, according to government data. Since the prison opened, 338 ambulances have been sent there, the police have been called 135 times and the fire service 27 times, the FT’s FOIs show.

    Injuries reported to the Health and Safety Executive, also obtained through FOIs, include broken bones, excrement flung in prison officers’ faces, and nurses intoxicated after inhaling second-hand fumes from synthetic drugs such as spice, said to turn people into “zombies”. 

    Reports from the prison’s health team show prisoners have been taken off prescription anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and painkillers without their consent, which some inmates say has driven them to self-medicate with illegal drugs. And Trent was suspended last year in mysterious circumstances. In a letter to MPs, one inmate called HMP Berwyn “the Rolls-Royce of prisons with a Ford Cortina engine under the bonnet”.

    It is not unusual for new prisons to have rocky starts: HMP Oakwood, a vast prison that opened seven years ago, began badly but is now running relatively well. And HMP Berwyn is still functioning far better than many of the UK’s jails. 

    But as the government prepares to build more new prisons, it is worth learning the lessons from this project’s early years. It is a story of good intentions undermined by bad decisions and bungled procurement — and a reminder of how hard it is to do something different when the wider system is on its knees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2019-07-05/its-like-a-youth-club-an-insight-into-britains-cushiest-jail-as-former-inmate-at-berwyn-super-prison-speaks-out/

      Delete
    2. It has been called Britain’s 'cushiest' jail. A former inmate at HMP Berwyn has lifted the lid on life behind bars at the controversial north Wales super prison.

      Christopher was released in May after serving eleven months for assault. He was moved to HMP Berwyn from Walton prison in Liverpool. He told ITV News was shocked at the lack of discipline at the Wrexham prison. “If you ask anyone in Berwyn they’ll all tell you the same", he said.

      Since it opened in February 2017, the regime at HMP Berwyn has caused controversy. Cells are called rooms and prisoners are referred to as men. The prison provides inmates with laptops, with a restricted internal internet, and telephones in their individual rooms.

      Despite these attempts at progressive rehabilitation, HMP Berwyn faces problems that are common in more traditional prisons. Twelve months ago, the Independent Monitoring Board published its first report on Berwyn which stated that a prevalence of illegal drugs at the prison was "the most common cause of prisoner violence".

      Christopher said hard drugs are still readily available at the prison. "There wasn't much difference sometimes between being in Berwyn to being at home in a party on weekends. Your doors were open you were in people’s pads, the music was loud, the ale was there, there were drugs available.”

      Christopher’s main concern was what he described as a "lack of control" by inexperienced prison officers. "As it stands the staff have got no respect off the inmates in there and that’s dangerous."

      A recent report by the Welsh Affairs Committee on Prison Provision in Wales revealed 89% of prison staff at Berwyn are in the first two years of training.

      According to the Prison Officers Association, more than 80 prison officers have resigned over the last 12 months.

      The Ministry of Justice disputed that claim to ITV News, but are yet to provide their own figures.

      POA national chair Mark Fairhust said: "Since 2010 we’ve lost over 7000 frontline prisoner jobs and they were experienced staff with a lot of skills that are needed to keep order and control in prison. We’ve exhausted the recruitment pool in north Wales and now we see very young inexperienced officers joining HMP berwyn with very few experienced staff to guide them.|

      In response to the points raised by Christopher the MOJ said:

      “Independent monitors have praised the work of staff at HMP Berwyn describing their efforts to establish a new prison as a ‘considerable achievement’.

      “Unfortunately, drug use is an issue affecting prisons across the country which is why we are taking unprecedented action and spending millions of pounds to tackle it. That includes our new investigative team working with the police to disrupt the organised crime fueling drug smuggling and, at HMP Berwyn, dedicated search teams, sniffer dogs and high-tech scanners.

      “Violence against our hardworking staff is not tolerated and we are giving prison officers body-worn cameras, police-style restraints and PAVA incapacitant spray to allow them to do their jobs more safely.”

      Delete
  2. https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-ministers-fear-prison-riots-after-no-deal-brexit/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The U.K. government is concerned that a no-deal Brexit could lead to prison riots over food and medicine shortages, according to a consultancy contract awarded by the Ministry of Justice.

      The document raises the prospect of “severe consequences” if contingency measures are not carried out by civil servants.

      The concerns are revealed in a Brexit consultancy agreement worth £458,000, seen by POLITICO, that was awarded to the consultancy firm Ernst & Young in January but only published by the government last week. Yet the document, detailing advisory work on “successful mitigation of risks of EU Exit,” was not properly redacted by officials, meaning that sections intended to be cut from the text released publicly could still be read.

      The improperly redacted sections laid out that Ernst & Young would work with the department and other areas of government to push forward contingency plans for either an orderly Brexit with a withdrawal deal or a no-deal scenario.

      In the event of no deal, it said: “Not progressing these actions plans could have severe consequences for MoJ Operations, e.g. unrest in prison because of undersupply of foods or medicines.

      “A clear understanding of the ‘real’ operational impact of a ‘no deal’ is necessary to prioritise mitigation actions. Refining the focus of planning efforts is imperative to ensure that the most critical contracts can continue undisrupted post EU Exit,” the contract reads.

      The redaction error also revealed the names of civil service personnel working on the contract, including the commercial director who signed it off.

      After POLITICO approached the department with questions about the contract, the link to the document was removed from the government's contracts database.

      Former Justice Minister Phillip Lee, speaking on behalf of the anti-Brexit People’s Vote campaign, said: “It’s clear that no deal would be disastrous for our country, and it would be a democratic outrage for any prime minister to try and force this on us without the consent of the people. Botched redactions like this just show how desperate the Government has become."

      He added: “No one voted for unrest in prisons, shortages of food supplies or any of the other indignities that could result from a disastrous no deal. This is yet another example of how the Brexit being delivered is a million miles away from the one that was being promised in 2016."

      Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon said: “This shocking revelation is yet more evidence of the threat a no-deal Brexit poses to our justice system."

      "From ending access to the European Arrest Warrant, to our prisons being up for grabs by American corporations in a post-Brexit U.S. trade deal, it is clear that a no-deal Brexit risks further damaging our justice system, which has already been weakened by nearly a decade of cruel Tory austerity.”

      Justice Secretary David Gauke last week told the Commons a no-deal Brexit risks “significant impacts across the justice system, including potential disruption to goods and services to our prisons.”

      A spokesperson for the department did not directly address the concerns about the potential for violence in prisons, but said: “The government has responsibly been preparing for ‘no deal’ for the last three years, including to ensure the continued supply of food and medicines in such an event."

      “The very purpose of this contract and our wider planning is to minimize disruption to the justice system.”

      Ministers have laid out a scheme to reserve shipping capacity for medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, which it believes will allow for uninterrupted supply assuming everything goes to plan.

      Delete
    2. The department also pointed to the resilience of the food supply chains when hit by adverse weather and transport issues, and noted that officials have been meeting regularly with industry to ensure Britain is prepared for Brexit.

      The contract between the MoJ and Ernst & Young was signed in January under the assumption Brexit would happen on the original exit date of March 29. It was later updated after the departure was delayed to state that it would last “as long as necessary” up to March 2020.

      Previous Brexit-related government contracts have included monitoring consumer trends of evidence of stockpiling, diplomatic training for civil servants and extra ferry capacity (from a company that had no ships).

      POLITICO found the awarded contract through the Tussell database of government tenders. Ernst & Young did not respond to a request for comment by time of publication.

      Delete