Friday 2 November 2018

More HMI Reports

Two HMI reports were published yesterday, and here we have the press release on West Yorkshire CRC;-

West Yorkshire CRC - weaknesses needing improvement but motivated leaders and staff eager to learn

Staff in West Yorkshire Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) were found by inspectors to be well led and striving to do well but they struggled with heavy caseloads, ICT and infrastructure problems beyond their control, and some gaps in skills.

The weaknesses at the CRC, which supervised 8,136 medium and low risk offenders at the time of the inspection in July 2018, led HM Inspectorate of Probation to rate it overall as “Requiring Improvement.”

Aspects of its case supervision were assessed as inadequate. A key weakness was found in work to reduce the risk of harm to potential victims from those under supervision. Inspectors noted instances where, in domestic abuse cases, some staff members failed to identify the potential risks posed to children.

Dame Glenys Stacey, HM Chief Inspector of Probation, publishing a report on the inspection, said: “A key area of practice that requires prompt improvement is managing risk of harm. Case planning in general is not sufficiently robust and reviews of work need to be improved across the board.”

However, despite noting some poor assessments, Dame Glenys also concluded the leadership of the CRC, part of a consortium of CRCs led by Interserve, was eager to learn and improve as it faced some major challenges:
  • Leaders and staff had done much to develop their organisation, “in straitened circumstances, but more needs to be done to improve service delivery.” The report noted: “Staff and managers are passionate about providing quality services but many report being overwhelmed by workload pressures and being weary of organisational change.”
  • Much of the CRC’s operating model is embedded but some key aspects (such as the organisation’s estate strategy and information and communication technology strategy) are not fully implemented. These compound the already demanding workload pressures on staff. The report noted that for full implementation to be achieved, the Ministry of Justice must promptly ensure that Interserve can use the Strategic Partner Gateway, or a suitable alternative, that will enable the various systems to work together.
  • Some case managers have gaps in their knowledge and skills, and this limits their ability to deliver good-quality, personalised services. The management has begun to address these deficiencies.
Among positive findings, Dame Glenys noted that partnership working was strong. Specialist services, such as services for women, were in place and Through the Gate work with those leaving prison, as well as supervision of unpaid work imposed by courts, showed promise.

Overall, Dame Glenys said:

“This CRC’s senior leaders understand the challenges faced by the organisation. They promote a culture of learning from mistakes and they actively respond to findings from audits and independent inspection. Consequently, we expect that the findings and recommendations in this report will assist their efforts to address practice shortfalls and improve the quality of the services provided.”

--oo00oo--

The second is the result of the first new-style of inspection report and perhaps those of a cynical disposition would not be surprised that overall it's quite positive. Having said that, it confirms how TR has created staff shortages everywhere - and we tragically know what the consequences of that can be - and there's a marked unwillingness to use the services of the local CRC and the infamous 'rate card'. 

South West South Central division - good performance overall despite staff shortages

The South West South Central division of the National Probation Service, supervising nearly 13,000 offenders from Berkshire to Cornwall, was found by inspectors to be performing to a good standard overall.

In the first report in new programme of inspections of the NPS divisions, Dame Glenys Stacey, HM Chief Inspector of Probation, said the division was effectively led with robust systems to monitor performance.

However, publishing the first report in new programme of inspections of the National Probation Service (NPS) divisions, Dame Glenys said that a shortage of staff was having an impact on the division.

“The number of probation staff has fallen short of the target since 2015; at the same time the National Probation Service workload has increased. The division has a clear delivery plan to address staff shortfalls, but this had not yet had the necessary impact and, as a result, caseloads in some parts of the division remained high.” The report noted that the problems were most acute in the part of the division bordering London, where vacancies remained unfilled despite the offer of higher salaries.

Inspectors found the division has recently focused on the quality of its assessments of individuals, reflecting the principle that establishing and maintaining a professional relationship with those who are supervised is at the heart of all probation work.

Dame Glenys added: “We found outstanding results in this aspect of its work. The planning of supervision was good, and focused on reducing reoffending and keeping others safe.” Inspectors noted, though, that “contingency plans”, spelling out how to respond to any heightened risk of harm to others, should have been more robust.

The division provided sufficient information to courts to assist in sentencing and a good service to victims who had opted into the victim contact scheme.

There were, however, some shortcomings. The delivery of supervision did not focus enough on addressing factors related to offending, and not enough attention was paid to keeping individuals’ progress under review. Some interventions were working well but the division was not making full use of all services provided by the Community Rehabilitation Companies in its areas.

Overall, Dame Glenys said:

“This division is performing to a good standard overall. I hope that our findings and recommendations enable it to do better still, although we see that, in some matters, improvement is dependent on centrally driven policies and support.”

10 comments:

  1. And in other news ...

    Kerri McAuley murder: Joe Storey risk 'not recognised'

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-46060727

    “At the time of Miss McAuley's death the probation service was "significantly under-resourced", the National Probation Service eastern division director Steven Johnson-Proctor said.

    His probation officer had nearly double the expected workload, and the service tried to balance the court-imposed rehabilitation order with Storey's employment and "got that wrong", Mr Johnson-Proctor said.”

    ........

    No Steve ... YOU got it wrong !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The risks posed by a "sadistic" killer were "not fully recognised" before he battered his ex-girlfriend to death, a report said.

      Joe Storey, 27 murdered Kerri McAuley, 32, at her Norwich flat in January 2017 and then took a "blood-smeared selfie". He was jailed for life.

      The report said Storey was 18 when a probation officer said he "has the potential to inflict fatal harm".

      The review panel said he evaded "the level of monitoring that he deserved".

      Storey killed mother-of-two Miss McAuley by numerous punches to the head, effectively smashing every bone in her face.

      In sentencing, the judge said it was "one of the worst cases of domestic violence that have come before the courts".

      Two years before he killed Miss McAuley, Storey was also sentenced to a two-year community order, with a supervision requirement and completion of rehabilitation, after assaulting a previous girlfriend.

      But his rehabilitation course kept being pushed back by the probation service, the Domestic Homicide Review Report revealed.

      The report by the Norfolk County Community Safety Partnership (NCCSP) - which does not name the perpetrator or his victim - looked at how the police, probation, the Crown Prosecution Service and social services acted before the killing.

      Storey's domestic abuse began at the age of 14 and he had a string of convictions relating to five previous partners.

      He was subject to two restraining orders relating to two previous girlfriends, and was given a further order in September 2016 for an attack on Miss McAuley.

      He had been due to stand trial for the assault but the case was dropped when Miss McAuley would not give evidence. The report said an adjournment would have allowed police to find out the reasons why she changed her mind.

      The report found "rehabilitation with this man simply didn't work", with the NCCSP unable to unearth any evidence of rehabilitation during his three spells in prison.

      At the time of Miss McAuley's death the probation service was "significantly under-resourced", the National Probation Service eastern division director Steven Johnson-Proctor said.

      His probation officer had nearly double the expected workload, and the service tried to balance the court-imposed rehabilitation order with Storey's employment and "got that wrong", Mr Johnson-Proctor said.

      He said the service had since recruited 20 trainee probation officers in Norfolk and Suffolk but was "still 18% under-resourced".

      Among its 32 recommendations the NCCSP asked the Ministry of Justice to look at longer prison sentences for repeat violent offenders, with mandatory rehabilitation while in prison, and the adequacy of staffing in the National Probation Service.

      Delete
    2. http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/mappa-registered-sex-and-violent-criminals-living-in-suffolk-1-5759091

      Delete
  2. All of the HMI reports are interesting & clearly thorough in their groundwork but there are too many excuses being made for consistent failure.

    Let's not forget its OVER THREE & A HALF YEARS since the new owners took charge of the CRCs - 1 Feb 2015 - and not one of them is working as they should.

    Also do not forget that the CRCs were originally brought into existence in December 2013 as nominal shell companies in advance (with Andrew Emmett at 102 Petty France as Finance & Analysis Director; he is also currently holding five more shell companies, CONEW1, CONEW2 CONEW3 & CONEW4 + GOV FACILITY SERVICES LIMITED [11061429] - wonder what they'll be used for?). Grayling & a motley collection of MoJ/NOMS staff had control of the CRCs via the 'golden share' from June 2014 until Feb 2015. Do they not have some responsibility for the pisspoor state of the companies they mismanaged then sold?

    Anyhow, three and a half years later & not one of the CRCs is functioning as an effective business:

    * infrastructure problems beyond their control
    * gaps in skills.
    * more needs to be done to improve service delivery
    * overwhelmed by workload pressures and weary of organisational change
    * key aspects are not fully implemented
    * case managers have gaps in their knowledge and skills

    When will the lies, deceit, sleight-of-hand & theft of public funds be addressed? Why do ordinary tax-paying folk have to lose jobs, lives. families, homes, etc just because a tiny handful of self-important greedy incompetents want to line their own pockets & feel good about themselves?

    And why won't HMI Probation GET OFF THE FENCE & call out the bullshit for what it is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. THE WARWICKSHIRE AND WEST MERCIA COMMUNITY REHABILITATION COMPANY LIMITED - Company number 08802535

    1 active person with significant control / 0 active statements

    Eos Works Limited - Active

    Correspondence address - 19-20 The Triangle, The Triangle, Nottingham, England, NG2 1AE

    Notified on - 6 April 2016

    Governing law - Companies Act 2006

    Legal form - Private Limited Company

    Place registered - Registrar Of Companies (England And Wales)

    Registration number - 6601702

    Nature of control
    Ownership of shares – 75% or more
    Ownership of voting rights - 75% or more
    Right to appoint and remove directors


    EOS WORKS LIMITED - Company number 06601702

    Registered office address - Staffline Group Plc, 19-20 The Triangle, Ng2 Business Park, Nottingham, NG2 1AE

    Company status - Active

    Company type - Private limited Company

    Incorporated on - 23 May 2008

    Nature of business (SIC) - 99999 - Dormant Company

    The Directors of Eos Works Limited filed a report for the year ended 31 Dec 2017 stating that the company has been dormant since 1 Jan 2016 & that the directors have no plans for the company to be trading in the foreseeable future.

    So how does it work that a dormant company with two directors is the sole active person with significant control of the CRC?

    NB: The two directors of the dormant EOS Works Limited are C Pullen & M Watts.

    * Christopher Pullen is listed as the CRC's Chief Financial Officer who resigned on 15 Feb 2018

    * Michael Watts is listed as the CRC's Chief Financial Officer appointed on 15 Feb 2018.

    Answers on a postcard please...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 6 Apr 2016 - which Home Sec would that have been? Gove? Truss?

      Delete
    2. It would have been Gove as JUSTICE secretary; Truss didn't arrive on the scene until July'16

      Delete
  4. Howard League today:-

    The Chief Inspector of Probation has just published the first in a series of inspections she is carrying out on the National Probation Service.

    The South West South Central division of the National Probation Service, supervising almost 13,000 people from Berkshire to Cornwall, was found by inspectors to be performing to a good standard overall and was effectively led with robust systems to monitor performance.

    Contrast this with a series of damning inspection reports on the privatised community rehabilitation companies (CRCs). I only pick out the most recent but not a single inspection since the split in the service has praised any of the private companies for doing a good job.

    West Yorkshire – run by Purple Futures, an Interserve company – struggled with heavy caseloads, ICT and infrastructure problems, and gaps in skills. The inspection said that weaknesses at the CRC, which supervised 8,136 low- and medium-risk offenders, led to an overall rating as “Requiring Improvement”.

    Sodexo-run Essex CRC was also rated as “Requiring Improvement”. There was a lack of focus on the understanding, identification and management of risk of harm to the public. In a third of the cases there were concerns about domestic abuse and the same proportion of cases had child safeguarding concerns. Inspectors recommended managers take steps “as a matter of urgency” to ensure that people on probation do not cause serious harm to others. Essex CRC’s method of supervising people on probation by telephone also came in for criticism.

    Another Interserve-run service in Merseyside, which supervises more than 6,500 low- and medium-risk offenders, was found by inspectors to need to improve its work on public protection. Inspectors found domestic abuse and safeguarding checks were often seen as administrative tasks, rather than crucial work to keep people safe. Opportunities to identify and assess risks were sometimes missed, for example when people on probation started new relationships or moved in with partners who have children.

    A few months ago, inspectors looked at whether the promised engagement with the skilled voluntary sector had materialised. It hadn’t.

    Probation reforms have failed to deliver the aim of ensuring that voluntary and third-sector organisations play a central role in providing specialist support to offenders, according to the Chief Inspector. She said that there was a “bleak and exasperating” picture.

    Clearly this mess needs sorting out. The Howard League brought together a group of academics who have been working on desistance and researching probation with Ministry of Justice officials. Changes are afoot and we thought it a good idea to use evidence on what works to influence what happens to probation.

    It is good news that probation in Wales will be brought back into a unified public service, but the proposal to decrease the number of community rehabilitation contracts from 21 to 10 in England retains the split between private and public, which is the central flaw corrupting the whole edifice.

    The rump of the National Probation Service is struggling but is at least providing a decent service in an effort to keep the public safe. The same cannot be true of the private CRCs, and they should just be dumped into the bin of history.

    Now that the government has decided to end the contracts of the CRCs early, the next easy step would be to reintegrate the two wings into a public service. That would be one last restructuring that staff would welcome.

    Frances Crook

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, Ms Crook, I suspect the convoluted financial & organisational shenanigans of the various CRCs will make that marriage impossible. Any changes of ownership are supposed to be impossible without the approval of the Justice Sec, but I doubt the financiers have paid any heed to that directive. They have plenty of experience of & resource for hiding, sliding or otherwise moving business to avoid financial liabilities, e.g. Tax, contract penalties, etc.

      The WWM example above doesn't even mention PeoplePlus or the complex relationships with Staffline Group & its many constituent parts. And that's just WWM.

      Rich business people & their accountants control this government & the social agenda. Ian DuncanSmith has been determined to eradicate 'the underclass' by starving them to death via UC but is now trying to become the peoples' hero over fobt; Jeremy Wright is trying to protect gambling industry interests at the expense of human life; and Aaron'Banks is being investigated re-Leave & allegedly trying to usurp democratic electoral procedures, & has been openly assisted in this over the years by various senior government figures. Even today this most serious matter is being obfuscated by the damage-limitation strategies of senior politicians.

      The genie is out of the bottle. I can only foresee further, vast sums of public funds disappearing into private pockets.

      Delete
  5. Does anyone remember when every Probation trust was good or excellent (not wholly convinced that was true but nonetheless). I love the language of current inspection reports. Cannot remember which CRC but the report said that things had improved to an average for CRCs which in itself was unacceptable (something like that). The reports keep coming and coming and coming and all of a similar ilk. You gotta hand it to the powerful and their vested interests, they certainly know the art of of survival or in the case of TR2 reincarnation. Frances Crook speaks for the majority in Probation when he calls for a reunified public sector service.

    ReplyDelete