Friday 27 February 2015

Probation Institute

It's been some time since I've dared mention the Probation Institute on here because the subject tends to arouse some strong emotions, but then some readers have recently been suggesting the blog might be disconnected from the reality of life in CRCs and NPS. We may never know for sure of course and I suspect a blog can only ever be one reality and not the reality. So it is that, despite waves of opposition on here, we are told membership has now reached 1000. This from the CEO's blog:- 

"In January 2015 our membership passed the 1000 milestone, and is growing day by day! This represents a significant achievement in a short time. More than that it demonstrates the commitment of many of those who work in probation in the future, as a concept and in the professional practice and ethical value base that supports it.

I anticipate that the next six months will be even busier for the Institute. Members will have received notification of the new governance arrangements following a period of consultation at the end of last year. We will be introducing these from February to April, electing a Representative Council and a new Board to take forward the leadership of the Institute from May. This is realising a key objective: the Institute should be member led. It is vital that Institute members take up this challenge and opportunity. So do think about coming forward for election to the Representative Council. And if you aren’t already a member, join!"


Now before there's a chorus of 'well most have been dragooned and signed up free by CRCs', I'll say you may well be correct, but the thing is still quietly motoring along and on Sunday evening will have concluded on-line voting for the 'Representative Council', so lets take a look at some of the candidates. Interest doesn't seem too great in the North West where the one candidate is assured of election, but in the South West and South Central region, competition is very keen with five candidates and they include some fascinating names like:- 

ANDREW BRIDGES “Please don’t vote for me if you want a representative who is driven by a particular sectional ideology....I offer something different from that: well-informed fair-mindedness. My aim is to help probation be successful, whoever is doing it, and if this approach appeals to you, please vote for me."

MIKE MCCLELLAND “I have been involved with the Probation Institute since its inception and have been a member of the Steering Group since it was formed. I would welcome the opportunity to continue my involvement as an active member. There is much to be done in terms of the development of a training framework and the transfer of responsibility of practitioners from NOMS to the Institute."

MAXINE MYATT “I am putting myself forward because I want to contribute as much as I can to maintaining the standards of probation practice, defending professionalism and ensuring our knowledge base continues to develop during the churn generated by the TR programme and beyond. I have lived and breathed probation for all my working life. At this crossroads in its history I seek to do everything I can to use my skills and experience to support the Institute achieve its twin ambitions of providing professional leadership and becoming a centre of excellence.”
    

In the West Midlands we have three candidates including:-

KEITH STOKELD “A vote for my nomination would allow me to follow the following objectives as part of the representative council ensuring that: • The consultation with members continues to sustain the kind of governance arrangements that remain robust and achieve members’ objectives • Membership categories are inclusive, reflecting the make-up of the Probation Service • Committees within the Governance arrangements remain representative of the membership and provide an appropriate balance of power with the partner forum • To ensure the PI becomes the recognised and respected body to promote probation practice • Ensure the institute carries the objectives of the members in a way that commands the respect of all connected with the Probation Service. • The Probation Institute shapes the agenda for a future of a service that overcomes the ravages of the divide.”

There are four candidates standing in Humberside, Lincolnshire and Yorkshire including a very good friend of probation:-

PAUL SENIOR “I would represent staff in the region with passion and commitment and believe that probation plays a vital role in the rehabilitation process. This is a formative time for the Institute and the role of the Representative Council will be vital to maintaining the right direction as the Institute develops. I will use my knowledge and skills of probation to pursue these goals. It is a difficult time for the future of probation and it is important that we work together, listening and supporting each other to maintain the world of probation. I believe I understand these issues and can make a singular contribution to the development of the Institute.”

But possibly most surprising of all, in the East Region the four candidates includes:-

NEIL MOLONEY “I firmly believe that one of the leadership functions of any CRC CEO is to promote the stability and integration of the wider Probation system. Advocacy for, and support of, a strong, independent and representative Probation Institute is a key means of achieving this stability and integration at a time when there is a significant risk of fragmentation and fracture. If elected I will use my influence and authority to promote the work of the Institute amongst fellow CRC CEO’s. I would also use my position within Sodexo to encourage our new owners to support the Institute and its aims and values - a task which I have already begun.”

With this whole dogs breakfast that probation is rapidly becoming, I don't think I'm surprised by anything any more, not least what Napo's position is on all this. Seeing as they were one of the 'founding' organisations, they've been remarkably quiet on the subject of late, possibly confirming that the readership of this blog may not be as out of touch with reality as has been recently suggested. There have been repeated calls for Napo to pull out of the Institute and I'm sure it's only a matter of time before the subject is re-visited, either within the NEC or on the floor of the next AGM.    

PS - I notice the subject got no mention in todays increasingly pedestrian blog by Napo General Secretary Ian Lawrence.  

18 comments:

  1. Mike mclelland and Keith stokefield... Are national napo reps

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shameful, despicable and contradictory to working as a Napo rep or employee.

      How many of those candidates are current front-line practitioners?

      Delete
    2. Keith is a Probation Officer

      Delete
    3. Keith Stokeld is NAPO's Treasurer and Mike McClelland is a National Official.

      Delete
    4. Keith Stokeld gets 50% facility time. The other 50% he's a probation officer.

      Delete
    5. I know Keith well, have worked with him over a number of years and quite frankly I am appauled by the fact he is standing for this as indeed Mike, whom I've never me.

      Delete
  2. From where springeth Mike McClelland's mandate to seek a representative role on the PI. He is paid by the membership to represent their interests in a so-called 'member-led' union. Is he seeking this position for selfish reasons or on behalf of Napo? If elected, will he be 'representing' in his own time or paid Napo time?

    There has been absolutely no attempt by the Napo leadership to engage on the PI. The PI membership has been bloated for political reasons through the corporate funding of membership fees, which would have included personal details being passed on to a third party without the consent of members. Napo's position on the PI is hypocritical and sneaky.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are two perspectives on the PI: one to ignore and boycott, the other to join and influence the direction it takes. I am boycotting it until I know what my future in Probation actually is (I am at a significant risk of redundancy). I would not criticise Mike or Keith for taking the alternative position. I know and trust them both and would feel better knowing they are in there rather than many others I could (but will not) name. NAPO cannot do right by many at the moment but I consider them to be in an invidious position at the moment. We cannot stop the train so need to decide whether we get on or watch it roll off into the distance without us. Both actions will draw criticism.

    Rob Palmer
    NAPO East Anglia Branch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The sadness is Napo have not developed a disengagement policy for the time being.

      Ultimately PI maybe the right organisation but the timing is too soon or too late & I am not clear where it leaves Napo's Professional Committee work.

      In view of thre not being a definite motion from 'the floor' to disengage - I presume the NEC had to take some action to get Napo at the centre of the organisation.

      What I find so despicable is the PIs complete public silence on the main issue of TR which makes what we have now more dangerous than what preceded - namely the split.

      I have had past contact with Mike and respected him, I am not so sure now. I think he is in an awful position. Meanwhile MOJ seem planning to bring Napo to their knees by ending the direct deductions from salary.

      That is at least one issue Labour could make a public stand about NOW - presumably they do still believe in Trades Unions being active in the workplaces?

      Delete
  4. Dear Rob
    the golden rule is never,ever get on a train that is going in the wrong direction...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the generic Mike's and Keith's of this world wish to take alternative positions, then it's a free country, but these particular namesakes are in positions of leadership in Napo and Napo is scared of actually consulting with it's membership about the PI. 'Member-led' is as nauseous a phrase as '£46 in your pocket'. If they haven't got a mandate then they are self-serving and are patronising the membership – and in the case of the funded Mike, at our expense. The PI is the condom with which the MoJ screwed Napo.

      Delete
    2. Ergo the PI is full to the brim & no-one should be fiddling around with it lest there be an unintended outcome.

      Leave well alone!

      Delete
  5. I have joined the PI, but the emails I get are regular and I have instantly deleted al of them. Not at all relevant yet. I can see a time when the PI takes over the Professional Association bit of NAPO, and that should bring NAPO subs down quite a bit. Maybe the Probation Journal will go to PI?

    The membership is still pitiful though, so not sure how it can be credible at present. I won't be voting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. On the blog of the general secretary, what is he doing by being an errand boy for Michael Spurr? Michael 'engaged' with Chris Grayling about the pay claim. And though knocked back, Chris wants everyone to know that he values the hard work of probation staff. A pedestrian blog? A pathetic blog. But nice to see that Ian and Michael are singing from the same song sheet!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Quite frankly if this is NAPO's future I want no part. Its good night, god bless - well perhaps not the later. The QUESTION MARK has been hanging over NAPO for sometime and they are doing little for CRC staff.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Involvement with the PI is a dreadful mistake by NAPO. Again. Getting sick of this...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS - the "robot test" is a bit unusual this morn. Is it the salvador dali version?

      Delete
  9. I only joined PI because it was free and was bullied into it by management.

    ReplyDelete