BR 29/2018
YP/KW
6th June 2018
To: NEC
Branch Chairs & Secretaries
Family Court SEC
Ian Lawrence, GS Candidate
Michael Rolfe, GS Candidate
CC: Napo Officers
Napo Staff
Dear Colleague
Nominations for General Secretary 2018
As you may know, the NEC interviewed the two candidates for the General Secretary position (Ian Lawrence and Michael Rolfe), when they met yesterday at Napo HQ.
Following the interviews, the NEC selected Ian Lawrence as their nominated candidate for the General Secretary position. Attached to this circular for your information (on page 2) you will find a full list of branches together with their chosen nomination.
The members ballot is the next stage of the selection process. The Electoral Reform Society (ERS) are managing this ballot - the ballot forms and candidate election statements will be dispatched by ERS and should start arriving with members from Friday 7th June. The deadline for receipt of ballot papers is Noon on Thursday 28th June. The result of the ballot will then be announced on Friday 29th June.
Yours sincerely
CHRIS WINTERS & YVONNE PATTISON
National Co-Chairs
2018 General Secretary Election
Nominations Received from Branches, Section & NEC
Both candidates seeked nominations from all branches.
Branch/Section : Date received : Nominee : Reason for not nominating
National Executive Committee 05/06/18 Ian Lawrence
Cheshire & Greater Manchester 04/06/18 None Low response – could not reach decision
Cumbria & Lancashire 04/06/18 Ian Lawrence
Durham Tees Valley
East Anglia 04/06/18 Ian Lawrence
East Coast 04/06/18 Ian Lawrence
East Midlands 25/05/18 None Low turnout and equal votes
Essex
Family Court Section 29/05/18 Ian Lawrence
The Four Shires 30/05/18 Michael Rolfe
Hampshire & Isle of Wight 01/06/18 Ian Lawrence
Kent, Surrey and Sussex 18/05/18 Michael Rolfe
London
The Mercia 04/06/18 Ian Lawrence
Merseyside
Napo Cymru 31/05/18 Ian Lawrence
Northern Ireland
Northumbria
South Southwestern 30/05/18 Ian Lawrence
South Yorkshire
Staffordshire West Midlands
Thames Valley 30/05/18 Ian Lawrence
West Yorkshire 04/06/18 Michael Rolfe
Western 04/06/18 Ian Lawrence
TOTALS:
Ian Lawrence 10 Branches & NEC
Michael Rolfe 3 Branches
No nomination agreed 2 Branches
No nomination received 8 Branches
Poor state of Napo with low vote turnout and some branches not submitting nominations. A shame as this is an opportunity to make changes in Napo starting at the top.
ReplyDeleteI’ve three questions for nominees.
1. Why has Napo been so quiet about CRC’s asking for more money and threatening to end probation contracts?
2. Why has Napo allowed NPS staff to be subject to police-style vetting, which is being justified as “required for access to Visor”, even though we do not need to use Visor?
3. Where is our pay rise?
FOLLOW NATIONAL EXEC RECCOMMENDATION VOTE IL: MORE OF THE SAME. DETERIORATION OF WORKING CONDITIONS/WORKERS RIGHTS/LACK OF REPRESENTATION TO PROTECT OUR PROFFESSIONALISM AND COMMITMENT TO ADDRESSING OFFENDING THROUGH ENGAGING SERVICE USERS
ReplyDeleteTURKEYS DONT VOTE FOR XMAS
COULD YOU REALLY PUT UP WITH THIS SHOWER FOR ANOTHER 5 YEARS?
I CAN'T AND WON'T HOWEVER FEAR FOR THOSE THAT REMAIN IN PROBATION
Anon 16:32 I was tempted to delete this contribution because shouting in capital letters strikes me as quite rude and any intended message is likely to be ignored as a consequence. As I'm in a fairly good mood, I'll let it pass on this occasion.
DeleteAnon 16:32 is right. “The NEC selected Ian Lawrence as their nominated candidate for the General Secretary position”. This is “MORE OF THE SAME” and because Napo has severely deteriorated under Ian Lawrence’s watch he should not have received this nomination. Have they no shame?
ReplyDeleteFor what might be the final time, napo members will reap what they sow. There is always choice, they just seem to be unable to choose well.
ReplyDeleteLedger & Lawrence have poor track records. Between them they have screwed the members' upside out. For the last 10 years or so napo the union has declined in status, efficacy & membership. Napo the professional body has disappeared. The profession itself has been sliced, diced, wrapped up in cheap contracts & handed over to the circling loan sharks - with napo's blessing. Unbelievable. Unforgivable. Unsustainable.
1743 ignore at your peril.Delete if you wish......sometimes the truth hurts. Capitals can also indicate a strong statement rather than SHOUTING. Appologies my phone was stuck on capitals however I couldnt be bothered to change.
ReplyDeleteThought this blog was free speech?
Sorry I agree with Jim. If someone sends me a shouty email I tend to delete it.
ReplyDeleteNapo was never really a union. It was more concerned with being a professional association. However this election might represent a change. Make the union cheaper. Forget the publications! If it’s a fiver a month people will join!
Let’s be honest neither candidate is ideal. Basing it on what little I know about the candidates plus a bit of life experience is that it’s much easier to send in a rottweiler for a fight than it is to put the fight into a lab. Too many leaders have had too little of the fight in them for my liking. Rolfe presents more fight in him than any potential leader for some time. Things need to be brought to a head. We cannot limp along in this way for much longer. We need some bloody publicity!
I’ve met so many officers over the years who were proper dinosaurs (meant as a compliment). People who stood up for themselves. Why do we keep electing weak leaders?!
If we refused to write PSR’s for a month we would soon get in the news! Everything would grind to a hault!
Before people didn’t care but the tide is turning. People are fed up of rubbish services. Violent crime is on the up and people want something done. Surely probation can be a big part of the solution?!
I do not understand how Cumbria and Lancashire Branch nominated anyone as it has not met as a Branch to cast any vote on this!I will be querying this with Branch Chair asap.
ReplyDeleteLikewise I do not know how London Napo made the decision ‘not to nominate’. There was no message or request for views sent from London Napo before or after this apparent decision, and it was not scheduled on the meeting agenda sent 14th May.
Delete