Saturday 15 July 2023

Latest From Napo 238

Here we have the latest mailout to members from yesterday and contained in the napomagazine:-

You set the agenda!

Napo’s AGM is a unique opportunity; every member can attend and set Napo’s agenda and policy for the year to come. This is done by the debate and passing (or not!) of motions.

Motions can be proposed by branches, networks or committees . Or by two individual full or Professional Associate Members.

So whether it’s workloads, training, buildings, pay, a policy that worries you, or something else, you decide on what you want to bring to AGM.

It’s time to get writing – a short title and 200 words to explain what you think Napo should be doing over the next 12 months. You’ll get 6 minutes to talk to it at AGM, as well the person seconding the motion and a right of response to those that may have questions for you.

Remember at AGM alongside debating motions, there will be professional sessions, fringe events and time to catch up with old friends and new. Most members have said, upon coming to AGM for a first time, you get to realise, you’re part of something bigger and that you are not alone and on your own.

The deadline for motions is the 16th August 2023 at 12noon. All the information is here at www.napo.org.uk/agm

What about us? Pay Review Bodies’ Recommendations

Following yesterday’s statement by the Prime Minister that the Government are to honour the recommendations from the Independent Pay Review Bodies (IPRB) across a number of sectors, which will see an average increase of 6.5% for Police, NHS Workers, Junior Doctors, Prison Officers, Members of the Armed Forces and Teachers. Napo members across all the employers where we are represented, have already been contacting us to ask if this means better news for them.

The announcement by Rishi Sunak follows weeks of speculation that the Government were to renege on the PBR recommendations and risk a further escalation of the industrial unrest that has been taking place this year. Whilst the Prime Minister’s “take it or leave it” message will go down well with his fast-diminishing number of supporters, it may serve to harden attitudes elsewhere, especially among those trade unions who have been imploring the Government to negotiate in advance of the PBR reports in an attempt to avoid strike action.

Essentially, there are two ways of looking at the situation; one is that it represents a “fair” offer within the current economic climate. The other is that it’s a clear demonstration of panic by the Government , whose strategy to wait out the wave of current industrial action and rely on public disgust has spectacularly failed, just months before a likely general election which may come as early as the Autumn.

That £1500 award

This may also partly explain the rationale behind the £1500 pay award that was announced last month for workers falling within the Civil Service Pay Remit. As we have stated before, this was done without so much as an advance notification to the trade unions. The failure to do so meant that we were unable to influence the way in which this was to be paid and point out the negative impact that this so called “performance bonus” has caused for those members with families who rely on Universal Credit or other benefits to make ends meet. Many members have understandably been in touch to report that you will actually be in a worse financial position than before (so much for a listening Tory government). For those members not in that situation, this may bring some comfort, but the view of Napo’s leadership group is that this should be seen for the cynical ploy that it actually is, and that it won’t win as many friends as the government hopes.

So what’s happening on pay for our members?

In Probation we are in year two of a multi-year pay award, but in view of the dreadful economic situation the joint trade unions have submitted a fresh pay claim of 12% and for an award of at least £2500. Some may think this is unrealistic, but the official inflation figures don’t lie. Moreover, the average award for the majority of Probation Staff in year two of the above deal is around 4% . We have now been invited to a meeting with senior management as promised following the outcome of the IPRB reports and we will bring you news of their response as soon as we can. It would be unfair to raise members expectations, but be sure we will be engaging in these discussions in determined mood.

Our members in the Probation Board Northern Ireland are not covered by the pay arrangements above. Meanwhile, they eagerly await decisions on the negotiated business case for a Pay Modernisation Package, but the developments on public sector pay this side of the water will no doubt be viewed with interest in terms of how a separate pay claim should be constructed alongside our sister union Nipsa. More information on the above will be issued directly by your Napo NI Branch once it is available.

In CAFCASS we are engaging in talks on the joint union pay claim that is broadly similar to the one we have submitted in Probation, but senior management await a formal response from the Treasury and likewise, your union will be referencing the above developments as evidence that an imaginative approach needs to follow on pay which is well behind that in the social work sector across the UK. CAFCASS members should look out for the joint Napo/UNISON meeting taking place next Tuesday.

The above illustrates your unions efforts to campaign for decent pay for all of our members, and in the current climate it’s as good a time as any to approach colleagues who are not a member of a trade union and urge them to join in the struggle to see our members treated with respect and dignity by their employer and this government.

One HMPPS: Lack of Meaningful Consultation

The juggernaut that is the One HMPPS change project is continuing unabated. One HMPPS seeks to make efficiency savings of £37 million at HMPPS HQ. As members will already be aware, Napo (alongside our sister unions – UNISON and GMB) is implacably opposed to this initiative as we believe it will lead to the demise of our Probation identity and culture, and will inevitably result in the assimilation of Probation into the Prison Service.

Your National Officers and Officials have been inundated with a huge amount of documentation, and have been asked to attend meetings at short notice, so that the employer can maintain the façade that they are engaging with the unions on this civil service-led bureaucratic restructure. It is a classic example of the Civil Service shuffling the deck chairs while Probation is sinking under the tidal wave of excessive workloads.

The joint unions have now formally written to the One HMPPS project to put them on notice that we do not agree with their arrangement for consultation through the use of multiple ‘Annex As’. Annex As are used to consult with the unions for normal day to day business between the employer and the Trade Unions. It is not appropriate for use on a major change programme like One HMPPS, which will have far reaching consequences for the Probation Service.

The joint unions have made repeated requests to find a more suitable way to influence and feed into the design of One HMPPS. The employer has responded by insisting that they intend to continue with an approach that is flawed and which does not provide the right environment for any proper meaningful consultation.

Napo will continue to fight for the Probation voice to be heard, and if necessary, we will share our concerns more widely if we do not see a change in approach.

91 comments:

  1. I bet HMPPS are trembling in their boots at the prospect of NAPO bravely threatening to "share our concerns more widely' if Probation continues to be undermined by the Government 🥺🥺🥺

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes this comment made me chuckle at 5.30 this morning.

      Delete
    2. Ian Lawrence Bott: "I'll scweam & scweam until I'm sick - and I can."

      Delete
  2. Why no talk of strikes like all the other services? Why do we just sit back and take it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Because many Probation staff can't or won't do anything else

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No it’s because our unions are rubbish. They’ve allowed the employer to do whatever it wants for years. Unions tell the staff to roll over.

      Delete
    2. Yes same old Napo model pretence and conversation . They are useless. If you want to make change lodge formal workloads dispute get members to protect themselves by real collective action Napo incompetant lead has just been re appointed says all it needs to.

      Delete
    3. The TU aren’t great but we as members need to make the better and hold them to account! The disconnect between the membership and the Exec is huge! We need to be going to our local reps and asking them to get the national reps showing their faces at the offices to hear what’s going on now.

      Delete
  4. When strike action was on the table it was voted against by the majority members. I suspect this was mainly newer practitioners who saw the pay offer as acceptable

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ehh I voted against despite the strong arm approach - that this is the best we can hope for in the circumstances…. Not all NAPO colleagues rolled over.

      Delete
  5. NAPO is promoting itself as a uniquely democratic institution while at the same time not conducting a ballot for the post of General Secretary claiming that candidates did not meet the required criteria.
    How high is the bar if the only person capable of managing the organisation is the same person who has driven it into the ground.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "we are in year two of a multi-year pay award"

    PLUS ...That £1500 award...

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/steps-forward-made-on-pay-following-constructive-discussions-with-unions

    What PCS told its members when the payment was announced:

    "This payment is a one-off £1,500 non-consolidated payment to staff groups subject to the civil service pay remit guidance. It will be taxed as part of your income for 2023-24 and will affect Universal Credit (UC) and student loans... we have been advised that however it is paid it will affect UC... Part-time staff will receive a proportion of the bonus on a pro-rata basis... "

    What did napo say?

    Unison wrote to Simon Case in June seeking clarification:

    "that the offer is in respect of the 2022/23 pay year;

    how the payment would be implemented for part-time and term-time only staff; and

    how it would affect those employees who are members of the local government pension scheme (LGPS), which “treats all pay – including unconsolidated payments – as pensionable pay”.


    "The Prison Officers’ Association has slammed the government for not including certain prison staff in the one-off £1500 cost of living payment announced last week... a select group of civil servants will receive a one off £1,500 cost-of-living payment.

    The payment comes in addition to any pay award given for the fiscal year but will only be awarded to those covered by this year’s Civil Service pay remit guidance — non-senior Civil Service (SCS) workers at government institutions — and non SCS staff in the probation service."


    But now that others have received considerably better offers "the joint trade unions have submitted a fresh pay claim of 12% and for an award of at least £2500"


    "One HMPPS seeks to make efficiency savings of £37 million at HMPPS HQ", hence the voluntary exit scheme that recently closed.

    "we believe it will lead to the demise of our Probation identity and culture, and will inevitably result in the assimilation of Probation into the Prison Service... Napo will continue to fight for the Probation voice to be heard, and if necessary, we will share our concerns more widely if we do not see a change in approach."

    Too late, suckers; its already happened & there ain't no way back now. When you signed off on TR you handed the keys to noms/hmpps on your way out. You failed to protect members during the 2013/4 shaftings. You failed to protect members' interests, including severance pay, once they were in private hands. And then you wanted "unification".

    You got just what you asked for.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Napo members across all the employers where we are represented, have already been contacting us to ask if this means better news for them."

    Which shows how unrealistic napo & their members are.

    You settled on a 3-year deal at around 3.2% annually:

    "Probation workers accept real-terms pay cut following absence of union lead... This comes on top of over a decade of below-inflation pay rises – since 2010, pay for probation staff has risen by just 1% while the cost of living has increased by over 40% across the same time period... "

    In the words of napo:

    "The above illustrates your unions efforts to campaign for decent pay for all of our members"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a lack of leadership and representation that Napo made no recommendation on how members should vote on the 3% pay offer.

      While the ballot returned an overall ‘yes’ vote, over a third of members in Napo and Unison, voted to reject the offer, indicating a willingness to take industrial action. This result, while disappointing, shows what could have been achieved had the unions recommended a reject vote, and built a joint campaign to demand the real pay rise we deserve.

      The unions failed us, not the other way around. No surprise that prison officers will now get a 7% pay rise but probation officers will get nothing.

      Three cheers for probation officers being the little P in #HMPpS and #OneHMPpS.

      Delete
    2. A union is only as strong as its membership.
      NAPO has a membership of 6000 and declining.

      Napo
      Headquarters 160 Falcon Road, London
      Location England
      Members 6000
      Key people Ian Lawrence (General Secretary)

      What percentage of the overall workforce does 6000 represent?
      What percentage of the overall workforce actually belong to any union?

      Delete

    3. hmpps think 30% is a great achievement when it comes to the performance of their excellent leaders (see any probation inspectorate report) & the govt allows them to continue ploughing probation into the ground.

      Delete
    4. “Napo made no recommendation on how members should vote”

      Meaning that a union may well “only be as strong as its membership”, but if that union is led by idiots who cannot give basic representation nor recommendation on key issues, then it makes no difference if there are 6000 members or 60000.

      Delete
    5. “Napo made no recommendation on how members should vote”

      There provides the opportunity to tell the union exactly what you think by voting no to a shit 3% pay offer.
      The majority voted yes and are now stuck with it.
      I agree that Napo are crap, but they are being allowed to be crap by an apathetic membership.
      3% is shit. I dont need a recommendation to know if I want to accept it or not.

      Delete
    6. You pay your subs for a union to represent and lead. Not to say “we make no recommendation”. We attended the briefings, the unions all but encouraged members to take the deal making members believe it was 3% or nothing.

      It’s not about and “apathetic workforce”. Parts of some bigger Napo branches tried to take down the Napo top table over the past few years. They got nowhere.

      Delete
    7. Napo lost a certification officer case for attacking a member unlawfully and Napo lost. No one did anything about investigating the real motives of the union. Just goes to show you.

      Delete
  8. I see the government is now forecasting a sharp rise in female prisoners. What a splendid idea. All that moaning about the gender imbalance in the probation service will be swept aside by locking up more women offenders. Bloody genius…makes you wonder why this government is derided…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cost of living related. It’s already happening.

      Delete
    2. How’s does locking up women relate to “moaning about the gender imbalance in the probation service”?

      Delete
    3. anon 13.36.. I am a unison member and have been in probation for a while now. I believe the mantra of the union or branch is only as good or effective as its members.. dont think I have to dwell on that... however I cannot tell you the last time I seen any union rep/official in my office trying to recruit new members or rallying current members...the place has been awash with new staff equips etc and not one a union member.... before anyone says why dont I recruit I left repping behind maybe 5 years ago, the reason ? ..I had brought up this very issue many times at branch level and all I got was hot air .....now it is no secret that a union is only as strong as its members but when you have known for some time that there is no strength in your membership yet do nothing about it, that's when the unions can be called shite

      Delete
    4. GMB Scoop is the union for senior probation managers. GMB voted 94% accept. Do we know why? Did they benefit more than non-senior grades? Did they encourage non-senior grades to accept the 3% pay deal? Conflict of interest?

      Napo 66% accept / 34% % reject

      UNISON 64% accept / 36% % reject

      GMB SCOOP 94% accept / 6% reject

      Delete
    5. "Probation employers recognise 3 trade unions – Napo, who double as a professional association as well as a union; the GMB / Scoop who represent only members in the old Chief Officer Grades; and Unison."

      https://www.gmb.org.uk/network/public-services-section/probation-noticeboard

      Delete
    6. “Napo, who double as a professional association”

      .. in name only !!

      Delete
    7. GMB is represented historically by an ex cpo or the like. More recently a union officer ex po . They hardly act on any authority and they play up credentials when they have none or any consultation mechanism. Napo use them for collective credibility but GMB remain a farce. Unison conflate our position Napo borrow from them on pr and pay claims but have wider members in grades of all types so as a Group in professional role we will always lose out.

      Delete
  9. Depends on which HMG website you visit:

    HM Prison and Probation Service workforce quarterly: March 2023, says:

    19,850 FTE staff in the Probation Service

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    HM Prison and Probation Service workforce quarterly: March 2023, Updated 22 May 2023, says:

    20,128 FTE staff in the Probation Service

    ReplyDelete
  10. Some wise words from Nitin Sawhney on social media:

    One country invading another is never a good thing… It makes for a volatile, unstable and aggressive world, particularly when sovereign states now have nuclear capability… Yet part of me feels we, in the U.K., were invaded by a hostile force. This government has attacked every value I grew up with of decency and compassion. They have attempted consistently to pass laws to undermine and reconfigure a fair, inclusive society. They have done so whilst promoting their own values of selfishness, greed, ignorance and loathing for anyone vulnerable or disadvantaged. We may not have been invaded by a foreign power… But those at the helm of this country do not wish us well. They pass laws to allow our waters to become riddled with sewage, effectively dance on graves during a pandemic, nepotistically embezzle or lose billions of public funds, empower corrupt mp’s, increase financial disparity, destroy dreams of stable safety and security and encourage bigotry and racism with their idiotic, uncaring policies.

    Invaders normally seek to divide and conquer new lands. This government is the most divisive of my lifetime… We can’t let them conquer whatever beauty we have left. Democracy can work for us. We still have the power to claw back the country they stole...

    Nitin Sawhney CBE (born 1964) is a British musician, producer and composer. A recipient of the Ivor Novello Lifetime Achievement award in 2017, among multiple international awards throughout his career. Sawhney's work combines Asian and other worldwide influences with elements of electronica and often explores themes such as multiculturalism, politics, and spirituality.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This story has echoes of napo & members' regret about voting against strike action & accepting the 3-year pay deal:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66169914

    "Since 6 January 2021, over 1,000 people have been charged over their participation in the riots, and almost half have pleaded guilty. But chatter on online forums and media coverage shows a small but growing number have started to have a change of heart."

    It seems that self-serving chameleonism (is that a word?) is an increasingly popular way of being.

    Remember that johnson bloke who announced his decision to back Brexit in a newspaper column - but also produced a separate draft backing the Remain cause?

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-s-article-backing-britain-s-future-in-the-eu-a3370296.html

    Or worse still, bliar's pursuit of thatcherism?

    "In 2002, twelve years after Margaret Thatcher left office, she was asked at a dinner what was her greatest achievement. Thatcher replied: “Tony Blair and New Labour."

    And here are bliar's own words on the matter:

    “[Thatcher] was immensely kind and generous to me when I was Prime Minister… Politically, certain reforms she made, for example in Trade Union Law…, we kept the basic legal framework… We didn’t renationalise many of state industries that she privatized… I always thought my job was to build on some of the things she had done rather than reverse them… Many of the things she said… had a certain creditability… Whenever I wanted to ask her for advice, she would always give it… in a genuine, spirited way.” {source: BBC News, April 8, 2013]

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anon 10.04 I was by the till of my local BandM bargain store the other day. For those not in the know it is similar to home bargains stores.
    I overheard two fellas with clip boards in hand speaking to the manager. The manager asked why they were here and they said 'We are from USDAW we are here to try and recruit staff members to the union and also speak to our current members to see if they have any concerns. Now if they can do it why cant probation unions ?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Remember this?

    "A thematic inspection of work undertaken, and progress made, by the Probation Service to reduce the incidence of domestic abuse and protect victims - An inspection by HM Inspectorate of Probation, July 2023"

    https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/07/Domestic-Abuse-Thematic-inspection-report-v1.3.pdf

    inspector says:

    1. Publish a domestic abuse strategy for the Probation Service and review progress against it regularly

    hmpps says:

    This recommendation is partly agreed as HMPPS do not
    intend to have separate strategies for different offence types.

    welcome to onehmpps, the one-size-fits-all service.

    In fact they went further & offered a teaser of what's to come:

    "HMPPS set out the overarching strategic direction to
    rehabilitation in the HMPPS Rehabilitation Strategy which is due to be published internally shortly. This strategy sets out a commitment across prisons, probation, and the youth custody estate to create the best conditions for successful rehabilitation, to reduce reoffending and protect the public."




    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1168771/pi-ai-index-2009-current.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  14. ex-R2 dj Ken Bruce gets himself into trouble

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66220016

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken Bruce's Greatest Hits Radio show is being investigated by Ofcom over the station's campaign calling for offenders to be prevented from refusing to attend sentencing hearings.

      The broadcasting watchdog said on Monday it would at look at whether the station had complied with rules around impartiality and accuracy.

      This year's Face the Family petition has been made directly to Parliament.

      It was mentioned by a newsreader on Bruce's show on 13 April. The broadcast also included clips in support of the campaign which directed listeners to a website.

      The petition, signed by more than 13,000 people, was broadcast more than 30 times on the station, calling for new laws to "require offenders to be in court for sentencing, to give victims and their families every chance to witness justice be delivered".

      It was explained that this could involve court and prison staff being "given powers to use reasonable force to get offenders into the dock - as they do to transfer them from a court to prison."

      Ofcom's spokesperson said the watchdog "does not seek to question the merits" of the campaign, which was broadcast more than 30 times on the radio station.

      But they also noted how broadcasters are excluded from expressing views on "political and industrial controversy or current public policy".

      Justice Secretary Alex Chalk this month said he was committed to proposals to introduce legislation so that convicted criminals would have to appear in court for their sentencing.

      Speaking to ITV News, he said he was "looking at what levers are open to us - whether you're talking about physically forcing people to court, or giving people an additional sentence as a result. We are looking very hard at this."

      Delete
    2. "Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said he was "he was committed to proposals to introduce legislation... looking at what levers are open to us... talking about physically forcing people to court..."

      Vote tory, join a security service & get to punch a convicted criminal in the face.

      Delete
  15. Hi Jim. I was looking into a function of the civil service on Glassdoor linked to considering a career move. I was surprised at how chaotic and unprofessional the department sounded, and how low it scored with contributors and thought ‘who would work there?’. I then decided to check out the same for HMPPS - WOW, I should ask ‘why do I work here?’ I am posting here in the hope that senior-SENIOR leaders read and may take note. https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Reviews/HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service-Reviews-E1982182_P2.htm?filter.iso3Language=eng

    ReplyDelete
  16. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66257579

    "The top official at the Treasury who was sacked days after Liz Truss became prime minister received an exit payout of £335,000.

    Sir Tom Scholar was fired after Ms Truss pledged to change "Treasury orthodoxy" during the Tory leadership campaign last year.

    His dismissal was criticised by former officials, who said it was an attack on the impartiality of the civil service.

    At the time, the Treasury thanked Sir Tom for his "dedicated service".

    The details of Sir Tom's severance payment for "loss of office" were included in the Treasury's annual report and accounts for 2022-23.

    The figures show Sir Tom's total pay for 2022-23 was more than £550,000 ($700,000), including salary and pension benefits."


    But when probation staff were callously decanted into private ownership & then discarded, there was no generosity with their severance pay; in fact the nationally agreed formula was ditched & privateers stole up to 60% of staff entitlements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Grossly wrong. Every member of staff who opted chose agreed accepted whatever sub standard offer deal adjustment variation reduction made their choice. They accepted agreed took the offer made no case offered no resistance . They were responsible for undermining the terms by acceptance. Their rush made it impossible for us to protect those who would have fought and made the redundancies a compulsory issue. These agreements ruined the case for a fight because those who took a deal did not fight can only be regarded as stupid. Stop complaining you guys sold everyone out cowardice foolish what have you just plain self interest and clearly I have no sympathy for their reduced terms shafted their own pensions. Earning yourselves a reduction as you volunteered . No conscripts just agreements so stop complaining they agreed and that's why they lost money.

      Delete
    2. "Stop complaining you guys sold everyone out" - welcome to post-TR Probation Service.

      From the contract which was signed by employer & unions alike:

      "the commercial contracts will specify that, other than where more beneficial terms exist, where voluntary redundancy is offered, the enhanced terms set out at Appendix B should apply to any member of staff in a CRC employed by a Probation Trust on 31 May 2014"

      Compulsory redundancies were *not* required to trigger entitlement to the EVR. Many of those who put their hands up were led to believe that EVR was the deal on offer, as brokered by both MoJ & the unions. When the CRCs were sold & contractors reneged on those commercial contracts, both the employer & the unions pulled down the shutters; the MoJ said it was nothing to do with them & the unions failed to take the CRCs to task for breach of contract.

      So please direct your spite & bile elsewhere.

      Delete
    3. Napo said: "Napo's position is that we do not believe the proposed job cuts are necessary or safe, but if some losses are unavoidable they must be on the terms agreed within the national agreements and replicated within the service level contracts. It is morally indefensible to offer staff lesser terms for leaving than those that their colleagues received in tranches 1 and 2 of the early departure schemes... The unions anticipated this eventuality, and I expect us to have finalised our plans to consult with our members on this despicable offer and the conduct of the CRC owners and test the water about the willingness for industrial action. As I said to members in Northumbria this week, it may soon be time to step up to the plate and use the only language that outfits like Sodexo really understand... "

      So to summarise napo's stated position in 2015:

      "if some losses are unavoidable they must be on the terms agreed within the national agreements... The unions anticipated this eventuality... it may soon be time to step up to the plate and use the only language that outfits like Sodexo really understand"

      To summarise the reality of napo's intervention:

      " "


      600 job cuts proposed by Sodexo (and others in other CRCs) were most definitely identified in the companies bids, otherwise how did a substantial £80million magically appear from the Cabinet Office Modernisation Fund that had been paying out since 2014? Those job cuts were integral to the bidders' interest & subsequent profitability.

      It was a scam to crash through a politically ldeological experiment at the expense of anyone who dared to challenge or oppose it. Those who offered assistance were well rewarded.

      Delete
    4. Getting the language right is important in contracts. There is no breach when the wording says should. It does not state has to will do must. It's a carefully worded let out that Napo did not appreciate when they rushed it to members pre Christmas week. Members who opted for their changed offer did exactly what's said sold themselves short and the rest of us out. The employers acted like they should or at least most likely way to behave go for the money and who cares when the foolish signed up. After all these are intelligent people and will know what they are doing.

      Delete
    5. Compulsory full payments were deliberately not offered by crcs they did offer a voluntary early exit which was separate from the national agreement and it was this route that people took and lost out on protection of the arrangements.

      Delete
    6. Exactly what I have been saying. Staff wanted to go but were told there are no compulsory cuts but here is a compromise the private companies are offering . So foolishly they took it than work on or force the soditco to compulsory cuts. That's the strength of the crap messaging Napo gave out in numbria. Cowardly show off reps but no talent or ability to get staff to hold their nerve and fight on.

      Delete
    7. "Getting the language right is important in contracts. There is no breach when the wording says should. It does not state has to will do must. It's a carefully worded let out that Napo did not appreciate when they rushed it to members pre Christmas week."

      So let us be clear. If that is true, who is responsible for policing the commercial contracts agreed & signed off by by employer *&* unions on behalf of the union members?

      Is it the employer? Someone who might have a hidden agenda & has no loyalty whatsoever to union members?

      Is it the union members, who pay subs to a union they expect will look after their best interests & have no right of access to or right to sign-off on commercial contracts?

      Or is it the union/s who take members' subs, accept salaries & claim to look after their members' interests when signing off on commercial contracts involving transfer of members' employment?

      "Members who opted for their changed offer did exactly what's said sold themselves short and the rest of us out."

      No. Members went with what they thought they knew was valid, what they were initially told was available & what they believed they were entitled to because others had previously pocketed the same.

      MoJ had liability but cleverly avoided misleading parliament because Grayling refused to address the issues (of *his* making) & Selous (his junior minister) only ever gave written answers. Their liability lies here: "While we have no plans to reclaim any monies allocated to CRCs from the Modernisation Fund, we have robust contract management arrangements in place to ensure that they are used for the purposes for which they were provided. Contract management teams are in place in each Contract Package Area to oversee each CRC operation."

      There is no evidence whatsoever that any such "robust contract management" was ever exercised for any reason, let alone for the (mis)use of the generous Modernisation Fund monies.

      The unions claim they had "anticipated this eventuality" but did NOTHING to attenuate the actuality. You yourself say "It's a carefully worded let out that Napo did not appreciate when they rushed it to members".

      The ruling of the Certification Officer should have been requested.

      But we dance on the head of a pin. The CRCs no longer exist, the money has disappeared, the MoJ don't give a fuck, the Certification Officer has a headache, hmpps is "at one" with itself & those who are trapped within the "probation service" are trapped in one of Dante's infernal circles.

      As I have stated before, I was approached by a Sodexo CRC ceo in a remote stairwell & told in no uncertain terms that if I didn't take the severance then I would be "managed out within weeks & we'll make sure you leave with nothing".

      So once again, please direct your ill feeling, your insults & your anger towards those who were paid & expected to look after members' best interests & advise them accordingly, NOT at those who were pushed or jumped.

      I know I was not the only member of staff to have such a one-to-one 'off-the-record' warning.

      Delete
    8. to @13:28 - for fuck's sake... read the text. Compulsory redundancy/severance was irrelevant. The commercial contracts spoke of "where voluntary redundancy is offered, the enhanced terms set out at Appendix B should apply to any member of staff in a CRC employed by a Probation Trust on 31 May 2014"

      The CRCs wrote to staff in July 2015 stating that job losses were coming & asked for volunteers. The reduced severance packages were revealed at a later date, which meant many put their hands up expecting the EVR rates to apply.

      Why is there a desperate need to patholgise & victimise those who were hoodwinked by (primarily) Sodexo & let the CRC owners + MoJ off the hook?

      Napo fucked up. They tried to claim they "were on it" but they weren't. They whinged to the MoJ but they were ignored. Their next strategy was to retreat into their shell & refuse to engage until it was too late.

      Delete
    9. Arh I see . I get slated here because I point out contractually the employers offer a new deal as a non compulsory measure and people take the deal. Those under 55 suffered more as pension hit a loss. Those over 55 took a vr deal and pensions still reduced as it was not compulsory. In my area many managers jumped at the transfer and took full trust given rate. In the CRC they reduced the offer but opened the access to all staff so lots of under 55 pensions not applicable took the money even thought it was well short and ignored pension issue. In one case not my are staff member took the deal against union advice. Foolishly later on tried to claim legally pension entitlement but it was not taken up as having any prospect because it was an agreement made separately.
      Post all of this ongoing there were many hard core members who fought and worked on knowing that compulsory was the only protection. CRC were never going to award voluntary routes they openly said the contracts were not worth it . In relation to the contract managers in a few cases two of these came from the counties they were employed in . A po and a pso believe it. They both chosen for the roles because of their excellent capabilities and talents for not appreciating how incompetant and pathetically useless they were in their day jobs. So excellent contract managers then. The CRC was lawless on disciplinary issues sickness management and office space.
      In a similar way conversation like yours with a suggested to work people out route was common place and there to encourage waverers. In my view anyone listening to that and not immidiatly saying do your best then tosser is a foolish coward. Buckling when they could actually do very little to rid staff in this way without paying full evr is what needed protecting . Unions Napo especially did all it could to avoid challenging the national agreements. In fact the GS conceded when a single branch took the matters to dispute. I know it went to joint secretaries and all the way onto acas. That same branch beat Napo at the certifications officer. All said when agreements were sealed outside of what was published your on your own . Any threats as you claimed should have been the subject of immediate intimidation claim. I suspect like so many buyers remorse will be hurting now every pay day on a lot less than entitled had you fought.

      Delete
    10. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2016/feb/23/privatisation-probation-service-stressed-job-cuts

      According to Gill Kirton, professor of employment relations at Queen Mary University of London, privatisation on this scale has slipped through under the radar because it’s not glamorous and most of the public have little contact with probation services.

      https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/30/probation-officers-face-redundancy-in-plan-to-replace-them-with-machines

      March 2015: Martin Graham, the chief executive of the Sodexo CRC covering Norfolk and Suffolk, told his staff to expect a 34% staffing reduction, in an email on Friday: “I’m sure many of you will be shocked by such a figure but you need to remember that this figure is dependent on being able to deliver all the efficiency savings.

      “Whatever the final agreed figures, however, it is clear that we will need to make significant staff reductions over the next weeks and months. Some of these will probably have to be compulsory redundancies.”

      Napo says similar emails have gone out from Sodexo chief executives in South Yorkshire (36% job losses), Cumbria and Lancashire (30%), Northumbria (30%) and the CRC covering Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire (30%). A similar figure is expected in the remaining Sodexo company covering Essex. The [Sodexo] job losses are expected to exceed 700 in total.

      napo: "we anticipated this eventuality"

      also napo: "When we met with Sodexo earlier this year they told us there would be no reductions in workforce."

      sodexo: "The private company has also told staff that they do not intend to honour an enhanced voluntary redundancy scheme which had been agreed between Grayling and the unions"

      also sodexo: "in relation to the enhanced voluntary redundancy scheme the company was complying with the national agreement negotiated between the unions and the national offender management service."
      ________________________________________

      Its hard to comprehend the extent of the lies, the misdirections, the arrogance, the callous disregard & utter contempt for staff.

      Delete
    11. "In fact the GS conceded when a single branch took the matters to dispute. I know it went to joint secretaries and all the way onto acas."

      And that is exactly what should have happened on a national scale, organised & led by the GS. It should not have been down to the fact a single branch was able to fight courtesy of one charismatic &/or stubborn branch rep - ALL branches should have been enabled to fight & their members empowered to support the branches.

      Individuals were hung out to dry by bullies. To label them as cowards & foolish is simply compounding the bullying they experienced.

      Me? I was burnt out. Crispy, carbonised, gone, beyond useful. I fought hard in my area, I took independent legal advice when the union failed to answer any of my requests for assistance & I was hung out to dry, not least when a local union rep I discussed the bullying & threats with simply advised me to take the money & leave. I would love to have had the support of a branch taking matters to acas.

      Others had far more complex situations & personal decisions to deal with but I would never brand them as cowardly, foolish or treacherous.

      If the unions had done their job properly people might have felt supported & had the strength in numbers to take a stand.

      Buyer's remorse? No. Certainly not in light of the direction of travel that probation services have been taken.

      Angry at the duplicity, the dishonesty & the shit-throwing? Yes.

      Delete
    12. I am not unsympathetic to what you have expressed but you took legal advice it went nowhere. The catalogue of evidence for the fighting is well published in this blog. I searched back and the thrust of it was po only voted for a PO. Ignoring the peril that has befallen probation the tenacious rep or few who had to fight Napo were sold out and as it says in this blog you get what you asked for. I accept many reps were just not up to the task but it was in fact the GS and the chair naive beyond belief. Chosen by the POS for their own demise. This blog has all the warnings yet no one listened. Despite all this the tool for a victory are still in place yet your leadership in Napo are incredibly of the lowest talent.

      Delete
    13. Yea and what's mental is they just reappointed him no vote no choice .

      Delete
  17. Seen on social media this weekend. Thought it might provide useful for some?

    * Peter Drucker once famously said, "The bottleneck is always at the top of the bottle." As a leader or manager, when something isn't going to plan, the first step is to look into the mirror.

    (British Library says: "Drucker was, by common consent, the founding father of modern management studies.")

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probation managers never look at themselves. Too busy blaming those they manage.

      Delete
  18. Interesting how quickly language & opinion changes as events move into the past tense; now we have MoJ "officials" referring to the poor-performing CRCs & the need to act fast to prevent prolonging the agony of poor performance by the once-upon-a-time darlings of probation reform:

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/news/article/aggressive-probations-service-timetable-caused-unnecessary-pressure-on-staff

    The speed at which the Ministry of Justice renationalised outsourced probation services “caused unnecessary pressure" on staff, a think tank has said.

    Existing caseload pressures were exacerbated by staff shortages, with CRCs freezing recruitment for up to three months prior to unification to minimise the costs of hiring and then moving additional staff over to the MoJ

    On the other hand, the report accepted that delaying the transition would have kept the poor-performing CRCs in place for longer. Officials had advised ministers at the time the deadline was set that delaying the merger would “prolong the agony” of poor CRC performance.


    But further disaster awaits...

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/news/article/dwp-home-office-moj-and-defra-launch-1bn-tender-for-shared-services-tech-providers

    Four of the biggest departments have opened bidding for a decade-long £1bn-plus contract to cover the provision of cloud software platforms and system integration services as part of government’s ongoing shared services drive.

    ReplyDelete
  19. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/basic-housing-to-keep-offenders-off-streets-and-cut-crime

    "Up to 12,000 prisoners in England and Wales at risk of being released homeless will be offered temporary housing for up to 12 weeks as part of the Community Accommodation Service scheme...

    ...Between July 2021 and January 2023, statistics show that the proportion of offenders who had somewhere to stay on the first night of release from prison was 7.6 percentage points higher in regions with this service compared with those without...

    ...This support will be underpinned by strict supervision from the Probation Service. Offenders who are in breach of their licence conditions can be returned to prison...

    ...The scheme, which was initially launched in July 2021 and piloted successfully in 5 Probation Service regions..."

    Erm, hang on...

    ... if it was so successful, why is there NO data or evidence [beyond the sole example of Janet] as to what happened to those subject to the scheme beyond the 12 weeks. How many found permanent accommodation? How many have reoffended since being part of the pilot scheme? How many were recalled? How much has been spent already?

    Its TR/NPS/CRC/unification all over again - politically motivated, publicly funded smoke-&-mirrors; lying by omission; pre-election bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  20. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/improving-resettlement-support-for-prison-leavers-to-reduce-reoffending.pdf

    In 2022-23, as at 31 March 2023, 97% of prisons were rated as ‘not sufficiently good’ or ‘poor’ for ‘purposeful activity...

    ... none have been rated ‘good’ for ‘rehabilitation and release planning’ in 2022-23, as at 31 March 2023

    "In 2021 HM Inspectorate of Probation changed the methodology it used to assess probation services and no longer reports on resettlement services specifically... Therefore, inspection ratings pre- and post-unification are not directly comparable."

    Very clever.

    Ah, but wait... is this the good news we were asking for?

    Between 2021-22 and April 2022 to February 2023, there was a:
    • one percentage point decrease in the proportion of prison leavers housed on the first night of release, from 87% to 86%;
    • one percentage point increase in the proportion of prison leavers in settled accommodation three months after release, from 75% to 76%

    So the pilot scheme might have had some positive impact? Kind of, but its complicated by the hmpps-preferred mobile goalpost system:

    "Between April 2022 and January 2023... Only two probation regions out of 12 met targets for prison leavers being housed on release (Greater Manchester; Kent, Surrey and Sussex) and only one met its target for prison leavers being in settled accommodation after three months (Wales)."

    "In July 2021 HMPPS expanded its accommodation services by launching a Community Accommodation Service Tier 3 (CAS3) service in five probation regions. Suppliers provide up to 84 nights of accommodation and individual support for prisoner leavers and offenders leaving approved premises or bail accommodation who are at risk of homelessness and accept a placement. Due to the broader range of offenders who can accept placements in CAS3 accommodation, outcomes data are not directly comparable to regional accommodation targets for prison leavers."

    The availability of easier-to-access sponsored CAS3 accommodation provision gives an obvious result:

    • those housed on the first night of their release was 7.6 percentage points higher in CAS3 regions versus non-CAS3 regions

    but after the 84 nights are up...

    • those accommodated at three months following their release was 0.7 of a percentage point lower in CAS3 regions versus non-CAS3 regions.

    So its yet more short-termism, hence the govt have wheeled it out now in the run up to the 2024 gen.election.


    Now please turn to Page 41

    Figure 11
    The Probation Service’s percentage point difference from Civil Service People Survey median scores, 2022
    The Probation Service scores lower than the civil service median scores on all but one survey theme

    ReplyDelete
  21. Kit Malthouse, March 2022:

    "HMPPS launched a new transitional accommodation service providing up to 12 weeks accommodation and support for those leaving prison at risk of homelessness. The service was initially launched last July in five probation areas in England. By 2024-5, we will spend £200m per year to reduce reoffending, including expanding the provision to support the thousands of people, male and female, across England and Wales who leave prison each year without accommodation.... The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) launched their Accommodation for Ex-Offenders (AFEO) scheme on 28 July 2021 to support offenders at risk of homelessness into private rental tenancies. Overall, this financial year, £13 million has been allocated to 87 schemes across 145 local authorities. "

    And look what they achieved:

    Accommodation on Release statistical release to March
    2023 (moj ad hoc data sheet):

    "The proportion of persons released from custody who were housed at the point of release decreased by 2.4 percentage points to 86.3% between April 2022 and March 2023. This is a decrease of 2.7%."

    "The proportion of persons released from custody who were housed at 3 months from their release decreased by 0.2 percentage points to 75.5% between April 2022 and March 2023. This is a decrease of 0.3%."

    ReplyDelete
  22. What the govt said:

    Rob Butler Conservative Aylesbury Commons
    Answered on 19 October 2022

    "Since the publication of the action plan, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) has committed to increase capacity across the Approved Premises estate by 200 beds. To date, we have delivered more than 152 beds with the full expansion on track to be delivered by March 2024. Additionally, our new Community Accommodation Service Tier 2 (CAS-2), (formerly known as Bail Accommodation and Support Services), will increase spaces by a further 300 beds over the next 3 years.

    The Community Accommodation Service Tier 3 (CAS3) offers temporary accommodation for up to 84 nights to prison leavers who would otherwise be homeless. It can be used as ‘move on’ provision from Approved Premises as well as for prison leavers at risk of homelessness.

    HMPPS has also retained the Homeless Prevention Teams as a permanent feature to develop relationships with local authorities and other strategic partners in order to embed and expand housing options for prison leavers."

    Two Q's hmpps might like to answer and then they might have a better chance of spending our money wisely.

    If there are approx 1,000 people released from prisons across England & Wales each week, then:

    Q1. How many are homeless at the point of release?
    Q2. How many need accommodation on release?

    ReplyDelete
  23. a lot more than you are planning to build

    ReplyDelete
  24. Good to see Greater Manchester Police covering themselves in glory. As a police force they are as rotten as the Met. Mr Malkinsons case also draws attention to the complicity of the Probation Service who fell back on the tired refrain “denial”. This is a truly appalling case and one that should hold a mirror to the dreary professionalism of a service that spouts platitudes a plenty, and yet understands little about human behaviour. I sometimes wonder if society would be better off without the probation service. It offers little even as it’s failing miserably. Despite what others have said probation training has always been mediocre. Drifting between various theories with little or no evidence about their effectiveness. A magpie in many respects that nicks bits from psychology and whatever golden theory is being trailed around the corner. Cognitive behaviour, motivational interviewing, transactional analysis (for the older officers), even mindfulness was being dredged up at one point. All clap trap and even when not, used with no evidence base. Truly the jack of all trades but masters of none.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed have to agree with you don't forget the new and boring dissonance instead of saying no. Over 3 decades of probation swim to whatever current direction came. The staff direction is always of control or wet hand outs to perverts and violence. The conduct of the cootes bank is like probation. We did wrong but we are staying. It all needs to go and a rethink with people who make objective decisions not the personal investments of self grandiose we are used to.

      Delete
  25. How might the Malkinson case impact upon the notion of working with & attitudes towards "sex offenders in denial"?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Well we got the £1500, less tax and other deductions. When we getting the £33,000 remaining for the other 22 years since the Probation Service stopped paying cost of living linked incremental pay rises?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Modern probation service celebrates receipt of the hmpps £1500 bung

      Delete
  27. "They don't charge guilty people, they only charge innocent people."

    In terms of a mean-spirited grasping desperate need to avoid fully acknowledging the system ever gets anything wrong, could this be the uk's finest hour?

    "The maximum payment in cases where someone has been in jail for more than 10 years is £1m... The Ministry of Justice said deductions from compensation were made when there had been "substantial savings" made on living costs while a person was in custody.... "

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66324801

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lousy million that's not enough the guy has been robbed of his mind his life freedoms and love. A mill is nothing in this cost of living inflation nation. Disgusting Tories .

      Delete
  28. For those going to festivals this summer please be aware of changes stealthily brought about by the Home Office, in particular that on-site harm reduction arrangements are now a police anti-drug enforcement operation.

    Previously, independent festivals have tended to use charity The Loop, whose professional volunteers have been able to test without a licence due to agreements with local police and councils... the Home Office has recently made changes to its rules.

    "Sadly, very regretfully, the Home Office have reinterpreted the rules and they have decided that that's not something we are allowed to do any more"

    An anti-drugs operation is being enforced by Cumbria Police, using sniffer dogs and officers carrying out sweeps of the grounds and surrounding areas.

    The force, which has been working with organisers, said it would be conducted "regularly" until the festival ends.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-66325033

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice work the filth criminalise everyone it can instead of any progressive policies. Drug buddies safety centres social care. Nah fu** that lets nick em. While we are at let's say nothing about all our own bent ranks and suspended chief of police for sex allegations. Police are core rotten UK. Ask the poor soul locked up for 17 years. Anti corruption these days means anti police sadly.

      Delete
  29. “The tired refrain denial” 00:10, well what do we do? I only work with those who have been sentenced by the Court so I cannot second guess guilt or innocence, that it not the responsibility of Probation at all. If someone maintains denial that is simply what they are telling us and we must reflect this. Our jobs are becoming impossible as it is, but to imply that we even can detect and spot innocence in those convicted is complete nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Totally agree with 06:32

    ReplyDelete
  31. Spot the difference between these two phrases: “Mr A remains in denial”; “Mr A denies that he committed the offence”. The issue becomes problematic when denial in itself removes the chance of future freedom. Denial has no bearing on risk management we just pretend that it does.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Or put another way, 20:32, “(s)he continues to protest her/ his innocence” so, we don’t have to use the word denial at all.

    ReplyDelete
  33. i'm hmpps, i'm hmpps, i'm sure i am i know i am... and so does hmpps

    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/creepy-rise-bossware

    There’s been a surge in mechanisms that facilitate location tracking (increased by 45 percent), video/camera monitoring (increased 42 percent), document scanning (increased 26 percent), and attendance tracking (increased 20 percent).

    “One of the most prevalent modes is real-time monitoring—90 percent of these tools can track activity real time, so an employer can get a list of everything you've done that day—which files you’ve opened up, messaging platforms you’ve used and sites you’ve visited”

    HR analytics tool Perceptyx, for example, uses a range of variables to decipher a vulnerability score that an employee might leave the company or unionize.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's bad no doubt Napo will agree it's use. I bet they wouldn't want it though. Sitting at home all paid up and free money for nothing.

      Delete
  34. Salary – £36,140 (includes £2,000 market supplement)
    HMP Feltham – Feltham, Middlesex
    Prisoner officer starting pay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Almost middle spo money for turning keys ffs. A bit of early shift work that no way sees our hours or stress levels and the go home by 8pm latest. It's a joke .

      Delete
    2. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/28/serious-failings-contributed-to-babys-death-in-12-hour-lone-prison-birth

      Rianna Cleary, who was 18 at the time, gave birth to her daughter Aisha alone in her prison cell at HMP Bronzefield, in Surrey, on the night of 26 September 2019. The care-leaver was on remand awaiting sentence after pleading guilty to a robbery charge.

      The inquest into the baby’s death heard that Cleary’s calls for help when she was in labour were ignored, she was left alone in her cell for 12 hours and bit through the umbilical cord to cut it.

      Bronzefield is operated by Sodexo Justice Services: "At HMP Bronzefield, we run the full prison operations... our regime offer caters for everyone and outcomes for women are good in all areas."

      They omit to say that, actually, they don't give a fuck.

      https://www.inquest.org.uk/aisha-cleary-inquest-closes

      https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/nov/22/hmp-bronzefield-baby-death-prison-births

      On at least four occasions in this period, women held at the privately run Surrey prison have given birth in distressing and potentially unsafe circumstances, including one woman who gave birth in her cell and another who was left in labour at night-time supported only by another pregnant prisoner.

      Report to Prevent Future Deaths (Regulation 28) concerning the death of Ms Kirsty Walker who died whilst under the care of HMP Bronzefield on 27 September 2015.

      https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/hmp-bronzefield-prisoner-repeatedly-self-15347684

      Delete
    3. 12.17 and 19.31 - prison officer pay is £24,067 to £25,342. SPO is £37,909 to £42,251.

      Delete
    4. Well something is wrong with these posters figures. Which is it.

      Delete
  35. Looks like the new order of probation staff are only interested in the money these days; so many issues of concern regarding practice & policy yet all I read here is a celebration of the hmpps pay-off or squabbling about whether prison or probation staff receive better pay.

    Cost of living worries & the greed-economy is real for many, but does it merit setting aside any discussion of professional issues? Or perhaps its true that TR & onehmpps have finally achieved what politicians have hankered after for years, i.e. the dissolution of probation as a profession?

    Seems like they've replaced the independent-minded & the curious with hordes of simple serpents tethered by process, frozen by fear & controlled by rhino-skinned wannabes.

    My heart is heavy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your a bit late it's been like this for years. The evaluation over jobs receives grossly nasty attacks that any non po role as worth less pay. This comes from your lot independent minded curious are also sniping snobbish selfish experts. The argument only po grade has all the entitlement to manage all the posts is ridiculous. This blog has been loaded for years to po status. Yet the I intelligence of this collective herd has been to bleat on its self entitled professional status. Well this pathetic stupidly has held us all back and depressed wage leverage. The argue professionalism without illustrating what this is in practice. Because none of you know. Allowing yourselves the decline of psr to verbal reporting . The use of oasys in total assesment the lack of coordinated understanding and self imposed naval gaze has seen the probation strength as real offender based public service gone. We are a monitoring process so dumb that arguing over pay for a crap job is all that gives the monotony of the job some hope for a better reward in this useless role. It the POS that pushed us up this cul sac because your just not as clever as you all think you destroyed our social function. 10 of 10 for pathetic weakness

      Delete
    2. “Looks like the new order of probation staff are only interested in the money these days”

      Yes well we can’t feed ourselves on PI’s and 7 minute briefings. If we’re “tethered by process” then I cannot think why you’d expect different!

      Probation was finished as a profession when it was sold to private companies in 2014 and probation directors rolled out the changes.

      Delete
    3. I’ve an idea. Get rid of the probation service lifers like you and then we won’t have to hear this type of ageist rose tinted bollocks about your amazing “best practice” that never really existed.

      Delete
    4. Stats to break anyone's heart:

      "88% of immediate custodial sentences proposed in PSRs resulted in that sentence being given in the year ending March 2023, representing the highest concordance between sentence proposed and sentence given."

      THE HIGHEST CONCORDANCE RATE EVER! You've certainly earned your £1500 bung.

      "notable increases under COs were mental health requirements (by 102% to 506)... Under SSOs [there were] notable increases mental health requirements (by 73% to 252)"

      But in order to obfuscate, confuse & discombobulate anyone trying to draw comparisons:

      "Future probation statistics... We are starting the process of transitioning from legacy systems to more modern data processing methods... we anticipate publishing probation data (covering the period up to the end of June 2023) in October 2023, as planned, but then there will be a pause in publishing these statistics for January 2024, with the final two quarters of 2023 to be published in April 2024."



      https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/offender-management-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2023/offender-management-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2023

      Delete
  36. Anon 21.41 you annoy me , as much as I like to value probation principles, I and i suspect most people would not do the job if we didnt get paid...? is it too much to ask to be paid fairly ? and this pointed out when we are clearly not for a very long period of time ?

    When I grew up if you worked with people e.g. eachers , nurses etc you were well paid and well respected. Something happened and someone somewhere, perhaps you anon, decided that these people must like other people so let them get on with it we dont have to pay them so much.

    Evidenced by the average machine operator digger , bus driver etc now paid better than the above.

    So get off the high ground you inhabit and see the bigger picture, you buffoon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know who's or what is being said to who but from an ex offender perspective what probation had many years ago was valuable then it was brilliant and the people made a difference it was core values . Now its toast and I have seen the change to the worse. Anyone getting out of jail or on any type of probation is of no use to anyone deal with the facts .

      Delete
    2. Thank goodness, @19:23 - someone has finally dared remind us what we're supposed to be paid to do.

      Delete
  37. Only losers in probation teachers have had a 11% pay rise in two
    Years reflect on that

    ReplyDelete
  38. Gee, thanks for the feedback.That went down well.

    So what have I learned?

    * your lot independent minded curious are also sniping snobbish selfish experts
    * Yes well we can’t feed ourselves on PI’s and 7 minute briefings
    * Get rid of the probation service lifers like you and then we won’t have to hear this type of ageist rose tinted bollocks about your amazing “best practice” that never really existed
    * Anon 21.41 you annoy me...So get off the high ground you inhabit and see the bigger picture, you buffoon

    Do not fear, angry mob, I am no longer among you. You'll be pleased to hear I was tarred, feather'd & thrown overboard years ago.

    After a fifteen year career elsewhere I took on part-time & voluntary work relating to probation tasks, funded a three year full-time degree with placements which incorporated a probation qualification. I then undertook a year's work as a 'first year officer' & finally received my 'badge'. I continued my professional development & learning for the next thirty years, during which:

    * I was a persistent thorn in the side of "the centre" aka noms/hmpps/senior management
    * I fought to keep report writing & a proactive court presence as keystones of the profession
    * I fought for recognition of the value of all grades of staff within an independent professional agency
    * I was active within the union & participated in all forms of industrial action to try to prevent the service being destroyed
    * I was actively involved in trying to shape the development of practice to prevent the dilution of role boundaries such that no-one would be thrown under whatever bus happened to be passing (e.g. SFOs etc)
    * Over the years I saw probation pay & professional status rapidly decline in relation to other sectors
    * I didn't fit the template that noms/hmpps wanted

    And so I was one of however many who failed to prevent TR, CRCs, unification & zombification. Sorry, but I tried. At least I did that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And to be fair, honest & open: @19:23 on 1/8/23 has exposed me for the navelgazing fuckwit I've become... I'd like to think that my professional focus was on those sent to be assessed &/or 'rehabilitated' but it seems I've been hoist by my own myopic distractions.

      My humble apologies to all of those I worked with between 1985 & 2015. I'm hoping there are a fair few whose experience was positive, e.g. those who didn't go to gaol & made good, those who were diverted to a suitable hospital & improved in every sense, and those who came out after lengthy sentences & felt supported.

      I'm also hoping there are some who have come to understand why I couldn't support their release, why I stood in the way of some of their wishes/choices, and why I risked my neck & reputation to expose their abusive behaviours.

      I'm still only £50 down after 30 years' of out-of-my-pocket loans to those I supervised. My philosophy was "when the first person defaults, no more loans". The £50 default happened in my last month of work. Not bad after 30 years, eh? Heroin? Crack cocaine? No, just a seasoned grifter who was passing through. C'est la guerre.

      Delete