Wednesday 3 June 2020

Roadmap to Recovery

Yesterday the government published this:-

PROBATION ROADMAP RECOVERY PHASES 

Current position – Step One

We will continue to operate according to the Exceptional Delivery Models and Plans currently in place, with no major changes of our approach planned at least for the next 2 weeks. This includes: 

• Staff continuing to work from home wherever possible, in recognition of the importance of staff and service user safety. 

• Where staff do need to work from a location which is not their home under the current exceptional delivery arrangements, managers and staff need to ensure that the working environment is a safe one, in line with the government guidance, detailed in Annex B – ‘Working safely during COVID-19 in offices and contact centres’. 

Risk assessments for each location should be maintained to ensure social distancing measures and good hand and respiratory hygiene can be maintained, safe working practice is possible and appropriate equipment is in place to manage COVID related risk. 

The government guidance on office working (annex B) should be followed, summarised below: 

• Ensuring anyone with symptoms leaves the workplace immediately and they and their family self-isolate at home 
• Effective and regular hand washing 
• Reducing the footfall in each location (in line with our exceptional delivery arrangements) 
• Reduce the number of people a person has contact with each day (in line with our exceptional delivery arrangements) 
• Maintaining a 2m distance from one another 
• The suspension of hot-desk and the sharing of desks and equipment 
• The avoidance of sitting face to face especially at close distance 
• Where social distancing at 2m is not possible, staff and service users should wear fluid resistant masks (which we will provide). But we are clear that the best protection for all our staff is effective and regular hand hygiene and to maintain social distancing wherever possible.

Step Two 

We will follow a staged approach to a less “locked down” approach to our work, continuing to prioritise public safety, but gradually increasing what we can do as social distancing constraints change over time. As set out in our principles above, any relaxation of social distancing within probation will come into effect with at least two weeks’ notice (other than in exceptional circumstances), so will happen at least two weeks after the Government’s wider move to “step two”. 

Some of the earlier changes are likely to include:

Scaling back doorstep supervision and scaling up face to face supervision. In order to ensure that social distancing is maintained at Probation Offices it will not be possible to return immediately to face to face supervision for all offenders. The following principles will be used at Local Delivery Unit (LDU) level to develop bespoke recovery plans for face to face supervision: 

Each LDU will need to undertake a capacity analysis that identifies how many offenders are able to report each week in a way that supports continued social distancing. Managers should consider extending office opening times (this will need to include the availability of sufficient staff) and utilising any available estate and partnership buildings (following local agreements and thorough risk assessments). 

Offenders currently receiving doorstep visits are also supervised by audio/ video telephone calls in between doorstep contact. During the initial phase of recovery, the audio/ video calling will continue, with only the doorstep visits being replaced by face to face supervision at a Probation Office. Even with this constraint it is still likely that available capacity will not be able to meet the demand and offenders will therefore need to be prioritised for a return to face to face supervision using the following criteria: 

Category 1 - Very high and high risk of serious harm offenders where there are domestic abuse and/ or child safeguarding concerns 

Category 2 - Other very high and high risk of serious harm offenders 

Category 3 - Medium risk of serious harm offenders where there are domestic abuse and/ or child safeguarding concerns If an LDU is able to accommodate all three categories of offenders and there remains additional capacity, then the prioritisation exercise should be repeated with face to face supervision being offered as a replacement for audio/ video calls. 

Home visits (where a member of staff enters the home of an offender and conducts supervision) will not be possible during this period. As a result, doorstep supervision will remain an important alternative method of risk management for some offenders, particularly those living with their victim or living with children at risk. Doorstep supervision can therefore continue to be utilised in tandem with face to face supervision as part of a risk management plan. 

All changes to supervision and risk management activity will need to be accompanied by a corresponding review of the risk management plan and sentence plan. It is recognised that this will place a significant burden on front-line staff. This activity will be properly benchmarked and resourcing options considered. 

We will ensure that the groups are small in numbers to move slowly and safely away from doorstep supervision and we will conduct a review after one week for each group before we move to the next.

As we would move to increase face to face supervision, in line with the risk assessments we will complete (details can be found in Annex B), we would further consider: 

• Where the social distancing guidelines cannot be followed in full, we will take all mitigating actions possible to reduce the risk of transmission. We will: 

Assess whether protective screens should be fitted in interview rooms and reception areas where required o Consider further changes to office opening hours 

Give staff the option to work alternative hours to minimise footprint in offices o Consider implementing a staff rota for attending the office such as, a one week on one week off system which alternates o Explore changes to our office set up, changing desk layouts and creating a one-way route with one entrance and one exit mapped out 

• Keeping the activity time involved as short as possible – we will ensure staff are only based in the workplace for as long as needed to carry out critical operational delivery. 

• Using back-to-back or side-to-side working (rather than face to face) whenever possible and explore changes to our office set up, changing desk layouts and creating a one-way route with one entrance and one exit mapped out. 

• In our risk assessments we will have particular regard to whether the people doing the work are especially vulnerable to COVID-19 (or live with those who are). All staff are urged to inform line managers of any special circumstances which may mean they or people they live with are particularly vulnerable to the coronavirus, we will conduct individual risk assessments before returns to work and take all reasonable steps to ensure the safety of our staff. 

For anyone considered vulnerable or at a higher risk of impact from COVID19, an individual risk assessment should be completed before returning to an office location. 

• When travelling everybody (including critical workers) should continue to avoid public transport wherever possible. If they can, people should instead choose to cycle, walk or drive (but not sharing a vehicle with those outside their household). If staff do need to take public transport, the Government is now advising that you should aim to wear a homemade cloth face-covering for your journey. 

In line with the guidance, we will display the Government approved notice in all work environments to show we have followed this guidance, confirming that: 
  • We have carried out a COVID-19 risk assessment and shared the results with the people who work here and trade unions 
  • We have cleaning, handwashing and hygiene procedures in line with guidance 
  • We have taken all reasonable steps to help people work from home 
  • We have taken all reasonable steps to maintain a 2m distance in the workplace 
  • Where people cannot be 2m apart, we have done everything practical to manage transmission risk 
This can be found via link 

To support gradual increases in face to face supervision, we also plan to increase flexibility of operating hours for buildings used for face to face contact. This is to allow for greater numbers to be seen over a day without increasing the total number of people on site at any one time, and to reduce the risks involved in rush hour travel. It may also have the knock-on benefit of being desirable for staff with caring responsibilities. 

To be clear, the earlier changes as part of this stage will not include opening more offices wherever possible, we are strongly focused on ensuring the small number of sites we have open are fully safe by completion of full risk assessments detailing that we are adhering Government guidelines (as set out in Annex B). We will explore opening these smaller number of offices for longer hours to minimise staff footfall. We are committed to staff continuing to work from home wherever possible, even if that is only part of the week. 

Other earlier changes as part of step to are likely to include: 

Scaling up court work as needed by increased court activity. The following areas of work will be taken forward across England and Wales: 
  • The NPS will continue to work closely with HMCTS and staff open Courts as required. 
  • The NPS will fully engage with the roll-out of Technology Enabled Justice in order to maximise the potential of remote digital working. 
  • The NPS will feed into the recovery planning work being undertaken by HMCTS. There is a significant backlog of criminal cases across England and Wales which will result in an increased demand for sentencing advice, bail information and the management of community sentences. The HMCTS recovery plan will be used to effectively distribute our resources to meet business need. 
Restarting unpaid work and interventions, initially on a limited scale. This is central to maintaining the confidence of sentencers as well as meeting our broader aims of public protection and reducing reoffending. The following areas of work will be taken forward: 
  • Working with our providers to explore possibilities for commencing unpaid work e.g. singleton placements compatible with social distancing measures. 
  • Working with providers and Intervention Services on options for the delivery of accredited programmes in innovative, socially distance ways. 
  • Identifying and sharing innovations in the area of supervision and rehabilitation that have been effectively delivered during the COVID-19 period. 
It is recognised that there will have been significant development in these areas over recent weeks and that such work has the potential to make probation practice more effective and efficient.

Restarting Programmes – we will consider how we can safely reintroduce delivery of programmes within the NPS, in line with the Government guidance (Annex B), if people must work face to face for a sustained period with more than a small group of fixed partners, then employers need to assess whether the activity can safely go ahead. No one will be obliged to work in an unsafe work environment. 

This will form the basis of our consideration on when we can safely re-introduce programme delivery and group work. We are currently exploring the ability to run programme work on a one-to-one basis or remotely to minimise risk to staff and service users. 

Restarting Offender Management in Custody (OMiC). In liaison with colleagues in prisons, we will look to re-deploy OMiC staff back into prisons when appropriate and in line with Prison regime changes. 

Step Three 

The next step will take place when the Government assessment of risk from COVID-19 warrants further adjustments to the remaining measures. The ambition would be (working in line with the Government COVID-19 Secure guidelines) to: 
  • open remaining offices in a coordinated way and in line with the guidance set out in Annex B 
  • restart Unpaid Work and Interventions on a larger scale 
  • restart face to face training and associated activities 
  • Commence re-opening of Approved Premises (AP) which have been closed due to non COVID-19 reasons 
  • We will start to plan to re-open AP closed due to COVID-19 
  • We propose to maintain single occupancy within AP until Government, Health and other guidance along with data suggests that we can safely move back to double occupancy 
STAFFING 

Through our established daily reporting mechanisms, we will continue to monitor our staffing levels closely to ensure we are able to respond effectively and safely deliver services. 

We will take the following approach, in order of this hierarchy of resourcing options, to move out of the current Exceptional Delivery Models and introduce new service delivery elements. 

1. Existing staff establishments 
2. Staff overtime 
3. Agency staff 
4. Redeployment of other HMPPS staff 
5. Former staff identified as part of the ‘returners work’ 
6. Other Government Department offers/arrangements 
7. Third Sector arrangements 

We will ensure that there is clarity on incremental increases to service delivery, as well as consistency in delivery and decisions on how we will staff the changes, through utilising this hierarchy of options on how we will cover staff availability and/or increases throughout.

As mentioned above, unless in exceptional circumstances, we will give staff at least two weeks’ notice before any significant relaxation of current measures comes into effect, so there is time to prepare and for transparency.

17 comments:

  1. Like lambs to the slaughter, we’re to be herded back into unsafe offices and unsafe working conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ReesMogg & a meekly compliant Tory majority have already voted to return members to the Chamber & remove the ability of absent members to scutinise government business or vote:

    "MPs vote to scrap hybrid voting and continue with 'absurd' queues outside Parliament -

    MPs have voted to scrap digital voting, restricting them only to vote in person in the House of Commons.

    Parliament had allowed MPs to vote online during the coronavirus outbreak, but MPs voted in favour of the Government’s motion to only allow them to vote in person, passing by 261 votes to 163, a majority of 98.

    MPs also defeated an amendment to the motion, which would have restored remote voting in the House of Commons during the Covid-19 pandemic. The motion was defeated by 185 votes to 242, majority 57.

    Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg had insisted the hybrid system should be scrapped because he claimed it diminished the ability for MPs to "scrutinise" legislations.

    Labour MP Margaret Hodge, 75, described the move as "damaging" and said it will "limit accountability and create a toothless Parliament".

    She added: "As somebody in the ‘vulnerable’ category, I am unable to join them. I am furious that for the first time in my 25 years as an MP I am being denied the right to vote!"

    https://www.itv.com/news/2020-06-02/mps-vote-parliament-hybrid-proceedings-physical-only/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So don't be surprised if your MP is not interested in the complaints of probation staff. Don't be surprised when NPS bully & cajole staff to return outwith the 'roadmap' protocols.

      Delete
    2. MPs across the House DID complain, but yesterday's results prove how powerful the Tory majority is when whipped:

      "Boris Johnson is facing a growing revolt by MPs of all parties this weekend against plans to force them back to Westminster on 2 June and vote in person in the House of Commons.

      More than 70 MPs, including most chairs of select committees, have signed a letter complaining that the plans to ditch all remote voting – announced by the Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg – would also lead to queues of more than 650 MPs stretching for over a kilometre around the Palace of Westminster. They say that MPs who are shielding will be unable to vote and will therefore be excluded from the democratic process."

      This ain't no democracy bruv.

      Its a toadocracy, a chumocracy, a cynical exploitation, a bully's charter which will crash through a no-deal Brexit to suit the selfish desires of a tiny handful of power-brokers, driving a coach-and-horses (literally, in ReesMogg's case) through the facade of democracy & ensuring the continued financial enrichment of the 1%.

      And they're smirking all the way to the Bank, laughing in our faces as they exercise their privileges, foment racism and xenophobia, cash in on the sale of public services, travel the world on private transportation while we're all in lockdown, unable to say goodbye, bury our dead or comfort our loved ones.

      #BLM

      Delete
    3. Yes, Black Lives Matter is a relevant issue. The principle of persistently dismissing & ignoring the evident needs of others is particularly enshrined in racism - whether its deaths at the hands of the police, in custody or at the mercy of a virus in the community

      "The health secretary has promised to address the "major" risk minorities groups face from coronavirus after a review showed Black, Asian and Ethnic Minority (BAME) people are up to twice as likely to die from Covid-19. Matt Hancock, leading the government's daily coronavirus press conference, said he was "absolutely determined" to fix the problem, acknowledging race issues which are currently engulfing America. He said the review by Public Health England was a "particularly timely publication, because right across the world, people are angry about racial injustice"."

      "I get that," he added, "Black lives matter."
      _____________________________________________

      How long has the likelihood & nature of this pandemic been known about but suppressed? The tardy & incompetent response to this pandemic & the impact upon the BAME community is just one more example of the institutional racism & general bigotry of the privileged Chumocracy:

      In Feb 2020 the BMJ published an article:

      "The clinical features of covid-19 are well documented, with most people displaying mild symptoms or none at all and deaths occurring mainly in elderly and chronically ill patients. This is not the public perception as played out in the media"

      On 7 April 2020 BMJ published an article that included the observation:

      "In respect of African Americans, a headline, April 3rd, 2020, states, ‘Early Data Shows African Americans Have Contracted and Died of Coronavirus at an Alarming Rate [17] “In Chicago, 70% of COVID-19 Deaths Are Black,”

      For months and months it has been known that BAME communities are more at risk from covid-19.

      On 23 April: "An academic clinician has raised concerns over the lack of recorded data on the number of Covid-19 deaths of people from BAME backgrounds... Dr Manish Pareek, from the University of Leicester, said in the Lancet only 7% of all worldwide reports into Covid-19 deaths recorded ethnicity."

      KingsFund, April 2020: "People from ethnic minority backgrounds constitute 14 per cent of the population but, according to a recent study, account for 34 per cent of critically ill Covid-19 patients and a similar percentage of all Covid-19 cases. These patterns are not unique to the UK – in Chicago, black people constitute 30 per cent of the population but account for 72 per cent of deaths from the virus."

      7 May: "Covid-19 deaths four times more likely among black adults than those of white ethnicity, new ONS analysis suggests"

      2 June: Hancock - "I get that".

      I doubt he gets it. I doubt he even knows what he's talking about. They're just platitudes, soundbites, PR opportunities to cling onto power. He may as well have been brandishing a bible in front of St Margarets.

      "The number of deaths registered in England and Wales with confirmed or suspected Covid-19 reached 44,401 by 22 May, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), but when more recent figures from the NHS and from statistics authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland are added in, the tally hits 50,032."

      50,000 deaths on your cockeyed watch, Mr Hancock.

      #I_Can't_Breathe
      #BLM

      Delete
    4. Do not forget that Hancock lied about testing, smirking on the telly as he fiddled the figures so he could claim he had met his targets. Then, when challenged, the petulant schoolboy had a public tantrum, would NOT accept any other view and stood by his lies.

      The Head of the Statistics Department has written to that child & admonished him. The child still does not accept he was wrong.

      Such an arrogant privileged child will never 'get' the concept of Racism. The minimum requirements are humility, self-awareness and compassion...

      Delete
    5. 2 June 2020 - New Scientist - "The data also shows that black people are between two and three times more likely to be diagnosed with coronavirus than white people, and death rates from covid-19 are highest among people from black and Asian ethnic groups. People of Bangladeshi ethnicity had the highest risk of death of any ethnic group, around twice the risk compared to white people. People of Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, Other Asian, Caribbean and Other Black ethnicity had between a 10 and 50 per cent higher risk than white people."

      Statista on 23 April 2020 - "Until this week the UK had published no information regarding the ethnicity of Covid-19 victims in the country. That has now changed, for England at least, with the NHS now publishing daily demographic breakdowns... we've taken a closer look at the figures and have compared the share of deaths accounted for by ethnic groups to their share of the country's total population.

      While the ethnic group 'Black' makes up 3.5 percent of England's population, as of 17 April it has been identified in 5.8 percent of Covid-19 deaths - 801 people in total. That means the share of deaths is 66 percent higher than the share of the population.

      In contrast, the group 'White', which represents 85.3 percent of the population according to the latest census, has so far made up only 73.6 percent of deaths. In comparison to the Black percentage difference of +66 percent, here we have -14 percent."

      A staggering differential of 80 percentage points.


      Despite all of the evidence we have Bozo still claiming he is "proud" of his government's response & blames Keir Starmer for "endless attacks on public trust".

      ***** U N B E L I E V A B L E *****

      Delete
    6. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=844884699335148&id=155710354774360&sfnsn=scwspwa&extid=lGW8Oirnwp2DCiI0&d=w&vh=e

      Delete
  3. If track and trace is such an essential part of relaxing lockdown restrictions, I'm surprised that it dosen't get a mention when the road to recovery is being spelled out.
    I don't personally see how track and trace can be effectively used within the justice system without bringing it to a total standstill, but I do think that if track and trace is part of the solution, it should form part of the modeling and how its intended to apply.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the Government alert you that you've been in contact with someone who was later found to have Covid and tells you to self isolate...does Probation still pay your wages?

      Delete
    2. No. Statutory Sick Pay. £88 per week.

      Delete
    3. That's not true for NPS. Might be for the CRC's I guess. NPS will be paid special leave if unable to work from home whilst self-isolating without symptoms. If you have symptoms then you should already have started self-isolating. In that case then it's either work from home or sick but again there's a level of enhanced sick pay.

      They've done lots of things wrong but saying things that aren't true to make them look bad weakens the argument for things that are true

      Delete
  4. As usual union is quiet

    ReplyDelete
  5. While Johnson bumbles & burbles his reckless path through his policy of culling the UK population & shouting at Keir Starmer when he runs out of options, his friend over the pond continues to keep the USA entertained with his testosterone fuelled lies:

    "Donald Trump has claimed to have spent only a “tiny” amount of time in a reinforced security bunker under the White House as protesters clashed with Secret Service agents outside and has insisted his time there was for an “inspection”, not his own safety... Kilmeade [FoxNews] asked Trump if, as was reported, the Secret Service had told him he had to “go downstairs” in order to protect his welfare.

    “No, they didn’t tell me that at all,” the president said, “but they said it would be a good time to go down, to take a look, because maybe some time you’re going to need it … I looked, I was down for a very, very short period of time … a whole group of people went with me, as an inspecting factor.”"

    And as for his photo-op at the church: "Trump insisted: “Most religious leaders loved it. I heard [evangelical leader] Franklin Graham this morning thought it was great, I heard many other people think it was great … it was only the other side that didn’t like it.”"

    ReplyDelete
  6. Now we've stopped clapping for carers, the REAL view of the value of care workers is starting to leak out. For example, in Southampton: "Health and social care workers could be asked to volunteer to look after people with Covid-19 without wearing protective equipment in the event of extreme shortages, according to proposals seen by the Guardian... Councils oversee a range of services which require PPE but which are outside the NHS supply chain. These include care homes, pharmacies, mortuary and funeral services, children’s homes and community mental health services. While these services have access to the national PPE stockpile there are sometimes shortages of key items."

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/03/care-home-staff-could-be-asked-to-work-without-ppe-under-council-plan

    Also underlining our institutional values:

    "Concerns about censorship have been raised after third-party submissions were left out of the government-commissioned report on the disproportionate effects of Covid-19 on black, Asian and minority ethnic people

    Public Health England said it had engaged with more than 1,000 people during its inquiry. But the report, criticised for failing to investigate the reasons for the disparities or make recommendations on how to address them, did not mention the consultations.

    Anger has been compounded by a report in the Health Service Journal claiming that prior to publication the government removed a section detailing responses from third parties, many of whom highlighted structural racism.

    Muslim Council of Britain secretary general, Harun Khan, said: “To choose to not discuss the overwhelming role structural racism and inequality has on mortality rates and to disregard the evidence compiled by community organisations, whilst simultaneously providing no recommendations or an action plan, despite this being the central purpose of the review, is entirely unacceptable."

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/03/censorship-row-over-report-on-uk-bame-covid-19-deaths


    Perhaps they should direct their concerns to Matt Hancock who stood up yesterday in The Commons and said "I get that - Black Lives Matter."

    Or maybe he was exercising Parliamentary privilege to talk utter shite with impunity?

    *** Parliamentary privilege grants certain legal immunities for Members of both Houses to allow them to perform their duties without interference from outside of the House. Parliamentary privilege includes freedom of speech and the right of both Houses to regulate their own affairs.

    https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/parliamentary-privilege/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dispatches C4 - a must-see

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting to see Aunty Priti starting to actively distance herself from Bozo & the Tory faithful, holding fast on the quarantine policy & stating it would be "futile to throw away what we have all sacrificed & a testament to those who have died".

    I smell ambition. Aunty can see Bozo on the ropes over the shambolic covid-19 response & she's manoeuvreing to get her bid for succession in early, garnering public sympathy so she can say she was not complicit in the Bozo policies. Also note she has chaired just two (?I think this is right?) coronavirus briefings...

    ReplyDelete