Wednesday 7 May 2014

Latest From Napo 27

Here's the latest email from Napo HQ sent to all members earlier today. I'll refrain from passing comment on the Accountability, Decision Making & Social Media section and instead leave readers to decide from whose perspective social media might be regarded as either 'good' or 'bad':-

Dear All

Here’s a brief update on a range of issues.  There will be further information in the campaign bulletins and the new edition of Napo News is now available here.  Within the next couple of weeks the new website will be up and running which will give members much easier access to all of Napo’s briefing papers including specifics on TR and press statements.  Most members will have received letters formally assigning them to their jobs in the two new organisations.  That these came over the weekend is as clear as signal as any of the complete disregard shown to staff by NOMS- please see the TR bulletins on the website for further guidance here.

Legal challenges
We have issued our Pre-Action Protocol letter (Judicial Review) to the Government and we received a response last Friday.  The letter we sent was as wide ranging as the numerous problems we have with TR.  Needless to say, the Treasury Solicitor merely defends the government position.  Broadly, that TR is a demonstrable success, that service delivery is unaffected that there is no increase of bureaucracy and so on and so forth.  A number of issues arise out of that response and the next job is to decipher which are the strongest policy arguments (to be used in parliamentary challenges) and which are legal points (for JR).
Legal issues are not only those that would be examined in the High Court because others may be for the Employment Tribunal.  For example, issues of discrimination in the assignment process, material changes to job descriptions without agreement etc.  We will be exploring some of those cases and Judicial Review at a meeting with leading counsel today.

The Split 
This is taking the most terrible toll on members and it is so vital that we try and remain united in the face of this.  The case transfers and workloads are hitting members hard.  High workloads are a legitimate issue for grievances, stress risk assessment and local disputes.  These industrial relations issues will transfer into the new organisations and will leave an audit trail to keep you protected if anything goes wrong.  Above all, make sure you look after your own health.  If you suffer stress, anxiety, sleeplessness etc. we advise you to fill out an Accident & Incident form and keep a copy.  Remember that if there is no record, it’s very hard to prove later down the line.  If you are excessively stressed, please see your doctor immediately.

Many of these problems are imposed on us by government but some we have more control over.  Accounts from members highlight their distress and the shocking crassness displayed by some Trusts.  Arguments over assigning interview rooms and parking spaces to NPS and CRC beggar belief, NPS staff being referred to as “top dogs” etc. are disgraceful and do not need to happen.  One of the biggest risks we face is an “us and them” environment.  Of course, this is exactly what the government wants - an atomised, unorganised and weakened workforce- but it is within our grasp to resist this.  It is not our job title or employer that defines our opposition to the sell-off, it is our union membership.

Accountability, Decision Making & Social Media
The National Executive Committee met last week.  Many of you will be familiar with the structure of Napo but some less so.  The NEC comprises of two representatives of each branch and the Family Court Section elected locally with national black reps elected nationally.  They are empowered to make decisions on behalf of Napo in between the AGMs.  They vote on various issues with a voting strength based on the number of members in their branch.  Part of their role is to act as the employer of Napo staff hence why some of their work is confidential (in line with HR good practice and employment law).  NEC Reps report back to branches on national matters and branches can feed information up to Officers and Officials through this channel.  Apart from NEC confidential documents, all papers are copied to branch Chairs and Secretaries.  This is the way Napo is accountable to its members and we would encourage as many of you as possible to take part in branch meetings and get involved.


There is a great amount of activity on social media; some good, some bad.  Where it is anonymous we can’t respond to it because there’s no accountability.  For Napo members wanting to influence policy, please put motions for debate through your branch and take a visible part in the process. 

campaigns@napo.org.uk
Some of the examples you have sent in have been referred to lawyers and we are compiling a dossier of issue “types” which will go in the parliamentary bulletins which will be sent out every week and copied to members.  We guarantee your personal information will be protected.  There will be more information on this in the next campaign bulletins.


Best wishes,

TOM RENDON              IAN LAWRENCE
National Chair               General Secretary

   

25 comments:

  1. Thanks for bringing it to a wider audience

    ReplyDelete
  2. The editorial on social media caught my eye, too. I think it's a bit fallacious to say they cannot respond to points made anonymously because there is no accountability. I suppose you could apply the same curious logic to whistle-blowers, or rape victims who may speak with their voices disguised and their appearance silhouetted. And Nixon would have stayed in the White House had it not been for Deep Throat! The truth is they are responding all the time, but they cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that some of the harsh criticisms they have received have actually made sense. Their communications have improved and in part I blame those unaccountable anonymous contributers to blogsites!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Their communications have improved and in part I blame those unaccountable anonymous contributers to blogsites!"

      ROFL!

      Delete
    2. I accept the blame fully.

      Delete
  3. Oh, it was you was it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Message from my CEO that was posted on our bulletin board:

    'we are coming through what is probably the most difficult period of the Mobilisation phase of the TR Programme. The caseload split has gathered momentum and at a time when vacancies still exist and even when these are being filled it creates gaps elsewhere, which all makes transfer problematical. We have also seen the introduction over the past couple of weeks of the first two phases of the new procedures, including the use of the RSR, the Case Allocation Tool and most recently the Risk Review and Escalation process. On top of this many colleagues took a well earned break over the Easter holidays which will have added to the pressures locally over this time. Despite all of that the indicators are that mobilisation is progressing as well as might be expected, with staff and managers getting on with both the ordinary and the extraordinary tasks required in the usual impressive way and with a high level of professional pride. You are all doing a great job and the Board and Senior Leaders could ask no more. Whilst there is still some way to go the attitude and commitment of all to date provides confidence that we will make it. As ever the watchword needs to be proceed with caution, continuing to balance progress towards the next waypoint with the risk of progressing too quickly - avoiding such risk is much more important than getting everything done by a certain date. During the past two weeks we have had visits from both the Business Systems Readiness Test Team (an independent team checking on the TR Programme's progress), Mark Read the Director of the TR programme and the Regional NOMS Manager. On all occasions we have given a full and frank account of where things are up to and our belief that whilst the changes are not of our making and they are creating real pressure points, our staff are engaging with them in a professional way and we are making progress.

    However, we acknowledge that there are particular pressure points in some parts of the Trust and we ant to support staff and managers in getting through those. We are working hard to get all staff to where they need to be and in particular trying to move report demands away from LDUs. By the end of the month we are confident staff will be feeling the benefits of that. In the meantime we are asking those staff engaged in report writing for courts to concentrate on generating and recording sufficient information to inform the sentencing process and case assignment decision. Detailed assessment should follow as part of the sentence planning process in all cases.

    We are also proposing that NPS and CRC senior LDU leaders confer and agree to a 2 day operational closedown before the end of May to allow staff to catch up with all the elements of the caseload transition. We hope that this pause in day to day routines will give a real chance for LDU staff to 'catch their breath' and get alongside their immediate priorities.

    We will stay in touch with operational units via LDU managers and explore any other realistic suggestions for helping us all to move through the next few weeks safely and supporting each other.

    END

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All running smoothly then.....?

      Delete
    2. Thanks - lets hope the media take a look - I have Tweeted it!

      https://twitter.com/Andrew_S_Hatton/status/464112702877880320

      Delete
  5. "We are also proposing that NPS and CRC senior LDU leaders confer and agree to a 2 day operational closedown before the end of May to allow staff to catch up with all the elements of the caseload transition. We hope that this pause in day to day routines will give a real chance for LDU staff to 'catch their breath' and get alongside their immediate priorities." I guess this has nothing to do with delius being down for several days and the weekend for spliting the it systems apart.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Smoothly?? Seriously?? The courts are in a truly terrible state - no-one in LDUs know how to allocate cases, staff advised to reduce reporting for clients to monthly yup it is really going well.....

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well I've done the TR training and 16 working days to going live! Sadly, none the wiser. Except I now know the sale date has been put back to December 2014 and it appears they want us to carry on as usual, presumably so as to get it up and running and looking attractive to bidders. The point consistently missed is that things will change when CRC's become profit making, risk averse organisations proper. One of the facilitators did drop a little gossip in from a colleague in another area; seemingly there is a Plan B - which seems well established, perhaps moreso than Plan A - that is, a means whereby we all come back together again under MoJ if things don't work out. Phew! Only the 'staff conference' to go - something of a wake I think, and my working life, as I have known it for so long, will disintegrate into chaos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That may be worth exploring further Plan B , how might that look? A failure to sell CRC leaves it under the overall control of MoJ - how will that work? Perhaps with CRC still wholly public and reporting to the Deputy Director in the area! What will happen to PbR since Wright and Grayling say that public service can't carry the risk?Will the bidders want to putting cash at risk when the game is fixed! .....I think we could develop a good Plan B based on the failing Plan A.....Any views??

      Delete
  8. Same here, there seems to be a massive disconnect between what management say is happening to actually what is happening on the ground.
    When even the trainers say its a bad idea and unclear while delivering the training, you know its proper shite.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't get that post, things are on course and running well, which service are they looking at. I am assigned to CRC and continuing with my high risk work oral hearing. writing PSR's, Parom's etc. Which part is running smoothly. Also the split is going to happen in June/July when there is a World Cup and Wimbledon, everyone wants leave, there will be half of a half service left during this period on both sides to manage cases, how is this going to work out, if cases and risks are not managed/monitored properly there will be SFO's, I suppose Grayling will have to justify to the communities why they are not protected throughout this period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't actually thought of the timing of the split in relation to major sporting events, summer holidays, kids of school etc. I bet I'm not the only one either. I'd wager that many trying to implement TR haven't given that a thought. Its going to be of more significant headache for areas where sectors are under prescribed.
      God bless HR!!

      Delete
  10. I don't think many people have, I do try and think ahead as I have also mentioned previously about the low number of black staff assigned to NPS even before the figures came out and no one listened to me and started making it an issue weeks later when they got the figures, they could have taken action sooner if any action has beeng taken. I suppose the same would happen again with this thought of mine, no one will pay any attention until it hits them. However, I have advised Unison today, as I was trying to book my leave. We have no CRC manager at our office, so I will have to ask the NPS senior to authorise my leave, he will not be aware as to others in the CRC taking leave at the same time, this could mean that there maybe no CRC staff during the summer, NPS will have to cover the work and visa versa. We are already being split into smaller divisions, making leave and OD add to that sick leave difficult to cover, who ever thinks that things are going smoothly needs to have a serious rethink.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will yet live up to the title of biggest omnishambles ever...

      Delete
  11. No account has been taken of resilience in small offices. Split is unworkable on many rural areas of the country.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry I forgot to add during my rant which continues, today the unions have sent a letter asking for an extension, they did not include in it this point of the timing during summer and leave etc. which would have added significant weight to their argument for an extension.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Has anyone thought about creating an online petition to highlight the dissection that is engulfing the probation service? Change.org
    would seem like a good platform...

    ReplyDelete
  14. " Rob Palmer favorited a Tweet you were mentioned in
    5h:
    @CarsonTim @Andrew_S_Hatton #Napo #probation #TR.


    Office. Dishwasher broken down. Is it confused if it should be an NPS or CRC "


    "Rob Palmer ‏@robpalmerpcbio 1h @leftunion1349 @CarsonTim @Andrew_S_Hatton


    It is no longer sure which way to spin.."


    Boom, Boom!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think Grayling is becoming demonic.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10815018/Skull-Cracker-Jail-must-mean-jail-for-violent-criminals.html

    ReplyDelete
  16. As it ever was: -

    "Hard cases make bad law!"

    ReplyDelete
  17. letter to Trust Chief Executives dated 1st April

    the Probation Institute will be hosting its first two professional practice conferences in the summer, one on the 13 June in London at Mary Ward House, 5 - 4 Tavistock Rd and the other on the 20 June at the Royal York Hotel.

    The professional conferences are mainly being targeted at front-line staff and middle managers, engaging them on professional practice issues and probation ethics and values. We aim to provide excellent professional development and networking opportunities for those who attend and to involve them in the work and agenda of the PI at an early stage. Both conferences will follow similar agendas and themes.

    We would like to invite you to nominate delegates from your Trust to attend. The fee per delegate is £50 which will include a full day's conference programme and refreshments/lunch. There will also be opportunities at the conference for delegates, who have not already done so, to sign up in a personal capacity to become a founder member of he Probation Institute.
    ________________________________________________

    Conference Programme:

    Are you a probation practitioner or involved in supporting the delivery of probation services? Are you interested in developments in probation practice?

    We invite you to attend one of the PI two inaugural professional practice conferences this summer.

    The PI is independent, professional membership body, committed to promoting the identity of probation and supporting professional development and quality of practice.

    Our summer conferences will provide excellent professional development and networking opportunities, bringing together professionals and others with a shared interest in the sector at a time of major change.

    1. The professional values, ethics and identity of probation. Prof Rob Canton, De Montfort Uni
    2. Developing and evaluating professional practice. Prof Loraine Gelsthorpe, University of Cambridge; Lol Burke, LJMU
    3. Breakout workshop : selection of topics on professional and innovative practice.

    ReplyDelete