Monday, 11 December 2023

Relieve Jails = Overload Probation

I notice that the 'i' newspaper has picked up on the impending disaster for a probation service already broken. This from yesterday:-

‘Nobody’s safe’: Plan to relieve jails ‘will overload broken probation service’

Police, relatives of murder victim, and probation union say sentencing changes will place extra pressure on already 'struggling' service

Fears are being raised that a struggling, “broken” probation service will be unable to protect the public under plans to keep some criminals out of prison that will add thousands to its caseload. The Government wants to tackle prison overcrowding by instructing courts to deal with many offenders, who would currently go to prison, in the community instead. But the prospect of the probation service having to deal with a flood of extra cases has alarmed those who have already suffered from its shortcomings and led to warnings from the police and probation officers’ trade union Napo.

“We are not safe, you shouldn’t feel safe,” said Farah Naz the aunt of Zara Aleena who was murdered last year by a violent criminal who had been released from prison just nine days earlier. If this is what the government is doing to probation services, if this is what it’s landing on their shoulders, nobody is safe.”

The 35-year-old law graduate’s killer should have been arrested days before for breaking his licence conditions, and had been wrongly graded as only a “medium” risk of further harm. The killing in June 2022 was one of a series of recent cases where investigations have found dangerous blunders by probation services.

“If probation couldn’t keep up then, they certainly aren’t going to be able to keep up now,” Ms Naz told i. “How many dead bodies do they want?”

There are currently around 500 reports each year of people under probation supervision committing serious violent or sexual offences, including murders and rapes. Justice secretary Alex Chalk announced an early release programme in October to free up jail cells, which has caused concern over its application to violent offenders and domestic abusers.

A new Sentencing Bill, currently being considered by Parliament would further increase the pressure by raising the number of inmates released under a “home detention curfew” and forcing courts to “suspend” most prison sentences of under a year and subject offenders to “community orders” instead.

The Ministry of Justice says the change would add between 1,700 and 6,800 people to the probation caseload and require more monitoring and more rehabilitation programmes. But the Government has no plans to increase the probation service’s capacity to handle the new laws.

Tania Bassett, national official for the probation trade union Napo, said the service was already “broken”. She called the new laws a “recipe for disaster” because of the “phenomenal increase of demand into a workforce that can’t cope with the work it’s got already”.

Latest Government figures show that the probation service currently only has 68 per cent of the 6,780 officers needed for its “required staffing level”. It’s more than 2,129 officers short and saw saw more than 1,200 people quit in the last year.

“There’s been no thought to the capacity of probation to accommodate these changes” Ms Bassett told i. “We’ve been losing people as quickly as we’ve been recruiting them, and it means you’ve got a very inexperienced workforce dealing with a lot of complex cases.”

She said that the litany of errors in previous cases – like the killing of Zara Aleena and the four murders committed in Killamarsh, Sheffield, in 2021 by Damien Bendall, deemed by probation to be a “low risk” to his eventual victims – were not one-offs. Increasing caseloads worsened the quality of risk assessments and the “robust engagement” needed with offenders to properly supervise them, Ms Bassett added. “No one will pay attention until it’s gone horribly wrong,” she said. “It’s almost if no one is dead – nobody’s looking at it.”

Chief Constable Rob Nixon, who leads on criminal justice for the National Police Chiefs’ Council told i that the entire system was already “under strain”, with “too much demand and not enough capacity”. He said he expected police workload to increase as a result of upcoming changes because more released prisoners may commit further offences or break conditions requiring them to be tracked down and jailed.

“Where people are on a suspended sentence or they’re on licence conditions and they’re not complying, naturally policing will have to take a role in that but the bulk of the demand, I suspect, will fall on the probation service,” he said. Mr Nixon warned that offenders “need to be really effectively managed within the community”, and that the task requires probation not just to enforce their sentence but to “deal with any associated issues like housing and drug abuse”.

Another measure in the new Sentencing Bill aims to make rapists and other serious sexual offences serve their full sentences in prison rather than become eligible for release at the two-thirds point. It means some may have a licence period of just a year where they are supervised on probation. Ms Bassett warned that was not long enough to carry out accredited psychological programmes currently used to reduce the risk they pose. “If someone needs to do a community sex offender programme they won’t have time,” she said. “They would have to do everything inside but not all prisons provide it. They are less likely to receive meaningful rehabilitation in the community.”

In its most recent annual report published in September the HM Inspectorate of Probation said that two years after the Government reversed the disastrous part-privatisation of the service it was still “struggling” with chronic staffing shortages and “unmanageable workloads”. 

“My main concern is public protection, which has been a consistently weak area,” said the outgoing Chief Inspector of Probation, Justin Russell. “Probation officers have too many cases and too little time to focus on this key area of their work, putting the public potentially at risk.”

The watchdog also warned of the “ever-growing number of days when staff are absent because of sickness”, more than half of which are the result of mental-health issues linked to workplace stress.

Several MPs raised concerns about the Government’s plan during a debate on the Sentencing Bill on Wednesday, which saw the House of Commons vote the law through for scrutiny in the House of Lords. In response to a question on pressure on the probation service, Mr Chalk did not announce any measures to increase capacity, but said: “I am speaking to them directly about the workload that they face and how they can target it to protect the public most effectively.”

Labour’s shadow Justice Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said the Government was “failing to keep the probation service properly staffed, and these shortfalls could have dangerous consequences”. "The government’s strategy appears to be to take the pressure off the prison service, only to transfer it to the probation service instead,” she added. “The government has provided no new funding, no new resources and no action plan to deal with the significant additional workload for the probation service. That is not credible, not reasonable and not safe.”

Several Conservatives also called for action, with South Dorset MP Richard Drax saying he was “very concerned” about pressure on probation and Aylesbury MP Rob Butler adding; “It will be necessary to ensure that the probation service is properly resourced to support additional offenders.” Sentencing minister Gareth Bacon admitted demand would increase but said the Government was “committed to ensuring that probation has the resource it needs to meet demand”.

Chief executive of Justice charity Nacro, Campbell Robb, said: “In order to see less crime and fewer victims, ending ineffective short prison sentences is the right thing to do. “But key to the success of ending short sentences is a properly resourced probation service to provide the supervision, monitoring and support needed for people serving their sentence in the community. This is where the government’s focus must now be.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Our hard-working probation officers do incredibly important work in protecting the public and helping offenders turn their backs on crime. “That is why alongside our long-term reforms to prisons to keep the public safe – including keeping rapists and the most dangerous criminals locked up for longer – we are also investing £155m extra a year in the Probation Service to bolster the frontline and reduce workloads.”

The Probation Service was approached for comment.

48 comments:

  1. From Twitter Tania Bassett:-

    "Absolutely John. 2 different services with 2 different roles. 2 very different cultures. Probation needs to be kept as an independent service and profession. Get probation out of the civil service and released from prisons are Napo's key campaign targets."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Napo can only claim to campaign they have no influence authority or member following anymore. It's over for them. We are to wind and we have to see what labour does next bearing in mind labour set the trap of privatising probation.

      Delete
    2. “What’s Napo?”

      That’s what a group of probation staff said to me recently.

      They had knowledge of unions, but not probation unions.

      “What’s Napo?” Says it all. If nobody knows what it is, how can it possibly save us!

      Delete
    3. We need to help rebuild Napo and support it as our professional voice not just take every opportunity to put the boot in. Like it or not it is Napo, UNISON and GMB Scoop the employers negotiate with however many members they have in the probation workforce. Perhaps think before commenting about how those in power will take comfort in knowing that they can proceed unchecked as negative comments about trade unions embolden right wing politicians. We all know Napo needs top table reform but there are actually some very good people coming up and to the fore who are challenging the existential threats such as OneHMPpS. People like Helen Banner Carole Doherty and Ben Cockburn. Solid down to earth probation folk deserving of support. We must find ways to strengthen them. Join a Union and get involved.

      Delete
    4. And exactly how will we “rebuild Napo”? It is Napo’s own general secretary and executive that demolished Napo. It is not a voice of probation or a professional association. The majority of probation workers are not Napo members and some probation officers don’t even know what Napo is!! You’re deluded about “Solid down to earth probation folk”, there are none leading Napo and probably never will be. Napo has failed in representing probation and gaining members.

      Delete
  2. Farah stands up for Probation more than ourselves. She speaks with great pain and courage. We just whimper on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 09.08, I’m all in favour of supporting new, up and coming talent however the problem remains as to how we implement top table reform.
    It does not appear that IL will go voluntarily, and presumably, in his own head at least, he thinks he is doing sterling work.it’s hard to tell as there is no communication. In theory, he could be like General Franco and reputedly deceased but still acting as a figurehead until a transition can be cobbled together.
    The reform needs to come urgently, not just to oust the present incumbents but also to ensure that we do not find ourselves in the same position in years to come. In short, we need to instil some democracy into the union so that the employers understand that representatives have a mandate. We also need to enable the deselection of individuals who don’t perform rather than allowing them to gather cobwebs and take a salary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think there is some agreement that Napo’s elected officers are generally ok but the officials ie those employed by Napo (not the administrative staff) are not performing well and resistant to being held accountable for consistently poor performance. There are procedures to subject the General Secretary and his fellow officers to capability proceedings but these are so onerous to be almost unthinkable. Officers would of course bring their own trade unions in to represent themselves, complain to the TUC, take Napo to a tribunal, and create merry hell rather than give up their positions for the good of the Union and those they represent. Unfortunately we are stuck with the General Secretary and those that cower under his wing but we can support the officers of the union and give them a boost whilst making clear the GS and Co are dead weight. You might also consider that it is the GS and Co that have a problem with this blog and not the officers who can think for themselves. Let’s make the smarter distinction between crap officials and some pretty good hard pressed officers who are doing the job rather than poo pooing Napo in its entirety.

      Delete
    2. Lay officers have nowhere near the basic bank of info to manage this guy out properly this debate rumble on and he will exhaust the funds before he falls over sadly the parasite wins in this leaching on.

      Delete
    3. You all might realise this officer group just shoehorned this guy back into role they can hardly be considered able to look after members interest by such action . They actually disqualified other candidates as unsuitable out of the traps. A clear indication he has this top table sorted and on the wrong side in my view. The commentary above does not stack up.

      Delete
    4. Not likely it was this officer group that recently helped him back into 5 more years by dismissing all or any other applicants for the election. So no election he succeeds to an incredible new term and has not achieved any protective position in toto of performance to date.

      Delete
  4. 09.08 : ....''Like it or not it is Napo, UNISON and GMB Scoop the employers negotiate with however many members they have in the probation workforce.''.....them same employers who are also aware that there are insufficient numbers in the membership to get anything over the line.. these employers do not give in to the powers of persuasion, which is all that the good folk negotiating with them have, no matter how good they are.

    It's a simple numbers game, the only way to get positive change is to recruit more members, only then will the employer take note ... I can't believe I'm even writing this .. for evidence look at others industries that have had union results this year, can you spot the difference ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't agree with this pitiful defence of NAPO. A lame "sweetheart" trade union (NAPO) is much, much worse than no union at all as it gives members the illusion that they will be represented and that their rights will be protected when Senior Managers victimise and bully them...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment triggered me at least to ask can we debate this point. I know for a fact Napo top table fiddled the result and dumped Thompson's the lawyers for trade unions from their tendering farce to ensure another legal firm took the reigns. I suspect it was more a vanity leap as private use of legal advice instead of member services was the new direction.
      It is well known since the loss of the reps panel also done to us by Napo ags now gone we lost the employment tribunal strength. We know for many the reps today broker beg and ask for mitigations as a sympathy response to reinstalling staff back in the Nps rat hole and be grateful for abuse. Nothing against these new reps but they are not known for their IT1 submissions or their battles through Acas. This is also known to employers that even if Napo wanted to pretend it was no longer a toothless tiger it still lacks any resources to bring any case. Napo has to appreciate the members are far too long being kept helpless and their revolution would see the end of Napo sad to say but in order to negotiate a forced change to Napo leadership apathy or collusion we have to act by stopping their funding. Why Napo need to sit up and think about this risk to their jobs is that more of the same from a leadership which is coasting cannot realistically think we will pay for them much longer. If the top table understood staffs despair in there daily routine and that their failure will contribute to end Napo perhaps then we might get member led protections back in Tribunals so the employers get a taste of their abuse as can win cases. Also get Thompson's back.

      Delete
    2. Totally disagree with your take. Napo reps do a fine job day in day out. The General Secretary does little of his own volition. Unions are democratic bodies. If you want change you need to be part of the Union not fist waving from the safety of your armchair. Join the Union. Go to your branch. Get elected. Become an NEC rep.Get support for a no confidence in GS motion. If you have done all that and got nowhere then by all means you have every right to rubbish the Union.

      Delete
    3. Loads of people have attempted to do all sorts of Napo GS accountability. However he has slipped the clutch of the intelligencia by pulling his self protecting group around . Best man rewards at the stokeld wedding and associated officers. Some others have tried Kent and Essex approached which effectively consolidate him Even taken them on but top table excuse themselves. You know it's corrupted to make such a statement. There are no chairs or branches up to the levels we saw in talents pre pandemic. Just to recall so we all know general secs are supposed to write policy ensure legal cases to protect minimum standards in our core role. Liaise in professional tasks and ensure a best practice guide is available regularly. Prevent reductions provide supported exits and ensure best terms for leavers. A whole lot more to include negotiating pay ensuring the pay gap is is reduced for the lower rewarded. Represent the the overworked the stressed. I know as do a few more he barely does anything and if he was subjected to a desk and keystrokes check you won't find an e mail most likely. He has been exposed once but they let him off because they all colluded and the ball was dropped. He has attacked individual NEC members several times and the NEC side up to him you might know we all know the truth about Ian Lawrence. A lot of power abusers get found out after they have gone let's hope there is some justice.lets hope he goes sooner.

      Delete
    4. What number of employment Tribunals have the Napo reps taken forwards. How many used Acas. How many prima facie cases did the employers hand out to Napo reps . How many took legal advice and advancement to formal lawful claims. ...............yea none I thought not I guess this is why hrbp dont shit themselves at the sound of Napo calling. You have no idea clearly and even a crystal clear case Napo would hand it back. Spirit of conciliation bullshit. Napo and Lawrence don't know what a real fight for terms is. Absolute tossers

      Delete
    5. I think you will find that the GS had a very cozy relationship with Thompsons and did not want to end it - neither did Thompsons. I wouldn’t shed too many tears for the reps panel - nice little earner whilst it lasted. The panel was a flashback to a time when Napo had a far bigger membership and could afford them. Nice guys no doubt. Sometimes you need to cut your cloth to fit.

      Delete
    6. Quite a few have done just that. Also recall the time the NEC bullied out about 5 members in dispute with this man . The NEC baying sheep. Carried an unjust process through Wannabees. You got what you deserve in this lamented union which it is not now. Nor a professional anything as our jobs are admin monitors. I do blame the gravy train teflon coated secretary.

      Delete
    7. 20:56 nice earner was it. I don't think so those reps took cases to court for members and Napo had the benefit of being able to deliver. Cutting the cloth has come from members hides and I have not seen the GS salary reduce with membership he no longer retains. His cloth needs shearing. Napo decline may be a factor and the reasons for this are cost lack of organisation poor reps training aggressive management hrbp case working warehouses. Napo came back with nothing. Handed them the control and now just spending it's reserves and income on bare existence. GMB scoop are known rubbish and Napo are now worse. Unison never change. If can cut the cloth properly why have a GS at all after all he has no plan no idea no portfolio and no following that equals no pay but of course he is old terms unlike us he won't allow himself to be shafted just everyone else.

      Delete
    8. 1433 if there are no cases to tribunals the reps are.not delivering simple.
      The employers are far worse than it was. I think they now know they get away with it a free pass from Napo.

      Delete
  6. on now...

    https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/c63d5036-d3d9-40f7-bb47-e8a5e7a1b5ab


    Witness(es): Rt Hon Edward Argar MP, Minister for Prison, Parole and Probation, Ministry of Justice; Phil Copple, Director General Operations, HM Prison and Probation Service

    ReplyDelete
  7. ref justice committee hearing - only watch if you're determined to lose the will to live. Its a dire, dreary experience with utter nonsense & scripted drivel being spaffed by copple & argar (who pocket shitloads of public money) while sir bob & his chums (another group of publicly funded deadheads) cheerily swallow every last drop with enthusiasm.

    "The Justice Committee was appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Ministry of Justice and associated public bodies"

    In reality its just hours & hours of mutual masturbation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. WTF is going on! Haven't had time to even read the article but I am being bombarded with requests about releasing people against my wishes and who are some of the most risky and dangerous people out there. Just because their index offence isn't violence but majority of recent offences are. I am being harassed by faceless imbeciles at MOJ to get AP or CAS 3 or whatever so they can be turfed out just before Christmas to accommodate miles away that they are unlikely go to, with no support in place. This is going to massively increase risk. Won't be long before someone gets murdered by someone out on early release. Someone needs to whistle blow as the whole situation is seriously unsafe and this is detracting from our core work also. I can't keep up with everything and all the demands. This is crazy, this is plain wrong. Someone please knock some heads together at MOJ. What the hell have you done?

    ReplyDelete
  9. That MOJ spokesperson hasn't got a clue! You are turfing out dangerous offenders just before Christmas. People with a history of domestic violence, risk to children and general public but you think that's OK because you are keeping a few rapists in for longer! You only look at the index offence and no one has bothered to explore their history of violence and some are even under investigation for serious offences when you are turfing them out against the wishes of their probation officers who know them best. This will go down as one of the worst decisions the MOJ and this government have made in the CJS. That and privatisation. How can we trust any of you and take your spinmongering seriously. Stand back and dodge the heads as they roll.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If you've had a POM/COM handover, primacy for an early release lies with the COM and there should be more pushback from the COM for this abysmal programme to clear the dregs of the jails. Who put the administrators in the prison in charge of dictating to COMs what to do with an early release? Sorry, but I've got the qualification, not you. What a shambles- all for some overpaid apparatchik who licks Mr Chalk's boots. Yes, master, I will get these undesirables out of our prisons but we won't do anything to help the COMs. A Win/Win for the prison with the COM morphed into an 'under manners' culture of doing exactly what an unqualified clerk is telling you to do. The level of disrespect is palpable. And, if you play a game of risk with early releases, you will put the public AT further risk. It just stands to reason. Figures in the abstract on an excel spread sheet with a man in his first M&S suit with a degree from Oxford, can be the next victim in the real world. All the while, the crisis in community probation will continue unabated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Listen mate, the fact some senior prison official decided you should be called a COM instead of a Probation Officer says it all !

      Delete
  11. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/12/IPP-thematic-report-v1.0.pdf

    https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/media/press-releases/2023/12/ipp-recall-thematic/

    There was a lack of support for those with substance misuse and/or mental health issues. This was often the cause for a deterioration in behaviour leading to recall.
    Staffing issues meant prisoners experienced a lack of continuity during both custody and the period spent on licence, with some being supervised by several different probation officers (POs). This has led to a lack of trust and an unwillingness to communicate concerns with their POs.
    People were not prepared well for their release into the community. Many felt overwhelmed with life in the community and struggled to cope.


    This report makes 11 recommendations. Two of these are for the MoJ including to work with other government departments to ensure those serving IPP sentences are able to access appropriate help. Nine recommendations are for HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), including to improve the continuity of case management and ensure those serving IPP sentences are actively managed through multi-agency forums.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://insidetime.org/labour-opposes-ipp-resentencing/

      Delete
    2. NE is a joke. Probation HoA, “my title is Doctor” strutting his stuff and selling out probation, he really, really does not know (or perhaps cares) how his style impacts others. I am actively looking to get out after 14 years as a PO, and once very proud to be a Probation Officer- not a OM/POM or whatever they want to call me. My views on IPP etc mean nothing, I just need to input data and meet targets So the Doc can tell his superiors how much better he is than his peers- yes he will shit on you too! For colleagues concerned about taking the leap talk to colleagues in YOS, mental health or for some of the more punative colleagues check out G4S - you even get a uniform . I am done with probation, although I concede that areas beyond the North East do not have such dictatorial HoA and retain old school managers grounded in advise assist and befriend. I certainly hope so?

      Delete
    3. Is this the same HoA who did his PhD at the very same time he did his Probation Officer qualification? Has he ever managed cases or completed the multiple OASys assessments the rest of us had to do to gain our qualification? Strange that….oh also is he the one who plays Churchillian speeches to motivate staff and has no idea how demotivated people were after his total inability to read the room?

      Delete
    4. Further down South it is no different. Those at the top of the PDU pile are either greasing the OneHMPPS machine or being flattened by it. We hear the East of England RPD has announced his retirement. That’s the last big one I know of that has any idea what real probation work actually is. Sad to see him go as a true advocate of probation practice and well known throughout the region for a good few decades or more. It comes as no surprise after Area Executive Directors were put in place to ensure the Probation Service bends the knee. I think thats all the nails firmly in the probation coffin now!

      Delete
  12. Back in the day an officer who had been shafted by the employer tried to get assistance from NAPO to take up her case to no avail. Not to be thwarted she however decided to do the work herself ( she knew a good lawyer who gave her good advice ) personally attending and representing herself and ending up with a nice 30000 settlement .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Similar Napo fought a member against getting full compulsory redundancy package shameful bastards they know who they are we fought Napo and beat them and got the full package. They have no clue from their top .

      Delete
    2. 15/22@22:00
      Have heard similar on this blog. Unfortunately I don't think it's any different anywhere else! We are increasingly under the thumb of the Civil Service and anyone who doesn't submit to their master is going to have a very hard time. The majority of experienced staff will be gone in the next 5 years because the job has become target focused and feels like corporate abuse, cyber stalking of staff and getting virtually whipped by notifications to do this or that, meet this target,bombarded with online training and patronising messages about use of dashboard or portals! The job is becoming impossible for so called offender managers who carry bulk of the risk and flounder with lack of joined up working with other services and other services having similar staffing issues. We are left to carry the can every time and if something goes wrong we are made to feel the ones at fault who have to justify every single step we have taken. There is zero emotional support and zero recognition of what we do and how incredibly complex it is and the emotional toll it takes. The early release fiasco has added a whole new dynamic and level of stress as our views and any authority we had to make decisions about risk is further undermined. Many experienced colleages are now reviewing their options and suggest others do likewise because it's only going to get worse.

      Delete
  13. Friday Napo mailout:-

    Helen Banner Resigns as National Chair

    Napo's National Chair Helen Banner, who commenced her role in October 2022, has informed the General Secretary of her decision to resign from her post.

    In her letter to Ian, Helen references that having returned from a period of 3 weeks post-operative sick leave, combined with the expectations placed on her, she has concluded that she cannot continue in her role.

    Ian comments: 'Members will share my disappointment on hearing this news. Helen has been highly effective in applying her extensive professional knowledge to our work with senior management and has given tremendous energy and total commitment on behalf of all Napo members during her time as National Chair.

    I am sure that Napo members everywhere will join the Officers and Staff in offering Helen our best wishes for the future.

    Ben Cockburn appointed as acting National Chair

    Given the proximity of the seasonal break the (elected) Napo Officer’s Group met this morning and those present agreed that Ben Cockburn – Vice Chair (Probation) – will take on the role of acting National Chair until a further decision can be made at the next meeting of Napo’s National Executive Committee (NEC), now expected to take place in early-mid January of 2024.

    For information for members Napo’s Constitution contains the following provision for these circumstances:-

    “9(d) Should an officer for any reason cease to hold the office to which she or he has been elected before the period of office expires, the NEC shall be empowered to fill the vacancy by: (i) the appointment of an acting Chair or Vice-Chair, or; (ii) inviting nominations for the vacant post and conducting an election by secret ballot of all full members.”

    Further news will be issued in respect of this process in due course.

    Napo HQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry to hear of this. The less credible Napo becomes yet again.

      Delete
  14. 13th December 2023

    ONE HMPPS DISPUTE – UNIONS SECURE IMPORTANT CONCESSIONS

    Introduction and background:
    Napo, UNISON and GMB/SCOOP decided to enter a formal dispute on the One HMPPS programme on 4th October 2023. This was due to a combination of developments as set out below and followed earlier notice by way of a Pre-Dispute letter to senior Probation Management.

    The unions lodged this dispute in line with the established Probation Service National Disputes Resolution Procedures. This was in respect of differences relating to the introduction, roll-out and overall inadequate arrangements for the consultation machinery used for One HMPPS.
    It was our collective view that One HMPPS represents a significant change programme, with the potential to have a very real impact on our member’s Terms and Conditions if the programme goes ahead within the proposed design model.

    We had also concluded that the new layer of management being established via the creation of the Area Executive Directors would result in unnecessary bureaucratic control over the Regional Probation Directors. This has raised significant alarms bells because of the impact it will have on the Probation Service and specifically the detrimental consequence for probation’s identity within a prison centric initiative.

    Grounds for the dispute:
    This centred on seven principle areas:
    1. Failure of the employer to offer a One HMPPS Implementation Agreement

    2. The lack of meaningful engagement through the use of Annex A’s

    3. The impact on the existing collective bargaining machinery

    4. The consequences of One HMPPS for the jointly owned Probation Job Evaluation Scheme

    5. The refusal failure by the employer to agree a pause on One HMPPS

    6. The threat to the integrity of the Probation Profession

    7. The absence of an Equality Impact Assessment

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need a risk assesment for the impact on all staff but your 5 years too late for this lame attempt. They have done it already and yet no doubt Napo lap squeak GS will run around claiming all sorts while winking at the senior management. Croc.

      Delete
  15. With reference to Helen Banner's resignation it would be useful to have sight of her resignation letter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's the point she is going and I don't blame she's had a year to see under the bonnet of the Napo shit show and no doubt will be more than able and sharp enough to work out an exit statement. I'm sure Helen has integrity and I am not to impune in any way. Even if it was a toe nail crack or a small freckle removal that's good enough for me. No one leaves Napo undamaged by the decline only the previous chairs who rushed in with wild abandon and inflicted their authoritarian mega egos on us at least Helen walks before being responsible for more fall off the cliff next step from the kazi GS.

      Delete
  16. It's all going according to plan, 'swimmingly good", with a little help from MTC.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/strengthening-probation-building-confidence-monthly-bulletin/probation-service-change-bulletin-issue-21-december-2023

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Area Executive Directors

      * sarah coccia - prisons
      * alan scott - prisons
      * sarah chand - probation
      * helen judge - civil servant
      * chris jennings - career administrator
      * david hood - prisons "I am David Hood. I am the vice-president of international business for MTC. I was the MD for MTC in the UK. We run London and Thames Valley CRCs."
      * ian barrow - probation

      Delete
    2. Yes, David Hood’s views and track record has concerns. It is shocking an entire new tier of management has been created to put these prison executives in charge of probation.

      “The firm’s managing director when they were monitoring McSweeney was David Hood, 51, who lives in a £1million home in Kent.

      On parent company MTC’s website, Mr Hood, now promoted to vice-president of MTC, bragged the “legacy” of their rehabilitation work with offenders in London had been “successful”.

      But we can reveal that often their firm’s handling of the contract was anything but.”

      https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/21276461/probation-zara-aleenas-violent-killer-medium-risk/amp/

      Delete
  17. Says they decided 4th October obviously the pre warning letter saw management fall about with a fit of chuckles eh Napo saying anything must have been hilarious. As for the notice let's frame as piece of useless history Napo will get lost in as the leader don't have a clue apart from his boring lost approach can we talk please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was all three unions. So why are you Just focusing on NAPO

      Delete