Friday 14 October 2022

Down to the Sea



Napo Conference 2022 Day One

A damp misty afternoon in The Winter Gardens Eastbourne set the scene for Napo’s AGM. The event that is both in person and virtual felt like a much smaller more subdued affair than the last time it was held here. There were less people in the hall and the lighting on the top table was overly bright with a large screen positioned so that they were obscured but they could no doubt see the virtual participants.

The conference opened with the traditional roll call with the usual murmurs when Merseyside Branch were not present. With some branches only fielding a few attendees some of the cheers seemed a bit strained. Some members will remember conferences past when branches would proudly drape their banners around the hall and the roll call was met with loud cheers from the larger branches with London alone fielding ninety participants.

The departing Chair Katie Lomas gave a very lengthy and somewhat overly self congratulatory address that provoked a somewhat Marmite response from the faithful, many of whom had found something more interesting to look at on their phones. Katie’s super power is to speak without pause or hesitation for hours on end without giving way. Noticeably not everyone in the hall stood to applaud her, though several woke up at that point.

I imagine many could not help thinking that the appalling pay deal will be her lasting legacy and her comments about the unstinting support of the General Secretary felt odd and slightly disingenuous. Indeed Ian Lawrence seemed uncharacteristically subdued and uncomfortable in the glare of the lights that for an unapologetic narcissist and serial grandstander might count as somewhat odd behaviour. Perhaps he is worried that he is being gradually reduced to a sort of figurehead. Perhaps he will perk up when we get to motion number 12 that will be the ideal opportunity for members to express their confidence in him.

Then on to formal business as ever with the mild mannered and seemingly never changing Jeanne Peall giving the order of business. I sometimes wonder if they keep Jeanne cryogenically frozen between AGMs as she seems unchanged for as long as I have been attending AGMs. Perhaps she should be given some sort of long service award.

Appearing virtually mid trial from Leicester Crown Court, conference were treated to an eloquent address from the former chair of the Criminal Bar Association Jo Sidhu KC. The down at hand made Locke shoe barristers have settled for a £40m bung but they went on strike and perhaps serve as an example to probation service employees as the lawyers have only been on strike twice and united are proving a force to be reckoned with. There is also the matter of a build up of court cases potentially bringing the entire system to a juddering halt at a politically interesting and sensitive time.

Liz Saville Roberts appeared after conference were treated to Shadow Justice Minister Lord Ponsonby welcoming the @CommonsJustice IPP sentences report and its call for greater probation resourcing.

Liz spoke at length about the importance of the Justice Unions Parliamentary Group that is a surprisingly politically diverse group. Reading between the lines LSR appeared to be saying that they need more evidence from Napo to score points in Parliament and when this happens it has an impact. I think Napo employ someone full time to do this but correct me if I am wrong. I for one have always thought that in the past Napo has been at its best when it makes friends with politicians from different political affiliations through the group as this is how you exert influence and speak truth to power. 

Napo is not tied to a particular political party although as a trade union we might reasonably assume that they are ideologically inclined towards Labour. If they were to box clever however they might discover some MPs in other parties might be receptive to sensible suggestions and spread the word. A well placed question or a timely report can do wonders. I cannot fail to observe that in recent years Napo has become less relevant and it would have been good to hear from the new justice secretary or from Labours shadow justice team about their plans for probation. Failing that Napo could have bagged Rory Stewart who always seems to have something interesting to say and who is apparently available with time on his hands.

Some readers will remember the protest London Branch led at the last conference regarding voting both virtually and regarding remote devices in the hall. This was highlighted after a vote regarding a pretty clear cut motion in support of inclusion and diversity and anti discriminatory practice. Some of their suggestions made then have been adopted but a member from Essex Chris Pearson was moved to comment that people seemed to be pressing all the the wrong buttons as uncontroversial motions with no speakers against still had as many as 14% of members recorded as voting against. Perhaps a test should have been conducted.

Motion 17 Hands off Our Pay saw the return of Napo stalwart Keith Stockeld to the podium. Though no one would perhaps disagree with the sentiment of this somewhat rambling to be reckoned with motion. Its main thrust was to oppose the imposition of a regional pay structure. That battle has it seems already been won so technically Keith should have either withdrawn the motion or tabled an amendment. Ho hum. It was carried anyway so officers and officials can tick any action following the motion immediately as completed.

Motion 26 by Napo Cymru to value experienced staff with an interesting amendment saw veteran Napo activists Su McConnel and David Raho take the podium to propose and speak in support of the motion. Su spoke from the heart about the retention of experienced staff and the need for employers to take urgent action to address the issue. David reminded members that experienced staff were the backbone and lifeblood of the service and made clear that something had to be done to stop the departure of those who often function as the stable core in probation offices. Incredible then that 14% voted against valuing experienced staff. What the …….? Just as things looked to be finally warming up, it was the end and off to fringe meetings.

A Reader

11 comments:

  1. As someone in the room I think it highly possible that those who voted against Su McConnell’s Motion on the grounds that it focused on those over 50 to be surveyed. There were a number in the room who felt it was discriminatory to those individuals who had significant experience in years but were younger. Additionally, the way it was written meant that there was an assumption that if you’re over 50 you’re experienced… this meant that second careers, people who who have come to probation later in life would have been automatically included.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tricky how you measure experience in probation as opposed experience in life. With a large influx of people of a certain age with little experience fresh out of university the former is in ever shorter supply. The point made by the motion was perhaps a generational one as persons of a certain age in probation are leaving at a disproportionately high rate whatever the number of years they have worked in probation and more information about that needs to be gathered as a matter of urgency in addition to any other routine exit interviewing or questionnaire that presumably take place. I thought the point about potential discrimination against other experienced staff was dealt with before the vote. The motion will presumably go to the professional committee and they will make representations to the employers. Not a perfectly articulated motion but good enough with the amendment for most people to get the gist and vote for it. I like the reporter was surprised to see so many voting against as the loss of such people who are the keepers/guardians of our organisational and professional learning (not those who are merely older and life experienced) presumably makes it easier for those in HQ to make radical changes with less challenge on the ground.

      Delete
    2. Excellent commentary and observation of the, at last outgoing and what has clearly been a collusive and failed chair.
      "Katie’s super power is to speak without pause or hesitation for hours on end "
      While this absolutely correct I would just add speaking without knowledge or appropriate research having seen her performance damage Napo in her years .
      As for the pointed accuracy of the general secretary description it is his turn next year to face the judgement of members and I as many don't wish to see him continue. Haveing decimated Napo members terms security representatives favouring managerial collisions. He has reduced Napo to a box office garage address while he spends Napo capital on salary for himself. The question is do members need a sea change for working terms and a better union for our future or would even could we consider the lamentable performance of a man who's reputation is characterised in this way.
      "an unapologetic narcissist and serial grandstander "
      For napos sake time to go.

      Delete
  2. Down by the sea that is so polluted with shit that the traditional Edridge swim is called off. Some members suggesting we go ahead but dont put our heads in the shit. There is some sort of analogy there.
    Perhaps we should replace the Edridge swim with an annual gluing of ourselves to the nearest trunk road

    ReplyDelete
  3. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies today:-

    “Let us strike out now and clear its foul stench from our justice system”

    The words of Lord Garnier, the former government minister, speaking yesterday in a House of Lords debate on the dreadful Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence.

    Discredited and discontinued in 2012, IPP was never abolished retrospectively. To this day, more than 3,000 prisoners remain caught in its coils. Over 600 of those prisoners have served more than ten years over the sentence length originally imposed by the court (the so-called tariff).

    A September report by the House of Commons Justice Committee described IPP as “irredeemably flawed” and called for wholesale reform, including a resentencing exercise for those still under the IPP regime. This would involve converting all existing IPP sentences, which are open-ended, into determinate sentences with an agreed end-date.

    We welcome the Justice Committee report, including the resentencing recommendation, and call for the government to act swiftly and decisively to implement its recommendations. We would also go further.

    For one thing, it cannot be right that, thanks to IPP, prisoners are languishing in prison for years after they have served the tariff originally set by the court. They should be released without delay, and certainly in advance of a resentencing exercise that, even if agreed, could take years to be completed.

    We also argue that those subjected to the IPP sentence should be offered state reparations, on the basis of failures to provide programmes or to meet known mental health needs, and in recognition of the unjustified time in confinement.

    The IPP was probably the worst sentencing ‘innovation’ introduced by the last Labour government. We need to learn the lessons and do our utmost to prevent a similar sentence being introduced in the future.

    You can catch-up on all the work we have been doing on IPP here. I would also encourage you to check out the work of the campaign groups UNGRIPP and IPP Committee in Action, who have been doing important work on this issue.

    Richard Garside
    Director

    ReplyDelete
  4. From Twitter Danny Shaw:-

    "Justice Minister @RobertBuckland tells @CommonsJustice
    probation staff will have a "lower caseload" under new probation system, with more of a mix of cases. Amy Rees, probation DG in Wales, says they're looking to "simplify" the new system, with no payment-by-results element...Both Rees and Barton accept voluntary sector especially small providers, are not involved enough in probation. Barton tells
    @CommonsJustice the new system will have lower barriers for entry for them, because there'll be less financial risk."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't buckland SoS for Wales, not justice minister?... surely that's brandon flowers - oops, sorry, - lewis

      Delete
    2. that must be an old danny shaw post - rees isn't probation DG in wales anymore either

      Delete
    3. Indeed - no idea how that popped up on Twitter - but a reminder for me to pay more attention! Thanks for highlighting as I do try for accuracy.

      Delete
  5. "lower barriers for entry... because there'll be less financial risk."

    Fuck those who are directed to work with probation services, fuck the quality of service provision, fuck the whole concept of working meaningfully with people, fuck the victims of crime... just so long as the finances are safe.

    They just don't give a flying fuck about people.

    Not a single one of them gives a crap.

    Risk, Risk, Risk - risk to £££'s in their pockets is ALL they care about.

    "Too many Serious Further Offence reviews are falling below par, with services not sufficiently identifying the necessary learning"

    But at least the fucking finances are safe. Phew!

    Johnson, Truss et al have publicly demonstrated just exactly how committed they are to their 'closest friends' [parody, for those unaccustomed to nuance], let alone to any concept of professional delivery of services.

    Romeo, Rees, Barton & many, if not all, of their acolytes - they are NOT your friends.

    Accepting the pay deal was not a good idea.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Motion 26 by Napo Cymru to value experienced staff. If this intentionally referred to over 50 year olds only then what a ridiculous suggestion. There are many under 50s that are experienced and with long service. I know many under 50s that have worked for probation longer that most over 50s. I also know a few over 50s who have 30-40 years service who I really wouldn’t consider experienced. Lazy, moany and horrible maybe!

    ReplyDelete