Sunday, 13 May 2018

General Secretary Election 2

So we now know who the two potential candidates are for General Secretary and the debate, on here at least, has well and truly begun. It's an absolutely vital decision for our union and we must all try and play a part in getting members involved. 

At this point may I voice a gentle reminder regarding comment moderation? Basically I much prefer people to be measured and considered, because anything else simply detracts from the power of any message trying to be conveyed and in extremis, gratuitously offensive contributions will have to be deleted. Please think carefully before pressing the 'publish' button. Thanks.       

Ok, enough of that and back to the matter in hand. Of course in any contested election such as this it's the incumbent who always enjoys some considerable advantages over any contender and so it was that the campaign started some time ago. We didn't cover it when published last December in Napo Quarterly for that very reason, but it's probably time to take a careful look at Ian Lawrence's pitch now:-    

Napo’s general secretary shares his views on the future of the union

NQ closes out the year with an in depth interview with Napo’s general secretary, Ian Lawrence. Ian, who plans to stand for re-election talks about conquering challenges, defending diversity and why investing in the future is vital for the survival of the union

It’s fair to say that Napo has faced some extraordinary challenges since you started as general secretary, what’s your view on these? 

I could write a whole book on some of them! My appointment as acting general secretary immediately followed what was an especially difficult time internally for Napo which, as a number of ex-members have told me, caused Napo reputational damage. 

After being elected as general secretary I was headlong into our campaign against Chris Grayling’s disastrous Transforming Rehabilitation proposals. This involved industrial action, in which Napo stood alone you will remember, and an attempt in the High Court to overturn Chris Grayling’s idealism which cost a lot of money and could have bankrupted Napo had we not taken the legal advice that we were given just days before the Judicial Review hearing. 

That latter decision was amongst the hardest I have ever been part of at any time in my career, but it was the right one despite it being obviously unpopular. My wider responsibility was to ensure that Napo could continue to do what it has done throughout its history as the beacon for professional standards and a union that has done its best to help its members collectively and individually. 

The split of the Probation service in the run up to TR was a pretty grim time for members as it was deliberately engineered by Government and senior MoJ people who saw our collectivism as a serious threat, to sap away the resolve of members. 

Soon after TR implementation came Graylings cynical attempt to ruin Napo financially by the removal of subscriptions at source (check-off) where we had to invest huge amounts of time (and more money of course) to run the direct debit campaign. More recently we have had the introduction of E3 in the NPS to contend with, where we have struck a ‘no redundancy’ agreement; one of very few unions to achieve that in the current climate.

 Add to all this the disgraceful treatment of public service workers under the government’s austerity measures and it adds up to some pretty testing challenges. But we are here: still standing, still fighting for what we believe in and defending the terms and conditions for our members wherever they work. The Napo team here at Falcon Road are engaging daily with 24 employers and it’s a tough operational landscape for us while we step up the ongoing media and political campaigning for the restoration of the probation service back into public ownership. I believe that will happen but I cannot predict when that will be. 

I will also admit that at times Napo has been perceived as slow to react to some of the big issues and that’s not for want of trying but mainly because we haven’t had the resources to do things we should or would like to have done as quickly as everyone would have wanted. That’s why we are confident that Napo’s strategy for growth will address some of our infrastructure and resource issues. This includes introducing new IT and looking at how we can offer practical support and development to help our hard pressed local reps on the ground who are themselves obviously facing difficulties with cuts to their facilities time and coping with the same workload pressures of their colleagues. 

We also need to restore visibility of Napo’s work on behalf of our members across NPS, CRCs Cafcass and PBNI. There are a whole host of reasons why Napo is not as visible as it used to be. But let’s face facts, on top of a huge increase in remote working as experienced particularly by our family court section membership, the TR programme has seen nearly 2000 staff leave the probation service, many of them long standing and highly capable Napo members and activists. We have had to shift our focus to identifying and training new reps, improving our personal and collective communications in a way that better engages with our members and potential members, and using our relatively positive financial position to invest wisely and, where needs be, spend to grow. 

I also don’t run away in the face of criticism. It comes with the job and I fully recognise that some Napo members have been unhappy about the way in which we have faced all or some of the above issues. Apart from pressing a nonexistent button marked ‘B’, I have yet to see a cogent case made anywhere that different approaches would have brought a different outcome to the issues we’ve been talking about. Make no mistake; these are issues which might have sunk other unions with less backbone than Napo. 

What do you see as the key priorities for Napo members as we head towards 2018? 

Members have made it absolutely clear that they want us to focus our efforts on tackling the pay freeze and that’s why it is top of the priority list. 

Whenever I meet with members up and down the country, a recurring theme is the daily struggles to make ends meet. Independent analysis has shown a huge disparity in pay between probation officers and their contemporaries in other fields. This cannot continue – not only is it demoralising for those whose hard work is not being adequately compensated, it also means we run the risk of losing highly qualified and experienced practitioners to other industries willing to pay them what they’re worth. 

I’m confident that any breakthrough on long term pay reform that we are able to secure in the NPS will have a positive knock on effect for those working in the CRCs and PBNI as employers will be under pressure to follow suit. 

In terms of CAFCASS pay, the funding streams are different but that does not lessen our priorities here in any way whatsoever. 

The public sector pay cap is a disgrace. I am still hoping that the TUC will galvanise its affiliate unions in 2018 to launch a concerted campaign. I will make sure that Napo is part of any action – including industrial action – to heap pressure on this deeply unpopular minority government. 

We also have to continue to raise awareness of the Transforming Rehabilitation debacle. It has been a long, slow grind to get politicians, media and the general public to really understand the implications of TR. But now we have the BBC inviting us to contribute to documentaries on the failings, the Justice Select Committee calling on our expert evidence, and of course the general public taking an interest in this policy that could, and arguably at times has, put their safety at risk. Rehabilitation must be a core principle of reducing reoffending as well as the imperative to reduce prison numbers – especially those pertaining to the HMP estate for Women prisoners. 

I have never been under any illusion that the campaign against TR would be a stroll in the park – and I can admit it was at times frustrating and disheartening to feel like we were just coming up against brick walls. But it feels good to know the tide is finally changing. I’ve managed to cultivate positive and productive relationships with Labour front benchers who are committed to restoring the probation service to public ownership, and have been in talks with Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Burgon, shadow justice secretary, to discuss how a Labour government would make this a reality. 

Finally we need to progress the strategy for growth plan in a way that moves Napo forwards, and consultation plays a key part in this. We will be running members’ surveys, engaging the National Executive Committee in a transparent way, and of course as you would expect of any good employer, we will be fully consulting with the Napo staff group about the potential impact any changes may have on them. 

As one of the few senior trade union leaders to have emerged from the BAME community in recent years, what’s your view on how to increase diversity in Napo? 

I have held a number of posts across four trade unions in my career and whilst Napo is by far the smallest of those I have been privileged to work for, our standing in terms of the percentage ratios for diversity of membership and active representatives (especially women members) is well up there compared to most unions. 

Our work on the professional agenda such as the Family Court Professional Conference, The Forum (formerly PSO Conference), the ‘Prevent’ strategy seminar we held last year and our excellent relationship with the Probation Journal editorial team are evidence of our inclusivity on the vocational issues. But am I satisfied that Napo has achieved the right balance in our demographic structures of members from the traditionally underrepresented groups? The answer is no, not yet. 

Is it racism that stops BAME members coming forward? I seriously hope not. It seems an awfully long time ago when in another trade union I was the recipient of a so-called joke at a meeting of their national executive committee that had clear racial connotations, and I would hope those days are gone for good. But it was only eight years ago that I was berated at a Napo NEC after being appointed as an AGS for being another ‘middle-aged white man’ (I was neither middle-aged nor ‘white’ actually) but it seems that preconceptions take some time to disappear. 

Because of my past experiences, it is important to me that any initiative Napo launches to increase inclusivity doesn’t appear tokenistic. I was proud to be invited to the inaugural event of Napo’s Black Members Network, but would really like to see this develop into a body that encourages wider interest from our BAME members across the union. It needs to become a place where individuals can feel both safe and empowered to talk about issues that are relevant to them. It should also be the place where issues are flagged for the wider membership to get behind and stand in solidarity with. 

But diversity isn’t just about race. It’s about having structures in place to support all sections of membership with specific interests or needs. LAGIP used to be the place for LGBT+ members to discuss issues of importance that were fed into the wider bargaining agenda. 

I want to see more involvement in our representative structures from our members who have a disability so that we can have regular dialogue about the work that we undertake in national negotiations on important issues such as Assistive Technology. 

We do however have success in the representation of women across our structures. Given the demographics of Napo where female membership runs at 70% of our total membership, it’s absolutely right that women make up the majority of the National Officer Group and that we have processes in place at NEC level for example to ensure that there are opportunities for sharing in leadership responsibilities. 

The Women in Napo initiative (WIN) is another success story that has played a huge part in encouraging member engagement and has provided another route through which new activists and national leaders have emerged and it has enriched this union. 

I’m open to feedback and suggestions on how we could make sure that more members feel included in the union, particularly as we are currently reviewing the way we engage with members. 

Napo’s membership has stabilised but union density across the public and private sector has declined. What part can Napo play in a recovery strategy? 

TR and the end of check-off dealt Napo a massive blow in terms of membership. Yes our numbers took a hit, but we have thankfully been able to stem the flow and our figures have stabilised over the past few months. 

That said, our next aim is to increase our density across all of the probation employers and in the family courts. This isn’t going to be an easy task – all unions are suffering, with the TUC recognising a decline in union density across the board. 

It is going to take some creative thinking and will require all hands on deck if we want to be more than just stable and actually move towards growing the union. 

It is absolutely vital that there is Napo training for reps and members who want to become reps. We are also working out the details on the best way to deliver coaching and development opportunities for branch activists and other members who would also like to step up to the plate. 

Technology has limited the way we can communicate and engage with members and potential members which is why I put in a successful bid to the NEC for resources to be available for a communication and ICT strategy that will remove many of the barriers and frustrations faced by both members and staff at HQ. I believe that if we can make it easier to facilitate two-way dialogue, HQ will be more equipped to serve members; and members will better respond to calls to action and throw their weight behind campaigns either by attending protests or rallies, or in other non-traditional ways of raising awareness such as online campaigns through social media. 

Napo has always been fortunate enough to have dedicated activists with a wealth of experience under their belts. But we do need to acknowledge the fact that many of them will be approaching retirement, or quite frankly, left exhausted by TR. It’s important that we start looking to younger members who can help support the knowledge we already have on board, but also add a fresh perspective on how we as a union, approach things.

My work with a number of general secretaries via the TUC and GFTU means that I am always exploring best practice. Given that we are so small in size compared to other major players, I am proud that we have won considerable respect and results where others haven’t been able to because of our campaign efforts. 

You have made it clear that you are putting yourself forward for a second term as general secretary, how committed are you to the job? 

Look, I believe in this union, its members and all the values that we collectively stand for. I am just as fired up now as I was when I joined a trade union at 16-years-old and became office rep. 

To work for a trade union and become its general secretary is an honour and a privilege. I am massively grateful to our members for the support and loyalty they’ve shown to Napo in what have probably been the most testing years in our history, so I have no intention of running for the covers. 

I decided to make my position clear about my hopes for a second term so that I can crack on with important work for members rather than get embroiled in constant speculation about my future intentions. There will be a selection process and if sufficient candidates emerge from that to take part in an election then so be it. But if that is the case, then nobody should be in any doubt that I will do my best to win it. At the end of that process it will be the will of the members that count.

You mentioned commitment, so let me say that my upbringing taught me the virtues of hard graft and belief in the members who employ me. It’s quite reasonable for those same members who are facing tough times at work to expect their staff at HQ to be doing their best on their behalf, and take it from me that’s what the Napo team here do every day. 

As I said at the AGM, it’s not just about working for our members across 24 employers but it’s about working with them to achieve the respect and dignity they deserve. I will do all I can to ensure that members are paid fairly for what they do and are recognised for the superb professionalism they bring to their work. 

Leadership is also about encouraging members to become more active in their union and fulfil their potential in terms of leading others, and I have a long track record of success in this respect across all the trade unions that I have worked for. 

My priority, if I am re-elected, is to work with the lifeblood of this union – members and activists – to increase our membership density and improve on the way we all communicate with each other. It’s also imperative that relationships and partnerships are cultivated and maintained with new and existing allies within the criminal and family justice sphere. I’m hopeful that with hard work we can improve our finances and ideally be in a position to reduce our subscription rates, then that will be a huge achievement. All of this will help Napo move into the next stage of its proud history and give our future generation of leaders a firm base to work from.


  1. Thank you Jim for your opening comments and for publishing this statement. For those of us who are not at the centre of the action, I for one would like to read more from Mr Rolfe. Could this be arranged please?

    1. Yes good idea and I would like to see what the Job description might be or people specifications to see how they match up to expectations or requirements.

    2. Mr M Rolfe v POA

      Ref: CO/53-55/17-18 PDF, 844KB, 14 pages

    3. PS. I am glad I do not have a vote as a retired member.

      I wonder if there is still time for more nominations - I thought I only read a Tweet from Mr Lawrence in the last week calling for nominations.

    4. This is a good point Andrew. I feel as if the whole process has been conducted behind a secret veil. Ok, there was an advert in the press, but for us members we seem to be subject to others' decisions about how this process is run, how they are chosen and any input we have as members. Can anyone advise of this and what's going on?

    5. Info about process is in the Constitution. You can access that on the Napo website. Every year members are reminded of the Constitution as it is added to the Annual Report(which is again available on the website)Copies of Annual report used to be sent out but that's now too expensive hence we must access online. All new members were supposed to be given a copy of Constitution by their Branch Membership Sec when they were enrolled. Again now due to expense you are referred to the webpage

  2. I would like to see what the GS candidates think they need to do to re-engage members and ignite their motivation to enable a proper democratic union that sees and hears it members and encourages activism and participation. Without this the union officials only work to serve themselves.

  3. It would help me, and possibly others, to know what the officially do/ are responsible for. We might appreciate them more if we knew.

  4. To refer to a non-existent button B suggests Ian Lawrence believes every step he took was the only one available – redolent of Thatcher's TINA: There is no alternative. He can come across as a tad arrogant and you do wonder how he absorbs new learning. It would have been more fruitful if the puff piece had asked him what his strategy has achieved. In truth, I don't think there was much that Napo, under any leadership, could have done to resist either TR of job cuts.

    If past elections for general secretary – including past incumbents – are anything to go by, the turnout will be in the region of 20%. The union membership has shrunk in recent years, but it's unfair to blame Ian Lawrence, because it's been the same sorry story across the public services, including the prison service whose union is bigger and more powerful than Napo.

    The option of electing someone steeped in the culture of the POA, doesn't seem the right fit for a probation union. Rolfe was unable to stem the flow of job cuts amongst prison officers. He also held a key position in the POA which he gave up to stand in the last parliamentary elections. He seems to have burnt some bridges with his POA colleagues and perhaps that's why he's now knocking at Napo's door.

    1. Ive read loud complaints on this blog many many times that NOMS was too prison focused, both in its construction and policy development.
      Much of the same criticisms were made when probation was lumped together under the title of HMPPS and prison being seen as the dominant P.
      Given those concerns, I find it difficult to see how a prison officer and a prominent figure from the Prison Officers Association would be welcomed as the GS of the probation union?


  5. It’s already been said. Lawrence has already failed Napo. Rolfe has experience of being a manager and prison officer. No experience of leading a union. Frying pan and fire. I’m out.

    1. Exactly who would vote for a Turn key Screw your having a laugh rolfy boy !

    2. Rolfe was an excellent chair of the POA and was forced to give up that position when he stood as a Labour candidate in last year’s general election.

  6. I never had a problem with NAPO or Ian. I agree with him, given the TR terrain and an anti union government, NAPO have survived a period that a small professional union might not have. Ian has not always been on top of his brief, particularly the unique, complex and various aspects of Probation work, but over the years he has improved. I was proud that NAPO took a stand against TR, Ian is right to say we stood alone. In addition NAPO predictions in respect of TR were absolutely right despite attempts by opponents to brand them as Union scaremongering and as vested interests set against change. I wish NAPO and whoever succeeds in becoming the next General Secretary all the best. If by chance I happen to return to Probation work I will, without hesitation, join NAPO.

  7. Ian Lawrence was effectively Grayling's man on the inside. Not withstanding the disingenuous twaddle spouted by him above he effectively hobbled any effective opposition to TR, all the time blaming the membership for a presumed lack of mettle while he made sure their were no meaningful efforts to galvanise or organise action that had a chance of disrupting, slowing, or stopping the disastrous 'transformation'. Still , credit where it's due , at least he continues to throw our money after the bosses' 'Probation Institute', and he's a tireless campaigner for forcing us to pay an annual fee from our own pockets for for the privilege of calling ourselves Probation Officers...

    1. Sorry, twaddle. Navigating the best interests of your members set against the opportunistic storm that Grayling and his ilk have perpetrated was never an easy task. Dispute strongly that NAPO or Ian were aligned to Grayling and co's ideology. It will, if it has not already, become increasingly apparent that one of the Conservative flagships (justice) in the public's mind is sinking. These people are not Conservatives as I once understood them to be. They are right wing revolutionaries and hence the title, Transforming Rehabilitation Revolution (failed).

    2. No point in just Blaming Ian Lawrence. He has an appalling team and they know even less than Ian does on what direction to take. Values need to be reappraised with the people in napo. Too much emphasis on Professional Association than a trade union. Too much all NPS than a joined up cohesion. The failure to be an effective union leads us to here. No point in scapegoating and revenge on Ian Lawrence either it will cost Napo dearly to pay him off. The failings belong to the team not just him. Why does Mr Berry attack the incumbent in this way ? Why did Berry not manage the general Secretary properly when he was a Vice chair why all the snide competition game playing at Napo members expense. At no time did any cross issues come to light. A real stab in back for what a personal grudge ? This election is based in Tory policy the old Thatcher law scenario to actually try and oust troublesome general secretaries of unions that harangued the Tories.
      It is this disloyalty and utter foolishness that makes napo a Union to laugh at. Non of the political players appear to have any assessment skills or able be to forecast what is best for unity and solidarity. They have responsible roles but do not seem able to know how to manage the situations.
      Mr berry personal vendetta will cost his candidate dearly lets hope there is justice as the self claimed socialist is acting out the Tories politics. Hardly a socialist at all.

  8. Can anyone tell me what we get for our subscriptions?

    1. Not sure. But the Home Office is giving away Crystal Meth.

    2. Over the years I have supported various causes, because I believed in them. Examples are my local community, global poverty, mental health, education, equality. I don't remember asking myself what is in it for me other than a more equitable and beneficial future for us all. You don't have to be in a Union. My experience, not personal, tells me that when the proverbial hits the fan, having the support of a Union is of immense value. Oh, the proverbial,over an extended career (not here today gone tomorrow) has an uncanny habit of finding the fan. Hope that is helpful. Question: Who do you stand for?

    3. The Home Office has confirmed that drugs, reported to be crystal meth, were found in the department's headquarter bathrooms last week.

      A spokesman said "a small quantity of drugs" was found in the 2 Marsham Street estate in central London on 3 May.

      The incident came three days after Sajid Javid replaced Amber Rudd as Home Secretary after she resigned over the Windrush immigration scandal.

      Security guards are believed to have discovered the stash of the highly addictive drug in a disabled loo.

      The spokesman said building security referred the incident to the police who came to the Home Office and removed the drugs.

      Scotland Yard decided to take no further action, he added, but could not explain why.

      The revelation comes on the same day Mr Javid tweeted a picture of himself with a sniffer dog at Heathrow Airport, praising him for helping to sniff out "drugs, cash and illicit goods".

  9. Milestones for Napo under Lawrence:

    * Legal, moral &/or co-ordinated resistance to TR was *missing in action*
    * Naivety or intentional collaboration with MoJ deprived members of professional respect & recognition of long service
    * A lack of understanding & experience around the Probation vocational mindset was always evident
    * An inability to accept criticism or admit being wrong/making mistakes

    Ledger left in disgraceful circumstances (good riddance) & was, for no clear reason, handed more than £100,000
    Long serving professionals have been harried out of their careers & received next-to-nowt.
    So, whilst fleecing it's members through expensive subs & selling off its most valuable asset (London property), Napo hasn't represented it's members' interests for a long time.

    1. Yes he should be axed for the sale of Napo silver.

  10. May 14 (Reuters) - Interserve PLC:

    * COLTRANE ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. RAISES STAKE IN INTERSERVE FROM 14.93 PERCENT TO 16.15 PERCENT Source text for Eikon: Further company coverage: