Thursday, 22 May 2025

Crime and Punishment

There's going to be a lot of talk about criminal justice today and this from the Guardian sets the scene:-

Shabana Mahmood considers chemical castration for serious sex offenders

Shabana Mahmood, the lord chancellor, is considering mandatory chemical castration for the most serious sex offenders, according to government sources.

The minister’s department is planning to expand a pilot to 20 regions as part of a package of “radical” measures to free thousands of prisoners and ease prison overcrowding in England and Wales.

As well as releasing and tagging killers and rapists after they have served half of their sentence, she is considering the findings of an independent sentencing review that has also called for the government to build an evidence base on drugs that “suppress libido” or reduce “sexual thoughts”.

They are among 48 recommendations put forward by David Gauke, the chair of the review.

Mahmood is expected to address the Commons on Thursday to outline which measures she will accept in a major overhaul of criminal justice. Government sources said she is expected to accept the review’s key measures including that well-behaved prisoners should be released on tag after serving a third of their sentences.

She has also accepted that those who have committed serious sexual or violent crimes could be freed to serve their sentence in the community after they have served half of their sentence.

One of Gauke’s suggestions – that the most dangerous offenders should be allowed to apply for parole earlier if they earn “credits” – has been dismissed by sources close to the justice secretary.

The report has urged ministers to build a comprehensive evidence base around the use of chemical suppression for sex offenders and examine the findings of similar programmes in Germany, Denmark and Poland.

“Problematic sexual arousal and preoccupation can be reduced via chemical suppressants and other medications, which can be prescribed for individuals who have committed a sexual offence under certain circumstances,” the report notes.

It points out that a 2022 pilot programme at prisons in south-west England which uses libido-suppressing drugs is due to end next year and recommends “continued funding of services in this area”. The government plans to expand the pilot using these as a staging post to a full, nationwide rollout, a source close to Mahmood said.

The approach is delivered through two drugs. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) limit invasive sexual thoughts. Anti-androgens reduce the production of testosterone and limit libido. The drugs are taken alongside psychiatric work that targets other causes of sexual offending, such as a desire for power and control.

Mahmood is exploring whether chemical castration could be made mandatory, instead of voluntary, for the most serious offenders, the source said. Sexual offences accounted for 21% of adults serving immediate custodial sentences at the end of March 2025. The report notes that participation in any such programme would be voluntary in England and Wales.

Among the main recommendations, Gauke, the former Conservative justice secretary, said the government should:
  • Ensure custodial sentences under 12 months are only used in exceptional circumstances.
  • Extend suspended sentences to up to three years and encourage greater use of deferred sentences for low-risk offenders.
  • Give courts greater flexibility to use fines and ancillary orders like travel, driving and football bans.
  • Allow probation officers to adjust the level of supervision based on risk and compliance with licence conditions.
  • Expand specialist domestic abuse courts to improve support for victims.
  • Expand tagging for all perpetrators of violence against women and girls.
  • Improve training for practitioners and the judiciary on violence against women and girls.
  • Change the statutory purposes of sentencing so judges and magistrates must consider protecting victims as much as they consider punishment and rehabilitation when passing sentences.
Gauke has called for the need to increase funding and resources for the probation service, including expanding the availability of electronic monitoring equipment like tags, and warned that there will be a “public backlash” if money is not found.

“If probation are left without additional resources then the risk is that we won’t make progress on rehabilitation and there will be a public backlash,” he said.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council echoed Gauke’s calls for more resources.

Chief constable Sacha Hatchett, national policing lead for criminal justice, said: “Out of prison should not mean out of control. If we are going to have fewer people in prison, we need to ensure that we collectively have the resources and powers to manage the risk offenders pose outside prison.

“Adequate funding to support these measures must be reflected in the upcoming spending review, as well as investment in probation services and technology, including electronic monitoring.”

Penal reform group the Howard League welcomed the recommendations.

Andrea Coomber, the chief executive, said: “The ball is now in the government’s court. Solving the prison capacity crisis will require major intervention and, as the review recognises, this will only succeed if reform and investment deliver an effective and responsive probation service that works to cut crime in the community.”

The Conservatives have condemned Gauke’s review. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: “By scrapping short prison sentences Starmer is effectively decriminalising crimes like burglary, theft and assault. This is a gift to criminals who will be free to offend with impunity.”

31 comments:

  1. I remember that Alan Turing was chemically castrated as part of Probation supervision as an alternative to custody for what was considered a crime back then. He was an extremely talented athlete and as a result of the ‘treatment’ grew breasts.The contribution that he and others who worked at Bletchley Park was a secret. This is quite rightly regarded as a shameful period in Probations past that was abandoned as cruel and unreasonable. Castration either physically or chemically is barbaric and the sort of measure that those loonies in Reform might consider. What is the SoS thinking of?

    ReplyDelete
  2. BBC today the unfortunate general secretary Napo yet again fails. Any airtime should be used to reinforce the impact of the failing gov anti crime agenda. The reinforced strategy to cope with widening victim needs and the resources required to supervise offenders across the broadest fields of offending behaviours and social problems. Regrettably in the wrong forum he says we need a pay rise. Lawrence should appreciate he has a negotiating forum for thos issues he makes probation staff look like money is the issue what a fool we have in the union and a joker as the leader. The jokes on us the members . Go Lawrence go quickly please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think your commentary is a bit unkind but the sentiment may be right as it is a new time and Ian Lawrence is certainly not up to what we need. If he could be helped to go I do think Napo members and a union reshuffle would help us better shape up future challenge. The fact is Ian Lawrence is of a particular generation and values set which don't do us well today. There's a debate to be had. He has never achieved anything than cling on and hope so why is he there at all.

      Delete
  3. Listening to explanations and interviews on BBC Radio 4 World at One programme it is difficult to understand the detail - also no mention of the fact that many probation service staff are not currently trained probation officers who will be doing the assessments involved. I am not suggesting that only trained pos are competent to assess as many psos have lots of experience.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "New public opinion research from More in Common and the Common Ground Justice Project finds Britons think the justice system is broken, with widespread demands for radical change."

    https://www.moreincommon.org.uk/our-work/research/course-correction/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Prison officers to get 4% pay rise, Mahmood says
    Prison officers in England and Wales will get a pay rise of 4% in 2025-26, Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, has announced. This will cover managers and governors too. In a written ministerial statement she says she is accepting in full the recommendations from the Prison Service Pay Review Body. She says:

    ReplyDelete
  6. So if Prison officers deserve a 4% pay rise on top of the 6% they had last year surely Probation Staff should get a minimum 10% considering we got sweet fa last year and we are having everything pushed onto us...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We got Ian Lawrence loudmouth but in effective so sweet fa is most certainly the outcome.

      Delete
  7. More tagging!! Is that this what probation has become. Glorified cctv controllers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The message on the intranet regarding prison pay rise was that “probation are not impacted” as subject to civil service pay etc so I’m expecting a hefty 2.8% pay rise end of the year ….

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But they don't give us civil servant pensions so they can sod off giving us civil service pay rises

      Delete
    2. Exactly !

      Delete
  9. Cue tomorrow's 11am dial in, where no doubt comments will be disabled. A bottle of red plonk will be needed tomorrow evening

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ending with the usual 'we couldn't do it without your hardwork and dedication' drivel

      Delete
    2. Oh yes. We'll continue to dump even more work and targets on overstretched probation staff and when the inevitable SFOs happen, blame probation.

      Rinse, repeat

      Delete
  10. https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/podcast/chemical-castration-and-the-governments-prison-plan-is-it-nuts/

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://www.aol.co.uk/news/serious-sex-offenders-could-castrated-064135093.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. BBC News website:-

    Although the review recommends more resources for probation, staff say they are worried about being put under even more pressure.

    One probation officer told BBC News: "We can't cope now, God knows how we'll cope if these recommendations are accepted.

    "I'm already looking for another job. It's just not possible to do all this work."

    National Association of Probation Officers general secretary Ian Lawrence told BBC Breakfast he welcomed the report but warned the early release scheme "won't hang together" without "desperately needed resources into the probation service".

    England and Wales has one of the highest prison population rates in western Europe.

    An interim report from the Gauke review, published in February, found the prison overcrowding problem was driven by successive governments trying to look "tough on crime".

    Despite overall crime rates declining since the mid-1990s, the prison population in England and Wales almost doubled between 1993 and 2012, while reoffending has remained high, it said.

    Gauke also previously warned that without radical change, prisons in England and Wales could run out of space again by next Spring.

    Thursday's recommendations, Gauke has said, are "focused not only on bringing the prison population under control but ultimately reducing reoffending and ensuring victims are protected".

    "Taken as a package, these measures should ensure the government is never again in a position where it is forced to rely on the emergency release of prisoners," he added.

    ReplyDelete
  13. More electronic tagging? EMS are basically a basket case of poor management at the moment, so i'm not sure that's a good idea. MOPAC in London was far better. I've had 6 emails about one of my offenders being in breach of his tag and i've responded 6 times, he's in prison on recall. Administratively blunder some. As for the pay rise for prison officers. Gosh, the primacy they have just keeps paying dividends. Meanwhile, we don't even get the rise based on the CBF. The prisons moan about overcrowding and they get whatever they want. Meanwhile, zero has been done about Probation in the community's workload. When you have a two-tier system like this, inequalities become stark and the bullying that the HMPPS CEO has said will be stamped out, is still there. It just isn't as obvious. Passivity of 'gentle reminders' gives way to confused hierarchies of 'escalating' matters to put you in your place. Until we decouple from the dreadfully one-sided and iron wrought chains of the prison service and become a probation trust in our own right, this mess continues and people will just end up leaving. Nothing has or will be done about workloads and if we are to get more money to deal with these new sentences, it'll be a lime to a lemon compared to if the prisons went cap in hand. A new money tree will be found. Not so likely for Probation in the community that gets the crumbs of any investment.

    ReplyDelete
  14. BBC 6pm news:- "The government will invest more in Probation, but the proposals will require legislation". What does that mean exactly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every extra pound to be accounted for will result in a bill, just like in a restaurant.

      Delete
  15. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/682d8d995ba51be7c0f45371/independent-sentencing-review-report-part_2.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Chapter Seven: The role of the Probation Service

    The Review recognises the
    considerable strain the Probation
    Service is already under. The Call
    for Evidence highlighted that
    significant budget constraints,
    high caseloads and reliance on
    legacy technology have squeezed
    the Probation Service’s capacity
    to manage offenders and provide
    tailored support focused on
    rehabilitation."

    That favourite technique of stating the bleeding obvious as inspired revelation:

    "In the immediate term, the
    Probation Service will need to
    prioritise its resources and focus
    its efforts where it will have the
    highest impact in terms of reducing
    reoffending and managing
    risk of harm."

    Praise for hmpps - why??? Its utter bollox from a bullying organisation that has no credibility:

    "Some prioritisation has already
    begun – in April 2024, HMPPS
    introduced ‘Reset’ which ended
    supervision for offenders in the final
    third of their community sentence
    or time on licence and suspended
    post-sentence supervision (except
    for certain high-risk groups)."

    And then we're back to the bleedin obvious again:

    "This Review believes prioritisation of
    resources must be complemented
    by a more fundamental shift in the
    way the Probation Service works,
    prioritising opportunities to build
    relationships with offenders to
    rehabilitate them, thereby reducing
    reoffending and the risk of harm to
    victims."

    Ooo, err, missus... who let gauke say this shite:

    "practitioners must be
    empowered to use their own
    initiative, professional judgement
    and skills when delivering sentences
    and managing offenders in the
    community, rather than following
    onerous administrative processes."

    Recommendation 7.1: Increase investment in the
    Probation Service to support capacity and resilience

    Leveraging the third sector

    Recommendation 7.2: Increase funding available for the
    third sector to support the Probation Service to manage
    offenders in the community and enable increased
    commissioning of local organisations

    Recommendation 7.3: Expand the use of the third sector
    to support offenders on community sentences and
    licence, to help the Probation Service prioritise resource
    and improve outcomes for offenders

    And now we have yet another unique proposal - hands up who thinks this makes sense:

    Recommendation 7.4: Increase the use of proven
    technologies in the Probation Service, to enable more
    meaningful engagement between practitioners and
    offenders on probation

    "proven technologies in the Probation Service - The Ministry of Justice is piloting a new digital platform which brings all necessary information about an offender together in one place" - hahahaha - CNomis/PNomis anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Maximum of 2 years for SSO is in legislation ergo proposed change to 3 years will need legislation. I haven't read the full paper so there may be other things, maybe extending maxima for tags? Can anyone please post a link?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Fear not colleagues, remember NAPO has submitted a claim for a pay increase of 12%. This from their website today…….’Napo welcomes the Sentencing Review and in particular its focus on the critical role the probation service plays in the supervision and the rehabilitation of people in the criminal justice system. The review vindicates Napo’s long held view that radical action is needed to resolve the staffing and workload crisis probation has been struggling with for a number of years.

    The review is right to look at the culture of the probation service and how it has shifted to far towards being a law enforcement agency and has lost sight of its core purpose of rehabilitation. We welcome the view that there needs to be greater balance between compliance and enforcement and that of advising and supporting people to turn their lives around.

    We welcome the recommendation that Rehabilitation Requirements and Post Sentence Supervision are revoked and there is a return to greater flexibility in how an individual is supervised. A probation requirement would enable our members to tailor supervision to meet the needs of the person they supervise as opposed to the rigid approach probation has adopted over the years.

    Whilst the measures outlined in the review will not give immediate relief to our members, it will offer some light at the end of the tunnel. However, Napo has reservations about HMPPS’s ability to make the necessary changes when they were the architects of many of the problems the service now faces. As we saw with the publication of the Rademaker report, our members will be sceptical as to whether or not senior leaders in HMPPS are capable of making any real change. Napo was clear in our submission that we do not believe that the probation service can survive while it is still part of the civil service.

    General Secretary Ian Lawrence said: “This review offers some hope for the future, but Napo has been asking HMPPS to make many of these changes over the last 2 years to little avail. We need a commitment from the government that they will take immediate action not only to implement the recommendations, but also to put its hand in its pockets and reward our members with a decent pay rise.”

    A key aspect of the review is the call for significant investment in the probation service. Napo firmly believes that after years of pay freezes, Napo members must see the benefit of this investment on the frontline. Ian Lawrence said: “Any previous investment in probation has been spent on the private sector for either IT or electronic monitoring. What we need to see now is a direct investment in staff. Without that we will see a continual rise in retention rates and continued staffing crisis. Our members cannot be expected to pick up the mess of the prisons crisis and see little in return for their efforts.”

    ReplyDelete
  19. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clygg5r6zg7o

    Probation services in Nottinghamshire have been rated "inadequate" following visits by inspectors.

    The Nottingham City Probation Delivery Unit (PDU) and the Nottinghamshire PDU were separately inspected by HM Inspectorate of Probation in March.

    Both services were found to be understaffed with "urgent improvements needed", and a number of recommendations for change were put forward.

    Martin Jones, chief inspector of probation, said both PDUs would be "undoubtedly disappointed", but he was confident improvements could be made.

    The inspections were the first to take place of each service since PDUs were established under the unification of probation services in 2021.

    In Nottingham, inspectors had "serious concerns" about the quality of work to keep people safe with "insufficient focus on public protection".

    Mechanisms in place for sharing information with the police and children's services were too often ineffective, Mr Jones said.

    The report said there were failures to identify all potential children at risk and that practitioners did not seek out information from necessary local authorities.

    On one occasion, a practitioner made safeguarding inquiries in relation to a 31-year-old father who had received a suspended sentence for drug-related offences - but a response was not received for three months during which time the man's contact with his child was "not clearly assessed".

    Despite a range of available services and efforts made to meet "diverse needs" of people on probation, the inspection found there were "worryingly low rates of referrals across almost all the services on offer".

    The report made six recommendations to Nottingham PDU, including to improve the quality of work to assess, plan for, manage, and review risk of harm, and to ensure domestic abuse and safeguarding information was complete and sufficiently analysed in all cases.

    Inspectors found the Nottinghamshire PDU was understaffed despite there being positive team morale and a "healthy culture".

    Workloads were also sometimes unmanageable with staff covering for sickness or vacant posts, inspectors said.

    "Staff were also struggling with the impact of large-scale, time-pressured changes to process which meant they were often fatigued or overwhelmed," the report said.

    Similarly to the city's unit, the quality of work to keep people safe was found to be "insufficient".

    Work to reduce reoffending was low in most cases that were looked at during the inspection and flagged in the report as a weakness for the unit.

    The report added that less than half of the people that needed it received sufficient help with alcohol and drug misuse.

    Nottinghamshire PDU, which has contact centres in Nottingham, Worksop, Mansfield and Newark, received five recommendations for improvements.

    This included requests to ensure facilities to interview people on probation were safe and private, and to devise and implement arrangements for monitoring and improving the quality of sentence management work delivered by practitioners.

    A statement from Mr Jones said: "Given the improving resourcing picture at Nottingham City and the strong staff culture at Nottinghamshire, there are some potential building blocks for success in each PDU.

    "With an increased focus on the quality of service delivery and work to protect the public, I am confident improvements can be made."

    https://cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/32/2025/05/An-inspection-of-probation-services-in-Nottingham-City-PDU-1.pdf

    Fieldwork started March 2025 Score 3/21
    Overall rating Inadequate

    https://cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/32/2025/05/An-inspection-of-probation-services-in-Nottinghamshire-PDU-1.pdf

    Fieldwork started March 2025 Score 3/21
    Overall rating Inadequate

    ReplyDelete
  20. one of "awks gawks" sources for his report:

    http://koreabizwire.com/south-korean-researchers-develop-ai-system-to-predict-crime-before-it-happens/287198

    "In a breakthrough that could revolutionize law enforcement, South Korean researchers have developed artificial intelligence technology capable of predicting criminal activity before it occurs."

    Reassuring, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh Mr Gauke... or are you Seb Gorka in disguise? Another quoted reference for *that* report:

    "The University of Cincinnati's School of Information Technology professors are developing a chatbot for correction agencies that will help supervision officers and people on parole.

    Chatbots, such as ChatGPT, have exploded in popularity for their ability to mimic human conversation and generate responses to requests and questions posed by their human users."

    NB: Trump praised Gorka, who was born in the UK to Hungarian parents, as a “tireless advocate for the America First Agenda and the MAGA Movement”.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The Report - Annex A - Terms of Reference

    This review of sentencing is tasked
    with a comprehensive re-evaluation
    of our sentencing framework.

    To do so, the review will be guided
    by 3 principles:
    • firstly, sentences must punish
    offenders and protect the
    public - there must always be
    space in prison for the most
    dangerous offenders
    • secondly, sentences must
    encourage offenders to turn their
    backs on a life of crime, cutting
    crime by reducing reoffending
    • thirdly, we must expand and
    make greater use of punishment
    outside of prison

    In developing their
    recommendations, the independent
    Chair and panel are encouraged to
    draw not only on national data but
    also on international comparisons.

    The Rt. Hon David Gauke - Chair (& employed as head of public policy at Macfarlanes, voted City Firm of the Year at The Lawyer Awards 2023)
    Lord Burnett
    Catherine Larsen KPM
    Sir Peter Lewis KCMG, CB
    Nicola Padfield KC (Hon)
    Andrea Simon

    and not forgetting the nemesis of probation...

    Michael Spurr CB
    Michael Spurr worked in Prisons
    and Probation for 36 years. He was
    Governor at HMYOI Aylesbury, HMP
    Wayland and HMP/YOI Norwich
    before joining HM Prison Service
    Management Board in 2003.
    He was Chief Executive of the
    National Offender Management
    Service / HM Prison and Probation
    Service from 2010-2019. Michael is
    currently Chair at the Butler Trust
    and Chair at Whitechapel Mission -
    providing services to the homeless
    in East London.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Independent Sentencing Review

    Conclusion

    The measures proposed by this
    Review, if implemented in full,
    should meet the challenges set out
    in the foreword.

    Demand for prison places is
    currently projected to exceed
    the supply of places. Our
    recommendations should prevent
    this from happening.

    Our probation system is currently
    under great pressure. We have
    set out a plan under which it will
    be able to cope with additional
    responsibilities by better focusing
    the current activities of the
    Probation Service, making better use
    of technology and expanding those
    services that can make a material
    difference to rehabilitating offenders
    in the community.

    Technology can play an important
    role in assisting that rehabilitation
    but also in ensuring that offenders
    are properly monitored, thereby
    assisting in protecting the public.

    if our proposed sentence
    reform is implemented but the
    probation system is left unable to
    cope with the additional demands,
    the consequence will be growing
    pressures to make more use of
    custodial sentences.

    To deliver a shift
    away from custody to community
    sentences will require greater
    confidence in the effectiveness of
    community sentences.

    If we can make our probation
    system more effective and, in doing
    so, win greater confidence from
    the judiciary, if we can harness the
    benefits of technology, if we can
    be more effective in addressing
    some of the causes of criminality
    (such as drink and drug addiction or
    mental illness)...

    Dear Santa

    If we can harness the magic of the Tooth Fairy. if we can channel the chakras of the human body, if we can succeed in Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft, if we can make better use of alchemy & address the causes of poverty...

    Will we ever be told how much of our precious public funds were gifted to these clowns for the publication of this uber-bollox?

    Its embarassing, insulting & pointless.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This is how much Gauke respected comments from probation staff. So much that he didn’t name them. This is not a staff led review. Probation is barely represented.

    401 The Review’s engagement with Probation Delivery Units (2025)

    504 Frontline HMPPS staff, Call for Evidence response, (2025)

    505 Frontline HMPPS staff, Call for Evidence response, (2025)

    ReplyDelete