Fixing the prison and probation crisis
The Government is taking action to keep the most dangerous offenders locked up, expand prison capacity and strengthen protections for victims and the public.
This Government inherited a prison system in crisis, putting the public at grave risk. Prisons were on the brink of collapse, with capacity dangerously close to being exceeded. That’s why the Government is taking decisive action.
1. The Government is building new prison places. By 2031, there will be more prison places than ever before
- This Government has already built around 3,200 new prison places and aims to create 14,000 by 2031, giving communities confidence that those who pose the greatest risk will be locked up.
- We are also speeding up the deportation of foreign criminals, saving money for taxpayers and protecting the public from dangerous offenders. Over 11,700 foreign criminals including murderers and rapists have been removed since July 2024.
2. The Government is making changes to sentencing so that prison places are used for the most dangerous criminals
- The most dangerous offenders must be locked up for a long time. That will not change.
- We are introducing reforms to prison release arrangements through the Sentencing Act 2026 which change the amount of time offenders will spend in prison. However, over 18,000 offenders serving life and extended sentences, murderers and those serving sentences for rape and serious sexual child and grooming offences, are completely excluded from these changes.
- For offences with sentences of 12 months or less, there will be a presumption against custodial sentences in favour of community sentences – including unpaid work, electronic monitoring tags, curfews and exclusion zones. Courts will still be able to send offenders to prison when there is significant risk of harm to the victim or public.
3. The Government is improving the monitoring of offenders when they are released from prison
- Prisoners who are released will not be free and can be recalled to prison at any time if they step out of line. Victims will have a say over tough new restrictions on offenders leaving prison.
- A record £700m investment going into probation by 2028/29, which has already helped us hire 1,000 new trainee probation officers, will enable 1,300 more to be added by March 2027.
- It also means we can ramp up the electronic tagging of offenders on release from prison, with nearly all offenders tagged and subject to curfews and exclusion zones to keep victims safe.
- Rape and certain child sex offenders will now face tighter controls than ever before after leaving prison, with more intensive probation supervision and a mandatory condition that will give constant access to their location via a GPS tag.
- We are also expanding other protections including chemical suppression for sex offenders, random drug testing, and bans from driving, pubs and events such as football matches.
4. The Government is improving support for victims
- The Government is introducing a stronger package of support for victims, including increased and improved contact to all affected victims.
- This will be supported by a £10m boost for victim support to fund extra local frontline services for victims to get trauma-focussed support.
- This is on top of the largest ever investment into specialist services that offer practical and emotional support to victims and witnesses. Over half a billion pounds of funding over the next three years will help charities and others deliver support like counselling and advice on attending court.
- A dedicated victim helpline will be available by October for all those affected by the reforms to provide emotional support and practical guidance.
--oo00oo--
The future appears to be already written. Published a few hours ago, here's the answer, here's the fix! I personally struggle with the logic of creating more routes to recall people back to prison whilst at the same time trying to free up space. Available capacity stands at around 1800 places. Early release scheme hopes to free up a further 1500 places. Recall figures however exceed 50,000 in the last year. My maths are not great, but I just can't see how they hope to achieve anything.
'Getafix
*****
The order of priority & language is essential to understand that nothing has changed in downing street or whitehall for decades & decades:
"As Home Secretary in Margaret Thatcher’s government from 1979 to 1983, Willie Whitelaw pursued a hard-line law and order agenda. He is best known for introducing the "short, sharp shock" policy for young offenders and embarking on major prison-building programs to tackle rising street crime."
Michael Howard: "Prison Works": Argued that keeping serious and persistent criminals behind bars reduces crime rates through incapacitation and deterrence.
Deterrence and Detection: Advocated for an across-the-board approach focusing heavily on measures to catch and punish lawbreakers rather than relying solely on social or economic explanations for crime.
Rejection of Fatalism: Maintained that rising crime is not an inevitable fact of modern life and can be reversed with political will.
The bliarweasel project: "Tony Blair famously defined his approach to law and order with the 1993 political slogan: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime." This dual strategy balanced strict enforcement and punishment for offenders alongside social interventions addressing poverty, lack of opportunity, and family breakdown" - sadly he unleashed tough on criminals but failed to deliver when it came to "the causes of crime", viz- "The government policy under Tony Blair has been one of relentless attack on our civil liberties; the expansion of new police powers, the introduction of new offences, and harsher penalties with longer custodial sentences – all of which has been matched by an increased weakening of the safeguards in the criminal justice process."
Now we have burn'em & co:
1. The Government is building new prison places. By 2031, there will be more prison places than ever before "HUZZAHH!"
2. The Government is making changes to sentencing so that prison places are used for the most dangerous criminals "LOCK 'EM'UP"
3. The Government is improving the monitoring of offenders when they are released from prison "MAKE THE PUNISHMENT LAST AS LONG AS POSSIBLE"
4. The Government is improving support for victims
A serious point can be made here whereby prioritising & elevating the victim's status whilst confabulating it with the means or severity of the punishment is not healthy. It runs the risk of making the victim a 'legitimate' target (in the eyes of the perpetrator) & potentially places the victim in greater peril, e.g. if the victim can be silenced then the punishment might be less harsh. The victim's voice is undoubtedly important, but the justice system should be the arbiter of punishment, not the volume, articulation or skill of the victim's opinion. Similarly I would argue that the imposition of victim work upon the probation service was, again, a big mistake. It has led to some terrible conflicts of interest.
*****
And there it is again.
The Government’s shiny new “Fixing the prison and probation crisis” page tells the public that prisoners released under these reforms “can be recalled to prison at any time if they step out of line”, that nearly all offenders will be electronically tagged, and that short sentences will increasingly be replaced by community sentences.
Who exactly does Government think is going to manage all of this? Because every one of those policies creates work for probation. More people managed in the community. More licence supervision. More electronic monitoring information. More curfews and exclusion zones. More potential breaches. More decisions about whether behaviour represents escalating risk. And, inevitably, more recall decision-making.
Then comes the reassurance: £700m and recruitment. Except read the Government’s own words carefully. The investment has apparently helped recruit 1,000 new TRAINEE probation officers, with another 1,300 to be added by March 2027.
We have literally just been discussing Millsike, where the Government accepts that having physical capacity isn’t enough because inexperienced staff require time to develop the skills and confidence to operate safely. Apparently probation works differently. And Getafix raises another rather obvious problem. Government is desperately trying to create prison capacity while simultaneously creating more routes through which people in the community can be recalled back into those same prisons.
Meanwhile OFPS is supposed to release 25% of probation capacity by reducing the amount of professional supervision some people receive. Which part of this is the coherent strategy?
More people in the community. More tagging. More surveillance. More potential breaches. More recalls. Less practitioner contact. An inexperienced workforce being recruited at pace. And a WMT that’s about to disappear. Yet the Government page presents all of this under the wonderfully reassuring heading:
“Fixing the prison and probation crisis.”
From the frontline it looks rather more like moving the crisis out of the prison gate and expecting probation to carry it. And when that doesn’t work, I suspect we’ll hear the same thing we always hear: “Lessons will be learned.” Perhaps somebody could try learning them before this time.
Twitter response:-
ReplyDelete"Yep, hasn’t got a clue and has swallowed everything the unaccountable incompetents have fed him." Former Prison Governor John Podmore
Delete22 Aug 2026
Alexander Baker
The myth of Britain’s functioning probation service
12 August 2026, 10:58am
The crisis in the criminal justice system will be the defining domestic policy issue of Andy Burnham’s government. The warning lights are flashing across the dashboard: England’s prisons are full, courts swamped and police forces riven by a mix of bureaucratic zealotry and incompetence. Public confidence in the system is wavering as it becomes evident that the state is struggling to fulfil certain basic functions in upholding law and order.
The lack of prison capacity in the country is the most emblematic of these failures. It is very difficult to convince people that the best way out of the prison crisis is to release convicted felons. Despite the government’s best attempts to target the release of prisoners convicted of arguably ‘lesser’ crimes, it turns out that the public’s entirely reasonable view is that it does not want sexual predators, domestic abusers or people convicted of the manslaughter of a police officer walking the streets.
It is onto this blazing fire that the government is now dumping gallons of gasoline
Unfortunately for the public, and for Burnham’s favourability in the polls, this crisis isn’t going away. The entire model for the government’s prison management programme – which does include the construction of new prisons – is predicated on the changes passed in the Sentencing Act 2026. This baked in the policy of earlier release for various categories of custodial sentence, including reductions for prisoners convicted of violent or sexual offences.
The government is not presiding over a ‘one-time’ emergency release but the introduction of a new system that lets more people out of prison so that they may spend a greater amount of time serving the remainder of their sentence within the community. But while a lot of attention has been devoted to prison capacity and imminent releases, there has been remarkably little discussion about the health of the system that is due to supervise offenders within the community on licence: the probation service.
Cont..
make things worse. Especially when the service is already having to compromise to manage its current caseload, by introducing changes to licence conditions.
DeleteUnder the new arrangement, active probation supervision ceases at the two-thirds point through a sentence. There are exemptions for some groups, but a greater number of offenders still serving sentences will enjoy a longer period without supervision.
While they might be required to comply with licence conditions such as wearing a tag (the utility of which is dubious) or not visiting a certain area, nobody will be actively enforcing these conditions. And since the punishment for a breach of licence is a potential recall to prison, the enforcement incentive is much weaker, because the prisons are full.
In 2022, law student Zara Aleena was sexually assaulted and murdered while walking home after a night out in East London. Her murderer, Jordan McSweeney, had been released on licence only nine days before committing the attack. His licence had been revoked after failing to show up to probation appointments, but he was not recalled to prison. Several other such harrowing cases exist. The need to manage a greater number of offenders on licence will make the situation worse.
After a supposedly popular first few weeks in office, Burnham is being forced to confront the realities of a policy that is allowing violent and dangerous felons to roam the streets. While prevaricating over whether to change the law to ensure that the killers of PC Andrew Harper remain in prison, the Prime Minister has still endorsed the continuation of the much-hated early releases.
Cont...
What he’s barely begun to appreciate is that the probation system that is supposed to supervise these released offenders is on the brink of collapse itself.
Delete'Getafix
Sorry if its a bit broken up, but you can get the gist.
(I wont be highlighting anything from the Spectator again, its nearly impossible to access and copy and paste!!)
Please consider not referring to probation service supervisees as offenders. Just because the legislation uses this nonsense language we blog commentators do not need to.
DeleteSome alternatives contributors may consider are parolees, licensees, supervisees, convicts, there are probably others but my favourite remains client. I will not repeat my justification for the term client even though the court order is an order that compels but I believe it is an accurate term particularly if a supervisee actually attends, I presume all still are required to sign a licence before release from court ordered custody and are present in court/albeit by video when the order is made if there is not a custodial component to the sentence.
The magical 700 million has been bandied around for several years now, yet few on the front line have seen any significant improvement , with most of the money going to private companies……I wonder who sits on their boards? In effect this is the monetisation of Criminal Justice in the UK via the recall system, if you are not already tagged and you are recalled, you soon will be thereby ensuring that the coffers of the providers of those services remain healthy. None of this addresses the increase in workload but conversely we will now be entering yet another era when it is becoming increasingly difficult to recall, which in turn will lead to an increase in SFOs and the usual witch finding that will seek to “ learn lessons” ……the only lesson you need to learn is the fact that practitioners know what the problems are but to listen to them will mean challenging our political masters, that’s not going to happen is it now? So dear reader the future at this time is a bleak one for practitioners, so expect the usual slew of platitudes ( we can’t do it without you etc) instead of decent pay rises, the continued deprofessionalisation of the service instead of real investment and the political will to let probation be probation….
ReplyDeleteOh look! Published today, HMI 75th Academic Insight report:-
ReplyDelete"Compassion fatigue can affect practitioners both professionally and personally, contributing to reduced wellbeing, diminished work performance and commitment, and a range of physical and emotional consequences. It is therefore vital that the service takes the concept seriously, prioritising staff wellbeing and creating the conditions for high-quality delivery, including through reduced sickness absence and improved staff retention. The focus should be on developing a system that promotes psychological safety and resilience, and the paper sets out a range of recommendations, including raising awareness of compassion fatigue, drawing on learning from other sectors, strengthening protective factors, adopting strength-based approaches, and maximising reflexivity."
But hey it's probation day today so let's pretend everything is rosy
ReplyDeleteNational call BS = ✔️
Kim late to join the call ✔️
Turn off chat and Q&A for staff ✔️
UK Probation Day is celebrated annually on 21st August. It was established to recognize and celebrate the vital work that probation officers, service officers, and support staff do across the country.
ReplyDeleteThe Purpose of UK Probation Day
Appreciation: It provides a dedicated time to thank probation workers for their emotionally demanding and often overlooked work in the community.
Public Safety: It highlights the essential role probation plays in reducing reoffending, assessing risk, and keeping the public safe.
Support: It serves as an occasion to raise awareness of the challenges faced by the Probation Service, such as high caseloads and sector funding.
How very interesting that there is so far radio silence about this on MoJ and also HMPPS intranet....
ReplyDeleteRe "As Home Secretary in Margaret Thatcher’s government from 1979 to 1983, Willie Whitelaw pursued a hard-line law and order agenda. He is best known for introducing the "short, sharp shock" policy for young offenders and embarking on major prison-building programs to tackle rising street crime."
ReplyDeleteWhoever wrote that misunderstands how Whitelaw worked and his personal attitudes.
I was at the Napo AGM and Conference where Whitelaw addressed the members and as he said about the short sharp shock - with many press reporters in attendance he looked at the conference members and gave a pronounced wink.
Like so many other politicians he said one thing in press releases for pubic consumption but believed something very different.
Interestingly this was the era of piloting new sentencing approaches.
The Short Sharp Shock regime's were introduced at two out of many Detention centres for convicts aged under 21 sentenced to less than 6 months but normally released after 2 or 4 months depending on whether it was a 6 or 3 month sentence.
The programme was never introduced to the remainder of the Detention Centres - Send in Surrey was one - the other was somewhere in the north of England. Very few probation officers (only POs [or occasionally CQSW qualified Social Workers] supervised statutory convicts in those days) would have seen a person sentenced to a short sharp shock.
If my recollection is correct detention centres and the short sharp shock existed long before Whitelaw became home secretary.
Delete6 weeks 4 days served for a 3 month sentence, and 13 weeks served from a 6 month sentence.
It was during Whitelaws time (1982-3?), that Borstals went, (a sentence of 6 months to 2 years) and together with the YP system (young prisoner) became an all in one young offender institution system.
Its my personal opinion, but I see Whitelaw as a saint compared to Leon Britton who really did take a rod to the CJS.
He was so busy weilding the stick, he forgot the odd carrot can sometimes work wonders.
'Getafix