Thursday, 27 November 2025

Towards a Moral Revolution

I must be honest, I've become increasingly demoralised by the criminal justice picture emerging on a daily basis, together with no sign of hope for the Probation Service returning to something approaching the force for good it once was. Having to admit failure is never an easy thing to do and I've always had the naive belief that a blog could be part of trying to make things better. Surely the force of sound argument, evidence and testimony can change things?

Our recent discussions surrounding morality have very neatly brought us to the BBC's Reith lectures and a tantalising notion of hope in the offing. I urge readers to come along on this journey. I didn't catch the first broadcast on Tuesday, but listened to the linear repeat last night. It's good and it's promising:-

"What we need now is not just better policies or better politicians. We need a moral revolution. We need to revive an ancient idea, almost laughable in today's climate, that the purpose of power is to do good. And that is the goal of this lecture series. To argue that the most urgent transformation of our time is not technological or geopolitical or industrial, but moral. We need a new kind of ambition, not for status, or wealth, or fame, but for integrity, courage, and public service, a moral ambition. This may sound.....   And yet, it's precisely because things can get much worse that they can also get much better. History is not just a record of the declines. It's also full of astonishing turnarounds. In my next Reith Lecture, I will show how moral revolutions have shaped the past and how we can make it happen again."

The transcript indicates a missing word, so I used AI to sort it:-

"The most likely missing word is "controversial" or another word with a similar meaning, as the full sentence would be: "This may sound controversial, and yet, it's precisely because things can get much worse that they can also get much better." The statement suggests that the potential for extreme negative outcomes provides the necessary impetus for significant positive change."

The transcript can be found here and all episodes here.

10 comments:

  1. link to bbc Media Show which includes brief discussion of Aunty Squealer's last minute censoring of the Reith Lecture, which they can't repeat.

    As posted here yesterday, Rutger said on social media:

    "The BBC has decided to censor the opening lecture of a series they invited me to deliver.

    They removed the sentence in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.”

    This line was taken out of a lecture they commissioned, reviewed through the full editorial process, and recorded four weeks ago in front of 500 people in the BBC Radio Theatre."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002mmxs

    "the controversy over editing Rutger Bregman’s Reith Lecture to remove a line about Donald Trump."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Off topic, but yet another Probation Officer stabbed yesterday

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no this is awful. Hope they are okay

      Delete
    2. Trainee probation officer stabbed yesterday. Circumstances being kept tight lipped. Questions raised as to why changes since Preston haven’t been implemented, being blamed on funding and all offices requesting it. Not good enough. I don’t want to work for this service anymore, we are not valued.

      Delete
  3. Almost 6 months after the last one. Still no security or scanners in the office. Yet Martin Davis assures us staff security is at a premium. yeah right sure it is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2025-10-03/bereaved-mother-shines-light-on-thread-bare-probation-service

    ReplyDelete
  5. interesting...

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/probation-officers-warnings-removed/7YBGB3PB3OH5B7JSE7QUON7Q74/

    Probation officer Stanley Gilmore to challenge what he says was the sanitising of his risk assessment of a violent offender, at the High Court in Wellington

    In an exclusive report, Phil Taylor reveals a probation officer's safety warnings about a prisoner were secretly removed. The man cut his bracelet and attacked a man with a bottle only months after release.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good on Mr. Gilmore. Win, lose or draw, he should be able to clarify a situation which exists in this country too.
    I had issues previously about a pre-sentence report where there was a great disparity between what the quality control audit people felt and what the sentencing judge thought.
    I asked the question, who are we writing the report for, the probation service or the sentencer. There was much huffing and puffing and a bit of threatening before it all went away unanswered. I know from speaking to colleagues that I was not on my own.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can recall being in a parole hearing when the case manager was asked to express their opinion on how manageable was risk.
    The initial response was, ‘my manager says…..’ the panel quite rightly pressed the matter in line with parole board rules and we’re then told, ‘ the area manger thinks,……’ Upon being asked a third time, they were told,’the MAPPA committee has decided……’
    This is what they have created. Supposed professionals who either don’t have, or who aren’t allowed to express an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://capx.co/our-probation-crisis-is-no-laughing-matter

      Delete