Wednesday 4 January 2023

Prisons and Parole

I notice former award-winning BBC Home Affairs journalist Danny Shaw has unearthed some extraordinary facts surrounding the prison crisis and Raab's parole changes:-

The Government's open secret...

Last November, when the Prisons Minister, Damian Hinds, told the House of Commons that up to 400 police cells would be used to hold prisoners because of a lack of capacity in jails across England and Wales he didn't reveal the whole picture.

Hinds said that the emergency police cell plan, known as Operation Safeguard, was being activated because of an "acute and sudden increase in the prison population". He said this was partly due to strike action by criminal barristers which had led to "significantly higher numbers of offenders on remand." He added that as court hearings had resumed there had been a "surge in offenders" in the criminal justice system placing pressure on prisons, particularly those which which hold men.

The rise in the prison population, however, was entirely foreseeable. It had been forecast by officials in Hinds's own department 12 months earlier, not because of the barristers' strike, but due to courts opening up again after the pandemic, an anticipated increase in police officer numbers leading to more arrests and prosecutions and various sentencing changes. The analysts reckoned that by July 2022 there'd be 84,800 prisoners and by November 87,000. The population levels and projections are shown in the table, below:


You might have thought, therefore, that when the projections were published in November 2021 ministers would have embarked on a plan to deal with the expected increase. Hinds's statement, setting out the need to requisition police cells as an emergency measure, shows that they completely failed to do so. This lack of planning has appalled criminal justice experts I have spoken to.

In fact, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) got lucky, because the rise in the prison population has turned out to be far lower than projected. In July, there were just under 81,000 prisoners and in November around 83,000 - that's 4,000 fewer than forecast. There may have been a sudden uptick in numbers during the year, but the increase was well within the estimates officials had produced months earlier.

The Prisons Minister also left out other crucial facts from his Commons statement. He didn't mention that since 2010 the Government had closed 20 prisons, ostensibly to save money, without replacing enough of the cell spaces lost. He also didn't say that the ambitious prison building programme, which aims to provide 20,000 additional places by the mid-2020s, is already bogged down in planning disputes. HMP Five Wells, in Northamptonshire, opened in 2022, Fosse Way, in Leicestershire, will be operational in the next few months and a new jail near Full Sutton prison is on track for 2025, but other new sites have yet to be approved. If the prison population carries on rising at anything approaching the rates forecast (98,000 within three years) more extreme emergency measures will be required. The last thing ministers would want to do is to release some prisoners early, to free up space, but unless they grip the capacity issue that will be the only feasible alternative.

There is one final thing that Hinds omitted from his Parliamentary statement: the shortage of prison capacity has been exacerbated by Government policy, specifically, a new approach towards Category D prisons, also known as 'open' prisons.

Security in open prisons is less stringent than other jails, with inmates allowed out for work, training and family visits. As a result, the establishments are not suitable for the vast majority of offenders. They are designed to hold those who are coming up for release and pose a low risk of harm to the public. They're also intended for long-term prisoners as a way of testing, in a more relaxed environment, whether they're ready to be let out: can they be trusted, how do they respond to being in the community, could they be safely managed on licence? Open prisons are a vital stepping stone between incarceration and freedom...but occasionally the test goes badly wrong.

In February 2022, a life sentence prisoner, Paul Robson, who had been jailed for sexually assaulting a woman at knifepoint, went missing from North Sea Camp, an open prison in Lincolnshire. Robson left a dummy in his bed, climbed out of a window and made off on a bicycle. His disappearance led to a nationwide manhunt before he was recaptured and sparked concern about decision-making at the Parole Board, the independent quasi-judicial body whose job it is to recommend to the MoJ moves to open prisons by lifers, such as Robson, and other indeterminate sentence inmates.

The Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, had already decided to oversee the most sensitive cases himself, rather than delegating decisions to MoJ officials, but the Robson case convinced him further changes were needed. The Parole Board was given fresh guidance, so that it could recommend a transfer only if a prisoner was assessed to present a "low risk" of absconding and if it was considered "essential" in terms of preparing for their possible release. The Justice Secretary also gave himself greater powers to block the Board's recommendations, to ensure an open prison move did not "undermine public confidence in the wider criminal justice system." Previously, he could thwart a recommendation only in limited circumstances - if it went against expert advice without an explanation, was based on inaccurate information or where there wasn't a wholly persuasive case for the move.

The changes, which were signalled after Robson's disappearance in February, came fully into force last June and have had a dramatic effect.

In the 12 months leading up to April 2022, the Parole Board made 568 recommendations for offenders to transfer to open prisons, an average of 47 per month. Of the 549 recommendations processed, 515 were accepted by the MoJ - a 94 per cent acceptance rate. Since then, the number of recommendations has dropped and acceptances have plummeted.

Here are the latest figures, provided to me by the Parole Board:

April: 27 recommendations made, 0 accepted
May: 24 recommendations made, 3 accepted
June: 24 recommendations made, 2 accepted
July: 28 recommendations made, 1 accepted
August: 25 recommendations made, 5 accepted
September: 43 recommendations made, 7 accepted
October: 22 recommendations made, 9 accepted

So, during the seven months there were 193 recommendations that a life sentence or indeterminate sentence prisoner should move to an open prison, an average of 28 per month, down from 47.

A total of 27 recommendations were granted, an acceptance rate of 14 per cent, compared with 94 per cent in the previous 12 months.

The aim of Raab's new approach is laudable - to bolster public safety and confidence in the criminal justice system - but there's a risk that it merely stores up problems that prison staff, the Parole Board and ministers will have to confront further down the line. The wise and experienced Director of the Prison Reform Trust, Peter Dawson, a former governor, believes the policy is "irrational".

Although it's too early to draw conclusions, one thing is already clear: the policy has added to the capacity problems across the prison estate. Hundreds of cells in open prisons are lying vacant, because fewer offenders are being dispatched there, while other overcrowded jails have run out of room. On 2 December 2022, there were 642 empty bed spaces in men's open prisons - surprising reading, perhaps, for the chief constables who were told to make space for prisoners in police custody suites.

Here is a list of the open prisons and spare bed spaces, drawn from data supplied by the MoJ.

Ford 2
Hatfield 36
Haverigg 94
Hollesley Bay 21
Kirkham 216
Kirklevington Grange 20
Leyhill 23
North Sea Camp 57
Prescoed 13
Spring Hill 14 (figure from April 2022)
Standford Hill 23
Sudbury 74
Thorn Cross 49

Damian Hinds didn't talk about the unused cells in open prisons when he made his statement in November. It would have been embarrassing for him to admit that policies introduced by his own boss had contributed to such an imbalance of capacity across the prison estate. But if Raab carries on with his approach, if the overwhelming number of suggested transfers to open prisons continues to be blocked, more cells there will sit empty while precious space elsewhere, particularly in categories B and C jails, will be squeezed.

It's the open secret the Government hasn't been open about.

Danny Shaw

28 comments:

  1. I'm sure I remember that episode of Porridge: "Robson left a dummy in his bed, climbed out of a window and made off on a bicycle."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read yesterday that the Justice Select Committee have launched an inquiry into the reasons why so many prison officers are leaving the service so soon after joining. Not enough staff and the staff they do manage to keep lack experience. (Maybe the inquiry should be extended to cover all of HMPPS?). The flagship of the new prison building programme HMP Berwyn has recently had to introduce anti corruption training for staff due to the number of prison officers that have been prosecuted for having relationships with prisoners.
    I also read the following which reminded me of Labour's contribution a to the prisons problem whilst they were in office. The resurrection of the 'tough on crime' mantra doesn't evoke much confidence. It's politicians once again playing to the crowd, trying to please the public rather then actually trying to solve the problems. In reality, when it comes to the CJS, there's not a lot of difference between Conservative and Labour, it's just about how they can exploit the current problems to increase their vote count.

    https://novaramedia.com/2023/01/02/the-uk-has-its-own-mass-incarceration-crisis/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jan/05/900000-crimes-committed-by-people-on-bail-under-tories-analysis-finds

    London probation being investigated by MOJ. Bingo cards at the ready. I have "strong and effective leadership" and "failure to assess risk adequately" on mine, with a recommendation that everyone is now MAPPA L2 unless Rabb says otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. The London director will need to resign as is inadequate.
      2. The London Heads of Operations and all Heads of inadequate PDUs will need to step down as all are inadequate.

      Delete
    2. “London probation services after they were condemned for a lack of staff and poor management.”

      That needs to be reworded to say poor SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP.

      Delete
    3. Nearly 900,000 offences including murder, kidnap, and child rape, have been committed by people on bail in England and Wales since the Conservatives came to power, a new analysis has found.

      The latest government figures show more than 20,000 offences were committed by those released from custody as they awaited a hearing, equating to 55 offences a day.

      More than 7,200 sexual offences, including some committed against children as young as 12, were also committed by people on bail since 2010, of which 260 were committed in the last recorded year of 2021.

      The data, released to Labour after a parliamentary question, came as the Ministry of Justice launched a review of London probation services after they were condemned for a lack of staff and poor management.

      The independent review of London probation would be led by a senior MoJ official, the government said on Thursday, after the service was condemned by the chief inspector of probation, Justin Russell, for “shocking” standards.

      Delete
    4. "The independent review of London probation would be led by a senior MoJ official, the government said" - that'll work well then. One of the useless fuckers responsible for this whole shitshow is being appointed to reviwe the whole shitshow.

      Will they find themselves responsible? Or find their chums' responsible? No.

      Will it simply be yet more tonnes of bullshit to dump on frontline staff? Yes.

      Will Justin keep his job? Of course, because he has failed to direct his criticisms at those who are actually responsible... the string of politicians from Grayling onwards & the senior civil servants who have enthused about & overseen the complete decimation of probation services during the last 10 years. Right-wing Strong White Romeo, who was the Responsible Officer for TR then returned to MoJ to finish off the job she started, after a pleasant break in New York; Copple & Barton, who are the directors overseeing performance & change; Flynn as Chief Probation Officer; Rees as CEO, etc etc.

      Delete
    5. Unfortunately, Kilvinder Vigurs (London Director) and her senior leadership cronies are taking it out on staff by giving them more to do and sending them on useless training. Staff (particularly Offender Managers) are pressed for time and are now being made to waste more time on tick box exercises. The real issues are still not being addressed. Not only has the shit hit the fan but the leadership are so deep in it that they can’t see past shit, smell like shit and talk plenty of shit.

      The Probation Service needs to be put under special measures and all the shit in it removed.

      Delete
  4. https://touch.policeoracle.com/news/article.cfm?id=110344

    ReplyDelete
  5. From Russell Webster's summary:-

    Today’s action plan – which runs to 31 pages – sets out the MoJ’s & HMPPS response to all the inspectorates’ recommendations. It was good to read that a number of boroughs have received emergency staffing. For example, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster PDU has received six probation officers and eight probation service officers on detached duty and has been allocated thirteen newly qualified officers.

    The action plan notes that the primary inspectors’ concern that many people on probation had simply not been allocated a probation officer has now been addressed with all cases now allocated.

    Other actions include:

    All staff (Seniors, POs and PSOs) in PDUs rated as inadequate to attend quality development workshops designed to improve practice standards across the Assess, Change and Protect domains.

    Initiatives to ensure that seniors and probation practitioners ensure that the sentence of the court is fulfilled and that appropriate referrals are made to the range of Commissioned Rehabilitative Services and offending behaviour interventions.
    A programming of upskilling of senior probation officers in particular.

    A survey of everyone on probation in London to identify key issues and concerns – and suggestions to improving performance.

    A big focus on training on risk and safeguarding.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Shocking from London Probation. This is so short sighted and tedious to read. Not surprised that “All staff” is presented as “Seniors, POs and PSOs” who are are held accountable instead of the top brass senior managers that steered the service into destruction. Emergency staffing, quality development and training for is really not the solution.

    1. The London director should resign.
    2. The London Heads of Operations and Heads of inadequate PDUs should step down.
    3. Pay probation staff better wages and improve working conditions and recruitment practices.
    4. Stop using SFO, HMIP and other management processes to blame, bully and penalise staff.
    5. Go back to basics on what probation practice should be. This can only be achieved if probation is detached from the civil service, prisons and HMPPS.

    ReplyDelete
  7. From the Guardian. No investment in probation and a continued failed punitive approach.

    “Since 2010 we have also driven up average sentence lengths almost every year and increased convictions by 15%. And we are going further to improve our justice system, by recruiting an extra 20,000 police officers, creating 20,000 additional prison places and investing almost half a billion pounds to reduce the number of outstanding crown court cases.”

    ReplyDelete
  8. Same old, same old... its pathetic, its boring & its a national scandal.

    Not a single word or implied criticism of the political & civil service structure that over the last 8 years has imposed a catalogues of unnecessarily eye-wateringly expensive & damaging change upon probation services: "At least £500 million to sort out the mess he made when attempting to privatise the probation service (source: National Audit Office)"

    Not much made of the failed TR agenda, the useless contract managers (who were meant to audit the CRCs but saw nothing), the disastrous so-called reunification, the lack of pay, the lack of professional training, the failed IT projects, the 9 Justice Secs & the mass exodus of skilled, experienced staff...

    Not a single word about the £80m of public cash from the Cabinet Office Modernisation Fund intended to get rid of staff - or the fact that that money was simply given away to the CRCs.

    Not a single word about the £millions of public funds drained by the CRCs: "Transforming Rehabilitation has achieved poor value for money for the taxpayer. The Ministry has chosen to end the CRC contracts in 2020, 14 months early, but this comes at a cost. When added to previous, unsuccessful, efforts to stabilise CRCs, the Ministry will pay at least £467 million more than was required under the original contracts. It now estimates it will pay up to £2.3 billion under the contracts." (NAO)

    Not a single criticism of Antonia Romeo, of Amy Rees, of Phil Copple, of Flynn, Barton, Blakeman - or any of their willing regional directors - the so-called "excellent leaders" who have overseen this disgraceful debacle:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1102029/HMPPS_Org_Chart_-_September_2022.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  9. If the solution is a whole 3 Quality Development Officers, you’d think they’d at least get the job description right.

    68944 - Quality Development Officer
    Number of jobs available: 3
    Region: London
    Responsibilities, Activities & Duties
    “Respond to risk escalation requests raised by Community Rehabilitation Companies”

    https://justicejobs.tal.net/vx/lang-en-GB/mobile-0/appcentre-1/brand-15/xf-7ad3c4b7b506/candidate/so/pm/1/pl/3/opp/68944-68944-Quality-Development-Officer/en-GB

    ReplyDelete
  10. So, irrespective of our role in probation there appears to be measurable standards we need to meet for satisfactory performance usually discussed annually at appraisal time. Does anyone know what the performance metrics are for PDU heads? It does appear that many of the staffing issues, resource allocation and line management of SPOs issues so frequently discussed here fall within their remit/ responsibility and is the reason for higher salary reward. So, what are the the metrics those leaders are attaining/meeting given the current state of probation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 17:20 Oh that's a good question!

      Delete
    2. I hear the metrics are determined by a swatch/chart in Petty France that they use to measure how brown someone's nose is (as in to brown-nose, before the allegations start flying)

      Delete
    3. Even worse, irrespective of the severe lack of staff and documented poor senior management and leadership it is only those in SPO, PO and PSO roles who are not accountable for these failings that are held to measurable standards to evidence satisfactory performance.

      The entirety of the London probation Senior Management Team is responsible for its inadequacies in staffing, recruitment and retention that has crashed London probation, but it is the SPOs, POs and PSOs being blamed.

      Everyone is asking the same questions. What are the Senior Management Teams doing to “upskill” their RPDs, HoOps and Heads of PDUs and improve their own practice standards? Why are they not all on Performance Improvement Plans?

      Delete
    4. Anon 17:20 that’s a brilliant question. I hope this is answered and I hope Jim discusses it on a separate post. For too long Probation staff further down in the food chain has been scrutinised while the senior leadership get away with poor leadership. However, nothing will change if they are not held accountable. Perhaps they need to be named and shamed.

      Delete
    5. Google the London probation senior management team and all sorts of concerns come up but they are still there. In the past the senior management teams held themselves to account. Not any more as now they just blame the SPOs, POs and PSOs.

      “The Sonnex case triggered the resignation of David Scott, London's chief probation officer, amid claims that high caseloads, stress levels and sickness rates were contributing to a service in meltdown.”
      https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2009/nov/02/probation-service-monitoring-inquiry-sonnex

      Delete
    6. He didn’t resign though …

      “Andrew Blight, the interim deputy divisional director of NPS in London, told the jury on Tuesday morning: “We had been struggling with recruitment since 2014. Staff morale was low. Although it was two years after [the restructure], we were still working through a lot of the detail. The impact was still very, very much in effect and very much being felt.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/sep/03/murderer-probation-service-marvyn-iheanacho

      Delete
    7. … nor did she ..

      “Rajiv Menon, representing Amman's family, said to Carina Heckroodt, of the Probation Service: "Your failure to recall him was a most serious missed opportunity in this case."

      Ms Heckroodt replied: "I disagree, it was not a missed opportunity."

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-58281243

      Delete
  11. “Train drivers have been offered a 4% pay rise for two years in a row by the body which represents rail companies in a bid to end strike action.
    The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) has made its first offer to Aslef, the union for train drivers, after several strikes.
    The deal includes a backdated pay rise of 4% for 2022 and a 4% increase this year, but it also hinges on changes to working practices.”

    So train drivers held out and getting at least 8%. Probation officers caved in and got 3%. Thanks Napo and Unison.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "If accepted, the proposal would mean the base salary for the average driver would increase from £60,000, to almost £65,000 by the end of 2023."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's not do the govt's dirty work on this blog, @22:12. As with most jobs, quoted rates of pay pay are variable depending upon area, qualification, role & experience - & source.

      Reed recruitment: “Train drivers can expect to begin with an average starting salary of £30,000, with the highest salaries often exceeding £65,000. Train driver salaries can also differ between commercial or freight roles. The average freight train driver salary in the UK is £44,418."

      According to Reed, these are the average salaries for a train driver working in these companies:

      LNER – £30,000 to £70,000
      Transport for London  – £57,217 to £61,620
      Scotrail – £50,659 to £56,245
      Northern Rail – £40,104 to £57,546
      East Midlands Railway – £54,403 to £61,467
      Great Western Railway – £49,807 to £67,304
      Merseyrail – £50,572 to £55,415
      Southeastern Railway – £37,261 to £58,503

      But Reed also say:

      The Average Probation Officer salary in the UK is £46,388
      The Average Probation Officer salary in East London is £51,256
      The Average Probation Officer salary in Birkenhead is £47,668
      The Average Probation Officer salary in Croydon is £58,900

      Indeed say: "During training to become a probation officer, you'll likely earn around £22,261 per year. Upon qualifying, this rises to £29,038 plus allowances, which is Band 3 on the National Probation Service (NPS) pay bands. The salary for qualified probation officers can rise to £37,174, or Band 4"

      Salary bands in 2010:
      Band 6 = Area Manager; £39,037 - £46,650;
      Band 5 = Senior PO; £34,677 - £39,424;
      Band 4 = Probation Officer; £28,185 - £35,727;
      Band 3 = PSO; £21,391 - £27,102;

      UK MP basic salary 2010: £65,738
      UK MP basic salary 2022: £84,144

      Delete
  13. PDU heads are getting the biggest pay award under the pay deal. £15.000 increase in salary over 2 years!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which is why they encouraged you all to vote for the deal.

      Delete
  14. Have I misread this or is there a typo? 216 vacancies in Kirkham??!!

    ReplyDelete