Thursday 25 February 2021

Latest From Probation HQ

Here we have edited highlights from episode 9 of the Probation Changes Bulletin published yesterday:-

1. Introduction from Amy Rees, Director General of Probation and Wales

Welcome to the latest bulletin, reporting on key updates and progress across our three probation programmes – reform, workforce and recovery. A key milestone for the Reform Programme is the recent publication of our Target Operating Model for the future probation services in England and Wales. This document sets out our plans for how probation will be structured and how services will be delivered from June 2021, when we come together with our CRC colleagues as a new probation service. You will read more on this from Jim Barton below. Ian Barrow also provides updates on our progress with our recovery and workforce programmes.

Clearly, we continue to be focused on our response to coronavirus, but the plans we put in place some months ago remain robust and offer the agility for each region to adapt to changing circumstances. I want to reiterate my enormous thanks to people across the probation service for their continued resilience, adaptability and sheer hard work as they respond to the challenges we face. It is down to this incredible commitment that we continue to deliver our core critical services.

2. Update from Jim Barton, SRO, Probation Reform Programme

Work continues at pace on our planned probation reforms and we remain on track for the safe and stable transition to the Unified Model by June 2021. As we look to this date, we have just published our Target Operating Model for the future of probation services, which sets out how the probation services will be run from 26 June 2021. You can find the full document here along with an executive summary.

This replaces the draft version published in March and provides further detail on key aspects of the new model, including further detail on announcements made in June 2020 around bringing defined interventions into the new probation service.

Updated National Standards, which come into effect in June, have also been published to enable us to outline how we will support the new operating model. National Standards set out expectations for staff about what work activity needs to be completed to support effective delivery.

We are investing an additional £155m a year to establish a strengthened unified probation service that keeps the public safe, supports victims of crime and gives the right rehabilitative support to address the often-complex causes of offending. This will support a Criminal Justice System that commands public confidence.

Our operating model will unify probation services, bringing into one place Sentence Management as well as the delivery of Unpaid Work, Accredited Programmes and Structured Interventions, taking the best of current CRC and NPS practice. In this way, we will simplify delivery, making it easier for those we work with and giving us greater control of staff and resources to be able to deliver reform.

In Sentence Management our focus will be on strengthening the Probation Practitioner’s relationship with those they supervise. We will help Probation Practitioners use the right key skills, activities and behaviours to achieve the most effective outcomes and enable those under our supervision to make positive changes to their lives. This will include more consistent management and delivery of sentence plans, better assessment and management of risk and more balanced caseloads and an improved case allocation process to support this.

For Unpaid Work, Accredited Programmes and Structured Interventions we want to drive up completion rates and deliver better outcomes. The model therefore puts an increased emphasis on making placements and programmes available locally, making improvements to the assessment and induction process, more regular reviews of active cases and ongoing professional development for staff delivering interventions.

Importantly, our operating model allows us to continue to utilise specialist service providers across our regions to deliver the most appropriate support to those under our supervision. The Dynamic Framework is our mechanism to source Commissioned Rehabilitative Services from expert organisations at a local and regional level. These will provide tailored support and address areas of need associated with reoffending or which provide the stabilisation that many of those under our supervision need.

To support these changes, we have implemented new regional probation leadership structures, reorganising probation services around 12 regions in England and Wales, each overseen by a Regional Probation Director and supported by their senior leadership teams. This will enable more local accountability, partnership working and delivery of services that more closely meet individuals’ diverse needs.

In recognition that our probation staff are critical to the delivery of the new model, we are investing in the skills, capabilities and ways of working they need to do their jobs to the highest standard. The model reflects the importance of modernising our estate and technology so that staff and those under our supervision have access to physical spaces that create positive working environments and we have more efficient digital systems that better capture information to enable more effective decision-making.

Despite the challenges of Covid-19 we have maintained a robust probation system thanks to the dedication and hard work of our staff and we are on track to start to deliver these much-needed reforms from 26 June 2021. I remain determined to ensure that the transition to the future system is implemented smoothly and with minimal disruption for staff or services.

We will continue to keep you informed of changes as they happen. As ever your input and feedback are invaluable.

3.1 PQiP learners

We are committed to recruiting 1,000 trainee Probation Officers in 2020/21, with 443 already started in July 2020 and further intakes planned for 2021. We are increasing our recruitment of new trainee probation officers to 1,500 in the new financial year of 2021/22.

We have also recruited 50 existing Probation Service Officers across four regions who will have the opportunity to follow an accelerated course to qualify as Probation Officers. This is an exciting opportunity for career progression for junior staff in the NPS.

In April we’ll be starting our next PQiP recruitment campaign with the aim of hiring 1,500 new probation officers during 2021/2022. I’d like to encourage anyone who is interested in applying or finding out more to visit our website.

4. Update from Ian Barrow, SRO, Recovery Programme

We continue to live and work under national restrictions across England and Wales and operate under the exceptional delivery model arrangements that we put in place last year for probation work. As Amy mentions, all our regions are using the range of supervision approaches we have available to decide how services can be delivered based on local circumstances.

Some aspects of our work remain temporarily paused and we are consulting with regions and CRCs on how and when we can safely re-introduce these. We have continued to deliver unpaid work on a restricted basis and one to one accredited programmes where possible. Our Approved Premises remain open and testing for staff and residents is being delivered.

Following a successful trial with staff testing in some of our offices, we are now preparing to roll out testing across a further 40 offices, before expanding across all our viable probation offices soon after. I’d like to thank everyone who has contributed to setting up and implementing testing across our offices and Approved Premises.

19 comments:

  1. "Every government spins their message. But if we fall unthinkingly for the spin, the fault isn’t with them. It’s with us."

    Wise words from Moustafa Bayoumi, professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York


    He also writes: "This week, the Biden administration did the unthinkable. It reopened a Trump-era detention site for migrant children. The detention center, a reconverted camp for oil field workers in Carrizo Springs, Texas, is expected to hold 700 children between the ages of 13 and 17, and dozens of kids have already arrived there.... “unaccompanied teens sent to the Carrizo Springs shelter will not be allowed to leave the facility”... The camp’s operation will be “based on a federal emergency management system”, where “trailers are labeled with names such as Alpha, Charlie and Echo”, names which are commonly used in military detention practices."

    Perhaps the ex-president was more up-front when he said shit like "lock the little bastards up in cages" as compared to the liberal "Flowers, butterflies and a rosy banner saying ‘Bienvenidos’" which apparently decorate the child detention site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of Trump's repeated claims was that the detention of migrant children began under Obama, which I understand to be the case, but because he lies about so much else I guess a lot of people didn't believe it.

      Delete
    2. My understanding is that the centres - which were opened by Obama - were for unaccompanied children who had crossed the border, and that they were held there until a foster/care provider family had been identified in the US; and ultimately the aim was to trace any blood family with a view to the children being returned.

      The centres were not built/designed to hold children who had been forcibly separated from their families by US ICE officials per the Trump policies.

      Delete
  2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/implementation-and-use-of-oasys-sexual-reoffending-predictor-osp-policy-framework

    New forms to fill in

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The OASys Sexual reoffending Predictor (OSP) is the new actuarial risk assessment tool now being used by HMPPS to assess all adult males convicted of a current or previous sexual or sexually motivated offence.

      Actuarial risk assessment tools form an important part of the risk assessment process of those convicted of sexual offences. Until now, Risk Matrix 2000 has been the main actuarial risk assessment tool used by HMPPS.

      Why change?
      As an organisation, it is essential that we review our risk assessment tools to ensure they are as up-to-date, reliable and robust as possible. OSP has been proven to be more predictively valid than RM2000 in assessing the likelihood of sexual reconviction in adult males and will therefore serve to support our risk assessments of this cohort.

      Furthermore, the joint HMIP thematic inspection into Management and Supervision of Men convicted of Sexual Offences (January 2019) recommended that ‘assessment tools were streamlined’. The reason for this is to allow us to have one holistic risk assessment with all
      relevant information incorporated into it, which will make it easier for OMs to ensure the actuarial
      score is used to inform the overall risk assessment, as set out in the Risk of Serious Harm Guidance (2020).

      The benefits of OSP include:
      • OSP is already being calculated within RSR
      • It produces two scores:
      o OSP/C which predicts the likelihood of proven reoffending for a sexual/sexually motivated contact offence, and

      o OSP/I which predicts the likelihood of proven reoffending for an offence relating to possessing or downloading of indecent images of children
      • Calculating OSP requires less professional judgment and is therefore less prone to error
      • No formal training is required
      • OSP will be recorded in one place and will automatically be re-calculated every time the OASys assessment is reviewed

      Please note - There is currently no actuarial risk assessment tool available for women. OSP is not designed for use with women convicted of sexual offences, it must therefore not be calculated or used and no OSP scores will be displayed in an assessment where the individual’s gender has been recorded as female.

      Delete
    2. This has been sold as "it will make your life (on OASys) easier, like the ARMS assessment. The issue is that we spend our lives on OASys. OASys is becoming a monster. It is not fit for purpose and its sucking up millions of quid in perpetuity

      Delete
    3. Tired, really exhausted. Ony tomorrow to get through for two days of respite. Lord knows how staff with kids are coping with this. The divide between the organisational aspirations and what it is actually like on the ground is a chasm. They can deep polishing the turd that is the OASys system and sending out chirpy emails about wellbeing until their heads explode for all I care. How I hate the organisation I work for, while simultaneously loving my comrades and caring about my clients and their victims.

      Delete
  3. Why are these c@#ts still being paid top dollar to spout this horses**t? Hundreds of millions wasted over the past 7 years. No discernable pay increase for 12 years. And these a%$*#@es still spinning the f$#k out of the shambles they've created. Criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The links to the new National Standards all seem to go to the TOM.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Follow the money:

    "A UNION says that Cumberland Infirmary support staff who will today take strike action over not receiving unsocial hours pay are ‘flabbergasted’ that no solution has yet been found to the dispute... they are furious that they have not received enhanced pay rates for working nights and weekends but any NHS staff who may be drafted into to do their work during the strike would get extra pay for working the same unsocial hours.

    The unions say the staff were promised the better pay rates more than a decade ago as part of a national pay deal ­— but this was never been honoured... The 150 staff involved were employed by Interserve, but now work for Mitie, after the firm took over the facilities management contract...

    ... Unison regional organiser David Atkinson said both unions want an investigation into the whereabouts of a “substantial sum” of money which North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Trust says was passed on to fund unsocial hours pay."

    Sounds a bit like the EVR money destined for staff that was 'disappeared' by the CRCs - with the government's blessing, no less!

    Did we hear the probation union cry "foul!" ? Er, no.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not want to get defensive of CRCs here and apologise if anyone would take such a view.

      If your company hard large sums of ready money that could be kept then they would wouldn't they. The CRCs had no staff duty or care to long standing colleagues. They saw it as a paid management activity. They managed because the old guard chief officer grades allegedly failed as did all the acos fail to reduce offending. I know I know all said before and I don't hold too much of a position on this.

      Most cpos took a large one and helped sell us out. The appalling staff transfer agreement was rushed through last minute with Napo selling us out further for a mere tuppence on the notion it would protect staff. Napo did not have the proposed policy checked in law. The agreement could not hold a drip let alone any water. It was Napo and the union's gaff not to see it tested. Nor did Napo take any cases to law. The GS either too stupid or scared to have his bodged agreement scruitinised in any test case. It is known to some the GS subverted claims So Napo took no disputes forward. The losers were the leavers and why some defence of the CRCs here is where most of the leavers signed their compromised offes and sold their entitlements down the river. Also any legal right to claim.

      Napo have a lot of defecicits to answer for but none more than the defecient one in charge.

      Delete
    2. Its easy to point fingers at those who signed the severance deals but for more than a few 'leavers' there were intolerable circumstances in play, not least being the deafening silence & complicit inertia of NAPO. An independent barrister's view was that there was a good case to win, but asked if I could afford &/or survive many years' delay while the CRC's corporate legal team stonewalled the case.

      The Trust CEO wrote to staff to tell them if they appealed their NPS/CRC allocation he would regard it as tendering notice to quit.

      For those shafted to the CRC, the CRC saw the opportunity to excise the expensive, knowledgeable & so-called 'difficult' staff they had been landed with (in our area it was a carefully choreographed exercise, a super-shafting).

      After the redundancy letters were issued in the July the CRC CEO gave private, verbal, off-the-record "advice" about severance to a number of individuals; mine, and several colleagues', went like this:

      "Take what's on offer & go. Its as good as you'll get, and if you don't? We'll make sure you'll be leaving with nothing after we dismiss you. And you know we will find something."

      If there had been a strong union & cohesive staff group it might have been possible to prove a case of constructive dismissal across the board. Sadly the union was in the pocket of 'the centre', staff were terrified of losing jobs & sources of income, the bullying & threats were successfully expedited while the bullies-in-chief were richly rewarded.

      Reap what you sow.

      Delete
    3. I was not pointing the finger so to speak. Anyone who signed either felt as you describe and with no corner to fight from took the offer. In an area not so far from anywhere a few key players mounted a proper strategic fight back yet still many staff fearful took a deal. Yes for many of them there is a lack of sympathy. However those stuck it through got their full monies pensions unreduced and saw success. No one applauds that group Napo hide their shame but those with the talent made cases too risky and were paid in full. Why because they subverted any information from Napo command. The only way It was possible but those who signed like it or not just blinked first . The CRC owners are the scum thieves and no one was pointing fingers here just telling it like it was. If you signed off your terms then of course it will still be raw . They just stole people's earnings and for that it was and remains the complete failure of the Berk in charge of napo as stated he subverted members claims. No question. That means people had no choice because the management had the union inside their camp. They still do careerist facilitators their not trade unionists.

      Delete
  6. I actually want to scream. This job makes people ill. All they ever spout is resilience, it's how you perceive stress that's the issue, so on and so on. Before someone says get another job then the labour market does not give much hope and our so called transferable and professional skills not valued out there by many. That's how they trap us. It truly is a horrible place to work made bearable only by decent line managers and colleagues, unless you are not so lucky there either. Risk of harm and long term phychological damage what do they think burn out is!! When will they those at the top be held responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Its okay, breaking the law is "perfectly normal" according to the Justice Secretary:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/feb/26/justice-secretary-defends-matt-hancock-over-breach-of-law

    Robert Buckland says government often acts unlawfully and key thing is that it learns from court rulings:

    “getting something wrong is not the same as deliberately flouting the law”

    Sounds like something many people have said to me over the years - "it was a mistake, I didn't mean to do it"


    This is his second public shot at saying breaking the law is perfectly normal; the last time was over deliberately (sorry, inadvertently) breaking the law over Brexit .

    Wankers! Sorry Jim, but they are a sorry collection of said expletive. How can police, probation, courts do their jobs when the Justice Minister says breaking the law is perfectly normal:

    “The important thing is for the government to act according to the ruling of the court. When you read the [court] documents you see the lesson has been learned and it’s not a matter of the government trying to get away with it”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the same vein (and this applies to successive governments for the last 20 or so years:

      The maritime law tribunal of the United Nations last month ruled that Britain has no sovereignty over the Chagos Islands and blasted the UK Government for failing to give the territory back to Mauritius. Diego Garcia became a strategic American military airbase following a secret 1966 pact between the UK and US.

      “Britain has been professing, for years, respect for the rule of law, respect for international law, but it is a pity the UK does not act fairly and reasonably and in accordance with international law on the issue of the Chagos archipelago.” - Mauritian Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth

      And the UK's response, £6m in legal fees later?

      A Foreign Office spokeswoman said: “We have no doubt about our sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, which has been under continuous British sovereignty since 1814."

      Buckland: "The important thing is for the government to act according to the ruling of the court."

      All perfectly normal, of course.

      Delete
  8. The national chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales has called the decision not to prioritise officers in the next phase of the coronavirus vaccination programme a “deep and damaging betrayal” which “will not be forgotten”.

    ReplyDelete
  9. My book is out today https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B08XM1SVG1/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=the+leroy+campbell+case&qid=1614343093&sr=8-1

    ReplyDelete
  10. @12:57 will be an interesting read.

    ReplyDelete