Saturday 26 November 2022

Raab Update

This from the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies eBulletin yesterday:- 

Is the Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, prepared to take decisive action to address the multiple injustices of the imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence?

Speaking to the House of Commons Justice Committee earlier this week, he acknowledged the many problems with this dreadful sentence. He also told the Committee that, had he been an MP at the time the sentence was introduced in 2003, he would not have voted for it.

Perhaps.

Despite the “foul stench” of injustice the IPP sentence continues to represent, Raab showed little appetite for the decisive action required. He appeared to reject the Justice Committee’s central recommendation of a resentencing exercise for all those currently subject to an IPP.

Given the government is yet to give its formal response to the Justice Committee report, we must hope that his remarks do not represent a settled position.

Raab also appeared daunted by weight of history. “I am stuck with the legacy of something I didn't vote for,” he said at one point, “but that is the way our system works.”

“So we are stuck with an injustice because it was done in the past?”, the Committee Chair, Sir Bob Neill, replied, leaving Raab thrown and flailing for an answer.

The eleven-minute section of the Committee hearing dealing with IPP (you can watch it on the Centre’s Youtube channel), concluded with a revealing comment by Raab. “I will be responsible, and held responsible, for mistakes that are made in relation to public protection and risk”, he said.

If the government were to accept all the Committee’s recommendations, including on resentencing, Raab will gain plaudits from some quarters as a bold reformer. He also faces political risks, including from unforeseen and unpredictable developments over which he has little or no control.

Put bluntly, when it comes to IPP reform, what’s in it for Raab?

Politics, of course, is a risky business. Politicians have to be prepared to make the big calls, accepting the risks that come with them. If not, they are merely enjoying the trappings of office, without accepting the responsibilities that come with it.

If Raab is not prepared to take the big decisions to address a major injustice, then he should make way for someone who is. Given the current difficulties he is facing from other quarters, the decision may, in any case, be taken out of his hands.

Richard Garside
Director

--oo00oo--

Oh and there's this:-

A whiff of scandal

Last month, we called for the use of electronic monitoring (so-called ‘tagging’) as part of a criminal justice sanction to be based on proper evidence and guided by clear principles. Our call came in response to a report from the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, which painted an alarming picture of government failure and waste.

According to the Committee, nearly £100 million of public funds have been wasted, with the Ministry of Justice still unable to determine if tagging works. Yet the government still plans to press ahead with a £1.2 billion programme, expanding tagging to an additional 10,000 people over the next three years.

Our submission to the Committee was the only written evidence that it published.

Our Research Director, Roger Grimshaw, said, “The whiff of scandal over EM should be a wake-up call for a much more informed and wide-ranging discussion, developing a platform for reform which delimits a place for EM in a modest, humane and purposeful system”.

Read more about it here.

--oo00oo--

Finally, I saw this in the Telegraph:-

Prisoners treated as 'residents' despite demands for no more 'woke' terminology

Prison Service admits the term should not have been used and has since been removed from HMP Moorland in South Yorkshire

Prisoners have been treated as “residents” in jail despite demands by Dominic Raab for staff to stop using “woke” terminology.

HMP Moorland in Doncaster, South Yorkshire, put up a sign directing “residents” or prisoners in the jail to facilities despite an instruction from the Justice Secretary that inmates must no longer be called by such “politically correct” terms.

The language which has also seen offenders called “clients” or “service users” has been part of efforts by prison officials to avoid “labelling” people as offenders in order to help them move on from their lives of crime.

Other prisons have renamed cells as “rooms,” prison blocks as “communities,” holding cells as “waiting rooms” on the basis that deprivation of liberty is sufficient penalty and to help rehabilitate offenders.

Woke terms 'undermine public confidence'

However, guidance issued in April by Mr Raab to prison governors and their staff made clear they should stop using woke terms for offenders because it undermined public confidence that they were being punished for their crimes.

Instead, the Justice Secretary told them that inmates should be called “prisoners” or “offenders” rather than “residents”, “clients” or “service users”. In addition, cells should not be labelled “rooms”, as they are known in two of the newest and largest jails in England and Wales.

On Wednesday the Prison Service admitted the term should not have been used and had been removed.

"We are very clear that this term should not be used and have directed that all communications should follow strict rules. The sign was painted without the knowledge of the prison’s leaders and has been removed,” said a spokesman.

What else is being missed?'

Ian Acheson, a former prison governor and ex-adviser to Government on extremism in jails, said: “HMP Moorland holds high risk high harm sex offenders judged by a recent inspection to be failing to manage them safely.

"I'm told this sign was up for six weeks. If prison 'leaders' which I take to mean senior managers and the governor haven't been visible enough to notice this sign after a month and a half in one of the prison's House Blocks what else is being missed?"

HMP Moorland has also raised eyebrows by putting up a 12-foot high map of the prison on a main walkway, including a “you are here” sign.

“It is a bit contentious when you're locking up people in secure conditions who you're trying to stop escape,” said one insider. “The obvious risks include being able to coordinate drugs being thrown into prison/delivered by drone.”

There was this comment from a reader:-

"Dominic Raab needs to stop using "the public" to justify his every argument when it is clear he is wholly out of touch with what the public actually want. Apart from the ignorant "throw away the key" mob, most people do not want prisoners "punished" as the loss of liberty is quite sufficient.

We want the focus to be on rehabilitation so that the prisoner can be part of society again and benefit from prison time, rather than prison time mean that that person is forever shunned and scorned.

As for Dominic Raab's reaction to the scandal of IPP where prisoners have done years above their tariff often for very minor crimes originally, his response that "he hadn't voted for it" as if that meant there was nothing he could do now, was lame to say the least. He is the justice minister!

Justice is in total decay. It is time MPs woke up to it, because it would appear they are taking no responsibility for it at all and any issues arising are seen as simply too much of a "hot potato" to confront. Sad times, and terrible for so many innocents implicated in something which never happened, because the system in so many ways has gone wrong and there appears to be no accountability whatever."

20 comments:

  1. From Twitter for you Jim.

    What’s the difference between Matt Hancock and Dominic Raab? Hancock looks like a man who wiped out the company pension fund by accident. Raab looks like a man who did it on purpose

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Instead, the Justice Secretary told them that inmates should be called “prisoners” or “offenders” rather than “residents”, “clients” or “service users”.”

    So no more PiPs and PoPs then?

    ReplyDelete
  3. £100 million wasted on tagging with a further £1.2 billion to go down the drain too over the next 3 years, but we can’t give probation offenders bus fares, a coffee or a fiver for a sandwich or a bit of electricity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tagging was flawed from its inception as HDC - I weas working as a seconded probation officer in a London Local prison at the time - it seemed then all they were interested in was getting tagging companies involved and looking tough.

    No one in authority cared about the practical problems or the experiences of prison and probation workers at the front-line.

    What happened to those serious offence reviews regarding the tagging companies- they are still doing public work - it is THE crime, and parliament did not stop it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s probation’s own fault for buddying up with the police and IOM schemes. To much focus on monitoring, control and information gathering. Probation needs to detach from the police and prisons if it wants to reduce crime.

      Delete
    2. No buddying up was involved in bringing us Home Detention Curfew, which was introduced within a couple of years of Tony Blair becoming prime minister.

      Labour was keen to appear as tough as Conservatives who had introduced as to a hastily constructed sex offender registration in their last months in office in 1996/7

      Delete
  5. I think the concept of rehabilitation has become confused with deterrence.
    By putting someone in prison they hope the experience will be enough to make a person not reoffend and risk a return to custody.
    Deterrence therefore equates to the rehabilitation of that person.
    If a person is released from custody homeless, broke with no support and limited access to the services they need, then I personally have no idea how that might equate to someone being described as being rehabilitated.
    I don't really have a problem with prison being a solely punitive experience, a punishment for the offence committed by an individual, but if that's what it is, then those sent to prison must be seen as having "paid their dues" when the sentence ends.
    Punishing people or rehabilitating people are both legitimate arguments in the prevention of reoffending, but they are completely different entities, and they need to stop being confused as one and the same.

    On Rabb, theres an interesting article in the Spectator this week. A bit tongue in cheek in narrative but with quite a serious undertone as to Rabbs character and a generalised observation on the state of our politics and the quality of our MPs.

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-lost-art-of-the-bow-tie/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And in the main deterrents do not work. They may suspend offending for a while or cause crime to be committed in other ways, but for the majority doesn’t stop it.

      Delete
    2. Spot on anon11:26. Its almost as if it not working is by design as lots of offenders could be profitable - think sweated prison labour in the US. Workhouses, like prisons, were also supposed to deter people from poverty, in the days when people thought poverty was a choice, something many still believe. Nowadays, the dwp plays that role - made deliberately bad, and low paid to force workers into poorly paid jobs.

      Delete
    3. And thus we are brought back to Raab's dream dinner date & the lunatic rightwing ramblings of Ayn Rand (aka Alice O'Connor, a Russian-born American writer and philosopher):

      “There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”

      Delete
    4. And that’s where USA sentencing policy the UK likes to follow comes in. People will commit crime so lock them away for as long as possible to halt their criminality. This ethos is why USA has a prison population of 2 million and why the UK is constantly building new prisons.

      Delete
  6. Crime pays.

    For prison builders, tagging companies and the Royal Family that owns land prisons are built on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair I think there's only one now - Dartmoor is owned by the Duchy of Cornwall.

      Delete
    2. And the Tower of London

      Delete
    3. And the probation service anon 18:55, but that doesnt trickle down to the staff.

      Delete

  7. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/25/dominic-raab-inquiry-conduct-expanded-third-complaint

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great reference to ayn rand , look at the ever expanding’civil unrest” legislation/ benefit fraud/ trade union legislation etc social media under musk, we are all at risk of criminogic control /the masses become the enemy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Wikipedia ‘Although her political views are often classified as conservative or libertarian, Rand preferred the term "radical for capitalism". She worked with conservatives on political projects, but disagreed with them over issues such as religion and ethics.’

      Delete
    2. Also from wikipages, As a political term, Tory was an insult (derived from the Middle Irish word tóraidhe, modern Irish tóraí, meaning "outlaw", "robber", from the Irish word tóir, meaning "pursuit" since outlaws were "pursued men") that entered English politics during the Exclusion Bill crisis of 1678–1681.

      And robbing the public purse (or any purse for that matter) is what they do best.

      As for Rand:

      "Rand's writings on her selfishness-oriented philosophy she deemed "Objectivism," have become the backbone of modern conservatism, a pseudo-intellectual rationalization for a reactionary movement that rose up to reject the feminist and antiracist movements of the 20th century... In her purple prose, Rand romanticized the capitalist predator as a handsome, virile man whose towering intellect justifies his massive ego and disregard for the common masses." - Salon.com

      "The real message Rand's works convey is that her protagonists are exempt from the puny standards of law and morality that the common people try to tie them down with" - author Adam Lee

      Delete
  9. https://open.spotify.com/episode/2KUwsYagSjRuNMuuUscC0B?si=ryfhxC1iQ2i53X7Luivpqw Great podcast about ayn rand

    ReplyDelete