Monday 13 November 2023

Matters Coming to a Head

The Independent caries a powerful piece outlining the probation crisis and how it cannot pick up any extra work to try and alleviate the prison crisis:-

Criminals released from prison ‘left free to kill’ as overstretched probation service in crisis

Exclusive: 59 offenders being monitored after leaving prison went on to be convicted of murder in just one year – with at least five cases blamed on failings in an overstretched probation service

Mistakes which led to dangerous criminals released from prison going on to kill could be repeated as new government plans heap further pressure on a probation service already in crisis, The Independent has been told.

Officials are dealing with “appallingly” high workloads due to an exodus of both staff and experience, union leaders warn – prompting fears that convicts will be free to strike again. There are also concerns that the system will not be able to cope with plans to send fewer convicted criminals to jail – part of the government’s scramble to free up space in overcrowded prisons – without radical change. The unions are holding a crisis meeting this week with justice secretary Alex Chalk to discuss plans for low-level offenders to be spared jail and to demand more funding.

The aunt of Zara Aleena, a young lawyer murdered last year by a man wrongly freed from prison despite his violent background, warned that other families could suffer a similar tragedy to hers without government action.

Warnings about the perilous state of the probation service came as:
  • Ministry of Justice figures for 2022 show 59 people have been convicted of murder committed while either in the care of probation or by those who had recently left supervision
  • Mistakes within probation have been directly blamed in the murders of at least five people in the past two years
  • One union said orders to release prisoners up to 18 days early – which have recently come into effect – are already increasing pressure on probation staff
  • Figures show there were 2,390 fewer full-time probation officers than the required 6,780 as of June – a shortfall of 35 per cent
  • Nearly 1,650 probation officers have quit their jobs over the past two years – a sharp rise since 2021. Two-thirds of those who quit in the last year had five or more years’ experience
Speaking to The Independent, Aleena’s aunt Farah Naz said: “The compromised and overstretched probation service, coupled with officers experiencing low morale, heightens the risk of additional errors, potentially leading to grave consequences and – at its worst – a tragic recurrence akin to the murder of our Zara.”

Tory MP Elliot Colburn, who chairs a cross-party parliamentary group on restorative justice, added: “While we’re waiting for investment and trainees to come through the system, how do we make sure that we are still able to deliver a good and safe level of service? We don’t want to end up with another Zara Aleena case, and absolutely that will be going through people’s heads at this time.”

But Ian Lawrence, head of the probation union Napo, warned that this risk remains “until we see politicians take steps to offer better support for the service, work with us to find ways to reduce workloads and motivate experienced staff”.

He described hearing “harrowing” accounts from newly trained employees – some handling twice the number of cases they should be – suffering “nervous meltdowns” and fearful of going to work.

While Napo backs plans for prison sentences of less than a year to be scrapped for some criminals, Mr Lawrence warned there is “no way” to suddenly increase capacity in probation without sacrificing existing aspects of the job, which sees officers supervise and rehabilitate offenders both in prison and in the community and assess their risk to the public.

He added: “If senior politicians – who have now woken up to the fact that probation matters – want staff to help them out of the hole that they’ve dug for themselves on prison overcrowding, then they need to engage with us in a way that motivates staff to undertake this work. That includes seriously talking to us about the need for a paid remuneration package to help us through this crisis.”

Sir Bob Neill, Tory chair of the MPs’ justice committee, said that while Mr Chalk’s plans are “the right thing to be doing”, there must be “a proper awareness of the resourcing implications” for the already “very hard-pushed” probation service.

Ms Naz said ministers’ plans to reduce prison numbers and reoffending rates “require a comprehensive, sustainable approach that won’t further demoralise an already beleaguered service. If staff morale remains low, as it seems to be the case, mistakes are likely to persist,” Ms Naz said, raising concerns over the impact that further overburdening a service “already in crisis” could have on morale.

In the year to April, more than 400 charges for serious further offences were brought against offenders either in the care of probation officers, or within 28 days of leaving supervision. Out of 86 cases analysed by inspectors, 30 involved murders and 20 related to rape. “Risk of harm” assessments were found to have been inaccurate or incomplete in 44 per cent of these cases, and 42 per cent of perpetrators had previously been assessed as medium-risk.

Mr Lawrence said: “Our members have to work under that shadow of ‘have we looked at the case properly when I’ve got twice the workload I should have?’ People are under so much pressure that they cannot always guarantee they do the necessary checks and balance. Now if we get an influx of early release prisoners back into the community we’ve got to be sure that the supervision leaves no doubts about them risk-wise. So we can only do that if some of the other work we do drops off the edge.”

At this week’s meeting, unions are trying to determine which parts of probation work can be cut back, said Mr Lawrence: “Unless the government does something to retain staff, the haemorrhage is going to get worse.”

Just one of the 31 Probation Delivery Units (PDUs) inspected between June 2021 and July 2023 was rated as “good”, with 15 given the lowest rating of “inadequate”, then-chief probation inspector Justin Russell said last month. On average, each was scored just five out of a possible 27.

Two-thirds of probation officers described their caseload as “unmanageable”, up from 50 per cent two years ago, said Mr Lawrence. In what inspectors say is “a reflection of the stress” many employees are under, 55 per cent of working days lost to staff sickness in the past year were due to mental health issues – up from 43 per cent five years earlier.

Confronted over the huge staff vacancies and “unmanageable” caseloads by a House of Lords committee last month, Mr Chalk was asked whether the probation service could cope with any more work. Mr Chalk replied: “We’re completely onto it, lots of resources are going into this area, and I think you will see a recovering and improving probation service over the coming months and years.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Our hard-working probation officers do incredibly important work protecting the public and helping offenders turn their backs on crime. That is why alongside our long-term reforms to prisons to keep the public safe from crime, we are ensuring the Probation Service is well resourced by investing £155m extra a year compared to 2019 to recruit more staff and reduce workloads."

22 comments:

  1. Mr Chalk replies “we are totally on it…”. Wise words indeed, although what they are on is probably magic mushrooms, as the Tories grasp of reality doesn’t appear to align with the world that I live in. After today’s revelations an embalmed Margaret Thatcher is a shoe in for the Ministry of Justice. Although Esther McVey (diagnosed as clinically brain dead) has been seen crawling into Number 10. So who knows what Rishi! has in store for our beloved colleagues in the hell of their own making (MoJ). I was however, disappointed that Sue Helen (Suela) got the chop. Diversity is important in public life and even the deranged deserve a leg up finding work. So she departs to her grand tent to await the next chapter in her professional life. She will be missed…by the Daily Spite and a few other tawdry rags.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For once I agree 100% with everything Ian Lawrence has said. His response tells it as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fuck off MoJ spokesperson. Probation, which you neither understand or value, is pretty much gone. You keep recruiting, and you keep losing. I hope you're getting paid at least minimum wage to type this bollocks

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yesterday's Guardian:-

    A killer and rapist who spent more than half a century in prison before being released by the Parole Board has been convicted of carrying out a further sexual assault at the age of 81.

    Ron Evans, who killed a young woman in the 1960s and in the 1970s was called the “Clifton rapist” for a series of attacks in Bristol, was found guilty by a jury on Monday of assaulting a woman he had befriended at a drop-in centre.

    Questions are being raised about why Evans was released and the effectiveness of his monitoring. He revealed in court that he had not told his probation officer he was volunteering at a centre that vulnerable women attended.

    Evans was convicted in 1964 for the rape and murder of Kathleen Heathcote, a 21-year-old shop worker who vanished from her home in Nottinghamshire. He was jailed for life but served only 11 years before being released on licence, and moved to Bristol.

    During an 18-month period from the summer of 1977, seven women were sexually assaulted in the Clifton, Redland and Westbury Park areas of the city.

    In January 1979 police launched an undercover operation in which young female officers wearing plainclothes and male officers dressed up as women were sent out on to the streets to try to draw the attacker out.

    On the last night of the operation, an officer called Michelle Leonard was grabbed by a man who told her: “Don’t scream or I’ll kill you,” and started to drag her into a garden. Leonard pushed him away and the man was caught by a colleague. It turned out to be Evans, who admitted five attacks and was sent back to prison.

    Even at that time there was concern he had been released after the murder of Kathleen Heathcote. “Life should mean life,” Leonard said in the ITV News film Decoy, which told the story of his capture.

    In 2004, while still in jail, a cold case team linked him forensically with two other attacks in Bristol that he had denied and a judge said it was likely he would never be released.

    But Evans was freed in 2018 and began to work as a volunteer at a centre in London. During his trial at a London crown court, it was alleged that over a three-year period he sexually assaulted two vulnerable women, both with disabilities.

    The jury heard he was convicted of sexual offences in the 1970s and had spent many years in prison but did not hear he was the Clifton rapist and a convicted killer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evans told the court he was a reformed character and had “a lot of remorse” over his previous offending. Evans, now 82, was found guilty of one sexual assault against one woman and cleared of two others against a second. He will be sentenced on Thursday at the Old Bailey.

      The campaign group Women Against Rape expressed concern over the case. It said: “Despite being identified as a serial attacker by the police and courts, Evans has been repeatedly released and enabled to attack other women. Why do women’s lives and safety count for so little?”

      A spokesperson for the Parole Board said: “A panel directed the release of Ronald Evans following an oral hearing in 2018. Parole Board decisions are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community.”

      Delete
  5. The Independent carried another powerful piece yesterday in my opinion.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/probation-staff-quitting-burnout-prisons-b2441117.html

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes you're right - I didn't notice what with so much going on - apologies 'Getafix!

      When Mary joined the probation service in 2018, she believed she had found a job for life in helping offenders to rehabilitate back into society and protecting the public.

      But just five years later, she has decided to follow more than 2,000 of her colleagues who quit the service in the year to March – a tenth of the full-time workforce.

      Following a failed privatisation drive and several high-profile murders in which the probation service had wrongly labelled the killers “medium-risk”, the system is in crisis. Morale is low among staff, two thirds of whom say they are struggling under unmanageable workloads, as last-ditch government plans to free up space in overcrowded prisons threaten to heap an influx of new offenders into their care.

      Mary, who is one of around a dozen probation services officers (PSO) in her office, told The Independent of having to personally handle 65 low and medium-risk cases – with inspectors judging that 50 is the limit at which officers can effectively deliver on rehabilitation and public protection.

      “That’s 65 different individuals whose risk needs to be managed, most of them being in the community,” she said. “It’s very anxiety-provoking working in these conditions because you just don’t know what’s going to happen, and unfortunately with a lot of practitioners things do get missed.

      “Even when they’re in custody, you’re still attending the panels, doing paperwork, reports ... it’s never-ending. I don’t think there’s enough hours in the day to do this job.”

      When people under the supervision of probation are charged with committing serious further offences, the official reviews of these cases are circulated among all staff. There were more than 400 reviews in the year to April. When 86 of these cases were analysed by inspectors, 30 involved murder and 20 rape, and in nearly half, the ‘risk of harm’ assessments were found to be inaccurate or incomplete.

      “The first thing [the reviews] will say is: ‘caseloads are too high, the practitioner couldn’t manage, this was missed because the practitioner is overworked and had to remember 101 other things’,” Mary said, adding: “It just feels like it’s falling on deaf ears.”

      “We are completely overwhelmed, morale is low, and we have multiple people in our offices on long-term sick leave – so six months or more – because it is so stressful,” she continued. Across the service, more than half of sick days last year were related to mental health, which probation inspectors also say is “a reflection of the stress that many staff feel themselves under”.

      Delete
    2. “The main thing is the lack of staff,” said Mary. “People leave the service because it’s too stressful, but the fact that nobody else is there to share the load – it’s a lot harder.”

      But there is strain across the system. “A lot of the work we do, we take on from other services,” said Mary, who received six weeks of training prior to starting as a PSO in 2018.

      “It took me two days last week to work on a housing referral because it had 10 pages. That’s not my job, I don’t work for housing, but I know that this person cannot be on the streets of London, because that could make them susceptible to reoffending and put the public in danger.

      “We don’t want that, so now I’m doing everybody else’s job plus my own. It becomes very, very frustrating and you have no work-life balance. I left the office at 10pm last night. I have a key for my office, because I stay there so late that I have to lock up. As soon as I get home I’m in my bed because I’m so tired, so drained. I wake up at 6 o’clock again to do it all again. No trainee would see that and think it’s a life they want.”

      While a national recruitment drive means there were 2,600 people training to become probation officers as of 31 March, the most recent data showed nearly one in six of trainees were giving up.

      “They are thrown in headfirst a lot of the time, which I think is what scares them off,” said Mary, who is in her 30s. “They’re supposed to be protected with the amount of work they have and cases they have, but what I find is that, when the office is in need, then that’s scrapped.”

      Mary said she had seen trainees leave with just two months left to complete of their 21-month probation officer training, after hearing their colleagues with 20 or 30 years experience warn they have never “seen the service in the state that it’s in” – and that “it’s not sustainable”.

      While Mary believes her older colleagues “are only here because they feel they can’t go anywhere else” and are “just waiting for retirement age”, younger recruits are using their experience in probation “as a stepping stone” into other government departments, companies and charities.

      “A lot are moving into the charity sector to do what they had intended to do in probation,” said Mary. “It’s very hard to do the therapies and rehabilitative work when you’ve got 65 people to do risk assessments, processes, you’re constantly in meetings with other professionals.”

      Warning that “we are doing a disservice to people who really need rehabilitation”, she said: “We really are their first port of call to lead a positive life and get back on track. But because we can’t dedicate that time with them and have that one-to-one rapport building kind of relationship, they don’t get what they truly need. And then what happens? They end up back in the service, and the service is again under pressure. So it’s a revolving door.

      “And in the meantime we have really big crimes ... and lives are lost unfortunately – we are responsible for a lot and not being able to do what we truly want to do has an impact, it has an impact on everybody.”

      Meanwhile, the service is bracing itself to deal with more offenders in the community. In eleventh-hour plans to free up space in prisons, justice secretary Alex Chalk announced last month – with immediate effect – that inmates can now be released up to 18 days early, and is also seeking to ensure that many offenders with sentences of up to 12 months are spared jail.

      But Mary plans to have left the probation service by the time the latter change comes into effect.

      “I have given it everything I can and I don’t have anything more left for it. I never wanted it to come to this. This was a job for life. It was a service that I definitely believed in and purposely studied to be involved with – and I’ve been in it for less than 10 years, and I’m ready to leave it.”

      Delete
    3. I notice this comment:-

      I was in the probation service for just over 20 years, retiring in the late 90's, it was never this bad despite us undergoing massive changes back then. We did not like it when all our reports had to pass the scrutiny of a colleague, then a few years later we did not like it when they didn't! Change is not welcomed. The introduction of computers was largely experienced as more work not less.

      My heart goes out to all the dedicated folk like Mary, who have had their working lives ruined by political leaders who have no real idea how the criminal justice system works and have largely destroyed it rather like they have many other social services and the health service.

      But 6 weeks training!!!????? (presumably on the back of a relevant degree or is that followed by the 21 months?) I had 2 years training on the then 1+1 Home office course, the first as a student in studies and on placements and the second, doing the job with a protected case load. Interestingly my pay in my second year of training was higher than it had previously been as a Surgical Ward Sister. Nurses have never been well paid!

      If you do not have knowledge of the 'coal face delivery' you should not be able to 'experiment' with new managerial ideas. You need to introduce new ideas that acknowledge real experience and accommodate new learning. Yes change has to be pushed but not by people who have no real understanding of what the job entails.

      In particular this government's policies have adversely affected far too many people starting, with those that could be rehabilitated and more seriously the public who have not been adequately protected.

      Delete
    4. It doesn't help that the training for PQIPs and PSOs is a lottery and not remotely consistent. PQIPs are not expected to be auxiliary members of trained staff on the cheap but they're constantly being used in this way- no wonder why so many leave. They're supposed to be 'protected.' This is why they end up undertaking co-working high risk cases because POs are so exhausted from their own caseload, but this comes at further risk to themselves, the organisation and the public at large. It takes time to be risk literate and many don't know how to articulate risk and then action it on Delius or convey it to a manager. But it's not their fault- it takes time. SPOs are also expecting POs on high caseloads to be mentors to give the SPOs a break- it's 1.9 off a WMT- a drop in the ocean and it's basically free on top of a long working week. If the service is not prepared to deal with the nubs and constant feedback of being overworked then we will see more resignations. Those in authority can't keep promising 'tomorrow, tomorrow' like little orphan Annie. We need vast and tangible change with a view for that to be a radical change in culture to give probation purpose. And, please, stop with the bloody form filling and NSIs- it's mind-numbing and soul-draining. We're not data entry clerks.

      Delete
  6. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/damian-hinds-returns-to-dfe-as-minister-of-state/

    who replaces waffling hinds then?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From Twitter Danny Shaw:-

      "Another day, another Prisons Minister.
      @DamianHinds has been moved from @MoJGovUK to Education, ending a deeply uncomfortable spell during which jails ran out of places.

      Laura Farris & @GarethBaconMP have joined MoJ - but unclear who will take on tricky prisons brief."

      Delete
    2. Gareth Bacon is a member of the Conservative Common Sense Group which must rank as an oxymoron.

      Delete
  7. I agree with you @ 08.55. Unfortunately it is worse in our area where the PDU head decided to scrap PQUIP mentoring and the miniscule reduction in caseload it brought with it in favour of loading up PO's with more cases under the guise that we PO's were too busy to mentor. That may be the case, but we felt it an investment in the future of probation and hated seeing trainees at all levels PO and PSO floundering so we continued to do this on the QT. Luckily I am off and counting the days despite the hand wringing at the loss of experienced staff and I am over 20 years in. I am absolutely done.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There are a series of adverts for qualified probation officers on Civil Service Jobs,’ this morning, presumably in an attempt to lure back those who have left.
    They advertise a salary range from 30 to 38k which is piffling when compared to like professionals, but that is what the union negotiated in a three year deal let’s not forget.
    I know from previous such campaigns that if you apply to return and were previously at the top of the scale, you would be re-instated somewhere near the middle. Hardly a great incentive to volunteer to be flogged to death and dictated to by people who really don’t understand the job

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm unsure why a presumption against short sentences and the release of prisoners 18 days early represents a sudden increase to probation caseload.
    Anyone given a short sentence is destined for a year's probation once released. So short sentence or not probation is getting them anyway. No short sentences they're directed to probation as an alternative. Either way, they're ending up on probation books.
    If a prisoner is released 18 days early they're going to probation. It doesn't really make a difference if they're sent to probation on the first of the month or the nineteenth of the month, probation is getting them anyway.
    There's just too many people being shoved through the probation service.
    The solution isn't trying to work out a way to accommodate a greater capacity which seems to be the MoJ focus, the solution lays with reducing the flow of people into the probation service.
    Could start with removing the TR introduced 12mth mth and under cohort?

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  10. PSS has been a disaster, punters are never free of supervision & any reoffending whilst subject to supervision is an aggravating factor in the new offence, so PSS worsens the situation on an almost logarithmic scale. As I am now a 40 year veteran could I remind the readership of this blog that voluntary after care went the way of all things because the punters didn't want it and we couldn't staff it - even in the 1980s. I suggest that if we are to be stuck with PSS it should be cut to 3 months. Any meaningful resettlement work can be commenced in that period. The shorter the period of supervision the less time there is for breach and reoffending and therefore no exacerbation of sentence. Shorten the intervention also equals more resource capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. From Twitter:-

    "Somehow staff need to be organised to mitigate the pressures of the job as it now is. Many have heard of 360 degree appraisals (etc). Staff must provide regular, consistent, evidenced based feedback to managers & priorities recorded.

    I’d strongly advise this model is adopted by managers with their senior managers, it needs to be a strong communication channel. Senior Managers should similarly report to HQ and onto Ministers! Even though the 🤡’s you’ve had won’t be able to cope!

    Don’t suffer the pressures, don’t try and make individual judgements which could come back at you, record & feedback the clear risks & what is decided to be actionable."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From Twitter:-

      "It’s easier said than done and will require some thought to produce metrics which feedback the practical realities of trying to do the job in the present circs. As prof’s you could suggest priorities, but obtain agreement on the possible consequences. Hope this helps."

      Delete
    2. This model of appraisal has been used in my area previously and even with some pretty assertive staff everyone caved when assessing their line managers. It is not honest and can’t be with the power imbalance.

      Delete
  12. Do we know who is the Prisons and Probation Minister. Does anyone care?... not like there is any sort of crisis in this department, Move along please

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh goody goody gum drops. Quick wiki browse
    On 22 October 2021, Laura Farris opposed a bill to prevent employers from firing employees and rehiring them on worse terms and conditions.
    Gareth Bacon was among the signatories of a letter to The Telegraph in November 2020 from the "Common Sense Group" of Conservative Parliamentarians. The letter accused the National Trust of being "coloured by cultural Marxist dogma, colloquially known as the 'woke agenda'".

    ReplyDelete