NPS Pay Offer 2020/2021 – MEMBERS BALLOT
Following several months of protracted negotiations between the Probation Unions and the employer, a final pay offer covering NPS staff for 2020/2021 has been received. This has been considered by Napo’s Probation Negotiating Committee who, whilst believing it to be the best achievable offer by negotiation, have decided to ask our members to decide whether this an acceptable offer or should be rejected.
The enclosed ballot pack provides you with a comprehensive analysis of the offer, together with a ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ summary and further information to assist your decision. There is also an easy to use link to an electronic ballot which is open from Noon today and closes at Noon on the 18th December.
Further enquiries about the offer should be referred to your Napo Branch who will liaise as necessary with Napo Link Officers and Napo HQ
Please vote
This is an important ballot and we urge all of our members who are employed by the NPS to take the opportunity to vote.
--oo00oo--
Members asked to vote on 2020/2021 Pay Offer from NPS
Following protracted negotiations between the Probation unions and NPS over several months, the employer provided the unions with a final pay offer for 2020/2021 on 26 November. Napo members are now invited to read this briefing on the offer and then to vote to accept or reject the offer.
PAY OFFER ELEMENTS
The opening pay offer from the NPS for 2020 was made on 14 October and contained the following elements. The offer can be read in full here.
1. Incremental pay progression with effect from 1 April 2020 for all staff who were not yet at the top of their pay band on 31 March 2020. This was paid on account in October salaries, because it was a contractual entitlement, but it still forms part of the overall pay offer. Eligible staff have already progressed to the next highest pay point in their pay band and should have received back pay from 1 April including any back pay in respect of overtime or unsocial hours’ allowances.
2. A non-consolidated, pensionable, payment worth 2% of basic salary for all staff on top of their pay band on 31 March 2020. This compensates for the fact that these staff are not entitled to any incremental pay progression. This payment is a one-off and will not be added to salaries for future years. The monetary value of this payment varies by pay band and the details can be found in the tables supplied by the NPS which are enclosed.
3. In pay band 1, the minimum pay point will be abolished with effect from 1 April 2020 and the remaining single pay point will be increased in value from £17,764 to £18,174 which is an increase of 2.3% in real terms. This means that from 1 April 2020 all staff in pay band 1 will be paid on this single basic salary rate. This change is necessary to keep this pay band above minimum wage.
4. A review of all roles in pay band 1 with the intention of redesigning all roles at that level to align with Pay Band 2. This review will start immediately. NPS is committed to this review, particularly with respect to the agreed objective of phasing out Pay Band 1 from use no later than 1 April 2021. Concurrently, NPS will refrain from hiring any new staff into Pay Band 1 while this review is under way, nor will NPS seek to assimilate any CRC staff who transfer into the NPS in June 2021 into this pay band.
5. The lowest pay point in each pay band is deleted with effect from 1 April 2020. This means that new starters will benefit from a higher starting salary in each pay band and will take less time to reach the top of their pay band than was previously the case. It also means that some of the overlaps between pay bands, which the NPS and unions are committed to reduce, are reduced by one pay point. This impacts particularly on the overlaps between pay bands 4 and 5 and 5 and 6 and all the overlaps between pay bands A, B, C & D.
6. The two lowest pay points in pay bands A & B are deleted with effect from 1 April 2020. This enhances the reduction in the respective pay band overlaps.
UNIONS SECURE IMPROVED OFFER FOLLOWING FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS
Napo’s Probation Negotiating Committee (PNC) considered the above opening pay offer from the employer last month. The Committee noted that the offer gave no real terms increase in the value of any pay point, with the exception of the 2.3% increase to the top of pay band 1. The PNC agreed that the offer was insufficient for Napo to recommend to members and we went back to the NPS, along with our sister unions UNISON and GMB/SCOOP, to seek improvements.
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL PAYMENT – BUT NOT FOR ALL
As a result of the unions efforts to secure additional cash for members, the NPS has now offered an additional special payment to the majority, but not all, of NPS staff in recognition of their efforts in delivering the service during the Covid pandemic while also working towards Probation Reform - see details here. The special payment is not part of the pay award but is a one-off, non-consolidated bonus payment. It will be awarded to eligible staff who were in post on 30th September 2020 and the amount will vary by occupational group. It will be pensionable, pro rata to hours worked and its implementation will be staggered over the months of January to March 2021.
Here is a table which sets out which groups of staff will benefit from the special payment, the numbers in each occupational group, the total gross payment offered before deductions and the proposed month of payment:
Annex A – Proposed Staff cohorts and special payment amounts, (NPS Headcount as at 30 September 2020)
Headcount Proposed Payment(£) Proposed Payment Month
Band 1 185 £350 January
Band 2 Case Administrator 1315 £350 January
AP Residential Worker Band 2 618 £350 January
Band 3 VLOs 181 £250 February
Band 3 PSO* 3034 £250 February
Band 4 Probation Officer 3934 £225 March
Band 5 Senior Probation Officer 879 £200 March
Sum 10146
*Inclusive of PQiPs.
NB.
Where staff were undertaking one of the roles in the table on 30th September 2020, but who do not receive the bonus, line managers and Regional HRBPs will assist with eligibility in the first instance.
The NPS says that it has added this special payment to the offer for the following reasons:
THE PAY OFFER – PROS AND CONS
Taking as read that staff are contractually entitled to pay progression, and setting this aside, here is a summary of the pros and cons of the pay offer:
Pros
1. A 2% non-consolidated payment for staff at the top of their pay band
2. A 2.3% increase in the value of the single pay point in pay band 1
3. The deletion of the bottom pay point in each pay band and the bottom two pay points in pay bands A & B
4. The agreement to review pay band 1 jobs with the agreed objective to redesign these roles to fit pay band 2 by no later than 1 April 2021
5. A special payment scheme for the majority of NPS staff to recognise their contribution to service delivery during Covid
Cons
1. Nil increase in the value of NPS pay points, with the exception of the single pay point in pay band 1. As such, there is no cost of living rise in the pay offer. Probation staff have only received one cost of living rise in the last 10 years.
2. A special payment scheme which excludes a significant minority of NPS staff who have been as much a part of service delivery during Covid as those who are due to receive the special payment.
YOUR CHANCE TO VOTE ON THE OFFER
While Napo believe that this offer remains unsatisfactory, it is the best achievable by negotiation and the Probation Negotiating Committee have exceptionally decided not to make a specific recommendation to members.
We have improved the final offer over and above the opening offer and secured additional money. We will continue to campaign for those staff who have been excluded from the special payment scheme to receive appropriate recognition.
Having read this bulletin and the accompanying information, Napo members are invited to vote to accept or reject the pay offer. Given that this is, in Napo’s view, the best offer available by negotiation, a vote to reject the offer will need to be considered by the PNC in terms of the scope of and willingness of our members to undertake serious and sustained industrial action, up to and including strike action, in order to seek to improve it. Any industrial action could only take place following a further lawful industrial action ballot of relevant members.
Enclosed with this bulletin is:
Members anger over Pay Freeze
Many Napo members have been in touch with us to register their disgust at the Governments cynical decision to implement a public sector pay freeze next year. Given the Government’s shambolic management of the Pandemic and the well-publicised squandering of tax payers money in the procurement process for PPE, and companies who have financed the Tory party, this announcement could not have come at a worse time for public sector workers everywhere. The PNC nevertheless recommended that our members longer term interests would be better served by Napo working with the TUC and all public sector unions in building a campaign of resistance and solidarity against this punitive and unfair policy.
The General Secretary will be attending upcoming meetings of the TUC Public Sector Liaison Group and the TUC General Council and will be reporting back on the developing campaign. It is possible that this will include the likelihood of widespread industrial action and our members being asked to consider their readiness to support this strategy if necessary.
Please vote
Despite the disappointment that members will feel about this pay offer, we are urging you to take the opportunity to cast your vote in this important ballot.
Ian Lawrence General Secretary
Please consider the offer and pay bulletin and ensure that you place your vote by Noon on Friday 18th December 2020.
Members asked to vote on 2020/2021 Pay Offer from NPS
Following protracted negotiations between the Probation unions and NPS over several months, the employer provided the unions with a final pay offer for 2020/2021 on 26 November. Napo members are now invited to read this briefing on the offer and then to vote to accept or reject the offer.
PAY OFFER ELEMENTS
The opening pay offer from the NPS for 2020 was made on 14 October and contained the following elements. The offer can be read in full here.
1. Incremental pay progression with effect from 1 April 2020 for all staff who were not yet at the top of their pay band on 31 March 2020. This was paid on account in October salaries, because it was a contractual entitlement, but it still forms part of the overall pay offer. Eligible staff have already progressed to the next highest pay point in their pay band and should have received back pay from 1 April including any back pay in respect of overtime or unsocial hours’ allowances.
2. A non-consolidated, pensionable, payment worth 2% of basic salary for all staff on top of their pay band on 31 March 2020. This compensates for the fact that these staff are not entitled to any incremental pay progression. This payment is a one-off and will not be added to salaries for future years. The monetary value of this payment varies by pay band and the details can be found in the tables supplied by the NPS which are enclosed.
3. In pay band 1, the minimum pay point will be abolished with effect from 1 April 2020 and the remaining single pay point will be increased in value from £17,764 to £18,174 which is an increase of 2.3% in real terms. This means that from 1 April 2020 all staff in pay band 1 will be paid on this single basic salary rate. This change is necessary to keep this pay band above minimum wage.
4. A review of all roles in pay band 1 with the intention of redesigning all roles at that level to align with Pay Band 2. This review will start immediately. NPS is committed to this review, particularly with respect to the agreed objective of phasing out Pay Band 1 from use no later than 1 April 2021. Concurrently, NPS will refrain from hiring any new staff into Pay Band 1 while this review is under way, nor will NPS seek to assimilate any CRC staff who transfer into the NPS in June 2021 into this pay band.
5. The lowest pay point in each pay band is deleted with effect from 1 April 2020. This means that new starters will benefit from a higher starting salary in each pay band and will take less time to reach the top of their pay band than was previously the case. It also means that some of the overlaps between pay bands, which the NPS and unions are committed to reduce, are reduced by one pay point. This impacts particularly on the overlaps between pay bands 4 and 5 and 5 and 6 and all the overlaps between pay bands A, B, C & D.
6. The two lowest pay points in pay bands A & B are deleted with effect from 1 April 2020. This enhances the reduction in the respective pay band overlaps.
UNIONS SECURE IMPROVED OFFER FOLLOWING FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS
Napo’s Probation Negotiating Committee (PNC) considered the above opening pay offer from the employer last month. The Committee noted that the offer gave no real terms increase in the value of any pay point, with the exception of the 2.3% increase to the top of pay band 1. The PNC agreed that the offer was insufficient for Napo to recommend to members and we went back to the NPS, along with our sister unions UNISON and GMB/SCOOP, to seek improvements.
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL PAYMENT – BUT NOT FOR ALL
As a result of the unions efforts to secure additional cash for members, the NPS has now offered an additional special payment to the majority, but not all, of NPS staff in recognition of their efforts in delivering the service during the Covid pandemic while also working towards Probation Reform - see details here. The special payment is not part of the pay award but is a one-off, non-consolidated bonus payment. It will be awarded to eligible staff who were in post on 30th September 2020 and the amount will vary by occupational group. It will be pensionable, pro rata to hours worked and its implementation will be staggered over the months of January to March 2021.
Here is a table which sets out which groups of staff will benefit from the special payment, the numbers in each occupational group, the total gross payment offered before deductions and the proposed month of payment:
Annex A – Proposed Staff cohorts and special payment amounts, (NPS Headcount as at 30 September 2020)
Headcount Proposed Payment(£) Proposed Payment Month
Band 1 185 £350 January
Band 2 Case Administrator 1315 £350 January
AP Residential Worker Band 2 618 £350 January
Band 3 VLOs 181 £250 February
Band 3 PSO* 3034 £250 February
Band 4 Probation Officer 3934 £225 March
Band 5 Senior Probation Officer 879 £200 March
Sum 10146
*Inclusive of PQiPs.
NB.
Where staff were undertaking one of the roles in the table on 30th September 2020, but who do not receive the bonus, line managers and Regional HRBPs will assist with eligibility in the first instance.
The NPS says that it has added this special payment to the offer for the following reasons:
- ‘We are looking to make the payment to these staff on the basis of the display of significant levels of resilience and professionalism, going above and beyond their normal duties, during this prolonged period of exceptional delivery. Staff have also professionally navigated transformation reforms ahead of unification in June 2021.’
- ‘We believe these staff have contributed to the successful implementation of the offender management exceptional delivery model, whilst maintaining service standards in an ever-changing environment and under additional pressures. They have also needed to adapt to significant changes in the way they deliver their public protection roles and duties, delivering services innovatively whilst maintaining the standards they are held to by the Department and the community.’
EXCLUSIONS FROM SPECIAL PAYMENT
The fact that the special payment is being withheld from some staff is extremely disappointing and will undoubtedly damage morale for those excluded groups. Napo obviously called on the NPS to award the special payment across the board to all staff, but because of Treasury restrictions they were not able to agree. The NPS has not been willing, or able, to confirm which occupational groups are specifically excluded from the special payment which makes it very difficult for Napo to communicate the offer properly to members. This is obviously very regrettable.
There is no doubt that the groups of staff excluded from the special payments scheme have displayed the same ‘…levels of resilience and professionalism, going above and beyond their normal duties, during this prolonged period of exceptional delivery…’, as the staff who will receive the special payment. Their exclusion is therefore unfair.
Napo will continue to campaign for those staff who have been excluded from the special payment to receive appropriate recognition. We will be asking our reps and branches to compile a list of all the excluded jobs with this in mind, and we will be calling on Regional Probation Directors to consider utilising the reward and recognition budget within their areas. If you are in one of the excluded groups, please contact your Napo Branch to help us draw up this list.
The fact that the special payment is being withheld from some staff is extremely disappointing and will undoubtedly damage morale for those excluded groups. Napo obviously called on the NPS to award the special payment across the board to all staff, but because of Treasury restrictions they were not able to agree. The NPS has not been willing, or able, to confirm which occupational groups are specifically excluded from the special payment which makes it very difficult for Napo to communicate the offer properly to members. This is obviously very regrettable.
There is no doubt that the groups of staff excluded from the special payments scheme have displayed the same ‘…levels of resilience and professionalism, going above and beyond their normal duties, during this prolonged period of exceptional delivery…’, as the staff who will receive the special payment. Their exclusion is therefore unfair.
Napo will continue to campaign for those staff who have been excluded from the special payment to receive appropriate recognition. We will be asking our reps and branches to compile a list of all the excluded jobs with this in mind, and we will be calling on Regional Probation Directors to consider utilising the reward and recognition budget within their areas. If you are in one of the excluded groups, please contact your Napo Branch to help us draw up this list.
THE PAY OFFER – PROS AND CONS
Taking as read that staff are contractually entitled to pay progression, and setting this aside, here is a summary of the pros and cons of the pay offer:
Pros
1. A 2% non-consolidated payment for staff at the top of their pay band
2. A 2.3% increase in the value of the single pay point in pay band 1
3. The deletion of the bottom pay point in each pay band and the bottom two pay points in pay bands A & B
4. The agreement to review pay band 1 jobs with the agreed objective to redesign these roles to fit pay band 2 by no later than 1 April 2021
5. A special payment scheme for the majority of NPS staff to recognise their contribution to service delivery during Covid
Cons
1. Nil increase in the value of NPS pay points, with the exception of the single pay point in pay band 1. As such, there is no cost of living rise in the pay offer. Probation staff have only received one cost of living rise in the last 10 years.
2. A special payment scheme which excludes a significant minority of NPS staff who have been as much a part of service delivery during Covid as those who are due to receive the special payment.
YOUR CHANCE TO VOTE ON THE OFFER
While Napo believe that this offer remains unsatisfactory, it is the best achievable by negotiation and the Probation Negotiating Committee have exceptionally decided not to make a specific recommendation to members.
We have improved the final offer over and above the opening offer and secured additional money. We will continue to campaign for those staff who have been excluded from the special payment scheme to receive appropriate recognition.
Having read this bulletin and the accompanying information, Napo members are invited to vote to accept or reject the pay offer. Given that this is, in Napo’s view, the best offer available by negotiation, a vote to reject the offer will need to be considered by the PNC in terms of the scope of and willingness of our members to undertake serious and sustained industrial action, up to and including strike action, in order to seek to improve it. Any industrial action could only take place following a further lawful industrial action ballot of relevant members.
Enclosed with this bulletin is:
- An electronic ballot paper which you are invited to complete below. The closing date for voting is 12 noon on Friday 18 December 2020.
- A set of NPS tables on the following elements of the offer (click here to view):
- the monetary amount of non-consolidated payments for staff on the top of their pay band, by each pay band
- the new pay band minimum pay points following the deletion of the lowest pay points in each band
- the changes to pay band 1
- the new pay bands showing all pay points
Members anger over Pay Freeze
Many Napo members have been in touch with us to register their disgust at the Governments cynical decision to implement a public sector pay freeze next year. Given the Government’s shambolic management of the Pandemic and the well-publicised squandering of tax payers money in the procurement process for PPE, and companies who have financed the Tory party, this announcement could not have come at a worse time for public sector workers everywhere. The PNC nevertheless recommended that our members longer term interests would be better served by Napo working with the TUC and all public sector unions in building a campaign of resistance and solidarity against this punitive and unfair policy.
The General Secretary will be attending upcoming meetings of the TUC Public Sector Liaison Group and the TUC General Council and will be reporting back on the developing campaign. It is possible that this will include the likelihood of widespread industrial action and our members being asked to consider their readiness to support this strategy if necessary.
Please vote
Despite the disappointment that members will feel about this pay offer, we are urging you to take the opportunity to cast your vote in this important ballot.
Ian Lawrence General Secretary
Katie Lomas National Chair
--oo00oo--
26 November 2020
NATIONAL PROBATION SERVICE (NPS) SPECIAL PAYMENT (WITHOUT PREJUDICE)
Following our letter of 16 October, we write to you to provide details of a special payment we intend to provide to designated staff (Annex A) as at 30 September 2020.
We are looking to make the payment to these staff on the basis of the display of significant levels of resilience and professionalism, going above and beyond their normal duties, during this prolonged period of exceptional delivery. Staff have also professionally navigated transformation reforms ahead of unification in June 2021.
We believe these staff have contributed to the successful implementation of the offender management exceptional delivery model, whilst maintaining service standards in an ever-changing environment and under additional pressures. They have also needed to adapt to significant changes in the way they deliver their public protection roles and duties, delivering services innovatively whilst maintaining the standards they are held to by the Department and the community.
Successful onboarding of Wales CRC staff has already occurred, and additional preparations are well underway for onboarding the remainder of the external cohorts across England and Wales. Staff have engaged in preparatory work to ensure that smooth transitions take place, in an already challenging environment, with a commitment to ensuring service standards are maintained and that no service users are left behind, and the public are protected.
We want to acknowledge that it is unprecedented to provide bonus payments to so many staff, but we really do believe this reflects the exceptional circumstances and response by those staff, to a once in a generation set of challenges. We recognise that all staff have been impacted in some way by the extraordinary events of the past 10 months, and in preparation for unification. Therefore, we have tried to recognise individual contribution broadly but appropriately through the provision of these payments.
These proposed payments will be on a pro-rata basis, and we propose to pay them in a staggered approach, as noted in Annex A.
Furthermore, there are various wellbeing options we wish to extend to all staff in addition to the above.
Special / Annual Leave
Our Special Leave policy allows discretion for managers to agree to time off that is appropriate to individual circumstances. We have already relaxed our rules for COVID19 reasons and will continue offer line manager flexibilities as necessary.
MoJ encourages employees and their managers to apply good practice when applying for and granting annual leave. It is important that we continue to encourage staff to take annual leave where they can to allow for rest away from work and to maintain their resilience and wellbeing. The Working Time (Coronavirus) Regs 2020 provide some flexibility to carry over leave for the next two years where employees have not been able to take all their annual leave within their annual leave year as a result of COVID19.
We are reviewing our policy on allowing the buying and selling of leave to expand to 5 days (subject to consultation) and are considering expanding this incentive to HMPPS staff more broadly post COVID.
Where an employee is impacted by the coronavirus, but not sick, managers should be flexible and consider use of paid special leave where other options including working from home, working from a different workplace, working different attendance patterns or redeploying to a suitable different role cannot reasonably be achieved.
Each case should be treated sensitively and on its own merits and employees may need to take more than one period of paid special leave – or a continuous period where this is necessary. The usual limits on special leave do not apply and managers can use their discretion to agree what is appropriate.
New Employee Benefits
Moving away from the Employee Benefits strategy adopted by other government departments, MOJ have taken a dual supplier approach, delivering greater value and flexibility to all NPS employees.
Whilst Edenred will continue to deliver all existing employee discounts, Salary Sacrifice Schemes and provide vouchers for Reward and Recognition, a new supplier, Xexec, is being introduced to bring Enhanced Employee Rewards.
Xexec will be delivering several creative and innovative ways to promote wellbeing, reward and bring value to NPS employees, these include:
- Free perks to all NPS employees in the form of either; a monthly beverage at a high street coffee shop or a quarterly digital download in the form of movie, e-book or audio book
- Cash back schemes that can be used on top other retailer discounts available through Xexec A Reward and Recognition catalogue, where NPS employees can be rewarded in more creative ways beyond ‘traditional’ vouchers. The catalogue will include; boxes of chocolates, flowers, hampers and a range experience day (spa days, afternoon tea for two, driving experience, paint balling!)
- Opportunities to expand the service to include online fitness and exercise classes
- Easier access to Xexec services through a dedicated mobile App
In addition to the introduction of the new service delivered by Xexec, we have implemented a significant improvement to the Cycle to Work scheme. Increasing the limit from £1000 to £2500. This will provide greater access to cycles of a higher value, bringing e-bikes, tricycles and high-end cycles into scope, and encouraging and enabling greater engagement with the scheme across all NPS employees.
Yours sincerely
Ian Barrow Executive Director Probation Workforce Programme
Via email:-
ReplyDelete"NAPO have circulated the outrageous pay offer which is 9 months overdue and likely to be the last payment of any kind for years to come. This is published in the same week as HMPPS announce a strategy to attempt to retain the services of older employees, particularly those thinking about retirement.
The two actions are not compatible. This pay offer is totally unacceptable, so it is now up to the membership to show what they are prepared to do in order to maintain our standard of living and to keep the tail lights of parity with similar professionals in view bearing in mind the three and four percent pay rises awarded to them at the start of the financial year."
I'm one of the "older" employees and on the top of my pay scale. When is this non-consolidated insult meant to land in my pay? Let's not forget the scrapping of the 85 year rule, which seems to amount to the NPS strategy of ensuring no-one can afford to retire. That year coincided with me leaving NAPO, never to return.
DeleteVia email:-
ReplyDelete"NPS pay offer from HMPpS - Thanks for nothing
Just when you thought things couldn’t get much worse well then came the pay offer for 2020/21 Or absence of one. So thank you for the zero pay rise. That’s now ten years & only one cost of living increase; and not much hope of one anytime soon. This effects our CRC members to, who will be coming across to the NPS pay rates next summer, so everyone is impacted.
It’s easy to talk the talk but the real test is if you can walk the walk and deliver positive outcomes to the organisation you lead. Well the heads of HMPpS /NPS get paid big bucks but what exactly do they do to add value to staff and service users?
Much messaging from the top table thanking you for being hidden hero’s/valued, dedicated & committed staff etc and all they have managed is to find a few pennies down the back of settee to try to fob most (not even all) of NPS staff. They should be embarrassed & ashamed. Better surely to give that lose change to those people who are really struggling to survive in our communities. We don’t want a last minute handout, we want a proper pay rise.
If you vote to reject this offer please do so with a commitment to take action that has an impact. There is much we can do. But if we doing nothing now we face being ignored for time to come & seen as a soft touch.
Ultimately, it is each individuals decision about whether this is a fair & reasonable offer. We have jobs & get paid. We all have friends & neighbours who have lost jobs or are really struggling financially and / or emotionally out there. Many folk are in a much worst place than us but that is no reason not to fight for our and others, basic right to decent pay and conditions that reflect who we are & what we do.
We will try to arrange a Zoom to discuss so watch this space.
Enjoy the weekend & don’t forget your sunscreen!
Dave Bellingham
“interim” NPS Chair; NAPO East Midlands Branch."
No more than I expected.Another effective pay cut and dont forget members your pension fund has been eroded by at least 20% by acceptance of non consolidated pay awards. I can appreciate now may not be the best time to take a stand however how long are we going to allow this to continue? I as an older member may work out my final years without jumping ship. Younger members need to consider whether they are prepared to work all their lives in a profession that is under valued a poorly paid. I am so angry. The daily grind of having to penny pinch to get by is impacting on my mental health
ReplyDeleteSo to summarise:
ReplyDelete"The pay offer for 2020/21 is 0%. NAPO feel this is the best offer that can be achieved through negotiation and so are putting to members to vote."
You couldn't make it up.
As a reminder, some of the cost of living increases awarded to public sector workers in 2020/21:
Teachers: 3.1%
Doctors: 2.8%
Police: 2.5%
Prisons: 2.5%
What happens if it's voted against? Does that just mean there is no pay award at all for 2020/21?
Yes indeed cowardly leadership of a no deal . Why on earth this was not rejected out of hand with some stipulation to harmonise all pay in June. They either don't understand their jobs or are working for NPS.
ReplyDeleteSodexo CRC's announced a £300 special payment for all staff yesterday, across all grades, in recognition of commitment and hard work during 1st lockdown. To be paid in December.
ReplyDeleteWell I'll go on f*ckin strike. F*ckin furious. I'd lose a day or two pay but having a good shout outside the office would be good for my #wellbeing.
ReplyDeleteuk no-deal-is-the-best-deal-we-can-expect-but-we're-still-talking-about-doing-a-no-deal-deal govt covid-19 data sat 5/12/20
ReplyDeletenew cases: 15,500 positive tests
deaths (per 28 day rules): 397, which totals 2,986 for the last seven days
Responding to the BMJ article that the lateral flow tests, which do not require processing in a laboratory, were reported to have missed half of all cases and a third of those with a high viral load who were likely to be the most infectious, Dr Susan Hopkins, chief medical adviser, NHS Test and Trace, accepted there had been "false negatives" but ...
"What we are doing here is case detection. We are not saying people do not have the disease if their test is negative. We are trying to say [to people who test positive] 'You do have the disease and now we want you to go and isolate for 10 days.' That is a whole different game-changer."
Sounds very much like she's been mentored by Ursula Brennan. Remember the dizzy dame from those heady days of shafting probation inside-out back in 2014?
“What I am trying to say is that we are not saying, “Here is how we do it now. We are going to do something that adds cost to it.” We are saying, “Here are all the costs now. They are going to lie in different places, and the procedures are going to look different.” So we are not simply saying, “Here is a process, we are adding cost to it.” We are saying, “Here is a process that is going to operate in a different way.”
One of the big problems is that local union chairs appear to be so deeply bedded in with divisional directors that they're practically exchanging bodily fluids. In London we've been witness to this unwholesome and embarrassing coupling for 18 months. NAPO and Unison London leads vying for the favour of our unworthy and bullish director who controls her Heads of Service by fear and threat.. something I've very often witnessed first hand at meetings. This spectacle is regularly trotted out at cringy MS Teams all-staff love-ins where Unison and Napo reps agree that we've responded admirably to Covid and that unions and management have 'never worked so well together'. These pitiful pawns have been talking about this pay offer to members for weeks, but never revealing the figures. Until suddenly.. here it is - 0%. Will be cancelling my subscription on Monday, after years of trying to keep the faith. As a mother of 3 in rented accommodation in the capital I just can't justify the outlay anymore. Don't worry though, Ian Lawrence will still have a very prosperous New Year on almost 3 times my pay.
ReplyDeleteAgree with your position the Napo command surrenders a long time back and is looking for his gong.
DeleteSurely we would be better off without napo. What have they actually done for us over the last 5 years. Everyone should be part of a union I believe, however, I would not encourage colleagues to join napo. I'm not in the nps so cannot vote but this pitiful offer has made my decision to cancel my membership.
DeleteI've witnessed first hand that even when you have a decent rep who does care, Napo itself will throw you under a bus if you need their direct support. Ve heard of others whi have had that experience also. The amount they charge is high and they get their reps to deal with everything within their own nps pay packet. They are a waste of space. I'd say go elsewhere as nps would love it if there were no collective arguments and would run roughshod over individuals. It's a horrible place to work now and you have to hope you have a decent spo as there are some left. In the Labour Market as it is little choice to go elsewhere. Only thing you can do is protect yourself as best you can.
DeleteVery true sadly. Napo has reduced it's skill base to almost zero. One of the worst staff has left. Now if Lawrence were to go perhaps we could rebuild Napo . Restore it's values operate the Constitution and attract back real Napo activists not the lawro sichophants .
DeleteTrade unions I think have a much reduced capacity in today's world. Partly caused by Government legislation aimed at suppressing their bargaining powers, and partly in the way the Labour market of today is organised, deskilled and transient, which inpacts greatly on union membership.
DeleteBut there's another issue too. No longer do those that lead the unions have the thick sausage fingers and calloused hands of those who have spent a life time on the shop floor or at the coalface, today's leaders have the manicured hands and expensive suits of the corporate business person.
Many of those at the top are there for personal achievement and ambition, not because they have an innate desire to protect a profession or the rights of those within that profession.
I find it difficult to say that without mentioning Mike Rolfe who not long ago commented regularly on this blog about all things probation. It was the time he had eyes on the NAPO chair and sought to garner support to assist him achieving that goal.
Once a prison governor, then part of the POA executive, to Labour candidate, to NAPO chair candidate, to Conservative candidate.
I find it hard to accept that those are the credentials of someone that will have the best interests of a profession at heart if elected leader, and his interest in probation a well as his fighting talk comments ended very abruptly when he failed to achieve the position he sought.
I think the unions executives have become very corporate and self sustaining in their nature, being at the top means having to tread a delicate path where protecting your own executive position is balanced against the protections of the membership your charged to represent.
https://web.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/complabstuds/confsem/Fairbrother.htm
'Getafix
So what you're saying, Getafix, is that those we pay specifically to manage our collective representation are only in it for themselves. Dystopic beyond belief. I suppose it reflects the changing position of senior managers over the years... from Probation-oriented long-serving rehabilitationists willing (at least sometimes) to make the case to govt, to career civil servants ready to accept and cascade any message from on-high as long as it feathers their own nest. Its all pretty depressing stuff. Wasn't going to start on that bottle until sundown, but think I'll just have a little glass now...
DeleteMike Rolfe history not quite right getafix. He ran for national general secretary. Got close 2nd place to the incumbent . To did not demonstrate the skills in his tardy blog responses. He was helped into the competition by a secretive group involving the then chairs and it was widely alleged included the incumbents number 2. It was a race of two the bad and the useless. Neither have done Napo members any good . Rolfe off to the Tories is no more daft than Lawrence who does not do his basic job. Shiny Suits cheap tie beer drinking and hand pressing smarm is not what members need.
DeleteMaybe those same union bods are hoping for special treatment as a reward?
ReplyDelete"A close friend of the prime minister and his fiancee was given an official position at the Home Office without the role being publicly advertised, a freedom of information request has revealed.
Nimco Ali, who is reportedly godmother to the son of Carrie Symonds and Boris Johnson, was appointed adviser on tackling violence against women and girls in October.
Information released under the Freedom of Information Act to The Critic magazine revealed that she was hired via a “direct appointment process”, without open competition or advertisement for the job.
It appears the role may have been created for Ali, with no mention of it before her appointment. She is paid £350 a day and works two days a month."
Long shot from outside Number Ten which flies-in through first floor window to sound of frantic muttering and cursing; as the mutterings become more audible we see PM throwing cushions & moving furniture around the room; "Follow the money, there ain't no money, follow the money, there ain't no mon.... oh, hang on, guess who's just found a few million smackeroos behind this chaise longue. Who's a clever Boris? I am! Phwoooaarrr!! Cazza! Quick! Quick! Who can we give this to before Dishi Rishi finds it?"
Jim's mate Piers Morgan will be loving this news:
ReplyDelete"British singer Rita Ora has apologised after reports emerged that she should have been self-isolating when she celebrated her birthday at a London restaurant last month.
The 30-year-old flew to Egypt in a private jet on 21 November to perform at the five-star W Hotel in Cairo, an appearance for which she was paid a six-figure sum, the Mail on Sunday reported.
She returned to England the next day and was required, as per government quarantine rules, to self-isolate for 14 days."
As has been said on this blog several times, the wealthy & the entitled & the priveleged simply do as they please, regardless of the pandemic, regardles of the rules/guidance etc etc. Private jets, private yachts, the cover of 'essential business travel', private & secure estates to hide in.
Levelling up, all in it together - its all perfectly normal.
Why are probation staff complaining about pay? Didn't they read Amy Rees's letter about "Xexec"? Uh? Is that a redacted form of Seetec?
ReplyDelete"Xexec will be delivering several creative and innovative ways to promote wellbeing, reward and bring value to NPS employees, these include:
* Free perks to all NPS employees in the form of either; a monthly beverage at a high street coffee shop or a quarterly digital download in the form of movie, e-book or audio book
* Cash back schemes that can be used on top other retailer discounts available through Xexec
* A Reward and Recognition catalogue, where NPS employees can be rewarded in more creative ways beyond ‘traditional’ vouchers. The catalogue will include; boxes of chocolates, flowers, hampers and a range experience day (spa days, afternoon tea for two, driving experience, paint balling!)
* Opportunities to expand the service to include online fitness and exercise classes"
But such 'treats' don't come cheap. Xexec managed to turnover some £40m in 2018, from which the two directors - Jacqueline & Seth - pocketed £300,000.
Wonder what reward & recognition will be handed to Napo "for services rendered" ?
All purchased on the Tesco club card so next year's treats cost nothing.
DeleteHow many Green Shield stamps equals one years service?
The original stamps showed a printed face value of 0.075d making each stamp worth 0.03p today. A single stamp was issued for every 6d or 2.5p spent.
DeleteSo for your £30,000 salary you would have been issued with 1.2m stamps
But to have enough stamps at face-value equal to your £30,000 salary you would need to collect 1bn stamps, or fill 781,250 Saver Books.
A Saver Book contained 1,280 stamps. In the 1965 catalogue some of the top gifts were:
Regentone 19" television - 88 books
Longines 9ct Gold watch - 39½ books
Kodak Brownie 8 Movie Camera - 13¼ books
Silver Cloud motor boat (but no outboard motor) - 170 books
You could fly with Green Shield Stamps; they could be used as whole or part payment for a flight with BOAC.
For the motor boat you would need 217,600 stamps; meaning an outlay on petrol & groceries of £5,440 - the price of a large detached house at that time.
Anon 16:09 Just one of the many reasons I love this blog :-)
DeleteGreen Shield stamps are still being traded on ebay!
DeleteStamp War
A "Stamp War" broke out in 1963/4. Fine Fare starting giving away the American S & H Pink Stamps. Green Shield Stamps were being given away by Tesco and Priceright and other stamp companies competed aggressively for outlets.
Lord Sainsbury opposed trading stamps. He formed the Distributive Trades Alliance comprising Boots, John Lewis, Marks and Spencer, W H Smith and other leading retailers. This challenge lead to an Act of Parliament to regulate the stamp companies. Fine Fare dropped stamps, but Green Shield Stamps remained popular for many years after this.
Nazis in The Cabinet. Tories are the Nasty Party? How about The Nazi Party? - I am so fucking angry - I've just watched idiot minister George Eustace interviewed on Sophy Ridge, Sky News - he could not bring himself to condemn the boos & monkey-chants from Milwall football fans directed at players taking the knee yesterday. It was like listening to Trump.
ReplyDeleteTake off your hood & Resign, Eustace.
White Noise - an audio-visual interference pattern that can lead to temporary, selective loss of sound & vision at times of great inconvenience. In more extreme cases it can lead to a permanent loss of humanity.
DeleteCome on is anyone really surprised! It took 15 years to reach the top of my pay band with one cost of living pay rise in a decade. That means my pension is worth so much less. As an 'older' worker they will find they get squat back. I am surprised they wish to retain some of us because this awkward 'older' worker will from tomorrow become somewhat unbearable. They do not treat me like a valued employee, I mean I am 'old', so I treat them like the lousy beings they are stinking the whole rotten place up. Is 'older' allowed....oh sorry forgot I do not matter!! They can go royally shaft themselves rigid.
ReplyDeleteuk milwall-boys-stand-back-and-stand-by govt covid-19 data sun 6/12/20
ReplyDeletenew cases: 17,272 positive tests
deaths (28 day rules): 231 (weekend delays may apply)
This govt has form for being comfortable with racism and there are innumerable examples of Bozo's explicit racist views & his efforts to protect his racist chums.:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/andrew-sabisky-resigns-news-eugenics-boris-johnson-cummings-kwarteng-a9341436.html
"On Mr Sabisky's past writings, Mr Kwarteng said: "It was completely reprehensible – they were racist remarks.”
The outspoken attack is in stark contrast to Monday’s extraordinary No 10 briefing, in which the prime minister’s spokesman repeatedly refused to criticise Mr Sabisky."
Eustice also has form with UKIP (as has his Tory mate Craig McKinlay, MP for South Thanet), standing as a candidate in 1999, a time when the party was happily aligned with the BNP - "Farage was photographed meeting with BNP activists. [Michael] Holmes took over as party leader, and in the 1999 European Parliament elections UKIP received 6.5% of the vote and three seats"
FranK.
Oh look, here they come, racing to Racist George's defence:
Delete"speaking on LBC Radio, Cleverly said the players were “acting in a way that demonstrates solidarity with those people fighting racism and those who have been the victims of racism. Booing that is completely wrong, I’m totally comfortable saying that.”
In a different interview on Monday with Times Radio, Tory MP James Cleverly said Eustice had "been misinterpreted in some of what he said."
No. No. NO! There was NO misinterpretation. Eustice stated that BLM was a political organisation he disagreed with and DID NOT, AT ANY POINT IN HIS SKY INTERVIEW, condemn the booing by the racist fans.
Last Minute Brexit Breakthrough!!
ReplyDeleteUnspecified amount of fishing to be allowed in unspecified areas of waters by unspecified fishing vessels of unspecified origin; meanwhile UK to make unspecified commitment to unspecified commitments for an unspecified period of time relating to unspecified changes to unspecified EU laws.
Always knew we were in safe hands! (FFS!)
FranK.
Probation staff think they've been hard done to, having what they're entitled to stolen from under their noses? It may be they can empathise with Donald Trump!
ReplyDelete* "...I WON THE ELECTION, BIG."
I've never really bothered to look properly at HMPPS webpages before. This is on their headline page (like Napo, they clearly don't bother proof-reading either):
ReplyDelete"What we do
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is to here to prevent victims by changing lives.
We work with our partners to carry out the sentences given by the courts, either in custody or the community.
We reduce reoffending by rehabilitating the people in our care through education and employment. The agency is made up of Her Majesty’s Prison Service, the National Probation Service and a headquarters focussed on creating tools and learning.
Responsibilities
Within England and Wales, we are responsible for:
* running prison and probation services
* rehabilitation services for people in our care leaving prison
* making sure support is available to stop people reoffending
* contract managing private sector prisons and services such as:
- the prisoner escort service
- electronic tagging
Through HM Prison Service: we manage public sector prisons and the contract for private prisons in England and Wales.
Through the National Probation Service: we oversee probation delivery in England and Wales including through community rehabilitation companies.
Priorities
We will deliver the government’s vision and investment to make prisons places of safety and reform, and to continue to transform our work in the community."
Shameless plug for an amazing book (I get nowt for posting this, by the way -FranK).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.versobooks.com/books/2315-inventing-the-future
"A major new manifesto for the end of capitalism
Neoliberalism isn’t working. Austerity is forcing millions into poverty and many more into precarious work, while the left remains trapped in stagnant political practices that offer no respite.
Inventing the Future is a bold new manifesto for life after capitalism. Against the confused understanding of our high-tech world by both the right and the left, this book claims that the emancipatory and future-oriented possibilities of our society can be reclaimed. Instead of running from a complex future, Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams demand a postcapitalist economy capable of advancing standards, liberating humanity from work and developing technologies that expand our freedoms.
This new edition includes a new chapter where Srnicek and Williams respond to their various critics."
Now on offer - what better way to spend £5.99 on someone you love!?