Thursday 28 February 2019

You Were Warned!

It all started with a remarkable comment:-
"Recent senior leadership conference for both NPS and CRC, David Gauke asked the room why nobody spoke up to warn the Gov that TR was a bad idea. Room apparently fell silent."
Then some Twitter exchanges:-

Jake Phillips - @jakephillips (Reader in Criminology @ SHU. Generally tweet about probation, criminology, politics...):

"If true, @DavidGauke might benefit from being reminded that probation officers actually **went on strike** in protest at the plans!!"
North East NPS, Stakeholder Engagement @NPSNESE replied:
"I think you have hit the nail on the head Jake...it isn’t true...that’s not what happened at all...and it was Rory Stewart not David Gauke...so totally incorrect..."
Whether it was David or Rory, I find it's an astonishing insight into politics; how decisions get made; how many of them are spectacularly wrong, but mostly how the average person down the pub or on the Clapham omnibus can spot the flaws in an instant. I mean, who'd have thought this:-  

Rail franchise model cannot continue, says review chief

Britain's rail franchise system no longer delivers clear benefits and cannot continue as it is, says the man leading a review of the network. Keith Williams said in a speech to industry leaders that firms are not adapting to changing consumer demands.

Rail franchising - contracting out passenger services - has drawn heavy criticism, with some contracts failing and customer complaints rising. The rail industry said it accepts that the status quo cannot continue. Mr Williams was appointed by the government last year to lead a "root-and-branch" review of the rail network.

Speaking in London, he said: "I have heard a great deal about the franchising model… driving growth in passengers and benefits to services. But with this growth, the needs of passengers have changed, whilst many of the basic elements of our rail system have not kept pace. Put bluntly, franchising cannot continue the way it is today. It is no longer delivering clear benefits for either taxpayers or farepayers."

The current "one-size-fits-all" approach to franchising does not work for every part of the country and every passenger, he said in the annual Bradshaw Address, named in honour of George Bradshaw, who developed the Bradshaw's Guide to the railways.

--oo00oo--

Or this:-

Outrage as help-to-buy boosts Persimmon profits to £1bn

Housebuilder Persimmon made a record-breaking £1bn profit last year – equal to more than £66,000 on every one of the homes it sold – with almost half of its house sales made through the taxpayer-funded help-to-buy scheme. The York-based builder, which sparked widespread public and political outrage for attempting to pay its former chief executive Jeff Fairburn a bonus of £110m, posted pre-tax profits of £1.09bn.

The huge profit – the biggest ever made by a UK housebuilder – means Persimmon banked £66,265 from every one of the 16,449 homes it sold last year. The average selling price was just over £215,000. The profit from each house it sells has nearly tripled since 2013, when the government introduced the help-to-buy scheme in an attempt to help struggling families buy their first home. Last year the company paid an average of just £31,536 for each plot of land, and spent £112,295 on actually building each home.

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat leader, accused Persimmon of “pinching their profits from the public purse”, adding: “Far from benefiting first time buyers, the major effect of help-to-buy is to drive up demand while having no effect on supply. The result is not help for those who need it, but a boost to the profits of big developers.” Cable demanded that the government immediately end the help-to-buy scheme and take action to crack down on “outrageous” executive pay. “This greed is coming at the expense of the public purse through the subsidies in help-to-buy,” he said. “Help-to-buy is a scam, enriching developers while forcing buyers off the ladder by pushing up prices.”

Greg Beales, the campaign director of the housing charity Shelter, said: “Persimmon represents everything that is wrong with the housebuilding system. The firm has generated huge profits from taxpayer subsidies whilst doing very little to help solve the housing crisis we face. “Piecemeal schemes such as help-to-buy have made the situation even worse by inflating house prices and giving big developers a leg-up – while doing next to nothing to help those most in need of a genuinely affordable home.”


--oo00oo--

Or that decimating youth services would not result in this:-

Gangs: 27,000 children in England say they are members - report

There are 27,000 children aged between 10 and 17 in England who identify as being part of a gang, according to a report by the Children's Commissioner. It adds that 313,000 children know a gang member - and, of those, 34,000 have experienced violent crime.

Commissioner Anne Longfield said gangs were using "sophisticated techniques" to groom children and "chilling levels of violence" to keep them compliant. The Home Office said it was "committed to protecting vulnerable children".

According to the report, gangs "set out to prey on vulnerable children" - and those suffering from mental health issues or abuse and neglect in their family life are particularly susceptible.

9 comments:

  1. Campaign launched to renationalise probation.

    https://www-mirror-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/probation-service-ownership-privatisation-failing-14063207.amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mirror.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk-news%2Fprobation-service-ownership-privatisation-failing-14063207

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A campaign to bring probation back into public ownership has been launched after one of the biggest private providers collapsed. It comes after the Mirror revealed how 225 people have been murdered by convicted criminals being monitored by firms since privatisation.

      The grim toll soared to 71 last year from 42 in 2015, the year after bungling Chris Grayling introduced the changes as then Justice Secretary – a rise of 60%. Private probation services have been in crisis since provider Working Links entered administration last week.

      The campaign has launched a petition calling on Justice Secretary David Gauke to bring probation into public control. Ellen Lees, of the group We Own It, said: “We’ve seen private companies repeatedly fail to meet targets, and downward pressure on working conditions of staff. The number of convicts committing a serious further offence while under probation has increased by 20%.”

      The campaign is backed by unions GMB, Unison and NAPO, and the New Economics Foundation think-tank. Unison’s Ben Priestley said: “Probation must return to public control to prevent further disasters.”

      Harry Fletcher, of the Victims’ Rights Campaign, said the rate of further offences committed was “appalling”. Nadine Marshall, whose son Conner, 18, was one of the 225, said: “It’s horrific.”

      Chief inspector of probation Dame Glenys Stacey warned this month: “The professional ethos has buckled under the strain of commercial pressures.”

      The petition can be found at weownit.org.uk/probation-petition.

      Delete
  2. I can only hope the campaign gains traction, that other media will promote the campaign & that Govt will listen. A previous poster echoes my fears, however:

    "my bone of contention is for our so called leaders who weren't for coming forward to denounce TR but appeared to welcome their new roles and salaries that came with the job - they're the ones I fear that we will remain stuck with along"

    The chameleons, the snake-oil marketeers & those with no shame will simply re-align themselves with any restructure. Their CVs will be impressive; but those CVs will not say "I remained silent" or "I actively enabled TR" or "I helped destroy Probation through my inaction". There is no trust or respect for those who lined their pockets at the expense of hundreds of colleagues' careers & at the expense of professional intervention for those sentenced to be supervised by Probation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interserve is to pay out more than three times its stock market valuation in fees to City advisers as part of a proposed emergency refinancing.

    The contractor’s £90 million in fees will go to the Rothschild investment bank, Numis, the broker, Ashurst and Slaughter and May, the legal firms, Grant Thornton, the accountant, and Tulchan, a public relations firm. The amount is equivalent to the cash the company will be left with if its £895 million restructuring is successful.

    It also has emerged that Interserve’s directors are not planning to share in investors’ pain. The directors — led by Glyn Barker, 65, the chairman, and Debbie White, 56, the chief executive — confirmed that they would not be subscribing to new shares in a £435 million fundraising,…

    The campaign may gain significant traction if Interserve collapse, and I think that is becoming more of a real possibility everyday.
    It would be hard for any SoS to continue with re-tendering contracts to large outsourcers if two of the biggest winners last time, Working Links and Interserve have gone bust leaving chaos behind.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who'd have thought that G4S or Serco would be allowed to keep their contracts after they were caught stealing taxpayer money, let alone be given new ones?

      Delete
  4. "David Gauke asked the room why nobody spoke up to warn the Gov that TR was a bad idea."

    Is Gauke accepting in that comment that he himself believes TR is a bad idea?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a suggestion that it was Rory Stewart not David Gauke, but either way it does indeed suggest one or both of these two government ministers seem to accept TR was indeed a bad idea - rather than the official line that it was 'ambitious and innovative'.

      Delete
  5. And on top of everything else, they have already got the next disaster in the pipeline.
    OMiC is being pushed through despite the government indicating that they are looking again at community sentences but if all the staff are in prisons, who will supervise order?
    Our leaders don’t seem to grasp that large numbers of staff don’t want to work in prisons ( can’t think why !) so they are resorting to bullying and underhand tactics including telling PQuips there will be no jobs for them in the community despite huge numbers of agency workers currently employed and over 1,000 vacancies nationwide.
    I hear horror stories from various sources, but I am sure that those who are experiencing the strong arm tactics are already getting a flavour of the poor management techniques and the command and control ethos which prevails.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You're no doubt already preparing today's piece!

    https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Transforming-Rehabilitation-Progress-review.pdf

    ReplyDelete