Wednesday, 1 November 2023

Latest From Napo 239

It's been some time since I published one of these Napo updates and in fact the last was in July. They come out at reasonable intervals, but rarely seem to contain anything much of general interest, which might surprise some people, especially given the recent outpourings of angst on here. It's almost certainly noteworthy that the previous post has been viewed 2,385 times and attracted 69 comments. Some might feel a valid question would be why there's no longer a regular blog post from the General Secretary? Failing him, why not from anyone else on the 'top table'?  

Anyway, the following is from the latest mailout dated 30th October:-

Chesterfield Inquest conclusion

The Coroner’s Inquest into the deaths of Terri Harris, Lacey Bennett, John Paul Bennett, and Connie Gent – who were all tragically murdered in September 2021 – concluded on 23 October 2023


Staff may have read the information provided by Kim Thorden-Edwards, Chief Probation Officer on the Probation Service intranet site. It references the Coroner identifying a number of failings that were made by the Probation Service. As Napo has done in the past, we are committed to supporting any of our members who may find themselves involved in legal proceedings of this nature and this was the case before, during (and will continue to be the case) following this inquest.

At the recent Napo Annual General Meeting in Nottingham a motion from London Branch was carried as follows:

SFOs – Corporate Responsibility Not Scapegoating

This AGM supports the Napo Workloads campaign but feels it does not go far enough. AGM notes Serious Further Offence investigations are increasing in number and we are seeing more result in disciplinary action.

While increased workloads due to serious staff shortages are noted as a mitigating factor there is a noticeable lack of the Organisation being willing to accept Corporate Responsibility. This is leading to front line staff being scapegoated in the name of accountability.

This AGM believes it is almost impossible for staff to undertake all of the duties required to safely manage or assess people in the community with the current workloads and staff shortages.

This AGM calls on Napo to:
  • raise awareness of the impact of staff shortages on serious further offences, highlighting this is increasingly through unsafe working practices;
  • negotiate with the employer the circumstances in which Corporate Responsibility will be applied.
AGM further calls on Officers and Officials to take action up to and including industrial action to achieve this.

This is work that is already in hand, and we will continue to press our campaigning activities at national level and via the media and Parliament as evidenced in numerous examples that have been highlighted to our members. We will also maintain pressure on the employer to support their staff and we stand together in solidarity with any member who finds themselves in such a position following a serious case review.

In such circumstances you are urged to contact your local branch for support in the first instance who will seek appropriate advice from Napo HQ.

Helen Banner and Ian Lawrence

--oo00oo--

Operation Protect Fringe at AGM – writing to Jim Barton at HMPPS

As part of Operation Protect, we held a fringe meeting with Jim Barton of HMPPS, regarding members’ extreme workloads. Jim was happy for those present to follow up from this fringe and email him further questions. If you were there and have more questions to raise as a result of the discussion and as part of further meetings and our campaign Operation Protect, please also email us at info@napo.org.uk and we can continue to follow up on important queries.

24 comments:

  1. Operation Protect: we are now often in the situation where we have more in common with our clients than our employers. The machinery grinds on requiring us to fulfil often meaningless tasks and expectations beyond our capacity to do them, and to require us to require that of our clients. So two humans in the face of the relentless machine work out together as best they can, how to navigate through the process unscathed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I see that Napo Gen Sec Ian Lawrence and CPO Kim Thornden-Edwards are keynote speakers at a Westminster Legal Policy Forum conference "Next steps for the probation system in England and Wales"
    ("System" Grrrrrrr)
    Given the CPO's lacklustre performance at Napo AGM and the Gen Secs seeming inability to pick a solid fight and get the workforce behind him, I am not sure it'll be worth the £260-that-I haven't-got ticket, but unable to witness it, it will be hard to hold either to account

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no he will be sucking up like a new born lamb makes me sick . The incompetant and the inept privateer.

      Delete
  3. Well done great to see your blog the real history of assault on probation has reading figures you should be rightly proud. It indicates to me at least a third of the probation staff or management or leadership still read this for staff mood and update on latest issues. Nothing from that nonsense over at pi. As for Napo a report written by two full time officials could only produce a document where three quarters of it was a motion drafted by someone else. The detritus of the general secretary a contempt of those who pay his wages is to simply do nothing says all it needs to me. As for the chair poor showing of her duties. Hardly surprising as any model to follow was slumped to the deck under foolish Tom rendon. The filling dug deeper and never surfaced intellectually above the horizon. All time lows for Napo. The document offered nothing to members on the issues. Workload health safety . Sickness rates . Pay overtime premium . Unpaid work and the early release impacts. Equality protections. Representing members . You name it Napo don't know about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Easily agreeable the first few lines 18:01 . The rebellion could not exist on any other platform in my mind. This recording places the blog editor rather uniquely as competent newscaster editor and think tank with a conscience. What would Nps become without the critical reviews here. Definitely much worse immidiatly.

      Delete
  4. Have some sympathy for the poor napo mouse...once every three months or so it comes bravely scurrying to the defence of the membership but then spots some truly frightening predators that are circling menacingly. With an inaudible squeak it will run back to it's lined nest and wait until it can summon up the courage to venture out safely again in a few more months time....poor napo mouse

    ReplyDelete
  5. It’s called a vote of no confidence. Call for it. Back it. Re-elect with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The top table of collaborators just reappointed him without a members vote. No ratified job yet the AGM passed and the decision to deselect Amy other applicant was not raised or challenged. Napo members deserve the leader they have he reflects their apathy. Useless is as the members desire so they can blame rather than own. The members of Napo in the past helped evict the last great vocal activists the national reps and good speakers. Napo sunk itself. If the general secretary speaks who is representing. No branch structures. No genuine members informative. He does his own narrative despite after 15 years he still doesn't understand the job of general secretary. He is napos Boris Johnson.

      Delete
  6. 08:04, A bit like the probation service itself, I fear NAPO is beyond redemption.
    Again, a bit like the probation service, it could never make up its mind as to its true identity. Was it ever a Trades Union, was it ever a professional authority?
    In my mind, NAPO is finished. Place the blame where you will, there are plenty of candidates - for my money, the present incumbent bears much of the responsibility - but there are others, including the members themselves who have remained dormant and silent both internally and externally of the organisation.
    In reality, the future probably involves NAPO amalgamating ( i.e. being rescued by some other entity and becoming a junior partner) or splitting into two sections, and members deciding do they want to defend terms and conditions and confront bullying managers, or becoming a think tank and mulling over future direction and policy. I don’t think you can have both in one organisation.
    I would also endorse the other 8:04 comment about a vote of no confidence. It is long overdue and calls for the current GS to fall on his sword have been ignored.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ridding Napo of lawrence will cost the union at least 300k he would welcome that handshake. Napo members elected his friends to roles they then protected him. Napo highly paid staff now only act as regional link officers sparsely. They don't have any real roles now and they will keep paying staff while they have enough member funding. They have no offices now and meetings are internet based. Napo is dysfunctional and authority know it. They are welcomed because they pose no threat level and only support management by mely mouthed cowardly Lawrence speak. Where are workloads disputes fair practice complaint employment tribunals legal support. there is none . He has no success to be proud of ego over substance hype of delivery a figurehead of shame way under par for all staff.

      Delete
  7. Under the Health and Safety act 1974, the employer has a duty of care to its staff, and we have a duty of care to ourselves, to ensure that we have a safe working environment. To protect ourselves we need to call in sick and report stress on the portal, and request stress risk assessments to be recorded and reviewed. If managers do not follow this process then the Foreseeability Notice that NAPO created, should be used more frequently as a preventative measure. My understanding is that the organisation / employer is data driven, and we need to provide this evidence to NAPO for them to present and and challenge at meetings, so they can address the workloads, trauma and stress within the organisation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Any Napo members contributing to this whinge.... there is a napo campaign network meeting coming up 30th November. Get off your angsty keyboards and take your angst to work. My branch is fit and well thank you and we are working our socks off. If your branch isnt functioning well, get to a meeting, call a meeting, and step up.
    We are who we are, and we've got who we've got. If you dont want to do anything about anything, by all means carry on here, or down the pub with anyone who cares to listen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok what is your area how many attend your branch and how often are you hold meetings. . What's your quoracy .Do you see your management do you negotiate with them over time and workloads abuses in your area. Have you a branch supported strategy. Does your management take heed of anything you put to them have you any branch reports to your members of the campaigns and activities of your reps. Have done any local representations to protect staff. Are you protecting the staff members on sick leave really what are you working so hard on when everyone else is 150% over .

      Delete
    2. What are YOU doing? Happy to have a constructive conversation and offer support

      Delete
    3. If branches are not doing this stuff they are not functioning simple. Noone needs to chat we need facilitating to organise. Napo threw all our branch constitutions out and your not able to deliver union activity. Not able to disagree lodge a dispute or protect . You don't have facility time training or a genuine ability to protect terms. Please tell us this is not correct.

      Delete
    4. I hear your frustration and anger. Lord knows we have every reason to be angry. But I'm going to go back to my question. What are you contributing? I'm a busy napo rep and I've had a pretty good run getting those insane absence warnings overturned, complaints resolved, a career saved here and there some reasonable adjustments in the face of unreasonable expectations,better health and safety measures. Of course we are swimming against the tide. More than a decade of austerity and wicked anti-union legislation. My suggestion is keep the frustration and internal politics of napo internal and do your bit. Against the tide as we are, napo is still highly regarded in many arenas, not least because of the thuddingly authorative Journal. Don't waste space and opportunity undermining us in public

      Delete
    5. Local repping is hard work when you deal with the faceless sscl and their collaborate friends. You are not a functioning branch however nor are you negotiating local terms. Like I said activism for branches gone your downstream save the victims. No fixing what Lawrence has achieved.

      Delete
  9. The branch model which functioned well under boards then trusts has been systematically dismantled . Not just the employers shifting their commitment to jncc but because Napo surrendered the white book. This meant Lawrence and co had to try and fill the gap and now have no proper function. This disaster has destroyed branch member rank and file involvement. Napo is not a democratic union a professional association or affiliated to any body.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought last week was bad but this week was even more punishing. I literally don't stop, don't have time for even a quick lunch most days and often come home dehydrated and completely exhausted physicallyand emotionally. It feels inhuman at times. It reminds me of the photos of firefighters or NHS workers during pandemic, hunkered down exhausted and having a rest, except there is no rest and no recognition of how hard pushed we are. No one seems to notice or care. It has become normalised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right @ 18:13 and last night at 9.25pm I fired up the computer, and sent the email resigning with immediate effect. It has been a long time coming. I awoke this morning, not feeling a sense of jubilation or a desire to turn cartwheels of joy as one would expect but a profound sense of rage and sadness at the whole sorry state of affairs and the disgraceful way staff are treated. More surprising was the reaction of friends and family who were rejoicing that at last I had got rid. You are worth more than your situation which sounds unsustainable and your health and family cannot replace you or you them or gain back precious time. This machine will roll relentlessly on without us. A fact. sad but true. I think I was actually bereaved and grieving for a while there, but where one door shuts...... and I send you every good wish.

      Delete
    2. Good luck to you and well done brave and respect all you have said . I know you can only protect yourself and you have sent a clear message immediate effect means they won't pay you notice period so that is resounding . All the best ..

      Delete
  11. 19.46 thank you and I wish you all the best in your new ventures. Probation's loss will be someone else's gain.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's only after some hesitation, even trepidation, that I have decided to "enter the room" with a comment where there is so much anger and asperity. The sincerity behind the very real crises and detriments suffered by workers is undoubted. What troubles me however is the level of invective aimed at our own employees through ill considered and often ill informed venting. Ridiculous speculation, some reaching conspiracy style rhetoric, only serves to aggravate matters further.
    I have witnessed at first hand the damage done to probation employees of all designations. It is dangerous and callous to treat working people, or anyone at all, with such disregard and disrespect.
    However some people on here appear to fail to understand that Napo employees are also to be respected and referred to with basic courtesy and dignity. The collapse in the Branch structure in some areas is due to a matrix of reasons. The bloated workloads in practice serve to limit the time and energy necessary to fulfil Branch positions. As has been observed in this thread much of the work has needed to be assumed by national officials (representation at the early stages of discipline, capability and health procedures for example) That work comes on top of their standard duties and does not replace it. Accusations of self-interest as the primary motivation for Napo staff is wildly misplaced.
    As a trade union we are committed to the causes of working people. Please, can we be consistent in this.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 14:11 a lot of us have great respect for NAPO staff. It’s the incredibly poor leadership from the general secretary that has caused outrage. Reps work their butts off trying to defend staff. Most people understand that. However, leadership is weak and things won’t get better until it improves. The anger is because staff feel let down by him. He has a voice and doesn’t use it. When he does it’s just words and no action.

    ReplyDelete