Sunday 3 December 2023

Lets Look At Napo

It's been some time since I've said much about Napo and that's for a variety of reasons. I didn't attend the AGM and conference and somewhat unusually, I didn't have a lot to say about the motions up for debate because to me the absolutely key issue was a campaign to get probation out of the clutches of HMPPS command and control and the dead hand of the civil service. So where did that feature on the list of motions? Nowhere, apart from Wales where Napo Cymru got their act together as I outlined here. 

Lets remind ourselves of what the 2022 AGM produced for the current years Operational Plan:-

National Executive 

  • Fight for our professional integrity and our professional status by working with other Criminal Justice partners and unions to maintain our professional standards in Courts; fight the changes to the Parole process and fight to reinstate our ability to make recommendations; support staff involved in open parole hearings; continue to fight Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) especially the line management of probation staff by prisons; and campaign to take us out of the Civil Service in order to regain our independent professional status (Resolution 7)

  • Napo will redouble our demands for Probation to be taken out of the civil service, and unshackled from the Prison Service. Napo members will write to their MPs making this position clear. The NEC will draft a suggested briefing note and letter, and Napo will engage in a press and communications exercise, responding to each of the inevitable future “poor” and “needs improvement” inspection report making this position clear (Resolution 9)
Pretty feisty stuff and clear cut. Fast forward to AGM 2023 and had it not been for Napo Cymru putting forward a spirited motion making the case for probation in Wales being fully devolved, the absolutely key issue of divorce from HMPPS wouldn't even have been discussed at all at Nottingham! 

Thank goodness for the the valiant efforts of Napo Cymru and their unstinting campaigning and assiduous political lobbying. I would venture to suggest that Napo England has much to learn from their efforts and should they bear fruit post the general election and a new UK Labour Administration, probation England is going to look pretty stupid as a totally isolated example of how not to do it. Sadly, Napo will look even more irrelevant than many feel it has already become. One can only speculate how the union is regarded by the MoJ and the HMPPS command and controllers! . 

So, this is what the new 2024 Operational Plan has to say:-

OBJECTIVE 3: CAMPAIGNING AND COMMUNICATING

Maintaining Napo’s high profile in successfully campaigning, promoting and communicating Napo’s policies and values. Organise the re-instatement of a national, amalgamated public Probation service and keep Cafcass as a public service, both with sufficient resources to guarantee jobs and service delivery. To work with unions, relevant organisations, MPs, Assembly Members, peers, parliamentary groups and others as appropriate in relation to wider public service campaigns.
  • Actively, urgently and persistently campaign for the devolution of Probation in Wales, focussing these efforts on the Westminster Labour Party, demanding that the devolution of Wales Probation is included in the UK Labour manifesto for the next General Election (Resolution 19)
National Executive Committee 
  • Raise awareness of the impact of staff shortages on serious further offences, highlighting this is increasingly through unsafe working practices and negotiate with the employer the circumstances in which Corporate Responsibility will be applied (Resolution 5).
  • Call on the MOJ and government to put immediate measures in place to alleviate dangerously high workloads and address recruitment and retention with a decent pay rise (Resolution 6)
  • Review recommendations in respect of possible industrial action when reports are received from Officers and Officials in respect of the formal One HMPPS dispute; the recent call from the outgoing HM Inspector of Probation for an independent enquiry into the state of Probation; the Lord Chancellor’s announcement of the early Release scheme and the removal of Divisional Sex Offender Units, which is detrimental to the public protection, the wellbeing of case managers and the communities we serve (Resolution 7)
Pretty feeble and mealy-mouthed I would venture to suggest. But the last reference provides a good example of why probation needs to be out of HMPPS completely. Lets look at what the position is regarding Divisional Sex Offender Units and indeed the MoJ/HMPPS track record on this important and key area of probation work. We've had the scrapping of the much maligned Sex Offender accredited programme; removal of funding for Circles UK; intended scrapping of the DSOU's; no sign of much encouragement of initiatives such as the Safer Living Centre in Nottingham, and then I spotted this from a notice of a forthcoming NOTA training event in Leeds:-
"This training is not available to staff of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service who use their own programmes and toolkits."

Now NOTA are an extremely well respected outfit that have been around a long time in the field of work with sex offenders:- 

NOTA’s Charitable Objectives are to advance education for the benefit of the public, amongst members of the profession or persons working with or providing services for people who have committed sexual abuse or others having a legitimate professional interest in the field, and to promote or assist in promoting research into the skills associated with the professions who work with or provide services for people who have committed sexual abuse and into the efficiency of existing skills and practices, and to disseminate the useful results of such research for the benefit of the public.

Why on earth are probation staff forbidden from attending? In the past we were encouraged to join NOTA and attend events. Methinks it's a perfect example of control freakery from HMPPS, an organisation that is rapidly demonstrating it is unfit for purpose.







15 comments:

  1. I’m afraid, after ten years, I left Napo. The lack of understanding within my union of how this JES has impacted PSOs in relation to the sex offender programmes was stark. I fully empathise with the POs affected, however the JES showed the equal risk held by PSOs delivering constant BBR. We have highly experienced programmes PSOs leaving in droves with the type of work that is heading our way, on a significantly lower wage. Napo have long neglected to listen to PSOs in all roles. I’m with Unison now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unison are just as useless.the problem with Napo and it is the general secretary in the main. They actually held a principle of attempting to negotiate. In that they have failed to win any argument on merit. It is well catalogues Lawrence has no particular skill in negotiations or defending members. He has none in pro actively writing any Napo policy position.
      It went off the cliff the second Napo signed away all members terms and conditions to that of the civil service. We now have the magic of sscl to manage staff absence sickness holiday pay term and conditions. A Privatised warehouse full of clerks who use a staged procedure to bully staff to death. Policies written for prisons now apply to us. The reason there is no representations or employment cases is because Napo reps cannot penetrate the sscl legalistic adherence to abusive policy. So no role Napo. Members are jettisoned or abused . Ian Lawrence signed us up for this and yet is still in role. It illustrates Napo members are blind to what Napo central is about. Napos position is a pretence as they have actively colluded. This was very in health safety issues workloads job evaluation po role deprofessionalised. We need a new union free of this clown. Anyone else would do better than his complete surrender of us.

      Delete
    2. Reference Anon 09:48 I feel the need to record that very similar criticisms of the General Secretary are submitted and which I routinely delete due to them being grossly offensive. On this occasion I feel the post is making a reasonable point as to perceived ability and track record and have therefore allowed it.

      Delete
    3. There should be a proper evaluation of what the unions should have done. The terms and conditions of complete under performance should trigger a process of control. No football team retains a dud manager why does Napo.

      Delete
    4. "One can only speculate how the union is regarded by the MoJ and the HMPPS command and controllers! ."

      On Friday the MoM published their "prison service, looking after our people" strategy.
      One HMPPS is included in it although probation only receives a passing reference, as does NAPO.
      There is no "looking after people in probation" stratagy, and I think that speaks exactly to how the MoJ regard NAPO.

      https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-after-our-people-the-prison-service-employee-package/looking-after-our-people-the-prison-service-employee-package--2

      'Getafix

      Delete
    5. Oh probation is included 'Getafix - here it is:-

      OneHMPPS
      The OneHMPPS programme is helping to ensure Probation and Prison frontline staff have the right support to be able to deliver the very best services.

      We want to build on what we already have and bring HMPPS closer together to achieve better outcomes for victims, communities, and offenders.

      This includes:

      a HQ structure that provides a greater focus and support for colleagues working in operations
      an area model that will bring prisons and probation closer together
      the appropriate tools and agreements that ensure HMPPS requirements are serviced by MoJ (and vice versa)

      The benefits of OneHMPPS include:

      a more cohesive end-to-end offender journey
      a better experience of HMPPS for offenders, staff, and stakeholders
      shared expertise across prison, probation, and HQ functions with reduced silo working
      the right balance between regional services and national consistency
      a stronger regional impact through devolved decision-making

      Delete
  2. "Maintaining Napo’s high profile in successfully campaigning, promoting and communicating Napo’s policies and values". What? Nobody outside of probation has a clue who they even are and that goes for a fair few within probation too. NAPO appears to be an instrument used to get your bosses ideas accepted.

    As to being forbidden to attend NOTA events the withdrawing of funding for UK Circles ought to tell you everything you need to know. NOTA try to do some good whilst current probation thinking is punitive, punishment and villification of all things sex offender.

    The sad thing is you won't fight back because too many of your number believe this is a good thing.
    sox

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Organise the re-instatement of a national, amalgamated public Probation service and keep Cafcass as a public service, both with sufficient resources to guarantee jobs and service delivery."

    That's a wet dream, not an objective. napo doesn't have the authority or power to "organise" any such thing. They might campaign for it, they might argue for it, but its not in their gift to 'organise' it. Utter gibberish.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The General Secretary says a lot but doesn’t ever actually achieve anything. NAPO reps fight tooth and claw for the staff they represent and I have nothing but the utmost respect for them, having needed their support on several occasions,. Unfortunately though they are up against a General Secretary who is unwilling to support them and is inactive, and this has a huge impact on NAPO members and the service overall as a whole. Without the support of the General Secretary, reps are banging their heads on a wall in frustration, because change won’t happen. All cried to remove us from the civil service fall on deaf ears. Words are cheap. The General Secretary needs to do the job he is employed to do, or stand down so someone competent can step up and try to fix the mess he has caused.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is well put and yet nothing can be done. He will wait for Napo collapse on member funding viability . All staff will be redundant and he will collect a quarter of a million pounds from Napo funds to settle his redundancy clause. Members have no idea he is taking them for a ride as his terms provide for this It is in the red book conditions I am told . That should be published. Meantime 100k per year for what exactly . I am surprised as there is qualification basis for the job and I don't think he even holds a degree. We need an NEC motion of confidence in this post holder.

      Delete
  5. Terribly unfair criticism of Ian Lawrence as the napo mouse is hibernating until Spring and therefore shouldn't be expected to rouse itself to any form of action until then...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Starmer praising Thatcher and still refusing to call for a ceasefire in Gaza!!!!!!!!! What the F! The culture of them and us is growing, you can see it in what used to be probation, you can see it nationally and internationally.. I truly despair and really, really don’t want to go to work tomorrow as I know my shiny spangle, fast track SPO will have no interest, or understanding, of my feelings. I doubt she even knows the Al Jazeera channel, or for that matter where Gaza is ,or the history of Palestian. But hey, she can count beans but not bodies in Gaza or colleagues going sick. Shine on you crazy diamond and continue to kiss arse with absolutely no understanding of your place in the mortal coil FU you and your ilk!

    ReplyDelete
  7. There’s so many branches of Napo throughout England and Wales. Why haven’t they joined together to root out Ian Lawrence and the entire top table? The rot is much wider, they’re all part of it. Napo is a waste of time and money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some have tried to manage this process and the foolish Wannabees have corrupted Napo and protect him. Too much pub culture at the top. The previous joint chairs and subsequent bully just held a role but had no idea what they were doing. They have accomplished nothing but destroyed probation with their passive aggression.

      Delete
  8. BBC News - Ruth Perry: Ofsted inspection 'likely contributed' to headteacher's death
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-67639942
    How long before we have similar situation in Probation due to brutal inspections and SFO's? Only a matter of time if it hasn't already happened. So many SFO's at the moment and you are lucky if senior staff even bother to ask how you are feeling let alone provide appropriate debrief or counselling.

    ReplyDelete