Wednesday, 26 February 2014

The Pain

I want to start off with an observation and a request. It's quite clear from where I sit that colleagues in all positions in every Probation Trust are getting more and more distressed as the full consequences of TR sink in. We know many are not coping well and are either off on sick leave, or rapidly approaching that point. 

Discussion on here of late has been spirited to say the least, but sometimes not that considerate of some people's position and feelings. Can I ask that before posting any comment, you first take a moment to consider how it would make you feel if directed at yourself and the boot was on the other foot? Some people are hurting a great deal so watch out for them and lets look after each other. I think this from last night neatly sums things up:-

I think what is happening on here is not trolling but people's fears coming through. The lack of real information coming out of what things will look like for every grade whether NPS or CRC will no doubt be wearing everyone down, causing enormous amounts of distress about what the future will hold etc. It is like we are all stuck on hold and it is the feelings of a total lack of control in our lives that is contributing to the fear. If people are turning on each other on here or in the offices, then we are no better than the government. Where are the values that we hold as Probation staff? It may be that in times of blind panic, people are forgetting them as self-preservation kicks in but don't forget who you are and what you stand for if you are considering turning on a colleague just because they were randomly assigned to one organisation or another.

To be perfectly frank, anyone in a position of authority reading some of the agonising and distraught comments left on here, and I mean Chief Officers and Board Chairs, should examine their conscience about the effect this is all having on their workforce now. Whether they are staying in some capacity or other as part of the evolving TR omnishambles, retiring or otherwise riding off into the sunset, what does it take to come out and bloody well say something about what is happening to your staff now?

Having said this I note that the one exception remains Joe Kuipers, Chair of Avon and Somerset Probation Trust who has picked-up on the typically insensitive language used by the predators currently circling us:- 

Embedded image permalink

In his most recent blog post he writes:-

"On the 3SC Website, in their TR update of 23 February, under the MoJ banner and logo suggesting full MoJ support, we see the following, as part of a briefing to VCSE parties interested in playing a role in the new TR landscape, and I quote: 

"How are you going to get your piece of the pie? (Securing your contract?)

You will need a strong USP and fully costed delivery model in order to secure a place in any of the supply chains that will be formed to deliver these services. You may be fortunate to have a relationship with a prime bidder already, if not in criminal justice then perhaps in the welfare to work market. Otherwise you will need to follow the media and sector news. The MoJ are currently facilitating these links for the voluntary sector in CPA events."

Now, to be fair this was just a small element of the advice given, but it is a very telling bit of terminology, a bit like the Justice Secretary's views about the senior and junior partners in the new arrangements (as he reflected in Danny Shaw's recent R4 programme, File on Four). So, our work, which I acknowledge (and always have done) is not perfect, has been reduced to a bit of competitive pie, actually an accurate description as it is carved and sliced and diced for a recipe that may not taste too good."


Joe also goes on to give some insight into the agonies being played out in every Trust as appeals begin to be heard:-

TEARS

"The reality for staff going through the assignment process has been painfully brought home to me when chairing appeal hearings. In our trust we are handling these in-house, although external consultancy was offered to assist (there is no way that we would devolve such a responsibility). I won't go into detail, but the pain for the officer involved in one such appeal nearly brought tears to my eyes - the officer presented the case with dignity, professionalism and was unsurprisingly upset through the process. So, this pie that others are talking about comes down to excellent colleagues such as this feeling torn apart, carved, sliced and diced. I know I have asked staff to try to work together in the future, but I can see just what a huge ask that is."

33 comments:

  1. I struggle to take JK's words as seriously as I might have done before, having read that he's taking his own slice of the pie by joining the TR conference circuit. It smarts, like salt in an open wound, and his once sharp observations are blunted. Is no-one immune to TR syndrome?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it can depend upon the nature of the contribution-we need people who are prepared to speak out about the realities of TR-the risks posed;not just have speakers who are all "gung-ho" etc for privatisation.

      Delete
    2. I am the person (as CEO) who invited JK to participate in our conference and he is not paid (None of speakers are paid which is a principled decision, they are speaking for the right reasons!).
      Its incredibly short sighted to say that his observations have been 'blunted' Thank goodness someone has been willing to speak up and be counted and not just rely on unfounded comments as an anonymous contributor.
      As an organisation, we exist to provide a platform for people to come together, communicate, share and work together. Those who are taking part constructively in this debate are those who will survive this tough period in history for justice and those who do nothing more than pick fault with those attempting to do something about it, will fall by the wayside.
      We live (and work) and its survival of the fittest and by fittest i mean take the opportunities which present even if that means significant change and don't cut your nose off to spite your face.
      JK is one of the most principled people i have ever met and should be commended and not shot at. It makes me very sad to see that the situation has caused you to make this comment. Its unjustified and unnecessary.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for responding Sue - much appreciated.

      Delete
  2. Remember everyone, they don't have a pie without us. That gives us a lot of power. How can we use this to our advantage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am so sorry to say this but they have the meatiest pie without us. We are the expensive filling. They will get rid of the existing staff and fill the pie with lower paid poorly trained/untrained fodder. So sorry...

      Delete
    2. Eventually yes, but initially they need us as we have all the expertise. You can't do the work with untrained people full stop. For all their bluster, they need us and they certainly need us come June !

      Delete
  3. http://www.justice.gov.uk/transforming-rehabilitation/competition - a diversion from excellent posting by Jim which I entirely support. Here is the details of the ITN documents which are freely available on MoJ website.They have the limited requirement of the contracts etc and are quite a read - there is lots missing and I for one would be steering clear if a bidder. The ITN has limited information with some documents requiring bidders to provide.

    On this site there are some forensic minds who will love this detail and be able to pick it apart and see the flaws!

    Also I note from a Twitter feed last evening Stephen Hornby , lead for SERCO rehabilitation is back on the manor with The Rehabilitation Company ( Catch 22, DHL etc) Who says SERCO is out of the bidding? Murky game politics ................

    ReplyDelete
  4. How about we all withdraw our labour for a couple of weeks beginning of June? They can't have us for breach of contract as trust contracts will have expired and new contracts will almost certainly not have materialised. They can't do this without us. The army cannot assess offender risk etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "You may be fortunate to have a relationship with a prime bidder already, if not in criminal justice then perhaps in the welfare to work market. Otherwise you will need to follow the media and sector news. The MoJ are currently facilitating these links for the voluntary sector in CPA events."

    In other words, it's not what you know, it's who you know. Unfortunately, in the probation business, public safety depends on what you know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps those bidders struggling could look to E-ACT, referred to on the news as a "Charitable Organisation".....not much charity there. For whatever reason, i.e. they are not profitable, too much trouble or just too much, 10 Academies have been dumped on mid way through the school year - with no idea as to who will be picking up the reigns, although I am sure that local authorities will be called upon in Mr Gove's time of trouble. Now I am certain the LA's would love to tell Mr Gove where to go....this is where things are so vastly different....the LA will step in, as it is in their make -up over many years of trying to deliver children education, where Mr Gove's fair-weather friends jump ship at the first sign of hardship, challenge or incompetency and guess what? There is no plan B.

    If this Government supports and encourages such bidders and organisations, without any regard for the impact on children, then shame on them...and it begs the question, if they can so easily sell off, children and let them down big style, what hope do our clients have?

    I am having a few days off, so probably watching to much news coverage...I was sad to hear of the demise of Bitecoin.....a virtual currency, which doesn't really exist, but whose crash has left people with worthless shares and out of pocket, feels like Karma to me.

    I also watched the catch up of last weeks QT...how can it be that the Secretary of State for Defense, cannot remember the name of another MP/panelist and refer to her (Liz) as Rachel, not once but twice in a 40 minute period..and he's in charge of our Nuclear Defense System? It is all really worrying!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I forgot, in relation to the pain everyone if suffering, I agree with JB and others, that we should not lose sight of our duty and responsibility to each other - irrespective of grade and shite.....none of us will come out of this unscathed, so take a little time, some of that time previously given gratis to your service and do something completely different. Over the years, when times have been difficult colleagues and I have - left the office and gone to a Matinee at a local picture house, we've finished early to go for an early bird, or believe it of not, visited the local Mecca for a round of Bingo and a plate of something which passed as dinner or just gone out for coffee - or similar. It may be a temporary respite, but a good distraction can go some way to heal the pain, halt it in its progress and for a short time provide some joy. (A bit of advise tho...if you do go to the local Mecca, be careful were you sit, some of those regulars are really territorial and do not, I repeat, DO NOT get over excited and shout HOUSE in error...as my son's reaction when I told him about my for-par, he shook his head and suggested I had brought shame upon the family.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Two weeks industrial action sounds good to me but before we do lets talk to the teachers, nurses and doctors and all sections of criminal justice.

    30 years in. where is the value in paper money? Paper money is controlled by the big banks who move it at will driving up the currencies of poorer nations causing a great deal of harm but make millions for themselves along the way. This is called the "Carry Trade" they cant do that with Bitcoin because it is peer-to-peer networked which means that ordinary people rather than big banks or governments are much more in control.

    Bitcoin is about £400 each at the moment 4 years ago they were worth 4 pence each. I have a few of them and I also have thousands of Quarks another cybercurrency. I think they are the future each transaction takes a second with no charge and no tax; at the very least research the topic or buy a few from me :) £500 quid to you me old mate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for that wee lesson in financial stuff - not my forte, as you may have guessed and you have a point re paper money...but like books, I'm old fashioned, I like the feel of it; I know there are Kindle's and stuff, and I have one, but still have hundreds of books, to look at even if I don't get round to reading them all...as my brother always comments, never before has he seen so many unread Christmas presents in one place.

    I think I was a little overwhelmed by the amount of time and space given over to money that the vast majority of the population - I hazard a guess - don't use, as opposed to the minuscule amount of time and space given over to our plight in Probation. Your talk of Quarks reminded me of a joke about Grots, but I can't remember it in full, so can't share. Can you spend Bitecoins or Quarks at the Bingo?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Maybe some of the comments and concerns raised on the blog this week could be directed here?

    http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2014/february/have-your-say-on-the-criminal-justice-and-courts-bill/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you have relevant expertise and experience or a special interest in the Government’s Criminal Justice and Courts Bill?

      If so, you can submit your views in writing to the House of Commons Public Bill Committee which is going to consider this Bill.

      Further information: Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

      Aims of the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

      This Bill would make a number of changes to aspects of the criminal justice system including sentencing; cautions; prisoners’ release and recall; and the detention of young offenders.

      It would also reform court proceedings and costs; establish a new system of strict liability in contempt proceedings; create new offences for juror misconduct; make changes to the conduct and funding of judicial review claims; and amend the law on extreme pornography.

      Delete
  11. I was surprised that recently a commenter made sneering criticism of Joe Kuipers for Planning to Speak at a Conference about TR

    Hopefully most probation folk of my generation would be very wary of jumping to conclusions - such attitudes - being cautious about inferring bad motives from behaviour we have little knowledge of - is what enables us to build strong relationships with clients who have done bad things - so that within those relationships, many clients accept our serious challenging of their behaviour, in such ways that the clients can get a better understanding of when they are vulnerable to offend and so can - if they choose - change their own behaviour.

    (That is why I see the term 'offender manager' as worse than useless and counter productive.)

    Anyway back to Joe Kuipers comment on Twitter: -

    "For info I am on the advisory board of @NoOffenceCIC and will be speaking at the TR conference on 19 March, unpaid. Why not?"

    https://twitter.com/joekuipers/status/438711686389063680

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps recent less-than-honourable behaviours by napo, moj and trusts have taken their toll on some people's capacity to be trusting of others' motives? Perhaps lending one's name to a cause and giving it oxygen is the answer to "why not?". Not everyone twitters away, so thank you Andrew for making Joe's twittering more accessible.

      Delete
  12. I s someone running a 'book' on when the millionth blog viewer will come - I suspect before Split day 1st June!

    But as an addict I avoid betting nowadays, so will not suggest a wager!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Would there be less individual pain if there had been more collective solidarity? Probation workers were terribly weak and naïve in failing to appreciate the threat. There were leadership failures but there was also a disturbing amount of apathy. More surprising of workers who one would suppose would have an above average awareness of political realities. Clearly not. Given what individuals now know about TR, would they have acted differently if the clock could be turned back? Many individuals in probation worked hard to oppose the dismantling of probation over many years – attending meetings, marching, lobbying, leafleting and striking – but more did nothing. This would be a good time to hold a strike ballot. Yes, I know Napo have signed up to the framework agreement, but they were at pains to tell us they never signed up to the assignment process – the process which is causing a lot of the pain. Those POs assigned to the CRCs have precarious futures.
    If there is pain out there, there is also anger. What better time to capitalise on this and call a ballot over the damn assignment process. I suspect not as union jobs at Chivalry Road are safe, they have a seat on the Probation Institute and they have probably already calculated what membership base they need to maintain their status quo. This is an opportune time to do something radical. Don't just say we do not like the assignment process and leave individual members to their fate – say this assignment process is fundamentally unfair, and warrants a call to members for solidarity and collective action.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm with Netnipper on this.
    Our branch was almost defunct 18 months ago (apart from a few old die-hards) - involvement is now up to about 30 o/o - but the apathy has been truly shocking overall and seriously undermined our voice. Coupled with the relentless spinning and shiny presentations of the 'facts' from the top, it is now no longer just the managers trotting out the mantra 'we are where we are' in my office. Oh, and no one has a monopoly on pain. Things said in anger may also be coming from very deeply held convictions and pain.But yes, let's harness that energy and direct it outwards. Two week strike in June ? - count me in.
    Deb

    ReplyDelete
  15. The previous ballot for industrial action remains 'live' as our industrial action is, officially at least, ongoing, via the 'work to rule'. A further strike can be called without need of another ballot. While the assignment process is certainly wrong however it is looked at a strike specific to that would be too limited, and while clearly not the intention, could constitute acquiescence to the wider TR agenda - essentially an argument on how TR is introduced rather then an objection to TR itself. A strike against TR is still mandated, and that's where we should be heading...

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'd go for that too, its a chance for all of us to show solidarity now we have clearer understanding of the crap coming our way.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Nothing to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hate to state the obvious but there just isn't the stomach for strike action. As regular readers / contributors to this forum we are sensing a more militant tone. Unfortunately it is a relatively small group of regular named bloggers, combined with what I guess is also a limited number of "anonymous" colleagues that make up the majority of the content of our daily debate. In my office only two of us regularly discuss this site and i can tell from reading our area "talking wall" that the hottest topic in recent weeks was the seemingly devastating announcement that those allocated to the NPS would be paid at the end of the month (in arrears) as opposed to the current arrangement of the middle of the month !. People generally seem resigned to their fate.
    I am equally convinced that neither NAPO or Unison have the bollocks to call for strike action . . .lets be honest, thay were almost embarrassed / apologetic in instigating the one day . . .errr two day . . .errr two x half day strike last yr. By all accounts some areas are just getting on with it, identifying high ROH cases in readiness for the split. Colleagues allocated to CRC are far from envious of their NPS colleagues, instead discussing the merits of not having to churn out robotic PSRs on a daily basis. I note that some regular contributors to the 'PO Twiitter' site are commenting that they won their appeal against being sifted to CRC, but then opted for CRC as a preferred option.
    Another observation which doesn't seem to have generated much discussion is the proliferation of senior management posts. I thought anyone at SPO level and above were seriously concerned that they would be joining the ranks of the unemployed . . as far as i can see there are going to be two distinct organisations with double the number of managerial roles !.
    For every one of us that will stick to our guns and only perform the tasks commensurate with our job description there will be others ready to go the extra mile in the hope of fast - track to management. We are a disjointed bunch made weaker by inneffective unions.
    When we eventually find out who the successfull bidders are for the CRCs, what happens if only one 'mutual' is chosen ? e.g. if the Manchester area Mutual prevails does that mean that all the other Mutual bids were somehow inferior . . will we ever get to know the sifting criteria ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspect a very fair analysis of the situation - but you can never be sure of much due to the fog of war and confusion of battle. This whole thing could still be derailed at any point and for any number or combination of reasons,

      The number of people being difficult and subversive could be going up, but as you say, there will always be those only concerned about the really big issues such as what day of the month the pay cheque arrives.

      I had no idea there are some winning appeals against sifting into a CRC - only to subsequently opt for a CRC - don't quite understand the logic.

      Delete
  19. In my area too there have been some promotions to ACO to fill newly created ACO posts. I can't see that bidders would want to keep them all though. I think they might be streamlined quite quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sodexo Justice Services aren't shy about funding their bid team. Ad here with 2 March closing date - up to 6 months @ £350/400 daily, or £80k pa pro rata. Don't think they're too worried, do you?

    http://www.sodexojobs.co.uk/jobs/job/Commercial-Finance-Manager-Bids-Tenders/9738

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sodexo Justice Services has been operating in the United Kingdom since 1993. We operate five prisons in the UK and have a reputation for operating excellent, ethical, innovative and rehabilitative services. Our vision is to become a strategic partner of our clients by designing, managing and delivering quality of life services which make a meaningful difference to offenders by changing lives for the better. We pride ourselves on delivering services that provide best value for clients, taxpayers and society.

    Due to an exciting pipeline of new business opportunities we seek to add a senior Commercial Finance Managers to the Bid team for a 4-6 month period. These roles will lead the finance work streams on tenders – ensuring our responses are comprehensive, competitive and compelling. The roles are technically challenging, commercially complex and require an almost obsessive capacity for detail.

    Role

    Provide expertise in financial modelling and analysis for bid related work and ad hoc projects
    Actively guide and support operational decision making with acute financial insight through a range of techniques including sensitivity analysis, bottom-up costing, investment appraisal and state-of-the-art modelling
    Developing and maintaining a strong, positive yet challenging relationship with the broader Bid team.
    Work extensively with HR in the analysis of TUPE data with to identify a range of potential staff options and their financial impact
    Provide operational resilience to the existing prison estate and during mobilisations where a finance lead is required
    Deputise for the Head of Commercial Finance when required.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never been called "an exciting pipeline of opportunity" before. What a lovely way to start another new day mired in TR-infected bollox.

      Delete
    2. Or maybe its you that cant see it!? It could fall in either direction and who would end up with egg on their face then?
      I for one would not be prepared to risk having no future and would rather embrace the change and do what i can to ensure that those for whom we hope to keep safe-the public are kept safe and i note that there has been no mention during this debate, anything other than 'poor me', no mention of the significant risk to the public if this doesn't work or to the offender, whose future may well depend on the intervention they receive from us 'professionals'

      Delete