Friday 17 January 2014

Omnishambles Not On Target - Shock!

Just as predicted by Joe Kuipers, Chair of Avon and Somerset Probation Trust, the slow train crash that is the TR Omnishambles is in trouble and the schedule is slipping. This just in from Napo HQ:-

Dear Members,
Trusts were today given an official stay of execution until 31st May in a notice issued by Michael Spurr. This is recognition that the timetable set out by the Secretary of State just isn’t safe.

Napo, alongside sister justice unions and others interested in safeguarding probation will be seeking clarification about the wider impact of this delay, in particular on the proposed share-sale timetable. If it’s too risky to close Trusts on 1st April then any planned share sales must also be delayed – even Grayling has said all along they need at least 6 months for CRC’s to bed-in before they can be sold off. This two month delay would take us into 2015 before planned share sale. This takes us very close to the General Election period and any further delay can bring us over the campaign finishing line victorious.

The list of identified and recognised risks has, if anything over the last few weeks got longer not shorter. The risks continue to cover professional delivery risks and practical, organisational concerns – ranging from still developing a case risk assignment tool through to not being able to set up any HR systems until staff have all been assigned. The unions have been working hard to address transfer “measures” with the PA and MoJ Officials but we will not compromise members’ interests or public safety to fit a politically motivated timetable and there is increasing acceptance that many of the challenges are difficult to address in a way that works.

The unresolved risks are just as critical to the share sale process and timetable. In short, you can’t put an accurate price on something if you don’t know what it accurately looks like and how it actually works. That is as true for any seller as it is for any buyer. Until all of the risks are addressed the sell-off is economically as well as morally and professionally unsafe.

With competition very limited and the risks on all sides high then the price goes up and Grayling may not be able to afford a sell-off. Any reputable bidders will also be concerned about being blamed for future failures when buying something that doesn’t work. Today’s delay in closing the Trusts highlights the continuing risks and should be seen as massively positive for our campaign to prevent the sell-off.

This is now an even more critical campaigning period – as Sherlock might say, “The game is afoot.” Michael Spurr’s letter to Trusts says, “We now, more than ever, need to maintain the momentum for change we have achieved through the hard work done to date”. These words hold far more credibility when transferred to your efforts and hard work in fighting the break-up and sell-off of a successful service. Every grievance registered is logged and passed to bidders to add to their risk columns. Today’s announcement and the delay in the split shows that momentum is really with us.

Keep up the campaigning and look out for further updates and more information over the coming days and weeks.

Yours sincerely,

Dean Rogers
Assistant General Secretary

This from Heather Munro, Chief Executive of London Probation Trust:-

Transforming Rehabilitation Update – Termination of Probation Trust Contracts 

We have been waiting to hear from the Ministry of Justice about the formal termination of our contract.  In a teleconference with Chiefs and Chairs earlier today, it was confirmed that Probation Trust contracts will not now be terminated until 31 May.   

This means that you will continue to be employed by London Probation Trust until 31 May 2014. 

Please note that the assignment of staff to the National Probation Service and Community Rehabilitation Company to new organisations will continue as planned.  We are expected to complete this allocation process by 1 April. 

The new date is designed to enable staff in both Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) and in the National Probation Service (NPS) to trial the new ways of working before the Ministry of Justice formally completes the transfer to the new governance arrangements. 

The Ministry of Justice is also intending to make the full transition to new IT and support systems in areas like HR by the end of May. 

  
From 1 April, cases will be allocated according to the future structure.  However, problematic cases will not be transferred between probation staff unless there is a suitable time to do so which ensures there is not a risk to public safety. 

Stop Press - this is the MoJ spin doctors at their best:-

Important milestone for critical probation reforms


A further step towards the Government’s reforms to rehabilitation has been announced today as probation trusts were informed that staff will be assigned to one of the new organisations responsible for managing offenders and tackling our shockingly high reoffending rates by 1 April.
Notice has now been given that probation trust contracts will be closed down by 31 May this year, as plans have been finalised for the transfer to new arrangements. It is expected that probation staff will be working in their new teams by the start of April, with some teams in place as early as February. The new ways of working will then be fully tested and systems rolled out ready for the formal transfer.
The new system will see current probation officers transferred to one of the new Community Rehabilitation Companies that will work to rehabilitate low and medium risk offenders, or the new National Probation Service that will be tasked with protecting the public from the most dangerous criminals. More than half a million crimes are committed each year across England and Wales by those who have already broken the law and our reforms are aimed at finally tackling these unacceptable reoffending rates that see more needless victims created every day.
Justice Minister Jeremy Wright said:
“These reforms will finally address the glaring gap in our system that currently sees around 50,000 short-term prisoners released onto the streets each year with no support, unchecked, to go back to their criminal ways. We have always been clear that these thorough plans will be rolled out in a controlled way that ensures public safety at every stage. We will continue to engage with all relevant parties as these reforms are introduced to ensure a smooth transition.”
Testing of new systems has already begun and will continue until the transfer to new arrangements. A key element of the programme will see a nationwide network of resettlement prisons created so nearly all offenders are released into the area in which they will live and be supervised. Our new approach will see providers only paid in full if they are successful at reducing reoffending, making hard-working tax-payers’ money go further and ensuring all sentences deliver both punishment and rehabilitation.
We expect successful bidders to be in place and delivering services by 2015.

26 comments:

  1. Not the time to gloat - but didn't we all say the timescales are impossible?
    Did we also say that moving 18000 people onto a shared system was impossible in the time (and may still be), did we not say that the Ndelius was not going to cope ??? When will someone listen to us - We know the systems , they are like an old Lada car - they will go , but you have to know how to treat it properly ........I feel invigoured(!) to keep the pressure on , the cracks are becoming chasms and now watch for the blame game ....who's fault is this ????

    ReplyDelete
  2. Talk about not motivating your staff. I have been allocated to CRC and my appeal has not been upheld. I have over 10 years experience in the service and my current caseload is over 50% MAPPA and high risk. I now have to continue working with these cases until they are taken off me. I will do my best but to be really honest my heart may not be in it. The risk for SFOs is getting greater day by day...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow. How did u end up in CRC if over 50% of cases are high risk? Are you based in London

      Delete
    2. *Should say MAPPA and / or high risk. Medium risk MAPPA category 2 level 1 cases don't attract many points. I wonder if they will remain medium risk when we mess around with their management.

      Delete
  3. To any would be bidder this is the kind of farce you will have to deal with if you bid. You are in for a world of pain, no structure, completely unmotivated staff, problems all over. Think carefully about financial and reputation damage before bidding. You have to be brave. You have been warned.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To any potential bidders who may be reading this, I offer this 'advice'. The staff (at least in my office) are completely unmotivated and has clearly stated that they will do what is required and nothing more. Any goodwill is gone. Any hope of getting it back is gone. Any belief that you may change this is completely misplaced. There will be no open rebellion, just subversive tactics aimed entirely at undermining TR and your desire to make money.

    You will not.

    Caveat Emptor!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. They want their cake and to eat it. You'll be in CRC but still holding your high risk and MAPPA cases...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes good luck with that, not happening.

      Delete
    2. I feel that it would be helpful if NAPO/Unison gave CLEAR and unequivocal advice as to what CRC staff can and cannot do with their high ROH cases come April 1st. I'm actually VERY shocked that they have not!

      Grayling is officially down on record as saying the NPS will hold high risk cases.
      It's in Hansard if the PTB do not believe me!

      Delete
  6. A couple of things suggest this is significant news: the timing involved in putting this out on a Friday, at the last possible moment when Trusts were expecting their 10-week notice; and the fact that the MoJ are already spinning this as a natural part of the process.

    Something, or perhaps many things, have finally put the wind up them. Now is the time to get busy exerting pressure on MPs, and increasing the volume about a campaign of passive resistance. I sincerely hope national Napo are working on this, and will be bringing it up with my branch chair as soon as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What is becoming even more apparent then I ever thought is that MoJ don't know what the fuck they are doing. It seems like they are deciding what to do as they go along. If I was a bidder I wouldn't bother as the closer this TR crap is being put off to the election the more like that your contract will be ripped up if Labour get in. You've been warned.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Has anyone got any idea what will be happening to PPO cases if this mess goes ahead? Many of mine are medium ROSH. Do the bidding companies know they would be getting these cases? I bet they don't even know what a PPO is!

    With PPO cases being T4 cases managed by POs but CRCs not having to have officers with PO qualifications I wonder what they will do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have heard it suggested that NPS POs could be seconded to IOMs/ PPO teams.

      Delete
    2. My colleague and I are both PO's in the IOM and are both CRC (as are many other PO's in my trust who work in the IOM).

      From what I have been told in my area, there does not appear to be a huge amount of PO's given NPS and I'm not entirely sure the split will reflect the workload!!! I have a bad feeling that mistakes will be made, simply due to rushed decisions due to high caseloads and reports!

      Delete
    3. Response to 20:48
      So potentially they will be moving an IOM PO to CRC, taking all their cases off them and giving the cases to a PO who has gone to NPS and leaving the PO in the CRC with little or no PO role or responsibilities. Can they legally do this?

      Delete
    4. I've heard that the IOM will be in the CRC.

      Delete
  9. Oh dear....did some nasty little minister not listen to what he was being told (which it turns out, was the truth)? THIS WILL NOT WORK AND IT WILL PUT PUBLIC SAFETY AT RISK.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Link to house of lords OR Bill paperwork

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2013-2014/0072/14072.1-7.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. Link to 14-1-14 debate per Hansard

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140114/debtext/140114-0003.htm

    ReplyDelete
  12. Alternative annotated technicolour version with voting record at bottom of page

    http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2014-01-14b.729.2

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think I've finally worked out what it is that disturbs me most about Grayling, Spurr, Wright et al - they don't blink. The PR spin above is an excellent example, as is Spurr's letter if you can get to see a copy. Not a beat is missed as the automatons carry out their annihilation. Is it a third eyelid? Is it the lack of (a) reflection? Hmmm... Exterminate, Exterminate, Exterminate - ideological single-mindedness expressed in a harsh tone devoid of emotion and based upon historical stormtroopers who merely carried out orders, I believe.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There is a certain satisfying irony in MoJ/NOMS, having spent years setting fatuous time-related targets for trusts, to spectacularly miss one of their own. The biter bit methinks.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm planning to send letters to my caseload. This is my first draft to the first one:

    Dear Client

    As we have built our relationship over the last eighteen months, you have learned to trust me and you have shared some of the most intimate details of your life and your deepest, darkest thoughts. I have asked you questions that cross all social norms, and although you were reluctant at first, you now tell me. I know about your first sexual experiences. I know about what you fantasise about when you masturbate. I know how often you masturbate. I know what your favourite sexual activity is.

    Your engagement and attendance at the Sex Offender Group has been excellent. I am sure that you do not want to hurt anyone else and I know that you welcome and appreciate the help and support given to give you your own internal controls to make that happen. As we both know, this is not going to be easy or quick and that is why there are so many restrictions on your licence.

    I'm so pleased you are still feeling safe in your home. It was difficult to find an accommodation provider who would take you on. I'm sure the tenancy support partners we work with will continue to help you. Keep up working with the Education, Training and Employment advisers too! We know that having a job (that I approve (!)) will be one of the best things to help you reduce your risk.

    I am so sorry to tell you, because our partners and I have done all this work with you and with other people on my caseload, that on 11 November 2013, a decision was made that I can't work with you anymore. I don't know who your new officer will be but I hope to be able to introduce you to them.

    I know this is going to be difficult for you to cope with. Please try your hardest not to let it stop your progress. I wish you all the best for your future. It's a long, hard road, I'm sure you'll get there.

    Best wishes

    Your Old Probation Officer

    ReplyDelete
  16. REQUEST FROM Mactailgunner: -

    "Please keep the comments coming. They will be collated and passed on to the heart of the MoJ. Meanwhile, support one another."

    Please ask readers to Make comments about assignment process as it affects them and how they feel here: -

    http://www.napo2.org.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=423

    POST REPLY : -

    http://www.napo2.org.uk/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=reply&f=2&t=423

    Will need to Register and/or login first : -

    It is easier than it may seem, I attempted an explanation beginning here: -

    http://www.napo2.org.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=428

    Andrew Hatton

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dear Jim
    could we set aside one day's blog, notified in advance, so that we can all write one reason why TR will fail. This should be specific and work related eg information exchange being affected and preventing accurate risk assessment ( statutory agencies refusing to deal with the new CRCs) . We should indicate which trust we work for, or area of work but no personal identifiers. This would allow accurate comment representative of the whole workforce and prevent Grayling and his minions from dismissing this as union influenced. No personal comments about him but cogent reasons that we know from our individual practice that they have failed to address. Good idea ?

    ReplyDelete