Why CRC pay is a top priority
Its hardly surprising that the NPS pay out has caused some predictable resentment among our members in the CRC estate.
In my letter to the Secretary of State David Gauke - CLICK HERE - which picked up on the mandate given to us by the AGM in Southport, I made it very clear that the NPS pay modernisation deal must be replicated and spelt out very clearly why we are campaigning to achieve pay parity between NPS and CRC staff.
Its an issue that I have raised personally with Justice Select Committee Chair Bob Neill MP, the Probation Programme Engagement Forum where we are arguing for contract adjustments now and in any future versions that see the light of day in 2020. I am also signing off a personalised letters to every CRC Chief Executive within the next few days which will seek their support in lobbying the MoJ for more cash.
Our campaign and communications team here are working on specific recruitment material for CRC staff which will make it very clear that pay parity won’t simply be achieved by us simply shouting louder and why increasing membership density is an important factor in making employers sit up and take notice that their workforce will no longer be prepared to take every rubbish pay offer that comes their way.
Struggle
All of this as I have said on numerous occasions, will be a struggle. If further proof were needed then take a look at the reply just in from David Gauke to my earlier letter which trots out the same insulting response that we hear from any number of people that the CRC employers are separate entities for pay purposes, despite them having received an additional half a billion pounds in taxpayers funding to shore up their failures.
This situation has been compounded by the refusal of CRC owners to support their chief executives to pay more to their staff and/or at least give a commitment that if they should bid for the proposed new CRC contracts, those bids will include pay parity if it has not been achieved by 2020. Our campaign work locally is being taken forward by your Napo National Officials in partnership with your reps who will be pleased to explain this activity in more detail. I can also say that National Chair Katie Lomas and I are prepared to attend member and prospective member meetings upon request.
Victory is possible
I well remember being involved in similar campaigns in years past. One especially, where the private provider had won contracts from Government and were presiding over a four-tier workforce. As you would expect, the union tried reason, then tried persuasion but then spelt out to staff in very stark terms that it was only strength in numbers that was going to make an immediate impact, rather than a drawn out campaign of expectation that the employer thought it could simply bat off.
Within weeks, union membership had increased from around 30% to nearly 100%. Suddenly the attitude of the employer changed markedly and negotiations started to be taken much more seriously.
Our position was strengthened by an increasing willingness by members to take collective action which, in the end did not become necessary, as we eventually reached a ground breaking deal with the employer.
The message is as stark and simple and relevant today as it was to those workers back then. Join a union and help to empower yourselves.
Napo addresses new starters event
To further reinforce the above point, Last week Katie and I addressed around 130 new starters at an event hosted by the Probation Institute and appreciation to Helen Schofield and her team for the opportunity. Here is what I had to say prior to a hugely enjoyable Q&A.
Thursday 6 th December 2018
Good afternoon and many thanks to the Probation Institute for this opportunity to speak with you today at this hugely successful event. Can I also wish you all the very best with your studies as you approach qualification and hope that you have acquired vital knowledge and experience during your time within the service so far.
Good afternoon and many thanks to the Probation Institute for this opportunity to speak with you today at this hugely successful event. Can I also wish you all the very best with your studies as you approach qualification and hope that you have acquired vital knowledge and experience during your time within the service so far.
With me is Napo National Chair Katie Lomas (a serving practitioner who well understands the challenges that our members are experiencing. Can I say how appreciative we are of the important work carried out by the Institute in what are incredibly testing times for anyone delivering Probation services in a Criminal Justice System. I make no apologies for saying that you have committed to an especially challenging career path but one that performs a vital public service in assisting clients and safeguarding our communities.
As Helen said earlier, I am the General Secretary of Napo an elected position covering a five year period and I am now six months in already to my second term.
My duties as the senior elected employee within Napo include the responsibility for assisting our members in Probation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Family Court Service. Typically, my work alongside elected Officers and Napo staff, involves high level interface with government ministers, the senior leadership of the Official Opposition and a multitude of cross party politicians and senior NPS/ HMPPS and MoJ departmental heads.
I am also the lead spokesperson for Napo in our regular contact with TV and media and, as part of the day job, I also have a negotiating role with the three CRC Contracts in Wales and the South West which keeps me well in touch with the issues being faced by our members.
Within the wider union world, I am on the Executive Committee of the General Federation of Trade Unions and I represent BAME workers from various unions as a member of the TUC General Council.
Within the wider union world, I am on the Executive Committee of the General Federation of Trade Unions and I represent BAME workers from various unions as a member of the TUC General Council.
I will have a bit to say about Napo a bit later and why I hope you may consider joining us, and Katie and I will be pleased to try and answer any immediate questions that you may have, or you may contact either of us via info@napo.org.uk afterwards.
I wanted to focus on three specific issues which I hope will be of interest to you
I wanted to focus on three specific issues which I hope will be of interest to you
Firstly the landscape 4 years on from Transforming Rehabilitation
Whether or not TR is the much vaunted revolution that Mr Grayling said it would be, and I could use a variety of adjectives to describe it, there are a litany of problems facing staff wherever they work.
Within the NPS there are still staff shortages despite the efforts to encourage recruitment and enlarge the diversity base, staff are consistently telling us about the pressures of higher than expected workloads, the impact on their health and for those working in Approved Premises, the dreadful effects of the outsourcing of double waking night cover arrangements.
Additionally, we have major concerns over the OMIC project on which Katie Lomas leads for Napo.
Napo and our sister unions recently secured a pay settlement covering NPS staff which represented a long awaited breakthrough on pay modernisation, especially pay progression, where our hard work has helped to cut the time it will take you to reach the top of your payband from 25 years to 6. That achievement has not happened by magic its down to the long term campaign and sheer hard work that Napo has been part of.
On the back of this we are stepping up our campaign to return to genuine collective bargaining across the NPS and CRC’s so that we have common standards of employment and rates of pay across the two arms of the service which will bring stability and certainty for staff.
So our message to the CRC Chiefs and the Government is simply: pay up now!
Pay up and bring an end to the scandalous situation where CRC staff are now second best in the pay stakes, pay up now for CRC secondees working in NPS Divisions who are doing equal work of equal value alongside their NPS Colleagues. And If you are working in a CRC then help us to spread that message and increase the pressure on the employers.
Pay up and bring an end to the scandalous situation where CRC staff are now second best in the pay stakes, pay up now for CRC secondees working in NPS Divisions who are doing equal work of equal value alongside their NPS Colleagues. And If you are working in a CRC then help us to spread that message and increase the pressure on the employers.
On the back of all this, we think that there is now an incontrovertible case to reunify Probation.
Napo’s position is that we want to see Probation back in public ownership where it belongs. In Wales, work is being taken back from the failing CRC into the NPS, and we are obviously saying that if this good enough for Wales its good enough for England too!
In the Oral evidence that I gave to the Justice Select Committee in March, (who have issued a highly critical report demanding improvement to which such as TTG support and Minimum Contact Specification), I said that Napo are committed to working with all politicians to see a community focused, desistance driven probation model, set free from the still Prison-centric HMPPS.
Alongside this priority is the work that will need to be undertaken to build a Competency Based Framework which formed part of the NPS Pay settlement, to strengthen the Professional aspects of your work and thats why Napo, along with the Probation Institute, are campaigning for a Licence to Practice.
All these issues become even more important as consideration is being given to what happens to the CRC Contracts in 2020 and why we are saying that this Government must not repeat the same mistakes again by remarketing the Probation Service.
All these issues become even more important as consideration is being given to what happens to the CRC Contracts in 2020 and why we are saying that this Government must not repeat the same mistakes again by remarketing the Probation Service.
Look, let me be clear, Napo has always been opposed to the privatisation of public services, but I have gone on record before and will again, in saying that not all of the post-TR difficulties are the fault of the CRC owners.
It was not their fault that the CRC contracts were insufficiently structured and resourced from the outset, or the door being shut meaningful engagement with third sector providers and they're not to blame for a flawed PbR model.
Of course there are a few things some of them and this government are to blame for; but today my message is one of encouraging everyone with an interest to see how we can work with NPS and CRC Employers to ensure that where service improvements are needed we can try and work together. But that commitment must be matched by CRC owners to engage positively with the trade unions, especially on the issue of pay equity, and by them recognising the imperative to deliver safe operational models, and understand that people must come before profit, and why their hard working staff must be treated with dignity and respect.
So what might that future model for Probation look like?
I mentioned the objective of freeing Probation from HMPPS control earlier on, but in Napo’s view we need to campaign for a publicly owned model that embraces the concept of Community Justice.
One that builds on the key principle that its governance structures must be founded and delivered by people who understand the diverse needs of their communities: probation practitioners obviously, and the trade unions and professional bodies but also stakeholders such as the NHS, especially in the fields of mental heath drug and substance abuse, the Judiciary, Regional and Metro Mayors, PCC’s, local councillors, diversity representatives and those organisations in the third sector who are desperate to make a meaningful contribution to help reduce reoffending, but are currently denied the resources to do so.
One that builds on the key principle that its governance structures must be founded and delivered by people who understand the diverse needs of their communities: probation practitioners obviously, and the trade unions and professional bodies but also stakeholders such as the NHS, especially in the fields of mental heath drug and substance abuse, the Judiciary, Regional and Metro Mayors, PCC’s, local councillors, diversity representatives and those organisations in the third sector who are desperate to make a meaningful contribution to help reduce reoffending, but are currently denied the resources to do so.
Localism was the bedrock of the Probation Service before it became fragmented, and it should be the cornerstone of a new future which encompasses the proud traditions of your profession, one which engenders trust from our communities and does right by the clients it seeks to assist and redirect into making a meaningful contribution to society.
Its a big ask, but If you are on board with that campaign, I wish you all the best in playing a part achieving that transition.
Thirdly and finally: What is Napo and why be a member?
We are, as the title illustrates, a trade union and professional association for Probation and Cafcass staff.
Membership of Napo brings with it access to the Probation Journal and our recently relaunched and highly commended Napo Magazine and regular personalised weekly mail outs and my own Blog postings which seek to give you clarity on the issues that matter to you. These illustrate how Napo is doing its best to help you with issues relating to your employment and professional development. You will also have access to legal support depending on the circumstances and through our Napo Extra membership services you can also access a range of lifestyle discounts and financial advice.
Membership of Napo brings with it access to the Probation Journal and our recently relaunched and highly commended Napo Magazine and regular personalised weekly mail outs and my own Blog postings which seek to give you clarity on the issues that matter to you. These illustrate how Napo is doing its best to help you with issues relating to your employment and professional development. You will also have access to legal support depending on the circumstances and through our Napo Extra membership services you can also access a range of lifestyle discounts and financial advice.
More information and application forms are easily accessible on the Napo website but I am also grateful to the Institute for their help in making our material available alongside theirs and I urge you to consider joining both our organisations!
Finally, thank you all for your attention and I am sure that you will enjoy the remainder of today’s activities.
Ian Lawrence
" I am also signing off a personalised letters to every CRC Chief Executive within the next few days which will seek their support in lobbying the MoJ for more cash."
ReplyDelete"... look at the reply just in from David Gauke to my earlier letter which trots out the same insulting response that we hear from any number of people that the CRC employers are separate entities for pay purposes, despite them having received an additional half a billion pounds in taxpayers funding to shore up their failures"
Which is it to be? Support the CRCs in pocketing even more public money or castigate them for having swallowed up an extra £500m?
Its not an insult to state the fact that the CRCs are 21 separate entities. That's exactly how & why Grayling etc chose that format. TR was a calculated act to split the service, disenfranchise a left-leaning organisation & control staff costs.
For those still wondering how they ended up in a CRC, here's a reminder:
DeleteNew evidence has emerged that Chris Grayling misled the Commons when he denied that a lottery system had been used to move probation staff to private firms.... prisons minister Andrew Selous has now admitted the allegations were true and that staff were moved from the probation service into private firms by random lottery.
In a parliamentary answer to shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan, Selous said allocations were done via an “automatic assignment process” and failing that a “local evidence-based assignment criteria”.
But he then admitted that the allocations had been done by lottery where other methods had not worked.
“In those few situations where neither process led to allocation, and only in the case of administrative support staff, then the guidance allowed for agreement on transfer to be reached on the basis of a random assignment process,” he wrote.
“This was designed to ensure that staff in similar circumstances had an equal opportunity to be assigned to either of the new organisations.”
Despite insisting that the method had only been used in a “few situations”, Selous was unable to provide information about how many probation trusts had been forced to use the method.
“We do not hold figures relating to the number of trusts which made use of a random assignment method or how many staff were affected,” he said.
And that's how you've ended up not being paid at parity with Grayling's elite NPS crew. Either someone at Trust HQ had it in for you (“local evidence-based assignment criteria”) or your name came out of the hat.
Many of the issues are captured in this speech yet knowing of them but not having the intellect to understand how to combat them does not look good for Napo. In reading of the current chairs latest make a difference article or at least thinks so? Moving to a computer base member engagement spells the end for NAPO. What a duo it will only be a Labour government that can save probation but nothing from Napo.
DeleteI doubt Interserve who hold the most CRCs will be digging deep into their already depleted coiffeurs to give staff the increase we've actually worked bloody hard for not too mention the incremental payments they've missed !!
ReplyDeleteLess pay work less then obvious.
Deletecoiffeur
ReplyDelete/kwɑːˈfəː,kwɒˈfəː/
noun
plural noun: coiffeurs
a hairdresser.
Oops sorry hahaha it's early I'm tired
DeleteCaused a big smile here!
Deletehttps://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-6484741/Short-sellers-make-68m-betting-against-ailing-Interserve-share-price-plunged.html
ReplyDeleteThis is how capitalism works for the priveleged few, just like farage, Rees-Mogg, Johnson & others have profited handsomely from the Brexit shambles:
"Speculators have made an estimated £68million betting against Interserve so far this year.
Hedge funds and other short-sellers likely made almost £2million alone on Monday when the struggling government contractor's share price plunged 53 per cent after it announced plans for its second bailout in nine months, calculations from IHS Markit reveal.
The rout has sparked fears that the company, which works in schools, the NHS, prisons and other state sectors, could become 'Carillion mark two' and collapse like its larger rival.
That would be a major headache for ministers as Interserve operates state contracts worth £1.2billion, according to data company Tussell.
Unions have urged the Government to offer assurances to Interserve workers as the firm struggles under its near-£650million debt pile.
GMB National Officer Kevin Brandstatter said: 'Interserve senior managers have not taken interest in what is actually happening on the ground with projects and ignored all the warning signs which led to Carillion's collapse.
'There have been too many bids, too much underbidding, too many cuts to already cash-starved services, and too much business expansion backed up by burgeoning debt.'
US-listed asset manager Brightsphere, New York hedge fund FVP Master Fund, privately owned bank Lombard Odier Asset Management and investment manager Oxford Asset Management have all taken out short positions against Interserve in recent months, Financial Conduct Authority data shows.
They had a combined short position of around 5.6 per cent before Interserve shares nosedived this week. Shorting a stock is a strategy used by people who believe a company's share price will fall.
They place a bet against the company by borrowing shares from an existing investor, selling them, and then buying them back at a later date to return to the investor.
If the share price has fallen, the short-seller buys the stock back for less than they sold it for, and pockets the difference."
http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/27361
ReplyDeleteInterserve in discussion with pension regulator.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-6489083/Interserve-crunch-talks-pensions-regulator-retirement-scheme.html
Ever think you're just pissing in the wind?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-46547374
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-46547374
Better communication between support agencies "could possibly have prevented the murder of a vulnerable adult", a report has found.
DeleteAdrian Munday, 51, was manipulated and then killed by violent criminal Stuart Hodgkin in October 2015. A safeguarding report found fault with a number of organisations including health, probation and rehabilitation services. Mr Munday's twin sister said agencies had to learn from their mistakes.
The Devon Safeguarding Adults Board report found agencies had focused too much on Adrian Munday's drug problems, which increased his "vulnerability to exploitation".
The report highlights inconsistency in the joint work between Devon Partnership Trust and the Community Care Trust. It also identifies key failures on the part of the National Probation Service and the Devon, Dorset and Cornwall Community Rehabilitation Company who were responsible for monitoring and supervising Hodgkin.
Responding to the report, Mr Munday's sister Sarah Compton said: "You can't imagine what it's like to have a family member murdered until it happens to you. I think it's absolutely essential, and this is a plea from my heart to the agencies, [that they] learn from this review."
In the weeks before the killing Stuart Hodgkin had manipulated Mr Munday after meeting him on a train. He took over his home in Newton Abbot, Devon, robbing him of his money and possessions. The known criminal and drug user moved in with Mr Munday, making him sleep on the floor and demanding money from his family.
Mr Munday's body was found burned on 6 October 2015. He had injuries all over his body including 20 rib fractures, broken toes and significant head and brain injuries. Hodgkin was jailed for life for murder and died of cancer last April.
To what extent has the CRC failed . Working links are described as negligent by many. Will there be accountable measures made.
DeleteInterserve in deep trouble writing a living will in case or more to the truth when they go bust, but the email we received from them last week didn't spell out the real trouble they are in more blah blah blah your jobs will be safe. Hopefully the will would state that the CRC's should be returned to public ownership.
ReplyDeleteThey may well be but as usual the unions have said nothing asked for not one reassurance nor made any reference to the legal status of staff. Given the Napo finances it is a big question on whether they can survive in the short terms too from what is going around.
Deletehttps://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/15/interserve-goes-to-intensive-care
ReplyDelete