Friday, 11 October 2024

Probation Is Waiting

Here we have Lord Timpson's speech to the PGA a few days ago. I wonder how long it will be before he gets around to addressing probation's problems?

Prison Governors Association Speech

Lord Timpson, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, sets out why prison governors are at the forefront of efforts to drive down reoffending.

Thank you for that introduction, Graham, and for the invitation to speak – it’s great to be here. Thanks to everyone involved for putting this event together. Let me start by saying just how grateful I am for the PGA’s work. You speak up for change, where change is needed…You push Government, where it needs to be pushed…And you do it not just for those you represent, but in the interests of public safety too. Your voice is valued, and we thank you for it… even when you say things we don’t necessarily want to hear.

I know it’s your first annual conference since becoming PGA President, Tom – congratulations again on your appointment. Let me also congratulate your new Vice-Chairs, Mark, and Carl, on their appointments too. I’ve known Tom for a while now - we once even shadowed each other a few years ago, when he was Governor at HMP Wakefield, and I headed up the Timpson Group.

I took Tom to visit some of our shops – one branch was in Uttoxeter Tesco, as I recall – while I found out what it’s like to lead one of our toughest prisons. I know who has it harder…! And now I’m wearing a new hat, I did ask Tom if he fancied another job swap – but for some reason he wasn’t up for it. I can’t think why…

I realise that the CEO of a business and prison governor are very different roles – but there are similarities, too. Both manage complex organisations. Both need a strategic brain, excellent management skills, the ability to communicate, inspire and motivate. But the main difference is this: most people know what a CEO does, what their job entails.

You, on the other hand, are largely hidden from view. Even when prisons are plastered all over our TV screens, as they are right now. The average person would have little idea about your day-to-day – what it really means to lead a prison in 2024, as Tom has set out so starkly just now.

Working every hour, under extraordinary pressure, to run safe and secure regimes. Dealing with self-harm, deaths and the scourge of drugs on a daily basis. Supporting your teams and trying to nurture them in an environment more stressful than most could imagine. Every challenge amplified, because our prisons are full to bursting. These are the realities you face every day.

Now, prisons have always fascinated me – since I was a young boy, and my Mum, Alex, would take the babies she’d fostered into HMP Styal, so their mothers could see them. I’d sit outside in the car and wonder what was going on inside… What had these women done that was so terrible, that they couldn’t be with their babies? It was the start of a life-long interest.

And as you may know, around 10 percent of people who work for Timpson are ex-offenders. It all started by chance 22 years ago, when, as a new CEO, I visited a local prison and met Matt – who got into a fight after his A-levels, and instead of going to university, went to jail. Matt showed me around the wing, and I immediately liked him. He was bright, enthusiastic, and I thought he was just the sort of person we wanted in the business. So I told him – “when you get out, I’ll give you a job.” And the rest is history.

Matt went on to be one of our most successful branch managers – in a branch just a stone’s throw from the prison he served time in. He’s still there today. And while he hasn’t gone far physically, he’s travelled lightyears in terms of what he’s achieved…Because he had the will to turn his life around, and that extra support to get into work. I knew there must be more great people like Matt in our prisons, and from then on, we decided to proactively recruit ex-offenders.

Later, working with you, we set up prison training academies…Then to create Employment Advisory Boards, building those vital links between prisons and local employers. And, in 2016, I was honoured to become Chair of the Prison Reform Trust. So I’ve been behind the scenes.

And in that time, one constant has been your outstanding leadership, in the most challenging circumstances. It has been a privilege to get to know you, and to see the incredible work you do. Thank you. You have our deepest respect, and our gratitude.

Over the years there has been much debate about what prison is primarily for – be it punishment, public protection or deterrence. Of course, it’s all of these things. It’s right that dangerous people are taken off our streets – and that people who destroy lives and wreck our communities face the consequences. But if we cut to the core of it, prison should also be about reducing offending. That’s the only way we are genuinely going to protect the public.

I say ‘should’, here, because it’s something we haven’t always been very good at in this country. I know you’d agree. Serious criminals should see the inside of a jail cell – and the most dangerous should stay there. But what happens next to the many offenders who will someday be let out really matters.

For the vast majority of offenders, being locked up is a fork in the road. One way on that road can lead them to turn their lives around… The other will take them straight back to prison. Too often, it’s the latter. And I’ve no doubt how deeply frustrating it must be for you to see the same faces at your gates again and again.

The numbers are clear – 80 percent of offending in this country is reoffending. That is too high by any measure. But I know just how determined you are to turn that around. We all know what the answers are. I know that you know what needs to be done. My job is to help you realise those ambitions.

Having worked in the family business since I was 14, I hope I’ve learnt a few things about leadership and responsibility along the way. There are plenty of philosophies out there. I found that a strong culture and high standards – rooted in trust, and kindness – was what worked for us. And I firmly believe that strong leaders – you – are the single most important element in a good prison.

You set the culture… You set those high standards for your teams to follow, and for the prisoners you rehabilitate. And I can’t stress enough how important high standards are in our prisons. Put it this way - I’ve never known a great organisation to have poor standards. That starts with the basics - a clean, tidy, environment, where prisoners and staff respect the rules.

When I was a CEO, I’d check the Timpson head office car park for weeds and litter…Small things, I know. But they really matter…Those first impressions for people arriving really matter…And as leaders, it’s our job to lead by example. And in over 20 years of being involved with prisons, I can’t think of a time when your job has been tougher.

For too long, you’ve been doing your best in very challenging circumstances. People don’t turn up to work to get beaten up, they turn up to inspire people, and to and turn lives around. Yet our crammed prisons are breeding violence – which threatens everyone’s safety, staff and prisoners alike…Staff shortages - and a lack of experienced staff - stretch your ability to run the kind of regimes you want to run. While so many of your prisons are dilapidated, in desperate need of repair…

I’m grateful to Charlie Taylor – who is up next – for HMIP’s unflinching focus on these issues. And I know it hasn’t been easy, trying to rehabilitate offenders in a system teetering on the edge of disaster. A system that, when we came into government, had been run at 99 percent capacity for months. I should emphasise - none of this is your doing – in fact, the PGA has been sounding the alarm loud and clear. That’s why we had to take the tough decision to bring in changes to automatic release to ease the pressure on our prisons.

It was, quite literally, a rescue effort. If we hadn’t acted, the justice system would have ground to a halt: Courts would have been unable to hold trials and police unable to make arrests. We would have faced the total breakdown of law and order. We only have to look at the recent disorder on our streets to see how close to catastrophe we came…Because we could deliver justice swiftly, we brought the violence to an end.

But, in the process, we came dangerously close to running out of prison space entirely. We had no choice but to introduce emergency measures in the first few days of this new Government. It was only thanks to the heroic efforts of prison and probation staff, that we pulled through. We didn’t want to do this. But we were left with no choice…To attempt to delay any further, would have allowed our justice system to collapse. We could never have allowed that: This Government will always put the safety of the public – first.

Throughout all of this you have been under immense pressure. Offender management units, in particular, have borne the brunt of several emergency measures…While more broadly the estate has coped with higher numbers of late arrivals and redirections. It’s in times like these that strong leadership matters most. We couldn’t have managed this crisis without you. And while there is still work to be done ahead of the next releases later this month, I want to thank you, again, for everything you’ve done to get us to this point.

So, our changes have bought us some time. Time for the system to catch its breath. But these challenges haven’t just disappeared, and the crisis isn’t over. If things don’t change, we’ll end up in the same position all over again… Sooner than we care to mention. I want us to get a point where you can run your prisons how you want to run them…

That is why the Justice Secretary has been clear that getting prisons built is a priority for her. That is why we will take control of the planning process, and deem prison development of national importance. And we also need decent regimes, that help offenders turn their backs on crime for good.

I know there is brilliant, innovative work going on, and I want to encourage more of it. But innovating is difficult – impossible, even - when you’re so full that you can’t let prisoners out of their cells. That’s why it is essential we resolve this capacity crisis…So we can support and empower you to go even further to reduce reoffending. And, if we create the right conditions for you to do your jobs as you’d want to do them – I hope to see more of you staying in post for longer, too.

Stability at the top is crucial. Because our prisons are on a journey, and there’s a long road ahead. Culture change doesn’t happen overnight. In my experience, it can take anywhere from three to five years to really move an organisation on. Much of our success will be down to you, our prison leaders. So I want to see more of you staying on that road for longer – and I want you to tell me how we can support you to do that.

Great prisons need great leaders. But second, they need hardworking dedicated staff, like the officers in your teams. Fundamentally, prisons are a people business – like any company. As a CEO, I found that the happier people are in their jobs, the better they work. If they feel valued, trusted and cared for, they are going to perform well for you. And in your teams, people are working under such intense pressure day in, day out.

The relationships - between you, and your staff… and your staff and your prisoners – go right to the core of safe, decent prisons. If we invest in officer training – in their well-being, and development – we empower them to do much more than simply maintain order. We empower them to become agents of change – to help people turn their lives around.

I’ve met plenty of men and women who say that a prison officer transformed their life. Officers who took the time to mentor them - who really got to know the people on their wing. Who knew if their mum wasn’t well, or when their kids were starting school. But to be a prison officer requires a unique set of skills – quite unlike any other job. That ‘jailcraft’ equips officers for the challenges they will face every day. It takes time, and continual learning.

Before joining the Government, I had the privilege of leading a review of prison officer training – speaking to hundreds of officers across the estate. It’s clear we have some decent foundations – but we can do so much more. I want to see more in-depth training that fully prepares officers for the realities of the role, right from the start. 

Greater consistency – with a strong curriculum and clear standards…More local ownership of training…Clear channels of accountability…And a culture of ongoing learning throughout an officer’s career…One that rightly builds pride in this absolutely critical role. I want to push forward with these changes, and I’ll say more about this as soon as I can.

The third element of a good prison is, of course, purposeful activity. Prison education and training has a huge influence on the path offenders choose to take. It’s crucial that we get this right if we are to release better citizens, not better criminals. Yet I’ve seen people leave prison not even knowing how to use a computer.

When we spend so much of our lives - and jobs - online, how are they supposed to get on in the modern world? That’s just one example. There are many others. B
ut the point is clear: when you don’t have the right skills to get a job, slipping back into old habits is all too easy. And the lure of easy cash might feel like the only way to put money in your pocket.

So, it might not come as a surprise that I’m passionate about prison education and training. Training that opens doors – that gives prisoners pride - and real skills that today’s employers want. I’m clear that prison is a punishment. But that’s no reason to stop the one in four working-age people in the UK who have criminal records from getting jobs.

We know that prison leavers are less likely to reoffend if they have a job within a year of release. So, getting them into work doesn’t just cut crime, it boosts our economy too. That’s a win-win we can’t ignore. But for many, the process of applying for jobs can be daunting.

That’s why I’m pleased to see a new partnership - between the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development Trust and the New Futures Network. It will embed HR professionals in EABs…Ensure that prison leavers can access HR advice to support them into work…Provide mentoring for Prison Employment Leads…And help us to create even closer links between prisons and local employers. And, I can testify, former prisoners make great colleagues.

In my experience, they work hard, they turn up on time, and they are trustworthy – because they are so hungry to prove themselves. The amount they can achieve – starting from rock bottom – is nothing short of extraordinary. It’s no exaggeration to say that some of the most accomplished people I know were once in prison. They want to grasp that second chance with both hands. Together - let’s make sure they get it.

Our fourth route to reducing reoffending is by tackling the scourge of drugs in our prisons. As you know so well, drugs undermine rehabilitation, fuel violence, debt, and are a sure path back into crime. Nearly half of prisoners have a history of drug misuse. Many will have addictions when they turn up at your gates, but too many who were clean on the outside are drawn into drugs on the inside. That flies in the face of what we want our prisons to achieve.

The answer is clear. First, we need to stop drugs getting into prison. We can hardly expect prisoners to kick the habit if our jails are a sweetshop for drugs. We know what you are up against. Not least the growing use of drones to smuggle drugs - and the phones that power the illicit market - over your walls…And the increasing threat of synthetic opioids…

We have to adapt rapidly if we are to protect our staff and prisoners. Second, we need prisons to drive demand for drugs down, not up. Purposeful activity is so important here. If prisoners have meaningful ways to spend their time, they’re less likely to turn to drugs through boredom, or distress. Staff training is crucial too. Your teams have to understand drugs, and addiction, so they can make sure prisoners get the right support, and are helped to recover.

Third, prisoners with an addiction need treatment. There is good evidence to show this reduces reoffending – but we also need to make sure they stay in treatment after release. That groundwork starts in prison. 

And fourth – where it’s safe and appropriate - we should be driving more people with a drug problem away from prison and into treatment. That could include greater use of drug and alcohol treatment requirements attached to community sentences, for example.

There are no easy solutions, but I want to work with you to create a system where people leave custody prepared to lead productive, drug-free lives. I know there is innovative work going on out there – and I want to explore how we can replicate that work elsewhere.

As I come to a close, let me say again - this is the beginning of a new journey for our prisons. This Government will rebuild and reform the system. We’ll accelerate the prison building programme, to make sure we have the cells we need. We’ll soon publish our ten-year capacity strategy, setting out how we will acquire new land for prisons, and reform the planning process. And, as you’re aware, we will carry out a review of sentencing - with a focus on how it both protects the public and reduces reoffending.

We’ll soon be in a position to share the terms of reference of that independent review and announce its chair – and I know the PGA will play its full part once it is underway. As I’ve said, change takes time. It also takes stamina. The last Government hardly led by example - 14 Prison Ministers in as many years isn’t a record to be proud of. So I can assure you – it’s very much my intention to stay the course.

I want you to judge me on my actions. When I’m back here next year, and the year after that, let’s see where we’ve got to. I’m fortunate to have started this job with a good working knowledge of prisons, but it’s been humbling to visit some of you recently, and be reminded of the complex and challenging work you do every day.

Thanks to everyone who has taken the time to talk to me so far –

Aled at Holme House…
Pete at Five Wells…
Amy at Downview…
Andy at Wandsworth…
Emily at High Down…
Dan at Preston…
And many, many more…

I should say that getting out into the estate is another of my top priorities…So you can tell me straight - what’s really going on in the system, what you’re up against, and how, together, we can make it better. I hear the last Minister to go to Isle of Wight prison was Anne Widdecombe. So, Dougie, you’ve been forewarned. I’ll be coming down!

Let me finish by saying thank you, again…To you, to your teams, and every single person who keeps the system running – the teachers, nurses, psychologists, and non-operational staff. As leaders, your role goes far beyond managing institutions. You are protecting communities..You are shaping lives…And ultimately, you are strengthening our society.

Thank you.

30 comments:

  1. From BBC website:-

    Scrapping short prison terms is among a number of ideas set to be considered by an upcoming government review of sentencing.

    Ministers are interested in proposals to toughen up community orders as an alternative to jail, to reduce the number of offenders in prisons.

    David Gauke, a former justice secretary and Conservative MP, is the frontrunner to head the work, the BBC has been told by multiple sources.

    The review will be announced later this month and is expected to make recommendations to ministers next spring.

    As justice secretary in 2019, Gauke said there was a strong case for scrapping jail terms of less than six months.

    The BBC has approached Gauke for comment.

    Shabana Mahmood, the current justice secretary, is known to want to toughen community sentences, which could involve strict conditions and punishments but no time behind bars.

    Several government sources pointed to advances in technology, such as sobriety tags monitoring alcohol use, that could be used more widely to detain criminals in their homes.

    One source argued community orders could be tougher than prison because those convicted could not “mong out for 23 hours a day on drugs”.

    Ministers are also exploring international examples of reducing crime in Texas and Louisiana, where prisoners can reduce their sentences by earning credits for good behaviour.

    Officials also pointed to New York, where offenders convicted of drug-related crimes can be sent on a treatment programme. If they complete it, they can have their charges dismissed or reduced.

    It comes as prisons across the country are struggling to deal with overcrowding after the number of offenders behind bars hit a record high.

    The Labour government has been exploring options to relieve the immediate pressure on prisons, and has already released some offenders early to free up space.

    But further emergency measures to stop prisons breaching capacity will be needed next year, sources have told the BBC.

    Ministers had hoped the existing early release scheme would buy them 12 months.

    But the riots this year mean prisons are expected to be full again next summer, before any changes to sentencing can be made.

    In the long term, ministers want to consider sentencing changes that could reduce crime.

    Ending or moving away from short sentences could have a particular effect on the number of women in jail, after the Prison Reform Trust found last year that over half (58%) of jail terms given to women in 2022 were for less than six months.

    Ministry of Justice figures show, external more than half of adults (57%) released from prison sentences of less than 12 months went on to reoffend.

    One Ministry of Justice source said the government would be encouraging the reviewer “to follow the evidence in terms of how sentencing can cut crime”.

    “Prisons are creating better criminals, not better citizens,” the source said.

    A solicitor who was seen as being on the centrist wing of the Conservative Party, Gauke could be viewed as a contentious choice to lead the review.

    In 2019, he made a series of speeches to call for a shift away from short prison sentences and towards punishment in the community.

    But Gauke’s successor, Robert Buckland, said he did not believe abolishing short sentences was the right way forward.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lord Woolf, a former chief justice of England and Wales, told the BBC he thought Gauke would be a “very good person” to lead the sentencing review.

      He said the government should consider launching a public inquiry into the penal system.

      “I think there is ignorance over what prisons can achieve,” he said.

      He wrote a report about the Strangeways prison riot in 1990 and has consistenly highlighted the problems of prison overcrowding since then.

      The retired barrister was one of five former lord chief justices who signed a paper, external that blamed “sentence inflation” for the lack of space in prisons.

      “The public want longer and longer sentences,” Lord Woolf said. “But they don’t know that’s self-defeating and it’s a very expensive policy.”

      Tory leadership contender Kemi Badenoch criticised Labour for "taking short-term decisions and putting the public at risk", adding she wanted to tackle the "root causes" of prison overcrowding.

      Robert Jenrick, the other remaining candidate in the leadership contest, said Labour was showing a "soft-on-crime approach", and repeat offenders needed "massively tougher sentences" to protect the public.

      Other previous justice secretaries - including Ken Clarke - have talked up changes to sentencing, only to be stymied by political opposition or the electoral calendar.

      The previous Conservative government’s attempt to bring in “a presumption that custodial sentences of 12 months or less be suspended” was dropped after the general election was called earlier this year.

      Speaking at Labour’s conference last month, Lord Timpson, the prisons minister, said community sentences need “to be trusted more by the courts” as an alternative to jail.

      He suggested previous prisons ministers had not always followed the evidence on “the best way to stop reoffending”.

      The government has not made any decisions on potential changes to sentencing policy and will not do so until it has considered the recommendations of the review.

      A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “The lord chancellor has confirmed plans to launch a review into sentencing that will focus on protecting the public and reducing reoffending.

      “We will soon be in a position to announce the terms of reference for this independent review and confirm its chair.”

      Delete
  2. glad you put timpson's words up, JB; I was surprised to hear them when LBC radio played the speech live on tuesday... he sounded very comfortable in that room. Not sure his grasp of crim justice goes beyond the cosiness of his chums in the prisons estate... and I'm not sure that this 21st Century labour is anything different to tories of the 80's & 90's:

    "Ministers are interested in proposals to toughen up community orders as an alternative to jail... David Gauke, a former justice secretary and Conservative MP, is the frontrunner to head the work... Shabana Mahmood, the current justice secretary, is known to want to toughen community sentences, which could involve strict conditions and punishments..."

    How many more breaches or recalls can probation squeeze in?

    "Officials also pointed to New York, where offenders convicted of drug-related crimes can be sent on a treatment programme..."

    Anyone remember the DTTO? A potentially good idea that was massively undermined by limited political will & no funding for the treatment or testing providers.

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmpubacc/403/403.pdf

    https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/09627250208553371.pdf

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/426676/Supporting_CO_Treatment_Reqs.pdf

    We remain mired in fear-mongering, political slogans & outright lies:

    “The lord chancellor has confirmed plans to launch a review into sentencing that will focus on protecting the public and reducing reoffending."

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c22d0e5274a25a9140ab3/6717.pdf

    Good night, said Zebedee... "dah-da-da-dah-dah, dah-da-da-dah-dah..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Meanwhile hmpps is celebrating jail time:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/nearly-400-people-already-jailed-following-summers-violent-disorder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hundreds of people who took part in violent disorder during the summer have already been jailed, data published today reveals.

      The rapid action taken across the justice system by police, prosecutors and those working in courts has meant that 388 people have been jailed to date – nearly half (47.5%) of all those who have appeared in court so far.

      In total, over 800 people who took part in violent thuggery have now had an initial court hearing as part of a collective effort across criminal justice agencies to keep communities safe and free from further violence and punish those who took part in the mindless disorder. Of these, almost 500 cases have been completed.

      The data released today shows that between 30 July and 3 October:

      819 defendants have been received by the courts in connection with the public disorder
      817 have already had their first hearing
      477 have been sentenced
      388 people have been sent to immediate custody
      324 cases are still in progress
      Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: 

      The mindless minority who took part in the disgraceful scenes we witnessed this summer were warned they would feel the full force of the law. This data shows that many have already seen the inside of a prison cell and many more face the prospect in future.

      I would like to pay tribute to the dedicated professionals across the criminal justice system who have worked tirelessly to deliver swift justice.

      Delete
  4. Lord Timpson has reiterated Labour's intention to complete the new prisons including emergency powers to over-ride any planning objections. Those places will all be filled. Probation will help fill those new cells. I strongly suspect Timpson isn't the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy who will be ditched at the first unfavourable tabloid headline.
    sox

    ReplyDelete
  5. timpson: "I firmly believe that strong leaders – you – are the single most important element in a good prison... You set the culture… You set those high standards for your teams to follow, and for the prisoners you rehabilitate."


    And the results of those "strong leaders" to date?

    * Adults released from custody or starting court orders had a proven reoffending rate of 33.2%.

    * Adults released from custodial sentences of less than 12 months had a proven reoffending rate of 55.5%.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2022/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2022#reoffending-by-disposal-type

    Its not a new phenomenon either:

    https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FK002023%2F1

    "In the UK, 75% of ex-inmates reoffend within nine years of release, and 39.3% within the first twelve months."

    https://www.bristol.ac.uk/poverty/downloads/keyofficialdocuments/Reducing%20Reoffending.pdf

    "Of those prisoners released in 1997, 58 per cent were convicted of another crime within two years. 36 per cent were back inside on another prison sentence."

    PRT have their say here:

    https://prisonreformtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/prison_the_facts_2023.pdf

    Despite the weasel words of politicians of all hues the "strong leaders", statista (not always reliable) shows:

    1984 - 43,295
    1994 - 48,621
    2004 - 74,657
    2014 - 85,307
    2024 - 87,900

    Ergo, prison works?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh aye, prison works for the multinationals with govt contracts to build, maintain & staff the prisons - and for those whose careers are enhanced with directorships & consultancy posts.

      Its not just a case of "how much money do we want to spend" (anon 11/10 @12:19), its also who do we want to give that money to. Probation is NOT high on the list (although the "excellent leaders" + the IT & staffing agencies haven't done so bad).

      If 12/10 @13:46 doesn't mind an amendment... "Cash for Corporate Chums is king; the little people will just have to put up with being shat on while paying for the privilege."

      ...Let's have a heated debate... or a review:

      * The review will be announced later this month and is expected to make recommendations to ministers next spring.

      BOIIINNNGG!

      Delete
  6. New Government, but the same old attitude towards the Probation Service, we're just not really worth mentioning. I also see the latest pay update with conversations starting between the unions and HMPPS is pointless as they won't agree anything until the Government has set out its thoughts on civil service pay at the end of next April, but they love to remind us about the back dated pay they kindly agreed to and the very, very generous Enhanced overtime pay that no one has been offered as its all down to individual Deps! It'll no doubt soon be worth more to me financially if I consider becoming a prison officer...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The basic, fundamental question Lord Timpson should be asking is
      What do we want our prison service to achieve? What is it purpose?
      What do we want probation services to achieve?
      What is it's purpose?
      It's all been a political football for so long , it's lost its way completely.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. Unfortunately those basic questions will always only be asked within the context of how much money do we want to spend and what will the press and electorate accept, it's always political whether we like it or not.

      Delete
    3. Don't need the word probation it's meaningless today. What we need is proper offender management tagging monitoring and directed supervising for control. The probation option is gone as outdated too personal service and 1 2 1 is is not a desirable spend of officer time. Case direction monitoring conduct whereabouts and job seeking are in fact all easier and holding to account for doing nothing attracts a po warning of self bridle power trip. We lost this battle years ago.

      Delete
  7. We have a so-called labour govt that genuflects to the Quatari bullies who sacked an entire UK workforce then rehired cheap labour.

    Probation will be waiting until the end of time for any kind of meaningful response from these covert tories. Cash is king; the little people will just have to put up with being shat on. Anyone who steps out of line will be thrown under the nearest bus. Sound familiar, probation people?

    "Labour’s push for growth has been dealt an embarrassing blow by the owner of P&O Ferries... In 2022, the company fired 800 staff and replaced them with cheaper foreign agency workers in a practice known as “fire and rehire”... No 10 appeared to blame Ms Haigh personally for DP World’s decision to withdraw... “We continue to work closely with DP World, which has already delivered significant investment in the London Gateway and Southampton ports, to help deliver for the UK economy,”... "

    https://www.aol.co.uk/news/p-o-ferries-owner-pulls-132901449.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. What hope probation?

    hmpps response to hmi probation re-East of England:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6704eea9c71e42688b65f296/East_of_England_Regional_Action_Plan.pdf

    Its staggering - to me at least - that 26/31 of the recommendations made have been agreed, but that none of the incumbent "excellent leaders" have been removed for failing to execute the key aspects of *their jobs*, for example:

    * Ensure domestic abuse and
    safeguarding information is
    complete, and analysed
    sufficiently to inform the
    quality of assessment,
    planning and management
    of people on probation.

    * Ensure all staff receive the
    necessary training to
    undertake their roles.

    * Ensure that strategic
    priorities are clearly
    communicated and
    understood by probation
    practitioners and middle
    managers.

    * Ensure that work is
    undertaken with other
    agencies to manage child
    safeguarding and domestic
    abuse, such as the police
    and children’s social care
    services, to ensure that
    actual and potential victims
    are sufficiently protected.

    My personal favourite:

    * Ensure that people on
    probation have appropriate
    access to interventions and
    services.

    The merry-go-round of failure & catastrophe will never stop until the rotten core of incompetence, ignorance & faux elitism is excised ('scuse the dreadful mixed metaphors). The bullying wastrels at all levels in the chumocracy have to go.

    https://scsrecruitment.tal.net/vx/mobile-0/appcentre-1/brand-0/candidate/so/pm/1/pl/3/opp/178-178-Chief-Probation-Officer/en-GB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. probation is waiting...

      When flynn was in post at least she made it known she was still there, albeit using the medium of policy-speak, every time the bullying hmpps jackboot left yet another imprint on the enfeebled remains of the probation service.

      Does anyone know if the anonymous incumbent chief is able to make a noise? Maybe some pre-recorded phrases like those that scare you shitless as you step on an inanimate doll in the dark:

      *Do you like me?
      *I'm glad we're friends Antonia
      *Let's draw pictures Jim
      *Please take me with you Amy
      *It's time to eat Angela.
      *Will you play with me Michelle?

      Delete
  9. Apologies if this is stretching your boundaries (& maybe your patience) but the rush to ww3 continues to concern me:

    "The United Nations has said Israeli tanks burst through the gates of a base of its peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon as Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the United Nations to evacuate peacekeepers"

    While in no way supporting or excusing violence by any group, I have to grumble about the extremist israeli govt who continue to show no regard for international law, believing they are exempt. An israeli govt minister told bbc world service news this morning that invading & settling Gazan & Lebanese territory was "necessary to ensure israel's survival".

    Clearly that's why they are flattening northern Gaza & starving the population out of exiatence viz-no food or medical supplies have been "allowed" into Gaza for at least 2 weeks.

    And journalists who dared to risk breaking the israeli's "no news" rules have been killed or jailed.

    Meantime, the uk govt & parliament in general seem to be ok with this... why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-israeli-attacks-outnumbered-hezbollahs-five-to-one-our-analysis-finds

      Between 7 October last year and 20 September this year, Israel struck Lebanon five times for every one Hezbollah assault that hit Israel.

      That’s according to FactCheck analysis of conflict data from the US non-profit ACLED.

      And we find these attacks resulted in thirty deaths in Lebanon for every one fatality in Israel.

      Delete
  10. https://www.civilserviceworld.com/in-depth/article/probation-service-is-in-meltdown-according-to-staff

    “It's a really difficult, complicated job,” says Martin Jones, the government’s chief inspector of probation. “I think it’s also under-appreciated because it’s such an invisible job.”

    An analysis of the last 33 reports into every probation service inspected by the government watchdog – HM Inspectorate of Probation – over the last two and a half years reveals the extent of the crisis.

    It shows every service has received a failing grade in that period – either ‘requires improvement’ or ‘inadequate’. Two got the lowest score possible. (Typically services are rated from 1 to either 21 or 27, two received a score or 1, a further five of just 2.)

    Every report found some sort of failure in regards to domestic violence

    The personal toll on probation officers can be devastating. “When you see a colleague crying at a desk, that's not at all unusual in a probation office,” says John, who also tells us about another colleague who developed PTSD and attempted suicide from the scale and intensity of the work before being forced to take ill-health early retirement.

    Some 578 ‘serious further offences’ were recorded last year, a 10% increase on the year before, though still lower than the record figures set during the system’s privatisation.

    Inspectors repeatedly identified understaffing and "unmanageable" workloads across the country, which had left services failing to do basic jobs

    There isn't any money for staff, apparently...

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/home-office-agency-spend-three-times-higher-than-before-covid

    "The Home Office spent well over half a billion pounds on temporary staff in the last two years as it tried to tackle a backlog in asylum applications... The department spent £269.9m in agency fees last year, according to its latest annual accounts. The figure is a slight rise on the £254.2m recorded the year before, meaning well over half a billion pounds has been spent in the last two years."

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-the-probation-service-has-been-working-over-capacity-every-month-since-january-2023

    The probation service for England and Wales has been working over capacity every month since January 2023, FactCheck can reveal.

    Figures obtained exclusively from the Ministry of Justice show the service has consistently been working at around 120 per cent capacity – meaning the average officer has about six days’ work to do in a five-day week.

    Our findings come as the government plans to release around 2,000 prisoners on a single day next week as part of plans to ease overcrowding – which is expected to put even more pressure on the probation system.

    A Ministry of Justice spokesperson told us: “We’ve brought forward planned pay rises by six months meaning entry level frontline staff will receive a bonus of more than £1,000”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “entry level frontline staff will receive a bonus of more than £1,000”

      Entry level?? What about everyone else!!

      Delete
  12. The figures quoted above talk about ‘the average officer.’ There are countless Officer grade staff who don’t have a caseload at all, so if the number of cases is averaged over the number of officers, most will be on far more than 120 per cent

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/probation-instructions-pis

    Index and notes

    This page lists all current probation instructions (PIs). From 2019, all new prison and probation operational policies are published as policy frameworks.

    If the PI you want is not listed here, check the PI index. This document lists every PI issued and includes details of those which have been cancelled, updated or replaced by a policy framework.

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/policy-frameworks-index

    Details

    This record details all prison and probation policy frameworks that have been issued since September 2018.

    ReplyDelete
  15. In case you weren't already under enough pressure to comply with the authoritarian onehmpps:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/exclusion-from-working-for-hmpps-policy-framework


    Details

    This Policy Framework sets out the duties, rules and general guidance on the exclusions process for directly employed and non-directly employed staff across prisons, probation and HQ. This covers in what circumstances exclusion should be considered and what different types of exclusion should be applied. It contains guidance on how a decision to exclude should be reached, what process must be followed and how a decision to exclude can be appealed. The framework also references other considerations which may apply including Loss of Authorisation and DBS barred lists.

    "To support the safety and security of HMPPS... There is a risk that if a person’s employment, contract or relationship has ended (including when someone has left employment someone has resigned while under investigation) at one location within HMPPS, they may seek appointment elsewhere in HMPPS... HMPPS must maintain a register (the ‘Exclusions Register’) of all individuals who are excluded from employment or working in any capacity in any relevant HMPPS role"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They don't want anyone back then .

      Delete
  16. Asking ChatGPT why officers are not allocated the time tasks actually take and if there are legal ramifications for this- something for the unions perhaps:

    Probation officers in the UK are facing serious issues due to unrealistic time allocations for tasks like OASys assessments, which can take 10–12 hours instead of the 2 hours + allocated by management. This has led to extreme pressure, stress, and burnout for staff, raising legal and ethical concerns. Here’s why this is a problem:

    1. Health and Safety at Work Act (1974).
    Employers have a legal duty to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of employees, including mental health. If the probation service is knowingly assigning workloads that lead to stress or mental health problems, this could breach their duty of care.

    The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) outlines that work-related stress is a major workplace hazard, and employers must take steps to identify and reduce these risks. Ignoring the time pressures probation officers face could put the service at risk of legal action for failing to provide a safe work environment.

    2. Employer Liability and Duty of Care.
    Employers must take reasonable steps to prevent harm to employees. If probation officers are suffering mental health problems because of excessive workloads, this may result in a breach of this duty of care. There have been cases where employees successfully sued employers for work-related stress caused by unrealistic demands.

    3. Working Time Regulations (1998).
    Under UK law, employees are entitled to limits on working hours and rest breaks. If probation officers are regularly forced to work overtime without proper compensation or rest due to workload pressures, this could violate the Working Time Regulations.

    4. Mental Health and Discrimination (Equality Act 2010).
    If stress and burnout from unrealistic workloads cause or worsen mental health issues, the employer may be violating the Equality Act 2010, which protects employees with mental health conditions. Employers must make reasonable adjustments to workloads when employees are at risk, or they could face claims of discrimination.

    5. Impact on Public Safety.
    Rushed OASys assessments lead to mistakes, which can put the public at risk, especially when dealing with high-risk offenders. Probation officers are under pressure to complete these critical assessments quickly, increasing the likelihood of errors. This could lead to legal action against the service if a failure to assess an offender correctly results in harm.

    Conclusion.
    While not immediately criminal, the practice of allocating less time than tasks like OASys assessments actually take is legally questionable. It risks breaching health and safety laws, violating employee rights under the Working Time Regulations, and failing to meet the duty of care to staff. In the worst cases, it could result in legal challenges from employees and even pose risks to public safety due to rushed or inaccurate assessments.

    Employers need to take these issues seriously, or they could face significant legal, financial, and reputation consequences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great this was all used to get the original workloads agreements . Napo let it go so I cannot see the current leadership getting any traction way too unskilled.

      Delete
  17. Just been reading the comments in the NAPO magazine on their website dated 17th July re the article, ‘ it’s about pay AND workloads.’
    There was clearly a great deal of anger and contributors were prepared to take industrial action to further their legitimate grievances about the issues.
    Since then, nothing!
    I concluded long ago that NAPO are an irrelevance but am deeply opposed to The Probation Institute promoting themselves as the alternative.
    In the absence of any organised resistance or fightback, the solution appears to be to get out.
    NAPO appear variously to have nothing to say to the members but plenty to say at conferences and in publications.
    I think a position statement would be welcome followed by a plan of action however I won’t be holding my breath waiting for them to organise and direct the abundant frustrations felt by members as they again fail to deliver.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probation Institute is run by academics who are ex probation officers. At least the PI knows a thing or two about probation as opposed to the Napo exec which hasn’t a clue.

      Delete
  18. The robots won’t strike and they are now 80% of the workforce so no chance

    ReplyDelete