Thursday, 11 August 2011

Chickens return to Roost

One positive aspect of the recent public disorder and looting is that the whole issue of the underclass and disaffected youth is getting a thorough airing. Ok there is a degree of unhelpful heat being generated - I thought personified perfectly by Kelvin Mackenzie's astonishing outburst on Newsnight recently - but also a genuine thirst to try and understand how we've arrived at this particular point and more importantly what we can do about it. Pretty much it's the only topic of conversation in the pub and probably the Clapham omnibus too. 

The reasons are complex and there are certainly no quick fixes, despite what some emerging 'experts' have been saying in the media over recent days. What I'm clear about though is that the seeds of our present problems were sown some time ago and have coincided with the fundamental change in ethos and operation of the probation service. I always used to say to friends and interested parties that one great strength of the Service was that it was embedded in communities and had unrivalled knowledge concerning what was going on.

Probation officers always got to know pretty quickly what aspects of social policy were and were not working. The Service had the flexibility to respond to perceived need and gaps in service provision and innovation was actively encouraged by management. I used to think that a wise government listened to what we were saying and trusted us to respond in appropriate ways that addressed social problems that led to offending. I thought I knew what our role was as a specialist part of a broad Welfare State, dedicated to improving society and individual people's lives that had been damaged in a variety of ways. I thought I knew and clung resolutely to this concept for as long as possible as successive governments rode roughshod over my beloved career. 

Lets be clear about what happened. We allowed politicians to get involved. They hijacked the debate about various social issues and imposed upon us the usual 'quick fix' simplistic supposed answers to complex problems for political gain. Whether it was 'short sharp shocks' or ASBO's or any number of other failed 'sound bite' solutions, the fact is that politicians emasculated and disabled a fine public service with years of experience in tackling the root causes of the behaviour we are now experiencing. I have no doubt at all that we would not be in the position we are now if the Probation Service today had the same freedom of operation it had when I first joined over 25 years ago. We used to be an agent of change. Now we're just a victim of it. Damn you Jack Straw, Michael Howard and all your ilk!         

3 comments:

  1. Jim,

    Spot -on..you could be forgiven for believing that the PS was an invisibly ' benign' presence in local communities given the abscence of any national voice or leadership( outside of Napo) offering calm & insightful reflection on the urban riots and visions as to ways of healing 'broken' communities.. ( maybe the JSC said it all!)
    One of the interesting differences between the urban riots of the Thatcher era and the riots today has been the fractured & toxic r/ship between Police & Government ( notwithstanding the hostility to welfarism apparent in both eras) with Police Forces facing stringent cuts & the prospects of locally elected Crime & Police Commissioners in 2012.. it looks like a rtn to law & order populism based on talking up increased fear & insecurity...it will be interesting to hear if PS is mentioned once today in the HoC debate?..good article on Police/Government in Guardian

    Regards

    Mike

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/09/david-cameron-police-riots-relations

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well said, Jim. I think that the instinct forh successive Governments/Home Secs/Justice Secs has been to 'play to the gallery' in an effort to maintain the illusion that they are all the 'party of Law and Order'. It was probably inevitable that this route would lead to a service that is not really achieving what it is intended to do because it is spending too much time contributing to the fallacies about what works in reducing offending. Cameron is still doing it was we speak. Services that are run by communities for communities is the only real answer. Always has been.

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/aug/11/charging-and-convicting-rioters

    ReplyDelete