Friday 27 October 2023

Traumatised Supervise the Traumatised

It's been quite a week for some really shocking testimony to emerge as to what a horrid and toxic environment has developed within the probation workplace under HMPPS. This pretty much sums things up I think:- 
"HMPPS strategy is to double down on staff and say nothing. No words of support or encouragement to staff. No public statements in support of frontline staff. No sense that they even give lip service to any care and protection. It's putting the public and the staff at increasing risk. The traumatised being supervised by the traumatised. In their own frightened way, they probably think this is working: the coverage is fleeting and probation frontline are too knackered to raise their eyes from the performance keyboard and too frightened to say anything out loud. They have seen the news coverage (that's the only place I have seen any discussion, nothing in the canteen, nothing from managers) they just can't deal with it. It's all flight, freeze and fawn. Not sure there's much fight in anyone."

Meanwhile this Guardian article serves as a powerful reminder of the risks involved and how dysfunctional HMPPS has become:-  

Probation officers fear repeat of failings in murder case as pressures mount

Moves to free up prison places in England and Wales have prompted panic in already overstretched probation service


Giving evidence at an inquest last week, England’s most senior probation officer admitted that inexperienced and unqualified staff had made a “fundamental error” by classing Damien Bendall as posing a “low risk of harm to partners and to children”.

When Bendall, who had a history of domestic violence, murdered his pregnant girlfriend and three children in September 2021, he was on probation after receiving a 24-month suspended sentence for arson. He is now serving a whole-life sentence for the murders.

Every probation officer worries that among their towering caseload will be the next Bendall, said Tania Bassett, a national official for Napo, the trade union for probation workers.

“We have to do our best to make sure that that doesn’t happen again. But in the current climate, I can’t see that it won’t,” she said. “When you put anybody under that level of continual stress and strain and pressure, mistakes will happen.”

The pressures on probation are only going to mount after a twin set of announcements made by the justice secretary, Alex Chalk, on Monday last week.

First, he announced immediate emergency measures to release some prisoners up to 18 days early. About 100 have been released under that mechanism since, the Guardian understands.

More radically, Chalk said the government would “legislate for a presumption that custodial sentences of less than 12 months in prison will be suspended”. Instead of being sent to jail, most low-level offenders “will be punished in the community instead, repaying their debt within communities, cleaning up our neighbourhoods and scrubbing graffiti off walls,” he said.

Chalk said 55% of those given such short sentences reoffended within a year of release, so prison clearly wasn’t working.

It was a big departure for a government that likes to appear tough on crime. In August it was reported that ministers planned to introduce mandatory jail sentences for repeat shoplifters. In May, new sentencing guidelines raised the maximum sentence for animal cruelty from six months to five years. Since 2015, any adult caught twice with a knife must receive at least six months in jail.

Harsher sentences have been a hallmark of successive Conservative governments over the past 13 years, with the inevitable result that between 2012 and 2021 the average jail term increased from 17 to 24.9 months. Meanwhile, the number of community sentences has dropped by nearly two-thirds, from 189,333 in 2010 to 68,994 in 2022.

This month the prison population reached an all-time high of 88,225, with two-thirds of jails in England and Wales officially overcrowded. At least 15,000 prisoners are on remand, awaiting trial, owing to court backlogs caused by the Covid pandemic plus the fact that the Tories have closed half of all magistrates courts since 2010.

Chalk’s announcements prompted panic in the already overstretched probation service, which last year was managing 240,431 cases in prison and in the community.

Last month the departing chief inspector of probation, Justin Russell, reported “chronic staffing shortages at every grade which have led to what staff perceive to be unmanageable workloads” and said he was particularly worried about “consistently weak” public protection.

At the inquest for Bendall’s victims, the chief probation officer, Kim Thornden-Edwards, said the probation service had invested significantly in staff since the murders. Chalk told MPs that the government was already injecting £155m a year to recruit probation staff to bring down caseloads and deliver better supervision of offenders in the community. But in March this year there were actually 76 fewer probation officers than a year previously (4,413, compared with 4,489), though there were 846 more lower-qualified probation service officers, nearly 200 more senior probation officers and almost 500 more trainees.

There are particular shortages in London and the south, where housing costs are greatest. In Dorset, half of all qualified probation posts were unfilled this summer, resulting in difficulties in delivering unpaid work.

“People are being promoted to a senior probation officer six to nine months after they qualify,” Bassett said. “They are delivering training on things like parole, having never written a parole report in their life.”

Inside many prisons there are not enough probation staff working in offender management units (OMUs), which are supposed to prepare prisoners for release. At HMP Lowdham Grange in Nottinghamshire, probation officers manage 100 prisoners each, a recent inspection found, and prisoners were frustrated that “they were not receiving the help they needed to achieve their sentence plan targets”.

When inspectors put Woodhill high-security prison in Milton Keynes into special measures in September, the OMU had only half of the probation-trained managers it needed.

Sickness levels are high because of stress, said Bassett. “We had a workload meeting with members a few weeks ago and there was a member there who went off sick when her work dropped to 200%, down from 320%. She finally said: ‘I can’t do this any more,’” she said.

Chalk’s reforms will also affect the judiciary, particularly magistrates, who impose more short sentences than crown court judges. The principle is good, said Mark Beattie, the chair of the Magistrates Association. “Magistrates don’t take any pleasure in sending people to custody,” he said. But he queried what the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) was doing to increase unpaid work placements and other programmes to tackle problems such as drug and alcohol abuse imposed as part of community sentences.

“What frustrates us probably most is: it takes a long time for people to get on to that unpaid work pattern,” said Beattie, a magistrate in London. “We know it’s a challenge for probation to find enough projects. Unpaid work has to be done [for] 12 months and we see probation coming back to court and asking us to extend community orders.”

Less than half of all unpaid work orders are completed within 12 months in most regions of England, according to MoJ figures, with timely completions at under 40% in Greater Manchester and Yorkshire.

The availability and quality of treatment programmes imposed as part of many community sentences is also patchy, said Beattie, with a “postcode lottery” of which schemes are available in each area. For example, men convicted of domestic violence offences are often ordered to complete a course called Building Better Relationships, which has long waiting lists – 29% start the course more than six months after their referral date.

Though Napo has advocated for years for an end to short sentences for non-public order offences, Bassett does not believe Chalk’s announcement was rooted in ideology.

“I think they’ve just got to the point where they’ve got to be seen to do something because otherwise judges can’t sentence people,” she said. “I genuinely don’t think there’s a belief behind it, it’s not them thinking ‘we need to do some reform’. It’s their hand is being forced, it’s a sticking plaster over this gaping wound.”

19 comments:

  1. This is a further example as to the way probation is treated by those who make policy, just leave them to get on with it but until we are out of the clutches of the Civil Service, scrap PSS and stop recalling people on the basis that they ‘were not of good behaviour’, things are not likely to change. Create the Senior Practitioner role to free up SPO time and have a 3 year post qualification period before you can apply for an SPO role……rocket science it ain’t ….but fixable it is and it’s strange that for an organisation that continually exhorts us to be smarter we can’t be smarter about allocations, specialisms and a good dose of common sense…..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No I disagree. Everything needs to stop blaming PSS and recalls. PSS would not be impacting if there were enough staff to supervise the cases. I don’t think there is a need for a Senior Practitioner role either. We have QDOs, they are useless. We have SPOs and PTAs for trainees. The problem is lack of staff and poor pay which means it’s hard to recruit and retain staff.

      I also keep hearing this rhetoric about inexperienced SPOs but from what I see it’s the the longer the service the bigger incompetent bullies they are.

      Delete
    2. I think it’s more evidential rather than rhetorical

      Delete
    3. Anon 0823 I personally think Anon 0519 is right about senior pracs and having a period of post qualification before you can become either and SPO or a senior prac - as for QDOs being rubbish,, maybe it depends what area you are in and how pressured/ stretched they are too? Personally in my area (NE) I haven't had issue with support/ advice when needed . I do agree lack of staff and poor pay are at the heart of the issue though

      Delete
    4. QDOs and Senior Practitioners, why exactly? To tell other practitioners who are too busy how to do their jobs?

      Or do you mean pay Probation Officers at a higher rate because of experience and willingness to teach less experienced practitioners? Isn’t that what Practice Tutor Assessors and Senior Probation Officers are for?

      Or maybe Senior Probation Officers are too inexperienced or too busy to train inexperienced practitioners? Who is training the SPOs, surely not the incompetent Deputy and Heads of PDUs? Keep PSS, get rid of them!

      Delete
  2. Tania it’s not “mistakes will happen”. There’s not enough suitably trained staff to do the job in the first place. The workloads are too high to provide effective support. Say it for what it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought that comment should be addressed and you have thanks. It illustrates ms basset lacks experience of both being a short career ex po and a naive and uninformed union worker.

      Delete
    2. Err she’s not wrong tho. Mistakes will happen in a fully staffed service

      Delete
    3. When you work in unsafe environments and things go wrong that’s not a mistake. It’s a consequence of the hazards of the unsafe environment. Calling it a mistake suggests the worker is at fault.

      Delete
  3. PSS added about 150,000 cases to the probation caseload overnight when TR was enacted. It was a contrived gesture to the finances of the CRCs, a means of enticing bids & greasing the palms of privateers. It was yet another failed social engineering experiment which cost the taxpayer £many-millions, which cost probation many jobs & in a lot of cases cost those made subject to PSS their liberty.

    Scrap PSS & you take a huge burden off the reconstituted hmpps probation service which has haemorrhaged staff & skills since 2014.

    In & of itself it doesn't compensate for the poor staffing levels, the pisspoor fast-track 'training', the bullying managers, the abusive culture or the utter incompetents who hide in plain sight in every PDU - but its a start.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Managers bully it's the only tool of the idiot and that has been probations direction for many years. I guess one of the DDS will offer soothing recipe of beer fags and a soufflé. The reason we have these walk overs is they shafted our terms and conditions because Napo gave them up and today we have no policies for professional staff. Just sscl and their prison regimented abuse. To drive staff out they don't want retention.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know my situation is dire, I really do my best with increasing demands made on me sustained over time so my resilience is just slipping away. Reading some of the posts here, it really truly is everywhere but I can’t stop thinking of the West Midlands PDU head referred to yesterday who has put 90% of staff on work improvement when most are on 160% workload. How is that allowed to happen, why is there not an immediate visit happening by the Inspectors? Something is clearly very very wrong there and it doesn’t sound to be the staff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plerase understand that the inspectors aren't allowed to leave their offices in Manchester (or wherever they are these days) until they've given 12 weeks' notice that they're on their way & provided detailed lists of all cases &/or issues to be addressed so that the useless fuckers in whichever pdu can try to score more than 20% in their HMIP test.

      Delete
    2. And yet 19:11 even with all that prep time and notice might I enquire how all the PDUs rate?

      Delete
  6. I see time and time again people being traumatised by the work we do. All that is given when you dare mention this is a signpost to PAM assist who have no clue what we do! It’s becoming a running joke that everyone needs 6 months off a year to stay sane in this job. I only fear it will get worse with the ever increasing workloads and a culture of punitive measures against staff who largely work exceptionally hard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's nationally understood the unions wont take employment tribunals forward costs and so the members lose allways. We need a real union or change the players .

      Delete
  7. Given that, I assume, most probation practitioners, are grounded in a humanitarian footing, I assume that they, like me, are appalled at events in Gaza. It is difficult enough to go to work under what is becoming an increasingly them and us principle . That principle is reflected in the Israel Palestinian debate. A notion of subjugation , distortion of facts, abuse of power etc appears to be an increasingly norm in politics at a macro and major level. I was part of Northumberland NAPO when we had a proud history of internationalism/ solidarity. It seems to me that nowadays many of probation great leaders are like politicians who sway with the wind - devoid of principles. On a broader call out, for the sake of legacy, can we list HoAs who are driving this culture of what can only be described as bullying. HoA Teesside comes to mind immediately from comments from Colleagues and regional meetings- a very macho guy who insists on being called Doctor. An ex military alpha male by all accounts.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ah 20:39 do you refer to he who left staff mystified by playing a Churchill speech to them to motivate them, and called an all staff meeting to bollock his staff when the Inspector called and didn’t rate him, sorry the PDU as good? I heard that meeting was cancelled at v short notice though when his even more excellent leader caught wind of it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. meanwhile same area, keep the staff quiet given them a £20 voucher as a reward for recognition of going the extra mile, that will keep them in their place....

    ReplyDelete