Tuesday 4 February 2014

Mobilisation!

As things start getting serious, the Ministry has begun invoking the language of the military and occupation by issuing 'mobilisation' orders to all Trusts. We know this because Joe Kuipers has kindly published the document on his blogsite, presumably because someone down at the Ministry forgot to protectively mark it. 

Joe has not passed comment, beyond observing that 'it places a lot of implementation risks with Trust Boards'. I shall comment and say that things are getting critical in some Trusts with distinct signs that the wheels are beginning to come off, so much so that I hear the MoJ are offering inducement payments to Senior Managers to make sure the cracks can be papered over and the TR timetable achieved. Here is the MoJ mobilisation order in full:-


MOBILISATION ACTIVITY


Following the decision to give notice of termination letters we thought it would be helpful to write to:


  • clarify the mobilisation activity that still needs to be undertaken to ensure that when the National Probation Service (NPS) and the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRC) assume their service delivery responsibilities the new systems are to the fullest extent possible already operating effectively; and

  • invite you to up-date your exit management plans accordingly.


A number of you have welcomed the certainty that the decision on termination has brought, as it is now clear that the Trust service contracts will formally end on 31 May 2014 with the new CRC and NPS services commencing on 1 June 2014. In order to be ready for the new operating structures to be switched on, we will be looking to work closely with you to undertake activities that will give you and your staff further clarity about, and confidence in, the systems that will be operating from 1 June.


We think that the best way of doing this is to continue to work to current plans so that by April:


   The imperative work to have given staff certainty about their organisation destination has been completed and they have clarity about the future team structures, including the name of their manager.
·   
     The operational processes have been finalised and how the interface between the NPS and CRCs will operate is clear – including having worked through the details of your feedback on local variations to central processes and whether these can be accommodated.


·    There is clarity about the overall Operating Model which will operate on 1 June 2014 and, where it does, how this will differ from the Operating Model at end state.


     The technical aspects of the set up of CRCs and the NPS are well advanced. This includes the articulation and commencement of activity relating to the Property Transfer Scheme, treatment of local contracts, and clarity on both statutory and non-statutory relationships.


·    Aspects of the IT package which were due for completion by April are completed and that we have clearly articulated what these are as well as any additional work we intend to do to assist steady state operations into the summer.


The activity that is already in train will ensure that we make best possible use of April and May to mobilise structures and processes in a meaningful way, providing staff with the confidence and clarity they require to make transition on 31 May/1 June as smooth as possible.


We want to facilitate the adoption of new core processes from April and to work with you on creating plans to do this within existing Trust governance. We are clear that authority for service delivery rests with Trusts until 31 May, but would ask that in creating the plans outlined below you work closely with the new NPS and CRC leadership teams, in line with the expectations in Schedule 11 of your Contracts, to ensure there is a strategic join up between existing and future delivery structures.


Our clear expectation is that Trusts will begin operating the new allocation process with effect from 1 April.


In addition, we know that a number of Trusts are already looking to restructure teams to mirror future arrangements and that others are now looking to do work in this area. Clearly, the wholesale adoption of new structures cannot take place until 1 June and any work to progress local restructuring prior to this does not amount to delivering mergers in the same way as was originally envisaged for April.


However, we see considerable value in all Trusts starting, by April, the reconfiguration of their team structures and their front line managers into the new CRC and NPS structures to the fullest extent that is feasible within the existing Trust governance and boundaries. Doing so will enable staff to begin to familiarise themselves in real time with how the new processes work and how the CRCs and NPS will work together to manage offenders. This reconfiguration should be done in accordance with your local policies and procedures.  In addition, we would expect too that during May ACOs will be convening their new management teams during May, whilst remaining fully accountable to the Trust Chief Executive and Boards until 31 May. 


In line with the above, please will you confirm by 21st February how you intend to up-date your exit management plans to begin mobilisation of the new services as we have outlined. A number of Trusts have already made clear that they intend to implement as much as they can. This is an approach which we strongly support, not least because it will provide all staff with the very best basis for full implementation. 


To assist you in planning your activity we will do the following:
  • Issue a template to help you up-date your exit management plans.
  • In the bulletin this week we will issue the latest versions of the RSR tool and the associated guidance documents.
  • In the bulletin on the 10 February we will issue a draft of the interim state Target Operating Model covering the period from June to new provider contract commencement.
  • In the bulletin on 10 February we will also set out the terms of reference for a support structure to operations covering tiered support from advice points through sharing of best practice to targeted intervention.
  • In the bulletin on 10 February we will also issue guidance setting out how to make the local changes within nDelius to support the reconfiguration of your teams. You will need to undertake this activity once you are clear on the team structures. 
  • On 14 February we will be reissuing the Batch 1 and 2 operational processes and the RSR tool and guidance. You have seen most of these documents before and therefore this should confirm rather than change your emerging plans. We will also, by 17 February, issue any additional training products about the operational processes that are required to support you in ensuring that staff are clear about these by the end of March. As you will be aware, your nominated trainers are already attending events to begin to familiarise themselves with the core changes in order to cascade this information within your Trusts. It is our expectation that the core principles of the processes will not change. Therefore planned activity to ensure that prior to 1 April the right staff are aware of the changes in processes that impact on their work should continue.
  • During the week of 24 – 28 February we will be facilitating a series of scenario tests in order to stress test elements of case management and process and understand better where pressure points may exist. This will help us set out further support or guidance where it is needed.
  • At the beginning of March we will also issue some desktop manuals to Trusts for key staff who will be covering new processes to use once the new processes are in operation.
  • We have also established that by the end of March we will have been able to upload forms required for new processes and have switched on the field in nDelius where the RSR score can be captured. It is our intention to free up the field required for recording the new RSR tool result, and to ensure that new referral forms and templates are incorporated into the system before 1 April so that the tools to support the new operating processes are available to staff.
  • Information regarding the contract arrangements for the beginning of 2014/15 will also be included in the bulletin.


We appreciate that the work to restructure teams, introduce the new operating processes, and ensure the technical set-up of the CRCs and NPS is being undertaken alongside maintaining business as usual and with you and your Board and Executive colleagues holding the ring on the extent to which this is progressed.


Ensuring that the time between now and April is used effectively to prepare for the introduction of new structures and processes will mean that the period between April and June can be used to embed these changes so that the transition on 1 June to the full interim operating model is as successful as it can be. 


Armed with all of this information and as stated above we are asking that you confirm what you will be able to implement from 1 April by 21 February


Thank you.

21 comments:

  1. How senior does one have to be to be offered the pieces of silver, sealed with the Judas kiss?

    Grayling & Wright sound like expensive decorating contractors. Rumour is they were formerly known as Bodgit & Scarper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I heard yesterday that Innovo mutual has advertised for a senior manager- most be a qualified PO!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure that there is somebody out there who will take their pieces of silver. Mark them well for this is thine enemy!!

      Delete
  3. I think theres just too much happening and changeing accross the CJS for anything to be expected to work.

    http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/03/youth-justice-young-adult-offenders-prisons

    ReplyDelete
  4. The justice secretary, Chris Grayling, has clashed with his own youth justice chiefs over his plans to close a dedicated network of seven young offender institutions across England and Wales that hold young adults aged 18 to 20.

    The Youth Justice Board has warned Grayling that abolishing a distinct regime for the 2,200 young adults and mixing them with older adult prisoners will put at risk much recent progress and seriously compromise current work with them.

    Justice ministers have said the current approach of holding 18-20-year-olds in dedicated YOIs instead of adult prisons is no longer appropriate or effective. "When large numbers of people in this age group are held together, they can become so volatile it becomes difficult for staff to manage them. If this continues, there is a danger that the experience of young adults in custody will become more about containment and less about rehabilitation and supporting them to desist from offending," the prisons minister, Jeremy Wright, has said.

    But the board has said it does not accept that repealing the sentence of detention in a young offender institution and mixing young adults with older prisoners will provide the protection and support required to rehabilitate 18-20-year-olds at the peak age of offending.

    It says there is little evidence that mixing age groups reduces violence, and questions whether any such gains are outweighed by the negative aspects of larger adult prisons, including easier access to drugs.

    Some adult prisons are so volatile that they "will be wholly inappropriate for young adults and should be excluded from use for this group," the board says. It says that at the very least there needs to be dedicated units inside adult jails to hold them.

    The former Liberal Democrat justice minister Lord McNally is due to take over the chairmanship of the board in April.

    Grayling is preparing to publish a new criminal justice and courts bill on Wednesday that will include sentencing reforms, including an £85m plan for a "secure college" to hold 320 12-17-year-olds. The bill is also expected to include a new sentence for "going on the run", under which prisoners released on licence who fail to return when recalled could face an extra two years on their original terms.

    The shadow justice secretary, Sadiq Khan, said Grayling's proposal to scrap dedicated youth jails for 18-20-year-olds could lead to more disturbances and undermine efforts to rehabilitate them.

    "What is he thinking putting young impressionable people with hardened older offenders? Rather than rehabilitating them it could lead to them learning the very worse tricks of the criminal trade," said Khan. "It could also lead to bullying and intimidation of the youngest offenders. It may save money in the short term but it will cost more in the long term and mean countless more victims of crime."

    A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "We are carefully considering the responses to the Transforming Management of Young Adults in Custody consultation and will provide an update in due course."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Young people will die.This is a retrograde step that will result in an increase in deaths in custody.

      Delete
  5. Grayling has a bigger project - it is about creating a smaller state and there is a coterie in or close to the heart of Government driving this through. Grayling is one of the architects, as is Gove and I think they are also building on the work of some in the last Labour Government like Lord Reid, now at G4S.

    My MP, Priti Patel is working from the backbenches. They seem to be driving through their reform agenda as ruthlessly as folk like Aneurin Bevan drove the Labour nationalizing reforms did in the 1945 Government but not as openly. They realise that this maybe their only chance before the 2015 general election and they have found some dupes like Lord McNally to help them. I am not sure about Cameron and Clegg but we seem stuck with it now.

    However, it is not too late to save localized unified probation service(s) but an absolute refusal to collude is vital. I personally would not work in any way for either a CRC or NPS & would do an alternative lowly paid job if that was the only alternative. However, I am retired and so not so challenged as others are. I remember with shame that I colluded with the dreaded 1991 CJA rather than leave probation again - I had tried (for a few months) a locum Social Services job and it did not give me the autonomy that being a probation officer then did and the support staff were very limited and weak, unlike in probation.

    Napo's HQ is stretched and weakened as a consequence of the energy & money needed to clear up the disasters that came because there was not enough membership control of what was going on centrally. It seems that many fail to understand that Napo is US not THEM - I guess they grew up in the age of consumerism, rather than having a sense of shared responsibility for ALL that happens in the public sphere of life in the UK! We need to remember that we have never had a fully functioning democracy that takes its authority from the collective voice of all people - we are subjects - maybe not exactly of the sovereign but of the government(s) our UK system throws up. I envy those in Northern Ireland, Scotland and even Wales who have more autonomy, but equally more individual responsibility for their governance, both locally and nationally, than us in England.

    That was probably a dyspraxic diversion too far. Localised unified probation will only be saved by focused opposition; otherwise the best we can hope for is a chance to reinstate it after TR crashes - as it will. Those who think they know best seem to be ignorant of the way criminal justice and particularly the courts and prisons actually work. Though, it maybe that we risk the courts losing their independence; maybe the celebrations around the anniversary of the signing of Magna Carta in 2015 will bolster the importance of judicial independence?

    Andrew Hatton

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mactailgunner explains that UNIONs will continue to negotiate for members with the CRCs

    http://www.napo2.org.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=478&p=2504#p2500

    Andrew Hatton

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh how I am laughing at those idiots who think we are going to be mobilised......they really haven't got a clue have they ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. There is an old military saying and one that I always have in mind when writing sentence plans: even the best laid plans rarely survive contact with the enemy!!

    I would imagine that, with the enemy being within CRC's and NPS then the damage is going to be both intensified and difficult to manage ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Think of that saying with MoJ in mind , the contact with real people in the shires and cities has been the undoing of the TR programme !
      I like to think of it like cycling into sand.......

      Delete
  9. unfortunately work will not be getting any help from myself with hitting these deadlines. So sorry but its a really bad idea and doing things to help it ready for the sell off would be an insult to probation and what it stands for. Chris Grayling TR already feels like a dying star that is about to implode into a black hole sucking in all matter and light.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, my response if asked will be two words long, the second being 'off'. I have no desire to ensure that Grayling's TR is a sucess.

      Delete
  10. The tone and content of the document re mobilization, is, in the main, gobbledygook. How strange to think all these mobilizing instructions going on around me and I haven't noticed. With the exception of now only having a high risk caseload, copious amounts of parole reports, and PSR's I have no notion of what is expected of me in the next 8 weeks or so, It is therefore all the more worrying, given CG wants us all functioning in our new roles etc before 1.4.2014, so as to practice it and new processes so as to provide a seamless change from 31.5.14 - 1.6.2014. He is having a laugh, surely?

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's terrifying. If this goes according to plan, I will hand over at least 80% of my work on 1/4/14. I hold mainly community cases with a high proportion of high risk domestic violence, child protection and sex offenders. I scored virtually nothing on 11/11/13. I have a caseload of around 45 and I write around 4 complex PSR's a month, specialising in mental health and immigration cases. Oh! I forgot, have 3 lifers and 2 IPPs on top. Not any more. I'm going to have the most beautifully filed nails in the CRC while I watch my colleagues in NPS collapse and my cases flounder. If anything is criminal, this is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too true. I've started already. I'm gonna be nothing but difficult about this. I feel very alone but it won't divert me !

      Delete
    2. Well done AND thank you - you may FEEL alone but as is clear from this Blog, Napo Forum, Twitter & Facebook, there are hundreds, at least, who will be doing the same as you, so that WE are all protected in the long run as collusion now, will result in more protracted damage and hurt to the nations of England and Wales.

      Andrew Hatton

      Delete
  12. I will not be joining the Probation Institute, the new organisation that bridges the transition from public to wider ownership. I have a professional qualification and a record of practice that evidences my ability to do my job. As a member of Napo, I belong to a professional body. Should my new employer (who doesn't exist yet) require me to pay to join this I will refuse. I am more than happy to be the test case at a tribunal for declining to join a voluntary scheme.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I also will not be joining the Probation Institute, the new organisation that bridges the transition from public to wider ownership.

    I have already unfollowed the Probation Institue on twitter.

    ReplyDelete
  14. PI, WI, QI, Why-eye, Private Eye, I-Spy - me head's spinnin' pet, I cannot cope with anymore. Since 2000 or so I've heard tell of a number of POs being appointed without a specific PO qualification (I believe they all had a SW qualification). They have invariably risen to managerial posts in local areas or NOMS. All of this TR has been a long time coming, planned and constructed and implemented within the probation organisation at various levels. The various areas have been gradually eroding terms and conditions, increasing PSO responsibilities to include caseloads, then programme treatment, then PSRs, pay and leave and increments and weighting, etc. Tools for managing and measuring have been imposed. Now we're paying for our laissez faire and general lack of backbone. Too trusting, too distracted by our own professional focus, not cynical enough to believe we were being shafted from the inside out. Who Killed Roger Rabbit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see the creeping destruction going back further - as far as the ending of consent in Probation Orders and automatic early release from the 1991 CJA.

      I am not sure if there was a grand plan from the inside - I have not been a practitioner since 2003 and it does seem as if terms and conditions have slipped massively over this period, particularly the role boundaries issue.

      My complaint - which others did not seem to share back in 2002, when I moved from a seconded prison job after 5 years, back to a field office - was it was not in my job description - issued in 1990 - that I be a word process operator or a computer operator, both tasks at which I lacked competence and had never been properly trained to do.

      As a school child I asked to be taught to type but was not allowed into that class due to being 'the wrong sex'! I was required to undertake technical drawing and woodwork or metalwork - none of which I was very capable due to my then un-acknowledged disabilities of dyslexia and dyspraxia. However, I could not evade the computer operator requirement in 2002 and my career came to an untimely end.

      If only, we had organised properly at that time, but that was then and this is now - let the resistance be solid now.

      Incidentally Roger Rabbit's difficulty was not that he was killed but framed! (He was not the only one!)

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096438/

      Andrew Hatton

      Delete