Friday, 18 January 2019

NPS IT Failures



There have been extensive IT failures in NPS for over a week:-
No access to any IT since Friday. Staff being asked to work from home where possible and use their own wifi at home. No communication/apologies from anyone about this? What is Plan B?
Another IT meltdown. Now at Day 5. Just weeks after the last - this is shambles and frontline staff will still be blamed if targets missed.
Day 7 and 'fixes' yesterday now seem to have had no effect, no access to emails, Delius or OASYs this morning.
This from Napo today:-

Napo members are asked to help circulate this message urgently amongst colleagues and other staff

Many reports have reached us since the start of the year of catastrophic IT failures in the NPS with the worst incidents occurring over the last seven days. Many CRC members will be familiar with ongoing IT outages and our members in CAFCASS will remember the terrible consequences of an IT failure following the introduction of their paperless system.

At yesterday’s Trade Union Engagement Meeting, Napo made strong representations about the chaos with the employer. Fortunately they were able to confirm that there is no truth in the rumour of hacking or external attacks on the system, but that a major glitch has occurred as a result of a system upgrade affecting 45,000 users across the NPS and wider Civil Service. Whilst accepting the reassurances that everything possible is being done to rectify the fault (which is obviously taking a lot longer than anticipated with further problems being reported to us), we made it very clear that the failures are having a serious impact on staff in the NPS. We also understand that the problems have affected some CRC operations where members have advised us that important case data is not reaching end users.

Risk issues

As you would expect, we pointed out the serious risk issues in relation to no information being available about callers to offices, the inability to safely share information with other agencies and practitioners being unable to make informed risk assessments. We also pointed out the duty that all employers have under health and safety at work legislation to take action to mitigate these risks and for staff to protect themselves. We also highlighted the extreme pressure this will place on members already facing unacceptable workloads, where the failure of the basic tools can be the final straw.

We received assurances that messages will be coming to staff from the employer very soon to apologise for the situation and recognise the impact this is having on them. We have asked for pro-active measures to be taken to ensure that members are not held responsible for failing to meet targets during periods of IT failures. We have also secured an agreement that to support this, the central log of IT failures will be made available to line managers around the time that they will be expected to have meetings with staff for the SPDR process. 



We have also been assured that all business continuity planning will be reviewed to put into place contingency processes to protect staff and the public. Finally, we have been assured that there will be a high level discussion with the Director of Probation about how to manage the inevitable backlog of work and we expect more news soon about when this will take place.

Napo Advice in the event of IT failures

Meanwhile, we wanted to offer members some general advice on coping with IT failures, whatever your employer.

  • Keep a log of the issues to use if required to explain failures to meet targets at a later date
  • In the event of a total lack of access to client information union reps should hold an emergency health and safety meeting to ask local managers what steps are being taken to ensure the safety of staff, clients and the public
  • If you have a laptop and work at home or at another location to catch up with essential tasks, record all time spent working appropriately on your timesheet, even if out of usual working hours
  • If you work from an alternative location make sure that you protect your own health and safety. This includes making sure that you have an appropriate workspace, for some members it may not be possible to work from an alternative location due to their specific needs or specialist equipment. You will also need to ensure you can maintain data security and follow employer policies on this. If in doubt you should report to your line manager that you are unable to complete work and unable to follow the suggestion to work from home / an alternative location because of these concerns.
  • If you use your personal mobile phone (or other device) for data or calls be aware that this may incur a cost. Our advice is not to incur any personal costs unless you have written agreement that this will be reimbursed by the employer.
  • Where you face workload pressures due to IT failures follow the advice on workloads on our website here https://www.napo.org.uk/workloads You may need to fill in a foreseeability notice (also available on the same page) and a stress risk assessment (following your employer’s process).
  • Remember to raise the issue in supervision with your line manager and make sure it is recorded in the notes of the meeting. Remember that, while your manager is not responsible for the IT failure, it is their responsibility to work with you to identify what essential tasks need to be (or can be) completed and what tasks cannot be done. Any plan made should be recorded (handwritten if necessary).
Ian Lawrence General Secretary
Katie Lomas National Chair

--oo00oo--

Stop Press - tweet from Digital & Technology MoJ:-
"We have had major disruption to a number of our IT systems this week. Most systems are now improving. We would like to apologise to everyone who has been affected. We are continuing to work with our suppliers to rectify remaining issues as quickly as possible."

16 comments:

  1. This may be relevent.

    https://www-chroniclelive-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.chroniclelive.co.uk/business/business-news/firm-tracks-offenders-national-probation-15699309.amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chroniclelive.co.uk%2Fbusiness%2Fbusiness-news%2Ffirm-tracks-offenders-national-probation-15699309

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A Newcastle IT company whose software is used by 18,000 members of staff at the National Probation Services (NPS) has been sold.

      Beaumont Colson’s (BCL) nDelious software is used by the NPS to manage offenders through the entire probationary system. It tracks their case from the moment of arrest, while they are in prision, as well as during their time in the community.


      The company, based on Newbridge Street, has been acquired by national player The Unilink Group.

      Unilink said the tie-up would fuel its international expansion and allow it to create integrated systems from justice departments overseas.

      Francis Toye, CEO and founder of The Unilink Group, said: “From the very first we have found enthusiasm and energy from the team in BCL that matches our own. The fit between these two innovative organisations and the logic of the tie-up is irrefutable. I am delighted that BCL is joining The Unilink Group today.”

      Along with providing software for the NPS, Beaumont also carries out work for MTC-Novo, which runs the London and Thames Valley Community Rehabilitation Company. Its other clients include the Home Office, and the States of Jersey and Guernsey.

      The company employs 45 members of staff at its Newcastle office, which Unilink has pledged to keep open.

      Paul Ryder, Beaumont Colson’s technical director, said: “The combination of Unilink’s and BCL’s skill sets will support the evolution of a generation of new products, extend our reach and allow us to provide enhanced service to existing customers and to new ones.”

      Following the acquisition The Unilink Group now employs around 120 members of staff and has a turnover of between £12-£13m across the UK, EU and Australia. The company also has a base in North America.

      Over the last four years Unilink has trebled in size. It now consists of four companies: Unilink Software, BCL, Unilink Technology Services, and Acante.

      Unilink’s software applications are used by more than 80 organisations with almost 70,000 prisoners across the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Austria.

      Delete
    2. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/18/cjsm_secure_email_court_prosecutors_outage/

      Delete
    3. Barristers and court prosecutors have been left scratching their heads this morning after Egress Technologies' CJSM email system went down – with the firm saying it could take up to a fortnight to fully restore it.

      CJSM stands for Criminal Justice Secure eMail. The network is used by Crown prosecutors, judges and other "public sector justice organisations" in England, Wales and elsewhere.

      For reasons that were not immediately clear, Egress Technologies, provider of CJSM, said in an emailed update to users seen by The Register that restoring CJSM would involve wiping their mailboxes for up to two weeks.

      "We estimate the restoration process to take up to 2 weeks, however we will provide an update as this progresses over the next few days," said Egress' CJSM update email to users.

      Legal sources familiar with CJSM told The Register they had been experiencing problems with the system this week before last night's ongoing outage happened. We are told that CJSM is the main way for Crown Prosecution Service workers to send legal instructions to prosecuting barristers at court.

      In addition, the wiping of inboxes will hit users and the criminal court system particularly hard because critical documents are routinely sent to people who need them over CJSM.

      Naturally, frustrated legal eagles started venting on Twitter about the outage, and in keeping with the news media's recent tradition of reproducing things that you yourself could find with 10 seconds' effort, here are a couple of angry tweets:

      "Well I have to hand it to them, CJSM is indeed up and running but not running as it should be because indeed as they said it would, my data has all gone and if the other promise is true I won't get it back for up to 2 weeks!"

      "So anyone relying on CJSM webmail may find they have no access to their mailbox for 2 weeks?!?......so only those who have downloaded the received materials and/or use an email client to for their mail will have access (of which CJSM does not support any email clients)"

      Egress Technologies had not responded, by the time of writing, to our questions about why the outage happened and what the company was doing to fix it. We will update this article if they get back to us.

      A few years ago we revealed evident shortcomings in the hardware keeping CJSM up, following a number of brown-outs.

      Update
      The Ministry of Justice eventually got round to saying this: "Around an eighth of users (75,000) of the Criminal Justice secure email system (CJSM) have been affected over the last 36 hours but are now able to send and receive emails again. The overwhelming majority (550,000) were unaffected. We will be restoring the email history of those affected over the next few days.”

      Delete
  2. As a CRC PO,NPS failures to me include; a superior attitide, crap PSRs, crap risk assessment, incomplete CPS, and a general unwillingness to work together to manage marginal cases. I am sick of being looked down on, of being spoken to like I don't deserve any respect and of demands being placed upon me even though I provided the update before the case was adjourned, get systems in place NPS, you are a joke

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The old "divide and conquer" that MOJ tried last time they wanted to give out probation contacts to private companies. Is this a real CRC PO or another MOJ stooge stiring up trouble?

      Delete
    2. It's a good point and given the anonymous nature of this site, we may never know. What is interesting is the growing use of the Facebook 'secret' group for staff to discuss things, mostly under real identities, whilst use of this platform reduces. The moderated Napo discussion forum died some time ago of course.

      Delete
    3. Think people are happier to use their real identities to speak up about probation nowadays - less to lose than in the past because so much has been lost already. Still essential to have the anonymous option though.

      Delete
    4. I think I am glad not to be "in" on the secret of the "secret Facebook Group" - in my life it has usually been better to stay away when one is not welcome.


      The Napo Message Forum was only ever a comparatively few active members - sadly few officers or officials engaged with the process and Napo never used it as a vehicle not even for their press releases - it was a wasted opportunity - like so many others.

      Still, now we are snuggled up with the Probation Institute (us Napo members) we seem to be absolutely on the fringes now - fancy an IT shutdown for a week and not a Press release.

      We know our place and it is not challenging the MOJ in any meaningful way.

      Delete
    5. Yes possibly and certainly agree about the need for an anonymous option. My concern is the declining quality and quantity of comment contributions which will inevitably lead to a cycle of increasing irrelevance - something that will undoubtedly be very welcome in certain quarters!

      Delete
    6. The passage of time also takes its toll & we've had a hardline Tory govt for 8 years now. If you were 16 in 2010 you'll be 24 now... I'm not involved in any exclusive facebook forum but occasional dicussions with colleagues across a variety of disciplines suggests that many 'people professions' are being increasingly populated by newly qualified, younger self-confident staff who have a preference for keeping cases they work with at a distance, are less inclined to 'get alongside' & more likely to 'do work to' rather than 'work with' their caseload, i.e. a clinical model which has innate power imbalances & tends to favour hard data & targets. A perfect environment for the MoJ's vision of probation vis-a-vis TR2 & the new NPS: "my way or the highway".

      Delete
    7. Professionalism has been replaced by a target driven economy.
      Whether you be butcher, baker or candlestick maker, your value is calculated on outcomes, units of productivity that can be easily measured in a constant pursuit of profit.
      Quantity trumps quality in todays world.

      Delete
  3. As a PO in the NPS I really don’t know how I can continue to try and manage my workload. I’m 136% on the WMT (is this normal?) I can no longer cope with the unrealistic demands and pressures placed on me & don’t know what to do. I have no clue who my union rep & I never really receive any information from Unison. The IT failure has just made the situation so much worse. I no longer feel I can do my work to the standard I would like. Are there any other NPS PO’s out there feeling the same?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm also an NPS PO. In our office we're all on the same sort of percentage and have been for far too many YEARS!!

    These days, I have the 'sod it' view. I don't overwork myself anymore, just do what I can at my pace. Nothing happens when oasys are not completed. Just record your contacts, compo er 're work that is targeted and do what you can with the remainder. Don't work over, I used to do but no more. If they want completing properly then get appropriate staffing levels. I'm far happier these days and less stressed. It's not worth it. They treat us all so badly, just look after yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. Stressing and burning yourself our doing more than u can is not going to do you any good. Or your team mates any good if you end up going off work with stress through pushing yourself over the limit.

      Delete