As we know, the MoJ has a pretty good track record of making very poor decisions, wasting vast sums of public money and little aptitude for successful contracting. An article in the Justice Gap suggests another disaster is in the making down in Northamptonshire:-
As prisons face their biggest crisis, why are we spending £250m on a titan jail?
Next month will will see the public concentrating on the Tory leadership campaign and who will be next prime minister. Consequent upon that, there will likely be yet another justice secretary and prisons minister as the new incumbent of Number 10 rewards loyalty and bestows patronage as he or she forms their cabinet and ministerial team.
But quietly in Northamptonshire just off the A45 the first sod will be turned for a new 1,680 place Category C prison on the site of the old HMP Wellingborough. A £253 million deal has been agreed with a company called Kier for the design and construction of the jail. It will be our second biggest prison after HMP Berwyn near Wrexham which has a capacity of 2,106. It is all part of a faltering programme to replace many of England and Wales’ crumbling Victorian prisons.
Few would dispute that some of our jails are past their ‘best before’ date, expensive to run and sometimes, like HMP Dartmoor, in completely the wrong place. It is also recognised that there are design-related benefits within the prison environment if companies like Kier, working with the MoJ, consult properly before building rather than simply provide off-the-shelf warehouses. There is some excellent research now into this area from Roland Karthaus (here). And while a new-build can embed such learning from the start it is not impossible to apply some of their principles retrospectively.
But have the issues been adequately thought through? Have priorities been carefully balanced? What are the cost benefit comparisons when the MoJ still faces overall cuts.
There is no correlation between how new a prison is and how well it performs. Some old Victorian jails can be well run; some modern prisons have performed badly and not just on initial opening. If there is a pattern in prison performance it is that any jail, new or old, can fluctuate wildly in terms of how it treats prisoners. Flagships can sink and relationships can overcome crumbling brickwork. It is more about leadership and culture than modernity.
It is also apparent that closing jails that are not fit for purpose does not yield any financial dividend. George Osborne and Michael Gove were right to close Holloway, but an opportunity was missed to use at least some of the money from the sale of the site to fund the recommendations of the Corston Review and build women’s centres.
But at a time when the prison service faces the greatest crisis in its history and when funding is being continually reduced, is this the best way of spending a quarter of a billion pounds?
It will undoubtedly deliver the holy grail of lower cost per place. A mantra of ‘big is beautiful’ seems to dominate the agenda despite any evidence that large prisons deliver better outcomes. It will also, along with Berwyn, flagrantly disregard the Mandela Rules, the standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners and the recommendations of the Mubarek Inquiry into the tragic murder of a young man by his racist cell mate, in having enforced cell sharing. Is two people living together in a toilet, truly the hallmark of a 21st Century prison?
The new Wellingborough will deliver much for the local economy in terms of jobs and support services and it is no wonder that local MP, the outspoken Tory MP is all in favour. It is unlikely however that the new staff recruited locally will buck the trend of leaving within their first year of service.
But in what other ways will it contribute to a troubled prison system. We are over two years on from the opening of our last ‘titanjail’. Strangely HMP Berwyn still operates well below capacity while other jails are grossly overcrowded. The governor who opened the prison left under a cloud after barely 18 months in the job to be replaced by a (very able) governor/director from the Private sector. But why the country’s largest and most prestigious jail was not suitable for aspiring governors in the public sector has not been explained. Berwyn has yet to have its first inspection by the redoubtable HM chief inspector of prisons Peter Clark but even when it does it will be difficult to evaluate any success or failure in terms of its size, function and design until it has been operating at full capacity for some time. We also await the publication of the latest prison service estate review which began in 2017. Where does Berwyn 2 fit into it?
So it appears that prison service is following on from the probation service debacle with a philosophy of ‘carry on regardless’ and policy-based evidence.
How might £250m be better spent on a prison service in crisis? One of the biggest current issues is getting people out of prison. Sentences are getting longer and prisoners are serving ever greater periods of time within them. Those on indeterminate sentences are going ever longer beyond tariff and those on fixed sentences also struggle to satisfy the Parole Board that release is a viable option. There are strong arguments that long term incarceration is actually doing harm.
Nevertheless it is a given that most prisoners will get out eventually but it is that successful transition into the community that is proving so hard for the system. And it is not just the catastrophic part-privatisation of probation that is the problem. Yes, we need a probation service that assists and problem solves rather than just acts as a reactive community police force.
Yes, the charitable sector needs to be embraced rather than exploited. And yes we must overhaul the interventions industry, but all this could be better supported by a more imaginative prison estate with smaller localised, minimum security facilities in communities where there are opportunities for housing, employment and the potential to rebuild family relationships. We need facilities with an ethos of problem solving and reintegration rather than dumb incarceration. This was inherent in the report of Baroness Jean Corston over a decade ago. The principles of supportive accommodation in the community can apply equally to men and young people as to women.
If nothing else some of the £250m to finally implement the Corston Report would transform the lives of thousands of women and tens of thousands of children. If there is not the imagination or bravery to develop new and innovative transition facilities a few million to bail hostels and Approved Premises would go a long way to reducing the prison population.
There are plaintive cries for the abolition of short sentences but that is only practicable with better community alternatives. They are cheaper in the long term than custody but up front they require investment in skilled professionals and meaningful schemes with proven interventions. They don’t come cheap, but they are cheaper than titan jails.
The portents are not good. The good people of Northamptonshire will have their new jail despite some local resistance. They will be consulted on its name, (my money is on HMP Irchester) but is it really the best initiative in the current crisis.
John Podmore
John is a freelance criminal justice consultant. He worked in the prison service for 25 years and governed three prisons – Belmarsh, Swaleside and Brixton - and spent three years as an inspector of prisons
When I saw the title, I thought the article was about OMiC.
ReplyDeleteThis is yet another disaster in the making, coming soon to a prison near you!
You really have to wonder whats going on by giving Kier the contract. Its another private company about to go bust.
ReplyDeletehttps://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/business/2019/jun/03/kier-constrution-firm-shares-tumble-after-profit-warning?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQA#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fbusiness%2F2019%2Fjun%2F03%2Fkier-constrution-firm-shares-tumble-after-profit-warning
'Getafix
As it looks like the MoJ have picked another loser to build the prison, maybe there's a better name then HMP Irchester: HMP Grayling!
DeleteInvestors dumped shares in Kier Group on Monday after a profit warning from the construction and services company prompted comparisons with Carillion, its former rival that collapsed last year.
DeleteKier, which employs 20,000 people and works on large infrastructure projects such as HS2 and London’s delayed Crossrail , said its underlying full-year profits would be substantially below earlier forecasts, at about £129m rather than £169m.
Shares in the FTSE 250 company plummeted by 41% to 163.8p, their lowest level since February 1999.
This is less than half the 409p a share investors paid in December, when Kier launched a £264m emergency fundraising in an attempt to avoid the same fate as Carillion, the construction and services company that collapsed into insolvency in January 2018.
John Moore, a senior investment manager at investment firm Brewin Dolphin, said: “Kier is in a dark place. At the turn of the year the business set out its financials, trading performance and future plans as part of its unsuccessful rights issue, only to now say that this information was largely wrong. It has broken trust with investors, which does not bode well.
“Comparisons will be made with the likes of Carillion and, indeed, Kier has lots of complex long-term contracts and individual subsidiaries, which makes for an opaque situation where clarity and stability are desired. Where it goes from here is hard to say.”
Kier investors shunned December’s cash call, with only 38% of the shares taken up, and financial institutions had to step in. Its chief executive Haydn Mursell quit the following month after eight years in the job.
Hedge funds betting against the company have started to circle, with at least 4.8% of shares – equivalent to £21.4m before Monday’s share price fall – on loan to short sellers, who profit when the share price falls. London-based fund managers Marshall Wace and Kuvari Partners were the biggest winners, with shorts of about 1.5% each.
The slump dealt another blow to star investment manager Neil Woodford, who suspended shares in his LF Woodford Equity Income Fund after markets closed on Monday. His funds, which own more than 20% of shares in Kier, lost £37m during the day. Woodford bought shares in Kier as recently as 16 May, according to market disclosures.
Ian Forrest, an investment research analyst at the stockbroker the Share Centre, said: “The shares are now down 85% over the past year and there are clearly fears in the market that the company could be heading for the same fate as Carillion.”
Kier, which took on Carillion’s share of the HS2 high-speed rail project and took sole ownership of Highways England’s smart motorway programme in Cheshire, is also the UK’s leading regional builder of schools and hospitals. It said revenue growth at its regional buildings business would be lower than forecast.
In March, Kier reported a first-half pre-tax loss of £35.5m and flagged up problems in its highways, utilities and housing maintenance divisions. It has been hit by Highways England cutting back on maintenance spending and delays in telecoms companies’ fibre rollout.
As a result, the company said underlying operating profit for the year to 30 June would be £25m lower than City forecasts of £169m, with revenues unchanged from last year at £4.5bn.
In addition, Kier is taking a £15m hit from higher restructuring costs this year. The company’s chief executive, Andrew Davies, who joined from construction group Wates in March and had been lined up to take over at Carillion before the latter collapsed, is ramping up a programme to streamline Kier.
The group also warned on its debt. Analysts at stockbroker Peel Hunt had expected Kier to have £15m of net cash at the end of its year in June but now forecasts net debt of £60m. That is still down from £186m in June 2018, which partly reflects proceeds from December’s fundraising.
The group will announce the outcome of a strategic review on 30 July and is reportedly in talks to sell its housing maintenance arm.
Off topic but congratulations Jim. You have a mention in NPS News from Sonia Crozier in relation to the recent thread on the EPF. Does this mean we can now comment in person without fear or favour? It does mean we have an evidence base that our "movers and shakers" are on here. Once again, well done Jim and well done Sonia for at last ackowledging perhaps the most honest forum we have.
ReplyDeleteCan someone please cut and paste what it says? Cheers.
Delete"I'll still be diggin' on James Brown"
DeleteSo much for evidence-led practice....
ReplyDeleteAccording to the BBC's Danny Shaw, 118,000 offenders have taken part in rehabilitation programmes that have yet to be fully tested to see if they work @BBCNews learns. Courses for sex offenders and domestic abusers are among those which haven't been subject to an 'outcome evaulation'.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48516286
DeleteDear members
ReplyDeletePlease do not ignore this notice. The Napo South South Western Branch AGM is getting closer and as the Branch Secretary I would like you to give me your notice of attendance. This is so we can plan properly for the number of attendees and fully meet your lunch and drinks requirements. If you are planning to attend please let me know lunch requirements – vegetarian, vegan, allergies etc. Also please confirm if you can eat anything.
Below is a list of some of the burning issues facing you in your roles whether you are NPS or CRC staff. The news on re nationalizing has brought much speculation and the AGM at King’s Tamerton Community Centre on Thursday 27th June from 2.00pm will give you an opportunity to talk directly to the Trade Union leadership in the form of our guest speakers, the General Secretary & our link official and discover what the part you can play in this with the influence of our tireless, far -seeing & tenacious branch Chair.
We have the General Secretary Ian Lawrence & Link Officer Tania Bassett looking to engage all members with their needs for answers and debate on what ways we should be driving the staff transfer protections, your needs and values for the future. Also attempt to answer questions such as what happens to CRCs?, will staff feel able to transfer?, what of those that don’t want to go?, can others come back? Furthermore, recruitment is already here with the right people but what next? What will a re-amalgamated Probation Service look like? Will policies created by NOMS such as Attendance Management need to be modified?
For the GS specifically we want him to discuss:
The working links chapter. Highs & lows of the campaign from the dispute initiated, to their demise.
The workloads weighting campaign which will be the most important factor in reunification
The Seetec take over, MOJ duplicity and the faux promises
The HMIP report and NAPO predictions of that outcome.
Interventions, future CP Programmes into what oblivion ?
Napo relevance, should there be further separation ?
The fighting strength of the SSW branches determination and dedication to defend their employee rights.
For our Link Officer the following
Professional identity new NPS old CRC?
PSO futures in current expanded roles.
Restore role boundaries or reduce current CRC staff authority?
Future of non-qualified SPO roles
OMIC progress and what it means for members futures.
Any plans to challenge the unfair calculations of the WMT in NPS cases?
Progress on national negotiations for NPS Union facility time.
Highs lows of parliamentary campaigns and the breakthrough issues. NAO PAC reports. NAPO friendly ministers and Graylings legacy.
Finally for both to discuss the wider debate headings on
Terms conditions - harmonisation of employment
Careers - leapfrogging new salaries, spinal column
What might be the new national terms, how to apply.
Potentials for redundancies and new or existing EVR schemes to be funded pre unification.
Who returns back to public services whole or in part and whether enough could be left to see privatisation continue in any shape.
I hope to see as many of you there as possible and that those of you who do find it a thoroughly worthwhile afternoon
Paul Sabulis
Napo South South Western Branch Secretary