Monday 22 June 2020

Read All About It!

Just as the recent big probation story broke, I saw this in the Guardian about Durham coal-miner's daughter to top White House aid Fiona Hill and have wanted to find an excuse to quote it ever since:- 

When we talked in May, Hill was back in seclusion but so was the rest of Washington. She was speaking from home, where she had an array of books spread around her feet. She had laid them out to try to piece together an explanation of why the three countries with which she was intimately familiar – the UK, where she was born; Russia, the country she had spent her life studying; and the US, where she has lived since 1989 and risen to the highest level of government – had all failed so spectacularly in handling the health crisis.

She is one of a handful of people to have stood at the nexus of these three disastrous governments, to have been in the room to witness Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Boris Johnson operate. “It’s a story really about how the US, UK and Russia have all ended up in the same spot weirdly, not just in terms of Covid-19 but also populist politics and many of the same out-of-control inequalities,” Hill said.

In her view populist governments are useless at handling complex problems of governance, almost by definition. If leaders are fit to govern, they generally don’t need populism to get elected.

“It’s all about style and swagger and atmospherics, with superficial solutions to things, with lots of sloganeering, and obviously dealing with a pandemic is pretty methodical and boring. It requires an awful lot of planning and logistical organization and you can’t just sort of do it on the fly with an ad hoc coalition.”

What interests Hill is how the three such different countries end up in the same boat, run by populists and significantly less able to cope with a pandemic than their neighbours. She believes the critical common factor is the heady rise, and then the catastrophic collapse, of heavy industry and the failure of their governments to manage the fall and cushion the impact on their people.


--oo00oo--
It's a very strange world isn't it when 'populist politics' gives you dreadful leaders who actually aren't that popular. The penny has already dropped with Putin and Boris, whilst with Trump it's obviously going to take a little longer as he finds some way to rationalise the suggested Tulsa million with the actual 6,200 quoted by the local Fire Department. Apparently hundreds of disgruntled teenagers used TikToc to rain on his parade by requesting thousands of tickets, but with no intention of showing up. What pesky liberal losers and lowlife's! 

The secret of this 'populism' is of course media manipulation and it's something we should all pay close attention to, posing as it does a serious threat to our democratic processes. In the middle of a national crisis, how is it that our government can get away with a boycott of BBC Newsnight and Channel 4 News? Of course both are public service broadcasters with legal obligations regarding 'balance' and impartiality, but alarmingly each is under serious threat from a Tory government seeking retribution for daring to hold it to account. Boris Johnson has threatened to sell Ch4 and the BBC faces numerous threats to its finances with forced funding of the World Service, free licences for the over 75's, decriminalisation of licence fee avoidance and financing of local democracy reporters. It will be interesting to see how the new Director General (a former Tory) will handle probably the most serious threat in the BBC's history. 

The virus lockdown has given many, including myself, the opportunity of sampling Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain and to be frank it's been a revelation! An irritating twat from memory, his routine lambasting of government and mediocre ministers has earned him a total boycott for weeks which he proudly confirms has turbo-charged his viewing figures. But it's more than that, his championing of issues such as Grenfell, Windrush, Covid-19, NHS, Dominic Cummings and more recently the tragic death of George Floyd and Black Lives Matter has been fearless, forensic and utterly unapologetic - in short a revelation. To be honest it's caused me to reconsider the whole issue of so-called 'balance'. If you think the government is lying or a minister is useless - say so!

On the issue of 'balance', I see Twitter have finally lost patience with professional troll Katie Hopkins and said they have permanently banned her and of course LBC similarly decided to ditch the dreadful Nigel Farage. With Facebook and Twitter deciding to clip Trump's wings and even Sky trying to rein-in the likes of Adam Boulton, we seem to be in very interesting times indeed on the media front. Watch this space as they say.    

24 comments:

  1. Coukd I suggest an edit in the above text so it reads 'George Floyd'?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I watched BBC 2 last night 'Thatcher; A Very British Revolution' a five part series shown at 7pm each evening all this week.
    I was struck by two things.
    Firstly, I was very surprised at how my repulsion for the woman had faded. I well remember the Thatcher years, and I saw her (still do) as a syncopath with no emotion and a
    perverse veiw of empire. Inequality is a right she refused to give up, and she did her best to make the divide between those that have and those that don't as wide as possible.
    Secondly, I got got thinking that the likes of Cameron and Osborne, would have been about whilst Thatcher reigned, but their real understanding of her would have been formed, not through their experience of living through her premiership, but through the economic, political and history books they read at Eton. They read 'presented' theories and ideologies, but missed the practical, partly through age, but partly through privilege aswell. It's little wonder then that they brought us austerity, savage cuts to public services and shrunk the state so much with little regard of the consequences for many. Being superior dosen't work without inequality.
    Popularist politics makes for a very dangerous and unstable world. Trumps advert that was removed last week was truly horrific. Standing against a back drop of 'One Nation' and an outstretched arm in a Nazi salute. He was careful to just curl his finger tips enough to make an argument against the image he knew he was portraying, but it was very clear what he was trying to project.
    I can't stand Piers Morgan, and I'm sure the position he's taken up on Good Morning is all about advancing his own 'brand' and popularity, but I do wish more political commentators would take a lead from him and 'call it out' whenever they find it. The media after all shouldn't be used as a buffer between political decisions and public perception.

    Those of a more youthful age that are perhaps a little more familiar with Katie Hopkins then Margaret Thatcher should watch the BBC 2 series. There's a lot of similarities between them.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wiki tells us "Tim Davie stood as a councillor for the Conservative Party in Hammersmith in 1993 and 1994 and was deputy chairman of the Hammersmith and Fulham Conservative party in the 1990s. Davie is Chairman of Comic Relief, Trustee of the Tate and the Royal Television Society, and in 2018 was appointed as Chairman of the Creative Industries Council"

    Influential fingers in lots of pies. And apparently he's taken a £75k pay cut for the privilege, now only getting £525,000, but will only be paid £450,000 for the first year. The sacrifices some people make is inspirational!

    ReplyDelete
  4. ONS - "A decline in coronavirus (COVID-19) infection rates in England appears to be slowing down... with an estimated average of 33,000 within the community (private households) having COVID-19 between 31 May and 13 June 2020"

    That's a reduction on the estimated 149,000 average April/May, but now appears to be a steady state. Perhaps its becoming the default position for the virus in post-pandemic UK?

    HMG figures show 8,300 new cases were reported last week.

    Can't find any updated info about prison related infections/deaths, or probation related infections/deaths. I find it hard to believe there havent been any... and with the shock failure of HMG's world-beating testing system there's hardly any data of value emerging.

    The Govt must be 'flying blind'? Or they're not telling what they know?

    ReplyDelete
  5. June Updates from HMPPS website:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/891752/Update_to_the_Draft_Target_Operating_Model_for_Probation_Services_in_England_and_Wales.pdf

    "This document accompanies the announcement in June 2020 of changes to the Government’s plans for probation reform to reflect the impact of COVID-19. It outlines where proposals contained in thedraft Target Operating Model,published in March this year, will need to change to reflect the revised approach.... Our ambitions for the reforms have not changed from those outlined in the draft Target Operating Model"

    "there will be a transition period to the new model to embed the changes following implementation in June 2021 (Day 1). We are taking a ‘lift and shift’ approach to the transfer of CRC arrangements as far as possible to minimise any further disruption caused by COVID-19 and to secure services for Day 1."

    "We will no longer be appointing Probation Delivery Partners and definable interventions at scale will be delivered by the NPS following the end of current CRC contracts in June 2021."

    "Longer-term, the Dynamic Framework will remain as a means for Regional Probation Directors to call off a wider range of rehabilitative and resettlement services to respond to local need."

    "We expect that CRC staff who deliver Unpaid Work, Accredited Programmes and Rehabilitation Activity Requirements in the three need areas which will become Structured Interventions will be assigned to transfer to the NPS, which will mean many more staff coming into the NPS than under the previous model. There will be some staff in mixed roles which are part Sentence Management and part interventions where decisions on role allocation will need to be made."

    "Further work is required to determineroles and structureswithin thesebut we anticipate that there will be a new regional senior leadership role to oversee teams focused on Unpaid Work and Interventions."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who'd have thought it!?!

    "According to Chris Ryan, the author of 'Civilized to Death: the price of progress', rich people have the tendency to distance themselves from people because of their wealth differential."
    https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p07vts5j/the-surprising-psychology-behind-being-rich

    So its not the stench of the great unwashed after all, its just the 'wealth differential'.


    And here we see Trump supporters are making their views known the only way they know how:

    US-based motor-racing organisation Nascar says it is investigating after a noose was found in the garage stall of African-American driver Bubba Wallace.

    Wallace, Nascar's only full-time black driver, successfully campaigned to get the Confederate flag banned from races.

    The flag has been a common sight at Nascar circuits but for many it remains a symbol of slavery and racism.

    In a statement, Nascar condemned the "heinous" act at Talladega Superspeedway in Alabama.

    "Late this afternoon, Nascar was made aware that a noose was found in the garage stall of the 43 team," the organisation said.

    Wallace had called for the flag to be banned from racetracks where it had become a common sight, particularly in the sport's southern US heartland.

    "Get them out of here. They have no place for them, " he told CNN. "No one should feel uncomfortable when they come to a Nascar race. It starts with Confederate flags."

    However, before Sunday's scheduled racing at Talladega, a small plane flew over the track trailing a Confederate flag and a banner that read "Defund Nascar".

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just listening to The Digital Human, R4 - fascinating stuff as they expose the various means by which digital toes are being dipped into the ideological, political & intellectual waters of national populations:

    "Aleks Krotoski explores how the mechanics of the digital environment allow misinformation to swamp digital platforms.

    Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, they are all swamped with cheery, colourful ‘life hack’ and crafting videos, but if you watch for more than a few minutes you’ll see that actually trying to follow along would prove difficult, if not impossible. Much of the content isn’t even possible to do. And yet, it’s extraordinarily popular, and profitable content.

    Clickbait isn’t new, but this is potentially dangerous eye candy, and when you look beneath the surface, it’s possible to see that the same infrastructure and techniques have made life hacks go viral, can, in the wrong hands, be exploited for deliberately malicious ends.

    It only takes a few minutes to set up a system that can swamp the internet. Be it with unintentionally dangerous DIY suggestions aimed at children, or deliberate political machinations targeted at adults."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well that's that whole issue reliably researched then.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "A small plane trailing the words 'White Lives Matter Burnley' flew over the pitch shortly after kick-off at the Etihad Stadium, in an act later described by Fare – the European equality body – as part of a wider "racist backlash"."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Do 'Fare' know much about who is responsible, what motivated them, or the wider experience of Burnley's underclass over the past 40 years or so. Possibly not. Whilst this was a grossly misjudged act, and fortunately likely to further the BLM cause, I can't help but think that Burnley FC's (no doubt well-intended) statement is somewhat over the top and misguided too. The slogan was predictable and sad, but it wasn't deeply offensive. Doesn't help anyone to completely lose track of all perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "However, before Sunday's scheduled racing at Talladega, a small plane flew over the track trailing a Confederate flag"

    Another 'grossly misjudged act' that 'wasn't deeply offensive'?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Who knows? But not an illegal act. Not worthy of condemnation in the very strongest terms. Not in need of a thorough police investigation. Where does the law go from here? How do authorities then respond to racist acts that are actually 'deeply offensive'? We inflate our sense of outrage at our own peril. And what reaction might be expected to an overly authoritarian clampdown which seeks to re-interpret laws to suit the zeitgeist. Its clearly important to convey disapproval, and many will want to jump on board with their 'outrage', but the purpose will not be best served by an over-reaction to every distasteful or misjudged act.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Its an overt racist statement, an intentional act of racism.

    Are we now arguing over how nuanced racism can be, how much racism can we take before we are outraged?

    a banner says "White Lives Matter"?

    a confederate flag is flown?

    a noose left in a black NASCAR driver's garage?

    a body swinging in the breeze?

    "But not an illegal act" - Do you work in a probation environment?

    "There are two main types of racist and religious hate crime:

    - racially or religiously aggravated offences under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998

    - any other offences for which the sentence can be increased under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 if they are classed as a hate crime"

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/indepth/opinion/british-invented-racism-americans-perfected-200618164254147.html

    ReplyDelete
  15. Where was your outrage 3 weeks ago, or 3 months, or 3 years ago? Has your threshold for outage fallen subject to nuance too? Of course there is nuance in criminal law. That's in large part the environment in which legal advocates operate (do you work in a Probation environment?). A month ago the events of last night would not have been illegal - at least not in terms of the words on the banner. Now they are not just illegal, but utterly reprehensible. You appear to be trying to equate it with 'lynching' which is ludicrous and emphasises my point about perspective. People who post St George flags in their front windows when there are no international sporting events on telly are likely to have far-right leanings, yes. We know that, and we respond accordingly. Some would consider it an overtly racist statement. But we don't kick the door down and drag them into court, because they haven't broken the law. I wonder if you would so quickly write off a Service User on the cusp of being drawn in to more dangerous far-right thinking or actions. It doesn't help.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Has your threshold for outage fallen subject to nuance too?"

    Been at the butt end of racism in England every day of my life. The English excel in the way they adjust their racism to suit the 'target' and the occasion. Which results in their 'target' being variously ignored; excluded; having views dismissed; being explicitly humiliated; being called a range of 'amusing' names (our PM prefers picanninny - ha ha, how delightfully funny); being spat at; being physically assaulted; and so very many other creative, malicious, discriminatory tactics.

    Believe it or not one doesn't have to be "on the cusp of being drawn in to more dangerous far-right thinking or actions" to be a racist, to commit acts of racism or to demonstrate one's discriminatory views.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Of course one doesn't. But that's a very different point to the one you were originally taking issue with. Which I assume you must be well aware of given that you've steered the debate to where you have.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "that's a very different point to the one you were originally taking issue with."

    You assume the replies to your comments are from one person. Why? This is a well-visited public blogspace.

    The point being made from the start was about racism. How has anyone "steered the debate" away from racism?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think you're also assuming all comments were from one person...but whats your
    point in raising that exactly? Is there one? (I suppose its possible that every contributor to this site opens their post with inverted commas and proceeds with a similar testy tone). Do we assume that as long as the topic remains broadly related to racism, there is no danger of it losing focus or being railroaded? Nice one.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Trump is a master of the art of racist rhetoric, deflecting questions, dodging criticism & turning everything on its head:

    "In Phoenix, Trump hailed “patriotic young Americans who stand up tall for America and refuse to kneel to the radical left”.

    He said: “You are the courageous warriors standing in the way of what they want to do and their goals.

    “They hate our history. They hate our values, and they hate everything we prize as Americans.” "

    https://www.thejournal.ie/donald-trump-phoenix-rally-5131117-Jun2020/

    In Phoenix last night Trump referred to coronavirus as the "kung-flu". That's the President of the United States using racist language in his election rally to an audience comprising, mostly, young students. They cheered.

    Racism ***is*** the topic. It is the issue.

    The banner over the Etihad was just one more part of the process. It was not a "grossly misjudged act" - it was an intentional act. Like Trump's words were intentional, e.g. "refuse to kneel to the radical left".

    ReplyDelete
  21. It was not, however, an illegal act. That was the point made repeatedly above and one which you seem very eager to cloud. The police took far too long to conclude this due to current heigtened sensitivity, although it was perfectly obvious from the outset. The criminal law was in danger of a sudden reinterpretation because of the mood of the moment, and that is patently wrong. I noted also that another example cited above as a frightening racially motivated threat (The NASCAR 'noose') turned out to be an old rope used for many months as a makeshift door handle, but was ramped up into a 'lynching' reference without pause for thought or evidence because it fitted a narrative. I haven't heard anybody on this site try to argue that racism doesn't overshadow many areas of our lives, or that it would be difficult to find overt examples of this, so it probably serves little purpose to keep coming back here with other examples you've found. But if we are to lose all perspective, and equate every incident as the most heinous of crimes, then it seems likely to polarise existing divisions. I wasn't going make anything of it at the time, but the casual generalisation made above yesterday ("The English excel in the way they adjust their racism to suit the 'target'"), is perhaps one symptom of that..?

    ReplyDelete
  22. This:

    [Bernie] Ecclestone said he "didn't know" [Lewis] Hamilton had been subjected to racism and that he had "never needed" to discuss it with him, adding: "I'm surprised that it concerns him even."

    ReplyDelete
  23. 76 hours of trawling the internet to find an article unrelated to this thread. Racism exists. It is an insidious amd pervading social ill. Therefore you're right about everything... however inaccurate, random or reductive your train of thought. Must be good to know you're contributing to the common good.

    ReplyDelete