Saturday 7 October 2023

Look At The Alternative

Ok, yesterday I said I'd refrain from commenting on the extraordinary goings-on at the Conservative party conference, but since then I've had the opportunity of watching on catch-up all three episodes of Laura Kuenssberg's 'State of Chaos' and Ch4's 'Partygate'. We lived through all this, but it's only when you re-live it in concentrated form that it smacks you in the face just what an utter shower of shit the Tory Party had become under serial liar and self-obsessed incompetent Boris Johnson and the really horrid corrosive effect it's had on our democratic structures and institutions. 

The outfit is rotten to the core and Rishi Sunak continued to take the piss out of us all with that speech the other day, making stuff up, stoking up hate, inciting culture wars and promising the world with a fake alternative transport plan written by 12yr olds. The Guardian neatly demolishes it:-   

Ten problems with Rishi Sunak’s Network North announcement

Prospectus repeats old promises, ditches others and demonstrates an elastic definition of ‘the north’

Life moves fast when you’re Rishi Sunak. On Tuesday, he insisted he was not going to be bounced into making a quick decision on HS2. Within 24 hours he was standing up at Conservative party conference heralding a new transport network.

Not only did he scrap HS2 north of Birmingham, dismissing it as “the ultimate example of the old consensus”, but he had somehow found time to sign off a 40-page prospectus for Network North. Subtitle: Transforming British Transport.

Though no one could possibly believe the document was actually drawn up during a conference all-nighter, it did bear all the hallmarks of something rustled up in a hurry. And some of the things Sunak has said since have illustrated a significant lack of understanding of the realities of transport in the north of England and/or a forgetfulness around what he or his predecessors had already announced.

Here are 10 dodgy bits in and around the Network North announcement:

1 – The front-page map of the prospectus seems to relocate Manchester to Preston.

2 – It says new funding to Greater Manchester could mean the Metrolink tram network being extended to Manchester airport. The airport link opened in 2014.

3 – Labour analysis of Sunak’s promises found 85% had already been promised or committed to during the Conservatives’ 13-year reign.

4 – In a promotional video to promote Network North, Sunak said he would quadruple the number of trains between Sheffield and Leeds. As the travel journalist Simon Calder pointed out, there are already five an hour each way, and so Sunak appeared to be promising 20 trains an hour – one every three minutes – which would essentially turn the route into a tube line. Great news for God’s own county! Alas, it seems the prime minister failed to read the small print of Network North, which promised to increase the number of fast trains between these two Yorkshire cities to three or four an hour.

5 – After Sunak’s speech on Wednesday, the government issued a list of projects to which it was committed. One of these read: “The Leamside line, closed in 1964, will also be reopened.” Come Thursday morning, the promise to reinstate the 21-mile route in County Durham had mysteriously disappeared from the Network North prospectus. The transport minister Richard Holden told the local democracy reporting service the government was now only “committed to looking into it”.

6 – Sunak has a very elastic definition of the “north”, with Network North promising to improve rail connections to Plymouth, which is 250 miles from Crewe – the Cheshire town that many people see as the gateway to the north of England.

7 – Speaking of Crewe, it went from being a key hub on HS2 to being probably the biggest loser of the cancellation debacle. This once great railway town is mentioned only in passing in Network North, when there is talk of £1bn investment in the north Wales main line, which starts in Crewe.

8 – There is little in Network North about creating new capacity on the chockablock west coast main line north of Birmingham, particularly the Castlefield corridor into Manchester, which is classed by Network Rail as “officially congested”. According to Craig Browne, the deputy leader of Cheshire East council, “the rail journey from Crewe to Manchester on the west coast main line is mostly two tracks [one in each direction], which means you can only go at the speed of the slowest train.” HS2 was supposed to take the fastest intercity services off the main line, freeing up space for far more local stopping services.

9 – Bristol – which is north of Devon and Cornwall and not a lot else in England – also had its opportunities snatched away with a quick swipe of the delete key. On Wednesday, government documents promised “£100m for a mass transit system for Bristol to revolutionise travel in and around Bristol”. On Thursday, that pledge had vanished. It appeared to have been replaced with a broader pledge to give the West of England combined authority £100m, which it could spend on various things in their region.

10 – Network North committed to upgrading the A259 from Bognor Regis to that well-known northern city of Southampton, but on Thursday ministers admitted they actually meant Littlehampton, 45 miles away.

--oo00oo--

We're now clearly in full election mode and yesterday's Scottish by-election result for Labour gives an indication that thankfully we could be in for a significant change of direction. Ok Labour might just turn out to be 'blue Labour', but it surely can't be as bad as what we've been enduring, can it? When people jibe at Joe Biden for his age and lack of dynamism, he reminds everyone of the alternative. Indeed.   

63 comments:

  1. Please remember the best way to convey our contempt for the management of the service is NOT to complete the peoples survey. They care more about overall engagement. They will not read your beautifully expressed concerns about workload

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's a lot of speculation about when Sunak actually made the decision to scrap HS2.
    Unbelievably, they were still splurging money on compulsory purchases as the Tory Conference took place.
    Maybe Sunak could have made some attempt to apologise to all those people who have lost their homes or businesses through compulsory purchases to make way for HS2.
    It's reported that its likely to still cost the tax payer around £700m to settle the legal commitments of compulsory purchases made to facilitate HS2.
    I wish I had the ability to calculate just how much money this government has wasted throughout the last 13 years. Probation, Carillion etc, and even Johnsons bloody legal fees for his defence of partygate.

    https://inews.co.uk/news/government-bought-house-hs2-line-rishi-sunak-cancelled-2667199

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes that is true the more contribute the more opportunity for some serious spin to take place…..and it will….

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't give a s*it about their pathetic conference. We just need to get rid of the whole sorry lot of them. Stop whingeing about Starmer and vote Labour at next election because if Tories get in again we are all *ucked!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No we will be well and truly *ucked with Starmers lot trying to out do the tories, a hung parliament is what is needed keep both sides out of overall power

      Delete
  5. https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/06/chris-grayling-joins-list-of-tories-standing-down-at-next-election?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16966789713499&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fpolitics%2F2023%2Foct%2F06%2Fchris-grayling-joins-list-of-tories-standing-down-at-next-election

    ReplyDelete
  6. 11:20, I could never bring myself to vote for the tories Brit the blue ones or the red one. I won’t be voting for Starmer.
    Like Blair, and Kinnock before him he is expelling members who want change and courting big business so we can have more of the same.
    I will probably lodge a protest vote with the greens or the Communist party if they are standing in my constituency.
    Starmer and his acolytes are doing exactly what the accused Militant Tendency of in the past, entering the Labour Party under a false flag and taking over by stealth.
    They are probably on the verge of a huge majority and should be using this to effect change in favour of working people but they are cosying up to big business and polishing up their media images to hide the fact that they have no policies and no principles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this Tory central office.

      Delete
    2. I agree @11:07

      Delete
    3. You're effectively voting Tory - good work

      Delete
  7. @13:01- the Right wing of Labour PLP were quite happy for tories to remain in power at the last GE when they threw it as didn’t want Corbyn as PM - We are not voting Labour due to what Starmer has and is doing and how he’s reneged on everything & Pretty much got rid of all the socialists

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 14:54 - Ok, so may we enquire which party would you vote for? We don't have PR of course.

      Delete
    2. I'm very uncomfortable voting labour at the next GE.
      I've always voted labour, but I dont like Starmer, nor do I like the shift of direction the party has taken.
      However, I worry that if I vote anything else I'm diminishing the possibility of getting rid of this utterly rotten government.
      So even with my reservations with the current Labour party, I'll give them my vote for the greater good.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    3. I think you've very neatly summed-up the dilemma many face with first-past-the-post. Vote whilst holding nose in order to get rid of Tories.

      Delete
    4. I haven’t decided who I’ll vote for yet. In the local elections I vote for TUSC

      Delete
  8. Angels and ministers of grace save us from Starmer !

    ReplyDelete
  9. I've had to delete extremely rude invective from a contributor, and I understand how socialists and Jeremy Corbyn supporters must feel, but is the argument seriously that another Tory government is preferable to a 'blue' Labour one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim you should be deleting that vile which triggers such a response mate.

      Delete
    2. It's a difficult judgement to make - sadly the quality of contributions has declined markedly over recent years - I delete loads of inflammatory rubbish believe me.

      Delete
    3. Fair enough your best judgement but you will have known how unfair that starmer attack is. I hope he gets in well . He is playing a blue coat then to reveal his red stripes. Any more Tories and the Victorians will look liberal. Despite that they built rail sewage and industry while killing the people. If that's what this country wants.

      Delete
    4. Bonkers. I know some Corbynites who say they will refuse to vote for Starmer's labour. Bonkers. Will only empower the worst people - the Tories

      Delete
  10. The ‘debate,’ is a bit like that going on for the soul of the probation service. There is no discussion, just the belief that ‘might is right,’
    The rank and file of the probation service appear to want to go in one direction whilst the glorious leaders are pushing and pulling in another. So it is too with the Labour Party and those who would form a government. They have a vision which does not meet the aspirations of their electorate.
    I saw in the papers yesterday that Angela Rayner is calling for unity. Why is this always on the terms dictated by the right wingers. There was no unity when the likes of Stephen Kinnock and others betrayed Corbyn and was subsequently rewarded by Starmer.
    The Tory’s have spent decades looking after themselves and their supporters, it’s not too much to ask that a party which purports to support workers puts its money where its mouth is.
    If you/we vote for the red tories without protest, they will tell you they have a mandate when effectively there is no choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok understand that, but surely a public argument now with an election only months away is only going to be good for the Tories.

      Delete
    2. I agree with annon @10:02, and they make a good analogy with the "fight for the soul of the probation service".
      However, I think the Labour party like probation have traveled far too far down a destructive road to simply u-turn and make it back in one single trip. It has to be a stage by stage process now, and unless 'blue' labour are elected as the governing party, then in opposition they will continue down the same road. The left of the party will have no real voice until the leadership needs their voice to pass their legislation.
      I feel the same betrayal as 10:02, but the first stage of the 'road home' must be to oust our incumbent government.
      I'm extremely unhappy with the current Labour party and I'd like to vote for someone else in protest. But I'm frightened of what a protest vote by me and many many others that feel the same way might deliver in the election.
      In truth I feel a hostage to our political system, but I'll "hold my nose" and vote Labour as the first step towards recovery.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    3. Our electoral system is surely one of our major problems and Labour must be encouraged to sort that if they get into power. But in the meantime I'm with 'Getafix - vote Labour and hold one's nose. There's no other way - unless a tactical vote is called for of course eg Lib Dem is more likely to unseat the Tory.

      Delete
    4. Agree 10:02

      Delete
  11. "State of Chaos"

    Off topic but worth noting. The Telegraph is reporting that prisons may run out of places by the end of this week!
    Emails with instructions not instigate recall?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/08/prisons-full-bust-governor-head-warns-run-out-spaces/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www-kentonline-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.kentonline.co.uk/sheerness/news/amp/emergency-declared-as-kent-prison-reaches-capacity-294824/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16968880017320&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentonline.co.uk%2Fsheerness%2Fnews%2Femergency-declared-as-kent-prison-reaches-capacity-294824%2F

      Delete
    2. An emergency scheme allowing the Ministry of Justice to take over police cells and use them to lock up offenders has been triggered in the county due to overcrowding.

      Canterbury Crown Court's most senior judge, Simon James, revealed this morning that HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey has “reached capacity” and Operation Safeguard has been put into place.

      The government contingency plan was created to deal with prison overcrowding.

      It involves the temporary use of police cells to provide the immediate additional capacity needed to ensure the smooth running of the prison system.

      Alerting barristers to the situation this morning, Judge James said: "As you may be aware, Operation Safeguard was implemented in Kent last week because HMP Elmley has reached capacity and that is causing problems all across the county.

      "I have been assured that those defendants housed there involved in trials, and therefore have to come out and go back, will be guaranteed a place at the prison and hopefully we are not going to find ourselves with defendants being sent to police stations. That will happen with other defendants remanded into custody."

      Delete
  12. From Church Times:-

    THE Bishop of Gloucester, the Rt Revd Rachel Treweek, has criticised government plans to send prisoners overseas as likely to hinder rehabilitation.

    In a speech to the Conservative Party Conference on Tuesday, the Justice Secretary, Alex Chalk, announced that the Government intended “to look at the Norwegian example and explore renting overseas capacity”, as a means of tackling overcrowding in prisons. He also said that the Government was “rolling out the largest prison-expansion programme since the Victorian era”.

    Bishop Treweek, the Church of England’s lead bishop for prisons, expressed dismay at plans to send prisoners overseas, and said that the “crisis in our prison system . . . was entirely avoidable.”

    She continued: “For too long we have seen increased sentence lengths combined with unacceptable numbers of people being held in prison on remand. Instead of investing in alternatives to prison for non-violent offences, the Government has pledged to create more prison places, and we now know these will not come soon enough.

    “Placing prisoners overseas will have a serious impact on their contact with family, their rehabilitation and resettlement. I believe our humanity and flourishing is rooted in relationship, and we cannot offshore our rehabilitation responsibilities.”

    In an article for the Church Times website to mark Prisons Week, which begins on Sunday, Bishop Treweek, considers further the problem of prison overcrowding. She writes that the escape last month of Daniel Khalife from HM Prison Wandsworth (Comment, 15 September) resulted in “answers being demanded about how the prison could possibly have allowed this to happen”.

    She welcomes a debate about prison numbers and overcrowding, but warns against “simplistic answers about needing to build additional prisons and create more prison places and possibly even send prisoners to cells overseas.

    “It is not the capacity of our prisons which is too small, but, rather, our diminished ability to think long-term.”

    She writes that she rejects “the popular message that our streets and communities will be safer if we lock up more people and make sentences longer. That’s not just because, as a Christian, I believe in hope, redemption, and transformation — but also because the evidence and data don’t support the narrative.”

    The number of people sentenced to more than ten years in prison has more than doubled in a decade, she writes, and half of those who leave custody go on to reoffend within a year of their release.

    “So much more transformation and reduction in reoffending could take place for so many people within good community alternatives to prison, and by looking for the underlying issues of offending. This requires imagination and a commitment to investing the money differently.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the MoJ want to look at the Norwegian model they might be better advised to adopt the whole approach if they want to repair a broken system.

      https://www.firststepalliance.org/post/norway-prison-system-lessons#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20biggest%20factors,that%20makes%20life%20more%20difficult.

      'Getafix

      Delete
  13. I have complained here before in past times about BoJo and his divisive rhetoric against Muslim women and how some of them dress. Suella Braverman's comments about immigration, her family's akin to a gentle cooling breeze in the stifling heat of summer (I may have deviated here from what she actually said) compared to the hurricane we are about to be faced with was another example of divisive rhetoric. It is deliberate in my view and carefully crafted in order to deny such accusations but also designed to capture a certain type of voter of which I fear there are several million. Shameful dirty politics in my opinion!

    ReplyDelete
  14. P as Prison Governor

    ReplyDelete
  15. https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/09/probation-staff-handling-man-who-went-on-to-four-were-overwhelmed?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16968826341434&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fuk-news%2F2023%2Foct%2F09%2Fprobation-staff-handling-man-who-went-on-to-four-were-overwhelmed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probation workers involved with a man who went on to murder three children and his pregnant girlfriend have described being “overwhelmed” by their workload.

      An inquest opened on Monday into the deaths of Terri Harris, 35, and her children John Paul Bennett, 13, and Lacey Bennett, 11, and Lacey’s friend Connie Gent, 11.

      They were all murdered by Damien Bendall, 33, who is serving whole-life sentences after he admitted last year to killing them in a series of “brutal, vicious and cruel attacks”. He also pleaded guilty to raping Lacey.

      The victims’ bodies were discovered at the family home in Killamarsh, Derbyshire, on 19 September last year, where Bendall was staying at the time.

      A review of how probation staff supervised Bendall in January found that there were several failings. The chief inspector of probation, Justin Russell, said the assessment and supervision of Bendall was of an “unacceptable standard” at every stage and “critical opportunities” to correct errors were missed.

      Inquests into all four deaths began at Chesterfield coroner’s court on Monday and will explore how Bendall, who had a history of serious and violent offences dating back to 2004, was classed as posing a low risk of serious harm to partners and children.

      The inquest heard evidence from two probation officers who worked at Swindon probation office, near where Bendall lived before he moved in with Harris.

      They said their heavy workload left them feeling stressed.

      Matt Read, a probation officer who worked at the Swindon office between May 2016 and April 2017, said he moved to the branch to help because it had staffing and recruitment issues.

      Read told the inquest how an former partner of Bendall had made allegations of domestic abuse against him, but this could not be recorded in the offender assessment system because it is a document seen by the offender and thus could put the woman at risk. That meant the potential risk of domestic violence was not passed on to other probation officers who took on Bendall’s case.

      Another probation officer, Rebecca Thomas, said she was not aware that a former partner had made allegations of domestic abuse and therefore she assessed him as being at a medium risk of violence in relationships and a low risk to children.

      Thomas told the inquest she took over Bendall’s case from a probation officer who had gone on long-term sick leave. She said that at one point while working at the Swindon office she was working at 170% capacity.

      She said: “It felt overwhelming at times in Swindon. I had case loads in two offices. I was very stretched for roughly a month because I wanted to do a good handover for my colleagues.

      Delete
    2. “[During] my time in the Swindon office, the case loads were very high. It affected my stress levels.”

      When Thomas took over the management of Bendall’s case, he was in prison for assaulting a prison officer. She said he was assessed as a risk to prison staff because of the attack and a risk to the public because of an armed robbery he had previously carried out.

      Thomas told the inquest “in an ideal world” she would have had time to look over two years’ worth of assessments on Bendall, but she could not because of her workload.

      The inquest, expected to last two weeks, continues.

      Delete
    3. can't wait to hear the managers' evidence (assuming they've been asked to give evidence), although I think we all know where it will take us...

      Delete
    4. Excellent leadership.
      The rest is bollox.

      Delete
    5. I really hope the Chesterfield Coroner will familiarise herself/himself with the many many Probation Inspection reports which evidence very poor leadership, accusations of bullying, workload abuse and chronic lack of support for Probation Officers who are so often the scapegoats when things go wrong

      Delete
    6. s/he might have copies now...

      Delete
    7. Off topic sorry . I get these on my inbox news I think they are a clearer sign of the police clearing their swamp. Also on this guy he could just as easily been working in a probation setting where we see the harm. I appreciate we have a range of offending probation staff too a northern link should have gone for similar and these days they would have. Anyway interested to see what the job blog makes of this .

      Misconduct hearing for Detective Constable Christopher Gibbons
      Notice of an accelerated hearing to be held in public
      Name of the officers concerned: Detective Constable Christopher Gibbons

      Date: 12 October 2023

      Time: 9am

      Location: Misconduct Hearing Suite, Empress State Building, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR

      Details
      Detective Constable Christopher Gibbons based at Central West Basic Command Unit will answer allegations that his conduct amounts to a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of:

      Discreditable Conduct
      On 21 March 2023 DC Gibbons attended Westminster Magistrates Court to answer the following charge:

      1) Between 14 September 2022 and 25 September 2022 in Westminster, London, pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of the victim and which he knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of the victim contrary to section 2(1) and (2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

      DC Gibbons initially pleaded not guilty. However, following the conclusion of a trial on 13 July 2023 he was found guilty of Harassment contrary to section 2(1) and (2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

      On 10 August 2023, DC Gibbons was committed to prison for 10 weeks suspended for two years.

      He is now subject to a supervision period of 24 months, to participate in an accredited programme for 30 days and to comply with any instructions of the responsible officer to attend appointments (with the responsible officer or someone else nominated by them).

      DC Gibbons was ordered to pay compensation of £500 and costs to the CPS of £250.

      DC Gibbons is now also subject to a restraining order.

      The matters set out above, individually and/or collectively, if proven, are said to amount to gross misconduct, in that they are so serious as to justify dismissal.

      Delete
    8. Hell gross misconduct who the hell are they kidding. He went to jail. Is in probation and probably still being paid. He should have been dismissed before the court hearing ffs. His pension should be stripped away to despicable.

      Delete
  16. Having had yet another hideous day at work .. to come home and read this alongside comments on websites accusing the probation workforce of being lazy and incompetent yet no word from senior management / union or anyone else along the lines of “actually our staff work bloody hard and are at breaking point” is seriously making me consider quitting tomorrow morning

    ReplyDelete
  17. It really isn’t about “in an ideal world” stop using that language please it should be ‘ if managers allowed me to work at the approved level rather than over allocating work that is not possible for a PO to do’….

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://www.stroudnewsandjournal.co.uk/news/23846963.life-prison-officer-hmp-leyhill-near-wotton/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure he's a great chap and all that but they will pick and choose who they interview for maximum positive publicity. They are not going to choose the officers who speak put about dire working conditions and the dire conditions for inmates.

      Delete
  19. I am reminded of the Coroners Court hearing about the murder of Conner Marshall in 2015. The Coroner described the privatised Working Links CRC supervision and support of Probation and Probation Service Officers as "woefully inadequate" and also described Senior CRC Managers as being "evasive and unreliable" when they too testified in the Coroners Court This was during the CRC regime of deliberately encouraging Probation Officers not to breach Offenders. The brave Probation Service Officer in this case stood up to the gaslighting of Senior Managers and her account was believed by the Coroner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for her and glad she had the strength to speak up. We were poorly treated by CRC and no better in NPS or whatever it's called now. We are just sitting ducks waiting for the next SFO.

      Delete
  20. Just faced more vile abuse today in the office. Being called a 'tranny' for doing my job. How is it that some IOM Police are on 9 grand more that probation officer top pay scale yet we have at least, if not more responsibility?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I already realise this is an abusive term but what is its meaning. What rank is the police officer male I assume who would have said this and will you record and report this for appropriate written action.

      Delete
  21. In view of the current order to delay sentencing of convicted but bailed defendants. Is this not a good time to publicize the well known effectiveness of probation supervision in the community? I would also like to call upon courts to sentence convicted defendants who have completed their sentences on remand or curfew tag, as asking for a PSR in such circumstances is an exercise in structured futility. Probation management might also care to think about the futility of returning offenders to custody for 14 days for breach of PSS and could we be given a pass on recalling offenders for 28 days?

    ReplyDelete
  22. https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2023/10/11/probation-services-officer-only-in-role-months-before-being-given-bendall-case/

    ReplyDelete
  23. Goodness me this has been a bit of a catch up. For what it’s worth (not a lot really) as a socialist I won’t be voting for Labour in the next election. I have based my decision on the behaviour of the right wing of the party. Confected anti semitism and the traducing of decent members has left a very sour taste in my mouth. The final straw came when they tried to expel a Jewish member for being anti semitic. However, before people start reaching for their high horses may I point out that I live in an area that has voted Labour since time began, and because of our antiquated electoral system Labour will still be voted in at the next election. I just won’t feel as dirty by voting for The Greens. On other news am I right in thinking that custodial sentencing has been paused because the prison estate is in such a mess? I mean really….One of the themes to emerge from a career largely spent working with the more dangerous offenders is that our society is no more or less dangerous than its was when I started my career in 1987. Violent and sexual crimes have remained at a pretty steady level and murders remain largely the same each year since the 1970s. What has changed is the increased surveillance in our society and an obsession with safety and security. Which plays into the idea that prison is the only way we can be saved from the threats we face. So whilst serious crime has by and large remained at steady levels the use of prison has sky rocketed. Alas I do not see Labour changing this any time soon. The CJS does not need any more tough talking it needs to be free of ideology and be based solely on evidence. I notice Norway has been mentioned as a model of good practice. I second that but I’m afraid our political parties remain too scared or too vacuous to follow this path.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 14:41 Thanks for taking the trouble and for returning - hope to hear more from you.

      Delete
    2. For a party that tries to say its fighting anti-semiticism, Labour seems to of been throwing out left-wing Jewish members left and right. Nothing anti-semitic about thinking Jewish people should all think the same regarding Israel and Zionism.

      Delete
  24. I was on a training event the other day with probation. Staff , my god I have never met such a bunch of miserable , unsympathetic , condemning individuals in all my life , my god I know you are overworked and paid rubbish but lots of your colleagues are dreadful

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’ve read this several times, I want to say what nonsense but I think people have changed and I think the lack of agency we now have over our own work, the constant stress and unremitting pressure has led to this. It is nasty in our workplace and it feels like we are at the coal face chipping away and shovelling as hard as we can but everything just gets worse. I honestly think the only humanity and kindness I encounter is from PoPs ( “call them that / no don’t call them that, write it in full don’t abbreviate it’s disrespectful, we’ve changed our minds on this one”). I really wish the treatment of us by senior managers was exposed but we are not one, we are divided without any sense of collective identity and as soon as anyone speaks up, a colleague will say the opposite, even about someone’s direct experience. It is just nasty.
      PO 170% caseload, unable to sleep and trying to plan my forthcoming day.

      Delete
  25. Nothing 'blue' about Labour - they don't need to be like tories to be terrible. Labour has long been an anti-working class pro-imperialist party, and Sir Keirs the continuity candidate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Starmer/Labour can't tell you what a woman is. Let that sink in for bit.

      Delete
    2. Anon at 09:20 I thought long and hard about publishing this, but seeing as we are in full election mode and an awful lot of shite will engulf us, in anticipation I'd just like to say that in order to pass moderation, any contribution must be thoughtful, respectful and well-argued even if I disagree with it. This has been my policy from the start and the way in which I intend to continue. In response to the above, I found the following on the Labour website from a contributor:-

      "This is a plea to all who want rid of Tory rule not to allow the issue of Trans and Gender politics to scupper Labour's chances at the next election. Millions of people living below the breadline are crying out for labour to defeat the Tories. Please, please do not allow this issue to give the Tories and the right wing media the ammo to rubbish Labour. Most people believe that women do not have a penis and that women should not be forced to share changing rooms, toilets, safe houses, etc with people born with a penis. The same holds true for women's sport. Women should not be made to compete with men however they wish to identify. We have to find other ways to support Trans and Non Binary people that does not impinge on the hard won rights of people born with a vagina. We owe it to the working people of this country not to let this issue derail a Labour victory. Just because the Right has adopted an anti Trans agenda does not mean that the left should adopt an ideology that at it's extremes fly's in the face of rational debate and stoops to name calling, re-inventing the language and trying to paint everyone who opposes them with the same brush. There are better ways to support minorities than this divisive one size fits all culture war. Whichever side of the debate you favour, please do not make it one of the main issues of the next election. Choose which battles you can win so that the war will not be lost."

      Delete
    3. @Jim - Thats fair enough. In a nutshell, the person your quoting from seems to basically be saying, and this is echoed with a lot of Labour voters, right and left, that Labour need to be voted in to get the Tories out, and thats it - you'll often hear said people screeching "Tory Scum" and "Tories Out". Everyone knows the Tories are garbage, but its as if Labour rely on the bar being on the floor to ask for votes, rather than offering any real opposition. Here are some non-culture war (or 'woke vs anti-woke') points to consider;

      Starmer is anti-working class - Starmer was unsupportive about Labour mp's joining pickets when NHS and transport workers were striking, and didn't express any solidarity

      Starmer will privatise the NHS

      Starmer is pro-imperialism and will drag England into wars - he's not challenged Sunaks offer to provide military support for Israel

      The list could go on, but thats just a climpse. He is of course, the continuity candidate, not Jeremy Corbyn.






      Delete
    4. Not sure Corbyn speaking in London this week was a good idea other than to garner his Muslim vote base for mayor. The middle east issues will roll out in the UK and it will be costly as concentrated ethnic communities protest in favour of Gaza which threaten many London based Jewish communities. You cannot call this an integrated society now as many watch on to this hostile hatred amongst the competing cultures.

      Delete
    5. Anon 18:17 - why do you think JC speaking was bad, and what threat is posed against British Jewish community in relation to Gaza ?
      UK involvement in the Middle East is a disaster..

      Delete